Kasim Reed warns against ‘backseat quarterbacking’ on TSPLOST

Various number-crunchers tell us that the one place that treated the TSPLOST favorable in metro area was the city of Atlanta itself, which approved the transportation sales tax by a margin of 58 to 42 percent.

See a quick chart here. Other coverage can be found here. As a whole, Fulton County defeated the measure, 70,488 votes to 66,147. The sales tax also lost in DeKalb County, 61,792 to 57,915.

The city results are good news for Mayor Kasim Reed, who became the loudest voice for the referendum in the final weeks of the campaign – and who stands for re-election next year.

Below is a file from my AJC colleague Jeremiah McWilliams, on Reed and the final moments of last night’s doings:

Speaking at a subdued press conference late Tuesday night at the Marriott Marquis in downtown Atlanta, Reed was stoic in defeat.

“I’m here to stick out my chin and take the loss, to accept the loss … but to ask in a respectful way that we really do sit down and not wait six or eight or 10 years but work on it right away. Because the future belongs to those who figure it out. … We’re going to have to have politics of cooperation if we’re going to meet these big challenges.”

The first-term mayor embraced Metro Atlanta Chamber president Sam Williams, shook a few hands and walked off stage.

Speaking to reporters moments later, Reed warned against “backseat quarterbacking.” He said early vote totals hurt the campaign, as did the July 31 date and the hemorrhaging of Republican votes in the closing weeks of the campaign.

“Everyone deserves a fair share of responsibility,” Reed said. “We caught a couple of tough breaks…This is not really a time to blame anyone.”

“I think we have to get everyone at the table. I don’t think failing to move forward is an option. Most regions require more than one bite at the apple to achieve this (referendum-based traffic solutions). I wanted us to achieve it on the first try.”

Reed tipped his cap at the opposition.

“I’ve been in this business a long time,” he said. “I respect elections, and I respect results….I congratulate the folks who prevailed. I respect them.”

Reed said another traffic-oriented referendum “has to happen in the future,” calling that approach “the only method to try to fund the traffic improvements you need.”

“(But) I don’t know if it will be tried by me and my colleagues,” he said.

Reed said he believed the campaign failed for deeper reasons than a project list that drew many critics.
“We lost the ‘confidence in government’ argument,” he said. “And the argument around whether our projects are transformational.”

Reed said he felt the need to jump into the campaign in a dramatic way two weeks ago after internal polls showed support slipping. After the business community helped raise $8 million for the pro-tax campaign, backing away “would have sent a terrible national message” about the seriousness of Atlanta’s leadership, he said.
“People took real risks in the process,” Reed said, citing Gov. Nathan Deal and others.

“I did everything I can,” Reed told a television reporter.

It was shortly before midnight. The party had already broken up.

- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

157 comments Add your comment

double

August 2nd, 2012
9:14 am

At times we elect,not knowing the person.Then as now we elect knowing,so if you get the shaft ,you voted for it.

hiram

August 2nd, 2012
9:38 am

td
August 2nd, 2012
8:56 am

” If you want to compare money value of such legislation then you would have to say that Roy is the most corrupt because the law reform allowing more suing in consumer matters and then the power to appoint all those judges has made him extremely wealthy after he left office.”

You are quoting Deal’s smear campaign verbatim. Here’s Barne’s rebuttal to the specific accusations you are citing, which I’m sure you haven’t read, because you don’t won’t be confused with facts.

http://www.roy2010.com/images/stories/39.pdf

td

August 2nd, 2012
9:55 am

hiram

August 2nd, 2012
9:38 am

So Deal’s campaign said what I had been saying for years when Deal was still a Democrat. Where is the independent rebuttal? Of coarse the Barnes campaign would deny that he enriched himself, they all do. Common sense tells any reader that Barnes was the leading advocate to change the consumer protection laws and a result was that his law firm made more money in the 8 years since his term then the previous 30 years in business. Now did Barnes change the law just for his own personal gain that also benefited the citizens of the state or did he change the law for the benefits of the citizens and it also happen to make him more wealthy?

Like I said before everyone running for office is it it for themselves as well as for the citizens and to believe otherwise proves how little a person knows about human nature and politics.

oldfart

August 2nd, 2012
10:11 am

Like it or not the only Governor in recent years that was less than wealthy after his term in office was Lester Maddox. I went to his estate sale and he had a black and white 8 X 10 on the wall depicting himself and Hosea Williams, each wearing overalls and posing with an arm around each other. It was inscribed; “To Lester Maddox, The most honest Governor Georgia ever had. Hosea Williams”.

Wondering

August 2nd, 2012
11:32 am

For all of you that complain about too high state taxes, please look at http://taxfoundation.org/maps. The issue is not state, or even local. It’s federal. Also, remember that 50% ($19.2 billion of $39.5 billion) of the state’s spending in Georgia is actually pass through from the feds.

I voted against T-SPLOST but not because of taxes. Corruption and lack of accountability were both significant. Also, every study I read and trusted indicated the ten year tax would have marginal to no benefit.

Ole Guy

August 2nd, 2012
12:14 pm

Never mind the back seat qb…this entire event spells out/no, make that SCREAMS out the governments’ refusal to listen to the people; to govern, NOT by their own agenda, but by the (how did those 9th grade civics books call it…oh yeah) WILL OF THE PEOPLE. After expending…what was it…some 8 mil (against the oppositions’ coupla thousand), these people seem perfectly willing to expend yet more of the same, all the while yelping “NO MONEY, WE GOTTA LAY OFF TEACHERS, OH MY, THE SKY’S FALLING”! GD POLITICIANS…

mensa141

August 2nd, 2012
3:13 pm

In this digital world why do we feel the need to have any businesses downtown – any downtown? Anachronistic perhaps?