John Boehner retains speakership; Paul Broun goes West

John Boehner was re-elected House speaker this afternoon, as reports of a coup turned out to be wildly overstated — though several Republicans did publicly signal their disapproval.

One of them was U.S. Rep. Paul Broun of Athens. Broun voted for former Rep. Allen West for speaker – even though the Florida firebrand served just one term in Congress and lost a re-election bid in November.

Georgia’s Republican House members all lined up against Boehner on the fiscal cliff deal Tuesday night, but all except Broun backed him Thursday – including newcomer Doug Collins from Gainesville.

Broun explained himself this way:

“After careful consideration, I opted to cast my vote for a new Speaker of the House. Speaker Boehner is a good man and a good friend, but under his leadership, this Congress has failed to address the root of our nation’s fiscal crisis — the out-of-control spending in Washington. My hope was that we could elect a new speaker, so the 113th Congress would be forced to get serious about cutting spending and restoring prosperity to the American economy and people.”

Consider this to be more evidence that the Athens congressman is seriously considering a 2014 challenge to U.S. Sen. Saxby Chambliss.

A total of 12 Republicans voted against Boehner, with choices that included retired Gen. Colin Powell – one does not have to be a member of Congress to be speaker – and Majority Leader Eric Cantor (who himself voted for Boehner). Texas Rep. Louie Gohmert joined Broun in voting for West, who is originally from Atlanta. Gohmert has a noted fondness for ex-Georgians: During the closed-door speaker vote in November, Gohmert nominated Newt Gingrich.

On the Democratic side a few Blue Dog members chose not to back Nancy Pelosi, including Rep. John Barrow of Augusta. He voted – for the second Congress in a row – for Rep. John Lewis of Atlanta. (Lewis, whose wife died Monday, was not present.)

Here’s what Barrow told me in October about his speakership vote:

“I have had a parting of the ways with former Speaker Pelosi, Leader Pelosi, over the way she guided the caucus in the [111th] Congress,” Barrow said. “I voted against her twice, first in a secret ballot in caucus and second in a public vote on the floor of the House casting a vote against her for Speaker. That is not going to change.”

- By Daniel Malloy, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

59 comments Add your comment

Retired Soldier

January 3rd, 2013
5:32 pm

That would be true TD.

Grego

January 3rd, 2013
5:34 pm

Mr. td,
Yes, this is actually an issue that a minority get to elect guys like this.
No offense, I did not have a conversation with him and I o not question his IQ.
But his judgement is a different story…

Richard Braswell

January 3rd, 2013
5:36 pm

Retired Soldier….1st Team!!!! However, It is easy to bash Cheney and his relationship w/ Hailiburton but don’t forget two facts (non facts). Haliburton via Brown and Root and (Knutson) were smart enough( in league with congress) to forsee military needs (and rape the American taxpayer on a fools mission) and developed (create huge campaign contributors on the tax payers dime) those capabilities. Any other company could have done the same. Like Pacific Architects and Engineers…PA&E in Viet Nam. A subsidiary of a Texas company, a communications company, owned by woman, a Johnson. P A & E…B K &R….same same…

Retired Soldier

January 3rd, 2013
5:42 pm

Richard-

not familar w/ PA&E, post Vietnam here. Again there is more to the story. The need for those capabilities was due to Bush the Elder and Clinton reducing the military(post cold war bonus) and they particularly down sized logistics and made the decision to out source logistics.

If they were paid to much it’s the companies fault? No, it’s the governments fault for paying those huge prices. Personally as far as the military goes, keep it all green suiters and I like it much better.

Monorail cat

January 3rd, 2013
5:55 pm

@ td

” This 20% is what is Constitutionally mandated to spend.”

There is no constitutional mandate for defense spending. You’ve probaly defense is part of the discretionary budget. That means optional.

You should also be aware that the men who wrote the constituion hated standing armies and consistenly argued they were tyrannical and wasteful.

Monorail cat

January 3rd, 2013
6:02 pm

@ retired soldier

” Not interested in fighting over the size of the military budget,”

If you want to reduce the debt, but you’re not interesed in the size of the government’s third largest expense, then you’re not really interested in reducing the debt.

Richard Braswell

January 3rd, 2013
6:32 pm

Great New Year To All… and to the idiots here, I hope better for you.

Starik

January 4th, 2013
12:26 am

I, too remember PA&E – and Brown and Root, which I believe was folded into Halliburton. Lots of people make lots of money off these stupid wars, and it is not the soldiers.

By the way, the CIB is the Combat Infantry Badge, and I was drafted and did a tour in Viet-Nam I’m happy to say I wasn;t assigned to that particular job.

honested

January 4th, 2013
8:00 am

retired,

To last evening, yes I have met Congressman broun and spoke with him on a few occasions. I have sat in his macabre office attempting to have an intelligent conversation with him on matters of public interest.

That is why I can support the publicly announced decisions calling him the ‘Dimmest Bulb in Congress’.