Thousands of websites offline to protest SOPA, PIPA

Reference librarians are on high alert Wednesday as Wikipedia, the 6th biggest website on Earth, is offline along with thousands of smaller websites.

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales explains why he's pulling the plug. (AP Photo)

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales explains why he's pulling the plug. (AP Photo)

The “free encyclopedia anyone can edit” is among the many websites joining an online revolt against two anti-piracy bills currently being considered by Congress.

Other sites joining the protest Wednesday include Reddit, Wordpress, MoveOn, Boing Boing and Twitpic.

On Twitter, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales said “I hope Wikipedia [users] will melt phone systems in Washington on Wednesday. Tell everyone you know!”

The anti-piracy bills, dubbed SOPA and PIPA, are backed by the film and music industry and are allegedly designed to prevent the sharing of copyrighted material.

Opponents of SOPA read like a who’s who of the Internet. Google, Facebook, Twitter, Craigslist, eBay, Mozilla, Yahoo, AOL, and LinkedIn wrote a letter to key members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, saying SOPA poses “a serious risk to our industry’s continued track record of innovation and job creation, as well as to our nation’s cybersecurity.”

The Obama administration recently issued a statement saying new laws that protect “intellectual property online must not threaten an open and innovative Internet, ” which sounds like the threat of a veto of the proposed legislation.

WSJ owner Rupert Murdoch appears upset on Twitter. ”So Obama has thrown in his lot with Silicon Valley paymasters who threaten all software creators with piracy, plain thievery,” he wrote. ”Piracy leader is Google who streams movies free, sells advts around them. No wonder pouring millions into lobbying.”

The controversial legislation, once considered a sure thing, now appears to be “headed for a fierce fight,” reports The Wall Street Journal. The Senate will conduct a procedural vote on the legislation Jan. 24, reports the WSJ. House backers haven’t announced any plans to advance the legislation, but they said Friday that they will remove a provision that worried some cybersecurity experts.

Consumer Reports warns the legislation is “far from dead” despite opposition from the White House and recent changes to the bills.

Curtailing the piracy of copyrighted material is a tricky issue. Current federal laws prohibit the copying and redistribution of movies and music but are rarely enforced. Anyone that rides public transportation has surely been offered a bootleg DVD, but how many street peddlers get arrested?

Open source supporter Tim O’Reilly has an interesting take. He says “history teaches us that [piracy] is primarily a result of market failure, the unwillingness or inability of existing companies to provide their product at a price or in a manner that potential customers want.”

Would inexpensive CDs and DVDs or even cheaper digital downloads curtail illegal behavior? Maybe, but any capitalist will tell you it’s hard to compete with free.

38 comments Add your comment

RxDawg

January 18th, 2012
9:34 am

I’m against anything that makes more rules, more regulations, and also makes pretty much every citizen a felon. I aplaud these internet companies for fighing against this bill, it’s unamerican.

DonnaPal

January 18th, 2012
9:34 am

No person or company actually OWNS the information contained inside any encylopedia. An encylopedia is merely a collection of reports, essays or information that has alwats been readily available from mutiples sources anyway. If this law is passed, will we now be restricted to getting information only from only one source? What about bias? Freedom of speech? And to the companies lobbying for this law — This is a capitalist country – stop whining if you aren’t making as much money as you want and focus on making your product so enticing, we WANT to come to you!

roughrider

January 18th, 2012
9:42 am

And here I thought the internet was a free flow of information.

Iconoclast

January 18th, 2012
9:43 am

Now that the SCOTUS regard corporations as citizens, the entertainment empire shoudl have no trouble buying every vote on the Hill and getting the Congress to create even more avenues through which litigation can tie-up the courts and keep attorneys and producers from starving to death.

Matt

January 18th, 2012
9:45 am

This has very little to do with piracy and much more to do with giving power and control of a democrotizing platform over to a few corporate interests. Watch this Youtube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yDX8Lyl16Qs

Glenn

January 18th, 2012
9:45 am

so much for Wikipedia’s NPOV.

RonPaul2012

January 18th, 2012
9:51 am

We need to kick the federal government out of our private lives, both online and offline.

To do this, we need a new leader who both understands AND upholds the Constitution & Bill of Rights.
(Hint: That leader AIN’T the Status Quo.)

bill

January 18th, 2012
9:55 am

Im going to walmart and steal a bunch of dvd’s and books. When they try to arrest me I will say I just practicing my freedom of speech. How dare you have rules FREEDOM FREEDOM !

[...] Also, the following is a link to an article that summarizes the extent of the protest:  http://blogs.ajc.com/news-to-me/2012/01/17/thousands-of-websites-offline-wednesday-to-protest-sopa-p… [...]

bill

January 18th, 2012
10:03 am

friend of mine said this and I quote him:

If you like stealing stuff or getting stuff for free, just admit it, I don’t have a problem with that. It’s when people try to make this into some sort of complicated argument regarding business models and free speech is when it gets silly.

Maybe I just hang around honest people in real life, but everyone I know who torrents content just says they do it because it’s free. I never argue with them or even have a problem with them because at least they are being honest. If you like free stuff and there is a legal loophole to get what you want, go ahead and do it, but don’t try to make it out like doing so makes you some sort of future-savvy businessman or freedom fighter who is fighting for all of our freedom in the digital age.

If you want to fight for freedom, go ahead and do it. But torrenting the latest season of Dexter because you are too poor to afford Showtime or the DVD box set doesn’t make you the next MLK.

At least be honest with yourself. That’s really my only issues with this whole debate, the people who fool themselves into thinking they are part of something larger in order to rationalize their own theft. There are certain things I can’t afford like yachts and super cars, but if I could get them for free by stealing with no repercussion, I just might do it. But at least I would admit that I just stole them, I wouldn’t weave some convoluted Robin Hood type argument to rationalize my theft.”