<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The House speaker and governor talk, and the transportation debate changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/27/the-house-speaker-and-governor-talk-and-the-transportation-debate-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/27/the-house-speaker-and-governor-talk-and-the-transportation-debate-changes/</link>
	<description>From the ATL to DC with Jim Galloway: Because all politics is local</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 04:30:40 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cc</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/27/the-house-speaker-and-governor-talk-and-the-transportation-debate-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-1802</link>
		<dc:creator>cc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=837#comment-1802</guid>
		<description>&quot;Captitol Hack&quot; hit it right on the nose!  

It&#039;s incredible that anyone would buy all the politician&#039;s bull about how this new &quot;governence bill&quot; will fix problems they say are caused by GDOT. As correctly stated in Jay Bookman&#039;s editiorial in today&#039;s paper, our state leaders want you to believe the solution to GDOT&#039;s problems is &quot;taking a system crippled by political meddling &amp; &quot;fixing it&quot; by making it even more vulnerable to such meddling. That&#039;s why the GDOT Board was crated long ago in the 1st place; to remove or further separate politics from road building! Our Governor looks like a clown when crying that giving him more control, like hasn&#039;t had control in the past (Sonny&#039;s Fast Forward program caused most of GDOTs funding &amp; accounting issues), will result in a more efficient transportation system. And no doubt he would bring back his &quot;girl puppet&quot; Gina to be the Director. What a disaster &amp; slap in the face that would be to those good employees.

I fail to understand why more citizens do not recognize this. An outcry should go out to our legislators telling them to see to it that GDOT is properly &amp; adequately funded; then let them alone &amp; let them do their jobs.

Meanwhile let&#039;s call it what it is..............nothing more than a &quot;Power Grab&quot; by Governor Clown!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Captitol Hack&#8221; hit it right on the nose!  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s incredible that anyone would buy all the politician&#8217;s bull about how this new &#8220;governence bill&#8221; will fix problems they say are caused by GDOT. As correctly stated in Jay Bookman&#8217;s editiorial in today&#8217;s paper, our state leaders want you to believe the solution to GDOT&#8217;s problems is &#8220;taking a system crippled by political meddling &amp; &#8220;fixing it&#8221; by making it even more vulnerable to such meddling. That&#8217;s why the GDOT Board was crated long ago in the 1st place; to remove or further separate politics from road building! Our Governor looks like a clown when crying that giving him more control, like hasn&#8217;t had control in the past (Sonny&#8217;s Fast Forward program caused most of GDOTs funding &amp; accounting issues), will result in a more efficient transportation system. And no doubt he would bring back his &#8220;girl puppet&#8221; Gina to be the Director. What a disaster &amp; slap in the face that would be to those good employees.</p>
<p>I fail to understand why more citizens do not recognize this. An outcry should go out to our legislators telling them to see to it that GDOT is properly &amp; adequately funded; then let them alone &amp; let them do their jobs.</p>
<p>Meanwhile let&#8217;s call it what it is&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..nothing more than a &#8220;Power Grab&#8221; by Governor Clown!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Capitol Hack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/27/the-house-speaker-and-governor-talk-and-the-transportation-debate-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-1797</link>
		<dc:creator>Capitol Hack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=837#comment-1797</guid>
		<description>Please!  Talk about a dysfunctional model!  This is a recipe for transportation disaster.  Many years ago the General Assembly largely removed politics (ie, the Governor)from roadbuilding, and Georgia developed a professional DOT that has been the envy of other states.  Our highway system has been better than most other states. But we&#039;re about to screw it up with this model.  What CEO would want to preside over this organizational mess?  You&#039;ll have legislators deciding road projects based on whim and politics, instead of professional engineers and traffic managers making informed decisions.  You&#039;ll have a &quot;planner&quot; within DOT spending money for the Governor and not answerable to the commissioner.  Who is supposed to set transportation strategy in this new wreck of a model? Who&#039;s actually in charge?  Where is the accountability? 

Georgia&#039;s current transportation problems are largely the result of our rapid growth outstripping the ability to pay for the improvements we need, plus a funding model that dictates roads over other transportation alternatives.  Giving politicians the power to spend money on their favorite road projects is only going to make the problems worse.  What a bass-akwards approach!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please!  Talk about a dysfunctional model!  This is a recipe for transportation disaster.  Many years ago the General Assembly largely removed politics (ie, the Governor)from roadbuilding, and Georgia developed a professional DOT that has been the envy of other states.  Our highway system has been better than most other states. But we&#8217;re about to screw it up with this model.  What CEO would want to preside over this organizational mess?  You&#8217;ll have legislators deciding road projects based on whim and politics, instead of professional engineers and traffic managers making informed decisions.  You&#8217;ll have a &#8220;planner&#8221; within DOT spending money for the Governor and not answerable to the commissioner.  Who is supposed to set transportation strategy in this new wreck of a model? Who&#8217;s actually in charge?  Where is the accountability? </p>
<p>Georgia&#8217;s current transportation problems are largely the result of our rapid growth outstripping the ability to pay for the improvements we need, plus a funding model that dictates roads over other transportation alternatives.  Giving politicians the power to spend money on their favorite road projects is only going to make the problems worse.  What a bass-akwards approach!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/27/the-house-speaker-and-governor-talk-and-the-transportation-debate-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-1739</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=837#comment-1739</guid>
		<description>It does sound pretty good.  The only thing is who will Sonny pick for the director of planning?  My guess would be his girl Gena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It does sound pretty good.  The only thing is who will Sonny pick for the director of planning?  My guess would be his girl Gena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Montana</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/03/27/the-house-speaker-and-governor-talk-and-the-transportation-debate-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-1736</link>
		<dc:creator>Montana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/?p=837#comment-1736</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t sound as awful as some of the other scenarios -- like the legislature getting to decide nearly every single project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t sound as awful as some of the other scenarios &#8212; like the legislature getting to decide nearly every single project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
