Democrats, including the attorney representing President Barack Obama, have made a last-minute decision to boycott the Thursday hearing to consider a “birther” effort to remove Obama from the March 6 presidential primary ballot.
“They can tilt at windmills on their own,” said state Democratic spokesman Eric Gray on Wednesday night.
Last week, in a surprise ruling, a Georgia state administrative judge declined to quash a subpoena directing Obama to attend a hearing Thursday at the Fulton County courthouse on a challenge to strike him from the Georgia ballot this fall on claims he is not a natural born U.S. citizen. Read more background here from my AJC colleague Bill Rankin.
Among tomorrow’s no-shows will be Michael Jablonski, the Atlanta attorney serving as counsel to Obama. He’s written a letter to Secretary of State Brian Kemp, a Republican, asking him to intervene and bring the circus to a halt.
Among those pressing the action is state Rep. Mark Hatfield, R-Waycross. But many ranking Republicans are doing their best to keep their distance.
Here’s the statement just released by Mike Berlon, chairman of the state Democratic party:
“Several lawsuits were recently filed against President Obama questioning whether he is an American citizen in an attempt to remove him from the Georgia primary ballot. Despite the fact that these issues have been thoroughly litigated, a hearing has been scheduled in these cases for Thursday, January 26, 2012. The Democratic Party of Georgia is not a party to any of these lawsuits.
“This afternoon we received a letter from counsel for the President directed to the Georgia Secretary of State asking him to intervene in these lawsuits and bring them to a halt, because it is well established that there is no issue here – a fact validated time and again by courts in this country.
“In the letter, counsel also indicated that they had no interest in continuing to appear or participate further in the litigation and have suspended their involvement.
“We respect the President’s position and urge the Secretary of State to bring this matter to a conclusion. We also believe that each political party has the absolute legal right to determine who should appear on their primary and general election ballots according to their own rules without interference from outside parties.
“In light of these developments the Democratic Party of Georgia has no plans to continue to be involved in these baseless cases. Furthermore the Democratic Party of Georgia will cooperate with the President and his campaign in any way requested to make sure that his name appears on the primary and general election ballots for 2012.”
- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider
For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.
552 comments Add your comment
Mick
January 26th, 2012
8:36 pm
“Mick: Obama’s birth father is completely irrelevant. End of story. He is of course a natural born citizen by virtue of his proven birth on US soil. This matter is settled, ironically with the outcome that Obama is the FIRST and only candidate for president in history to prove he is a NBC.”
Nonsense. The end if story is that since the requirement to be natural born Citizen was a security requirement, to prevent foreign influence, it is IMPOSSIBLE to think that one born British is natural born, eligible to be POTUS. Then you have the holding of Minor v. Happersett that confirms. Look at Federalist #68. A “creature of their own” was the preventative step for prevention of “an improper asendant”, i.e an “improper ancestor”.. “Creature of their own” cannot possibly mean birth to a foreign Citizen father. It all lines up.
Don
January 26th, 2012
10:59 pm
To those of you who consider this boycott to be an attempt to circumvent the law, realize that this issue has already been addressed. It’s racism. If Obama was white, this would never have come up. Too bad this isn’t a criminal case, or Obama may have gotten out under the double-jeopardy clause. Still, if he shows up, what does that do. At this point, they are making a statement: Obama’s proved he is a natural born citizen countless times, so why is this still an issue?