Your morning jolt: Is Fox News biased against certain Republicans?

During the state GOP convention in Macon last weekend, a number of Republicans complained of bias in the national media.

Which normally would be as newsworthy as declaring water to be wet. Except that the complainers were Herman Cain supporters, and the object of their discontent was Fox News.

Herman Cain speaks to Georgia Republicans in Macon. AP/The Macon Telegraph, Grant Blankenship

Herman Cain speaks to Georgia Republicans in Macon. AP/The Macon Telegraph, Grant Blankenship

The cable TV network was ignoring the Cain campaign in favor of old friends who served as professional commentators, they charged.

This spring, Fox News suspended, then terminated, its contracts with former U.S. House speaker Newt Gingrich and former U.S. senator Rick Santorum, both of whom were considering GOP presidential runs.

But how to measure pro-Gingrich or anti-Cain bias? Why, you call Media Matters, the liberal organization that closely monitors Fox News. Spokeswoman Jess Levin provided a tally of Fox News appearances by possible GOP candidates between Jan. 1 and May 13 – the day before Cain’s speech to Georgia Republicans in Macon.

The results might surprise you. Cain actually made more appearances on Fox News than either Gingrich or Santorum. Though not as many as Donald Trump or Michele Bachman.

Mitt Romney was close to the bottom – mostly likely the result of his under-the-radar strategy.

Mike Huckabee, who bowed of the GOP contest on Saturday, topped all – but his tally includes episodes of his weekly Fox News show. Here’s the total:

– Mike Huckabee: 55

– Michele Bachmann: 29

– Donald Trump: 29

– John Bolton: 24

– Tim Pawlenty: 21

– Herman Cain: 19

– Ron Paul: 14

– Newt Gingrich: 13

– Rick Santorum: 13

– Sarah Palin: 12

– Rudy Giuliani: 8

– Haley Barbour: 5

– Gary Johnson: 2

– Mitt Romney: 3

– Buddy Roemer: 1

***
On the Newt Gingrich front, AJC’s Politifact Georgia takes a look at Newt Gingrich’s declaration to Republicans in Macon last week that Barack Obama is the “food stamp president.”

And the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank issues a spirited defense of Gingrich as a needed voice of Republican moderation.

***
Also in today’s Washington Post, reporters Phil Rucker and Lori Montgomery include this passage about the collapse of the Gang of Six effort at negotiating a federal deficit deal:

[U.S. Sen. Saxby] Chambliss suggested Tuesday that the group, at the very least, owes its Senate allies a report on its work.

Those close to the talks said trouble has been brewing for weeks. Earlier this month, the group appeared to be tantalizingly close to an agreement. But then, Democratic sources said, [U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.] started bringing up new issues at every meeting, or demanding that old ones be reconsidered.

For example, Coburn began pressing for sharper cuts to Social Security than had been previously agreed to, according to sources familiar with the talks who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the private nature of the negotiations. And during a three-hour session late Monday, the sources said, Coburn demanded deep and immediate cuts to Medicare that went beyond anything previously proposed.

On Tuesday morning, Coburn called Durbin to say he was dropping out. He later told reporters that the group was at an “impasse” and complained that Democrats were unwilling to do enough to cut spending, particularly on federal retirement programs such as Social Security and Medicare.

***
Earlier this week, in an Atlanta appearance before Carter Associates, a real estate development firm, U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson gave a relatively gloomy prognosis for the real estate industry in Georgia.

Recovery is “five to seven years away,” and new lending restrictions are counter productive. A clip:

***
Also on the real estate front, Scott Henry of Creative Loafing has a look at the City Hall East deal in Atlanta:

But now I’m told the negotiations between the city and Jamestown are over and both sides are ready to sign on the line that is dotted. And yet, the whole deal could still go kablooey this week if the federal government doesn’t approve $15 million in tax credits that the city and the developer have already agreed to.

- By Jim Galloway, Political Insider

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

68 comments Add your comment

TruthBTold

May 18th, 2011
5:36 pm

Dictionary definition of a liberal: “not narrow in opinion or judgement, tolerant; favoring political and social reform.” Journalism should be the conscience of a nation. Journalism should be the watchdog for our liberties. That in itself should make good journalism liberal.
It was the AJC who exposed the cruelty and hypocracy of the Jim Crow Laws, and it was the AJC that was the conscience of Georgians during the civil rights struggle. American revolutionaries and Jeffersonian republicans were liberals. Most of the protesters of the “Arab Spring” in 2011 are liberals.
Seems to me that some want to derogatorily put a “liberal” label on any person or group that disagrees with their views.

Atlanta Native

May 18th, 2011
5:57 pm

Yes, but “liberal” is the tag word for those who consider themselves “Progressives”. While I agree with some of your propositions, the patriots were fiscal conservatives who were upset about too much taxation, so your analogy fails.

I believe a better argument is that Jesus was a “liberal” under your definition. He stood up to the authoritative Pharisees and Sadducees and invoked many a parable castigating the rich. However, he could also be seen as a fiscal conservative and social liberal, as he left the matters of money to Caesar and ate with Matthew the tax collector while he mainly focused on social issues.

A “Progressive” is someone who seeks to protect the masses (whom they view with contempt) to keep them fat and happy and out of the their lives.

Gagodown

May 18th, 2011
6:23 pm

Hahaha Herman Cain just because you are a Republican doesn’t mean you are not a N***r to them, here is your truth serum, wake up and smell the coffee, spent your life sucking up to them but now they ready to pull the whip out on you. They don’t want another black man in the White House.

DannyX

May 18th, 2011
6:33 pm

Ferguson,

Undeclared Obama was the choice of 17% of Democratic voters 2 full years before the election, ahead of both Kerry and Edwards. (CNN Nov 1, 2006)

Cain is currently at ZERO% less than a year away from most of the Republican primaries. Cain would have to leap frog 10 Republican candidates to win the election. Its not going to happen.

Cain’s biggest problem at this point is not Liberals or Dems, it’s reality.

mehlman rings twice

May 18th, 2011
6:39 pm

I miss the good old days of the Bush propaganda machine that embedded fake journalists in the WH press corp in order to ask softball questions.

mehlman rings twice

May 18th, 2011
6:42 pm

How funny about Sen. Tom Coburn. After he was found to be the pimp in the John Ensign affair he been busy trying to restore his image.

Minus Clous

May 18th, 2011
6:45 pm

Obama is a softball and he gets softball questions pre-selected for him Mehlman rings twice. The media has a slobbering love affair with this fake, fool and fraud. The media never asked Obama a hard question because they are already selected for him.

DannyX

May 18th, 2011
6:52 pm

I will admit Cain at ZERO% is a little misleading.

When you consider the Bradley Effect Cain is actually at -10%.

mehlman rings twice

May 18th, 2011
7:01 pm

Minus Clous @ 6:45 pm:
I see that you added “fake”, “fool”, and “fraud” to the list of derogatory names thrown at President Obama. Just remember that at the end of the day he will be spending another night in the White House. By the way, how is your 401K account doing compared to Fall 2008?

Pewter

May 18th, 2011
11:30 pm

Who cares? Republicans are just stupid and dumb. They’re grasping for straws… chasing waterfalls, even. Republicans are a bunch of liars, crooks, and the scum of the earth.

Jon Lester

May 19th, 2011
9:40 am

I think any attempt at fact-based reporting would be considered liberal bias by some of you.

brandon

May 19th, 2011
10:38 am

I listen to alot of talk radio and some fox news when time allows. I’ve been thinking for a few weeks that the most watched shows are bias.

Certianly Huckabee gets the most play but he’s out. Hannity looks to be more loyal to Bachman, Romney(supported him last time), Santorum, and then Gingrich in my opinion.

Hannity has said that he’ll give equal time to all GOP candidates but we will see. Neal Bortz seems to be softening his opinions on Newt and has admitted that he really likes Cain but fears what the left will do to a great man. Don’t know about Rush???

I’m a Cain fan and tell everyone I know that he’s my man. He needs to be on Fox & Friends and every other show over the next few months to gain name recognition with independents and voters outside of the bible belt.

A black lady called into Bortz yesterday and said “it’s going to take a black man to beat a black man.” I certainly think a good candidate can beat Obama but you have to admit that Cain could fight fire with fire!!!!

Joyce M.

May 19th, 2011
7:47 pm

Herman Cain supporters are becoming the new Paultards, without half the facts and less than half the ideas. Keep whining Caintards because it’s all you know how to do.

phil c

May 20th, 2011
1:48 am

Herman Cain will be the first President to speak English as a second language.

Pick Axe

May 20th, 2011
4:55 am

Where is Herman Cain’s long form birth certificate?

Isakson lies about what caused the housing bubble

May 20th, 2011
7:04 am

Isakson seems to have forgotten that the housing bubble was fueled by highly leveraged credit default swaps and derivatives. These instruments were abused by Wall Street firms. It made them lots of money and then the scam failed due to a minute rise in the default rates.

Isakson tells the big-time lie that Fannie and Freddie caused the 2008 crash. They are great scapegoats due to the fact that they are dangerously bloated institutions with a history of corrupt accounting practices and other vices. But they did not cause the disaster. In fact Fannie Mae, like so many others foolishly took the bait that Wall Street put-out and in so doing, lost a ton of money.

Isakson should explain how he helped to bail-out the Wall Street firms that crashed our economy and then took their campaign donations.

Isakson is a big-time liar

May 20th, 2011
7:13 am

Isakson says that Wall Street was only doing what Fannie and Freedie mandated. Wow, that’s a whopper! The best part of a lie like that is that there are a lot of people who believe it.

So, my hat’s off to Johnny Isakson for the best told lie of the day! Now, let’s see if he can take it up to the next level. I look forward to him warning us that Iran has WMD and is in league with Al Qaeda. Remember, George Bush still holds the national record for lies that have consequences.