Every now and then, the stock market exhibits irrational exuberance or pessimism. But these days, the market’s long-term trend is not irrational. For the first time since the Depression, events have aligned to create the very real possibility of something previously impossible: that the United States could fundamentally transition toward a more European welfare-state model.
“The market” is simply millions of decision-makers buying or selling based on future expectations. And they recognize a perfect storm when they see one. First, take vast economic upheaval and pain demanding attention. Second, add a popular new president with the “Old Keynesian” belief that solutions lie in major government spending and growth (where modern Keynsian models demonstrate limited impact of spending). Third, add the highly rare occurrence that both legislative bodies are of the same mindset with each other and the president, and the even rarer ability to veto most opposition to pass a radical restructuring into law. Finally, add the fact that this theoretical restructuring is no longer theory: the first steps are already being taken.
I ask: why wouldn’t the markets seem subdued? It was entirely logical for share values to descend from their October 2007 high, once we realized that our financial system had the cancer of securitized “nonconforming” loans that could never be repaid. Just as it was entirely logical for 2008 markets to recognize that we would probably have a President Obama – with a more European bent — dealing with our economic illness come January 2009.
Unfortunately, the European philosophy accepts there will be a permanent hit to business and employment because of the higher taxes needed to pay for higher government spending. For example, the Heritage Foundation’s James Sherk pointed out in an interview, Europe has averaged a 60 percent higher unemployment rate than America, and on average European workers remain unemployed more than 12 months compared to three to four months for American workers.
Presidents and policymakers should never react to day-to-day stock market movements, maintaining a long-term focus instead. But a true long-term focus will look to the past and recognize that U.S. affluence has been based on encouraging U.S. business and rejecting the European model. Yes, the economy is sick and we are working the cancer out of our system. But we shouldn’t risk killing the patient in the process.
Are Obama’s policies responsible for the stock market slide?
Since the conservative Washington Times announced “the honeymoon’s over” the day before Barack Obama took office, I suppose it only makes sense that the GOP 2012 game plan is to blame the president for a market slide that began its descent a full year before he came into power. Is the president turning us into — quelle horreur! — Europeans? Let’s take a closer look at just how much of this is Obama’s faute (that’s “fault”, for those of you still speaking English).
We know he didn’t invent the housing bubble or the credit crisis, we know he didn’t oversee the massive deregulation, all leading to the first large bailout on That Other Guy’s watch, and we’re pretty sure that the collective global economic meltdown isn’t his fault either.
In fairness, Obama is still learning how to walk that wobbly line that forces him to both chastise big business while he solicits our support in the government aid that might save it. Yet any inference that the market began to falter in anticipation of an Obama presidency is way off base. That was around the same time Lehman Brothers failed, WaMu was rescued and it literally looked like every bank in the country could go under. (I suppose the market rally the week before the election came because people suddenly decided John McCain had it in the bag? Hardly.)
These are uncertain times; it’s an era where a Comedy Central comedian feels more credible to us than an MSNBC analyst, where the once mighty GOP now turns, for direction and inspiration, to Jonathan Krohn, a 14-year-old with a knack for public speaking. No wonder political panic is rampant on the right. “Socialist” hasn’t had much traction; I can hardly blame them for throwing “European” against the market research wall, hoping the slur will stick.
Americans aren’t terrified of turning into Europeans; they’re rightly concerned about a deepening recession that impacts their lives on a daily basis. They have no trouble remembering and cherishing our proud capitalist roots, but you know what else sticks in their mind? That the perfect storm of events that brought us to this point has little to do with the leader we’re hoping will bring us to shore.
163 comments Add your comment
Gale
March 24th, 2009
1:18 pm
JustaJew, That is so sad, but true in many sectors. We don’t provides a lot of examples of responsibile behavior and accountability. If we did, those executives of failing companies who took/are taking bonuses, would instead refuse them and appologize to the many people their risky actions effected. I long to see one American executive publicly say he is sorry for the mess he helped to create and he is resigning because of his part. It is not in our cultural base apparently. Do parents even teach their children to fess up to thier mistakes anymore?
Gale
March 24th, 2009
1:02 pm
Lyrazel, I hate stubble. I can’t understand why most women don’t prefer beards on men.
JustaJew
March 24th, 2009
1:01 pm
how do we expect those students to grow up with any real sense of what American is all about?
Hey Gale, children, above al others, already know exactly what America is about because America is really about childish things now. 1.) It’s all about me and mine! 2.) HE DID IT!!! NOT ME!!!!
Those two positions pretty much sum up what America is about today….
Lyrazel
March 24th, 2009
11:42 am
Was recently looking at a men’s backhair shaver. Its shaped like a ruler and pet lint brush. Gentlemen rake their backs with it.
My husband cowered–and hid when I was laughing on my new career—saying:
Stubble!!!
O yes! Beauty is cruel.
Gandalf, the White!
March 24th, 2009
10:13 am
I might just open a brazilian wax palor exclusively for woman. To think a woman would actually pay me to wax her there! That’s insane!
Mara
March 24th, 2009
9:19 am
Lyrazel – I am thinking of a new career!!!!
eeewwww! Yeah, somebody’s got to do it…but ripping the hair off butts and genitalia just doesn’t sound like a lot of fun to me
and speaking of men getting waxed…the article said that “only the face, neck, abdomen, legs and arms are permitted” so why isn’t back hair included in the ban?
Lyrazel
March 24th, 2009
8:25 am
Mara! What they found out and do not really WANT to publish is how many men in weightlifting competition also get Brazilian waxes!
O! So many men! So much hair! I am thinking of a new career!!!!
Mara
March 24th, 2009
7:48 am
from the book of What the H*ll?! –
As if the Garden State didn’t have enough troubles, lawmakers in Trenton are prepared to level one of the foundations of the state economy: the Brazilian.
The state Board of Cosmetology and Hairstyling is moving toward a ban on genital waxing altogether after two women reported being injured in their quest for a smooth bikini line.
Both women were hospitalized for infections following so-called “Brazilian” bikini waxes; one of the women has filed a lawsuit, according to Jeff Lamm, a spokesman for New Jersey’s Division of Consumer Affairs, which oversees the cosmetology board.
Technically, genital waxing has never been allowed — only the face, neck, abdomen, legs and arms are permitted — but because bare-it-all “Brazilians” weren’t specifically banned, state regulators haven’t enforced the law.
“The genital area is not part of the abdomen or legs as some might assume,” Lamm said.
“Perhaps not, Mr. Lamm, but what do you say to the thousands of cosmetologists who are about to become criminals overnight? And what do you say to the millions of New Jersey women who will be forced to live with unwanted hair? And what of the state’s jobs and economy? Will New Jersey next ruin pivotal wealth producers like the orange body spray sector, or neon underbody manufacturers, because of a few industrial accidents?”
“Perhaps Brazilians from trained cosmetologists pose a slight risk, but what of the dangers of unlicensed waxing, sure to occur when the demand is driven underground?”
“Spa owner Linda Orsuto, who owns 800 West Salon & Spa in Cherry Hill, estimates that most of 1,800 bikini waxes performed at her business last year were Brazilian-style. “It’s huge,” she said, adding that her customers don’t think their bikini lines are anyone’s business but their own. “It’s just not right.” She said many customers would likely travel across state lines to get it and some might even try to wax themselves.
————————————————————————
and you all thought that we didn’t have enough to worry about…
Eric
March 24th, 2009
7:34 am
No, Obama is turning out to be very conservative and supportive of Wall Street and the rich who run it. What a disappointment for those of us on the left!
The Other Jack
March 24th, 2009
6:28 am
Gale
I had a great weekend. I gues USinUK is in the states now. Now what did I do with that creamy peanut butter?