Beautiful columnist bravely bears scorn of other women

Beauty, like genius, is its own reward.

It’s also a terrible burden.

Imagine then the miserable existence of Daily Mail columnist/narcissist Samantha Brick, who recently tore herself away from a mirror long enough to pen a humble prose piece entitled: “There are downsides to looking this pretty: Why women hate me for being beautiful”

As a man, it was difficult to force my brain to read (and not simply drool) as the column is chock full of pictures detailing every alluring aspect of Brick’s self-described “lovely looks.”

You don’t get this beautiful without a little work. The genetically flawless Brick says she doesn’t drink or smoke. She works out, even when she “doesn’t feel like it,” and she “very rarely succumbs to chocolate.”

Still, the 41-year-old can’t wait to get even older so she can add some wrinkles and gray hair and begin “blending into the background” of visual mediocrity.

Brick, who’s been married to one lucky guy for four whole years, admits to flirting “to get ahead at work” because that’s what “many women do.”

But the advantage of being inhumanly attractive is weighed down by the scorn heaped upon her “tall, slim, blonde” frame by ugly, jealous women.

Female bosses are the worst — they have barred her from multiple promotions.

One “phenomenally tricky” supervisor treated her fairly … until the boss started putting on weight. Supervisor McPudge (a name I have created since none was provided) would “sneer at me in front of other colleagues that she was the star, not me.”

And more than one female friend has quit calling Brick because they can’t handle the hotness.

Brick, who looks like Aphrodite but writes like Sappho, drives her point home with searing verbosity.

“And most poignantly of all, not one girlfriend has ever asked me to be her bridesmaid.”

After reading that, I wept openly and without shame.

I also gave up all hope of claiming this year’s Pulitzer.

* Read the complete column, see jaw-dropping photos.

129 comments Add your comment

AprilFool

April 5th, 2012
9:52 am

Was this article written/published on April Fool’s Day? I am certain she is being tongue in cheek, yes? Clearly she looks in the mirror and see what we see – an attractive (stretch) woman, but by no means the most gorgeous woman she thinks she is…

Jan Laine

April 5th, 2012
9:55 am

Well……bless her heart.

jes

April 5th, 2012
10:00 am

I’m not going to put down anyone’s looks. However, one of the comments on the original article said it best:

The phenomenon that she experiences is NOT that of “she is so beautiful, I hate her”, it is more likely to be “she is a bit full of herself, I hate her”.

Williams

April 5th, 2012
10:02 am

Bless her heart…..

Gentleman Jim

April 5th, 2012
10:09 am

“it’s own reward”?

Smokewagon

April 5th, 2012
10:13 am

She’s a Brick….house!

Think much?

April 5th, 2012
10:14 am

The satire of the article is obviously lost on most AJC readers judging by the comments…

Cram

April 5th, 2012
10:18 am

Why write an article when you can just link to another?

O.B.

April 5th, 2012
10:21 am

You’re kidding right? Ok, she’s kidding right?? I have socks that are more attractive than this lady! As a man who truly appreciates and respects beautiful women (and not so beautiful) I’m actually offended that this person is attempting to pass herself off to me and the public as a “hottie”. Does she think we’re all stupid? Personally I think she’s lying ‘cuz no man in his right mind is going to bend over backward to get to know an average “lukewarmie” like her.

JC

April 5th, 2012
10:23 am

Seriously? There is nothing attractive about this woman. Maybe the UK beauty standards are different. How shallow can she be very sad.