<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was President Obama right to reverse Bush’s stem cell policy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/</link>
	<description>Shaunti Feldhahn, a right-leaning columnist, and Andrea Cornell Sarvady, a left-leaning columnist, debate issues in the news.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:59:49 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DOUGLASS SHAW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-9/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator>DOUGLASS SHAW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:58:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-1362</guid>
		<description>IF STEM CELL RESEARCH WILL LET US REPLACE LIMBS,AND INTERNAL ORGANS AS THEY CLAIM, THEN I WOULD NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS.BUT IF THIS DOES NOT DO WHAT THE LIBERALS HAVE SAID THEN THEY SHOULD NOT ONLY APOLOGIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BUT SEE THAT AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ARE REIMBURSE FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS. WHAT ABOUT THESE MONEY BEING SPENT ON NANO-TECHNOLOGY. IS THIS TECHNOLOGY BEING IGNORED.WHAT ABOUT SNAKE-VENOM BEING USED FOR CANCER TREATMENT?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF STEM CELL RESEARCH WILL LET US REPLACE LIMBS,AND INTERNAL ORGANS AS THEY CLAIM, THEN I WOULD NOT HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS.BUT IF THIS DOES NOT DO WHAT THE LIBERALS HAVE SAID THEN THEY SHOULD NOT ONLY APOLOGIES TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BUT SEE THAT AMERICAN TAXPAYERS ARE REIMBURSE FOR THEIR CONTRIBUTIONS. WHAT ABOUT THESE MONEY BEING SPENT ON NANO-TECHNOLOGY. IS THIS TECHNOLOGY BEING IGNORED.WHAT ABOUT SNAKE-VENOM BEING USED FOR CANCER TREATMENT?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JokesOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-9/#comment-863</link>
		<dc:creator>JokesOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-863</guid>
		<description>&lt;cite&gt;tt goes here&lt;/cite&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>tt goes here</cite></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JokesOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-9/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>JokesOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-854</guid>
		<description>../&#039;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>../&#8217;<i></i>&#8216;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JokesOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-9/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>JokesOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Small text</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Small text</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JokesOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-8/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>JokesOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-847</guid>
		<description>example test</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>example test</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JokesOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-8/#comment-839</link>
		<dc:creator>JokesOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-839</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;As a parent you are responsible for your kid’s actions–be it his beating up a geek in the bathroom and posting pics–or taking cheesy photos of her usually-privates and sending them to all your business contacts by email mistake&lt;/i&gt;

I thought that too, but it is not the case. The child is punished for criminal activity. Be it as an adult or juvenile, except where the parents had foresight that there was a potential problem.

Even the civil lawsuit depends on what state you are in. Most do not hold the parent directly responsible for crimes or mistakes by a kid unless the parents knew, for example, that their kid had an anger problem and was a threat to other kids or was playing ball in the street and could knock out your window.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>As a parent you are responsible for your kid’s actions–be it his beating up a geek in the bathroom and posting pics–or taking cheesy photos of her usually-privates and sending them to all your business contacts by email mistake</i></p>
<p>I thought that too, but it is not the case. The child is punished for criminal activity. Be it as an adult or juvenile, except where the parents had foresight that there was a potential problem.</p>
<p>Even the civil lawsuit depends on what state you are in. Most do not hold the parent directly responsible for crimes or mistakes by a kid unless the parents knew, for example, that their kid had an anger problem and was a threat to other kids or was playing ball in the street and could knock out your window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-8/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-835</guid>
		<description>USinUK

Simple.  When I am shown that I did say many untrue and down right false statements about “placenta stem cells” and “cord cells” I will apologize.  She said that i made the statements during her pregnancy so I can&#039;t really see that I would have been discussing Obama&#039;s funding of it when Bush was still president.

But the question I have for you is this:   Why are you trying so hard?  Why do insist on reaching so deep?  It shows a little desperation to me.     I don&#039;t dislike you.  I think that sometimes you can get very nasty and when you do, I tend to return the nastiness.  But I don&#039;t like that.  I would rather talk to you about things that we agree on.  Because discussing things that you disagree with always get really nasty, really fast.  And with sh!t stirrers, wanting to &quot;triangulate&quot; with you, many innocent discussions turn into wars.  

Look at the &quot;exploitation&quot; thing.  I said that women and children were exploited by the porn industry to joke.  He throws one of his normal fits, saying that there is no way any woman or child had ever been exploited by the porn industry.  When you do consider that (as you say) bank tellers are exploited by the banks and construction workers are exploited by the contractors, it is obvious that he had no argument.  But instantly, it was a huge discussion about the legal porn industry, where tapes were being sold, etc. etc. and everyone was twisting the discussion to make what the half wit had argued: fact.  Bad things were said to everybody by everybody so because the village idiot could not agree that the porn industry exploited women and children, we have huge flaming wars.  

Girl, when I appear on this forum, Joke and &quot;Sunshine&quot; the liar&#039;s heads explode.  If I am not posting to them, they will rifle through my posts to others to find some benign aspect of what I said to someone and start one of their usual vile and nasty attacks, and all of the sudden, you are in the middle of it.    And as shown by the half wit last night, there is no bottom to the depths that they will sink.  So it will never be civil.  The same sickness that makes him go to flicker sites and scream at people just because he suspects them of being me is the same sickness we are dealing with here.  

You and I have great discussions about a lot of things.  I like that.  I would rather do that than spend days and days screaming at each other because you insist on defending the village idiot.  As long as I am here. &quot;they&quot; will be here and you and I will continue screaming at each other.  I would rather that not be the case.  

BTW  You would love this new house.   It was built in the 30s, but it was ultra modern with lower ceilings and lots of structures to break up the vertical walls on the outside, sort of a small time Frank Loyd Wright.  All one level.  I got it at auction.  (Actually a real estate friend of mine did)    You wouldn&#039;t believe the deal.  The dog and cat are already there.   I&#039;m going to try and move in this weekend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USinUK</p>
<p>Simple.  When I am shown that I did say many untrue and down right false statements about “placenta stem cells” and “cord cells” I will apologize.  She said that i made the statements during her pregnancy so I can&#8217;t really see that I would have been discussing Obama&#8217;s funding of it when Bush was still president.</p>
<p>But the question I have for you is this:   Why are you trying so hard?  Why do insist on reaching so deep?  It shows a little desperation to me.     I don&#8217;t dislike you.  I think that sometimes you can get very nasty and when you do, I tend to return the nastiness.  But I don&#8217;t like that.  I would rather talk to you about things that we agree on.  Because discussing things that you disagree with always get really nasty, really fast.  And with sh!t stirrers, wanting to &#8220;triangulate&#8221; with you, many innocent discussions turn into wars.  </p>
<p>Look at the &#8220;exploitation&#8221; thing.  I said that women and children were exploited by the porn industry to joke.  He throws one of his normal fits, saying that there is no way any woman or child had ever been exploited by the porn industry.  When you do consider that (as you say) bank tellers are exploited by the banks and construction workers are exploited by the contractors, it is obvious that he had no argument.  But instantly, it was a huge discussion about the legal porn industry, where tapes were being sold, etc. etc. and everyone was twisting the discussion to make what the half wit had argued: fact.  Bad things were said to everybody by everybody so because the village idiot could not agree that the porn industry exploited women and children, we have huge flaming wars.  </p>
<p>Girl, when I appear on this forum, Joke and &#8220;Sunshine&#8221; the liar&#8217;s heads explode.  If I am not posting to them, they will rifle through my posts to others to find some benign aspect of what I said to someone and start one of their usual vile and nasty attacks, and all of the sudden, you are in the middle of it.    And as shown by the half wit last night, there is no bottom to the depths that they will sink.  So it will never be civil.  The same sickness that makes him go to flicker sites and scream at people just because he suspects them of being me is the same sickness we are dealing with here.  </p>
<p>You and I have great discussions about a lot of things.  I like that.  I would rather do that than spend days and days screaming at each other because you insist on defending the village idiot.  As long as I am here. &#8220;they&#8221; will be here and you and I will continue screaming at each other.  I would rather that not be the case.  </p>
<p>BTW  You would love this new house.   It was built in the 30s, but it was ultra modern with lower ceilings and lots of structures to break up the vertical walls on the outside, sort of a small time Frank Loyd Wright.  All one level.  I got it at auction.  (Actually a real estate friend of mine did)    You wouldn&#8217;t believe the deal.  The dog and cat are already there.   I&#8217;m going to try and move in this weekend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: USinUK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-8/#comment-829</link>
		<dc:creator>USinUK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-829</guid>
		<description>&quot;I dont have kids. Its sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo easy to say I would do this that and then the other–soooooooooooo easy; hard to do. My kid would HATE ME. She would have to pay for her own cell phone and show me all her pix on it.&quot;

hahaha ... I&#039;m sooooooo with ya on that one, sistah!!  I would definitely be Mean Mommy - NO, you can&#039;t have your computer in your room, NO you can&#039;t have a cell phone with a camera, NO, you can&#039;t go on a date when you&#039;re 14, and a big fat honkin NO to dating anyone more than 2 years older than you are!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I dont have kids. Its sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo easy to say I would do this that and then the other–soooooooooooo easy; hard to do. My kid would HATE ME. She would have to pay for her own cell phone and show me all her pix on it.&#8221;</p>
<p>hahaha &#8230; I&#8217;m sooooooo with ya on that one, sistah!!  I would definitely be Mean Mommy &#8211; NO, you can&#8217;t have your computer in your room, NO you can&#8217;t have a cell phone with a camera, NO, you can&#8217;t go on a date when you&#8217;re 14, and a big fat honkin NO to dating anyone more than 2 years older than you are!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyrazel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-8/#comment-825</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyrazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-825</guid>
		<description>I dont have kids. Its sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo easy to say I would do this that and then the other--soooooooooooo easy; hard to do. My kid would HATE ME. She would have to pay for her own cell phone and show me all her pix on it.

Mud means we will have lilacs soon. I planted lots of bulbs this year--so we have long long springs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont have kids. Its sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo easy to say I would do this that and then the other&#8211;soooooooooooo easy; hard to do. My kid would HATE ME. She would have to pay for her own cell phone and show me all her pix on it.</p>
<p>Mud means we will have lilacs soon. I planted lots of bulbs this year&#8211;so we have long long springs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JokesOn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/2009/03/27/was-president-obama-right-to-reverse-bush%e2%80%99s-stem-cell-policy/comment-page-8/#comment-824</link>
		<dc:creator>JokesOn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/woman/?p=74#comment-824</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Anyway, some of the consequences of the law (pedophile for life) are far too harsh.&lt;/i&gt;

And that is the only real place we disagreed. But common ground is now found, no?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Anyway, some of the consequences of the law (pedophile for life) are far too harsh.</i></p>
<p>And that is the only real place we disagreed. But common ground is now found, no?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
