Hot off the presses from the main site, figure it’s worth posting here too. It’s been a wild night in the Capitol:
By Daniel Malloy
WASHINGTON —
House Speaker John Boehner’s “fiscal cliff” backup plan fell apart Thursday night, and the U.S. House adjourned for Christmas, as his restive Republican caucus balked at a bill that would let taxes rise on income over $1 million.
Boehner intended to use the measure to pressure Democrats, who opposed it, to come up with a better deal. But in the end his forceful, personal appeals for the bill were not enough to bring 217 votes for passage.
Boehner has been personally negotiating with President Barack Obama on a larger deal to raise taxes, cut spending and reform entitlement programs — but he pursued the Republican-only “Plan B” as a fallback.
The gambit failed.
Now the House is not set to return before Dec. 27, and Boehner in a statement said the onus is on Obama to work with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid on a plan to avoid the tax hikes and spending cuts scheduled for the new year.
Obama and Boehner have been engaged in one-on-one negotiations but remain apart on the parameters of a so-called grand bargain — the politics of which are complicated further by Boehner’s inability to muster the votes for his tax measure.
“The President’s main priority is to ensure that taxes don’t go up on 98 percent of Americans and 97 percent of small businesses in just a few short days,” White House spokesman Jay Carney said after the House adjourned. “The President will work with Congress to get this done, and we are hopeful that we will be able to find a bipartisan solution quickly that protects the middle class and our economy.”
Boehner’s “Plan B” bill was designed as a fallback against the expiration of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, to ensure that marginal tax rates — as well as the estate tax and alternative minimum tax — would remain unchanged for the vast majority of taxpayers. But the White House and the Democrat-controlled Senate vowed to block the bill, saying it did not raise enough revenue and did not do enough for the middle class. (The Senate passed a bill in the fall to extend marginal tax rates for incomes of $250,000 or less.)
Raising taxes at all goes sharply against Republican orthodoxy, and Boehner canceled the night’s scheduled vote once he realized more than two dozen of his members would refuse to allow any rates to rise.
Two conservative Georgians who announced their opposition in advance were U.S. Reps. Lynn Westmoreland of Coweta County and Paul Broun of Athens. Thursday afternoon, Broun declared, “I’m not raising taxes on anybody,” and insisted that a cuts-only approach is the only way to tame the nation’s deficits.
Other members of the delegation said the vote was the best of a bad situation. Still more played their cards close to the vest. U.S. Rep. Tom Price of Roswell declared himself undecided two hours before the scheduled vote time.
U.S. Rep. Jack Kingston, a Savannah Republican, said Boehner told the caucus at a hastily called meeting Thursday night: “Right now we’re at an impasse, and we’re going to go home.”
“Every now and then you just have to regroup, and I’ve seen lots of tough votes before,” Kingston added as he left the meeting. “It’s a birthing process, if you will, with lots of labor pains, so that’s where we are.”
U.S. Rep. Rob Woodall, a Lawrenceville Republican, had been speaking in favor of the bill on the House floor. After the collapse he said of Boehner: “He has unilaterally pushed this conference as far as he can and now he’s got to have some teamwork from the other side.”
Any final deal likely will require House Democratic votes, but they did not offer any support for Boehner’s Plan B.
Rep. David Scott, an Atlanta Democrat, called the bill a “desperate move” by Boehner and said he opposed it because it did not raise enough tax revenue and, by allowing payroll taxes to rise, constituted a middle-class tax hike.
“It not only pushes us away from a deal, it raises anxiety among the American people,” Scott said.
Boehner — who had proclaimed earlier in the day he would have the votes — issued a terse statement after the conference meeting, noting the House over the summer passed a bill to extend all tax rates and twice, including Thursday night, voted for a bill to replace the across-the-board spending cuts with targeted slices to domestic programs such as food stamps and children’s health insurance. Democrats have dismissed both plans.
“The Senate must now act,” Boehner said.
Boehner took the rare step of personally whipping colleagues on the floor. On Wednesday evening, he sat behind Broun, Kingston and Phil Gingrey of Marietta and aggressively tried to cajole them into voting for the deal.
He appeared to have won over Gingrey by Thursday afternoon, when Gingrey said he was leaning toward voting yes.
“I’m not voting for a tax increase,” Gingrey said. “That’s current law. That’s going to happen anyway, and if we don’t do anything taxes are going up on everybody.”
Whether or not the vote was a tax hike was in dispute. Americans for Tax Reform — run by high-profile activist Grover Norquist — gave its approval to the bill as a non-tax increase. By contrast, the influential conservative groups FreedomWorks, Club For Growth and Heritage Action for America urged members to vote against it.
63 comments Add your comment
td
December 21st, 2012
10:24 am
Fact: Republicans pledged to their constituents that they will not raise taxes.
Fact: Republicans control the House of Representatives and will do so for the next 10 years.
Fact: If the voters wanted Obama to total control then they would have put Democrats back in charge of the House of Reps in Nov, when the facts show show them splitting their votes for Obama for President and a Republican in the House.
The House belongs to the people and the people have decided not to give the power of the purse and the President to the same party. Obama is going to have to give in the same as Clinton and Regan did when they had a different party in charge of the House.
You Progressives need to get use to those facts and figure out a way to raise revenues without raising taxes.
td
December 21st, 2012
10:30 am
JD
December 21st, 2012
9:48 am
Slice it up however you want TD. Obama won and had a majority of the popular vote. Nobody cares that Paul Ryan won reelection in a majority republican congressional district.
You would have a legitimate argument if we lived in a parliamentary style government but we do not so your argument is mute. Your argument may also have some validity if you could explain why the American people in more the 30 congressional districts in this country voted for Obama and at the same time voted to put their republican back in the House of Reps.
Village Idiot
December 21st, 2012
10:44 am
Here’s the question that the Republican dominated House must answer. How can we not raise taxes on anyone by refusing to come up with a plan which replaces the plan we’ve already come up with which raises taxes on everyone?
What a bunch of idiots! The Republican party has never looked as irrelevant as it does right now! Mitch McConnell asking for a vote on a bill the other day and then filibustering the bill he had just called for a vote on! These morons can’t even get out of their own way! Go ahead and go home for Christmas! Just do us a favor and don’t go back to Washington!
td
December 21st, 2012
10:57 am
Village Idiot
December 21st, 2012
10:44 am
That may be a relevant argument if there was not a House bill already sent to the Senate in August that would raise taxes on no one. So the real question is why do the Democrats want to raise taxes on everyone?
Eli
December 21st, 2012
11:01 am
Timbo makes an excellent specimen here. First, as far as the budget goes, welfare is such a small portion of the total budget that it is almost a rounding error. Second, foodstamp programs and medicaid are not about feeding and clothing the poor. These programs are predominantly for the children of the poor. Thirdly, the people that receive these forms of government aid contribute billions to the economy…by spending their vouchers on goods produced by the private sector (e.g. goods produced by agribusiness and sold by grocers).
Aside from racializing welfare, not understanding how it works, and overestimating the total cost of such programs, Timbo underscores another conservative problem when the budget and deficit reduction policies are discussed. She, and the right-wing, is not interested in dealing with the problem. Just like banning earmarks! These people pretend it is a deficit problem…and ban a popular policy tool to save a measly $18billion (again, a rounding error).
Your Daily Jolt: Boehner: 'they weren't taking that out on me' | Political Insider
December 21st, 2012
11:08 am
[...] few minutes ago, House Speaker John Boehner faced the press following last night’s Plan B Implosion and declared that he does not think that the conservative rebellion was about him, and he does not [...]
Village Idiot
December 21st, 2012
11:08 am
@td . . . So the real question is why do the Democrats want to raise taxes on everyone?
Answer: They don’t! If I heard the president correctly, he has suggested that those people making more than $250,000.00 a year pay a slightly higher income tax rate. Believe me! That is not everyone!
nathan's political arsonist
December 21st, 2012
11:20 am
watching the gop slowly die is more fun than listening to noot ginrich tell the world how smart he is
td
December 21st, 2012
11:21 am
Village Idiot
December 21st, 2012
11:08 am
@td . . . So the real question is why do the Democrats want to raise taxes on everyone?
Answer: They don’t! If I heard the president correctly, he has suggested that those people making more than $250,000.00 a year pay a slightly higher income tax rate. Believe me! That is not everyone!
Then why does the President insist that the Republicans break a written promise they made to the voters that put them into office?
BTW: The President also promised the American people that he would balance the budget in the first 4 years in office. Where is that plan? Do you really think it can be done by raising $80 billion per year in taxes? What other cuts has he placed on the table? Where is the Presidents plan? Have you seen a written version of it?
Village Idiot
December 21st, 2012
11:43 am
Then why does the President insist that the Republicans break a written promise they made to the voters that put them into office?
The same reason that Republicans want him to deprive the elderly of their Social Security benefits and Medicaid. The same reason that Republicans want him to cut food stamps and extended unemployment benefits for the workers who lost their jobs after Wall Street’s thieves tried to destroy the global economy then took interest free loans to remain in business while refusing to cut upper management’s salaries. The list goes on and on, but the two sides must compromise. That is the art of governing. If the House refuses to cooperate, they will be held responsible by the American voters when spending cuts AND tax increases go into effect in just 11 days. Nobody told the Republican party to sell its soul to Grover Norquist. He was never elected to any office. Republican candidates signed his pledge in order to get his endorsement and money for their campaigns. That’s the problem with the GOP, in my opinion; they see green when the rest of us see red, white, and blue.
DJ Sniper
December 21st, 2012
12:16 pm
It’s quite comical to watch the GOP implode on itself. You would think that this last election would be a wake up call, yet they continue to go down the same road that’s leading them on the path to irrevelance.
It’s also funny to see TD continue his mantra of how the GOP held on to the house without mentioning gerrymandering. After all his poll predictions didn’t come true, I guess he has to try to save face somewhere.
haha_GOP
December 21st, 2012
1:06 pm
So far all I have learned in the comments is that ‘td’ lives in two different districts…. about the gerrymandering thing…. lol
yuzeyurbrane
December 21st, 2012
2:27 pm
jd–Ryan actually lost his hometown, a place where they should know him best.