Lawd, The War ain’t over. Nearly 148 years after he torched Atlanta, Gen. William Sherman has been abducted.
Someone boosted a portrait of the Union leader from the Marietta Museum of History where it had been hanging, where else? Over a urinal in the men’s room.
The filched item was just a copy of the portrait, not a pricey antique, and museum director Jan Galt Russell said they would have been happy to provide a copy to the thief, had he or she requested one.
“It’s ridiculous,” said Russell. She hadn’t yet thought about amnesty should the culprit wish to come clean, say, in an Appomattox-style surrender. ”It’s very, very sad.”
The museum, on the Marietta Square, was once the Kennesaw House hotel, where Union spies spent a night before stealing The General, a locomotive that traveled between Atlanta and Chattanooga in those days. The Rebs caught up with the Yankees after they commandeered it at Big Shanty, now known as Kennesaw, where The General resides today at the Southern Museum of Civil War and Locomotive History.
In April, a capacity crowd known colloquially as OMs (Old Mariettans) packed the historic Strand Theatre for a re-premiere of “The Great Locomotive Chase.” The Disney film about the Confederate railroad victory debuted for the first time at the Strand in 1956, and by the second go-round it seemed like the town had moved beyond the late unpleasantness.
“I have come to embrace my Yankee brethren,” quipped Mayor Steve Tumlin, who is known, also colloquially, as Thunder.
And now this.
“Of all the random things,” Russell sighed. “It’s a silly thing to steal. I guess it’s somebody getting their revenge.”
97 comments Add your comment
Coat hangers & Sawdust
July 31st, 2012
4:36 pm
Lawd?
What is lawd?
Slim Junction Pedalmaster
July 31st, 2012
4:38 pm
Lawd? What is lawd?
Susie Q
August 1st, 2012
9:16 am
Obviously the person posting the question in the previous comment, is not Southern. lol. Maybe they stole his pic because the were offended that was over a urinal. JK
It ain't over
August 1st, 2012
9:36 am
Maybe they were out of toilet paper in the men’s room. Sherman’s portrait would have been a fitting substitute.
gtt
August 1st, 2012
10:10 am
Ridiculous? Not just sad, but very very sad? It was a prank, lady.Lighten up. Geez.
road warrior
August 1st, 2012
1:37 pm
it would be appropriate if they burned the portrait
Coat hangers & Sawdust
August 1st, 2012
2:26 pm
Still no help with the definition of “lawd”.
KatyWatts
August 1st, 2012
4:23 pm
LAWD is LORD with a very terrible southern accent.
Mr. Ed
August 1st, 2012
4:24 pm
Mebbe, the ghost of Sherman himself took it. How would you feel if a potrait of yourself was hanging over a urinal? First, you’d have to deal with the… ummmmh… view of your guest and then the odor.
Not that we condone theft, but… « The Grit Tree
August 1st, 2012
4:27 pm
[...] Can’t say I am too upset about this. [...]
Quint
August 1st, 2012
4:31 pm
To all you southern haters, Sherman came to Atlanta and kicked Stonewall Jackson, Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee in the A$$$$! So get over it!!!!!!!!!!!!
a
SSB
August 1st, 2012
4:32 pm
If they recover it they should return it to it’s “appropriate” place of resident….over the urinal!
Dean Tate
August 1st, 2012
4:33 pm
I still flinch every time I see a Yankee light a match.
brin
August 1st, 2012
4:33 pm
Good riddance..he was a drunk anyway and a murderer…
Son of Sammy Davis Jr, Jr
August 1st, 2012
4:33 pm
Next to George Washing ton, General Sherman is by far the most honorable, distinguished, and accomplished General to ever set foot in Georgia. I can only hope that his portrait is found in its original location and moved to a more secured location; preferably placed in the Georgia Statehouse.
jbyoung
August 1st, 2012
4:33 pm
Did we forget the Sherman burnt down Atlanta?!!! A bathroom is the only place his face should be shown. Thank you to whoever snagged that peice of….. art!
Ian
August 1st, 2012
4:34 pm
Hey, Quint. Neither Lee nor Jackson had commands in the Atlanta campaign.
urban redneck
August 1st, 2012
4:37 pm
Lawd. you know like “O M Lawd!!” C’mon people.
piss on sherman.
NotYou
August 1st, 2012
4:38 pm
Yankees like “Quint” are exactly why it “ain’t over”. Y’all are irritating beyond belief.
JeffG
August 1st, 2012
4:39 pm
GOOD!!!
He was a Butcher who was lauded for fighting boys as he killed women and children during his march through GA. A real hero. NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Although in America today he probably would be.
Mihael Conner
August 1st, 2012
4:39 pm
Quint, you have obviously not had the benefit of a full five years of schooling. Jackson was dead, Lee was in Virginia and Dais was not even fighting. Your ignorance of history is only matched by your bad grammar. You probably also forgot eoderant this morning. (sorry, that just slipped out)
Michael Conner
August 1st, 2012
4:41 pm
The sadness of not proofreading my own comment. Sigh
P Leary
August 1st, 2012
4:43 pm
“To all you southern haters, Sherman came to Atlanta and kicked Stonewall Jackson, Jefferson Davis and Robert E. Lee in the A$$$$! So get over it!!!!!!!!!!!!”
Never did much reading about the war did you? Actually never read anything except this story…correct?
JeffG
August 1st, 2012
4:45 pm
He kicked their A$$ if you count fighting 10 and 12 and 14 year olds. He was literally the scum of the earth. He murdered children.
Son of Sammy Davis Jr, Jr
August 1st, 2012
4:50 pm
@ Jeff G
I’m not sure if Sherman killed women and children as he marched to the sea and made Georgia howl. I am sure that the number of women and children that was killed during slavery in Georgia would be greater.
Here's your sign
August 1st, 2012
4:51 pm
Sherman faced Johnston and then Hood. Then proceeded to burn a swath thru Georgia. I believe he called it “Reaping the Whirlwind”. He was not an abolitionist and many black people perished trying to follow his army. FYI- he was commandant at a Military Academy in Louisiana when the war started. I don’t think he was a war hero. He believed in “Total War”, very much like Hitler. Sorry to burst some folks bubbles. Google it if you don’t believe me.
Roekest
August 1st, 2012
4:54 pm
I’ve always been in favor of burning down Atlanta again to honor the great General William T. Sherman. Hey, if it works to make forests lush again, shouldn’t it work in this pit?
Son of Sammy Davis Jr, Jr
August 1st, 2012
4:57 pm
@ P Leary
Jeff Davis, Stonewall Jackson, and Robert E. Lee were all in Virginia. General Joseph E. Johnson and General John Bell Hood were in Georgia,
You really should watch Ken Burns mini-series on The Civil War.
RealTalk
August 1st, 2012
4:59 pm
Respectfully to all the Atlantans on here reading but…. Sherman Can Burn in Hell. I am sure he probally is…. Good for him. Yankee POS.
Son of Sammy Davis Jr, Jr
August 1st, 2012
4:59 pm
@ P Leary
Jeff Davis, Stonewall Jackson, and Robert E. Lee were all in Virginia. General Joseph E. Johnson and General John Bell Hood were in Georgia.
You really should watch Ken Burns mini-series on The Civil War.
RealTalk
August 1st, 2012
4:59 pm
Respectfully to all the Atlantans on here reading but…. Sherman Can Burn in Hell. I am sure he probably is…. Good for him. Yankee POS.
Abe
August 1st, 2012
5:00 pm
Think this thought through, logically:
Slavery was indeed awful and this country would be much better off it never had happened.
Prof
August 1st, 2012
5:00 pm
By late 1864 when Sherman made his March to the Sea, BOTH sides had 14 and 15 year old children fighting in their armies.
Thanks to Son of Sammy Davis, Jr., Jr. for reminding us of a few other historical realities.
And I have to say that, although my great, great-grandfather was a Union Captain and POW, I found this news story in its entirety hilarious.
Festus
August 1st, 2012
5:04 pm
Lawdie what ignorance. Gawd, Sherman never went up against Stonewall Jackson or Bobby Lee. He went up against Joe Johnson. Over near Poncie and Juniper this is a historical marker that states that James Andrews who lead the locomotive chase for the scalawags was hung in 1864. A fond memory for me since the ladies of the evening on that corner used to give me the box car special.
Atlanta native
August 1st, 2012
5:04 pm
The CSA lost, but they had fewer casualties than the North. Considering the North held at least a 2 to 1 advantage and sometimes a 3 to 1 advantage in troop numbers and almost all the manufacturing capabilities to wage war that is hardly an ass whipping.
Uncle Billy
August 1st, 2012
5:09 pm
General Sherman was a commander in the United States Army. Joe Johnston and John Bell Hood (the “Yellow Rose of Texas”) were officers in the Confederate States Army having resigned their commissions in the U.S. Army. Who were the traitors who made war on the United States for four years? Seem quite simple to me.
Donna P.
August 1st, 2012
5:12 pm
May he be burning in Hell as we speak!!
Uncle Billy
August 1st, 2012
5:12 pm
The Confederate States lost the War and there has been no attempt to revive the fight for slavery. There never will be. There should have never been. Google the “Ordinance of Secession” for any Southern state. They were not at all ambiguous about why they thought secession was necessary.
Uncle Billy
August 1st, 2012
5:15 pm
Festus, it was US Grant who defeated Lee. The Army of Northern Virginia suffered the highest casualty rate of any Army during that War.
Uncle Billy
August 1st, 2012
5:15 pm
Donna, where is Hell exactly? Can your GPS system locate it?
Astrid G.
August 1st, 2012
5:21 pm
Poster at 4:50 – Yes, some slaves were treated abominably. Not many were killed though, since they were considered valuable property (sounds horrible, but true).
Atlanta native
August 1st, 2012
5:22 pm
Abe you are correct but consider this…..The nation who was first to develop repulsion for slavery and eventually abolish slavery was the USA. What is uniquely Western is not slavery but the movement to abolish slavery. That does not mean that western slave traders were justified in what they did, but placing all the blame on them is forgetting what Africans did to their own. To this day, too many Africans believe that the African slave trade was an USA aberration and not their own invention. By the time the slave trade was abolished in the West, there were many more slaves in Africa (black slaves of black owners) than in the Americas.
Here's your sign
August 1st, 2012
5:23 pm
William T. Sherman was a proponent of total war (much like Hitler). Grant and Sherman’s plan was to divide and destroy the south. They succeeded. Sherman was not an abolitionist and in fact was a commandant at a Louisiana Military Academy when the war started. Famous quotes from him are “they shall reap the whirlwind” and “Make the south Howl”.
Sherman faced Johnston first and then Hood. Sherman had used flanking manuevers to cause Johnston to fall back. Sherman began a long series of flanking manuevers after Kennesaw Mountain (which Sherman lost). In west Georgia his forces were mauled greatly by the confederates. Sherman changed his tactics to stay close to his supply base and pushed on to Marietta and Atlanta. Fed up with Johnston’s withdrawals Davis put Hood in command. Hood promptly destroyed the confederate forced defending Atlanta (remember Hood is a confederate general). After Hood’s fiascos all he could do was take his remaining forces and push towards Tennessee hoping to draw Sherman with him. Sherman did not follow Hood. With no organized force to oppose him Sherman began his “total war” campaign. Many African Americans may feel Sherman was a great man but he did not care for the plight of the slaves. He wanted to destroy Georgia and present Lincoln with Savannah before the presidential election (which was in doubt for Lincoln). His present helped re-elect Lincoln. It should also be noted that slaves followed Sherman during his “March to the Sea” and a great many of them perished because of Sherman. You can adolize him if you want but the facts are he was a good general but also a butcher of children and women (both black and white). Sorry to ruin anyone’s fantasy.
Bobby Lee
August 1st, 2012
5:24 pm
Before you put Sherman up on a pedestal he was, by today’s definition, a terrorist. He dealt widespread violence all the way to Savannah. There was no point to it other than humiliation. Did we deserve it? A few. But the rich had fled and the poor paid the price, as happens all too often in history.
Astrid G.
August 1st, 2012
5:24 pm
As for which side lost the most people – every Southern family I know can name relatives who died in the Civil War. No Yankee friend can name a one.
Make em Howl
August 1st, 2012
5:38 pm
Oooooowwwuuuuuuuuuu !!
DebDoes
August 1st, 2012
5:56 pm
Obviously I never saw it being a girl and all…ohhhhh lawwwd! Perhaps it should have been hung over a water fountain instead. I hope this was the only thing ‘he’ took!
John Hall
August 1st, 2012
6:03 pm
I hope uncle billy comes back to find his portrait and brings all the yankees who caught southern fever. Maybe they can burn Atlanta down again and we can get rid of all the carpetbaggers and scalawags….
Donna P.
August 1st, 2012
6:06 pm
Uncle Billy, look down; that is where Hell is
Mike Geigerman
August 1st, 2012
6:09 pm
He was heartless and sent hundreds of Roswell women to complete estrangement from their lives and families .. had no effect on the outcome of the southern strategy. Done in the name of vengeance for a recently lost son. Urinal duty is where his eternity should have been.
Jeff S
August 1st, 2012
6:24 pm
Yes, Sherman was a ruthless warrior who inflicted as much damage on the enemy as possible, while always trying to minimize casualties of his own troops. He was willing to do what ever it took to end (and WIN) the war – things which would now get him crucified in the liberal media. I read somewhere that he said he would rather be responsible for the deaths of 100 enemy civilians than one of his own soldiers. Sherman was the kind of general I would want to lead me in war. And I am a southerner and a native Georgian.
St. Joan
August 1st, 2012
6:30 pm
Perhaps the portrait was in a really nice frame
Reb
August 1st, 2012
6:36 pm
I think it should be returned and used as a floor mat under the urinal.
youneverknow
August 1st, 2012
6:44 pm
That is one butt ugly man. Lawd indeed!
FMX
August 1st, 2012
6:45 pm
I understand that the Civil War is a part of our history but its celebrated too much. Some whites celebrate as if they actually won. I live in Kennesaw and everything is Confederacy this and Confederacy that. Honestly who gives a f*ck. The war is over and the south lost. Can we just move on. Southern white culture didn’t begin when Fort Sumter was attacked it was around long before then. The funny part is when blacks whine about slavery you all tell them not to dredge up the past but you want the losing confederate flag to hang over the capital and represent the state of Georgia. Whether the war was about slavery or not the two are forever intertwined. You can’t celebrate and honor one and try and sweep the other under the rug. We need to move on and celebrate how far we have come from those god awful days.
To Tell the Truth
August 1st, 2012
7:07 pm
Yeah FMX, and we can start with that Racist that currently is in the White House as Barry is done in November!!!!LMAO
trixie
August 1st, 2012
7:17 pm
What a sexy man! I’m going up to Marietta and get me a free picture.
Putting it over the urinal really makes sense. A group of confederates with proper training could beat back a fire just by using their bodily fluids.
Horsetoothedjackass
August 1st, 2012
7:40 pm
@FMX Delta is ready when you are…..
FMX
August 1st, 2012
7:48 pm
Horsetoothedjackass why should I go anywhere? This is as much my home as much as yours.
Son of Sammy Davis Jr, Jr
August 1st, 2012
8:02 pm
@ Astrid G. “August 1st Yes, some slaves were treated abominably. Not many were killed though, since they were considered valuable property (sounds horrible, but true)”
If you believe this meet me at Stone Mountain and I will sell you the biggest rock in Metro Atlanta at a price you will not believe
Prof
August 1st, 2012
8:06 pm
I’ve always understood that Sherman’s March to the Sea was mostly strategic: destroy the Confederate supply lines (railroads) and food supplies (agricultural crops) that went to the Confederate troops, demoralize the local populations so they would quit supplying
Prof
August 1st, 2012
8:16 pm
(Cont. Hit the wrong key!) 15 year old boys to fight–about all that were left at that point. The principle was rather like our bombing of Hiroshima in WW2 to end the war sooner.
And “Here’s your sign,” you forgot the other famous quote by Sherman: “War is hell.”
Bob Farrell
August 1st, 2012
8:22 pm
As a former resident of both Marietta and Kennesaw I also would have removed Uncle Billies image from any mens room It was and is insulting.
Would you still find the humor in it had it been replaced with Mars Robert ?? I think not
Prof
August 1st, 2012
8:29 pm
@ Here’s your sign, August 1st, 4:51 pm: “[Sherman] He was not an abolitionist and many black people perished trying to follow his army.”
I guess you could say that…. In 1863 Lincoln allowed blacks to join the Union army. Many black men joined, both freed men and runaway slaves; and they formed black regiments that played an important part in the Union attacks. They were generally known by the white Union generals as ferocious fighters because they knew that if captured they would be returned to slavery if not killed outright. There were many such Union regiments.
230gr Full Metal Jacket
August 1st, 2012
8:39 pm
The defense of Atlanta was rendered a lost cause as soon as the upper command ordered away the one man who Sherman truly feared facing in battle — Lt. Gen Nathan Bedford Forrest (my Great, Great, Great Grandfather!!!!). They left Gen. Forrest to fight in Western Tennessee and northern Alabama. He asked command to allow him to take his forces south to defend the railroad yards at Atlanta (which was the only reason Sherman came here in the first place), but was ordered to maintain his fight in the west instead. We still would have lost the war eventually, purely due to the industrial and manufacturing capabilities of the North at the time, but I feel safe in saying that Sherman would have never come anywhere near Atlanta if he had thought Forrest was here because he was openly terrified of him (as was repeatedly noted by many of his senior officers and by Gen. Grant) and he knew that Forrest had absolutely no problem with returning the favor and waging “total war” on the North. But, Gen. Lee being a southern gentleman (a trait which caused him to lose the war when he had it as good as won in 1863 but refused to destroy Washington DC and all of the politicians there) kept him reigned in and never allowed him to unleash the army of Tennessee on the northern states. All that being said, I feel that Sherman largely gets a bad rap from most folks in Georgia. You do know that more than a few of his senior staff officers were from Georgia, don’t you? That is why there are several smaller towns east of Atlanta (Monticello being one of the most note-worthy) that still have the beautiful antebellum homes — because Sherman spared those towns at the request of officers in his command who were from those places. But everything else got burned, which is exactly how you SHOULD wage war! I am a native Georgian and one side of my family has been in Atlanta since before it was named Marthasville (Lots of stuff around here still bears the Medlock name, which is my Mother’s side of the family), but Sherman didn’t do anything that WE shouldn’t have done to Washington DC and Maryland once we crossed the Potomac, and he should not be as reviled as he is. He was an outstanding strategist and understood that the only way to win was to completely defeat the south, otherwise they would face insurgent warfare for decades. I also find it ironic that he was absolutely appalled at the treatment given to the south during reconstruction. He had spent a large portion of his life among southerners and knew their spirit well, so he was not at all pleased with the vengeful attitude of most of his peers. He felt the war was over and we were all Americans again and that the focus should be on reconciliation instead of revenge. But most folks knowledge of the man stops with “He burned Atlanta, therefore he was a POS!”. Understandable, I suppose, but it doesn’t at all give the whole picture of a rather enigmatic man.
230gr Full Metal Jacket
August 1st, 2012
8:45 pm
Hey Prof, VERY good analogy comparing the purpose of Hiroshima and the burning of Atlanta. That is exactly why Sherman did what he did — to try and end the senseless slaughter as quickly as possible to minimize further loss of lives and property. I see you have studied your history well! Kudos!!
Son of Sammy Davis Jr, jr
August 1st, 2012
8:57 pm
@ 230gr Full Metal Jacket
Bedford Forest founded the Klu Klux Klan. There is no good in him.
Calvin G. Sims, Sr.
August 1st, 2012
9:05 pm
Quint
August 1st, 2012
4:31 pm
Sorry, but Robert E. Lee’s “Strong Right Arm,” Stonewall Jackson was dead by the time Sherman Burned Atlanta.
Prof
August 1st, 2012
9:21 pm
@ 230gr Full Metal Jacket.
While the fireworks begin to go off, I will provide a diversionary tactic by pointing out the inaccuracy of your statement: “Gen. Lee being a southern gentleman (a trait which caused him to lose the war when he had it as good as won in 1863 but refused to destroy Washington DC and all of the politicians there)….”
Sorry. It was 1864, and General Lee in Richmond would have been quite happy to destroy Washington DC through the agency of his Confederate General Jubal Early. Early slipped back from Richmond to Washington after General Grant had withdrawn most of his troops to fight in Virginia. He was stopped for a day by the Battle of Monocacy 45 miles away from Washington—in which my own great, great-grandfather fought– which was just enough time for General Grant to rush back his troops and defeat those of General Early, who did enter Washington.
And now I’ll step back to cover.
Native Atlantan
August 1st, 2012
9:32 pm
On the wall over the urinal is probably too good for Sherman but I think it is rather humorous! Bet the picture was “blemished”.
Harold
August 1st, 2012
10:19 pm
It was probably some LSU fan
Firebrand
August 1st, 2012
10:20 pm
Sherman’s hordes raped and pillaged whites and blacks alike on their terror trek across the south. He is in hell right next to Hitler and Pol Pot. And, just as a note of accuracy and not hyperbole, killing and maiming slaves would have been the dumbest thing for slaveowners to do, since slaves were very expensive investments. Doing so would have been akin to buying a tractor and then breaking the wheels off of it!
Firebrand
August 1st, 2012
10:25 pm
And again, as a note of historical accuracy, while Nathan Bedford Forrest was one of the originators of the KKK, it was not intended as a hate group initially, but more of a police group as law enforcement was spread very thin in the south after the war. When it began to evolve into a hate group, Forrest tried his best to kill it off, but it was too far gone. He was actually considered one of the champions of racial harmony in the post war south, especially in Tennessee. See his speech to one of the earliest black rights groups in 1875: http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/092007/09092007/310000
aladawg
August 2nd, 2012
12:17 am
Hell, the north did not win the war because it is said that to the victors go the spoils. If the north had won then why didn’t they take the spoils (slaves) north with them. The whole United States would be a lot better off if the north had implemented Lincoln’s plan to ship all the slaves to an Island and turn them loose. There would have been no need for welfare, food stamps or all the other social programs that is in place today for the decendents of slaves. Also, more than 85% of murders, rapes, thefts and drug dealers would not be happening today.
Will Jones - Atlanta Jeffersonian Exegesis
August 2nd, 2012
12:20 am
Americans must again learn to think and believe as did our White and Black whig Founders. Their utopian Whiggism – the diametrically anti-Fascist individual sovereignty of American Exceptionalism – is enshrined in the rarely understood three mottoes of our credal civil religion for which the Creator once prospered and protected us: Novus Ordo Seclorum; E Pluibus Unum; and, Annuit Coeptis.
Rome was “the Wall Street of slavery” for over 2,000 years. When during Mr. Jefferson’s administration the importation of slaves became illegal (had his Declaration’s First Draft been left unedited slavery would have ended immediately), from Rome’s “Big Slavery,” and Roman Catholic immigrants who got “off the boat” in the South went inland and stopped being papists, never to send back for priests (as can be easily confirmed by googling “1855 Roman Catholic Church census” – Margaret Mitchell was Roman Catholic and a propagandist for Rome by fabricating the Roman Catholic “O’Haras”), Rome knew they had a big “problem” in America. Their faithful DuPonts were sent here to help “solve” the problem in the way Caesar always wins: through “divide and conquer,” selling shot and shell from their Delaware factories to both the North and South.
Sherman was a Roman Catholic leading Roman Catholic troops. Craven, vested WASPs like Rockefeller and Carnegie, bought their way out of the draft for $300.
After Rome’s Fifth Column’s victory they nailed the symbol of the power and authority of Rome, the antithesis of Whiggism, to the front wall of the U.S. House: the Fasces.
This is why we now live in a “de facto” fascist state with only the Roman Catholics on the Supreme Court illegally violating settled law to cheat a homosexual psychopath into the White House to commit 9/11. The CIA and FBI are both Roman Catholic-run, as is Congress, controlled by Rome’s plurality. GHW Bush, and his Hitler-financing father’s protege, Nixon, oversaw the Knight of Malta-led CIA’s proven assassination of President Kennedy (E. Howard Hunt’s deathbed confession confirms the jury’s judgment in ‘Hunt v. Marchetti’) six weeks after his NSAM263 had ended our role as papal catspaw in Vietnam on the side of the five percent Roman Catholic colonial elite which owned 95% of the wealth whose leader openly bragged on the BBC that Hitler (a molested Roman Catholic altarboy) was his “hero,” and to “reverse” JFK’s EO11,110, which had ended Rome’s bankers’ illegal money frachise, known as the “Federal Reserve Bank.”
During JFK’s term we used constitutional money, U.S. Notes, not Fed. Res. Notes, by which Americans are now, through debasement, being rendered insolvent, and the false elite manipulators have off-shored $30 trillion to destroy any threat from the People, as well as staging such events as 9/11 and the Aurora Shooting to take away our rights, money, and Second Amendment.
“They” know what “they” are doing, as do the Roman “sharks’” Talmudic “suckerfish” who have been profiting with their Roman masters for thousands of years and now believe they have “magically” turned we reviled “goyim” into their “golem” shedding innocent blood in the Middle East on behalf of the State of Israel.. It’s ironic, to say the least, that the prophecies of Isaiah concerning the New Israel apply only to Gentile-founded America, “into which all nations of the world flow,” not to the racist tribalism which is the State of Israel.
The Bushes have been fronting the Vatican banker Rockefellers (who oversee the largest cash-flow in history, the RCC collection plate funds from which they financed the rise of Nazism through Knight of Malta Prescott Bush) since they together built what is now Roman Catholic “Big Oil” on unredressed murder and arson in 1870’s Cleveland. It is no coincidence the oil we’ve now stolen in Iraq, and look to in Iran, has essentially “disappeared” as gas prices continue to rise.
Truth and Justice is of G-d, as must be Our Holy and Righteous Nation.
Smithian Capitalism requires the maintenance of Truth and Justice in society.
Sherman was, like Hitler, just a product of priestly molestation.
Rome’s Hitler-financing, JFK-assassinating, 9/11-committing Rockefeller-Bush Roman Catholic CIA/FBI Fed Fifth Column fascist plutocracy must be fully expropriated and judicially disposed, along with all the Roman Church’s property, the largest in the U.S. other than the Federal Government’s, acquired after their agents precipitated The Crash of ‘29.
Thomas Jefferson was Our Founder and Author, but he was also a Prophet of G-d and correctly knew Rome and its Babylonian pedophile priesthood to be “the real Anti-Christ,” “an engine for enslaving mankind.” Sherman was just another of Satan’s victims, but Atlanta, Georgia, and America must now be free of Satan, just as the urinal in Marietta is free of Sherman’s satanic visage.
G-d is not mocked: Death for Treason
Will Jones - Atlanta Jeffersonian Exegesis
August 2nd, 2012
12:46 am
For the truth of Sherman and what he’s done to America: https://www.facebook.com/will.jones.1213/posts/165052590297106
chris
August 2nd, 2012
1:56 am
I can’t believe we are still fighting over this. All the items of the confererate war are artifacts of a terrible time in history, we should use it as a way to teach what not to do. Both sides were awful, but slavery should have never happened. There was black slavery and white slavery. Slavery was the point and we should be ashamed that it happened and we even had to have a war to stop it. The Flag of Dixie is a symbol of that time. It is an artifact but not the flag of America anymore. No picture or book, or flag should be stolen. Shame on all the hateful comments. We just keep it going and keep it going. If you are not a person of wealth and privilege, you will be a prisoner of slavery in the near future. One mistake, one comment to the wrong person, one mistep, and in jail working for the CEO’s of corporations, just like China. Stop fighting each other and come together for the good of this country that so many lives have been lost for. Did they all die in vain? Sounds like they did. From the Civil War, to WWI, to WWII, Korea, Vietnam, Desert Storm, and Iraq and Afghanistan. All your loved one died for nothing. Just keep it up. Shame on all of the haters.
chris
August 2nd, 2012
2:00 am
Firebrand, would you like it if your children were sold to another farmer, and you would never see them again. They may have not always beat them, but they did beat them. And if they didn’t work the next day, they would beat them again. Where the hell were they going to go.? They beat their horses into submission. They beat their slaves into submission. You need to read up on what really happened. You are living in disney world.
chris
August 2nd, 2012
2:03 am
Firebrand, As far as the rape and pillage, that comes with war. War is evil. There is nothing about war that is good. Even some of our soldiers have comitted rape on the people of the land, their own women soldiers. War is not a football game. So stop the wars. Enough is enough. We never learn.
chris
August 2nd, 2012
2:15 am
Prof knows his history, and horsetoothjackass, did you name yourself that or did someone else give you that name. It is fitting. No one can let the sleeping dog ly. Stop being hateful. We all need to stop, while we fight, they keep taking the game on us further and further.
BONNIE MCDANIEL
August 2nd, 2012
2:20 am
HAVING A PICTURE OF THIS ARSONIST STOLEN IS OF NO GREAT LOSS TO ANYONE. I AM SURE HE IS IN HELL STOKING THE FIRES HE ENJOYED PLAYING WITH SO MUCH ON EARTH.
falcon60
August 2nd, 2012
5:47 am
Thanks quint……….idiot as well as northern “hater”. Why don’t you get over it?
The Real Historian
August 2nd, 2012
6:42 am
This is whay as a Southerner I am still amazed at the lack ok historical knowledge. Sherman did NOT burn Atlanta dowm. The Confederates wanted to leave nothing that could be used by Sherman when he reached Atlanta. The fire was spread by Atlantans after that.
Please get it right, my people.
wreck
August 2nd, 2012
7:11 am
F Sherman
Glad you guys remember
August 2nd, 2012
7:29 am
If you forget history you are doomed to repeat it. Well, it’s good to see that see many southerners still remember. They are less likely to repeat the ignorant decision that led to the War of Southern Stupidity in the first place. Sherman’s actions were warranted by the actions of conceited, puffed-up southern blowhards that needed to learn the message of humility. Lincoln, Sherman, Grant and others defended our precious Constitution and, in doing so, helped end slavery much sooner than the south would have allowed.
Seriously?
August 2nd, 2012
7:38 am
Are we talking about Sherman in 2012? Who cares? He was a clown.
Firebrand
August 2nd, 2012
8:42 am
Chris, respectfully, read the slave narratives for a clear view of the entire spectrum of the slave experience in America. Just like the idiots who beat women and children today, yes, there were slave beaters. But there were many examples of slaves being treated quite well. I am not defending the institution – there is no defending it. But, just as our descendants hopefully won’t judge us too harshly for our social ills like abortion or illegitimate births or many others, it is too easy to judge 18th century mores through a set of eyes 200 years removed. All hands were dirty in the slave trade – white and black.
Will Jones - Atlanta Jeffersonian Exegesis
August 2nd, 2012
8:56 am
Slavery had existed since the Dawn of Time, and yet survives in some forms and areas today, but ended in Our Nation within a generation of the passing of America’s Black and White utopian whig Founders. Only five percent of Southerners owned slaves and it wasn’t until 1815 that Virginia’s legislature made it illegal for a Black to own a White slave. Manufacturers of Eli Whitney’s cotton gins, the Ellisons of Augusta, a Black family, owned hundreds of slaves.
The focus must be on the usurpation of America by the force Roman Catholic Sherman represented: the Roman Anti-Christ Thomas Jefferson identified: “an engine for enslaving mankind,” whose Rockefeller-Bush Roman Catholic CIA/FBI Fed Fifth Column we know committed 9/11 abetted by the Talmudists of Mossad and the Zionist PNAC, and, until they are brought to justice, expropriated and removed from Our Land, we cannot know they did not also stage the Aurora Massacre.
Until then Sherman is alive and well, and flushing the American Dream down the urinal.
Prof
August 2nd, 2012
11:23 am
@ Firebrand, August 2nd, 8:42 am: “Chris, respectfully, read the slave narratives for a clear view of the entire spectrum of the slave experience in America. Just like the idiots who beat women and children today, yes, there were slave beaters. But there were many examples of slaves being treated quite well.”
Those American slave narratives should be read with an enormous helping of salt. It was illegal for slaves to be literate or to teach them to read and write, so with the obvious exception of the one by Frederick Douglass, most narratives were dictated to white abolitionists. We don’t really know how much was the slave’s actual narrative and how much was added by the white abolitionist, or how much was suppressed by the slave to this white person writing down the words. The slave’s distrust of white people ran pretty deep, even Northern white people.
The American mid-19th century was a prudish time. Did the abolitionist taking down the narrative keep back some of the more terrible graphic details of the floggings and punishments for any sign of resistance that we know now from other records was a day-to-day part of chattel slavery? Or censor the actual slave rapes and the sexual slavery that we know now was part of Southern slavery? Did the abolitionist add anything to the slave’s narrative, such as religious conversions and pieties?
In addition to the slave narratives, go back to the letters and journals of the slave-owners and their wives (who often had to endure seeing the slave-children who looked like her husband). for a picture of Southern slavery. Study also what happened to those slaves who dared to run away to the North….and think how bad it must have gotten for them to flee.
Peachstealth
August 2nd, 2012
11:26 am
My great-great grandfather was a newspaper man in South Georgia and an eye witness to Sherman’s march. He wrote” Sherman says ‘war is hell’ well, he ought to know, he’s the Devil”
Prof
August 2nd, 2012
11:45 am
@ Firebrand, August 1st, 10:20 pm: “…just as a note of accuracy and not hyperbole, killing and maiming slaves would have been the dumbest thing for slaveowners to do, since slaves were very expensive investments.”
Perhaps, but the slave-owners had the very real problem of slave runaways to the North. Why else do you think they persuaded the federal government to pass the Fugitive Slave Act in 1850 that prohibited Northerners from assisting slave fugitives? Also, slave-owners greatly feared bloody slave revolts, for many took place in Southern states following the supreme slave revolt of the Haitian Revolution from 1791-1803.
You’re going to kill and maim those who you think might kill and maim you, or whose fleeing might be an example for your other slaves. Maybe it’s “the dumbest thing” to do with a business investment, but these “pieces of chattel” were getting increasingly desperate.
Will Jones - Atlanta Jeffersonian Exegesis
August 2nd, 2012
12:20 pm
Many freed Blacks took the name “Jones” to honor Colquitt Jones of Liberty County, because he risked his life to teach Blacks to read so G-d, through Its Word, might be received by each direct, as is every Americans right, free of the “de facto” fascism which has now usurped the Constitution and the People, thanks to Satan’s minion, Wm T. Sherman, et al.
basspro2150
August 2nd, 2012
12:21 pm
Should have been hung over the sh#$#@!@#$er
bumms green
August 2nd, 2012
6:58 pm
uncle billy was just gettng revenge for lee invadng pa, atlanta was burning before he got there,citizens of atlanta set the fire their self.grow up and get over it. also i hope you are not a natonal park
BIGRED
August 2nd, 2012
7:08 pm
Enter your comments here
BIGRED
August 2nd, 2012
7:12 pm
Dang… My iPhone just plum got away from me, and sent that blank message. I guess you can say, I was shootin blanks. Anyway, I heard from my Uncle Zeek that Sherman even invented “water boarding”!
ernest green
August 2nd, 2012
8:36 pm
To both of the doe heads, the ones at the museum and the theif. t just goes to prove that after all these years the average georgian is just as dumb as their for fathers were when Sherman whipped them in 1864! lets put lee over the toilet next, where he belongs!