This one’s likely to light up the blogosphere. From the Associated Press:
State attorneys are appealing a judge’s order that favored five fathers who are targeting Georgia’s practice of jailing parents who don’t pay child support.
The Georgia Attorney General’s office on Monday filed a motion that said there’s an “epidemic” of parents who fail to pay their child support. It said the men were jailed because of the “consequences of their own poor decision-making.”
The five fathers claim in the lawsuit that jailing parents who can’t afford to pay child support creates a modern day debtor’s prison. They want to force Georgia to provide poor defendants with attorneys at child support hearings.
The men recently won a court battle when a judge allowed thousands of other parents who were imprisoned for failing to pay the child support join their lawsuit.
My AJC colleague Bill Rankin has some excellent background on the situation, which includes this:
Emotions run extraordinarily high in cases involving custody and support; angry ex-spouses often are all too happy to see the other parent jailed, and judges, weary of excuses from deadbeats, often oblige them.
In Georgia, after finding a parent in contempt, judges set a “purge fee,” which is typically below the amount of child support that is owed. If the parent can pay the purge fee, he or she can avoid being sent to jail.
Over the past decade, 3,612 people — each serving an average of 127 days — were incarcerated in Gwinnett County for failing to pay child support, according to jail records.
“We’ve seen some who’ve been jailed come up with $15,000 to $20,000 in a couple of days,” Sheriff Butch Conway said. “Some will languish for months and not be able to come up with $100 to $200. Some can’t pay it but, sadly, I think some do have the money but just don’t want to pay.”
- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider
For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.
145 comments Add your comment
michael g.
January 30th, 2012
5:12 pm
Take care of your kids! It is willful neglect to not pay child support. Jail is too good an option for those losers!
Look before I leap...
January 30th, 2012
5:15 pm
Seizure of assets and wage garnishment would seem to be a more productive approach with the added benefit of not having to pay the cost of jailing these guys.
Attack Dog
January 30th, 2012
5:15 pm
I guess these “deadbeats” are trying to get a Joe Walsh Pass.
Double Zero Eight
January 30th, 2012
5:16 pm
The epitome of a “vicious cycle”.
C.Payne
January 30th, 2012
5:20 pm
I’m not sure why a right to counsel doesn’t apply in these cases. Yes, I know that child support is a civil matter, not a crminal one, but they can still result in jail time. There is a difference between someone who refuses to pay child support and someone who lacks the financial means to make the payments. Those in the former group will pony up the money when faced with jail time, while those in the latter group just end up in prison. While in prison, they’re certainly not making any money to make their support payments. It ssems completely counter-productive to put a destitute parent in jail for failure to pay child support, and thereby prevent them from doing anything to change their destitute status.
GaBlue
January 30th, 2012
5:31 pm
Here’s how it REALLY works in Georgia:
Couple divorces, judge orders child support/amount. Deadbeat parent (DBP)(not always the dad) doesn’t pay, or doesn’t pay in full. Custodial parent (CP) has to PAY A LAWYER (with what????) to even address the court to complain that DBP isn’t paying as ordered. Judge says, “Pay up,” and everybody goes home. Later, when DBP parent still does not pay as ordered, CP has to PAY A LAWYER (with what????) to even address the court to complain that DBP does not pay as ordered. Judge says, “Pay up,” and everybody goes home. Later, when DBP parent still does not pay, CP has to PAY A LAWYER to even address the court to complain that DBP does not pay as ordered. Lather, rinse, repeatedly line lawyer’s pockets. At some point, CP shows up for court and is led into a MEDIATION ROOM where DB parent whines to a mediator. CP tells everyone in a room to (*expletives deleted*) and storms out. Years and tens of thousands in lawyer fees later, Judge finallly agrees to garnish DBP’s wages, IF THERE ARE ANY.
I can’t imagine what these deadbeats are doing to actually get locked up for what is totally run-of-the-mill around here. The only thing the family court system accomplishes in this state is making lawyers rich.
david lance
January 30th, 2012
5:46 pm
I worked 2 jobs for years to pay my child support. I gave up free time and any kind of social life to do what was right. I have watched many people take the easy way out. Jail is too good for them. I personally know someone who is over 30,000 dollars behind and he gets a slap on the wrist. Put the SOB’s in jail and leave them there.
Paddy O
January 30th, 2012
5:52 pm
david lance – that is vengence & punitive – which the taxpayer simply picks up even more of a tab. It appears to me to be counter productive. Which begs the question: Are the child support demands reasonable? Should they be capped at a certain max of annual income ( ala Obama’s repay plan for college loans)?
markie mark
January 30th, 2012
5:56 pm
Paddy…..can you cap the amount of money it takes to raise a child today?
InAtl
January 30th, 2012
5:59 pm
Not paying court-ordered child support is contempt of court. Why should deadbeat parents be the only ones not to go to jail for this?
heartofdarkness
January 30th, 2012
6:01 pm
Handling these matters with dispatch administratively and allowing arrearages to be worked off on public works projects might serve justice better than the present system
buckhead benny
January 30th, 2012
6:01 pm
You guys are full of sh*t- I have been thru this and I have been paying my ex wife in old income amounts that came out during when my decree was issued in 2008- since I am self employed they took my 2007 tax returns which were 3 times the amount I made before the recession hit- So I was paying close to 3k in child support bills every month- ( you can only modify your decree every two years- a little well known fact- and guess what most ex spouses won’t voluntarily lower your payments- and for some reason the courts don’t want to jump in unless you have the means to draw up a petition to challenge the courts to reset the amount-
Your even more screwed if you own your own business like me- since then your not a w-2 employee and a lot of times you don’t know exactly what your going to make until the year is over and then you have to prepare for what your deductions are- so a lot of guys have been unfairly labeled as deadbeats- for example, I had 60 percent less in just gross deposits to my business than what my income was listed as to the courts from the year before but I was totally screwed because of what I made pre recession-
There are hundred’s of thousands of men like me that are in that boat- and ex spouses seemed to love having you underneath their thumb- so trust me some of us pay over 36k a year for a 3 year old child to an ex spouse that has boyfriends live with her when your own child is there- so you guys have zero clue what your talking about-
If I have a bad month or two I could literally starve and have to borrow money to just eat on and it would matter nothing to nobody-
This laws were developed in the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s when women didn’t work- My ex wife makes 150k a year and literally had bled me for every dime thru attorney’s fees and child care costs which by the way are not take deductible so that 36,000 I paid add another 35 percent tax on top of that to the IRS and GA dept of revenue.
Its even worst for someone that doesn’t make much money they got no chance in hell of ever getting any just without an attorney to file on their behalf-
Judges know this and see women every day making up bs and playing the pity game- Now are there deadbeat dads yes- but I can guarantee you this and ask around women get the better end of the stick in 2000’s and today- No doubt about it- if your 30 days late your consider a dead beat? you have to show willful contempt by the way which is a big difference-
ATLGAL
January 30th, 2012
6:04 pm
TAKE CARE OF YOUR CHILDREN AND YOU WONT HAVE TO GO TO JAIL!! WE ARE TIRED OF LAZY NO GOOD PARENTS OUT HERE THAT WANT TO LAY AND NOT PAY!!!
Bubba
January 30th, 2012
6:05 pm
My observation is that when judges order deadbeat dads to jail for failure to pay child support, money suddenly and magically appears. Of course, if the father is unable to come up with the money after some period of time, the judge should exercise the discretion to review the situation.
Bubba
January 30th, 2012
6:07 pm
Perhaps there should be a change in the law to permit modification of child support more often when the bottom falls out of income due to business conditions rather than a voluntary choice to give up a good salary, and greater consideration of circumstances of self-employed parents.
Sonny LIED!
January 30th, 2012
6:08 pm
I LIED and Galloway still knows it.
Aquagirl
January 30th, 2012
6:10 pm
it seems completely counter-productive to put a destitute parent in jail for failure to pay child support
Lock that ill-controlled trouser snake behind bars and it won’t be creating any more kids. If the idiot owner wants to detach it and send it to jail instead, I think that would be a wonderful option.
ld
January 30th, 2012
6:11 pm
Yes, it does; but in Georgia they are some times let out on “work release” w/ support going to the child and, if they stay in that job, they are then released but their wages garnished to pay both back and current support.
It does seem like there should be a better way.
I recall a case where a man (a trucker) had signed to give up his parental rights so his ex’s new hubby could adopt the child (he actually believed the child was not his but his ex’s new hubby’s child)–but the adoption did not occur so, when the child was 18, the mom sued for support and WON eighteen years worth.
ld
January 30th, 2012
6:12 pm
The best solution is birth control==men should NOT father children they are not prepared to support.
GaBlue
January 30th, 2012
6:14 pm
Yeah…. *snerk*… and you MARRIED a person like that because???
… because you thought she’d be sane and nurturing, a good nester, thrifty little saver, who’d always respect you, support your efforts, make all money decisions based on your joint, agreed-upon long-term goals and what’s best for the children, and be a sweet, caring, loving mother and wife who’d always put the family first?
Or… did you look past her fondness for $500 shoes & handbags, fancy cars, self-absorption, substance abuse, salon bills, and narcissistic demands because she was the HOTTEST thing that ever slept with you twice, and your friends were all, “Way to go, man?”
Where’s my violin?
tman
January 30th, 2012
6:16 pm
It is not a fair system all the way around especially how the payments are made no matter what the parents income is. This economy is bad. I lost my job and explained to the ex the same amount of money is not coming in. I got a sympathetic ear but how long is that going to last because she has no job herself. You can see that the support at times is household income and not exclusively spent on the child which becomes a problem. now those that have income and don’t pay garnishment and jail may be the answer. for those who have no income you can’t get a job while in jail and then penalties add to your debt while incarcerated. Not an easy answer?
Dave
January 30th, 2012
6:16 pm
I’m just thankful I was able to fulfill my commitments to all concerned …
just sayin'
January 30th, 2012
6:17 pm
Or be an awesome dad, pay LOTS of money ON TIME every month, and have the ex-wife tell the kids that their dad doesn’t give her enough money for their food…
ld
January 30th, 2012
6:18 pm
Sadly, fathers who have children by different mothers usually end up neglecting the older ones until a court orders them to pay up or go to jail–then the younger ones end up doing w/o.
And yes, the change in Georgia is (or was) only permitted every three years; this should be more flexible in this economic environment–especially if the father is self-employed and TRYING to pay.
buckhead benny
January 30th, 2012
6:19 pm
There is no protection for a Dad that loses a job or there income goes down dramatically- This is why there becomes a Dad usually owing money to an ex spouse- The Dad doesn’t have the money to pay 5000k-10k to properly modify the decree- and also can’t within a 2 year window since the courts are so bogged down.
The way the system works now- if they see even any money go thru any of your accounts that money is supposed to go to the child first even if it is your power payment, your water payment, your tax payment, your diabetes medicine, they don’t care- and they can rule you in contempt just on that alone. That is archaic- especially if your ex spouse is doing well and you can show the kid is doing well- they should have a mititgating circumstance situation- There are none for child support-
that’s why you see dudes do crazy stuff like rob banks and stuff- people hate being labeled that- Trust me your taking the lowest of the lowest dudes on the planet and trying to say hard working dudes like myself who pay almost what someone’s salary is- I can watch my ex wife litteraly take trips with my 3 year old 8 times a year- and the courts will let random dudes and boyfriends live there since a lot of times they don’t want to appear to be old fashioned and out of touch to today’s times.
This is the truth but if I am 30 days late even though I may pay off in 60 days and the amount is a lot- then I am included in that amount- This is the majority of chicks out there today- they treat you (the dad) like a business deal period
Judges know this and so do women in general- Times have changed this isn’t the 60’s, 70’s, and 80’s- Women for the most part have it good today with this system and they know it-
Why do you think you see so many women going after professional athletes? they take your gross income and boom that’s what you get every month- So you think thats fair? Yeah, come live in my word and you would see what I am talking about- Have them add some safe guards that when you pay child support no random dudes get to live in the house that you pay child support for it- Little know fact guess what in Georgia they can- So get your facts straight.
ld
January 30th, 2012
6:22 pm
I know another case where an ex collected back child support from grown children from her spouses VA retirement benefits–both were in their sixties–how old was that claim? there should be a statute of limitations–if a spouse does not at least TRY to collect (via at least a gov’t claim via request for public assistence for which the DB would then repay) then, after eighteen (or less) years, her ‘rights’ to claim back support should end. (as in two cases mentioned prior)
Sometimes the delay in seeking support is to prevent the dad from seeking visitation–he thinks he’s home free, then WHAM, many years later.
asdf
January 30th, 2012
6:25 pm
Maybe there are no debtor’s prisons, but there needs to be a way to make their lives “less convenient”. This goes for people who don’t pay on judgments against them as well. At a miniumum, they should make debtors attend a class on why they should pay, twice a month, with the 1st at one end of the county in the morning, the 2nd at the other end of the county in the evening, to make sure it’s not convenient for anyone. Eventually, they’ll find it’s easier to just get a job and pay what they owe. If they don’t show up, they’d have to go before a judge another day to explain why they didn’t show.
GaBlue
January 30th, 2012
6:26 pm
“Yeah, come live in my word and you would see what I am talking about.”
No thanks. This is what worshipping money, superficial beauty, and material posessions has done to the American family. Those of you complaining about the condition of your bed seem to be skipping right past the part where YOU made that bed, chose that spouse, and accepted those expectations to begin with. Trust me, when you start OWNING what happened instead of blaming, your insides will finally begin to heal. Bless your hearts!
Amy
January 30th, 2012
6:27 pm
It’s not always the father’s fault – I personally know several men affected by the exporting of their jobs overseas to cheaper workers. Then no one here will hire them.
Why don’t we all take the impassioned approach and offer employment to these people? Why are we not solving the problem at hand?
SizzleChest
January 30th, 2012
6:30 pm
I had a judge order me to pay $3,200 to a debt collector ( old credit card).
If I don’t pay them, do I go to jail for contempt of court ?
No.
Child support is a civil, not a criminal matter.
Pleeeeze
January 30th, 2012
6:31 pm
Ok as a custodial parent if I refuse to provide financially for my chld which means I provide food and shelter then I can go to jail….but the non custodial parent should not go to jail for doing the same thing????????
tman
January 30th, 2012
6:32 pm
@ Amy you are correct but the economy is so tight and there are limited jobs and chances if you get one it will be less than yo were previously making. Something is better than nothing but i must admit our lifestyles have been built around two incomes for the middle class sadly.
Amy
January 30th, 2012
6:32 pm
And “Id” – there are a FEW bad apples out there so angry at the ex that they will torpedo all jobs to avoid paying up the money. There are women out there homeless thanks to these bad apples.
THAT is why some claims are allowed to be made from retirement accounts.
Pleeeeze
January 30th, 2012
6:32 pm
Oh by the way its called Child Abandoment…which is criminal not civil
Aquagirl
January 30th, 2012
6:34 pm
Hey, Benny, I’m so sorry to hear you were forced to marry this horrid, horrid woman and insert your pen!s in her, thus producing a baby. I’m sure all this happened at gunpoint. GaBlue whopped you over the head with the truth—you married her, that was your choice. If she’s that terrible nobody else is responsible for your dumb thrill over scoring a trophy wife.
Oh, and call a waaaaambulance before posting that next long, boring tl;dr screed, maybe they’ll actually listen to your sniveling.
Overhaul Child Support
January 30th, 2012
6:35 pm
One if my support is for the child I should get a receipt for every dime that was spent on the child. I have a case in my family where support was being paid voluntary 600 bucks a month every month for 7 years the age of the kids. The women tried to get free daycare thru the government. They order dude to court. First judge saw the agreement they had and threw it out. She tried it again another judge to my family member to cough up 600 dollars more in child support. He knows pay 1200 bucks a month because the woman kept trying to get free daycare from the government. My case is simple didnt know I had a son until he was 9 the mother of my child thought the child belong to someone else, we live in different states. Long story short dude got tested he wasnt the father one day I open my check up at work and I was being deducted for child support, no court, no dna. They can go in your bank and suspend your license jail is a bit much. If I was a mother I could leave my child at a fire station or hospital and thats ok if I get behind two months I am going to jail. Really.
GaBlue
January 30th, 2012
6:36 pm
On a positive note:
TO ALL THE MOMS AND DADS OUT THERE WHO PUT THE KIDS’ WELL-BEING FIRST — YOU’RE THE BEST! THANK YOU, THANK YOU, THANK YOU!
KeepItInYourPants
January 30th, 2012
6:37 pm
Don’t have children you are not willing to support.
Don’t have children with somebody you would not feel comfortable handing your kids over to for periods of time.
Don’t agree to something in mediation that you are not willing to do.
Don’t use your children as weapons because you hate the other parent.
You will get ZERO sympathy from me on this. After you have chosen to have children it is TOO LATE to whine about it or drop the ball. Support your children. Physically, financially and emotionally… or get the hell out of their lives.
Look before I leap...
January 30th, 2012
6:42 pm
Ya know, some guys don’t pay cuz they CAN’T pay, some don’t pay because they are selfish low life scum and and others are wrapped up in a war with a vindictive ex who is using the state legal system as a a weapon of vengeance.
Different reasons all and all with different solutions.
hmmm...really?
January 30th, 2012
6:44 pm
My daughter’s dad was ordered to pay 80 per month. Yes,$80a month ,and he still didnt pay every month. I say,throw their dead-beat asses under the jail… That is all.
dean
January 30th, 2012
6:44 pm
The state of Georgia does not allow shared parenting. The state of Georgia requires that the higher income parent is required to have thier rights terminated. Because the united states pays women only 77 cents for every dollar a man makes then this law requires the father to always be non-custodial. This leaves children to be constantly abused by the mothers boyfriends and this is why states must have a DFACS to investigate child abuse monday thru friday. God has forbidden social workers from working on the weekends so they send the child to the fathers for the weekend. My brother finually got custody after nine years. I hired seek custody lawyers when the child got abused but did not get custody until I hired the child a personal Injury lawyer. The state of Georgia does not require both parents to provide support , only the non-custodial parent . The custodial parent is allowed to draw welfare and food stamps because the state would never require a custodial parent to also provide support. I think all mothers on welfare should also be put In jail for not providing support. hopefully laws putting fathers in jail is what it will take for fathers to stop surrendering custody at the time of the devorce.
Michael
January 30th, 2012
6:45 pm
In June 2011, the US Supreme Court said it’s ok to jail people if they were provided sufficient information or safeguards to prevent mistaken incarceration, such as, telling them well before the court date that presenting evidence of inability to pay was a defense to contempt of a court order. Turner v Rogers, June 20, 2011. They also said there was no right to a lawyer at government expense to explain it to you.
All the states have joined into the interstate compact on child support recovery. The uniform law requires that child support services be given to both the payor and the payee. Therefore, if the deadbeat parent were to go to the child support office with unemployment stubs, then the child support office would be required to do something to get the child support adjusted. Most folks don’t realize that.
Aquagirl
January 30th, 2012
6:45 pm
My case is simple didnt know I had a son until he was 9 the mother of my child thought the child belong to someone else
Simple? BOY, millions of MEN go through life without unexpected children popping up like weeds. This is what’s known as “normal.” Apparently you don’t inhabit the same world as they do.
Both Sides
January 30th, 2012
6:45 pm
It’s easy to want to put someone in jail when you think that this is such a simple issue. It’s not. Child have become a commodity for some parents (especially woman). I know this from listening to their lunchroom conversations of how the “ex” was going to pay for their new car, funiture and vacation. Oh and I am a woman so to say I’m some woman hating man won’t apply here. Most of the time if someone would truly take a good look they would find the other parent not allowing the paying parent to see their children or worse yet turn them against them. Who wants to pay for a child you can’t have a relationship with. The courts want to be tough on parents that don’t pay but they do little or nothing to the parent that is doing just as much harm to a child. Parents that do receive child support should be made accountable for where they spend that money, trust me, more times than not it isn’t going to the children. It is also tax free to the person who receives it, yet, the paying parent has to pay taxes on it as it was income earned. How do you feel about someone receiving thousands of dollars taxed free every year to spend as they please? While at the same time turning the child against the parent that is paying…..we need to get tough on both sides. If we send one to jail then we should send both there as they are both committing criminal acts to a child.
Dude
January 30th, 2012
6:46 pm
If you can’t kiss a kids unwiped ass don’t have one. It’s that simple. They are complete crap. Newter yourself. Keep your cash. Bang a hooker if you need to.
hmmm...really?
January 30th, 2012
6:50 pm
Dude, PREACH!!!
Overhaul Child Support
January 30th, 2012
6:52 pm
@ David Lance….One thing I know about the child support system if you work two jobs and they see your income in greater than the original order they will order you to pay more in support. You sir are a liar.
DJ Sniper
January 30th, 2012
6:52 pm
I see there are a few people in here who seem to think that all men who have to deal with child support are deadbeats who don’t give a hoot about their children, and I’m willing to bet that most of these people are women. Ladies, there are plenty of men out here who get screwed over by the child support system not because they are bad parents, but because of other factors: job loss, medical issues, a vindictive ex, a set of laws that are clearly outdated, etc etc. Stop trying to put all men in the same box. If a man volutarily chooses not to provide for his children, then throw the book at him. Otherwise, find out more about the situation before making a judgement.
tman
January 30th, 2012
6:53 pm
Divorced in GA and made sure i had joint custody and rights to make decisions in regards to education and healthcare. I did not reliquish my custody because I knew i would not have any say in anything or activities. That is not fair that one parent is given all the decision making and the other just pays with all the penalties and no say. There was a fight over joint custody but i stood my grounds and the ex had no legitimate reason to deny me and the judge ordered it. i advise all parents do not give up your custody only if it is best for the child or children.
JM
January 30th, 2012
6:54 pm
Let’s make the law equitable. You want to put fathers who can’t pay child support in jail? Fine. Then also put in jail the mothers who spend the child support on themselves rather than the children who are supposed to be supported. How many times does a Dad pay thousands a month to support their kids, only to see his ex use that money to pay for a trip, or tennis lessons or spa treatments?
DJ Sniper
January 30th, 2012
6:56 pm
Even when men get custody of their children, the mother usually doesn’t get treated as bad as if things were reversed. A friend of mine got full custody of his daughter a few years ago because the mother was a complete wreck. She is thousands of dollars in arrears, yet the judge hasn’t done much to punish her at all. Every so often, she tries to drag him back to court for some sort of shenanigans, and the judge still won’t do anything.
Mr. Ected
January 30th, 2012
6:56 pm
Can’t earn a penny sitting in a pen.
If you want to punish the deadbeat dad, make him move back in with the ex.
TunaMan
January 30th, 2012
6:56 pm
Buckhead Benny you are correct there are tons of good men who do love there kids but the ex takes everything there needs to be a fair way for both to be able to live and take care of the kids
some do belong in jail some just need a fair break
Hands tied
January 30th, 2012
6:59 pm
I pay my ex child support every week on time – $640 month. It would make me happy if she spent SOME of that child support on the kids. My daughter begs me to buy her clothes, personal items and school supplies because her mother refers to child support as “her paycheck for having to take care of the kids”. There’s always plenty of beer, cigarettes, pot, clubbing on weekends and lottery tickets. She has been living off of child support for years. You need to understand why these so called dead beat dad’s are so frustrated. We can’t take care of our kids because we don’t have custody. All we can do is keep sending those checks.
Michael
January 30th, 2012
6:59 pm
As for outdated laws, Georgia’s has been around since 2007. I have had moms locked up for not paying child support. I have convinced judges not to lock up dads who don’t pay support.
The problem really is psychological. You get behind, you don’t know what to do, so you stop paying totally, even when you get a job again. If you go to court and say,well, I owed $1,000 per month but I paid $200 this month, $150 that month, and $600 the other, then maybe the judge will listen to you. But truth be told, if the children were with you would be doing something to put food in their mouths, shoes on their feet and somehow getting them to school.
give me a break
January 30th, 2012
6:59 pm
Some guys don’t pay cause they can’t pay is such a load of crap. Some mom’s can’t pay either but we do. We take on 2 or 3 jobs so that our kids can have a roof over their heads and food in their bellies. Some guys don’t pay because they know that we will do whatever it takes to take care of our kids. I am actually not in favor of the deadbeat being put in jail cause then I’m just supporting him with my tax dollars and I can’t afford that either. I realize he can’t work if he’s in jail so I don’t see how it’s benefiting his kids. Child support in my case was based on my income and his at the time of our divorce. I had to pay 60% of support to his 40% because my job paid more. Now I’ve lost that job and am making about a fourth of what I was making but guess what! I still have to feed, clothe and shelter my kids. Take responsibility as an adult, why should the kids suffer because you don’t want to pay your ex. And guess what its okay for the custodial parent to use child support to pay the rent because that is SHELTER for the kids.
tinkerella
January 30th, 2012
7:00 pm
Where have some of you been on these child support awards? Judges don’t just pull these numbers out of the sky. The income shares model has been in use since ‘06 or ‘07. And if your order is older, you can take it back to court for a modification. NCPs should shut and pay or practice better birth control.
And the previous poster is right…..all of this whole drama is set up to line the lawyers’ wallets.
spare me
January 30th, 2012
7:01 pm
No birthday gifts,no Christmas,not one football game..Always late with the $200 a month child support,and you want me to understand if you lose your job or if your hours are cut. Save it!I don’t give a crap if you had to be a male gigolo,or sale blood. One missed payment,and I’m calling enforcement.
Name (required)
January 30th, 2012
7:02 pm
What About the Moms??? I pay my child support and never have missed a payment, but my ex is so mad at me for leaving her that she uses our son as her weapon and controlling when I can see him. Yes, I have a fully defined parenting plan. But like others, i have had to spend 000’s of dollars taking her to court for the court to say…let him see his son. I’m told that it will take 3-5 court appearances before they will even consider her paying court and lawyer fees. Her going to never, that’s a laugh. Ex wives have a lot of control in these situations. I know some men that don’t pay just to get their attention. There is nothing we can do.
mecq
January 30th, 2012
7:03 pm
I’m a woman…I raised a male child as his step-mother. I did so without any help from anybody. Since i’m a woman with a woman’s prespective; I raised my son to protect his seed. If he didn’t think that the woman he was about to lay down with was wife/mother material; then he should walk away. I’ve seen my friends take men to the bank and use the child support they recieved to impress their new men/the new men children…etc. As a woma n I would not have had a child if I couldn’t take care of it. I would certainly not want my child’s father incarcerated. If one is incarcerated he can’t work and be productive; so what is the purpose if incarceration for this issue. The mother and father are equally responsible for the well being of the children. I think the laws should be modified to reflect fairness. Birth Control is availible to all. Get some if you don’t want children.
Jaggar
January 30th, 2012
7:04 pm
Amen Buck head Benny and Dean!I am a step-mother with a husband whose ex wife cheated on him and bled him dry. He paid child support on time, we had to have clothes for the children because his ex sent them with nothing, and we bought school supplies, shoes, etc. In the 14 years of paying support, she moved 7 times and lived with 6 different men. In addition, she collected state health insurance, free lunch, and any other benefits she could get by lying to the state and claiming she received no child support. We spend over $!0,000 in the Cobb COunty court system for them to tell us their is nothing they could do. The child support system in Georgia is out dated. Every time the children would come see us, it was sad stories of,”Mom told us you won’t give us money for clothes, mom said you need to pay for new shoes.” There are MANY dead beat moms. I deem a “Dead Beat MOM” as a woman who is living with every Tom, Dick, or Harry she can get, and bad mouthing the dad to ruin the relationship. Georgia needs to have a joint custody with each parent paying for the children’s neccesities on their time with the children. Most women make as much as men now anyway. That would cure everything!
Michael
January 30th, 2012
7:05 pm
@mecq. I get attorney fees on the first trip to court on a contempt. Come on out to Gwinnett county, the judges will take care of you here.
DublDawg
January 30th, 2012
7:06 pm
1. They are going to jail for civil contempt, not for debt. It is not debtor’s prison, and noncompliance with child support orders is not the only reason for which people go to jail in civil contempt.
2. Non-willful contempt is a defense to being incarcerated. In that case, the judge should simply issue a writ of fieri facias (writ of execution) for the back child support. If fathers cared about the legal issues and did their homework prior to the hearing, they would have evidence of inability to pay with them and put up a defense.
3. Based on the SCOTUS decision referenced above, it appears that it is incumbent upon the courts and opposing counsel (if there is any) to advise the responding party that they can go to jail for contempt as a result of the pending motion, but there are defenses.
Corrupt Judicial System
January 30th, 2012
7:06 pm
The Attorney Generals attorney’s stated “It said the men were jailed because of the “consequences of their own poor decision-making.” – What arrogant B@$t@rd$! I personally have been layed off for no reason of my poor decision making – rather it was for corporate greed sending thousands of jobs to India. Thank God I didn’t have children and child support otherwise I’d be in that debtor prison and the attorney general demanding I steal money to pay!
jconservative
January 30th, 2012
7:07 pm
If one is in jail how does one pay child support? Does being in jail pay that much?
Maybe that is an answer to the unemployment problem.
tired mom
January 30th, 2012
7:07 pm
I have NEVER with held my son from seeing his dad. ZERO child support in 6 years. Even if he won’t pay what he is required to pay by law, it would be nice for a hair cut or a new pair of shoes once in a while. I work 2 jobs to make sure our sone has what he needs and some of what he wants. Why should the sperm doner be held to less….he is the one who agreed to the divorce terms.
:)
January 30th, 2012
7:08 pm
I really hate my wife,but I only have ten more years to go. Count down to freedom.
Aquagirl
January 30th, 2012
7:09 pm
There’s always plenty of beer, cigarettes, pot, clubbing on weekends and lottery tickets.
One of two things is true:
A: you knocked up a boozing, gambling pothead who goes clubbing on weekends.
B: you’re a self-absorbed whiner.
Notice there is no option C, where you impregnated a wonderful responsible woman who was tragically possessed by Satan after your breakup.
give me a break
January 30th, 2012
7:10 pm
Jagger that would be a great idea if the non-custodial parent actually cared enough to come and get them. My ex is supposed to have them every other weekend and alternating holidays. He has managed to find something better to do every day except 2 days in the entire year last year. So his support with your method of paying for necessities during their time wouldn’t help in my case. And the judge can’t MAKE him come get his kids.
tired mom
January 30th, 2012
7:10 pm
People are right, if he is in jail he can’t pay ( in theory ) BUT at least in jail….he can’t spend it all on sports, cars and girlfriends.
Mattie Patterson
January 30th, 2012
7:11 pm
They can’t support their children, so you and I get the privilege. They can’t pay a lawyer, so you and I get that privilege as well. They then go out and father more children and the cycle begins again. Let the citizens pay for their vasectomies. End of problem.
Michael
January 30th, 2012
7:12 pm
Putting a dad or mom in jail often causes grandmom to magically produce five or ten thousand dollars to get their 40 year old baby out of the pokey. Been there, done that.
Eric
January 30th, 2012
7:13 pm
I have been paying for seventeen years, my daughter turns eighteen tomorrow!
moms can be deadbeats too
January 30th, 2012
7:14 pm
My ex only had to pay $75 a week for 3 kids. All she did was move out of state and was Scott-free!
Michael
January 30th, 2012
7:14 pm
@Eric. But you have to pay until she graduates high school.
VetDad
January 30th, 2012
7:16 pm
I am a divorced disable vet and i have 3 kids (two daughters and a stepson). My two kids child support stays paid and current. My mom raised me and couldn’t get help from my father with child support. Since i’ve been divorced i have had serious relationships with 2 women that have kids and there fathers didn’t pay childsupport and i was left with helping them out because i cared about them and thier kids (i also considered it paying it forward). There are a lot of deadbeat parents but i think a lot (not all) really can’t afford to pay and you shouldn’t be thrown in jail because you are to poor to pay. What’s next? Lets put all the women in jail thats on welfare because they can’t afford to pay for thier kids and need help from the system. Also, a man don’t have a choice most of the time when he finds out the woman is preganant, therefore its already an unfair situration. If the man don’t have a say then the woman should be left with the burden to pay. On the same note, sometimes the man wants a baby but the woman wants an abortion; once again the man has no say. The law needs to catch up with the times and with reality. I pay my childsupport because i love my kids and its the law and i have the means to pay. But damn, what if i couldn’t afford to pay? What if i would have had the option to pay for an abortion instead? Food for thought…
give me a break
January 30th, 2012
7:17 pm
Child Support Recovery doesn’t just automatically jail a man for not paying either. My ex is about $8000 in arrears. They started taking the current amount out of his paycheck and were only going
to take an additional $80 per month to go toward the arrears. They don’t always make them come up with the entire amount at once. They will try to work out a payment arrangement. Of course that didn’t work either cause he decided to quit his job so he wouldn’t have to pay anything. So now he is in comtempt and if he doesn’t pay the current amount of $400 plus the extra $80 then he would be incarcerated. Not for not paying child support, but for Contempt of Court.
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ will crush the heads of the perverted New World Order integrationist crowd and their devilish black minions
January 30th, 2012
7:19 pm
It doesn’t take much to nip all of this madness in the bud. But first, let me put it in perspective. Prior to integration in the south, African Americans decided to grant legitimacy to external policing authorities etc provided that African American men and women integrate into those agencies etc primarily to protect them from the ways and means of their demonstrable enemies.
But a strange occurrence took place during the process of integration. Immediately after Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated, African Americans entering those agencies etc around the country relinquished their loyalty to the black community and openly joined the positions held by their demonstrable enemies in exchange for money, fame, status, plush jobs, materialism, etc.
Now it’s about time for African American “men” to respond to what has taken place e.g. for self preservation, when black men and women marry or establish personal relationships, each should take an oath expressly forbidding each other from relying on all external policing agencies etc to settle their disputes. And should one party violate that oath, the offending party reserves the right to dissolve all lines of communication with the other, children included.
The five fathers claim in the lawsuit that jailing parents who can’t afford to pay child support creates a modern day debtor’s prison, and wanting Georgia to provide poor defendants with attorneys at child support hearings make sense, if you happen to be white men and women or other ethnicities.
Amen?
Eugene
January 30th, 2012
7:19 pm
The Office of Child Support Services is no regular governmental agency. This agency has many of the same power as Homeland Security. I believe that in addtion to an attorney, there should be sometype formal grievance or appeal process available for non-custodial parent to quickly resolve disputes and change administrative decisions made in error.
Bill Clinton
January 30th, 2012
7:19 pm
Quit sleeping with everyone you meet, and trying to see how many kids you can have, with how many different partners.
jw
January 30th, 2012
7:21 pm
What a person owes in child support and/or whether that person pays is nobody’s business.
.
It is especially not the business of the state and the state’s black-robed bottom feeders.
.
There is a special place waiting for all of the low-lifes that make a living out of the parental conflict/child support industry.
Sheila
January 30th, 2012
7:21 pm
JM, I fully agree an I believe it works both ways, however rare. My son’s father walked out on us for a meth head an I have worked hard to make sure my son lives comfortably. I do not live beyond our means. His father made his bad choices and wants to creep back into our lives. He can creep elsewhere. This is a happy house!
Bucky Kelley
January 30th, 2012
7:23 pm
Has it ever occurred to anyone that I, a taxpayer, pay for the housing of each prisoner. So, does this mean that if a person serves time for not paying child support that he or she is wiped clean of such debt and public assistance is granted to the custodial parent, once again, at my expense? Perhaps both parents need to contribute and the custodial parent needs to scale back in view of the total picture has been destroyed…family. Why should one parent be able to live with no restraints because the other parent is out of the picture. Yes, it is sad for the children but these are the breaks.
4 more to go
January 30th, 2012
7:24 pm
Don’t get married or have kids.
momof2
January 30th, 2012
7:25 pm
Not all parents who are ordered to pay and can’t are deadbeats. I am a ncp who is ordered to pay. However I haven’t been able to pay in over a year. Between a difficult pregnancy and hardly any work in my area, explain to me how my support was to be paid? I am working now and able to pay my cs. Before you people judge NCP you should know the facts and causes of their inability to pay their CS.
Slambusher
January 30th, 2012
7:31 pm
First off this isn’t just about fathers. This is for the NCP.
Secondly with GA system after taxes and support are taken out in some cases people are left with only 32 percent of their income. I think we can all agree that trying to live on a third of ones check is pretty difficult if not impossible.
Lastly how many people out there are like me who have since gained custody of their children but under GA system I am still required to pay child support?
seabeau
January 30th, 2012
7:42 pm
Put these deadbeats out in the fields and farms picking our crops, I bet it won’t take long for them to see the error of their ways.
Mr. Ected
January 30th, 2012
7:44 pm
6 months in a prison work crew, earning $3 an hour. All proceeds go to the custodial parent. Work gets done, deadbeat parent learns it’s easier to pay the support without a ball and chain and warden in your face.
catlady
January 30th, 2012
7:45 pm
I don’t think it happens too often. When I finally got Child support Enforcement to move on my ex (after I paid an attorney and had the judgement ready to be enforced–$20 per week per child, by the way, and he was “behind” by 14,000$) the CSE worked out a “deal” for him to keep him out of jail. His family loaned him $1200 to show good faith (and then were mad at ME) and I still had to stay after CSE constantly, as his boss “forgot” to send in the money repeatedly. It almost wasn’t worth the pain, but my kids needed to know they were “worth” their dad “supporting” them (back then $20 per week didn’t even pay for diapers for the youngest). He finally finished paying the back pay when the youngest was a senior in college! He paid NOTHING toward their college educations, nothing toward their old, beat up cars, Nothing toward graduation or prom expenses. Just the $20 per week plus I kept the health insurance on them and he had to pay the deductibles. However, it was worth it for the sake of my pride–no more doormat!
Look before I leap...
January 30th, 2012
7:53 pm
Maybe before doing the nasty and rushing down the aisle towards wedded bliss, it makes sense to take some time and find out the character of the person you plan to marry. Get to know his/her values, his/her family and his/her friends. Look beyond the nice hair, snazzy sportscar, moves on the dance floor, big boobs, nice clothes, and gold Mastercard.
Dudes, if she is controlling, materialistic and whiny and acts like a spoiled brat now, it ain’t likely gonna get better with age. And she will clean you out when/if the marriage collapses. Ladies, if he is at his credit card max, with shiny rims and overtly proud of his 72″ big screen TV, he is showing off for his buddies, not you. When the rose comes of the romance, he will vanish quicker than a baby’s f#rt in an open air stadium.
Know there is more to living an entire life together and raising a family than material and physical attraction. How does your intended handle life’s ups and downs? Are drugs and alcohol a continual presence in your current relationship? Even after taking the time to consider the above, statistically there is a 1 in 2 chance the marriage will end in divorce. How ya gonna handle that?
Until you are certain, 100% certain, you can make the 18 year commitment to bearing and raising a child – ON YOUR OWN if necessary; guys, you need to wear a condom and ladies, you need to take birth control.
dean
January 30th, 2012
7:56 pm
slambusher, My brother paid cs for 9 years. He got custody 6 years ago but the mother has not paid a dime in cs. cs enforcment says the don’t make the mothers pay.
CDE
January 30th, 2012
7:57 pm
The United States of America is facing the biggest recession since the Depression of the 1930’s. Unemployment is at record highs, foreclosures are putting record numbers into homelessness, food stamp recipients are at an all-time high, food banks are depleted with no food to give, and charity events like the recent free dental services had people lining up for blocks.
Economists and forecaster are predicting things will not change for the foreseeable future. ABC Nightly News reported tonight that gas will reach $4.50 per gallon by this summer and we are seeing record meat prices at the supermarket.One recent report stated that African-American youth have a nearly 50% unemployment rate. We are facing tough, tough times in America.
We need reasonable and fair-minded people and dialogue to work out this situation. Telling a man or woman that they have to pay (ex.) $600 per month who has no income is in my opinion is unreasonable.If you cannot pay it you face jail. Get the money and we don’t care how you get it or you go to jail. You now have a record which makes it even harder to get a job.
I pray and hope that every non-custodial parent can solve their individual cases and that every child is taken care of
May God Bless every child with support and love.
Thanks !!!
dean
January 30th, 2012
8:12 pm
I think a lot of the problem here is when a parent commiting adultry can not provide support then the state awards them custody. If the state made adultry parental unfitness and awarded custody to the parent that was cheated on or placed the child in foster care then a lot of this problem would go away . If they did not award custody and support to the cheating parent then you might would have alot less parents commiting adultry and you would not have the devorce to begin with. secondly when a child is being abused time and time again by the mothers boyfriend then they should prosecute the mother for keeping on dating the child abuser.
Patty
January 30th, 2012
8:14 pm
However what about the fathers that pay their child support and the visitation is set then the Mother says “I don’t care what the court says, you can’t have her” The mother has moved without letting the father know twice.She has been in contempt at least 4 times.The father goes back to the lawyer and tells him he is not getting his visitation etc and the lawyer says give me $600.00 and we will take her back to court. You can take her to small claims to get reimbursed. ( that means nothing when a judgement is in your favor) My question is , WHY after HE insisted the DNA test and paid for it and then started giving her money monthly and was told it made no difference that it was just considered a gift. OK he put himself in the system and has paid his support. ( he wants to take care of his daughter ) Now the mother is getting dumb again and he has to pay hundreds of dollars because she is wrong and is going against the court order.WHY is it HE has to pay? She does not work only is a girl that wants to have fun.
D-Nice
January 30th, 2012
8:21 pm
This whole system is a vicious racket that preys on the fragile state of male and female relationships, (albiet, marriage or significant other) which will inevitably destabilize the family, which will undoubtedly erode society. The majority of these people are only committed to maintaining their personal comforts and have very little regard for institution of marriage, which was only a shallow symbolism of their shallow emotions. The message these warring factions deliver to the children, while trying to inflict as must unrest on each other as possible, will ultimately be the message that the children deliver to the world, which can be summarized by Jay – Z ……”Can I get &%* You! And we why wonder kids today are so disrepectful……if you followed them home, you’d know why. I’m against demanding that other people pay for one’s bad decision. Ladies, in 95% of the cases, you knew the guy was “no good” when met him, friends and family told you the same. He couldn’t pay rent or give you money towards a utility bill, let alone child support. But you’re grown and you’re gonna do what you wanna do….and you said that this is the guy for you! Nine months later, he’s know where to be found……..while that may be his kid, it’s certainly your problem! Brothers, you knew the girl was a “gold digger” when you met her, friends and family told you the same. All she was interested in was the “CASH” to keep her imagine from coming unglued. But you married her or dated her anyway! Once the money was gone, so was she and so were you! You can’t cry foul because her trap closed first and she stuck you with a kid for 18 years. You knew her, you knew the game, you played the game and ….you lost! Pay up!
Doris M
January 30th, 2012
8:32 pm
It makes no sense to me to jail a parent for not paying child support when that parent does not have a job. Why do I, as a taxpayer, have to take on the burden of feeding the jailed parent? Find that delinquent parent a job and take the child support payments out of his check. If the parent has a job, take the money out of his/her pay before they get it.
MotherWhoUnderstands
January 30th, 2012
8:34 pm
It’s about time someone stood up to the Georgia Child Support System. It is an “epidemic”??? There is an epidemic of joblessness in our country right now, but the Child Support System doesn’t care about that. I am a woman who relied on child support from my dad as a child, received child support from my ex-husband for years when we divorced and I am now married to a great man and father who pays a great deal of money each month for his children. I have seen the situation from all angles and Georgia’s system needs to be overhauled. Child Support, legitimization, Custody and Visitation. They should take a look at Florida and Alabama who have adopted better laws in recent years… It’s a mess!
Patty
January 30th, 2012
8:38 pm
Enter your comments here
dontbecruel
January 30th, 2012
8:38 pm
Simple solution: Push the little baby birds out of the nest, and if they fly,….
Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ will crush the heads of the perverted New World Order integrationist crowd and their devilish black minions
January 30th, 2012
8:49 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHB69Q8z8cI&feature=youtu.be
JAG2
January 30th, 2012
8:50 pm
My story sadly is not unusal except for one fact: I was forced to pay child sdupport for years and my two children lived with me.
My wife and I were married for seven years before the children came along and they were 7 and 5 when we divorced in 2000. The judge gave her the kids and ordered me to pay but after two months they came back to me because she wasnt taking them to school ontime and sometimes missing days. After the school called me at work I went to get them and they lived with me until last year.
She was on drugs (I dont drink or smoke and always worked) and was getting out of rehab (all documented and came out in court) and the stupid ass judge gave us joint legal and joint physical custody, meaning that they were supposed to live with her for six months and she was to take them to school…I had asked for full custody.
She never had them for the six months, I had them 10 plus months because of school…and no she did not live in our county, which would have made it a violation for them to attend the good school that I placed them in because she was out of the school district.
The eleven years that my children lived with me I was forced to pay child support and the stupid ass judge and child suport refused to stop it.
I got behind on my payments in 2005 because the IRS came after me for her half of the back taxes that she did not pay, according to our divorce decree. When I went to the IRS office and showed my divorce papers I was told that I was going to be made to pay (taxes, penalties and interest) and if I wanted my money I had to sue her.
They took my money for three years, tax refunds and monthly payments…then back comes child support with arreages and labeling me a deadbeat dad.
After losing my job through a layoff, child support took money out of my unemployment check. My first check was $94 and my electric bill was $124. I was in a child support office when my son called and said Dad, they just cut off the electric. They still refused to stop taking money. I went to court, filed indigent status and the judge said nothing could happen until she came to court. That only happened when I paid a process server out of my unemployment check to serve her.
I had utility disconnection notices and eviction notices, because with unemployment checks I had to save them in order to pay my rent late and the same stupid ass judge refused to stop it. I could not get an attorney because I had no money and could not afford one. I had to represent myself.
Through all of this my son graduated high school and is now in college. He was an A/B honor roll student and my daughter was straightr A. There were times when I fixed food for the three of us but they ate and I didnt. There were times when we had no food. The mother only gave food to them because she got food stamps…I never received any aid. I worked jobs that paid considerably less than what I was making just to keep going but it was rough alot of times.
If the system failed me it will fail anyone…who pays child support when their children live with them? The dumb ass child support workers who think that they are doing God’s will and the stupid ass judges that have no compasion can all go to hell.
I no longer owe child support or the IRS and I still support my children. My son is in college and I help him when he calls me because he is in college doing the right thing and I love him. My daughter is next and she is truly my heart.
But I have no use for their deadbeat mother who would not stop the child support.
Object Lesson
January 30th, 2012
8:53 pm
True Story:
I lived with a woman in the mid-80’s. After 4 years together she decided to go into Air Force and after basic was assigned to a remote post overseas. 14 months passed and she returned on leave. We hooked up and about 3 months later I get a call, she is pregnant and the baby is mine. I fly out to “Bumfargle” for the birth and ask her if she wants to get married. She says no. I make arrangements to pay child support. There is no marriage and no court order. I made those payments without fail, month after month and as my income grew, so did the child support payments. Eventually I moved to California but traveled back East as often as I could, flew him out for summer recess when he got older, took him on trips. There were continual requests from her for additional money for clothes and braces and shoes and what not. I paid, even though by this time she had left the Air Force with a degree and had gotten a job with a good paycheck. By age 12, it was pretty apparent that physically, there was nothing of me in the boy. My then wife suggested I get a paternity test to find out. I was not interested. This was my son and no science class chemistry test was going to change that. My income continued to rise as did the support payments, still no court order. I bought him a car (used) at 16 and paid the insurance. Finally, he became of age and we discussed college. He was not interested. I said fine – sometimes at 18, you don’t know what you want. I told him if/when he decided to go, to let me know. I handed him a check for $5,000 and said as far as the money goes, that was it. I was taking him off my insurance and the monthly payments were stopping. He became incensed as did his mother. In her rage, she stated that she had a paternity test conducted 2 years before and I was not in fact the boy’s biological father.
She later sued the actual father for 18 yrs back child support and won in the initial ruling. I sent a letter to the actual father when I heard that and told him I had made copies of every check written and documented every trip taken and every nickel spent. If he wanted to claim my son as his own, I would destroy the records and he was on his own. If not, I told him I’d hook him up with one of Northwest Florida’s top pit bull attorneys. I never heard back from him. I have have not heard from my son in over a year.
Prisonworld
January 30th, 2012
9:19 pm
There are too many mitigating factors with child support. Yes, if they are yours, work at McDonalds if you have to in order to support them. But, you do have those women who will try to pin a child on a man where it does not belong. This is a hard battle for the man who is fighting his case.
http://www.prisonworldmagazine.com
Chill Will
January 30th, 2012
9:38 pm
I pay way more than the guidelines require voluntarily (more than 6K a month). Why? Because my daughters deserve the best I can provide for them and more importantly its the price of freedom and I’m worth every PENNY. That being said, the system especially in Fulton County which is different than all of the other systems is screwed up, big time.
Shine
January 30th, 2012
9:45 pm
How about deadbeat moms? why aint they threw in the hold? when they burned their bras they earned the handcuffs as i am a firm believer in equal rights. lock the wenches arses up.
Real News
January 30th, 2012
9:48 pm
Jim the courts are bias towards the women. Men are abused in the courts and the system is rigged. Women just have to lie and shred a few tears and the judges give them everything. The courts and the law are broken and needs a overhall. Both parents should take care of their children and that includes finanically.
misterbill
January 30th, 2012
10:14 pm
Reading the comments here was very enlightening. The range of opinion is enormous.
I see that some men (women), may indeed be unable to pay. Others can, but do not. Circumstances change for the paying parent, for the sake of fairness, why can’t the support payments change too.
I was in the situation in the past. There was some extremely hostile feelings on the part of my ex-wife, but she listened to reason and we adjusted payments as the circumstances decided.
It does not make sense to , arbitrarily, put someone in jail because they cannot pay. The emotions on the part of the parties should be bypassed by an impartial referee/arbitrator/counselor. Lives are destroyed by financial circumstances that change and a law that doesn’t. In those cases.”The law sir , is an arse”! , as Dickens Beadle character said.
Chuck
January 30th, 2012
10:22 pm
How can people behind catch up when they are in jail?
Look before I leap...
January 30th, 2012
10:30 pm
Well the unasked question, is it legal or constitutional to incarcerate someone and not guarantee them access to professional counsel per the 5th, 6th and 14th amendmants?
Ol' Timer
January 30th, 2012
10:35 pm
The issue is the father paying his ex and child/children the support — money! I fail to see how putting the father in jail is going to accomplish this aim unless they’re paying more to stamp out car tags that I suspect.
It makes the judge look tough and is probably good fodder for re-election ads, but it’s a nonsolution to a very difficult problem.
Zig Zag
January 30th, 2012
10:42 pm
why come is it 85% of women required to pay….don’t….and that Ga does not go after dead beat moms,at all !!! 85%…fact
td
January 30th, 2012
10:53 pm
Zig Zag
January 30th, 2012
10:42 pm
why come is it 85% of women required to pay….don’t….and that Ga does not go after dead beat moms,at all !!! 85%…fact
Because for a woman to not win custody (and with it all the money) in Georgia would mean that she would have to be in front of a Judge beating the children while smoking crack.
Zig Zag
January 30th, 2012
10:57 pm
I know lots of fathers raising their kids alone…..WITH NO SUPPORT !!……time have changed and the scum bag race is 50/50…congrats girls and wake up all you lazy judges and crooked lawyers
Darryl
January 30th, 2012
10:59 pm
When it is mandatory for two parents to be named and verified BEFORE any welfare subsidies are issued then I will support “deadbeat” parents being put in jail … until then my taxes will just get pi**ed away on someone else problem that is now mine ,and the others that do the right thing .Thanks ,by the way for doing it right. Oh well ,right to birth babies and let someone else pay , that’s buried somewhere in the constitution.
td
January 30th, 2012
11:04 pm
Zig Zag
January 30th, 2012
10:57 pm
I know lots of fathers raising their kids alone
And how many of those went to court and both parents considered fit and the judge stated it was in the best interest of the child for dad to have custody?
michael g.
January 31st, 2012
1:21 am
whether you are a man or a woman……..take care of your kids. they did nothing wrong. there’s no reason to punish them for your dumb*ss mistakes.
BitterEXdemocrackkk
January 31st, 2012
5:05 am
stupid people who have children they cant afford should be put in jail…dead beat moms too.
BitterEXdemocrackkk
January 31st, 2012
5:07 am
I hear stories of the DREADFUL and INHUMAN loiwyers who make millions off the backs of this system. How many filthy loiwyers in atlanta do YOU know? there are PLENTY of them, some even go to area churches and appear upstanding on Sundays!
junbug
January 31st, 2012
5:43 am
There is plenty of work cleaning up government buildings, highways and etc. after they get off from work on their regulay job.
I put in more than eight hours a day all my working life.
Inspector Gadget
January 31st, 2012
5:53 am
It’s easier to say that from many positions. I don’t have kids, but, I question, with this tough of a job market for many, especially the youner generation, and those in that class who are less education, to land a job, that pays enough topay 17%, and then pay your own rent, and then to lock them up indefinitely. It’s gender discrimination in some cases, where in others, I’d probably agree some should be locked up, but not to the extent that it happens on tax payers dollars. JM your concern is well justified, but with little means to do anything about it. I have friends who’s ex’s make more than they do, and the guy is paying the full 23%, and can’t afford an apartment. I think this has to come down to what happens in the divorce, in most cases, instead of stereotyping, poor dad’s as “deadbeat dad’s.”
No equality under the law in Georgia
January 31st, 2012
6:05 am
If someone lies, cheats, steals from a retail business they are arrested and jailed. The owners don’t have to go to civil court and have them served by a slow and expensive sheriff deputy before the police take action. Why not the same treatment for lying, cheating, tenants destroying propery and failing to pay rent? The law encourages them to commit theft by deception and fraud and property destruction to landlords and camp out on their property with impunity. Store front businesses get free immediate justice while landlords get the shaft and are forced to pay for “justice”. Deadbeats are encouraged and aided by state policy and the illegal state law which violates the U.S. Constitution and unfairly favors retail businesses over landlords. Lawyers have totally sold out landlords.
All this patently violates the contracts clause and the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution as well as the meaningless equal protection clause of the Georgia Constitution. Georgia is an outlaw state which flaunts the rule of law for politically correct reasons so courts can extort money from landlords.
The corrupt U.S. Attorney does nothing to enforce the violations of the U.S. Constitution by Georgia which so many brave souls have fought and died defending over the years.
David Edward
January 31st, 2012
7:02 am
Not all non-payers are deadbeats. Jail time does not help struggling fathers succeed, nor does it make them better earners. Encourage success wtih a percentage system rather than a fixed number.
It is time to recognize that fathers are more than just financial insurance for their children. Children deserve to be supported by two contributing parents. Ensure that child support funds are used for children.
Edward Ruffin
January 31st, 2012
7:09 am
Someone is responsible for these children other than the taxpayers. Make that someone pay, or else. Mothers who breed illegimate children should be sterilized after about 2 of them.
catlady
January 31st, 2012
8:10 am
Edward: and fathers as well!
catlady
January 31st, 2012
8:10 am
And the money paid for childbirths should be recouped from the parents, a dollar at a time if necessary
JD
January 31st, 2012
8:12 am
If there were a tax break given to the child support playing parent, then I could see more of them paying. Remember, child support is 100% tax free to the custodial parent and they can spent it however they wish (most of the time – not on the child). Make child support a tax deduction and tax the support as income for the custodial parent and I bet there would be a lot less deadbeat parents.
KSP
January 31st, 2012
8:19 am
Many judges use “child support” in place of “alimony”. I raised two kids and put them through college on a lot less on a lot less than , and I use the turm loosely, “judges” fine some of these fathers. Given fair child support payments, there would be a lot less “dead beat dads”.
ConsequencesAreComing
January 31st, 2012
8:23 am
“Child Support” and “Deadbeat Dads” are noble- and evil-sounding phrases respectively, chosen by those who are marketing certain ideas, which are actually deceptive in nature. Everyone accepts that parents should care for their children, including economically, and nobody likes the idea of a person who does not, thus the “deadbeat” term. This is smokescreen used to keep the general public under control while there is grand larceny occurring against parents and children behind the scenes. Who is committing the larceny? Lawyers and judges — and state governments. How does this work you ask?
First of all, there are many regions of the USA which make “child support” awards which are so outrageously supersized that they are guaranteed to result in default by the fathers. This turns the fathers into instant “deadbeats”. Under the Federal cash bonus rewards system — yes CASH BONUS REWARDS –system the states cash in and collect big federal bonuses when (i) they make larger rather than smaller “child support” awards — no matter what the father’s circumstances, and they get even bigger bonuses when (ii) the father falls behind and the state engages in ruthless “enforcement action”.
This is a dirty system born out of the seed of good intentions, and sold to the public with carefully chosen marketing labels (”child support”, “deadbeat”, etc.) but it has been horribly subverted by greedy and power hungry state government apparatus across most states in the U.S. as well as fee-hungry lawyers and their close friends in the state courts.
What is really going on, and what keeps this dirty system going, is the VERY LARGE scale is the shaking down of fathers and mothers for “legal fees”. The father is hit with an impossible support award — or the threat of one — and of course he is duped into hiring an costly family court lawyer (who is invariably a friend and former and likely future colleague of the “judge”). The father’s lawyer works in partnership with the mother’s lawyer to suck out as many fees as they possibly can from the parents assets, home equity line, and future earnings.
The key to the legal fee sucking operation is that everyone is put at risk for one or more things they fear: loss of their kids, outrageous “child support” award, indentured servitude, and of course, the threat every private lawyer likes to use to scare their male family court clients: jail time.
So what is really going on here? Corrupt state judges feeding people’s assets and future incomes into the pockets of their crony lawyer buddies. Corrupt judges and lawyers brokering people into slavery “orders” for excessive amounts of money.
How do they get away with it? With effective marketing labels, that’s how:
“Child Support” (false label in so many cases — more like designer clothing shopping budget forwomen)
“Deadbeat Dad” (false label again — more like man sold into slavery who has no ability to earn the sharecropper demand)
This is what is really going on America.
The money spent jailing these men is propping up the legal fee billing sprees of private attorneys who chow down at the family court feed trough. Where the least competent, most corrupt and bumbling lawyers in America can feed like they are royalty — and be part of the 1% who are ruining America.
Just a taxpayer
January 31st, 2012
8:25 am
As a father who raised his children, yet who has seen the stupidity of friends who think that their welfare comes before that of their dependents, there is a problem in Georgia. Archaic laws and a legislative system that is irresponsible in its lawmaking needs to be challenged in the judicial system. In Georgia, this seems to be the only way to progress right now. It has become more and more frequent in a variety of issues. “Activist judges” are simply upholding the laws of Georgia and the United States and for the most part are pretty responsible.
give me a break
January 31st, 2012
8:51 am
GaBlue had it dead-on. A lot of guys complain about women who only go for jerks. Well, a lot of men only go for shallow gold-diggers and then bitch and moan when she does what she does best – take the money and run! I have seen this too many times. Stop blaming everyone else for your mistakes, you picked her…
Bob
January 31st, 2012
9:09 am
Current child support is a joke. My ex wife received about $28,000 in welfare benifits and iv’e paiid over $200,000 because of administrative fee and interest. Now you tell me is this childor government support?
Straight Talk
January 31st, 2012
9:29 am
GABlue – You don’t know what you are talking about when you say the custodial parent has to pay a lawyer to get paid child support that it is due. Clearly you have never heard of [or experienced] the draconian bureaucrats at the taxpayer funded Georgia Office of Child Support Enforcement. http://ocse.dhr.georgia.gov/portal/site/DHS-OCSE/
Broken Link
January 31st, 2012
9:39 am
The United States was founded partly because of King George’s debtors prisons. How is this any different? No one should be imprisoned because they owe money. Where does it stop? If you don’t pay Visa or Amex its off to jail with you? Child support is important but the answer to non payment is not prison. The remedy must be civil: judgements, garnishment, asset forfiture etc.
Jimmy The Cricket
January 31st, 2012
9:43 am
Some of y’all are really in need of some long & good, belly-thumping, gut-busting D!CK…
UGA 1999
January 31st, 2012
9:45 am
Here is an idea. Put the deadbeat fathers on a chain gang and force tough labor. Pay them for their time and give the money to the mother and children. CASE SOLVED!
Momof2
January 31st, 2012
10:14 am
The economy is bad for custodial parents also. I was laid off in 2009, worked contract jobs after that and ended up being unemployed half of last year. The needs of my children (1 of which is struggling in elementary and needs tutors and another a senior in high school) did not change in that time. I borrowed, took 401k withdrawals and ran up credit cards. I have no sympathy for parents who can’t pay due to income loss, the needs of the children still have to be met and it requires sacrifice and a willingness to go above and beyond.
3 pages of comments about child support and very few mention the needs of the kids… Selfish and sad.
And for those of you (ncp’s) who pay adequate support, and are concerned that the child’s needs aren’t being met.. Ask the court for custody.
Gerald
January 31st, 2012
12:16 pm
Ignore Aquagirl and those like her. She is spouting the feminist party line: it is either the man’s fault for being a creep, or the man’s fault for marrying a creep, a decision that he made because he was a creep. (It is YOUR FAULT for marrying a woman because you were attracted to her and wanted a trophy for your friends!) Typical feminist nonsense that is based on a hatred of males.
The reason for this propaganda: feminists don’t want women to be held accountable for their own behavior. If the man has to pay regardless, women get to do whatever they want. The men who get hurt in the process: it is their own fault for being heterosexual. (Feminists PRETEND to support gay men. For now anyway.) And the children who get hurt by selfish, irresponsible mothers: SOMEHOW it is REALLY the man’s fault. At the very least, it is SOCIETY’S RESPONSIBILITY.
The sad thing is that feminists so influence public policy.
Kisha
January 31st, 2012
12:27 pm
A good start would be for girls/women to stop spreading their legs without considering the possible consequences. Once they’ve happily allowed themselves to get knocked up and become mommies they somehow become ‘victims’.
And…Georgia’s no-fault divorce laws only make it worse. Either party can just walk away for any reason and stick the other one with the kids.
Gerald
January 31st, 2012
12:33 pm
Momof2:
Oh please. The difference between you and a ncp is that you are not under the threat of going to jail. You can significantly alter your standard of living in response to a reduced income (i.e. sell your house – or allow it to be foreclosed – and rent a cheap apartment or move in with relatives) with no bad consequences. A ncp can’t. He either has to pay or go to jail. If he is in jail, he can’t work or look for work.
CPs have the option of working with the NCPs in order to prevent this from happening by VOLUNTARILY reducing the child support amount, or by asking the judge NOT to issue a warrant so long as the NCP is giving SOME money. THAT would be putting the best interests of the CHILDREN first. But so many CPs allow the NCPs to go to jail despite knowing full well that they can’t pay the child support because they are bitter or indifferent to the NCPs.
Ask the courts for custody? Please. Courts only alter custody arrangements if the CP is criminally neglecting or abusing the child, and even in those cases often the approach is to put the child in foster care, have the CP take a few weeks of counseling and classes, and then return the kid to the CP. For you to throw that out there when you know full well that it is a waste of time shows that you are more interested in bashing your ex – and probably men in general – than solving a real problem. Which exposes you as the hypocrite that you are: you care about yourself and not the kids.
But you keep telling yourself that children somehow benefit from their unemployed or underemployed FATHERS being in jail. You folks are unbelievable. You know full well that LEGITIMATELY indigent single moms and their kids qualify for WIC, food stamps, Section 8, MediCaid, free breakfast and lunch at public schools etc. and you still claim that a guy who is out of work – or doesn’t make enough because minimum wage jobs are all he can find – belongs in jail. It is misandry, plain and simple.
Yes, there are legitimately deadbeat dads who DO belong in jail. But even in those cases, often the women KNEW that they were deadbeats BEFORE having kids with them. These guys have had 4 kids by 4 women, and the women line up to be #5. Are those women held accountable? Nope. They get rewarded with welfare. Any system where the woman is protected no matter her choices but men can be jailed for things beyond their control is wrong. The kids certainly don’t benefit. And despite what feminists claim, most women don’t either.
ConsequencesAreComing
January 31st, 2012
1:00 pm
In the U.S., if you owe taxes to the IRS or a state government, here is what they typically do:
attach (and take) all the money in your bank accounts, investment accounts, and any other assets they can find and take except for your retirement accounts.
How is it fitting that this “special” category of debt, the nobly labeled “child support” cannot be collected in this way?
Easy. Because it is the risk of excessive support awards and jail time which keeps the corrupt legal profession employed as fathers are compelled to pay “protection” money to these gangsters.
Follow the money trail folks. Who profits by this scam? Lawyers, state governments, and a bloated judiciary.
This is absolutely NOT about children’s well being. It is about lawyers’ greed.
Stop and think.
UGA 1999
January 31st, 2012
1:12 pm
Kisha…..so you are saying that it is all the womans fault?
Fred
January 31st, 2012
1:35 pm
@GaBlue and @Aquagirl – Man it must be great to be in a relationship with someone where that relationship never changes or the partner never changes for the bad. Way too many times one partner or the other changes for whatever reason. It could be the dad or the mom, doesn’t matter but the relationship doesn’t work any more. People break up and unfortunately many times there are children involved. Too many times the non-custodial parent gets screwed on support. I understand the need to have standard guidelines but there is too little opportunity to vary when there are true needs. I would bet that for every situation you can cite where there is a true deadbeat parent, I can cite a parent trying their best but due to circumstances beyond their control they are now considered deadbeat.
@dean – there are so many factual errors in your post that I have to conclude that your got really, really bad representation if you had any at all. Try looking up the Ga statues – you might be surprised!
GaBlue
January 31st, 2012
2:01 pm
@Fred,
I didn’t mean to sound unsympathetic. There are GREAT parents out there (who never get the press, attention, or appreciation they deserve) of both genders. There are lousy parents of both genders. There are greedy users and takers of both genders. I’m a divorced mom, and am well aware of the struggles on both sides of the issue.
My point is simply this: 1- If we OWN our mistakes instead of always blaming someone else, going forward will be much smoother and more productive. 2- Let’s make it about the children we brought into this world, even if the other parent doesn’t. It’s not about us, and I’m tired of listening to grown-ups whine.
Momof2
January 31st, 2012
3:35 pm
Gerald:
As a custodial parent, I am definitely under threat if I do not provide for my children… i could lose my children to their father if I’m unable to provide for them and he is or to the “system” if neither of us were able to. For me, knowing that I had brought children into the world and was not providing for them would be worse than going to jail.
Please explain why a NCP can’t alter his lifestyle (sell his home, move in with relatives etc) so that he can pay his support? or are you assuming that all non-financial supporting parents live a minimalist lifestyle? In many situations when a ncp’s income is reduced and they can’t pay the full amount they stop paying support all together and that’s how they end up in situations where they are arrested. You have to be in serious arrears before they start taking serious enforcement action. In my situation, I had not received support in over a year before the ncp was threatened with jail unless he coughed up $1000. And since that $1000 was produced, no additional support has been received in months.
I didn’t state my opinion before on rather a non support paying parent belongs in jail because every situation is different and I choose not to lump all ncp’s in the same basket. I believe that if you are spending time with your children and helping on a regular basis financially, you should not be thrown in jail for lack of support. But if you are a deadbeat dead (meaning you don’t spend time with your kids or help financially on a regular basis) than jail just might be in order just for you to take supporting your children seriously.
You are giving CP’s a lot more control in the situation than we actually have. Once a order is entered, we can not simply make a phone call or send a letter and ask for the support order to be reduced. There are procedures in place for NCP’s to request a reduction.
For the record, I have not bashed my ex in either of my posts..
And is Gerald your real name? You sound just like a deadbeat (see my definition above) dad I know.
ConsequencesAreComing
January 31st, 2012
4:50 pm
One of the consequences of this dirty system, which has stained the lives of so many people, is that the birthrate is plummeting in the U.S. and many men are avoiding marriage and children like the plague. You cannot treat men like junk to be tossed away and then threatened with prison and expect them to wish to participate in such a dirty, rigged game.
It amazes me to read comments by people here who think this system is about women vs. men and children, etc.
It is not about any of that. It is about a profession shaking down families. Once Americans figure that out, and current parents realize why their own children are afraid to give them grandchildren, then maybe the fools who have been manipulated into thinking this is about some silly gender issues will wake the heck up.
This is a business people. You people caught up in it are being used, plain and simple. Those who have been turned into slaves are clear victims of a massive, and illegal human rights abuse, as are all who have been jailed under this oppressive system.
The system continues because a certain highly manipulative profession is making money hand over fist from it.
You people who have hired family court lawyers have been taken for a ride. But you surely also notice how the crony judges like to torture pro se litigants, so maybe you paid the protection money.
Family court is a shake down operation. That’s it and that’s all.
If judges gave a damn about children, they would not let the lawyers loot those children’s parents, now would they?
Right.
Judges are in on it. Almost every family court judge in the U.S. is a former family court lawyer, and will retire from judging and become a family court lawyer again. They are part of the system and have every intention of keeping it going.