Nine down, three to go: A dozen debates by candidates for governor may be a record-breaker

You and I can complain all we want about the apocalyptic nature of Georgia’s race for governor — at least the part seen through 30-second TV ads.

According to Democrat Roy Barnes, life without him as governor would be best symbolized by a honking, driverless SUV in an empty parking lot. And Republican Nathan Deal says that, minus him, the state Capitol would be a cratered, nuclear wasteland.

Even so, the contest among Barnes, Deal and Libertarian John Monds has been admirable, even historic, by one important measure. Since August, the three candidates for governor have already debated nine times.

Three more meetings, all televised, dominate the final weekend before the vote: 12:30 p.m. Saturday on Channel 2 Action News, 5 p.m. on Fox 5, and 7 p.m. Sunday on Georgia Public Broadcasting. The GPB debate will be aired statewide.

One of these three candidates will have more impact on your life than anyone else you cast a vote for. The next governor will determine the conditions of the roads you drive, the quality of the classrooms your kids sit in, and the availability of the water you drink.

If they’re still strangers by the time you vote Tuesday, it’s your own fault.

Veterans of state politics can’t remember a set of candidates for governor so willing to share the stage — at fairgrounds, in community centers, in one synagogue and several chilled TV studios across the state. We may never again see the like of it.

The debates haven’t been kissing contests. Harsh words have been thrown. At one, Deal’s hasty exit — ahead of a troop of reporters who wanted to question him about his congressional office’s involvement in a business dealing — dominated a news cycle.

Yet the sheer number of forums is proof that the staffs of the Barnes and Deal campaigns — at least on one level — get along surprisingly well.

In mid-August, the two sides sat down with a spreadsheet of 50 or more invitations, and narrowed down their joint appearances to a dozen — about three times the usual number.

The Barnes campaign vetoed appearances before tea party crowds. Both candidates felt obliged to appear at The Temple and its largely Jewish audience in Atlanta. Appearances in Perry and Albany were mandatory, both agreed. Invitations from several universities were consolidated into a single debate hosted by college students on GPB. Televised settings were given precedence.

Location mattered.

“We agreed to all these debates because we wanted geographic distribution of the debate settings — and we accomplished that,” said Brian Robinson, spokesman for the Deal campaign.

Thanks to Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas, political debates have a special place in American history. They are beloved by everyone — except political campaigners, who believe them to be inefficient, exhausting and dangerous.

Even with televised debates, audiences are relatively small. The Channel 2 and Fox 5 confrontations on Saturday will compete with college football, including the Georgia-Florida game. The GPB debate on Sunday will go up against an army of Halloween trick-or-treaters.

So from a campaigner’s point of view, there is little to gain in a debate, and much to risk.

A Barnes gaffe from a last debate in 2002 — trying to play down the deaths of foster children in state custody, the sitting governor declared that “children die every day” — was revived by the Republican Governors Association for use during the current campaign.

That said, Barnes is an attorney who excels at closing arguments before juries, and he’s been in his element during most of the debates this fall. Yet Deal — also an attorney — has been no one’s plaything.

“I think Perry was a good one,” said Chris Carpenter, the Barnes campaign manager. The debate at the Georgia National Fairgrounds was a raucous affair. Booing and jeering from the audience are traditional ingredients.

The former governor showed up in jeans and a sports jacket, and outlined the final theme of his campaign: “The question is, who is best qualified, in this difficult time, to lead the big business of the state of Georgia through these difficult times — and without scandal.”

Deal’s best performance may have been this week, in the odd setting picked by 11 Alive — three chairs in the cavernous state Capitol. The debate, aired at noon Wednesday, was a comparatively calm discussion.

“Nathan’s a nice guy. He doesn’t relish the punch-a-thon. When he has to fight he can — it’s not his first resort,” said Robinson, spokesman for the Deal campaign.

Monds, the Libertarian, has played the third wheel throughout. He occasionally makes news — in the 11 Alive debate, he said he would support the legalization of marijuana.

But Monds has been treated politely — the several thousand votes he’s likely to draw could determine whether the race for governor ends Tuesday, or continues for another four weeks.

With another round of debates.

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter, or connect with me on Facebook.

54 comments Add your comment

professional skeptic

October 28th, 2010
12:06 pm

True Republican
October 28th, 2010
11:40 am

True Republican, stop lying. The final, unanimous conclusion of that bipartisan ethics panel was to elevate Nathan Deal’s case to the Ethics Committe for full investigation, just like they did with Maxine Waters and Charlie Rangel.

Alabama Communist

October 28th, 2010
1:13 pm

Nine down, three to go: A dozen debates by candidates for governor may be a record-breaker* Jim

Not only a record, but the Candiates have started having empty chairs with a sign posted on it ” Unknown Corrupt Candiate for Governor”

ROBOCOP

October 28th, 2010
3:55 pm

Oh, True Republican, were you telling a fib? Tsk, tsk !!! Well, based on what you’re saying, why then did he and Casey Cagle go and lean on Bart Graham, your Republican Commissioner over Revenue? But even if it’s true and there is no tax money involved, do you think it’s appropriate for the Governor of the state to have a business interest where he approves the continued operation of the program? It’s still clearly a conflict of interest. If more cuts at Revenue are needed or if Revenue wishes to pursue putting the project out for bids, what do you think are the chances are of cutting the program or bidding it out for a better price to consumers I thought you Republicans believed in a free market economy, where competitiveness drives the prices of services.

What about the property he leases tot he State? Should he continue doing that where he clearly gets to decide what tax dollars are paid to landlords who lease property to the state?

So, far you’re getting a “D -” on answering the essay question.

Any other takers?

Virginia

October 28th, 2010
10:19 pm

True Rep, refresh your memory.
http://oce.house.gov/disclosures/Review_No_09-1022_Referral_to_Standards.pdf
Then please tell us on what page we find the conclusion that Deal did nothing wrong.
Never mind, I’ll help you out. This is what you’ll find on page 23, cut & pasted directly from the document linked above: “For all the reasons stated above, the OCE Board recommends further review by the
Committee on Standards of Official Conduct.” And not, as you stated, that Congressman Deal did not violate the rules. Nice try. Try harder without misrepresenting, please.