Transportation sales tax effort implodes

Gov. Nathan Deal’s push to move the date of next year’s transportation sales tax vote imploded late Wednesday.

Attached to the end of a notice that Deal had signed House and Senate redistricting plans:

The governor today reached a joint decision with House and Senate leadership to suspend further consideration of legislation to move the date for T-SPLOST referendum.

“We’ve had a healthy debate on the T-SPLOST referendum date here at the Gold Dome,” Deal said. “I’m a supporter of the referendum, and I believe it’s important to job creation and economic development throughout Georgia. I further believe that it is a sound conservative principle to allow as many taxpayers as possible to participate in this important decision. Our time during this special session, however, is precious, and it’s now obvious that it will take too much time to reach a consensus on changing the date. It’s best for taxpayers that we not let this special session drag on. Redistricting was our priority, and we have delivered a great product.”

So in January, we’ll have a full-fledged donnybrook between the two most powerful entities now existing in the Republican party: The state chambers of commerce, and the tea party.

My AJC colleague Aaron Gould Sheinin has more details here.

- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

77 comments Add your comment

Skram30082

August 24th, 2011
8:15 pm

In theory, I support the concept of the T-SPLOST. However, I can’t help but feel like our elected representatives are passing the buck. Rather than passing a bill to raise the gas tax and dedicate the funds from that increase to solving traffic/transit woes, they window-dress their support for the T-SPLOST, all the while planning their “the voters have spoken” speeches when the T-SPLOST is defeated.

Sometimes government needs to drag the people (kicking and screaming) to a solution that they just might appreciate.

We elected these nuts to do a job, and it’s not easy, but that’s what they are there for.

Centrist

August 24th, 2011
8:17 pm

Easy call for me which side I’ll be on since Taxed Enough Already is what those party initials stand for.

Wondering

August 24th, 2011
8:20 pm

Skram: Nailed it on the head. If we want the masses ruling the state, make propositions legal and rename the state California. We have a republic for a reason and these clowns are booting it by kicking the can to a T-SPLOST. When the city dies due to an inability to handle its traffic, they will say it was the public’s will. In the mean time we build rural roads to nowhere with our scarce gas tax money.

Johns Creek Outsider

August 24th, 2011
8:22 pm

I find it HILARIOUS that the Tea Party sent out a press release hailing the compromise when no compromise existed. They were listening soley to the Governor’s Office without any confirmation from House or Senate leaders. Great job, Julianne.

Cherokee

August 24th, 2011
8:22 pm

I agree Skram – we pay these jokers to make tough decisions – they should have approved an increase in the gas tax a long time ago, with proceeds to be used on infrastructure.

bug

August 24th, 2011
8:27 pm

Again you have accomplished POOR reporting. The transportation sales tax as written gives 25% of the tax to the counties to go into their general fund.

Georgia has very poor news reporting along with the rest of the United States.

double

August 24th, 2011
8:34 pm

Is centrist and mugwump the same?

Centrist

August 24th, 2011
8:35 pm

@ bug – that sure makes me feel better. The Transportation – Special Local Option Sales Tax (T-SPLOST) is neither special or all for the bloated boondoggle list, but a hidden .25% County tax increase.

Centrist

August 24th, 2011
8:37 pm

Is double and SPUSA the same?

Atlmom

August 24th, 2011
8:39 pm

Really – with gas taxes this high, there was NO NEED to raise taxes on gas. The gas tax is already a percentage of the gas price, so they have been making out like bandits the last few years.
I totally and completely agree with you skram. We elect these people to LEAD. So lead. Sometimes what we WANT isn’t good for us (I want a train, though. So I don’t have to drive ever again. I know some people around here love their cars, but really, I hate mine. Y’all can drive, I’ll take the train!).

double

August 24th, 2011
8:44 pm

Centrist when you look upon the mountain,what do you see?Then what are your thoughts?

td

August 24th, 2011
8:44 pm

Deal is showing his RINO side again on this issue. The CoC needs to stop trying create special taxes for their interest by putting these issues on the ballot when they can control the outcomes or some of us on the conservative side is going to get POed.

Centrist

August 24th, 2011
8:54 pm

double, be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don’t matter, and those who matter don’t mind.

double

August 24th, 2011
9:01 pm

SPLOST in my opinion is one of most fair tax.As all taxes just never ends.

Michael

August 24th, 2011
9:08 pm

Bet you Jawjans will vote YES on the next SPLOST for a library or some such. You all tax the hell out of yourselves every time a SPLOST is on the ballot yet scream if the politicians want to raise taxes. Since those votes are 100% for SPLOST, I guess that means you are all for taxing others. Feel free to continue to ignore your blatant hypocrisy.

MiltonMan

August 24th, 2011
9:11 pm

I don’t care when they put it on the ballot. I will be voting HELL NO!

shirley

August 24th, 2011
9:24 pm

I agree time is valuable. So is money for infrastrucure improvements whether for transit, water system and bridge repairs valuable. 40 years is way too long to wait for major investment in regional transportation infrastructure. As I learned with the city’s water system the repairs just get more costly the longer you wait. Leadership on tough, costly infrastructure issues is as precious as gold. Clean air is more valuable than gold.

Angus

August 24th, 2011
9:41 pm

OK so the TSPLOST just got dealt a potential, final nail in the coffin.

Anybody working on Plan B yet?

Tondalaya

August 24th, 2011
9:45 pm

“Gov. Nathan Deal’s push to move the date of next year’s transportation sales tax vote…”

Gov. Deal seems to be in a big hurry to get his hands on this sales tax money. I was initially in favor of it, but his overzealousness is giving me second thoughts.

double

August 24th, 2011
9:54 pm

Yep,freeloaders pay splost same as responsible.

Alex

August 24th, 2011
10:11 pm

Georgia entered the 20th century because forward thinking leaders (Ivan Allen among them) made Atlanta the transportation hub of the south. It was a corporate backed, government driven policy that literally paved the way for most of you to come here.
Today’s leaders, supported by an obtuse electorate, are as regressive in their thinking as the bright stars of the last century were progressive.
It is instructive that the buzz word pushers have even turned the word , progressive into a negative.

To the “taxed enough already” guy, if you think Georgia will be prosperous without transportation reform, here’s your sign.

Centrist

August 24th, 2011
10:14 pm

Remember that abortive regular legislative session attempt at rejiggering the tax system? It will return along with TSPLOST rationalization next January.

No doubt a little tax rate cut for big sales tax increases that will be billed revenue neutral with lots of accounting gimmicks. Legislators learned their lesson not to let an independent accounting get ahead of their smoke and mirrors.

SAWB

August 24th, 2011
10:29 pm

I am actually starting to get excited about next year’s elections since we get to vote NO when it comes to tax dollars for corrupt politicians. If you guys want to extend MARTA or build that stupid bohemian boondoggle beltline than get some money back that you have wasted over the last few decades. As to the fact that a NO vote means an end to growth in the Metro Area – well good. Growth makes politicians like Jackson, Young, Franklin, Deal and others rich, but just makes the average person’s life more difficult.

debbie dooley

August 24th, 2011
10:59 pm

Johns Creek Outsider , which MARTA Republican Legislator are you? We had talked to someone that worked in the state senate and they said the deal was done. Also, Gov. Deal had enough confidence to make an official statement there was a done deal. We kinda figure after we sent out our email, school board members would be horrified and call Speaker Ralston’s and Rep. Jan Jones office and ask they kill the deal – which they did. The tea party got exactly what they wanted.. I am horrified that some Republican elected officials want to turn to Obama Democrats for help in passing the largest tax increase in Georgia history…

Centrist

August 24th, 2011
11:05 pm

Just imagine what proposed tax increases would be if the TEA Party wasn’t so successful.

The Ghost of Lester Maddox

August 24th, 2011
11:29 pm

Hmm…interesting how you allow blogging after this story, but NO BLOGGING after John Lewis loses part of Buckhead in the new Cong. Maps.

I am not convince that he lays awake at night worrying about Buckhead, but I AM SURE that he hates losing that Buckhead campaign money that will now go to Gingrey.

Ole Guy

August 25th, 2011
12:17 am

This TSPLOST money, contrary to the apparent thoughts of civic “leaders”, is NOT Monopoly money; it is not intended to fund so-called pet projects, but to be directed toward the “biggest bang for the buck” projects.

Running a rail line between two major points on the map which are currently served by bus routes is nothing short of ludicrous. The current north/south east/west MARTA rail system is probably the smartest thing this region has ever done to address auto traffic conditions, yet, on my two-to-three times a month ride to/from the airport, one continues to see miles upon miles of single-occupant vehicles sitting in stalled congestion. Transferring from train to CCT, one continues to observe the very same apparent aversion to public trans.

Virtually every metro area in the U.S. employs public trans on massive scales, yet this self-annointed “world class city” seems to shun this mode of transportation.

Before we start building more unnecessary rail lines, lets address the major challenges, like “convincing” the public. Build more toll stations. When the public has a choice between public trans and the “convenience” of toll roads and $5.00/gal gas, these idiot hicks just might start making responsible choices.

daddo

August 25th, 2011
12:34 am

Here is a point nobody ever makes. If the corporate and business community wants to raise taxes for transportation on me and you, what are THEY prepared to raise to pay THEIR fair share? What is their part? Crickets.

SAWB

August 25th, 2011
12:52 am

Ole Guy:
What’s up with all this social engineering? I mean why can’t you just leave people alone and let them do what they want instead of trying to force them to do what you think they should? If you want to ride the train fine if I want to drive why in the world should your care?

Leave other people alone to make their own choices and you make yours. If you want to give more money to MARTA than I am sure they will take your check first thing tomorrow morning. Personally I prefer to put my money to other uses and guess what I should be free to do just that.

[...] to AJC Political Insider Share this:PrintEmailMoreDiggStumbleUponRedditTwitterFacebookLike this:LikeBe the first to like [...]

Buckhead Boy

August 25th, 2011
5:20 am

Some of my Republican friends are really disturbed by all of this. They feel betrayed, and that you are forgetting your place. To here them tell it: We have a compact with these people. If we need government to promote our interest, they must pay for that through regressive taxation on themselves. In return, we pander to their prejudiced, Bible-thumping, gun-toting existence. We’re the moneyed class. They can’t really expect us to pay inheritance tax or much in the way of capital gains or corporate tax. Don’t they recognize that we have a duty to our class to get the “progressive” out of income tax? If not, haven’t we told them over and over again that “progressive” and everything else that is bad for us is really evil for them? All that pandering, and now they may not even vote as we expect. Maybe the “southern strategy” isn’t working out too well for us after all.

ByteMe

August 25th, 2011
5:20 am

I am horrified that some Republican elected officials want to turn to Obama Democrats for help

and there’s your sign about how supposedly “non-partisan” the tea freaks are. Just the crazy Republican base with a silly name.

Whitney O'Keeffe

August 25th, 2011
5:43 am

I was ready to vote no on this matter then, last week, heard a talk on the subject. The speaker said that if the vote fails the projects will be done anyhow and funds will come from other taxing sources. Seems to me that the sales tax is the best way since everyone pays rather than a few of us. Let’s take our medicine (eat our peas) and select the lesser of the evils.

debbie dooley

August 25th, 2011
6:08 am

Byteme, I just quoted Rep. Davis with the Black Legislative Caucus. He said the GOP wanted to rely on Obama Democrats to pass T-SPLOST. We have been critical of both Democrats and Republicans equally. One of the tenants of the GOP platform has been no taxes. Gov. Deal campaigned that he would not support tax increases and so did Speaker Ralston. They are both campaigning on behalf of the largest tax increase in Georgia history.

Clinton "Skink" Tyree

August 25th, 2011
7:09 am

There is an intellectually challenged element that thinks all you have to do is cut taxes to spur jobs and economic development; but studies show that businesses tend to locate in areas with there is excellent transportation and educational opportunities — both of which our esteemed politicians tend to disregard as evidenced by their funding decisions.

Support the Tea Party: Racing Toward the Twentieth Century!

Open Mind

August 25th, 2011
7:30 am

Squawking endlessly about the “largest tax increase in Georgia history” is just a buzz word scare tactic by the fringe right. The proper question that any true fiscal conservative should be asking is what do we get as a return on this massive investment? It’s not as if these tax dollars just disappear in a puff of smoke – actual projects will be built that may position Atlanta to compete better in the national and global marketplaces. The verdict is still out on what the return on investment will actually be, so I’m still waiting on more information on what benefits the project list will provide. Anybody who has already made up their mind for or against the tax is doing so for raw ideological reasons, not based on the facts (many of which stilla aren’t available).

Being a fiscal conservative means more than just reflexively opposing all taxes. It means expecting value for your investment, demanding accountability and transparency from our government, and having a willingness to expend money when it’s reasonable to expect that it will pay a suitable dividend in the foreseeable future. Under that definition, the TEA party crowd is not comprised of fiscal conservatives, just self-absorbed nuts prancing around in silly hats, waving cheap flags and trying to boil down extraordinarily complex issues into position statements that will fit on a bumper sticker.

Bill Orvis White

August 25th, 2011
8:00 am

All these SPLOSTS are jobs-killers. Companies and good folks don’t want to pay for stupid boondoggles like these. Let the free market$ and the free market$ say we need more roads to move the vehicles that WE THE PEOPLE choose to operate, pure and simple. I’m working hard with fellow Tea Party activists throughout the fruited plain to STOP these stupid SPLOSTS and other draconian taxe$.
Amen,
Bill

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
8:11 am

@ Open Mind – Many tax payers (investors) want to diversify their portfolios. Their investment advisors (politicians) always push them to “invest” more in the way of taxes, because of their commissions. More and more of these taxpayers are saying they need to self direct some of their investments.

ByteMe

August 25th, 2011
8:19 am

the TEA party crowd is not comprised of fiscal conservatives, just self-absorbed nuts prancing around in silly hats, waving cheap flags and trying to boil down extraordinarily complex issues into position statements that will fit on a bumper sticker.

+10

And, debbie, you can’t fool us with the “we criticize both the same” nonsense. You support Republicans even with their own obvious ethical issues (Graves, Deal). You are the Republican base dressed up with funny hats and dumbed-down-for-the-fools platitudes that mean little when exposed to reality.

Ayn Rand Took Social Security

August 25th, 2011
8:20 am

I don’t understand. Aren’t the Republicans the party who wants the citizens to be responsible for their own decisions? If I screw up, shouldn’t I be the one to pay the price for it? Why should someone else pay for my poor decisions? Isn’t that the main precept of the Republican Party?

Why should I, a taxpayer, pay for someone else’s decision to stay in Atlanta and their need to spend gazillions of dollars building roads to drive to and from work? I moved out of that cesspool 20 years ago for lower pay and a shorter commute. If Atlanta needs new roads to get their citizens to work quicker, let them pay for it with a SPECIAL TAX ON FUEL. Why should the entire state pay for their needs with a sales tax? If I need roads out in the hinderlands, let me pay for it with a SPECIAL TAX ON FUEL that I use. If Atlanta drivers spend more on gas, they must need more roads and need to pay the bulk of the tax. The more fuel you use, the more you pay. Isn’t that one of the main precepts of the Republican Party? Or are you guys just like the Democrats you despise? You know take from everybody else and give to those “other people?” HYPOCRITES!!

Reality Check

August 25th, 2011
8:32 am

The TEA Party has always said they are conservative. What am I missing here? Of course they are going to be for the Republican party 99% percent of the time because the Dems are only represented by entitlement lovers and big government. Tom Graves might have had a failed business but he has not done anything corrupt while working for the people.

Not sure how this is so hard to understand. Maybe the Dems should try a different track.

On a different note, everything I am hearing is the House folded and the Governor and the Senate stood strong. The sad part is the House leadership are a bunch of moderates who haven’t passed a government spending bill or an abortion bill in 10 years. Maybe their members will wake up and elect some conservatives over in the House.

Debbie Dooley

August 25th, 2011
8:38 am

Reality Check , right on!!

Morrus

August 25th, 2011
8:45 am

Skram at 8:15 yesterday did get it right. This state is eat up with incompetence and spineless bureaucrats. People are leaving this state because of it. I know I know, most of you don’t care but you should. If all that is left are the spineless and stupid.

ByteMe

August 25th, 2011
8:48 am

Tom Graves might have had a failed business but he has not done anything corrupt while working for the people.

Reality Check hasn’t checked with Reality lately. Perhaps he thinks that Graves response to the bank wanting their money back from that failed hotel business — which was “they should never have lent it to me in the first place because they knew I couldn’t pay it back” — is the height of ethics on Graves’ part. If so, that would be a sad “Reality”.

The TEA party is not conservatives in any sense I’m aware. They are authoritarians, (small L) libertarians, nut jobs. In other words, the Republican base.

honested

August 25th, 2011
8:50 am

Well this suggests it is time for the TeaPotties to step up to the plate and admit the fallacy in their misguided philosophy.
We need transportation improvements (roads, bridges, light and heavy rail) and our traditional way to pay for it is a FUEL CONSUMPTION TAX.
Raise the tax to a level commensurate with modern reality and current fuel costs (about 2 and 1/2 times it’s current paltry rate) and focus on STATE projects rather than these invented ‘regions’.
This whole project seems to have been nothing but a way to fund the various levels of consultants while new projects were developed. The likelihood that enough of the affected counties would pass the sales tax to really make a difference was always very slim. That the only multi-modal, fully functional public transportation system in the State was completely overlooked when planning this fiasco points to the narrow minded, ‘anti-Atlanta’ bigotry of the current House and Senate majority.

Keep it up, soon we may even be the laughingstock for Alabama.

honested

August 25th, 2011
8:53 am

reality check

Where do you go to check on what you view as reality?

‘The house hasn’t passed a spending bill or an abortion bill in 10 years’.

What’s next in pointless exercises? Do you want them to tackle fugitive slave statutes or do you accept that that issue is settled law?

Alex

August 25th, 2011
8:56 am

WHOA. This is interesting. someone writes that it’s good if Atlanta doesn’t grow because all that does is make politicians and others richer – that the little guy benefits none. Later, the same someone (SAWB) speaks of “social engineering.” So which is it -anti capitalist or anti socialist?

DannyX

August 25th, 2011
8:57 am

“Tom Graves might have had a failed business but he has not done anything corrupt while working for the people.”

The Tea Party is great. They developed a brand new economic system. It creates jobs. Just go to a “We The Peoples Bank” and sign yourself up for a 2 million dollar loan. No pesky government regulations, no collateral, no nothing. Just sign on the dotted line. Then spend, spend, spend and stimulate the economy. After you spend don’t worry about paying the 2 million back. That’s the beauty of the new Tea Party loan, the terms are fantastic.

Hissy Fit

August 25th, 2011
8:58 am

Debbie Dooley: to say that Jan Jones is a MARTA Republican is laughable. Go back and read AJC during the time of the votes. It was Jan that would not budge on the amendment allowing MARTA to ease up on their 50/50 split. It is comments like this that give you no authority what so ever.

Auntie

August 25th, 2011
9:06 am

Measure this syllogism:
If there is no transportation reform (including public transportation to offset the cost of the heavily subsidized automobile), then real estate prices in ALL of Georgia will remain flat or continue to decline for the next 20 to 50 years.
“Oh, dear grandchild, we didn’t know. Back in the early part of the century, society stopped thinking for themselves and a band of opportunists convinced them that living in a governed society was evil and we just believed them and voted against our best interest when it was so obviously wrong to do.” Grandpa, 2030

honested

August 25th, 2011
9:08 am

Auntie,

I want to put that on my office wall!

mike 'hussein' smith

August 25th, 2011
9:10 am

Taxpayers had to bail out the bank that Tom Graves bankrupted. That must have cost us a bundle.

a moderate

August 25th, 2011
9:10 am

“The house hasn’t passed a spending bill or an abortion bill in 10 years’.

Well, Hallelujah! Maybe they realize that right-wing pablums like these are useful for firing up their ill-informed base, but NOT a way to govern. Just a thought…

double

August 25th, 2011
9:14 am

Bow how are splost job killers?Why do companies and good folks not want to pay for these boondoogles.If not paid with splost,then property tax.They will be tax funded,so let the renter,the tourist,visitor help pay.

a moderate

August 25th, 2011
9:14 am

And as for the TEA party peeps on here: “No more taxes” without any consideration of what effect the proposed tax(es) will have is just blind rhetoric. There is a reason that the Chamber and most (sane) Republicans support an improvement to our woefully inadequate transportation situation, and it has everything to do with economic development and jobs, which tend to come to a region that has a desirable quality of life. Maybe check into that before you start spouting nonsense about complex issues that you haven’t taken the time to grasp.
And if you’re mad about Atlanta being so large and don’t want it to grow further (and bring in more of them fer’ners), fine! Delta’s ready when you are…

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
9:15 am

What the partisan Democrats always purposely ignore about the Graves – Rogers venture is that the bank SETTLED. The loan was only backed by the property, any down payment/ up front loan fees, and a signature loan as collateral. The bank foreclosed and was counter-sued for not living up to its terms of refinancing. The bank now owns the collateralized property and whatever else were the terms of their SETTLEMENT. This failed venture did not enrich either Graves or Rogers – they lost money. The partisan Democrats pretend that Graves and Rogers were simply given $200K.

Open Mind

August 25th, 2011
9:16 am

@ Centrist – I’m certainly not saying that every tax is a good tax and that people shouldn’t be entitled to self direct as much of their income as possible. But if a particular tax produces a substantial return on investment for a particular jurisdiction, the Atlanta region, Georgia or the overall country, shouldn’t we as patriotic citizens support those investments? As I said, the verdict is still out on the level of benefits that the regional sales tax will provide. Once all the fact are in, people are certainly entitled to make up their minds regarding whether or not the 1 cent increase is worthwhile or not (using whatever personal criteria they wish, but based on the complete facts, not blind partisan ideology). To prejudge every tax as always “bad” and advocating that keeping as much money in my own wallet is always “good” (cough…Tea Party…cough) is a hopelessly naive, shortsighted and selfish viewpoint that seems to be all too common nowadays.

DannyX

August 25th, 2011
9:21 am

“What the partisan Democrats always purposely ignore about the Graves – Rogers venture is that the bank SETTLED.”

So what! You think that that the whole stinking mess should disappear? LOL! I plan on bringing it up as long as Tom Graves and Chip Rogers are in public office. They may have settled but this is far from over.

a moderate

August 25th, 2011
9:26 am

@Open Mind – Amen!!!

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
9:28 am

@ Open Mind – Have you seen the final list of transportation “investments”? That’s the thing about investments – not everyone agrees which are the ones they wish to purchase. Voters will have up until either next Summer or Fall to decide if they want to buy into this investment. They will be bombarded with all sorts of rationale for and against, so those paying attention will be able to make individual informed decisions.

Some folks here say the list will be shoved down taxpayer’s throats one way or other, so might as well spread the tax base out via a sales tax. I doubt that if the T-SPLOST is turned down that the boondoggle list will survive.

double

August 25th, 2011
9:32 am

Mike it only cost a bundle if you are democrat.Any other party label ,and this was a legitimate up front loan.Seems no one knows all facts,or third party involvement.But will defend the failure.A settlement can cost,and normally does.

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
9:35 am

@ DannyX – No doubt that politicians should be evaluated by the voters based on all things including their personal and business conduct. Some of Graves’ and Rogers’ former supporters will fall off because of this – unless partisan opponents even prior to this issue overplay it. Like falsely claiming it cost taxpayers, or they enriched themselves. Some partisans think that repeating a lie often enough might shade the truth, while others just think those partisans are just liars.

Open Mind

August 25th, 2011
9:49 am

@ Centrist – No, I haven’t seen the final list. In fact, nobody has seen the final list. That’s because what was approved on August 15 was a draft list which will now undergo two months of public comments, with public meetings to be held in every county. This is the time to identify the projects you believe are “boondoggles” and request to members of the roundtable that they replace those projects with ones you believe will create a better return on investment. That’s how the process works…somebody had to come up with a first cut at the list, the public now has the chance to weigh in, and (hopefully) the elected officials will be responsive to that input and produce a better final list in October. Deciding if you’re for or against the list right now is premature.

Nala Retsof

August 25th, 2011
9:50 am

This is a NEW tax and the vast scope of projects approved by the regional round tables virtually assures that the T -SPLOST will be a FOREVER tax. Vote No.
Increasing the fuel tax to fund major projects of statewide impact and allowing local jurisdictions to voluntarily consider a .5% – 1% sales tax for local projects is a much better solution. This formula encourages conservation and allows communities greater control of local projects.
Besides, our elected officials should stand together against the penalties for non-participation included in this legislation.

DannyX

August 25th, 2011
9:58 am

Centrist, Jim posted a few days ago that Graves has 2 potential REPUBLICAN challengers. Kinda throws your partisan whine out the door doesn’t it?

honested

August 25th, 2011
10:09 am

DannyX

Having 2 republican challengers will make for an interesting primary season next year.
A good strong Democrat in the race will help answer the question about what republican mis-leadership has done for the 9th, the 7th, the 6th, the 1st, the 13th, obviously the 10th
coupled with the General Assembly since 2003, the whole state!
When is the promised magic supposed to kick in and how much blatantly crooked behavior should be blindly tolerated until then?

Cyril

August 25th, 2011
10:21 am

@ Bug (Aug. 24 8:27PM) You are incorrect. The sales tax gives back 25% to counties outside of the Atlanta region, but it only gives back 15% in the Atlanta region. Also, they are to use this money (15%) for additional transportation projects.

@ SAWB (Aug. 25 12:52AM) “What’s up with all this social engineering? I mean why can’t you just leave people alone and let them do what they want instead of trying to force them to do what you think they should? If you want to ride the train fine if I want to drive why in the world should your care?”

So you think that the interstate system was not social engineering? It’s a 2-way street (no pun intended) here. The interstate system spawned the sprawling mess that Atlanta is in today, and just because it is more easily hidden with roads don’t think that they are not also heavily subsidized.

Continuing to grow in the same way we have for the last 50 years is not sustainable. For the sake of the argument, don’t even consider ’sustainable’ in the sense of the feel good environmental way. Think of sustainability in the Republican fiscal responsibility sense. Do you think that it is cheaper to provide and maintain roads, sewers, water lines, etc. to 100 families on 50 acres (2 units to the acre per suburban standards) or 100 families on 10 acres (10 units per acre…townhouse density)? God help you if you think the suburban density is cheaper to build out and maintain for society.

I’m not saying we all need to move into high-rises, but we do need to start thinking about what type of growth and fiscally unsustainable patterns we encourage by just adding additional lanes to already congested highways and interstates. (Not to mention that adding 1, 2, or 3 additional lane(s) does not provide the same benefit of the original lane. In other words, because there are driver conflicts, such as people changing lanes, the benefit that you receive from adding 1 additional lane is less than the benefit that you received from adding the first lane. Each lane added provides less benefit than the one added before it. At the width of our interstate system, it has already hit a critical mass of providing little benefit for additional lanes.)

So, I guess if you want to call providing more transit infrastructure to encourage higher densities in the core developed areas social engineering then have it. But just realize that the subject of personal freedom and choice as it relates to where most people live here was previously decided by the interstate system and the social engineering it induced.

Bill Orvis White

August 25th, 2011
12:36 pm

@double

If WE THE PEOPLE let the private sector expand and maintain our roadways, then there would be more job$ and visitors coming to all US cities.

To all those bigots who hate the Tea Party:

The Tea Party has never been nor will EVER BE racist, pure and simple. Get that lie out of your heads NOW!

In Georgia Miss Debbie Dooley is a solid Tea Party activist with solid credentials. She supports rightful Republicans because their ideas are in line with Tea Party principles. Mrs. Dooley cannot work with anyone from the Socialist-Democrat Party of Georgia because each member of that so-called party supports higher taxe$, more government, more regulations, anti-businessism, pro-jobs-killing-environmentalism and an anti-life philosophy. In fact, no sane person can deal with any irrational frantic Socialist-Democrat person.

Amen,
Bill

Alex

August 25th, 2011
1:55 pm

Whether by another Republican, a Democrat, Libertarian or independent, Leaders who cannot live up to their guarantees in business life have no business as my leader and should be shown the door.
Yes, there was a settlement – a settlement between these legislators and the entity that came in to pick up the pieces of the community bank that made the horrendous decision to trust these guarantors.

Ole Guy

August 25th, 2011
8:40 pm

SAWB, I respect your views on the concept of freedom of choice. It is, after all, the cornerstone which (once upon a time) made this Country great. However…accusations of attempts at social engineering aside…we are a Nation of complainers, spoiled in the notion that our freedoms translate into allowing us to do pretty much any damn thing we please.

Ask yourself, SAWB, what one of the…if not THE…biggest problems is with which we must contend on a daily basis…TRAFFIC, CONGESTION, and MORE TRAFFIC. We complain about, we (sometimes) allow it to take control of our behavior, ie road rage, aggressive driving, (fill in the blanks). Yet we do absolutely nothing about it (and this very concept applies to just about any-and-all ills which dog our society). We are content to simply complain and wait for someone else to do something; for someone else to contend with the inconvenience of altering our daily habits for the benefit of the greater good.

Let the politicians worry over social engineering…the ONLY reason we even have politicians is because we, as freedom-loving beings, often-times take our freedoms just a little too carelessly; we often forget that those freedoms DO indeed come with a price tag…the price tag of responsible citizenship.

I should have the freedom to drink all I want, drive as fast as I want, say what I want, do what I want, etc, etc, etc. If I do these things, and I am lucky, I will simply be “reminded”, in a lawful manner, to modulate my wants. But what happens when these “wants”, left unbriddled in my quest to satisfy them, starts to create problems for others…when my overeliance on my personal automobile becomes a part of a bigger problem, such as traffic, congestion, and the anti-social behaviors which emanate from too many people in too small a space?

Are the citizens, of major metropolitan communities, who employ public trans on a routine basis giving up any freedoms? The reality probably lies in the concept that they are actually gaining a freedom, the freedom to behave in a human manner, while those who insist on exercising their freedom to do any damn thing they please are actually relinquishing a modicum of that very same freedom.

Someone (I forget who) once observed, “Give a man enough freedom and he’ll hang himself with it”.

Good luck with your “freedoms”, sir.

Alex

August 25th, 2011
9:05 pm

Well said, ole fellow.

[...] can sure see the Tea Party getting amped up in opposition to the transit referendum. Transportation sales tax effort implodes | Political Insider WABE: Push to move the transportation referendum date fails [...]

Alex

August 26th, 2011
7:41 am

Get the picture: close to 90% of Georgia homes decreased in value in the last quarter. Foreclosures accounted for more than a third of home sales and foreclosures sold on average at a rate 44% lower than other non foreclosure sales. We say we need jobs. Here’s a blurb from the WSJ -
“Union Square’s continued transformation into New York City’s dominant hot spot for tech firms — with a dozen companies signing leases so far this year, including giants like Apple — owes a lot its convenient location and easy access to mass transit.”
Transportation is something that government does BETTER than the private sector. If you believe in capitalism and an expanding economy, you must vote yes to improve transportation. But if you are a nihilist ….

[...] wonder Jim Galloway of the AJC reports that the entire tax is now in jeopardy: So in January, we’ll have a full-fledged donnybrook [...]

[...] the original: Transportation sales tax effort implodes | Political Insider Comments [...]

[...] is the original post: Transportation sales tax effort implodes | Political Insider Related Reading: Little Red Book of Selling: 12.5 Principles of Sales GreatnessSalespeople hate to [...]

iBroke

August 31st, 2011
12:24 pm

Alex

August 26th, 2011
7:41 am

Get the picture: close to 90% of Georgia homes decreased in value in the last quarter. Foreclosures accounted for more than a third of home sales and foreclosures sold on average at a rate 44% lower than other non foreclosure sales. We say we need jobs. Here’s a blurb from the WSJ -
“Union Square’s continued transformation into New York City’s dominant hot spot for tech firms — with a dozen companies signing leases so far this year, including giants like Apple — owes a lot its convenient location and easy access to mass transit.”
Transportation is something that government does BETTER than the private sector. If you believe in capitalism and an expanding economy, you must vote yes to improve transportation. But if you are a nihilist ….

I agree with MORE TRAIN POWER. But MARTA WILL NOT get a PENNY of this “FOREVER TAX” as NALA already stated.

It would be DIFFERENT if, when politicians said something, they’d actually DO WHAT THEY SAID. But they NEVER EVER DO. That’s why Social Security will NOT be around in the future–because politicians SAID it was for Social Security, but then started stealing–I mean borrowing, and not putting back–money from it. That’s why the Hope Scholarship and Pre-K have been cut–I mean “edited” because though the GA LOTTERY was SAID by politicians to be for those things, um, well, that pesky political way of LYING reared it’s ugly head, and politicians everywhere started stealing–again–I meant to say: “borrowing, and NOT putting back money.”

I would L-O-V-E to have a train system that is not only LIKE NYC’s but BETTER (since we could BUILD it in today’s times, we have brilliant universities in GA and the U.S. and abroad that could help come up with an UBER GREEN TRAIN SYSTEM, but it WON’T happen.

MARTA is run by RACIST POOR management–in terms of money. MARTA LOATHES black neighborhoods, and is RUN BY BLACKS! Just like, and I digress, DeKalb County (the southern end or “South DeKalb” is RUN by blacks, but is RACIST against it’s black neighborhoods with the TRUE environmental racism, and the lack of upkeep of ANY roadways, and the bloat of spending on everything BUT the black neighborhoods. That fault lies 100% with the black political DOGS and the RACISTS (again, black voters who vote black even if there is a non-black candidate who had done the job great, and should stay in office…but maybe that’s changed…I don’t know, because no NON-BLACKS ever run for office in South DeKalb unless they are Democrats, and even that is EXCRUCIATINGLY RARE) put them in office…. SORRY for the digress, though, just had to vent this in.

But these ROADS, these EXTRA lanes, I think THE PEOPLE–irregardless of race, income level, gender, political, or religious affiliation think that more lanes are STUPID. Just more lanes to sit in. And we ALL know that the “projects” for the interstates take YEARS and NEVER EVER EVER FINISH!

I HATE that I’ve seen “projects” that have lasted for DECADES–or at least, for TOO MANY YEARS of my life.

The Republicans in this state are the equivalent of the Democrats in the Federal Government.

THEY run out of money–therefore they TAX THE PEOPLE. THE PEOPLE didn’t run out of money from stupid wastes…typically, then the people don’t have enough money, the people can’t spend MORE. But the government leaders, are pimps. They do NONE of the work, but they take a cut. ALLEGEDLY this cut is for protection, like military and police officers. SO um, like, why does the USO have to beg THE PEOPLE to donate calling cards to service men and women so that these true public servants can call home once in a blue moon and say hey to their kids? Where’s the money? Poofed, be-gone somewhere, being wasted (and I have INSIDE KNOWLEDGE OF THAT–straight from ARMY BUDGET folk, but anyway)!

Why do police officers have crappy, ill-equipped NONE bullet-proof, bullet-proof vests? Because, even with a union, they STILL have to get money from government dogs, and those dogs don’t have the money, no matter how much we pay in consumption and/or income taxes because why…they WASTED the money.

Why do people who are “public servants” aka politicians, work part-time, and i mean MICRO part time–how many vacations do they get per year, and HOW long do they actually stay in session–they get Easter Break, Summer Break, Spring Break, what are they, elementary schoolers?

But it seems they aren’t hurting for money, bribes–err–I mean–”lobbying,” etc.

The government is SELF SERVING. And We THE PEOPLE are NOT the government.

We earn our money, or get our money from where ever, and we can’t spend it for them taking a cut! How many times can ONE DOLLAR be taxed? Aside from true values of money through talk of inflation, how much is the average worker’s dollar worth? It’s earned, at work. Then taxed once by the Federal Government, Once by the State Government, then you go to Wal-Mart or McDonalds and it’s taxed 3%-7% more, THEN, Wal-Mart and McDonalds pay tax on that dollar in the form of THEIR employee’s salaries, and THEN they pay their business taxes like, maybe before April 15th of every year, like the average person pays their income taxes.

AND THEY (the government politicians) can’t find any money?????? They earn, basically, stealth interest on 1 dollar, like, I don’t know HOW MANY TIMES, before that dollar, itself, goes TO THEM after April 15th of every year.

Somehow I THINK that there is a correlation between $8.00 Coca-Cola soda pop coming out of vending machines in Washington, D.C., uneccessarilly large security details (WITHIN SECURED BUILDINGS) in Washington, D.C., and SUBSIDIZED–I guess that’s the right word–FREE (for the politician) airline tickets for what would have been a 2 hour or less drive via vehicle for GA politicians when they are in session going to and from Atlanta to Macon.

This is NOT a rant, but rather a late-dialogue on this issue of taxation, and NO representation. NYC is different. They have an infrastructure problem, they SOLVE IT–so sayith a Brooklynite turned Georgian. But here in GA, we have an infrastructure problem, traffic congestion problem, school problem, pollution problem, etc…THEY say, “give us this or that in the form of SPLOSTs, if you want this improved.” And WE, THE responsible, forward-thinking, PEOPLE say, “ok, this is true. We DO need to fix those levies (New Orleans, Vermont or other New England), and then, we get sinkholes that come seemingly out of no where, flooding–that we later blame on Katrina–but in reality, wouldn’t have happened had the politicians USED THE LEVY MONEY TO MAINTAIN THE LEVIES, but yeah. So like, where’s the money?

Like Keith Richards after a concert performance–WASTED!

I respect, and actually LOVE your comment Alex, and Nala’s both to an extent, and others’ comments in partial, but I think that there’s a BIG FAT factor that we are NOT factoring in here that changes EVERYTHING:

Politicians PROPOSE (doing x-y-z with OUR money–tourists and locals). WE THE PEOPLE vote YAY. Then decades later, they STILL are taking OUT monies, but we have NO C-H-A-N-G-E, or LITTLE C-H-A-N-G-E!!!! And somehow, they need MORE money. And when you ask them, well, what did you do with the old money, they redirect us to their talking points via political talking heads either on Cable News, Free-T.V. local & national News, or via the RADIO.

Parties mean NOTHING. Politicians are the most self-serving public “servants,” EVER, and they FAIL EPICALLY, with spending OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY. Because that’s all the money they have–OTHER PEOPLE’S money. And all we get, if our “servants” are so generous are “public comment periods” and a paltry vote.

And even when WE THE PEOPLE vote to do the right thing. THEY the politicians–I mean LIARS–do the WRONG THINGS and just turn the other cheek to blame the other party for why they couldn’t do what they said they where gonna do.

SAME STORY.

So yeah, I wish NO argument here, about the gov’t does this better or the private sector does that better, because I believe that self-interest serves SELF, and is a poor servant to ANYONE OTHER. That said though, if Apple needed to build a building with share-holder’s money, they’d build it, and turn a profit, or their shareholders would DUMP their shares, and that would mean Apple would lose funding money. In GA State government, the GA (largely ALWAYS been a Republican run state–even when Democrats where in the more key positions) State Government says, we need to expand this parking lot or that parking lot–OOPS, i meant to say Interstate–and then like, decades later, I see the SAME construction trucks. HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO TURN THAT PROFIT, or to start reaping the rewards for WE THE PEOPLE? That’s NOT efficient. But to be clear, I don’t like government nor private sector because evil is as evil does when it comes to Man trying to run ANYTHING. The only edge I SOMETIMES can give to private sector, at least they know they DOn’t get paid unless they APPEAR to do something (self-interest). The government gets paid, because they just hold folk at gunpoint and threaten them with tax evasion or theft if they don’t pay their taxes.

ADIOS!