Woman, 25, says she’s marrying Charles Manson

Charles Manson with Star in a picture posted by MansonDirect.com, a site maintained by Star and other supporters of the convicted killer.

Charles Manson with Star in a picture posted by MansonDirect.com, a site maintained by Star and other supporters of the convicted killer.

Deranged madman Charles Manson is getting married, if you believe a 25-year-old supporter of the imprisoned killer.

“I’ll tell you straight up, Charlie and I are going to get married,” a woman Manson has named ‘Star’ says in the most recent issue of Rolling Stone.

“When that will be, we don’t know. But I take it very seriously. Charlie is my husband. Charlie told me to tell you this.”

Manson, as most of you know, was convicted in Los Angeles in 1971 for conspiracy to commit multiple murders, including that of actress Sharon Tate.

Manson, now 79, has a history of dodging death, but he’s been married twice.

He and three members of the “Manson Family” were given the death penalty, but the sentences were reduced to life without parole after the California Supreme Court outlawed capital punishment in 1972. California reinstated the death penalty in 1978, but the sentences of Manson and his followers were not changed.

Sirhan Sirhan, sentenced to death for the 1968 assassination of U.S. Sen. Robert Kennedy also had his sentence commuted to life in prison.

Rolling Stone says Star first heard of Manson while a teenager in Illinois. She spent most of her high school years locked in her room “smoking marijuana, eating mushrooms, not [wanting] to go to church every Sunday.”

A “friend” gave her some of Manson’s rants about saving the environment and she started writing him letters. At age 19 she hopped a bus and moved to California so she could visit him regularly in Corcoran State Prison and run a website featuring the latest Manson news.

When the Rolling Stone writer told Star she looked a lot like Manson follower Susan Atkins, who Manson dubbed “Sexy Sadie” after hearing the Beatles song, she didn’t like the comparison.

“That [bleep] was [bleeping] crazy,” she said. “She was a crazy [bleeping] whore. She didn’t know what she was doing.”

Susan Atkins was convicted of murder and testified against Charles Manson in 1969. (Photo by Ralph Crane/Getty Images)

Susan Atkins was convicted of murder and testified against Charles Manson in 1969. (Photo by Ralph Crane/Getty Images)

Manson, writer of the song “Garbage Dump,” sang a familiar refrain when asked about the pending nuptials.

“That’s a bunch of garbage. You know that, man. That’s trash. We’re just playing that for public consumption.”

Fortunately for humanity, there will be no little Mansons in Star’s future. California does not allow “lifers” to have conjugal visits.

More news from this crazy world:

26 comments Add your comment

Thor

November 21st, 2013
10:48 am

In our society it is a person’s right to be a stupid, bleepin’ idiot if they so choose…..as long as others are not harmed in any way. They are out there. She is one of them.

BlackCuckConners

November 21st, 2013
11:08 am

Why is this Monster still alive? JFK a good man dead, Abe Lincoln, a good man, dead. MLK, a good man dead. Robert Kennedy, a good man dead. Yet this Monster who caused the death of several people ass is still alive and Protected from any harm. WHY? who gives a rat’s ass he is getting married? I mean REALLY are serious? This is News? No wonder this country is in the state it is. They protect the Monsters and Murder the Good People. Diana Ross sang it best UPSIDE DOWN!

Bernie31

November 21st, 2013
11:12 am

May it Be One, To Die For……..:) Uh Huh ‘)

guy

November 21st, 2013
11:17 am

I m not hating or defending that pyscho but why did you use Abe Lincoln as an example? If you’re going to use a dead person as an example, use someone that might still be alive. Abe Lincoln would still be dead even if he didn’t get shot.

S

November 21st, 2013
11:37 am

I have one question for this idiot – WHY??????????!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Billy

November 21st, 2013
11:38 am

Yes, she’s a bonifide idiot, no serious debate there. Any person who would marry a prisoner, esp one like this animal, is truly a moron of the highest order. Manson should have been put to death for his heinous crimes, but liberalism delivered him from the jaws of death. Why are inmates allowed to marry in the first place? They’re INMATES; either kill em or lock en up, away from society. This is the upside down world, brought to you by leftist nuts, who talk down to conservatives, yet have solutions to crime and punishment like the adorable example above. It’s the frog in a pot syndrome. By the time you left wing dullards find out what’s truly going on, it will be too late to be of any use…

Alice

November 21st, 2013
11:52 am

Why would ANYONE want to marry a convicted killer???

Bumper

November 21st, 2013
11:54 am

“That’s trash. We’re just playing that for public consumption.”

Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned. Star apparently had her mind set on gettin’ hitched, so it’s probably a good thing for Charlie there’s a barrier between them on visitor day.

Curt

November 21st, 2013
12:02 pm

How long before Manson tells this idiot to go kill someone, and she does it…

Maude

November 21st, 2013
12:16 pm

She is just doing this to get the monies paid to family of inmates.

Hidden agenda

November 21st, 2013
1:07 pm

Massachusetts raises minimum wage to $11 an hour and everyone who does not deliver at least that much value to their employer (actually quite a bit more when you add in SS, Medicare, and a whole host of other costs/taxes) will now be let go or will be unemployable until they get enough skills to reach that value point. But of course entry level jobs are where you gain those skills and now the unskilled cannot get them.

Not to worry, the productive people of Mass will now just pick up the check for these new additions to the government welfare roles. Way to go Massachusetts.

The Geezer

November 21st, 2013
1:27 pm

Deranged madmen always get the babes.

scary times

November 21st, 2013
1:49 pm

Wow! Put that on your Sundae!

BlackCuckConners

November 21st, 2013
2:04 pm

@Guy
It does NOT matter that Lincoln would be dead now. That had Nothing to do with him being KILLED long before his time. Same with John and Robert Kennedy. My point IS. It appears MURDERS are Protected more than people who were trying to make a Difference in the lives of others. I stand by what I said.

Voice of Insanity

November 21st, 2013
2:22 pm

Uh, John Wilkes Booth was not protected by society. He died 12 days after assassinating Lincoln and your rant of murderers are protected more than the people they killed, is fraught with stupidity. Our society does not allow us to seek personal justice through murdering those who’ve wronged us. Which is where you seem to be going, and you should be grateful that we aren’t allowed to start blood-feuds and vendettas, because I don’t think any of you are true apex predators.

June

November 21st, 2013
3:08 pm

This chick is just as stupid as susan atkins what the crap do any of us need to know this crap for?

Bernie31

November 21st, 2013
3:18 pm

It use to be a Time when a Father’s concern was to keep his Daughter OFF the POLE. Now it must now add MARRYING MISCREANTS.

BlackCuckConners

November 21st, 2013
3:24 pm

@Voice of insanity and Stupidity
THat is MY opinion and if you dont like it go drown yourself.

BlackCuckConners

November 21st, 2013
3:28 pm

@Voice of Stupid and insane
better still, stand on the interstate, and let an 18 wheeler run over you.

LQQK @ Bernie31

November 21st, 2013
3:35 pm

Your daughter is finally marrying within her social and mental class, yet you appear to be very unhappy about her upcoming nupials! Be a Happy Pappy as she has finally found her soul mate! You can now rest easy in an eternal dirt nap surrounded by your beloved worms.

In the 21st century...

November 21st, 2013
4:28 pm

Mental Illness abounds.

th

November 21st, 2013
4:29 pm

Her parents must be very proud of her. Yikes!!

partlycloudy

November 21st, 2013
7:41 pm

Dear U.S Supreme Court justices who overruled the death penalty way back when and let Manson live forever on the public dime: This one is on you. The cases, including one from GA, that you overturned in banning the then existing death penalty back then, were classic cases in which the defendants deserved the death penalty. Thank God the serial killers Bundy and that dude in MO the other day did not get the gift that you Supremes gave to Charlie Manson.

The Oracle

November 22nd, 2013
2:56 pm

The glorification of evil. This article should never have been created.

todd

November 22nd, 2013
5:08 pm

Access to people,prisoners,or the outside world,especially the internet,is foolish and dangerous.It allows the risk of manipulation or recruitment into the family, to spread influence, that was supposed to be staved as an act of mercy.I don’t support the death penalty, but also do not condone unwise foolishness like allowing a proven manipulator a chance to continue the horrific influence in unseen ways,or creating a terror uneeded.The only credit that’s given,is that he’s not stupid,and even the experts can be fooled,so why take chances? Books and the light of day through the bars should be the extent of his access.

Amanda

November 23rd, 2013
7:39 pm

The woman creating news to make herself known.