Comments on: Your morning jolt: Committee chairman says embryonic stem cell bill won’t move out of House http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/ From the ATL to DC with Jim Galloway: Because all politics is local Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:32:35 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: atlantalefty http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1814 atlantalefty Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:22:42 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1814 Perhaps fultonrighty can 'adopt' a freezer full... ahhh-- the absurdity of the farrrr right... adopting embryos-- perhaps these guys should just stop and listen to their own voices for a minute-- they might just realize how really funny they are... personally I believe the ONLY solution is a tax cut for the wealthy-- Did I say That? Perhaps fultonrighty can ‘adopt’ a freezer full…
ahhh– the absurdity of the farrrr right…
adopting embryos– perhaps these guys should just stop and listen to their own voices for a minute– they might just realize how really funny they are… personally I believe the ONLY solution is a tax cut for the wealthy– Did I say That?

]]> By: fultonrighty http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1812 fultonrighty Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:33:44 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1812 "Bad Day," This is a different bill (SB 169). Mills' Embryo Adoption (HB 388)is not controversial--just formalizes the process of adopting embryos, and it is optional. People who don't want the protections of adopting can do it under contract law as it is done now. SB 169 stands up to the wide open Obama "policy" of letting scientists have at it doing experiments that kill embryos with our tax money. Doesn't it cheapen all human beings to allow even tiny ones to be created to be destroyed? “Bad Day,” This is a different bill (SB 169). Mills’ Embryo Adoption (HB 388)is not controversial–just formalizes the process of adopting embryos, and it is optional. People who don’t want the protections of adopting can do it under contract law as it is done now.
SB 169 stands up to the wide open Obama “policy” of letting scientists have at it doing experiments that kill embryos with our tax money. Doesn’t it cheapen all human beings to allow even tiny ones to be created to be destroyed?

]]> By: Bad Day for Rep. Mills « Left on Lanier http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1809 Bad Day for Rep. Mills « Left on Lanier Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:08:07 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1809 [...] we find out that his embryo adoption plan won’t see the light of day. [...] [...] we find out that his embryo adoption plan won’t see the light of day. [...]

]]> By: chris http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1807 chris Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:49:01 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1807 well said atlantalefty. also, this issue has absolutly nothing to do with abortion. these embryos have not nor will they ever be implanted. well said atlantalefty. also, this issue has absolutly nothing to do with abortion. these embryos have not nor will they ever be implanted.

]]> By: Aaron Burr V. Mexico http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1806 Aaron Burr V. Mexico Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:38:21 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1806 Morally I am opposed to Abortion. I agree that it cheapens the value of human life. Having said that, are you REALLY prepared to defend embyro's as human beings? Because if you are, you're essentially saying that any woman who is pregnant, even if she doesn't know it, could be committing Manslaughter by having a miscarriage. Morally I am opposed to Abortion. I agree that it cheapens the value of human life.

Having said that, are you REALLY prepared to defend embyro’s as human beings? Because if you are, you’re essentially saying that any woman who is pregnant, even if she doesn’t know it, could be committing Manslaughter by having a miscarriage.

]]> By: atlantalefty http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1805 atlantalefty Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:27:42 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1805 Thank goodness-- saved from the rambling stupidity of the right for another year-- lets's find a more permanent solution and vote these guys out of office-- NOW... These guys fiddle while Rome burns... the answer to every problem seems to be a tax cut or better yet some limitation on personal freedoms... Thank goodness– saved from the rambling stupidity of the right for another year–
lets’s find a more permanent solution and vote these guys out of office– NOW… These guys fiddle while Rome burns… the answer to every problem seems to be a tax cut or better yet some limitation on personal freedoms…

]]> By: fultonrighty http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/30/your-morning-jolt-committee-chairman-says-embryonic-stem-cell-bill-wont-move-out-of-house/comment-page-1/#comment-1800 fultonrighty Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:08:42 +0000 http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=860#comment-1800 We are impressed with Chairman Amerson's resume for many scientific issues, but nothing in life sciences. And besides, this is an ethical issue: do we or do we not use tiny human beings for spare parts? We are impressed with Chairman Amerson’s resume for many scientific issues, but nothing in life sciences. And besides, this is an ethical issue: do we or do we not use tiny human beings for spare parts?

]]>