We’ve got a copy of the new Senate rules about to be approved by the chamber. Click here for your copy, or browse through it here:
From a quick reading:
The same rules that put a $100 cap on gifts from lobbyists to lawmakers include a large loophole for travel, and also shrinks the list of those who may file complaints alleging violations to the Senate Ethics Committee – dropping “volunteers” from the list.
Complaints may only be brought by “a Senator or Senate staff, aides, or interns.” I.e., those who receive a paycheck from the chamber.
You’ll recall that the recent complaint against Senate Rules Chairman Don Balfour was originally filed with the state ethics commission by a junior majoring in political science at Georgia Gwinnett College, who compared Balfour’s mileage claims and found lobbyists reported buying Balfour meals on the same dates in August in New Orleans and San Antonio.
The state ethics commission referred the complaint to Senate Ethics Committee – which rewrote the complaint and re-filed it as a complaint brought by the entire committee. The private citizen was removed as a party to the action. So the ban on complaints generated by private citizens remains unchanged.
The new rules also increase restrictions intended to keep such complaints from public disclosure.
Here are the exceptions to the $100 gift cap contained in the rules:
– Awards, plaques, mementos “in recognition of the recipient’s civic, charitable, political, professional, or public service;
– “Food, beverages, or event registration or admission made available to all members of the General Assembly, the Senate, or any caucus, committee, or subcommittee of such bodies.” Call it the “Wild Hog clause.”
– Expenses for “admission, registration, food, beverages, travel, and lodging attributed to participating in events, seminars, or educational programs sponsored by or in conjunction with a civic, charitable, governmental, educational, professional, community, or business organization or institution where attendance is related to the Senator’s official duties.” So junkets – er, informational searches – would still be allowed.
– “Promotional items generally distributed to the general public or to public officers”;
– “Unsolicited items temporarily loaned to the Senator for the purpose of testing, evaluation, or review, if the Senator has no personal beneficial interest in the eventual acquisition of the item loaned;”
– “Informational material, publications, memberships, or subscriptions related to the Senator’s staff, aides performance of his or her official duties.” Free magazine subscriptions for everybody.
According to these same rules, Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle would wield the balance of power in the Senate via a newly constituted committee on assignments composed of the lieutenant governor, the Senate president pro tem, the majority leader, and two senators designated by the lieutenant governor.
Other items worth noting:
– Tthe new rules appear to limit the ability of the lieutenant governor to pick and choose who can wield the gavel over the chamber in his stead. The new rules state that he can only give that duty to the president pro tem.
– The rules also establish a new committee and, thus, a new chairmanship: The Senate Judiciary, Non-Civil, Committee.
– Points of personal priviledge – those short speeches made by senators on topics of their own choice – have been moved back to the top of the daily calendar. The previous Senate administration had positioned them at the bottom, amid grumbling that the move was intended to stifle dissent.
– Maybe it’s new, and maybe it isn’t, but rules for media in the Senate now include this:
Photographers and television camerapersons may NOT film or record the desk or any document or object on the desk of a Senator, unless permission is granted by the member.
Those senators who play solitaire on their laptops now have protection.
- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider
For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.
60 comments Add your comment
Brian Hunt
January 14th, 2013
1:10 pm
The new ethics rule would be acceptable if it didn’t make it possible for them to hide ethics complaints from the public. Something about that just doesn’t pass the smell test.
Bob Loblaw
January 14th, 2013
1:11 pm
@Porkchop:
You wrote: “Yet what you’re arguing is not what’s at issue.”
It is exactly what is at issue…this story talks about citizens somehow losing the ability to file a complaint against a Member. There is no ability lost. The complaint can still be filed if it violates anything in the Act.
The Producer
January 14th, 2013
1:28 pm
BOO YA.THAT’S RIGHT BUBBA GUMP BOYS AND GIRLS, IN YOUR FACE. WHAT IN THE HELL DID THE CITIZENS OF GEORGIA EXPECT. STUPID IS AS STUPID DOES!!!!
Porkchopicus of Borg
January 14th, 2013
1:41 pm
Bob Loblaw — “It is exactly what is at issue…”
Absolutely not. Please reread. You clearly said:
“You don’t have a right to walk into a Senate Committee and file a complaint that is afforded due process.”
Nobody is arguing for the citizenry to be able to do that IN THAT WAY. Yet in defending what the Senate’s doing, you and the Senate are throwing the baby out with the bathwater. A citizen could easily file a complaint with a state office — well, if Governor Deal hadn’t cut its nuts off — and never see the Senate Committee itself.
You need to distinguish between the orderly filing of an ethics complaint and storming into a Committee’s meeting room and pooping in the punchbowl. There’s a big difference between the two.
“this story talks about citizens somehow losing the ability to file a complaint against a Member.”
And what you specifically complained about was citizens *walking into a Senate committee to file that complaint,” Fine. We can prevent that, while still preserving the ability of citizens to *file* complaints.
“There is no ability lost. The complaint can still be filed if it violates anything in the Act.”
Did you not read what Mr. Galloway posted?
Complaints may only be brought by “a Senator or Senate staff, aides, or interns.” I.e., those who receive a paycheck from the chamber.
It seems quite clear that the ability *is* lost and that there’s no provision for the public to file any sort of complaint at all. Excepting, of course, your notion of filing suit as being somehow equivalent to a complaint.
Stillaskeptic
January 14th, 2013
1:53 pm
Someone, please tell me what ideal ethics reform would look like. Seriously. I’d love to hear what you have to say.
Debbie
January 14th, 2013
3:19 pm
@Bob Loblaw, I think Minnie Mouse could actually do a better job than some that are in there now.
Debbie
January 14th, 2013
3:25 pm
People like Bob Loblaw think you should just trust elected officials if they are Republican and just ignore $17,000 trips they take to Europe at Thanksgiving. People like Bob Loblaw want things to go back to the way they were when legislators did not have so many people looking over their shoulders and that we just trusted that because they were Republicans they were doing the right thing.
Dave
January 14th, 2013
6:53 pm
I’ll bet these people are just so proud of themselves for such hard hitting ethics reform. I can’t decide if they are so arrogant that they think people won’t realize that this is meaningless or they just don’t care what the people they say they represent think.
A hundred bucks a day from each lobbyist for each “gift?” Them’s some perks. You lobbyists are going to have to up your games. I can just see the Bones “lobbyist special” on a nice $99 bottle of wine to send to the table across the room while getting a nod from your colleague who is spending $99 on the vittles, each and every day for as long as they want.
Dave
January 14th, 2013
7:06 pm
And I forgot to bitch about only the Senate being able to complain about its laughable rules, even then no one will know unless the Senate decides a Senator broke the laughable rules. When do you think that will happen? Pigs fly don’t they?
As The State Turns: Senate Now Debates Its Rules
January 15th, 2013
8:17 am
[...] can read the rules in it’s entirety here, but Jim Galloway has a pretty good run down of the proposed rules of the Georgia Senate. A key note of interest concerning the $100 gift limit: The same rules that [...]