Get ready for that Tuesday night miracle

Prepare for a miracle next week. And we’re not talking about the transportation sales tax. Not exactly.

At midnight, as Tuesday turns to Wednesday, a layer of fairy dust will fall across Georgia, and your state government will suddenly become a model of competency and efficiency.

That’s because the contest for the transportation sales tax – win or lose – will come to an end that day. In its place, a new, November ballot campaign will rise up, aimed at restoring the state Capitol’s authority to compel local systems to accept public charter schools.

Georgia Republicans have been looking forward to this new fight. The TSPLOST argument has been uncomfortable, splitting two crucial GOP constituencies – its business wing and its anti-tax base. Little else unites the GOP, on a state or national level, like the belief that our educational bureaucracy is a Gordian knot that requires a swift, sharp sword.

You think that, 24 hours after the last vote on the transportation sales tax is cast, Nathan Deal might be crying in his beer? No, next Wednesday night, the governor will be at Bones restaurant in Buckhead, happily raising cash at $1,000-a-head for the charter school campaign. Special honors will go to those who donate $5,000 or $10,000.

It will be an expensive campaign, only in part because the largest part of the state’s educational establishment – school boards, superintendents and PTA chapters in 180 systems – have lined up against it.

Much of the money raised will be required to adjust philosophies that have been hardened during the debate over the transportation sales tax and the $8 billion it would raise statewide. And fairy dust is expensive.

Transportation tax opponents who have been arguing that state government can’t be trusted to tie its own shoes, and that the sovereignty of local governments must be protected at all costs, will have to suddenly believe that Atlanta knows best after all.

As with the TSPLOST issue, look for an argument over the wording of the ballot question. In November, voters will be asked: “Should the Constitution of Georgia be amended to allow state or local approval of public charter schools upon the request of local communities?”

It is the word “or” that rankles opponents of the charter school question. Those of you who diagrammed sentences in elementary school know that you can remove that word “or” and one of its partner words, and the slightly altered sentence still stands, like this: “To allow state approval of public charter schools upon the request of local communities.”

State officials say local school systems wouldn’t be financially penalized should the state assign them a charter school. But dwindling cash will be, in fact, at the root of this campaign.

My Journal-Constitution colleague Wayne Washington has mined one of the most important stats likely to be bandied about in the charter school fight. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, local local school systems across the nation are paying a higher share of the cost of public education than state governments for the first time in 16 years.

In 2010, Georgia’s public primary and secondary schools received 38 percent of their funding from the state. Local school systems were responsible for 48 percent. Federal and private sources made up the rest, according to the census bureau.

Thirty-eight percent is a shaky, minority perch from which to make demands.

Now, the state has its own numbers that can be used to argue it remains the big dog in school funding. According to Department of Education statistics, the state last year picked up 48 percent of the cost of education, compared to 41 percent put up by local systems. But these DOE figures omit capital costs – money spent on the physical upkeep of old buildings, the constructions of new ones and such.

Cedric Johnson, an educational analyst with the Georgia Budget & Policy Institute, called the census bureau numbers — which spotlight the shrinking state role — “reliable and useful.”
So did Alvin Wilbanks, who since 1996 has been the superintendent for the Gwinnett County school system, one of the largest in the state.

“If you take the total budget for this current year – we’ll spend about 47 percent local, about 45 percent state, and there’s about 8 percent federal,” Wilbanks said.

“Since they’ve started the austerity reductions – that’s what they call budget cuts – that has really changed the dynamics of school funding,” he said. “The percentage the state’s putting in is the lowest since I’ve been in this business.”

The ebb and flow of the charter school fight could be eerily similar to the transportation sales tax campaign. Rural Georgia, where education money is tightest, is considered hostile territory. Any margin of victory will come from metro Atlanta.

And like the campaign for the transportation sales tax, some public officials will try to stay out of its way. Asked whether he would campaign for the charter school question, state School Superintendent John Barge expressed a fondness for charter schools in an email, but added this: “We will, of course, respect the will of the citizens of Georgia regarding how charter schools are authorized.”

But Barge offered the possibility that money might quiet the coming argument. “I hope that the coming budget cycle will see some restoration of the past 10 years of austerity reductions to local school systems [that] are struggling to meet the very basic educational needs of students,” he wrote.

- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

55 comments Add your comment

ByteMe

July 26th, 2012
9:54 am

The real issue here is state control. If you vote “Yes” on the constitutional amendment, you are voting to give the state government the right to overide the wishes of local school boards by setting up state charter schools anywhere they want. So much for “smaller government” and “local control”!

This.

Hog

July 26th, 2012
10:48 am

There is little wrong with public schools besides the mandated focus on testing and students who do not want to be at school. I’m a teacher in a rural public school in south GA. If someone would let us rid the mainstream classroom of the typical 3-4 really disruptive kids in every class of around 30, teachers could actually teach your children. Also, even with the chronically misbehaved out of the room, we’re still left with the fact that many on the remaining kids don’t care. I have taught lessons, done jam up reviews for unit exams, given extremely straight forward study guides for relatively easy tests, and still had over half the kids in a room fail the test. I am sad to say this is typical too. Yet what is always constant is that most kids don’t study, or they say that they studied the guide for five minutes before the test. I do always ask questions to find out what went wrong. I am so saddened each time this happens. I never get to feel like a winner despite much work on my lessons even after school at home. Teachers cannot monitor what students do outside the classroom, and values are taught at home. To fix the public schools I say first rid it of the disruptive kids. Also, our society has got to embrace the truth. Teachers are not causing the problem. Some parents are just not providing their children with “home training” as my students say. Do not kill the public schools. Fix them by focusing on the real problem. I pay my taxes, and I’d like for my kids to attend a public school.

already done

July 26th, 2012
2:20 pm

“The Republicans are trying to destroy Public Schools.”

Government schools were already circling the drain. Number and enrollment at private schools has got to be going through the roof.

Vote no Tsplost

July 26th, 2012
4:36 pm

“We will, of course, respect the will of the citizens of Georgia regarding how charter schools are authorized.”
This goes with out saying, and, smells a bit like arrogance.

Here is one NO VOTE.

Jerry Eads

July 26th, 2012
9:47 pm

Fascinated that these Republicans want STATE government control of schools. Not ever to be even remotely confused with conservatism, I guess. If they want to take it to that level, shouldn’t they logically be even happier with federal control?