Comments on: Letterman, Polanski and us

By: Marc

Marc — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:08:02 +0000

Brad Steel so if you can’t defend your ideas you resort to attempted name calling. Or is the problem with comprehension? It really must be the comprehension because these two words don’t belong together “pedantic ignorance”. This saying that I have a pedestrian/normal/unimaginative/boring ignorance and that doesn’t realy make sense and isn’t much of and insult. Which would led one to believe that your trying to be verbose!

By: Ragnar Danneskjöld

Ragnar Danneskjöld — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:57:40 +0000

Dear LeeH1 @ October 6th, 2009 3:39 pm, I think you have a weak argument: “Hollywood people are more moral, since they don’t criticize other people’s morals, they just defend their own.” An absence of moral standards is not a superior morality to those with even poor compliance with weak standards. Indeed, the opposite is the case – even a defective moral behavior is a superior morality to those with no moral standards. I appreciate your argument is a catechism mindlessly chanted by leftists; that repetition does not make it true. Four legs good, two legs bad.

By: Reality Check

Reality Check — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:07:21 +0000

Listen to the DNC media liberals jump for joy in victory over the latest poll [all 1,003 adults polled anyway] showing that those who approve and appose Democrat Healthcare reform are evenly split 40/40. Isn’t that so typical of the mindset of liberals in lib land: “we’re dead even so that means our side has won!” In the case of elections that they narrowly lost of course, it’s one of two things: it was a stolen election or it was some sort of victory because the election was stolen. This is the mindset of liberals.

Another hilarious thing happened in Detroit:

“DETROIT — Detroit’s homeless and low-income residents have another opportunity for a chance at millions of stimulus dollars. The money is available to help low-income residents from becoming homeless and homeless residents to find housing. Thousands of people lined up Tuesday. Some people in line falsely believed they were registering for $3,000 stimulus checks from the Obama Administration.” What a liberal socialism paradise, no? GIMMIE WHAT’S DUE TO ME!!! GIMMIE GIMMIE GIMMIE!!!

The Chart O’Day reminds us of that brilliant cash for clunkers program dreamed up in liberal land:

http://www.businessinsider.com/chart-of-the-day-us-auto-sales-2009-10

Can’t wait to see more loans go into default by that useless feel good policy. Oh wait…..

“Oct. 2 (Bloomberg) — The number of U.S. lenders that can’t collect on at least 20 percent of their loans hit an 18-year high, signaling that more bank failures and losses could slow an economic recovery.”

And to think the pinheads running this nation for two years in Congress now and going on nine months in the White House now are still blaming the Bushies for their own failed policies. Sorry, Charlies, America doesn’t have the patience to listen to finger pointing with you people on the left at the helm running the US aground.

By: Brad Steel

Brad Steel — Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:44:05 +0000

Marc @ 4:40
Thank you for a perfect demonstration of your pedantic ignorance.

By: Darrel

Darrel — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:21:33 +0000

Enter your comments here
Well, Letterman finally shows to be the sleazebag that he always appeared to be. Damn, it must be hell when it all comes back around like it did for him. Wonder who he is going to malign next on his crappy, half-witted show. That’ll teach his wife to slum around, too, because she should have known what he was before she married him!

By: Joan

Joan — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:11:12 +0000

LeeHi–nobody did what Clinton did. He was after all the President at the time, and he did it in the Oval Office. That takes the cake. And believe me, plenty of Democrats have/do/did mess around. I used to live in DC and word gets around (but not as fast as those Congressmen!!).

By: Joan

Joan — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 23:08:37 +0000

About Polanski, the person equally guilty with him is the 13 year old’s mother. No one has mentioned the failure of parental responsibility in this case. I am amazed by that. I raised a daughter, and do not believe I would have ever left her alone for a “photo shoot” with a man, while she was a minor. As for Hollywood, everyone knows they do live on another planet. They can vote Democrat, pay half their salaries in taxes, and still live on multi-millions. If I had a billion, I guess I wouldn’t mind paying more taxes either cause I would have plenty left over.

By: Marc

Marc — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:40:05 +0000

No I am saying if you don’t understand it don’t invest in it. I’m saying spend more time learning about your investments than you do the box scores of the games or whats on TV. There was a time when it was much more difficult to gather this information but with the Internet it there with a few key strokes. If you don’t like the way the CEO is getting paid pull your stock or vote him out – your not the only one that thinks that way. Amvet as long as your prefer being the victim you will. The government is not there at least the fed to protect you from anything other than attacks by another nation and in some instances inter-state trade. IT IS NOT PART OF THE CONSTITUTION THEREFORE IT IS NOT THE FEDERALS GOVERNMENTS RESPONSIBILITY.

By: AmVet

AmVet — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:24:53 +0000

Marc, you are saying the victims of crime are responsible. No the criminals.

The new “free market” manta – Glorify the wicked and vilify the weak.

No wonder the fascists who run Wall Street and K Street have strolled off with OUR money.

Our “elected leaders” no longer even pretend to protect or represent us.

They know with an electorate like this they don’t even have to try…

By: RetiredSoldier

RetiredSoldier — Tue, 06 Oct 2009 20:12:08 +0000

LeeH1-

Does that apply to “I’m going to drain the swamp” Pelosi also? You know the speaker that was going to clean up Congress all by herself! Well Charlie Rangal certainly appreciates the good job Pelosi has done. Ye without sin cast the first stone.