When I was growing up, seeing people with Down syndrome was common, and as a Special Olympics volunteer I was touched by how much they loved life. But today, at least 90 percent of women expecting a Down syndrome baby get an abortion, according to journals such as the American Journal of Medical Genetics. As in-utero screening has advanced, terminating Down syndrome pregnancies has become almost expected.
But should it be? Or are we as families and a society losing something important if we become a nation of more and more perfect people, preventing those with even the most livable disabilities from being born? As we get further away from recognizing that everyone is precious no matter their handicaps, we become less compassionate and accommodating toward those who are imperfect. And that makes it harder and harder parents to visualize how they could possibly navigate life with a Down syndrome child.
Forty years ago, that was easy to visualize. And those parents discovered that the loving, happy nature of most Down syndrome children was not a burden but a joy – to the family and society. Today, we need to get back to encouraging and supporting more women in keeping those babies – with everything from tax breaks to easier access to special services. Women should never be made to feel like they do today: that they really have no other choice but to terminate the pregnancy, simply because they can’t fathom how to move forward.
When Diana Lawler, a mom I know, discovered one child would be a Down syndrome son, she and her husband also adopted a Down syndrome daughter. She believes we should better encourage Down syndrome parents, saying “These kids have added so much to our family. My husband says God makes angels out of that extra chromosome. My other children get frustrated with them, sure. But I feel like in their lives this will be a plus; my son and daughter will never perform like other people, but my other kids love them unconditionally. It makes me sad that we are removing this element from our society. Down syndrome is an easy disability, comparatively, and the kids are so loving. They will teach you so much more than a ‘normal’ child.”
Should we do more to encourage women to keep Down syndrome babies?
My friend Susan brought it up during a coffee break at the center where we trained developmentally disabled adults. She said to me, “It would make sense for us to wind up with Down syndrome children someday. We’d know what to do.”
I was startled, but thought: Susan might be right, given what we did for a living. Of course, life doesn’t work that way, and other mothers have those babies, those challenges.
I understand Shaunti’s fervent anti-abortion stance, yet her odd combo platter of tax breaks and increased special programs wouldn’t affect the decision-making of any distraught, pregnant woman. And if you agree with her that raising a Down syndrome (DS) child to adulthood was easier to “visualize” 40 years ago, I’d like to buy you a time machine.
Throughout my 20s, I worked with developmentally disabled adults. Many had been shuttered away their whole childhoods or been warehoused alongside mentally ill patients, still burdened with behaviors that were learned from those peers. When I began this work in 1983, the median age of death among DS people was 25 years old. Before 1975, only one of every five children with a significant disability was even educated in our school system.
The truth is, the best argument for raising a Down syndrome child is all around us, right now. How far we’ve come, placing disabled kids in most mainstream educational environments, from Brownie troops to your average high school. It’s now standard issue to see a DS adult helping out at your local grocery or hospital. And while it is true that in-utero screening has increased terminations, Down syndrome is hardly being eradicated. The most recent CDC study points out that the number of DS babies born in the U.S. actually rose from 1,676 in 1996 to 2,085 in 2006, and other studies put the annual birthrate at much higher numbers.
So why are many women terminating these pregnancies? Perhaps it’s because life hands us so many unexpected difficulties, few want to take on the expected ones. Whatever the reason, I am only sure of this: deciding to keep or terminate a pregnancy is often a difficult choice. It is a choice that should be preserved.
159 comments Add your comment
USinUK
April 7th, 2009
2:46 am
“Anyway USinUk and others, since Sanford only has 1.5 years left I don’t think there’s enough push to get rid of him yet.”
Criminey, Archie, a lot of damage can be done in 18 months – especially if that someone has his eyes on a higher prize … if you don’t want to push for a recall, start organizing your church (with other churches) to march, write letters to the newspapers, holler and make it known that the people of SC are PI$$ED!!!
When in danger,
When in doubt
Don’t just stand there
Scream and shout!!!
American Woman
April 6th, 2009
6:44 pm
Archie, state politics are TOUGH! People love to sign up for a big, exciting national election like last year, but will those same people get their behinds out there for the Governor’s race and all the other state positions? It takes grass-root persistence to get competence at the state level, especially down South! What can you do? Get involved early, and pull in everybody you can. Win or lose, at least you’ll know you TRIED, and can blame the mess on all the people who refused to give a little time and effort. It’s your own conscience you go to sleep with, after all. They have to live with theirs.
Archie
April 6th, 2009
4:06 pm
Hello to Mara,USinUk,Gale and Lyrazel. I apologize for changing the topic but man I would love to do a recall but in South Carolina I hate to say it but so many people are still mentally fighting the federal government from what happened 237 years ago!!! Sanford’s own party doesn’t like him so my dislike isn’t partisan it’s just other than grandstanding, Sanford has done nothing for my state. He hates state employees, he hates public school teachers, he hates public schools, and he hates government in general. Those are all national GOP attitudes that he has taken to the extreme and those are all snake-oil ideas and his party members know this but since it’s South Carolina this nut can get away with it. You can’t hate government in general to the point that you mistreat the people that work for the government. The government has real people working that have worked hard to get their college degrees,etc. and most normal people know that thus they don’t buy the snake-oil of no taxes because that would mean no government. Anyway USinUk and others, since Sanford only has 1.5 years left I don’t think there’s enough push to get rid of him yet. Whenever I say something wrong on this blog don’t put it on me being black,male, or from South Carolina, just put it on me making a mistake. People are already writing articles about South Carolina’s legacy of missteps. Anyway just from reading this blog I really believe you ladies have something good to offer and I have said this before.
USinUK
April 6th, 2009
3:05 pm
Mara –
“did you see/read any of the Tyra Banks interview with Levi Johnson?”
I heard about the “did you use a condom? did you? did you? DID YOU?!!” before he finally admitted “well … not everytime”
um. not EVERYtime? you mean this wasn’t a one-time thing? NO!!!
I’m SHOCKED if that’s true about Palin letting them sleep in the same room – heck, my parents only let my high school BF and I study in my room – and, even then, the door had to be open.
Lyra –
“While she boldly totes the party line in Alaska do people realize Alaska has no facilities for treatments of DS? She has to go to the lower 48 to get her child medical services”
take the next step … she’s an AK state employee – I take it her health insurance picks up part of that tab … she should be grateful that she’s got health insurance – more than 21% of her state population DOESN’T http://www.rwjf.org/healthreform/product.jsp?id=40948 (the number of uninsured has increased by 56% in the last 12 years)
Lyrazel
April 6th, 2009
1:51 pm
Interesting to talk about Palin and this topic. While she boldly totes the party line in Alaska do people realize Alaska has no facilities for treatments of DS? She has to go to the lower 48 to get her child medical services. What happens to a family cannot afford such travel plus medical? Stimulus could be used to establish a new hospital for the citizens of Alaska but when politics is involved opportunity is wasted.
Archie, vote out incumbents!
Mara
April 6th, 2009
12:58 pm
USinUK – just like history has supported her “abstinence only” position
did you see/read any of the Tyra Banks interview with Levi Johnson? Evidently St. Sarah allowed Bristol and Levi to sleep in the same bedroom when they were living at her house. Now, they could have had twin beds in there ala Rob and Laura Petrie…
USinUK
April 6th, 2009
11:56 am
Gale –
“People like Palin and the SC gov can only hope that history supports their position”
HA – just like history has supported her “abstinence only” position …
Gale
April 6th, 2009
11:12 am
People like Palin and the SC gov can only hope that history supports their position. If it does not, people will remember their bad choice.
Gale
April 6th, 2009
11:10 am
Ever had one of those I cannot understand how you could possibly misunderstand that! moments? What part of do this in production now and not QA is not clear? ==end vent== But I know you folks in the IT world have had these moments.
USinUK
April 6th, 2009
11:07 am
Mara –
“I read that the legislature, Democrats and Republican both, are looking for ways to over-ride his decision.”
maybe he can run with Palin … she’s doing the same thing, turning down money targeted to help poor schools and special ed programs …
all I can say is … PLEASE!!! PLEASE USE THIS AS A PLANK IN YOUR CAMPAIGN PLATFORM!!!