
A recent infusion of zombies, seen here on Mitchell Street, may have catapulted Atlanta to No. 16 on Forbes' misery index. (AMC)
Misery loves company, and Atlantans have plenty of it in the recent “Most Miserable Cities” list put together by Forbes.
Atlanta, which didn’t crack the Top 20 in 2012, appears at No. 16 in the 2013 list. I apologize for not putting more numbers in the preceding sentence.
Why is Atlanta so miserable? High foreclosure rates, home values that are down 42% since 2007, and nasty traffic, which you probably know more about than Forbes.
Despite the rainy weather, I don’t feel more miserable than last year, but there’s an explanation for that.
The magazine has tweaked its formula, dropping two criteria — the success of sports teams and political corruption — while adding net migration, the number of people that flee the city. The other familiar barometers of displeasure — unemployment, commute times, violent crimes, home prices, foreclosures, taxes and weather – remain.
Adding net migration to the mix moved last year’s No. 1, Miami, out of the Top 20.
I guess that means last year’s list was not very good at predicting misery.
This year’s list doesn’t seem much better.
Detroit, which has been miserable since someone had the bright idea of creating the Ford Pinto, is once again America’s most pathetic zip code, according to the same magazine that put the city on the cover with the headline “City of Hope” in 2011.
Flint, another city ruined by an inept auto industry, is No. 2.
Chicago is No. 4, which seems high, though I once visited in April and almost froze to death.
Another miss is No. 9, Lake County, Illinois, which is one of the richest “towns” in America, and New York City (No. 10), which has high taxes but is otherwise considered a pretty cool place to live, else Forbes would move their offices.
Youngstown, Ohio, a city so ravaged by fate Bruce Springsteen felt compelled to write a song about it, is No. 20. Call me a “homer” if you wish, but Atlanta is a heck of a lot better place to live than Youngstown.
After carefully reviewing the list, I notice not one “miserable” city has access to a nice, warm ocean.
Thus, all Atlanta needs to be No. 1 on the “LEAST Miserable” list is a beach and schools that educate children. Those can’t be too hard to fix.
Visit Forbes for the complete list.
127 comments Add your comment
Alex
February 26th, 2013
12:28 pm
We should be number one with all of the crime certain people constantly cause.
K
February 26th, 2013
12:33 pm
Maybe Forbes knows what I knew. I got fed up and moved out of state in 2012.
Atlanta 16th most miserable city | News To Me with George Mathis | ajc.com | Georgia News Digest
February 26th, 2013
12:36 pm
[...] Go to this article [...]
Jck
February 26th, 2013
12:44 pm
Forbes is a racist magazine
Ally
February 26th, 2013
12:45 pm
To Alex, do you know who is committing these crimes? Your statement sounds like you have inside information on this..if so, please share. : )
Intown
February 26th, 2013
12:45 pm
Another arbitrary list concocted to sell magazines and cause municipal PR offices headaches. Thanks Forbes.
GUTRAKE
February 26th, 2013
12:49 pm
Hmmmm…funny…do you see any similarities in the folks running these municipalities? I do.
Digger
February 26th, 2013
12:50 pm
Seems kinda low to me.
Former Atalantan, now in New York
February 26th, 2013
12:52 pm
Understandable that Atlanta is in the Top 20…but, only after success of sports teams and political corruption were removed? Doesn’t seem right. Formula needs to be looked at again with the addition of the number of “reality” shows exploiting Atlanta’s population considered.
ko
February 26th, 2013
12:53 pm
Is the author of this article a middle schooler?