Don’t blame Bain Capital for WGST’s collapse

If you are of a certain age and tuned to WGST this morning, only to hear an ESPN announcer talk about sports – in Spanish, a small part of you died.

In the 1980s and for several years beyond, WGST was one of the most influential news outlets in Atlanta, with a large staff of reporters that included Denis O’Hayer (now with WABE), Bill Edge (now a spokesman for the state Public Service Commission) and Tammy Lloyd.

Where have you gone, Tammy?

Me? In the ‘60s and ‘70s, before I left for UGA, my college football team was Georgia Tech. Which meant Saturdays with Al Ciraldo and WGST. (Musically, the station was less than revolutionary — in an age of rock, “The Lettermen” was a programming favorite.)

Many of you talk-radio enthusiasts have posited that WGST’s collapse is a result of machinations by Clear Channel owner Bain Capital and – by inference – the GOP presidential nominee.

Not so, explains Eric Seidel.

In a note making the rounds in Atlanta and elsewhere, the former WGST station manager explains what happened:

I’ve been getting questions about the latest iteration of WGST. If you’re not in Atlanta, WGST is a station owned and operated by Clear Channel.

It’s primarily an AM station (it does have a weak FM simulcast), although it was, at one time, a very competitive AM/FM combination. That specific FM simulcast was removed in 1999, or so.

I was station manager there for 10½ years, leaving to start my own business in 1997.

Its format was converted last week from newstalk to ESPN’s Spanish language, all-sports network.

[I]f you are not familiar with WGST, in the late 80s and much of the 90s, it was a thriving newstalk station with a significant amount of influence in the metro Atlanta market. Playing to the realities of the market, WGST targeted the large conservative-listening audience, running the Rush Limbaugh syndicated show. And it was Sean Hannity’s second radio job—strictly as a locally-originated host—before he went national, first with Fox News Channel and his own syndicated radio show, based in NYC.

I’ve seen some statements on Facebook bemoaning the fact that Clear Channel is now owned by Bain Capital, and that’s the reason for WGST’s demise.

Wrong! Bain is the private owner of Clear Channel. But WGST’s demise started years ago, before even Clear Channel bought the station. The owner before CC was Jacor Communications, based in Cincinnati. For me, working with and for Jacor was a great experience.

But Jacor was one of the original consolidators when Federal law changed and radio groups could harvest huge numbers of radio stations. Once that happened, the [publicly held] broadcasting companies became much larger, and much more beholden to Wall Street. Bean counters took on greater importance and programming, especially at the local level, was reduced in importance in direct proportion to the importance of finance departments.

Certainly, before consolidation, we believed in making a profit, but creative, intelligent risk-taking programming was behind the wheel of our bus. Jacor encouraged its programmers being on the edge and leading the way for the industry. We were constantly told that programming would lead the way and, done well, sales would follow. It was an unusual, unique attitude, but it worked.

The ebb and flow of the economy forced us to make cuts as necessary over the years, of course, but the programming always was paramount and protected.

And then came the Internet and all the various technological strides that were swept in with it. Syndication took wing. With music formats radio groups could have one announcer do the voice tracks for shows on any number of stations.

News and newstalk formats are the most expensive formats for the simple reason that they are people-intensive. Syndication made sense to meet cost efficiencies. News departments were either reduced in size or dismantled.

Today, a major market station in a radio group often does the local news for stations the group owns in other markets, typically within the geographical region. For instance, Clear Channel’s Tampa newstalk station has been doing newscasts for a number of their stations in other Florida markets. Those other stations might have one or two reporters who feed stories into Tampa that are then played in the smaller station’s “local” newscast.

Further, AM radio has been losing audience for years. Nationally, AM accounts for about 18-20% of the listening audience, and most of those listeners are beyond desirable demographics for advertisers. You may have noticed that many AM stations today, especially with news and newstalk (even sportstalk) formats are gravitating to FM. It only makes sense; that’s where most of the audience is, especially the demographically attractive listeners.

This is some of what led to WGST’s eventual surrender. But there are other reasons, as well. Losing its first FM frequency simulcast was a big blow. WGST’s AM signal, especially at night and in the first hours of morning drive, is very limited. Our FM simulcast (at 105.7) gave us significant coverage in the northern suburbs where much of our desired audience resided. The FM addition was a big boost to our audience. But, Clear Channel decided to yank that signal and make it a music station.

The Atlanta Braves were very important to us, too. We got the rights to the Braves just as their 14-year run in the post season was getting started. But, we lost the Braves after the 1994 season and that definitely was a hit to listenership.

However, our news and talk lineups still were solid. We had a superlative news staff that was aggressive, and clearly separate from our talk programming, as it should’ve been. And, we had solid talk talent, too. But panic set in after the Braves left us. And the result was, looking back, the beginning of the end.

WGST kept changing in big, and even small, ways and newstalk stations cannot survive like that. They are habit and appointment listening stations. Newstalk listeners feel very possessive of their stations.

They feel like the station is part of their family, and they do not like a lot of change. Constant change creates churn. That, coupled with no FM simulcast, were a prescription for disaster. Plus, the market has a fair amount of newstalk competition, and the big dog is WSB Radio, with a big signal, an FM simulcast, and deep pockets.

A relatively recent addition of a much weaker FM simulcast (92.3) to WGST (640 AM) was way too little, and way too late.

The signal weaknesses and constant change aren’t good for advertisers, either. And, yes, profit is important, even if Bain Capital were not involved.

So, years of questionable programming decisions played a major role in leading WGST to where it is today. Looking back, WGST was not the only victim of poor programming decisions. At one time, Clear Channel owned three great brands in Atlanta: WGST (a/k/a “The News Monster), WPCH (Peach) and WKLS (96 Rock). All three have been blown up.

In other words, don’t blame Mitt Romney. You can reach Seidel, who now operates a media training firm, by clicking here.

- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

60 comments Add your comment

Richard Adams

October 2nd, 2012
9:54 am

Your Don’t Blame Blaine article was interesting but left me with the why not blame Clear Channel, thus Baine. Why did Clear Channel let go of the FM simulcast? Why did Clear Channel let go of the Braves? Why did Clear Channel make frequent policy/programming changes to WGST? Sounds to me like up might blame Clear Channel/Baine.

Carol

October 2nd, 2012
12:53 pm

CB
cc, It is not profitable because liberals aren”t as angry as you conservatives. Use to tune into Boortz until his program morph into a anti Obama rant. I couldn’t tolerate him any more. And now Limbaugh, no way . Satelite radio is looking better and better.
+++++++

I’m with you. Used to love to listen to WGST. In fact, they were my first introduction to talk radio. But the hate started before Obama. It was Rush during the Clinton years. Then Hannity who was only 2 more hours of the past 3. It got to be way too toxic.

heartofdarkness

October 2nd, 2012
1:12 pm

How many times since the 1950’s has the AM radio frequency band become worthless? Until you can get a license included with your baseball card and gum, the stations will continue to deteriorate, because they can not afford to hire someone who attracts large numbers of 14-34 year olds. Somewhere in the not too distant future, a kid in his basement will start connecting with people via his webpage and will want to stay connected during the workday commute and at the worksite. His listeners will be referred to as “tweeters” or some other messaging format and he will use the AM band because it is local and the cheapest networking communication system available. If you have the audience, the rest is just leveraging the distribution channels.

heartofdarkness

October 2nd, 2012
1:12 pm

How many times since the 1950’s has the AM radio frequency band become worthless? Until you can get a license included with your baseball card and gum, the stations will continue to deteriorate, because they can not afford to hire someone who attracts large numbers of 14-34 year olds. Somewhere in the not too distant future, a kid in his basement will start connecting with people via his webpage and will want to stay connected during the workday commute and at the worksite. His listeners will be referred to as “tweeters” or some other messaging format and he will use the AM band because it is local and the cheapest networking communication system available. If you have the audience, the rest is just leveraging the distribution channels.

honested

October 2nd, 2012
1:33 pm

At least the mis-leaders have moved to another local station.

Otherwise we would be faced with half the population (the conserrrrrrrrvatives) unable to decide what to do next. They’d be at the gas station trying to remember what to do with the hose, walking aimlessly up and down the aisles of a supermarket, willingly paying their taxes without carping….
Of course when it came time to vote, they would be unsure of which wrong-wing nut to pick…
and that would be a good thing.

ANGRY AS HELL

October 2nd, 2012
1:40 pm

Hey, td, before you throw bombs at MSNBC, I’d love to hear your take on the “fair and balanced” approach taken by Fox News to be the mouthpiece for the GOP, and for the likes of Sean Vannity and that phony womanizer Bill O’Reilly. Those two (and Rush “The Pill Popper and Draft Dodger” Limbaugh) may have a real rough time on the morning of November 7th if their efforts to turn the White House over to a cabal of right wingers doesn’t pan out.. What will they say to the American voter if things turn out not thye way they wanted? And BTW, what will YOU say about this considering how convinced you’ve been that Obama was going to get beat real bad? HMMM??

Jon Lester

October 2nd, 2012
2:16 pm

Be that as it may, this is the same Clear Channel that saw fit to lay off over a thousand employees just so it could renew Rush Limbaugh’s contract. You can’t tell me that was done to satisfy what the radio industry used to call “community needs.”

lola

October 2nd, 2012
2:53 pm

Whether your right or left, this is one of the dumbest business decisions I have ever seen, Good luck WGST i give you six months.

Odio a los hombres blancos enojados

October 2nd, 2012
6:59 pm

Y’all are missin’ the bloomin’ point.

It doesn’t matter what or who may or may not have been responsible for the beginning of WGST’s so-called “downfall” and the “horror” of having another Spanish language radio station in Atlanta “for all the people working down at the taco bar.” (Which, by itself, is offensive enough to be remarkable. Broadcasting in Spanish, all by itself, cannot and should not be considered a “downfall.”) Personally, I think Mr. Seidel may have started WGST’s downfall by dropping CBS radio news on the hour, thereby shortening hourly newscasts to make room for more talk (or more accurately, perhaps, more commercials). But that’s just a personal opinion. Yours may vary.

What is relevant is that Bain took over the station in 2008, irrespective of whether WGST was in decline at the time. If they were in decline, then why did Bain buy it? Were they looking to make money, or position themselves for a tax writeoff, just like the WKRP in Cincinnati TV show?

Bain has a history of buying companies and shutting them down, all the while making money for their investors. In the process, a lot of good people are fired and left to fend for themselves. Isn’t that what happened here? If they can make more money syndicating Limbaugh to a bigger, more established station (WSB), why wouldn’t they do so and shut down WGST? (Remember, Clear Channel owns Premier Networks, which in turn is owned by Bain.) That just means fewer people to pay to maintain WGST, which can be written down in value, and more income for a subsidiary company. All, presumably, to obtain tax advantages.

WGST may yet make good money broadcasting in Spanish despite the incredible hatred of Mexicans that I see in some of the blogs here. If they do, then you should support what Clear Channel did — it is pure capitalism. If they don’t, then you should at least recognize what they have really done and why they probably did it. And in the latter case, it matters not a whit that Bain had nothing to do with the initial part of WGST’s “demise.”

And no, I don’t think that Bain is doing this to gain Hispanic support of Republicans. The entire area in which WGST is listenable, day and night, is in a solidly red state. They wouldn’t “sacrifice” a radio station or the good will of y’all to curry favor with a group of people whose support they don’t need to carry the state.

But to do it for money — that’s another matter. And I think you got Bained.

Dale Russell

October 2nd, 2012
8:44 pm

WGST NewsRadio gave me my first broadcasting job. 1979. I wrote sports copy for Denis O’Hayer on week ends. I still marvel at his depth of knowledge and talent. WGST in its day, was loaded with talented reporters, producers, and managers. Many are household names in this city today. Others moved on to various networks. I hate to see it change. But, what a run we had. 106.7 is the closest thing we have in Atlanta to the old WGST. Give it a listen. And, thanks for the memories.