Smith & Wesson lessons for GM

Poor General Motors employees.  Their company is likely to be the first victim of the government’s effort to pick industrial winners and losers.  The ramifications of the government’s takeover of General Motors should frighten every worker, stockholder and manager of every private sector company in the country.

The company has put itself in the position that the Left could only have wished for. The automobile industry  has for years been packaged with the utility industry and Wal-Mart as the liberals’ favorite villan.  Liberals wanted the industry to build the itsy-bitsy "green" cars that sip gas, ride rough and are treated unfairly in collisions with full-size cars and are death-traps in collisions with the hated SUVs.  Consumers loved them just as they love mass transit — for the other person.  They’d buy them only when gas hit $4 a gallon.

Until now, government has never been able to force automakers to build the models liberals want sold.  Nor could they convince motorists that the left’s version of public virtue outweighed their preferences for comfort and safety.  Now, though, a government that can pick the CEO and board of directors for GM can certainly pick its designers and product lines.  

Government will destroy General Motors.  Nobody wants to buy a car from the Post Office.  Nobody wants to buy a car from a company producing a product line that’s essentially dictated by Washington.

Almost a decade ago, gun manufacturer Smith & Wesson drew the ire of the National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners of America and others for an agreement with the Clinton Administration to restrict gun sales and to require government-approved training for sellers. The Clinton White House hailed it as "the first time a major gun manufacturer has committed to fundamentally change the way guns are designed, distributed and marketed."

Gun owners reacted by boycotting Smith & Wesson. Sales plunged. A year later, Smith & Wesson was sold to Saf-T-Hammer Corporation for $15 million, a fraction of the $112.5 million its owner, Tomkins PLC, paid four years earlier. The company renounced the agreement and gradually Smith & Wesson returned to the good graces of gun enthusiasts.

The point here is that when the marketplace becomes convinced that a company is in bed with government, consumers react. They will against General Motors, too, if the company becomes perceived as Obama, Inc., and is pushing a product line the Left wants in your driveway.  

A straight-out GM bankruptcy could seriously damage the company.  Becoming Exhibit A in the development of a government industrial policy will, however, do far worse damage to the company, its stockholders and its workers.

73 comments Add your comment

get out much?

April 1st, 2009
9:04 am

I wonder who made this quote earlier this week: “A clean bankruptcy would have been better for GM and for the nation.” It looks like Mr. Wooten is doing his somersaults again.

hryder

April 1st, 2009
9:07 am

The Big “O” and Congress would do the entire country a big favor by taking an extended vacation, at least six months, from uttering or releasing any comments or policy for public consumption. This might assure that whatever said one day or week would not be countermanned when no thought of possible consequences had been considered regarding the original comment.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
9:16 am

I like the part where you talk about the government trying foolishly to influence what type of cars are made and sold. That’s pretty funny, the way you put it. But, you know, when you think about it, if Detroit had sailed the liberal tack then it wouldn’t be in the position of having to sell itself to Europe’s worst automaker, or of finding itself with a Hummer Division with a value of zero.

Besides, I am not the only one who thinks it’s a good thing to save GM, even if it takes the government to do it. Jobs. Jobs. Good honest meaningful rewarding jobs.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:30 am

The government may seek to ease General Motors into what it calls a
“controlled” bankruptcy, somewhere between a prepackaged bankruptcy and
court chaos, by persuading at least some creditors to agree to a plan
that would cleave the company into two pieces, The New York Times’s
Michael J. de la Merced and Jonathan D. Glater reported, citing people
briefed on the matter.

Instead of signing on every creditor as is typically required in
prepackaged deals, administration officials are using as leverage the
promise of taxpayer financing. The effort is a new role for the
government, which has not pushed companies into bankruptcy in the past
as much as it has stepped in when all else fails.

G.M.’s new chief executive, Fritz Henderson, also said that the
pressure from the government pushed the automaker closer to bankruptcy.
“By no later than June 1, if we’re not able to accomplish this outside
bankruptcy, we’ll be in bankruptcy,” he said at a news conference in
Detroit on Tuesday.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:31 am

The city of Chicago will give a group of investors led by Citigroup’s
Citi Infrastructure Investors an extra six months to raise the
necessary cash to complete its $2.5 billion deal for Midway Airport.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:33 am

Under intense political pressure, the board that sets accounting rules
in the United States will meet on Thursday to complete changes in
accounting rules that are aimed at reducing the losses banks have been
forced to report as the values of their mortgage-backed securities
crumbled

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:35 am

German Chancellor Angela Merkel said Tuesday that her government would
help a private investor secure General Motors’ Opel unit, but indicated
that direct aid to the embattled carmaker was unlikely.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:37 am

A state judge in Connecticut has slapped a temporary asset freeze on
the managers of three large hedge funds that invested their clients’
money with Bernard L. Madoff, who has pleaded guilty to operating a
vast Ponzi scheme.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:38 am

A New York appeals judge has refused to lift a temporary court order
barring the brother of the admitted swindler Bernard L. Madoff from
disposing of his assets.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:38 am

Idearc, a publisher of yellow-page directories, filed for bankruptcy
reorganization on Tuesday and said it had reached a tentative agreement
with its main lenders to reduce its debt substantially.

Big Bucks GOP

April 1st, 2009
9:39 am

Sun-Times Media, the parent company of The Chicago Sun-Times newspaper,
filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and hired an investment bank
to explore possible asset sales.

Bill Shipp.. Real Conservative

April 1st, 2009
9:42 am

Remember “The Rat” – a giant Godzilla-like creature that stalked the Georgia TV-scape nearly 10 years ago? The monster – a guy in a rat suit – starred in the darnedest political commercial Georgia had ever seen. The rat gobbled up everything in sight. He even ate the Capitol. The year was 2002.

Georgia Democrats were aghast. Depicting Georgia’s then-governor, Roy E. Barnes, as a marauding rodent seemed, well, somehow disrespectful. Perhaps it was, but it worked. Sonny Perdue won the governor’s mansion and led the first Republican takeover of Georgia government since the end of Reconstruction.

GOP strategist Dan McLagan was responsible for the rat idea, which was equal parts comedy, tragedy and inspiration.

When gallant Republicans finally vanquished “Rat Roy” at the end of the commercial, a deep voice intoned:

“There’s a new day dawning in Georgia. The doors to the governor’s office will be flung open to the people. New ideas will be encouraged and rapidly implemented. Schools will flourish; traffic diminish. As businesses are unleashed to grow jobs, and, as Georgia recovers, new employers will flood the state.”

The rat lied, but the people believed him anyway. Unemployment skyrocketed and so did home foreclosures. Traffic didn’t diminish. It exploded. Developers went bankrupt. The state was caught up in the worst drought in centuries – a drought for which most governmental jurisdictions were totally unprepared.

Gov. Sonny Perdue, who went to China twice, has received much of the blame for the Decade of the Rat. Singling out Sonny may be unfair. A loser elephant in the White House and a mostly brain-dead congressional delegation contributed to our mess. Come to think of it, Mother Nature jumped in, too.

So here we are, near the end of the decade and political campaigns are revving up again. Dan McLagan, the father of the rat, reportedly is on his way back to Georgia to help Republicans, possibly gubernatorial contender Karen Handel.

McLagan is said to be traveling this way in the company of the rat. The rat’s Dr. Frankenstein badly needs a win.

In November, Democrat Kay Hagan of North Carolina whacked noted GOP incumbent Elizabeth Dole in the Senate election. McLagan, Sen. Dole’s chief adviser and hatchet man, claimed Hagan was godless when, in fact, she was Presbyterian. McLagan should have used the rat. The Presbyterian beat the socks off the Inquisition’s McLagan and his candidate.

In any event, the 2010 statewide elections ought to be dandy. My current GOP primary favorite for governor is Handel, if she doesn’t get carried away by McLagan and one of his oddball schemes.

Because ex-Gov. Roy Barnes is keeping mum on his plans, I’ll sit on my Democratic forecasts for a while.

The current era is not over ’til it’s over. Though the General Assembly gave big business everything it wanted this year, there’s still work to be done. The legislative session is supposed to adjourn at the end of the week. Don’t count on it.

The budget – even with a heavy dose of pep pills from the federal stimulus package – is still in dire straits, with deficits in Medicaid and other entitlement programs.

House leaders say a special session of the General Assembly almost certainly will be necessary to untangle the spending bills.

Perhaps House Speaker Glenn Richardson should call in McLagan and the rat for consultation. After all, the rat had the right answer back in 2002. He just promised the moon, and the suckers believed every word he squeaked.

Ga Values

April 1st, 2009
9:45 am

I’ll beat Redneck to the draw, as Colt men, we know that Smith & Wesson only makes junk for the uninformed, these are the same people who would buy a Vega.

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
10:07 am

Grading Wooten: Today’s soup was Very Dry, with but a zest of Irony. What Wooten is saying here is that liberals feel entitled to always look for the union label, the zero-deductible health care policy, or the scientific theory in the classrooms. Wooten is asserting that liberals always look past the fish bumper sticker and only see the soccer ball, and base all their derision of the Right on the demoralizing concept of christian fifty-somethings going full spandex. Wooten is insisting that free government cheese cant ever be as good as Velveeta.

Where Wooten’s argument breaks down: His premis,e about a laize faire producing quality automobiles or sound companies, is bankrupt. Yes, it’s a form of circular logic, in that his conclusion, that laissez-faire is always a sound policy for our economy is in his premise, that any government interference is a catastrophe.

Wooten, you have consistently concealed your ability to advance a discussion without relying on false premises. You’ve perpetually presented unsound arguments.

Lets examine your career closer, Wooten: So you dreamed of someday getting away from the farm and being a writer, and you made it all the way to the AJC! Well, congratulations! Too bad you read to me like a pulp rube, with your ill chosen gerunds in overly-contradictory compound sentences complete with matching past participle decay and indirect object dangling. Do you think you can persuade me with your poorly-constructed tirades? Bookman tried to persuade me once, and I flamed his twitter with some fava beans and a nice Chianti.

Sszvffivfffivfivfivfiv!!

Davo

April 1st, 2009
10:10 am

So when JW says …..”Liberals wanted the industry to build the itsy-bitsy “green” cars …blah blah”… and neglects to mention that is was Bush and the republicans who provided incentives to car companies to produce and finance SUV’s and tax deductions to business to buy them; it just kinda rings hollow. Where was all the outrage then, JW?

Another point you continually site is bankruptsy for GM…can’t happen. GM is beyond banksruptsy…there is really no way for it to pay its creditors in any reasonable time period. They are going to fail sooner or later. It amazes me that Obama supporters are so thrilled to be giving money to GM when they should be looking towards what to do with the tens of thousands of unemployed to come of this.

Churchill's MOM

April 1st, 2009
10:16 am

I wish we had a Covernor like Sara, Sonny has been a disaster. Why is it that a man who does not have the will power to keep his zipper up gets the honor to speak at a major Republican meeting?

Sarah Palin continues to have a rocky post-election season in the nation’s capital.

Congressional Republicans are replacing their party’s former vice presidential nominee as the headliner of their big spring fundraising dinner with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich after the Alaska governor vacillated publicly about the appearance, sources familiar with the situation said Tuesday.

Gingrich, still popular with the conservative base, will be the keynote speaker for the annual Senate-House GOP dinner, which will be held on June 8 at the Washington Convention Center, hosted by National Republican Senatorial Committee Chairman John Cornyn (R-Texas) and National Republican Congressional Committee Chairman Pete Sessions (R-Texas).

Palin’s withdrawal is her latest public stumble since Election Day 2008 and the latest evidence of miscommunication between her Washington-based political action committee and her gubernatorial staff in Alaska. The decision by national Republicans to pull the plug on Palin — a significant draw — also reflects the GOP establishment’s growing unease with the Alaska governor.

“The Governor never confirmed her attendance at the event. She was honored to receive the invitation and asked to confirm her attendance at the end of the legislative session,” said Meghan Stapleton, a spokeswoman for SarahPAC. “Governor Palin is thrilled to hear that Newt Gingrich will address the audience as the governor continues to focus on Alaska.”

However, the fact that Palin was never completely confirmed as a speaker was precisely the problem, according to sources familiar with the deliberations about who would speak at the dinner.
Palin’s office was not immediately available for comment on the decision by the two committees.

Palin was never completely confirmed as a speaker — which was precisely the problem, according to sources familiar with the deliberations about who would speak at the dinner

The NRSC and the NRCC were under the distinct impression that Palin would headline the annual fundraising dinner. The committees went so far as to issue a joint press release trumpeting her appearance and national news outlets quickly noted her prime speaking engagement. Palin’s PAC indicated to the committees that she would attend.

But the governor’s office later said that it had not put the event on the schedule. Three people close to planning for the dinner said Palin’s aides proceeded to hem and haw about the appearance, both publicly and privately, leading the committees to decide to replace her because they were nearing a deadline to send invitations and other fundraising materials to their donors.

“After initially confirming her attendance, Governor Palin’s team informed the committees that her gubernatorial responsibilities in Alaska prevented her from committing until the end of the legislative session,” NRSC spokesman Brian Walsh said. “We completely understand and respect Governor Palin’s focus on her official state business.”

But the NRSC spokesman went out to point out that “there is obviously an enormous amount of planning that goes into this annual event. For that reason, we invited and are honored to have former Speaker Newt Gingrich join us as our speaker at the 2009 Senate-House Dinner.”

The dinner dust-up continues a now-familiar storyline for Palin. As POLITICO’s Jonathan Martin and Andy Barr reported Sunday, a seemingly unending series of public relations gaffes has Palin loyalists frustrated and worried she is diminishing her stature. And they are blaming an inner circle they say is composed of not-ready-for-primetime players.

Some of the previous incidents that have even pro-Palin Republicans fretting about the competence of the staff surrounding her:

* The infamous YouTube turkey video in November where, unbeknownst to Palin, live turkeys were slaughtered just behind her within the camera frame.

* A misfire involving the 2009 Conservative Political Action Conference in Washington. There, Palin had been slated for months to appear only to back out shortly before the event, leaving bruised feelings among organizers who thought they had a firm commitment from Palin herself. A spokeswoman for Palin’s PAC contends the governor had never agreed to appear and that Palin’s camp was surprised when CPAC announced the governor would be speaking at the event.

* An interview with conservative filmmaker John Ziegler, who included Palin in his film, “Media Malpractice: How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Targeted.” Comments by Palin about Caroline Kennedy and CBS News anchor Katie Couric contained in excerpts released by Ziegler generated tremendous controversy and prompted a Palin spokesman to blame Ziegler for blindsiding the governor.

But Ziegler told POLITICO that Palin had called him to express support in a nearly 30-minute telephone call.

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
10:18 am

Ga Values didn’t mean Colt 45. He meant the Schlitz Malt Liquor Bull.

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
10:27 am

There’s a new self-help book called the, “The Ripple Effect”, about how a woman’s sex life can affect her career. The premise of the entire book is that a woman has sex for herself, and herself alone, and that any man will do, if she’s confident enough, that is, no man can make a woman feel sexy if she’s not already confident in her own sexuality.

Thank chick-movies and chick-books for the sexual revolution’s Phallic Phoenix. The entire chick-flick industry depends on sluts teaching other sluts how to be sluts. I love it! It’s still wide open out there, man! It’s raining sexually confident chicks, man! We must be in heaven man!!

Man’s best way in: STFU! Don’t say anything. There’s too many wrong answers with chicks. Just be there. Eye contact. Smiles. The occasional relevant or gently humorous comment. Hold hands. Touch shoulders. Smile. Eye contact.

Then just put your lips together and blow.

MDinGA

April 1st, 2009
10:28 am

Now that the government has control of this company, social engineering concepts will be applied at GM, the build quality will be OH so much better than before, and sales will be through the roof. Yeahright.

I’ve never owned a GM (or Chrysler) product because there are others out there with better quality. It doesn’t appear that I’ll be buying one anytime soon either.

If you want to buy American, buy a Ford.

Mac

April 1st, 2009
10:31 am

To those Chevy fans on the school bus in south Georgia in the 1970s: HA! Ford won!

Murphy McMurpherson

April 1st, 2009
10:34 am

Condolences and congratulations.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
10:51 am

I’ll ask any of you, if you had GM to run and you were from the government and could print money and make any law, what would YOU do with GM? It’s a pretty fun train set, if you have a taste for that kind of power.

Seriously, what would you do with it?

Gregg

April 1st, 2009
10:59 am

Big Bucks GOP in this one Paragraph you disproved what Wooten was saying. “G.M.’s new chief executive, Fritz Henderson, also said that the
pressure from the government pushed the automaker closer to bankruptcy.
“By no later than June 1, if we’re not able to accomplish this outside
bankruptcy, we’ll be in bankruptcy,” he said at a news conference in
Detroit on Tuesday.” He doesn’t sound like someone hand picked by the Obama Admin to me. Wooten your rocking chair is calling you!

Shar

April 1st, 2009
11:10 am

Outside of fleet trucks like the Ford F-10, the top selling passenger cars in the United States have consistently been small and moderate sedans such as Toyota’s Camry and Corolla and Honda’s Civic and Accord. Not an SUV, as you drive, Mr. Wooten, nor a minivan, as I do, in the top ten. Your argument that “the Left” (and didn’t I see you inveighing against “liberals’” use of group terms to denigrate the opposing point of view? For shame!) has somehow schemed to snatch government control of General Motors in order to force the production of only small cars is specious. Small cars sell, even if they do not sell to you or to me.

General Motors has seen the trend toward small cars for decades, and has resisted it mightily. Management has ceded the small car market, but tried to use government sanctions and regulations to tilt the competitive field to favor large vehicles and disfavor foreign-made cars. Rivers of lobbying money has gone to protect anything made on a truck chassis (read: SUV) from inclusion in CAFE standards, to put off tightening those fuel economy levels despite the national importance of reducing oil dependency, to pass off ultimate pension and benefit responsibility to the taxpayer, to find exemptions, earmarks, special tax treatment and on and on. Rather than trying to produce cars that can compete in quality and price to the nationally-subsidized imports, GM has pursued a strategy of emphasizing larger vehicles that sell fewer units but realize a higher margin. They stubbornly held to this direction regardless of the market’s rejection, and have lost market share for more than a decade to producers of smaller cars.

That poor decision-making and stubborn insistence has left the company bankrupt, not amorphous machinations of “the Left”. Like you, I am uncomfortable with the government making direct decisions for private industry and would greatly have preferred allowing the market to prevail and both GM and Chrysler to either radically restructure or go under. However, the social cost of the loss of jobs, both for those primary companies and for their suppliers, has been deemed to be unacceptable. As a member of the recently laid off, I can understand the reluctance to put that many more families’ support at risk. However, taxpayer funding to private industry requires that those industries to change ‘business as usual’, since business as usual drove them into the ground. Since the existing management refused to make those changes, the government, on behalf of the taxpayer, must. A ghastly option, to be sure, but better than pouring more money into the hands of people who have consistently made bad decisions.

Lee

April 1st, 2009
11:12 am

“Government will destroy General Motors. Nobody wants to buy a car from the Post Office.”

Best line of the week right there.

The sad thing, GM seems to have turned the corner on quality and has been producing some pretty good vehicles the past few years. If you bought GM, the 80’s definitely were not ‘the good old days.’

In the long run, the government seizing control of GM and driving it to the ground might be the best ammunition against the current trend of socialism/nationalism. Might make a few corporate bigwigs think twice before running to Washington with their hands out.

But I doubt it….

Gregg

April 1st, 2009
11:23 am

Wooten make fun of Smith and Wesson for and the liberals for wanting gun safety and training. Talk about not wanting to be responsible or held responsible for any problems. His argument is like saying people boycott an auto dealer for advocating Driver’s training for teenagers. I mean we should just eliviate that pesky little background check thing too. If you support that then you should have your NRA card ripped up. Hell let everyone get guns and not train them. that would just be soooo much fun watching people getting robbed and killed because they didn’t understand there was a safety feature on the gun.

Algonquin J. Calhoun

April 1st, 2009
11:27 am

This whole rescue operation was forced upon Obama by the idiocy of George W. Hitler and the irresponsible spending of the Republinazi party. Now, you and other clods take shots and criticize but we all know you have no ideas. Those who can do and those who can’t criticize. Capitalism was killed by the things that made it great-greed and avarice. The sun is setting on this deplorable philosophical nightmare. Rail all you care to Jim. Drive your SUV and load your S&W. The day of the Republinazi is done!

DJ

April 1st, 2009
11:37 am

Yeah, sure, Algonquin Roundtable. Capitalism is dead. Sure. And your least favorite president killed it. Sure. And everybody who disagrees with you should be gagged and “can’t criticize” your idiotic analysis.

You bloody fool, you’ve got the sun setting upon a nightmare. You are the Ted Bundy of mixed metaphors. Like we’re really going to listen to you.

Jake

April 1st, 2009
11:43 am

I lived in Flint in the mid-70’s and knew a guy that worked at the Blazer plant. He was a reliever covering lunch and breaks for 4 guys on the line. Since they each got a 30 minute lunch and 2 15 minute breaks his work day was work 4 hours get paid for 8. Every winter he would get a faKe doctor’s excuse and go on sick leave. While he made money on the side plowing out Businesses with his Blazer he was drawing 90% of his pay from GM on sick leave and short-term disability. GM DESTROYED THEMSELVES A LONG TIME AGO!

Gregg

April 1st, 2009
11:46 am

DJ do you even know the role of government in a capitalistic system? Government should not allow the market to fail and if they BELIEVE that something will cost that then they have to intervene. The talking head gets people on the right to believe that what is going on is over-reaching but it is the governments role to right the market because as you know the market does not always correct itself. by the way if capitalism was killed by OUR favorite president how do you explian the DOW yesterday?

Jackie

April 1st, 2009
11:49 am

When the so-called conservatives rush to the console the “liberals” everyone should step back and collect their survival-gear because there will be much unpleasant air pollution spread.

GM used market analysis to determine what vehicles to sell. The results they found is most wanted large trucks, SUV’s and the infamous Hummer. Further, the American public ignored their Chevy Cavalier, the Buick and the Volt.

ConservativeAnchor

April 1st, 2009
11:59 am

GM has 20 brands of which 11 are profitable. They are Silveradoes, Tahoes, Suburbans, etc. Why? Because it is impractical to put a family of four into a Prius or a Obozoveo and travel to Grandma’s up I-85 through four states.

I blame Wagoneer, the UAW bosses, and shareholders. The UAW average worker will lose and GM is one for the history books.

Right now the Hummer is the #1 selling vehicle in Iraq among those who are capable of buying them.

The Liberals are going to stick it into the throats of every worker in this nation. I feel for you. Seriously!

Tyree

April 1st, 2009
12:05 pm

GM has problems. Here’s my list. Too many brands to sustain ,thus overlapping models, heavy reliance on trucks and suvs, a bloated dealer network,virtual non existence in the small car market, a burdensome heavy UAW entitlement on wages and health care, too many arrogant white collar managers, a tarnished image in the market place, angry taxpayers that refuse to buy their product because the are on the government dole, and finally they have not made a profit in years. Maybe the push from the government is exactly what they need to help fix some the wrongs.

rico

April 1st, 2009
12:07 pm

And now it seems as PRZBO is making marketing decisions for the Big 2;

‘Obama tells GM/Dodge to pull out of NASCAR at the end of the 2009 season ‘

The man is a marketing Helen Keller.

Tomhere

April 1st, 2009
12:17 pm

Conservatives had control of the U.S. Government for the past eight years and look what came of it: NOTHING POSITIVE – ALL NEGATIVE.
If you people had any GOOD ideas wouldn’t you have used them by now? What happened? Did you have some ideas that you just couldn’t get done? NO.
You had your shot. You did your thing. The results are in: YOU FAILED.
REAGANOMICS is a FAILED PHILOSOPHY. Just like Reagan’s term in the Whitehouse, it belongs on the TRASH HEAP OF HISTORY. DONE. OVER. FINITO.
Now you keep trying to sell us the same tired crap. OVer and Over, like you’ve got no brain at all, which we already knew after watching the results of the past eight years.
SO: NO THANK YOU.
THE ELECTION IS OVER.
YOU LOST.
SHUT UP.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
12:20 pm

@ Jake

I really like what you wrote. I’m pro-union, myself, but I’ll tell you that one of the dirty secrets in my trade is that schoolteachers get paid not to work. Unions, good. Union-ISM, bad.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
12:25 pm

Gregg, I’m glad that you too have read Leuchtenburg, so that we have a common frame of reference. OK. But you already know that our challenge as a People is to ballance in calipers: free trade viz the collective, as even our great Constitution pits individual sovereignty against massing property interests. Our nation is designed to war within. Sorry, but it’s the best they could do.

So now we still war–I hope civilly this time.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
12:28 pm

BTW, I really appreciate the smart, sensible comments about the auto industry and what to do with it. The remarks make so much sense, and I think I’m learning a lot. Feels good. Feels hopeful.

jt

April 1st, 2009
12:41 pm

You people will buy a GM auto, IF it’s the only one affordable or available. at this point, that’s pretty easy for obama to make happen.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
12:44 pm

Huh, jt? You really think Obama’s Kim Jong Il, that he can dictat[e] that only one brand of vehicle? WTF?

Boycott Spain

April 1st, 2009
1:09 pm

“LONDON (Reuters) – Demonstrators clashed with riot police and smashed bank windows in Britain’s financial center on Wednesday in protest against a system they said had robbed the poor to benefit the rich.”

Silly little radical left wing liberal terrorists. Yeah, we’ve got those wastoids over here, too. What every nation ought to do is round up these radicals and let’s all ship them to some large remote island somewhere and then let them live amongst their own kind if they think they have the answers to everything – for those who hate freedoms to pursue happiness, success, and capitalism.

And, once again, the media is silent on the incompetence of the Obama administration. Giethner The Tax Cheat once again opened his mouth and the market reacted accordingly. This time, he stated that an international currency wouldn’t be a bad idea as thought up by the Chinese; the dollar tanked. Team-O came to the rescue – AGAIN – and clarified that it would not happen or the US would not support it. Where’s the media?

Where’s the media on THIS outrage?

“This new legislation, the “Pay for Performance Act of 2009,” would impose government controls on the pay of all employees — not just top executives — of companies that have received a capital investment from the U.S. government. It would, like the tax measure, be retroactive, changing the terms of compensation agreements already in place. And it would give Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner extraordinary power to determine the pay of thousands of employees of American companies.”

America, are you waking up yet?

Now from an international perspective, we must boycott Spain if they follow through with this:

“New York – A top Spanish court has moved toward starting a probe of six former Bush administration officials including ex-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales in connection with alleged torture of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, The New York Times said on Saturday.”

What the media FAILS to tell you is that the conspirator of this idea is a Spanish terrorist who was arrested and spent many years in jail for kidnapping and extortion. He went on to get a law degree while in jail. Again, where’s the media here? Didn’t Spain get bombed by the very radicals they are claiming were tortured in Gitmo? This is just absolutely incredible.

What the hell is the world coming to under this radical leftism?

Boycott Spain

April 1st, 2009
1:11 pm

“YOU LOST. SHUT UP”. – Tomhere

Why don’t you MAKE US, prissypants libtard?

Don

April 1st, 2009
1:12 pm

Uh, Jim…..I don’t think GM needs any help from the US Government to be destroyed. GM seems to be doing a first-rate job of destroying itself without Uncle Sam’s help.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
1:13 pm

One of the several weird things about this f@#ed up site is that if you want to complain about, for example, the spastic server or the mystifying censorship of controversial posts or the correspondent’s inability to set things in itallics or bold face, then you have to go to the Complaints Department, below, which is a hollow shell. It simply doesnt’ work. Posts mailed there don’t post.

The AJC is such a cynical cabbal of Sophomore interns assured that they know more than anybody and are moving the Nation toward a Bright New Dawn whether we know it or not. And yet they cannot perform the simplest tasks.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
1:22 pm

Let that then stand as a perfect metaphor for the direction of this counry.

CPA

April 1st, 2009
1:25 pm

Report: Social Security surplus gone by 2010
Higher unemployment is hurting the Social Security trust fund, which relies on contributions from workers. A Congressional Budget Office report predicts that the fund’s surplus will be eliminated by next year, 10 years ahead of previous projections. The drop-off means the U.S. has had to abandon the practice of borrowing from the fund and will now be forced to borrow from other countries.

C. Lee

April 1st, 2009
1:27 pm

It is interesting to see how easy it is to cast blame for some on the right (now out of power after having squandered their chance at fixing things). Gov’t will ruin GM. GM ruined GM. They waited until the last possible moment to even TRY to adapt to electrics and hybrids. Spent all their time and effort getting people to buy the biggest and baddest instead of getting ahead of the curve. Give Ford credit for at least eating their crow early. Now, they don’t have to have it rammed down their throats.

As far as what would I do with GM if I had the money to buy it (or all the banks and AIG for that matter), I say this. Let’s transform these businesses the same way we want to transform the environment and the electrical grid and education –> with an eye toward the future, not the past. Most companies come to a point where they have to retool, redesign, reset and reconnect witht heir customers. What better time than now? GM & Ford could spend these two years preparing to be dominant in what is still going to be 1 of the 2 biggest markets in the world for new cars. Instead of crying about what was, do what’s necessary to survive and thrive in what is essential a new marketplace with new marketplace conditions? When did these people who are supposed to be CEO’s with business degrees and business plans stop doing what they’re TRAINED & PAID to do???
DON’T BLAME THE GOV’T. Incompetance is wide spread, along with the greed and lack of oversight in this sandwich. Unfortunately, the “bread” is LONG GONE!

DJ

April 1st, 2009
1:53 pm

Do any of you understand that this blog is monitored, such that content displeasing of the newspaper’s management is culled out and killed? Do you in fact realize this? If you don’t–if you doubt me–then try it. Try posting whatever you think is the diametric opposite of the reigning libline, and just see what happens. You don’t care now, when those in control are singing your own sweet airs, but later, when things change…

Jackie

April 1st, 2009
1:54 pm

News reports indicate that Honda is cutting production and salaries.
That should indicate the problem with the economy is not only the American automobile manufacturer but that of ALL auto manufacturers.

For those that will try to see this as indicative of union problems, the Japanese have one of the strongest unions in the world. Most business analysts indicate the reason for the foreign manufacturers moving to the USA is because of our education level, worker efficiency, low wages and overhead. After all, the USA still equals to 25% of the world’s economy.

Makes good business sense, wouldn’t you think?

Glenn

April 1st, 2009
1:57 pm

Ragnar, @@, & me: we’re all

Glenn

April 1st, 2009
1:58 pm

…quitting this site. We’ll leave it to those approved by the inane subalterns at the AJC.

Redneck Convert

April 1st, 2009
2:05 pm

Well, I doh’t know the reason why Wooten is bringing up junk like Smith & Wesson to make his point. The things won’t hardly stop nothing. If you want to be the biggest and baddest in these parts you will buy a couple machine guns and a anti-tank weapon like I did. For hunting and self defense, you understand.

Anyhow, I’m mighty proud Ford will keep making the Ford F-450 pickup. Which is the closest thing to a Bradley tank you can get. Ford don’t need no guvmint handout. Us rednecks will keep the co. doing good for years to come. Let old fat people like Sister Dusty tool around in these toy cars.

But my buddy Jim Earl is a mite worryed. He bought a Silverado a couple years ago and it’s still in warranty. If something goes wrong with it does he just send the repair bill to Obama c/o of the White House if GM is in bankruptcy?

One thing’s for sure, if guvmint is in the car business anything they make will cost twice as much and start leaking oil and transmission fluid within a month. I sure wouldn’t want no guvmint bureaucrat looking under the hood and charging twice as much as a reglar mechanic and making me wait two years for a oil change.

The librul Democrats been in office less than three months and they already ruint the car business. If they take over the beer business I’ll have to find another job. It’s for sure I ain’t going to be a shiftless guvmint worker. I got pride, you know.

Have a good day everybody.

Glenn

April 1st, 2009
2:09 pm

I personally will miss my friends Dusty, AmVet, Charles, Jackie, and get–whatever happened to him. Sorry, guys, it’s time to leave. My dad was a jazz trumpeter who placed a premium on a fella’s knowing when to leave…

Bye, y’all!

Peter

April 1st, 2009
2:38 pm

HA HA HA……… Jim the Flip Flopper, who did say………“A clean bankruptcy would have been better for GM and for the nation.”….Now states………”Poor General Motors employees. Their company is likely to be the first victim of the government’s effort to pick industrial winners and losers.”

Hey Jim…… If say GM ran in the Black, and the company did the “Right Thing”….like make money and not loose money…….. you would be talking about what today ?

By Jim….time to go where the old horses go……Wake up smell the coffee……. I guess it is OK to bail them out selectively ?

david wayne osedach

April 1st, 2009
2:42 pm

When I worked at Smith & Wesson in the 70’s they couldn’t make enough guns to keep up with domestic demand. International sales were carefully allocated. Now the company dependson their international sales.

RedClay Birdawg

April 1st, 2009
2:49 pm

I get so tired of hearing how American Consumers do not want fuel efficient vehicles. Toyota and Honda have steadily been increasing their market share on the strength of these exact type of models. The truth is American manufacturers consistantly spent their R&D $’s on Trucks & SUVs. It shows in the quality of their products which are superior than that of their Japanese counterparts whithin that segment and the inferior quality in smaller vehicles. As a former non union GM employee I would gladly take the Pespi challenge against Toyota’s, Honda’s, and Nissan’s full size trucks & SUV’s, although competing against their smaller compact line was a different story altogether. I believe the UAW broke the back of the American manufacturers creating a legacy cost that forced GM, Ford, Chrysler and Dodge to continue building vehicles with higher profit margins to cover these costs. The Unions have acted like a spoiled child for too long and have now bitten off the hand that has fed them, rather well, for too long.

Algonquin J. Calhoun

April 1st, 2009
2:57 pm

Hey DJ(Dumb Jerk), it’s over chump! Your Republinazi fuhrer put the finishing touches on the strangulation of capitalism. That system has proved as ineffective and unfair as any ever devised. The decline started with that old fool Reagan and has accelerated with every Republinazi to leave his stench in the White House. It’s a new day, even for swine such as yourself!

Tyree

April 1st, 2009
2:59 pm

The government will only sustain GM hopefully until they once again become a viable company.The following are anybody’s guess. How long will that take? Plus what will be the ultimate cost to the taxpayer?

Algonquin J. Calhoun

April 1st, 2009
2:59 pm

They’re watching you Dumb Jerk. Have you ever been diagnosed as a paranoid? I suspect you have. Take the meds swine!

Good

April 1st, 2009
3:01 pm

GM should have thought of this years ago when they were making crappy cars and paying to much for labor. Now they are making changes when they are in trouble. Sorry, it’s thier fault.

Churchill's MOM

April 1st, 2009
3:22 pm

Jim, they have taken you off the home page but left that Bookman guy, what’s up?

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
3:47 pm

Jim’s a doctor, dammit Churchill, not a journalist. And stop calling him bones.

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
3:57 pm

Bookman mishandled the Cato survey today on his blog. I could rewrite his blog over here and prove what dog’s BFF this clown really is, but, why should I? He’d then just hack the style and pretend he thought of it, the no good, lyin’, dirty, material stealing, yellah piece of renegade trash! If this idiot gets on CNN too many times and goes national, then it could mark the end of the beginning of the end of the rise of the rear guard of anal-retentive liberalism like the kind Bookman spreads so cheekily, (with both hands). He gets everything wrong, and he’ll make liberals look like maurading gay renegades. There can’t be a God, when a total malaprop and Schmoehawk-challenged bad hair day like Bookman is heard or seen by anone. And I can’t get on at the Punchline? Give me an F’n break. Bookman! BOOKMAN!!!

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
4:04 pm

Leaving? Don’t let the door hit you on your rear-cleavage, Clyde.

Dusty

April 1st, 2009
4:10 pm

Glenn Glenn Glenn

Wha’samatter wid you? YOU CANNOT LEAVE US! This is April Fools Day but you must not fool me. That’s it, isn’t it? You are just foolin’?

Is California already calling? And surely Ragnar will appear again with a picture included. And @@ desert us? The only NON-liberal lifeboat left at AJC and you three would jump overboard? No No….I say..NO NO !!!

Jim’s blog is just paddling upstream. He’s working in enemy territory. We can’t desert him. I know most conservatives are busy working as opposed to libs. Maybe we can get the RNC to pay a few folks to come here like the dems pay Churchill’s Mom to discredit Palin.

Or maybe we can get Jim to go “Pffttt”" to the Georgia Assembly. Then he could call Obama’s glitzy goofups what they are MORE OFTEN. Then all the ol’ lib lodgers of multiple posts at Bookman’s would come here and present their repetitious rants. I know. Bad company. But we already have PoFoBroe so we can take it!

Now tell me you were joking, Glenn. Please….

Churchill's MOM

April 1st, 2009
4:52 pm

Dusty what makes you think I’m a Democrat.. I am a lifelong Republican.. too bad you don’t understand what a Republican is..

Chris Broe

April 1st, 2009
4:54 pm

Newt Gingrich is shaping himself right now into an icon. A smart neo-con; an i-con. He seems the crown prince of i-conservatism, doesn’t he? I’d like to know everything he’s done with the Saudi Royal Family this past year.

The Saudis are an important ally to the United States. Their spin on our respect for Islam is the most positive that Islam can form about Christianity, (thanks to Bush so obsequiously bugging out from Saudi Arabia at the Royal Family’s bequest), especially now that we’ve planted our flag on the Temple Mount and all. By withdrawing from Saudi Arabia, and getting our troops dis-embarked on the shortest possible timetable, Bush stated what the mission of US Troops in Iraq was: To show Islam that Americans will die to protect Sunni and Shia, (the best of both worlds), from Fascism.

Why this could be the end days: Islam is a Socio-theological Religion. All religions are born into a sociology, but religions should never be born from their sociology, the way Islam was. Islam is a sociological invention. Religion necessarily invents Sociology, but Sociology should not invent Religion. You cant logically infer a God from arbitrary tribal myths, diets, customs and feuds.

The fact that Islam accepts the reality of a historical Jesus Christ is the best hope we have for peace with them. Mohammad invented Islam by embracing the bond uniting all the tribes: their socio-cultural evolution as Caucasus Mountain People, (who all retained similar social orders especially the total submissiveness of women). It also helped that he was recruiting people who love to hate the Kurds and the Jews (and all women). Don’t you find it odd that both the Torah and the Koran have an equivalent kosher? That’s part of the religion, and that’s why it so hard to prove that there’s any chosen people over the fact that all of mankind is the chosen people. Native American Tribal names are all variations on the “Chosen ones”. It’s human to think that we’re number one, but it should be separate from religion.

The bad news: The Islamic population we face in Iran and Iraq can’t be separated from their historical geopolitics. They’d want war with the west for secular reasons as motivating as Islam. The good news: Jesus Christ in the Koran means that we have hope for peace with Islam.

Twitter: Think for yourself. Others cant explain the economy. Others cant explain the mission of our troops in Iraq. Be your own American. Follow or Lead. Our leaders have degraded themselves beyond being even the flower of our followers.

Newt Gingrich converted to Catholicism! I like his choice and it is for that reason, and only that reason, that he has my full support. I just think the planet is overpopulated, and a long 100 years war with Islam is just what we need. Elect Newt.

Newt ‘12: Change your mind first.

Cracking the 666 Antichrist code. Christ spoke Aramaic. The translated Greek Acronym for Christ is icxc, or 9990 in Roman Numerals. icxc becomes like an emoticon. (All acronyms become emoticons eventually). Why Roman Numerals? Because the Roman crucified him. But even without that, the catholic mass got translated into Latin.

ic = 99

xc = 90

9990 (put side by side, like the acronym/emoticon.

Where the proof becomes just a hot parlor trick: Roman Numerals dont have an ic for a 99. You have to bend the rules when you subtract one from one hundred to get ninety nine, instead of (I think) . 9990? You can also break rules write 999 as IM. Instant Message. im. M is a thousand and you’re supposed to just subtract one (i). And the words say, “I am”. That’s at least relevant.

So the upside down 666 or 999 both take you to Christ, sort of.

However, this is as close to proving who the Antichrist is that I’ve ever seen. And this proof has been available since Gutenberg, man.

Catholics are Cool. Vote for Newt in ‘12.

DJ

April 1st, 2009
5:08 pm

No, no, wooten’s chickelenslops, one at a time and with spectacularly courageous anonymity, are driving this humiliating mess.

Dusty

April 1st, 2009
5:52 pm

What’s a chickelenslops? Sounds like something in the backyard of a liberal.

Glenn

April 1st, 2009
9:55 pm

chickenslops, I say. Dammit.

Dusty

April 1st, 2009
10:08 pm

If a chickenslops pops, what chicken pops such slop? Ah…the eternal question…wherefore art thou?

[...] Jim Wooten on some Smith & Wesson lessons for GM. [...]

OJ

April 9th, 2009
9:51 am

If GM did not produce the cars the liberals wanted, because consumers want other cars: Why didn’t they buy them? This is a really stupid line of argumentation…. I think it is time to admit that GM failed to address customer needs – otherwise they would have sold their cars. It’s that simple.

Add your comment