Will U.S. standing in the world rise once we exit Iraq?

John Mayer’s tepid anti-war ballad “Waiting on the World to Change” always bugged me, a slacker’s lament that makes excuses for its own lack of passion. At least now the once-popular song is dated, and we’re no longer waiting to see if the world’s attitude will change towards us. It already has.

President Obama has clearly contributed to this changing world his first 100 days. He’s authorized a staged withdrawal from Iraq, incorporating advice from top military commanders. This policy, earning grudging approval from Sen. John McCain and some concern from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, is bound to sit right with moderates everywhere. He’s communicated unequivocally and directly to the Arab world, starting with an inaugural address that proclaimed a need to “responsibly leave Iraq to its people.”

The Decider has given way to the Diplomat, and the world likes what it sees. Yet gaining global approval hardly requires turning tail; our buildup in Afghanistan demonstrates a focus not on fleeing conflict but redirecting resources where they can best help us fight our enemies.

The Pew Research Center just wrapped up an eight-year comprehensive study of global attitudes towards the U.S., and stat after stat shows that our favorability rating took a nosedive since 2000, with the ongoing war in Iraq a major cause of discontent. Yet even though we stood on shakier ground last fall, many across the globe held out hope for better relations.

Those better relations were certainly evident during the recent G-20 summit. There is some rock-star hype around Obama, to be sure, but it doesn’t account for the degree of his current global approval. Far too much anger has been generated by past U.S. unilateral actions for other nations to fall in line just because they like Obama’s style. No, there’s a real change in the air, based on policy, not personality.

Will our Iraq pullout make us safer? Hard to say, given that there will always be those who wish us harm, even if their numbers lessen. Yet when it comes to looking forward to the day that our global reputation is saved, rising phoenix-like out of the ashes of that one disastrous move—well, the wait on that change is over.

Will U.S. standing in the world rise once we exit Iraq?

Our standing may rise upon exiting Iraq, but primarily because many nations simply have more trust in a non-conservative American president. Case in point: according to that Pew study, the socially liberal nations of France, Germany and Britain overwhelmingly have confidence in President Obama to “do the right thing” globally. Yet Turkey, a predominantly Muslim country, does not, with only a 20 percent confidence rating.

Many don’t understand that some will dislike America no matter what we do – and that our global detractors have even more worrisome problems.

When the towers fell on 9/11, I watched in tears as CNN cut away to live Middle Eastern scenes of men, women and children dancing jubilantly in the streets. An ecstatic celebration of our 3,000 dead, of the great blow struck against the Great Satan. In the Palestinian territories, those fed and clothed with the aid of American dollars (an estimated $2 billion since the Oslo Accords) erupted in joy, firing weapons into the air as if they wished they had piloted the airplanes themselves.

CNN never aired those images again. But I remember. This was before Iraq. Before the war on terror. “Cowboy Bush” had been in office just 7 1/2 months. And still, presumably because we support Israel as well as the Palestinians, these Arabs rejoiced in our tragedy.

Heritage Foundation Middle-Eastern expert James Phillips explained by phone that Obama might currently be more popular in the overall Arab world, but “they are not going to like his policies, which are going to be pretty much the same. We will be defending our own interests and those of our allies.” And when Obama does that, “those that hate Israel and support the radical groups Hamas and Hezbollah are going hate us, regardless.”

Part of anti-U.S. feeling historically stems from our “global policeman” role – a role many nations abhor until they need it. Similarly, Phillips noted, Muslim extremists today hate Iraqi security forces just as much, since they are now defending a democratic country.

Europeans automatically like us more with Obama in office — but the Pew report also found an increase in their hostility toward Jews and Muslims. I wish other nations would look at the plank in their own eyes before picking the speck out of ours.

309 comments Add your comment

Gale

April 16th, 2009
8:07 am

wierd indeed. That has happened to me as well. If and when an errant post does show up, it is in the time thread and we don’t see it because the conversation has moved on. A bit frustrating, that.

USinUK

April 16th, 2009
1:15 am

weird are the ways of the W2W board …

chuck and TOJ – I posted a response to your morning posts yesterday, then, when i checked later, it was gone only to reappear this morning.

at any rate, scroll back up to yesterday at 12:42 to see my response to your posts.

Bruno – way cool on the tatt! while I’m not a big fan of the the Dead (as we’ve discussed), your guy did an amazing job on your Jerry!

The Other Jack

April 16th, 2009
12:27 am

Ref is a little b!tch

Now let’s be nice. He worked really hard on those little temper tantrums and I’m sure he didn’t have to drink too many beers in order to do it. Some people have problems with addictions to child pornography and alcohol and we shouldn’t make fun of those people.

Ref is a little b!tch

April 16th, 2009
12:20 am

Game, set match to TOJ

Joke IS yellow.

The Other Jack

April 16th, 2009
12:16 am

Hey joke.

Bite me. Glad you took the time. At least it kept you off the kiddy porn sites for s few hours.

JokesOn

April 15th, 2009
6:37 pm

Seriously, how loony are you?

You wrote: In all seriousness, if you are an example of binary thinking, then why in the world would anyone want to think like you?

Then try to cover your tracks with: I understand that you do not want binary thinking. Strength is not your strong point. Being wishy washy and weak is your mantra.

You are the one that cannot follow a simple conversation – much less one of actual complexity! And, you are caught lying again! Either way you slice it, one of your statements is a lie! Either you knew what it meant, and lied in trying to put me down (which backfired!); or you did not know and now are lying by saying you really did know. Bravo! It is going to be hard for you to top that one!

Binary or B & W thinking takes strength. It’s called taking a stand. You only half understand it because I explained it to you above. You thought it was thinking in “code,” like a c++ programmer. What does taking a stand matter if it is super-simplistic and ultimately wrong? Taking the easy route does not take strength! Wrestling a complex problem in all its messiness takes strength and critical thinking. You have neither. You must be Bush’s clone: I am the decider and will NEVER admit to errors. You lose again crust-ball;)

The Ref

April 15th, 2009
6:08 pm

Eight yellow cards to The Other Jack, which means he sits out the next four blog topics or until such time as he or she can learn to play nicely with others.

The Ref

April 15th, 2009
6:06 pm

Game, set, and match to JokesOn.

The Other Jack

April 15th, 2009
5:57 pm

Joke

BTW

I understand that you do not want binary thinking. Strength is not your strong point. Being wishy washy and weak is your mantra. Binary or B & W thinking takes strength. It’s called taking a stand.

JokesOn

April 15th, 2009
5:54 pm

In all seriousness, if you are an example of binary thinking, then why in the world would anyone want to think like you?

Although it was explained to you many times, you still do not understand that YOU are an example of binary thinking, and it is a bad thing. See, binary thinkers can only believe in one truth at a time. Proving one truth disproves another. Where-as, in reality, many truths occur in a topic at once (pluralism).

You rant the rest of your post without a hint higher/complex thinking. You put a phrase in quotes. Do you know what quotes even mean? They mean, here it comes….you are quoting someone! But you were not quoting anyone besides the voices in your head.

You brought you fabricated personal life into the blog. Refrain and maybe people will not call out your lies – including the personal aspects. Oddly, they are all sob stories that follow a week of you freaking out and calling everyone, not just me, names before running off crying.

Socialism is only one kind of economic system that some governments use.

Great example of binary thinking right here out of your mouth. Since it is a type of government, it cannot be a PART of another system/government. You realize how stupid you sound? A college campus is, by definition, a socialist environment. It is owned and run by the government; as are parks.

You have no ability to follow me. I know that. It happens each time and you have to compress a complex notion down to ONE aspect (binary: ones and zeros are all that exist…getting it yet? It is not thinking in code like you claimed before..lol). You then get yourself all confused on what I mean because your simple nature.

Perhaps I would if you had not been such a piece of trash in your posts toward me.

Like your first posts on this topic? You came on here being a total a$$ and called names. Then you went on to get personal with a blogger based on their screen-name! You do not even know her reasoning and you got personal.

What a big plus having you listen to me or be on my side god forbid! The person that got all this wrong: Concrete is as viable as asphalt no matter the climate, electric cars do not emit radiation like used uranium, the gestation period of a fertilized egg, Bush read raw intelligence reports, what binary thinking IS, the list goes on…

You are an angry old man who blames everyone else for running off your ex-wife because she found you with her sister; then she took extreme measures to get the he!! away from you. If it is not all a steaming pile of bs that is. Lol. You are a piece of work and pawned at every turn.