Transportation sales tax effort implodes

Gov. Nathan Deal’s push to move the date of next year’s transportation sales tax vote imploded late Wednesday.

Attached to the end of a notice that Deal had signed House and Senate redistricting plans:

The governor today reached a joint decision with House and Senate leadership to suspend further consideration of legislation to move the date for T-SPLOST referendum.

“We’ve had a healthy debate on the T-SPLOST referendum date here at the Gold Dome,” Deal said. “I’m a supporter of the referendum, and I believe it’s important to job creation and economic development throughout Georgia. I further believe that it is a sound conservative principle to allow as many taxpayers as possible to participate in this important decision. Our time during this special session, however, is precious, and it’s now obvious that it will take too much time to reach a consensus on changing the date. It’s best for taxpayers that we not let this special session drag on. Redistricting was our priority, and we have delivered a great product.”

So in January, we’ll have a full-fledged donnybrook between the two most powerful entities now existing in the Republican party: The state chambers of commerce, and the tea party.

My AJC colleague Aaron Gould Sheinin has more details here.

- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

77 comments Add your comment

honested

August 25th, 2011
9:08 am

Auntie,

I want to put that on my office wall!

mike 'hussein' smith

August 25th, 2011
9:10 am

Taxpayers had to bail out the bank that Tom Graves bankrupted. That must have cost us a bundle.

a moderate

August 25th, 2011
9:10 am

“The house hasn’t passed a spending bill or an abortion bill in 10 years’.

Well, Hallelujah! Maybe they realize that right-wing pablums like these are useful for firing up their ill-informed base, but NOT a way to govern. Just a thought…

double

August 25th, 2011
9:14 am

Bow how are splost job killers?Why do companies and good folks not want to pay for these boondoogles.If not paid with splost,then property tax.They will be tax funded,so let the renter,the tourist,visitor help pay.

a moderate

August 25th, 2011
9:14 am

And as for the TEA party peeps on here: “No more taxes” without any consideration of what effect the proposed tax(es) will have is just blind rhetoric. There is a reason that the Chamber and most (sane) Republicans support an improvement to our woefully inadequate transportation situation, and it has everything to do with economic development and jobs, which tend to come to a region that has a desirable quality of life. Maybe check into that before you start spouting nonsense about complex issues that you haven’t taken the time to grasp.
And if you’re mad about Atlanta being so large and don’t want it to grow further (and bring in more of them fer’ners), fine! Delta’s ready when you are…

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
9:15 am

What the partisan Democrats always purposely ignore about the Graves – Rogers venture is that the bank SETTLED. The loan was only backed by the property, any down payment/ up front loan fees, and a signature loan as collateral. The bank foreclosed and was counter-sued for not living up to its terms of refinancing. The bank now owns the collateralized property and whatever else were the terms of their SETTLEMENT. This failed venture did not enrich either Graves or Rogers – they lost money. The partisan Democrats pretend that Graves and Rogers were simply given $200K.

Open Mind

August 25th, 2011
9:16 am

@ Centrist – I’m certainly not saying that every tax is a good tax and that people shouldn’t be entitled to self direct as much of their income as possible. But if a particular tax produces a substantial return on investment for a particular jurisdiction, the Atlanta region, Georgia or the overall country, shouldn’t we as patriotic citizens support those investments? As I said, the verdict is still out on the level of benefits that the regional sales tax will provide. Once all the fact are in, people are certainly entitled to make up their minds regarding whether or not the 1 cent increase is worthwhile or not (using whatever personal criteria they wish, but based on the complete facts, not blind partisan ideology). To prejudge every tax as always “bad” and advocating that keeping as much money in my own wallet is always “good” (cough…Tea Party…cough) is a hopelessly naive, shortsighted and selfish viewpoint that seems to be all too common nowadays.

DannyX

August 25th, 2011
9:21 am

“What the partisan Democrats always purposely ignore about the Graves – Rogers venture is that the bank SETTLED.”

So what! You think that that the whole stinking mess should disappear? LOL! I plan on bringing it up as long as Tom Graves and Chip Rogers are in public office. They may have settled but this is far from over.

a moderate

August 25th, 2011
9:26 am

@Open Mind – Amen!!!

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
9:28 am

@ Open Mind – Have you seen the final list of transportation “investments”? That’s the thing about investments – not everyone agrees which are the ones they wish to purchase. Voters will have up until either next Summer or Fall to decide if they want to buy into this investment. They will be bombarded with all sorts of rationale for and against, so those paying attention will be able to make individual informed decisions.

Some folks here say the list will be shoved down taxpayer’s throats one way or other, so might as well spread the tax base out via a sales tax. I doubt that if the T-SPLOST is turned down that the boondoggle list will survive.

double

August 25th, 2011
9:32 am

Mike it only cost a bundle if you are democrat.Any other party label ,and this was a legitimate up front loan.Seems no one knows all facts,or third party involvement.But will defend the failure.A settlement can cost,and normally does.

Centrist

August 25th, 2011
9:35 am

@ DannyX – No doubt that politicians should be evaluated by the voters based on all things including their personal and business conduct. Some of Graves’ and Rogers’ former supporters will fall off because of this – unless partisan opponents even prior to this issue overplay it. Like falsely claiming it cost taxpayers, or they enriched themselves. Some partisans think that repeating a lie often enough might shade the truth, while others just think those partisans are just liars.

Open Mind

August 25th, 2011
9:49 am

@ Centrist – No, I haven’t seen the final list. In fact, nobody has seen the final list. That’s because what was approved on August 15 was a draft list which will now undergo two months of public comments, with public meetings to be held in every county. This is the time to identify the projects you believe are “boondoggles” and request to members of the roundtable that they replace those projects with ones you believe will create a better return on investment. That’s how the process works…somebody had to come up with a first cut at the list, the public now has the chance to weigh in, and (hopefully) the elected officials will be responsive to that input and produce a better final list in October. Deciding if you’re for or against the list right now is premature.

Nala Retsof

August 25th, 2011
9:50 am

This is a NEW tax and the vast scope of projects approved by the regional round tables virtually assures that the T -SPLOST will be a FOREVER tax. Vote No.
Increasing the fuel tax to fund major projects of statewide impact and allowing local jurisdictions to voluntarily consider a .5% – 1% sales tax for local projects is a much better solution. This formula encourages conservation and allows communities greater control of local projects.
Besides, our elected officials should stand together against the penalties for non-participation included in this legislation.

DannyX

August 25th, 2011
9:58 am

Centrist, Jim posted a few days ago that Graves has 2 potential REPUBLICAN challengers. Kinda throws your partisan whine out the door doesn’t it?

honested

August 25th, 2011
10:09 am

DannyX

Having 2 republican challengers will make for an interesting primary season next year.
A good strong Democrat in the race will help answer the question about what republican mis-leadership has done for the 9th, the 7th, the 6th, the 1st, the 13th, obviously the 10th
coupled with the General Assembly since 2003, the whole state!
When is the promised magic supposed to kick in and how much blatantly crooked behavior should be blindly tolerated until then?

Cyril

August 25th, 2011
10:21 am

@ Bug (Aug. 24 8:27PM) You are incorrect. The sales tax gives back 25% to counties outside of the Atlanta region, but it only gives back 15% in the Atlanta region. Also, they are to use this money (15%) for additional transportation projects.

@ SAWB (Aug. 25 12:52AM) “What’s up with all this social engineering? I mean why can’t you just leave people alone and let them do what they want instead of trying to force them to do what you think they should? If you want to ride the train fine if I want to drive why in the world should your care?”

So you think that the interstate system was not social engineering? It’s a 2-way street (no pun intended) here. The interstate system spawned the sprawling mess that Atlanta is in today, and just because it is more easily hidden with roads don’t think that they are not also heavily subsidized.

Continuing to grow in the same way we have for the last 50 years is not sustainable. For the sake of the argument, don’t even consider ’sustainable’ in the sense of the feel good environmental way. Think of sustainability in the Republican fiscal responsibility sense. Do you think that it is cheaper to provide and maintain roads, sewers, water lines, etc. to 100 families on 50 acres (2 units to the acre per suburban standards) or 100 families on 10 acres (10 units per acre…townhouse density)? God help you if you think the suburban density is cheaper to build out and maintain for society.

I’m not saying we all need to move into high-rises, but we do need to start thinking about what type of growth and fiscally unsustainable patterns we encourage by just adding additional lanes to already congested highways and interstates. (Not to mention that adding 1, 2, or 3 additional lane(s) does not provide the same benefit of the original lane. In other words, because there are driver conflicts, such as people changing lanes, the benefit that you receive from adding 1 additional lane is less than the benefit that you received from adding the first lane. Each lane added provides less benefit than the one added before it. At the width of our interstate system, it has already hit a critical mass of providing little benefit for additional lanes.)

So, I guess if you want to call providing more transit infrastructure to encourage higher densities in the core developed areas social engineering then have it. But just realize that the subject of personal freedom and choice as it relates to where most people live here was previously decided by the interstate system and the social engineering it induced.

Bill Orvis White

August 25th, 2011
12:36 pm

@double

If WE THE PEOPLE let the private sector expand and maintain our roadways, then there would be more job$ and visitors coming to all US cities.

To all those bigots who hate the Tea Party:

The Tea Party has never been nor will EVER BE racist, pure and simple. Get that lie out of your heads NOW!

In Georgia Miss Debbie Dooley is a solid Tea Party activist with solid credentials. She supports rightful Republicans because their ideas are in line with Tea Party principles. Mrs. Dooley cannot work with anyone from the Socialist-Democrat Party of Georgia because each member of that so-called party supports higher taxe$, more government, more regulations, anti-businessism, pro-jobs-killing-environmentalism and an anti-life philosophy. In fact, no sane person can deal with any irrational frantic Socialist-Democrat person.

Amen,
Bill

Alex

August 25th, 2011
1:55 pm

Whether by another Republican, a Democrat, Libertarian or independent, Leaders who cannot live up to their guarantees in business life have no business as my leader and should be shown the door.
Yes, there was a settlement – a settlement between these legislators and the entity that came in to pick up the pieces of the community bank that made the horrendous decision to trust these guarantors.

Ole Guy

August 25th, 2011
8:40 pm

SAWB, I respect your views on the concept of freedom of choice. It is, after all, the cornerstone which (once upon a time) made this Country great. However…accusations of attempts at social engineering aside…we are a Nation of complainers, spoiled in the notion that our freedoms translate into allowing us to do pretty much any damn thing we please.

Ask yourself, SAWB, what one of the…if not THE…biggest problems is with which we must contend on a daily basis…TRAFFIC, CONGESTION, and MORE TRAFFIC. We complain about, we (sometimes) allow it to take control of our behavior, ie road rage, aggressive driving, (fill in the blanks). Yet we do absolutely nothing about it (and this very concept applies to just about any-and-all ills which dog our society). We are content to simply complain and wait for someone else to do something; for someone else to contend with the inconvenience of altering our daily habits for the benefit of the greater good.

Let the politicians worry over social engineering…the ONLY reason we even have politicians is because we, as freedom-loving beings, often-times take our freedoms just a little too carelessly; we often forget that those freedoms DO indeed come with a price tag…the price tag of responsible citizenship.

I should have the freedom to drink all I want, drive as fast as I want, say what I want, do what I want, etc, etc, etc. If I do these things, and I am lucky, I will simply be “reminded”, in a lawful manner, to modulate my wants. But what happens when these “wants”, left unbriddled in my quest to satisfy them, starts to create problems for others…when my overeliance on my personal automobile becomes a part of a bigger problem, such as traffic, congestion, and the anti-social behaviors which emanate from too many people in too small a space?

Are the citizens, of major metropolitan communities, who employ public trans on a routine basis giving up any freedoms? The reality probably lies in the concept that they are actually gaining a freedom, the freedom to behave in a human manner, while those who insist on exercising their freedom to do any damn thing they please are actually relinquishing a modicum of that very same freedom.

Someone (I forget who) once observed, “Give a man enough freedom and he’ll hang himself with it”.

Good luck with your “freedoms”, sir.

Alex

August 25th, 2011
9:05 pm

Well said, ole fellow.

[...] can sure see the Tea Party getting amped up in opposition to the transit referendum. Transportation sales tax effort implodes | Political Insider WABE: Push to move the transportation referendum date fails [...]

Alex

August 26th, 2011
7:41 am

Get the picture: close to 90% of Georgia homes decreased in value in the last quarter. Foreclosures accounted for more than a third of home sales and foreclosures sold on average at a rate 44% lower than other non foreclosure sales. We say we need jobs. Here’s a blurb from the WSJ -
“Union Square’s continued transformation into New York City’s dominant hot spot for tech firms — with a dozen companies signing leases so far this year, including giants like Apple — owes a lot its convenient location and easy access to mass transit.”
Transportation is something that government does BETTER than the private sector. If you believe in capitalism and an expanding economy, you must vote yes to improve transportation. But if you are a nihilist ….

[...] wonder Jim Galloway of the AJC reports that the entire tax is now in jeopardy: So in January, we’ll have a full-fledged donnybrook [...]

[...] the original: Transportation sales tax effort implodes | Political Insider Comments [...]

[...] is the original post: Transportation sales tax effort implodes | Political Insider Related Reading: Little Red Book of Selling: 12.5 Principles of Sales GreatnessSalespeople hate to [...]

iBroke

August 31st, 2011
12:24 pm

Alex

August 26th, 2011
7:41 am

Get the picture: close to 90% of Georgia homes decreased in value in the last quarter. Foreclosures accounted for more than a third of home sales and foreclosures sold on average at a rate 44% lower than other non foreclosure sales. We say we need jobs. Here’s a blurb from the WSJ -
“Union Square’s continued transformation into New York City’s dominant hot spot for tech firms — with a dozen companies signing leases so far this year, including giants like Apple — owes a lot its convenient location and easy access to mass transit.”
Transportation is something that government does BETTER than the private sector. If you believe in capitalism and an expanding economy, you must vote yes to improve transportation. But if you are a nihilist ….

I agree with MORE TRAIN POWER. But MARTA WILL NOT get a PENNY of this “FOREVER TAX” as NALA already stated.

It would be DIFFERENT if, when politicians said something, they’d actually DO WHAT THEY SAID. But they NEVER EVER DO. That’s why Social Security will NOT be around in the future–because politicians SAID it was for Social Security, but then started stealing–I mean borrowing, and not putting back–money from it. That’s why the Hope Scholarship and Pre-K have been cut–I mean “edited” because though the GA LOTTERY was SAID by politicians to be for those things, um, well, that pesky political way of LYING reared it’s ugly head, and politicians everywhere started stealing–again–I meant to say: “borrowing, and NOT putting back money.”

I would L-O-V-E to have a train system that is not only LIKE NYC’s but BETTER (since we could BUILD it in today’s times, we have brilliant universities in GA and the U.S. and abroad that could help come up with an UBER GREEN TRAIN SYSTEM, but it WON’T happen.

MARTA is run by RACIST POOR management–in terms of money. MARTA LOATHES black neighborhoods, and is RUN BY BLACKS! Just like, and I digress, DeKalb County (the southern end or “South DeKalb” is RUN by blacks, but is RACIST against it’s black neighborhoods with the TRUE environmental racism, and the lack of upkeep of ANY roadways, and the bloat of spending on everything BUT the black neighborhoods. That fault lies 100% with the black political DOGS and the RACISTS (again, black voters who vote black even if there is a non-black candidate who had done the job great, and should stay in office…but maybe that’s changed…I don’t know, because no NON-BLACKS ever run for office in South DeKalb unless they are Democrats, and even that is EXCRUCIATINGLY RARE) put them in office…. SORRY for the digress, though, just had to vent this in.

But these ROADS, these EXTRA lanes, I think THE PEOPLE–irregardless of race, income level, gender, political, or religious affiliation think that more lanes are STUPID. Just more lanes to sit in. And we ALL know that the “projects” for the interstates take YEARS and NEVER EVER EVER FINISH!

I HATE that I’ve seen “projects” that have lasted for DECADES–or at least, for TOO MANY YEARS of my life.

The Republicans in this state are the equivalent of the Democrats in the Federal Government.

THEY run out of money–therefore they TAX THE PEOPLE. THE PEOPLE didn’t run out of money from stupid wastes…typically, then the people don’t have enough money, the people can’t spend MORE. But the government leaders, are pimps. They do NONE of the work, but they take a cut. ALLEGEDLY this cut is for protection, like military and police officers. SO um, like, why does the USO have to beg THE PEOPLE to donate calling cards to service men and women so that these true public servants can call home once in a blue moon and say hey to their kids? Where’s the money? Poofed, be-gone somewhere, being wasted (and I have INSIDE KNOWLEDGE OF THAT–straight from ARMY BUDGET folk, but anyway)!

Why do police officers have crappy, ill-equipped NONE bullet-proof, bullet-proof vests? Because, even with a union, they STILL have to get money from government dogs, and those dogs don’t have the money, no matter how much we pay in consumption and/or income taxes because why…they WASTED the money.

Why do people who are “public servants” aka politicians, work part-time, and i mean MICRO part time–how many vacations do they get per year, and HOW long do they actually stay in session–they get Easter Break, Summer Break, Spring Break, what are they, elementary schoolers?

But it seems they aren’t hurting for money, bribes–err–I mean–”lobbying,” etc.

The government is SELF SERVING. And We THE PEOPLE are NOT the government.

We earn our money, or get our money from where ever, and we can’t spend it for them taking a cut! How many times can ONE DOLLAR be taxed? Aside from true values of money through talk of inflation, how much is the average worker’s dollar worth? It’s earned, at work. Then taxed once by the Federal Government, Once by the State Government, then you go to Wal-Mart or McDonalds and it’s taxed 3%-7% more, THEN, Wal-Mart and McDonalds pay tax on that dollar in the form of THEIR employee’s salaries, and THEN they pay their business taxes like, maybe before April 15th of every year, like the average person pays their income taxes.

AND THEY (the government politicians) can’t find any money?????? They earn, basically, stealth interest on 1 dollar, like, I don’t know HOW MANY TIMES, before that dollar, itself, goes TO THEM after April 15th of every year.

Somehow I THINK that there is a correlation between $8.00 Coca-Cola soda pop coming out of vending machines in Washington, D.C., uneccessarilly large security details (WITHIN SECURED BUILDINGS) in Washington, D.C., and SUBSIDIZED–I guess that’s the right word–FREE (for the politician) airline tickets for what would have been a 2 hour or less drive via vehicle for GA politicians when they are in session going to and from Atlanta to Macon.

This is NOT a rant, but rather a late-dialogue on this issue of taxation, and NO representation. NYC is different. They have an infrastructure problem, they SOLVE IT–so sayith a Brooklynite turned Georgian. But here in GA, we have an infrastructure problem, traffic congestion problem, school problem, pollution problem, etc…THEY say, “give us this or that in the form of SPLOSTs, if you want this improved.” And WE, THE responsible, forward-thinking, PEOPLE say, “ok, this is true. We DO need to fix those levies (New Orleans, Vermont or other New England), and then, we get sinkholes that come seemingly out of no where, flooding–that we later blame on Katrina–but in reality, wouldn’t have happened had the politicians USED THE LEVY MONEY TO MAINTAIN THE LEVIES, but yeah. So like, where’s the money?

Like Keith Richards after a concert performance–WASTED!

I respect, and actually LOVE your comment Alex, and Nala’s both to an extent, and others’ comments in partial, but I think that there’s a BIG FAT factor that we are NOT factoring in here that changes EVERYTHING:

Politicians PROPOSE (doing x-y-z with OUR money–tourists and locals). WE THE PEOPLE vote YAY. Then decades later, they STILL are taking OUT monies, but we have NO C-H-A-N-G-E, or LITTLE C-H-A-N-G-E!!!! And somehow, they need MORE money. And when you ask them, well, what did you do with the old money, they redirect us to their talking points via political talking heads either on Cable News, Free-T.V. local & national News, or via the RADIO.

Parties mean NOTHING. Politicians are the most self-serving public “servants,” EVER, and they FAIL EPICALLY, with spending OTHER PEOPLE’S MONEY. Because that’s all the money they have–OTHER PEOPLE’S money. And all we get, if our “servants” are so generous are “public comment periods” and a paltry vote.

And even when WE THE PEOPLE vote to do the right thing. THEY the politicians–I mean LIARS–do the WRONG THINGS and just turn the other cheek to blame the other party for why they couldn’t do what they said they where gonna do.

SAME STORY.

So yeah, I wish NO argument here, about the gov’t does this better or the private sector does that better, because I believe that self-interest serves SELF, and is a poor servant to ANYONE OTHER. That said though, if Apple needed to build a building with share-holder’s money, they’d build it, and turn a profit, or their shareholders would DUMP their shares, and that would mean Apple would lose funding money. In GA State government, the GA (largely ALWAYS been a Republican run state–even when Democrats where in the more key positions) State Government says, we need to expand this parking lot or that parking lot–OOPS, i meant to say Interstate–and then like, decades later, I see the SAME construction trucks. HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE TO TURN THAT PROFIT, or to start reaping the rewards for WE THE PEOPLE? That’s NOT efficient. But to be clear, I don’t like government nor private sector because evil is as evil does when it comes to Man trying to run ANYTHING. The only edge I SOMETIMES can give to private sector, at least they know they DOn’t get paid unless they APPEAR to do something (self-interest). The government gets paid, because they just hold folk at gunpoint and threaten them with tax evasion or theft if they don’t pay their taxes.

ADIOS!