Clearly, a bill to encourage the use of solar power is now the hottest item in the state Capitol.
SB 401, sponsored by state Sen. Buddy Carter, R-Pooler, originally had been shunted by Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle to the Senate Natural Resources Committee, where it was to be studied to death.
So on Thursday, an impatient Carter — opposed by Georgia Power, electrical membership corporations, and the Georgia Chamber of Commerce — brought SB 401 to the Senate committee that oversees utility legislation, where many think the measure ought to have been brought in the first place. Carter attempted to attach his bill to another piece of legislation intended to allow paranoid homeowners to opt out of wireless metering systems.
The concept offered by Carter is complicated, but my AJC colleague Kristina Torres has this explanation:
The most controversial aspect of Senate Bill 401 would allow outside companies to install, own and maintain alternative energy systems, in return for customers agreeing to a long-term contract to pay for the electricity generated by that system.
Conservative Republicans like Carter, as well as Senate President pro tem Tommie Williams, R-Lyons, have latched onto the issue as a matter of property rights, forming a rare alliance with environmental groups.
Lobbyists packed a hearing room on the fourth floor of the Capitol, where a clearly ticked-off Carter fired this opening salvo aimed squarely at Georgia Power:
”I’m not going to tell you that, just because the average price of electricity has increased over 49 percent in the past seven years, just because the fourth quarter profits in 2011 for Georgia Power were over 70 percent of what they were the same period the year before, that just because energy prices in the Southeast are 20 to 30 percent higher than they are in other areas of the nation – I’m not going to tell you that Georgia Power is a bad company. They are not a bad company.
“What I am going to tell you is that I disagree with Georgia Power on this particular item. I believe that in this particular situation, that Georgia Power is behind the times. Because if we look, we can see that 45 states in this nation allow this. Georgia is one of only five states in the nation that do not allow power-purchase agreements.
Consumer guru Clark Howard argues on Thursday for a bill to encourage the use of solar panels and other forms of alternative energy.
“…I recognize that this is a David-and-Goliath fight. I recognize that Georgia Power is the strongest lobbying group in this Capitol, the strongest lobbying group in this state…But I will point this out, and I want to make it absolutely clear. In my mind, private property rights are paramount to us as citizens of this state. In my mind, the burden of truth – when we take away property rights from those individuals – lies on those who are trying to take away those property rights.”
The first witness was Clark Howard, the consumer guru of AM750 and 95.5FM News/Talk WSB. He sat down, but immediately turned his head to address the crowd behind him:
”First, I’d like to say something, if I could to the folks from Georgia Power. I want to tell you, I think you’re very decent people working for a good company. I think you’re as misguided as all get-out.”
Howard then turned his head back to the senators:
“…The old-fashioned method of how power was generated in this country [has] worked great for the last 80 years. You had central production stations where coal, nuclear , hydro – whatever method it was, natural gas today – that energy was created from a central power station. We’d then have power that travels across transmission lines to people’s homes, schools, businesses, the rest. What’s changed in the last 10 years, and the reason 45 states have flown past us, is how power is generated now. It’s no longer necessary to be centralized. Today the technology makes it so easy to generate power so many different ways…”
Howard’s prop was a 1984 touch-tone phone, some version of which all consumers were once required to use if they wanted phone service.
(Please note that WSB Radio and this newspaper are both owned by the same entity, Cox Media Group.)
Kyle Leach, director of resource policy and planning at Georgia Power, sought to reframe the argument:
”We do not view this as a property-rights issue. We do not view this as a free-market issue. We’ve also heard this bill characterized as a financing bill.”
Leach then drew the committee’s attention to the language of the bill that permits the leasing of solar panels and other devices:
”That’s literally an agreement between a buyer and a seller of electricity. Our company enters into PPAs all the time – power purchase agreements. …Literally, it is a contract to sell electricity. That is where we have great concerns about this legislation. Because it introduces a whole new class of electricity suppliers into this state. Basically, it’s deregulation.
“…As far as we can tell, these new suppliers are not bound by the Public Service Commission. There’s no oversight. They’re not bound by an EMC board of directors or municipal city council or elected officials.”
In addition, Leach said, when the sun doesn’t shine, or the wind doesn’t blow, alternative energy users will require back-up power from Georgia Power or an EMC, which will be stuck with the costs of providing the infrastructure to deliver the energy.
The bill was eventually tabled, But look for it to rise again, in some form.
***
On the presidential front, the campaign of President Barack Obama entered the GOP debate in Michigan over the wisdom of bailing out the Detroit-based automotive industry with this TV ad:
***
And within the Republican field, Mitt Romney continued his effort to tie the front-running Rick Santorum to his former U.S. Senate colleague Arlen Specter, a Republican-turned-Democrat:
***
Newt Gingrich continues to fill out his Georgia schedule. He’ll be in Cherokee County, at the county’s GOP headquarters at 11 a.m. on March 1. That’s the day that had been scheduled for a now-cancelled televised debate in Atlanta.
***
Gingrich has also settled on the Renaissance Atlanta Waverly Hotel in the Cumberland area of Cobb County for his March 6 Super Tuesday party – a traditional GOP gathering place since the Reagan era.
***
The AJC’s Politifact Georgia today tests Newt Gingrich’s assertion that “you can’t put a gun rack in a Chevy Volt.”
- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider
For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.
62 comments Add your comment
Jeff is not kidding
February 24th, 2012
3:30 pm
Apparently Leach’s mind exists where the sun doesn’t shine.
Auntie Christ
February 24th, 2012
3:32 pm
uga 1899: I said the book of Genesis, not the bible. Way to obfuscate the issue, you’ve learned your lessons from hannity and orally very well. Twist someone’s words to make your argument seem plausible.
Saddam had no WMD at the time Bush said he did. Proof, he didn’t use them. Again, nice twist of words to make a specious argument seem plausible.
Maybe you’re right, not paying taxes doesn’t lead to deficits. I must be misinformed, since I seem to remember much being made of ‘the deficit’ by you tea baggers, and I seem to remember the deficits began when bush decided rich people didn’t have to pay taxes.
Come on back to reality, we don’t really miss you, but you are good for a laugh occasionally.
UGA 1999
February 24th, 2012
3:39 pm
Aunt….Hey genius, Genesis is the first book of the bible. WOW!
If Saddam had no WMD’s why did the Democrats vote to go to war? You do realize that right?
Care to compare Bush spending versus Obama? How about unemployment, how about gas prices?
NEXT!
honested
February 24th, 2012
4:02 pm
uga,
Maybe the Democrats didn’t realize they were being lied to when the cast the unfortunate vote.
Scott Ritter certainly knew they were being lied to and the rethugs did everything possible to silence him.
By the way, where are the sweets and flowers and when does the oil cause the war to ‘pay for itself’ since it seems we are still on the hook for 3 trillion.
It is easy to hide a point or two of unemployment when you have a substantial number of our youth on active duty and those mercenarys known as ‘contractors’ listed as doing useful work.
honested
February 24th, 2012
4:06 pm
uga,
While I understand you have a certain self assumed financial obligation to do nothing but parrot wrong wing talking points, how about breaking with the past and speak to the topic of the thread?
The heated debate over solar power – Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) : doing-it-green.com: wind solar energy resellers
February 24th, 2012
4:16 pm
[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) [...]
dan
February 24th, 2012
4:35 pm
“Democrats would tax it and make it mandetory so we would have to spend MORE money …”
not a single time in the history of the Democratic party has this happened. Not Once.
This idiocy is exactly what is getting the RNC votes. “Here’s a Lie. I’ll vote against it”
td
February 24th, 2012
4:42 pm
Let us move the clock forward 10 years from now if this bill passes.
Democrats: GP has to raise its rates because to many people are using solar power now. It is UNFAIR that those evil rich are not paying their FAIR share for energy and the poor can not afford the equipment.
Dem Solution: We must tax the rich more and give the solar panels to the poor so they do not have to pay those evil monopoly prices.
honested
February 24th, 2012
5:24 pm
td,
You have taken waxing absurd to a new level.
GP/SouCo is one of the only entities in our daily lives that is able to GUARANTEE their absurdly high and constant ‘profit’ level by the method of purchasing the best PSC candidates money can buy and lobbying the Senate (they can usually buy off House members with candy bars and wax lips) with unlimited funds (derived from rate payers).
Rate payers are rate payers (regardless of income level) and if power grid demand is reduced, GA Power might just have to ‘live within it’s means’ and explain to shareholders that there just isn’t a sure thing when it comes to investment any more. Greater use of PV panels and increased manufacture does/has/will lower the unit cost. Anyone who has access to sun is a potential customer for their own PV generation of for a company willing to take the RISK (a concept that is alien to GA Power) that it might generate power and profit.
That is how the ‘market’ is supposed to work isn’t it?
The Goobernator
February 24th, 2012
5:32 pm
Dang! TD You don’t frickin’ get it. This bill allows free enterprise to partner with property owners to produce power and sell the excess back to GA PWR. There are no tax breaks, additional taxes, subsidies or government investment. There is no capital investment from GA PWR. This bill creates free enterprise and electricity that GA PWR must buy. It removes the restrictions that the solar equipment and property owner must be the same entity. Don’t you get it? GA PWR does not want homeowners to own solar equipment, produce excess power and distribute it back to the grid! They prefer making the consumer pay for their equipment, nuclear plants, coal plants etc. with rate hikes while making a guaranteed profit that the PSC gives them on an annual basis.
td
February 24th, 2012
6:11 pm
The Goobernator
February 24th, 2012
5:32 pm
I guess you my friend do not understand sarcasm.
Tommy Franklin
February 25th, 2012
5:19 pm
These corporations purchase politicians for chump change. And they will continue to lie to our face, lie to their customers, lie to their employees and lie to their shareholders.
The citizenry has been so dumbed down, that we actually tolerate corporations making laws that prevent us from solving our own requirements for energy creation. Its such a sad day in America to see this bill shoved to the trash again. Meanwhile the entire world allows Power Purchase Agreements because private citizens want to sign in to them.
Georgia politicians have lied to us for so long, we don’t even mind the ugliness of it all.