<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So much for the Dems’ big tent</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/</link>
	<description>Not Wrong. Not Left. Right. Common sense conservatism with Jim Wooten</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 21:56:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: So much for the Dems’ big tent &#124; ATL Report - Atlanta News and Gossip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-17537</link>
		<dc:creator>So much for the Dems’ big tent &#124; ATL Report - Atlanta News and Gossip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 10:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-17537</guid>
		<description>[...] and some programs are awash in designated cash, while others of &#133;   Read more Here So much for the Dems&#8217; big tent  By jwooten  Yaab   Tagged as: enemy combatant, Fort Hood, free-for-all, Georgia, independent [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and some programs are awash in designated cash, while others of &#8230;   Read more Here So much for the Dems&#8217; big tent  By jwooten  Yaab   Tagged as: enemy combatant, Fort Hood, free-for-all, Georgia, independent [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MF Intown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-17014</link>
		<dc:creator>MF Intown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-17014</guid>
		<description>Sir, I believe you have the user fee policy recommendation exactly backwards.  We need a constitutional amendment to keep the revenue collected from user fees spent exclusively on the associated program rather than the other way around.  General fund revenues should be collected transparently as taxes only.

On the subject of toll roads, I could agree with the principle that funds collected should be re-invested in the efficient operation of the facility in question, but that would logically include perpetual resurfacing &amp; maintenenance costs, as well as subsidizing transit operations in the same corridor.  There simply is no such thing as &quot;paying off&quot; the costs of a road.  

As with using toll revenue to make the frequency of transit service attractive enough to lure erstwhile drivers, tolls - like any prices for other goods and services - serve to ration finite resources in the face of virtually infinite demand.  Keeping tolls, especially if they can be adjusted to maintain flowing conditions during peak consumption periods, after initial capital costs to construct a roadway have been payed down, would help maintain the value of that investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir, I believe you have the user fee policy recommendation exactly backwards.  We need a constitutional amendment to keep the revenue collected from user fees spent exclusively on the associated program rather than the other way around.  General fund revenues should be collected transparently as taxes only.</p>
<p>On the subject of toll roads, I could agree with the principle that funds collected should be re-invested in the efficient operation of the facility in question, but that would logically include perpetual resurfacing &amp; maintenenance costs, as well as subsidizing transit operations in the same corridor.  There simply is no such thing as &#8220;paying off&#8221; the costs of a road.  </p>
<p>As with using toll revenue to make the frequency of transit service attractive enough to lure erstwhile drivers, tolls &#8211; like any prices for other goods and services &#8211; serve to ration finite resources in the face of virtually infinite demand.  Keeping tolls, especially if they can be adjusted to maintain flowing conditions during peak consumption periods, after initial capital costs to construct a roadway have been payed down, would help maintain the value of that investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16890</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16890</guid>
		<description>Jim:
How is it that the conviction of Congressman Jefferson (D- LA) got no coverage in the AJC?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim:<br />
How is it that the conviction of Congressman Jefferson (D- LA) got no coverage in the AJC?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public Option's Doing Swell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16889</link>
		<dc:creator>Public Option's Doing Swell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:13:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16889</guid>
		<description>House Speaker Glenn Richardson has indicatged the Republican meme for health care by attempting suicide Sunday night, and one major question is why law enforcement did not alert a physician to issue a 1021 to hospitalize Richardson so that he could not do harm  to himself and to  designate the best possible treatment for him.

This is a republican paradigm for bad healthcare  Perhaps Richardson was depresed because white hick Republicans are the only legislature in the US to refuse to fund the 8th largest Metro transit system in the U.S.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>House Speaker Glenn Richardson has indicatged the Republican meme for health care by attempting suicide Sunday night, and one major question is why law enforcement did not alert a physician to issue a 1021 to hospitalize Richardson so that he could not do harm  to himself and to  designate the best possible treatment for him.</p>
<p>This is a republican paradigm for bad healthcare  Perhaps Richardson was depresed because white hick Republicans are the only legislature in the US to refuse to fund the 8th largest Metro transit system in the U.S.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Broe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16884</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Broe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16884</guid>
		<description>&quot;Have no dog in the fight&quot;

 I&#039;ve always got a dog in the fight, a stone in my pocket, and an iron in the fire.  I keep abreast, I stay armed, and my eye&#039;s on the prize.  I live by the code, I love &#039;em and leave &#039;em and I call &#039;em as I see &#039;em......... 

sorry, I love cliches as much as the next man.

 
&quot;Soldiers killed at Fort Hood died on the battlefield, killed by an enemy combatant who, astonishingly, managed to evade detection despite obvious clues. This massacre requires in-depth independent investigation.&quot;  

Wooten&#039;s probably right about Major Hasan.  Psychoanalysis of post traumatic stress disorder usually happens AFTER a tour of duty in a battle zone, not before.  Could this be the first case of pre-battle fatigue?    Booby trapping a rorschach test is the new IED?  (Lie down on the couch and let me add to the skeletons in your closet).   

I&#039;m not willing to give the army a black eye based on the first blush of information about this massacre.  The Ft. Hood disaster was either a disgruntled bi-polar major-gone-postal, or an attack by Al Queda. 

 
I&#039;m glad we&#039;ve got Freud and Sun Tzu&#039;s son, Jim Wooten, to hazard a guess in this minefield.   It&#039;s one thing to harbor resentment against radical Islam, it&#039;s another thing to foment rebellion and treason in the armed forces by instilling doubt about the good men and women serving this great country.    

Nobody questions Wooten&#039;s patriotism, but I&#039;ll respectfully wait till the investigation is over.........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Have no dog in the fight&#8221;</p>
<p> I&#8217;ve always got a dog in the fight, a stone in my pocket, and an iron in the fire.  I keep abreast, I stay armed, and my eye&#8217;s on the prize.  I live by the code, I love &#8216;em and leave &#8216;em and I call &#8216;em as I see &#8216;em&#8230;&#8230;&#8230; </p>
<p>sorry, I love cliches as much as the next man.</p>
<p>&#8220;Soldiers killed at Fort Hood died on the battlefield, killed by an enemy combatant who, astonishingly, managed to evade detection despite obvious clues. This massacre requires in-depth independent investigation.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Wooten&#8217;s probably right about Major Hasan.  Psychoanalysis of post traumatic stress disorder usually happens AFTER a tour of duty in a battle zone, not before.  Could this be the first case of pre-battle fatigue?    Booby trapping a rorschach test is the new IED?  (Lie down on the couch and let me add to the skeletons in your closet).   </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not willing to give the army a black eye based on the first blush of information about this massacre.  The Ft. Hood disaster was either a disgruntled bi-polar major-gone-postal, or an attack by Al Queda. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad we&#8217;ve got Freud and Sun Tzu&#8217;s son, Jim Wooten, to hazard a guess in this minefield.   It&#8217;s one thing to harbor resentment against radical Islam, it&#8217;s another thing to foment rebellion and treason in the armed forces by instilling doubt about the good men and women serving this great country.    </p>
<p>Nobody questions Wooten&#8217;s patriotism, but I&#8217;ll respectfully wait till the investigation is over&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retiredds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16883</link>
		<dc:creator>retiredds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16883</guid>
		<description>I see that Jim must be having a difficult time coming up with a response from several of us. It is hard to rationalize the duplicity of the Republican right. Jim, I learned a long time ago that if you are going to disparage another (person, party, group), I should at the least be &quot;squeaky clean&quot; myself. So, keep on with the Democrats are bad/Republicans are good scenario so we can get our laughs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see that Jim must be having a difficult time coming up with a response from several of us. It is hard to rationalize the duplicity of the Republican right. Jim, I learned a long time ago that if you are going to disparage another (person, party, group), I should at the least be &#8220;squeaky clean&#8221; myself. So, keep on with the Democrats are bad/Republicans are good scenario so we can get our laughs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matilda</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16882</link>
		<dc:creator>Matilda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16882</guid>
		<description>GOP Big Tent Democracy in action: Mike Pence, (R – Indiana) &quot;It’s wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of Americans and use it for a procedure they find morally offensive. In the Congress of the United States, we have a responsibility to respect the moral beliefs of the majority of the American people…&quot;

&lt;strong&gt;But of course the majority of Americans who favor the public option can go *bleep* themselves.&lt;/strong&gt;  Thanks again, Jon Stewart, for showing us how our Representative Republic works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOP Big Tent Democracy in action: Mike Pence, (R – Indiana) &#8220;It’s wrong to take the taxpayer dollars of millions of Americans and use it for a procedure they find morally offensive. In the Congress of the United States, we have a responsibility to respect the moral beliefs of the majority of the American people…&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>But of course the majority of Americans who favor the public option can go *bleep* themselves.</strong>  Thanks again, Jon Stewart, for showing us how our Representative Republic works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillbilly Deluxe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16881</link>
		<dc:creator>Hillbilly Deluxe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16881</guid>
		<description>Voice of Reason @ 7:36

Very good point. Of course, they don&#039;t want to risk their own money; they sort of side step that part of the free market that they supposedly love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Voice of Reason @ 7:36</p>
<p>Very good point. Of course, they don&#8217;t want to risk their own money; they sort of side step that part of the free market that they supposedly love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dagwood bumstead</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16880</link>
		<dc:creator>dagwood bumstead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16880</guid>
		<description>Jim, are you prepared to place some of the blame for Maj. Hassan on the Bush Administration? Will we finally get an admission from you that Dubya made a mistake? Or will you do your usual dance and blame it all on Obama and liberals and leftists? And calling him an enemy combatant, low even for you. But I&#039;m sure you&#039;ll go lower still as long as you keep writing. 
The Stupak amendment should be enough evidence for you of the Dem&#039;s big tent. The District 23 fiasco in NY State should be evidence enough that the GOP tent is basically a pup tent right now. Frankly, I don&#039;t even get whatever point you might be pitching in the last paragraph. Doesn&#039;t really have one, does it, other than to perhaps show what you believe is cleverness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, are you prepared to place some of the blame for Maj. Hassan on the Bush Administration? Will we finally get an admission from you that Dubya made a mistake? Or will you do your usual dance and blame it all on Obama and liberals and leftists? And calling him an enemy combatant, low even for you. But I&#8217;m sure you&#8217;ll go lower still as long as you keep writing.<br />
The Stupak amendment should be enough evidence for you of the Dem&#8217;s big tent. The District 23 fiasco in NY State should be evidence enough that the GOP tent is basically a pup tent right now. Frankly, I don&#8217;t even get whatever point you might be pitching in the last paragraph. Doesn&#8217;t really have one, does it, other than to perhaps show what you believe is cleverness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: retiredds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/2009/11/12/so-much-for-the-dems%e2%80%99-big-tent/comment-page-1/#comment-16879</link>
		<dc:creator>retiredds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/thinking-right/?p=788#comment-16879</guid>
		<description>Jim, just to balance your reporting. You speak of the legislature needing to outlaw linking taxes that are disguised as &quot;user fees&quot;. I agree wholeheartedly, it should be done away with. However, we have had a Republican legislature and executive for the last seven years and this kind of stuff continues. How is that Jim? Could it be the disguise you speak of, in public Republicans are totally against raising taxes, but in the darkness of the back room, user fees are allowed. Sounds better doesn&#039;t it.

Secondly you speak of the feeding frenzy of the AFL-CIO over fixing the airline industry and the Transportation  Secretary holding a closed door forum. Yes, I agree that is not right. But Jim, your colleague Jay Bookman sites (in today&#039;s AJC), right below your article, that our own Governor is holding water meetings where &quot;the press and public are barred from attending&quot;. How is it that you didn&#039;t see fit to report on this? Seems to me that a closed to the press and public meeting is what it is (whether initiated by a Democrat or Republican). So how about rewriting your headline to read, &quot;So much for the Dems&#039; (and Repubs&#039;) big tent&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim, just to balance your reporting. You speak of the legislature needing to outlaw linking taxes that are disguised as &#8220;user fees&#8221;. I agree wholeheartedly, it should be done away with. However, we have had a Republican legislature and executive for the last seven years and this kind of stuff continues. How is that Jim? Could it be the disguise you speak of, in public Republicans are totally against raising taxes, but in the darkness of the back room, user fees are allowed. Sounds better doesn&#8217;t it.</p>
<p>Secondly you speak of the feeding frenzy of the AFL-CIO over fixing the airline industry and the Transportation  Secretary holding a closed door forum. Yes, I agree that is not right. But Jim, your colleague Jay Bookman sites (in today&#8217;s AJC), right below your article, that our own Governor is holding water meetings where &#8220;the press and public are barred from attending&#8221;. How is it that you didn&#8217;t see fit to report on this? Seems to me that a closed to the press and public meeting is what it is (whether initiated by a Democrat or Republican). So how about rewriting your headline to read, &#8220;So much for the Dems&#8217; (and Repubs&#8217;) big tent&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
