Beverly Scott on the likelihood of a state arm around MARTA’s shoulders

A Republican lawmaker from Dunwoody this week added a new dimension to metro Atlanta’s debate over transportation — a proposal that the state of Georgia assume control of MARTA.

Unlike other GOP offers to seize urban assets — Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport comes to mind — Fran Millar’s overture doesn’t come in the spirit of a hostile takeover.

Instead, Millar said, his proposal is spurred by recognition that Fulton and DeKalb counties can no longer finance the Southeast’s largest mass transit system by themselves, and that the entire state’s economic future depends on cobbling together a larger metro Atlanta network.

Also, voters in cars are getting pretty ticked.

“This isn’t about MARTA. This is about a larger transportation plan that includes MARTA,” Millar said in an interview.

The lawmaker sketched out his idea in an opinion piece in Sunday’s AJC. But he has been testing his message for weeks. Last month, Millar delivered his pitch to the North Fulton Chamber of Commerce. Afterward, another speaker at the meeting wrapped him in a bear hug.

She was Beverly Scott, the CEO and general manager of MARTA.

But in the cold light of day, away from the enthusiasm of the moment, what’s to be made of such an offer?

Republican wags at the state Capitol denigrate MARTA as a sinkhole of waste and inefficiency, but the reputation of the state Department of Transportation — where Millar would lodge MARTA, under the control of the governor — is no better.

In a sidewalk discussion this week, one GOP strategist didn’t dispute that Millar’s proposal may be grounded in logic and common sense. But he said the lawmaker’s biggest hurdle would be Republican apathy.

During hard times, life is divided into baubles and necessities. And among many of Millar’s GOP brethren, MARTA remains a bauble.

Several hours later, in Scott’s sixth-floor office, the general manager of MARTA said much the same thing. Very politely.

A merger with state government is likely to be a highly emotional issue, on both sides of the coin, she acknowledged.

But the MARTA board, Scott said, understands “that with new funding and with new partners, there’s going to be a change in governance. No question.”

Scott wouldn’t expect the state to be a majority partner, but there would be a cost. That would be the point. “You don’t just get to talk about taking it over. It’s about having the state and others step up,” she said.

“If we don’t wind up being coordinated, if we are fragmented, if are balkanized, if we are cannibalizing ourselves for no good reason, that’s not where we want to end up being.”

Scott is unsure what value Republicans in the Capitol place on mass transit. Her experience from the winter session of the Legislature still stings.

Under state law, MARTA isn’t allowed to spend more than 50 percent of its sales tax revenue on operating expenses. The rest must go toward infrastructure.

Scott prowled the hallways of the Capitol last year, arguing that more access to its own cash was necessary if MARTA were to survive. The Legislature refused.

Only a dose of federal stimulus money and a last-minute, financial two-step by the Atlanta Regional Commission and its chairman, Sam Olens, averted a shutdown of much of the mass transit agency’s operations.

The incident still elicits a flash of anger from Scott. “If there had been no federal stimulus, if there had been no ARC, we would have had to close down the service and nobody cared. We were at our knees and that was no joke,” she remembered.

Millar thinks the MARTA executive misinterprets the real meaning of what happened. The action by the ARC, Millar said, was the first substantive recognition by other metro Atlanta counties that they bear some responsibility for keeping MARTA afloat.

And that’s a good thing.

Millar takes Scott’s point on the reluctance of many Republican lawmakers to embrace the necessity of mass transit. But events may be conspiring to change that.

On March 31, while the Legislature is likely to be in session, the MARTA-operated transit system in troubled Clayton County is scheduled to shut down for lack of funding. Riders on the system took 2 million trips last year and 60 percent of them used the service to get to and from jobs.

Though the system is only 6 years old, Clayton buses carry some of the heaviest loads in Georgia. Two-thirds of the riders say they have no other form of transportation.

The Legislature will be asked to help save it, and will have to decide if it wants to be something more than a bystander to disaster. “The impending shutdown of the Clayton County bus system may be just the catalyst necessary to get this off the dime,” Millar said.

For instant updates, follow me on Twitter.

12 comments Add your comment

AngryVoter

October 21st, 2009
8:55 pm

Why are we stuck with Bozo, Ronald McDonald and Krusty as our only candidates for governor while someone with Millar’s good common sense isn’t on the ballot? Millar doesn’t appear to be posturing, trying to exert political power or out to get someone or the opposite party. We need more like her!

Albert Chambers

October 21st, 2009
11:06 pm

Angry Voter, I feel your pain as I too get very, very angry over the lack of common sense in or GA Legislature and their oversight of Marta.

Mr. Fran Millar would be a great Governor if he were to aspire for the position.

City Employee

October 21st, 2009
11:12 pm

It’s in the best interests of both Marta and the state to institute some type of partnership, as the two need each other. MARTA needs case, and how attractive would Georgia be with a city the size of Atlanta with no public transit system. Even if it was only one or two days a week.

Being that MARTA has been in existence since the 70s, its befuddling that its lines don’t extend at least to Douglasville, Lithonia, Stockbridge, Alpharetta, and Lawrenceville. 10 years from now, 285 will be a near-permanent parking lot. As a democrat, I applaud Millar’s proposal. At someone is sensible about solving problems and not playing politics. The Atlanta region produces 51% of the state’s tax revenue. The next governor has to make transporation their 1st priority behind fixing the budget. Get out of 1980 and let’s get it done.

Union City

October 22nd, 2009
8:47 am

City Employee..you are so right. Transportation needs to be a priority and a BIG one in the next session. They need to stop blowing wind and do some very accelerated problem solving and take action. If we have another transportation study and do nothing with it.

Gary

October 22nd, 2009
11:22 am

As a conservative and someone who votes Republican most of the time, I applaud Fran Miller for thinking outside the box and getting a voice out about the transportation needs to the region. City Employee is right about the long time coming need for the state and MARTA to form a partnership. The Atlanta metro area not only needs a mass transit solution, but so does the connecting region. Atlanta to neighboring cities could produce an economic boom for the area and restart the growth that the south has recently enjoyed. People will only come here if we show that we are serious about solving this problem.

Transportation and water should be the top two issues facing state lawmakers during the 2010 session. Couple that with our education mess and we have three things that all of the Governor candidates should be discussing next year. I don’t want to hear about anything else unless the candidates can show me three very detailed plans on how they are going to tackle these big issues. The future of Georgia and the southern region depends on it.

merlot winters

October 22nd, 2009
11:27 am

Personally, i believe it will take the passing of the generation that went to high school in Georgia before desegregation before a serious regional transportation system that extends beyond Fulton and Dekalb and that includes more than GRTA buses can be established. Hope this is wrong.

atlsenga

October 22nd, 2009
11:59 am

In the state of Massachusetts, they have MASSPORT. It runs the airport, ferries,buses, the “T” in Boston, commuter rail that feeds into the “T” from the surrounding counties, etc. It is a partnership with both private and public transportation. It is a single coordinated effort that enables the entire Boston area – which has MASSIVE traffic issues- to run quit smoothly. Is it perfect? No. But we do need the ARC/State of GA/MARTA to work TOGETHER to find creative, EFFICIENT solutions. Ms. Scott was indeed shackled by archaic governance rules that do not allow her to efficiently run MARTA. The irony is that MARTA does indeed have reserve funds, they just cannot access them. MARTA has not always been the best run organization, but Ms. Scott, who has also inherited the sins of her predecessors, is trying to turn around this dinosaur of MARTA. The dialogue of ideas has started, and that is a good thing.

notbad

October 22nd, 2009
12:00 pm

Something has to happen. Overall, the problem isnt with the rank and file bus drivers and station attendants, its with the white-collar morons running the show at Lindbergh. A change in management/culling of dead wood would definitely be beneficial.

Atlanta Marta Rider

October 22nd, 2009
12:10 pm

If Mr. Millar opens the coversation in the Legislature to expand the Marta transit system to serve ALL surrounding counties, then I support him.

I’m a Monday – Friday Marta rider and a resident of Fulton County. I’d love to see the State pitch in to support Marta and I think it is time that Marta had better oversight and be required to turn in yearly audits.

I ride Marta to avoid the morning traffic congestion. If the expansion of Marta can cut traffic down by 10%, then it is worth an investment by the State.

Base

October 23rd, 2009
12:23 pm

Give it to GRTA they can solve any problem – do nothing.

South Metro

October 25th, 2009
5:53 am

Atlanta Marta Rider, the best way for traffic congestino to decrease is for commuter rail to begin operation. Just how you ride MARTA to avoid congestion, those in the surrounding counties would ride MARTA to avoid the 2 hour commutes. However, commuter rail brings in a another coordination problem – GDOT. GDOT originally planned for the Atlanta to Lovejoy Commuter Rail to be up and running by 2006 and the Atlanta to Athens line to be running around 2011. Regardless of why these projects have not begun construction, GDOT needs to put them as #1 priority for prosperity of the region.

MBTA

October 25th, 2009
8:14 pm

To atlsenga: MassPort does not operate the MBTA (”T”) in Boston. MassPort is a state agency that operates Logan Int’l Airport in Boston, as well as cargo facilities in Boston, and the Tobin Bridge, a major route in to and out of Boston.
The “T” is another state agency that operates bus and subway service in Greater Boston, as well as commuter rail in the same area.
Both agencies have their own boards of directors, all appointed by the governor. The mayor of Boston and other local, suburban political leaders have no say in the selection of board members or the GM’s of these two agencies. These agencies serve primarily as a dumping ground for friends and contributors of state reps and state senators. Their missions are secondary.
MassPort does a decent job of running its affairs. It makes payments in lieu of taxes to the city of Boston for land it operates on. On the other hand, the MBTA is run about as ineptly as one will find. Fares always go up, service is horrid, and they are always out of money.
I hope this clears up any misconceptions.