Hollywood’s never-ending battle against online piracy has a new victim today — GoDaddy.com, the world’s largest registrar of Internet domains.

"The enemy has been sighted off the port bow Capt. Disney."
Everyone’s heard of GoDaddy, perhaps best known for their sexist (not sexy, as Spinal Tap might say) commercials aired during the Super Bowl featuring women in small shirts.
Thursday, opponents of the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) are boycotting GoDaddy, which was one of the few tech firms to support federal legislation that would require Internet Service Providers to block connections to torrent search engines and other sites that assist in the illegal distribution of copyrighted films, music and other content.
The boycott has already cost GoDaddy thousands of customers. One company pulled more than 1,000 domains from GoDaddy already. Still, GoDaddy controls 45 million domain names, four times more than its closest competitor, so it is unlikely elephant hunter and company founder Bob Parsons will be taking a pay cut.
The boycott threat did make GoDaddy swap sides, however.
SOPA is not a done deal. Congress is expected to take up the measure in January. It’s a political hot potato if there ever was one.
One one side of the issue you have what has been called “old media” — the politically powerful but financially faltering movie and music industry.
Opponents of SOPA read like a who’s who of the Internet. Google, Facebook, Twitter, Craigslist, eBay, Mozilla, Yahoo, AOL, and LinkedIn wrote a letter to key members of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, saying SOPA poses “a serious risk to our industry’s continued track record of innovation and job creation, as well as to our nation’s cybersecurity.”
Google co-founder Sergey Brin said Dec. 15 that SOPA would “censor search results” and put the U.S. on par with “the most oppressive nations in the world.”
Yahoo quit the U.S. Chamber of Commerce over the organization’s enthusiastic support for SOPA. Google is considering it.
So far, at least $91 million has been spent on lobbying efforts to assure SOPA’s passage, according to the non-partisan Center For Responsive Politics.
Meanwhile, viral songstress Leah Kauffman has let her feelings be known with the release of “Firewall (Don’t Let Our Government Ruin The Internets).”
What happens next? No telling, but when it comes to stopping copyright violators, perhaps that pirate ship has already sailed.
28 comments Add your comment
Mason
December 29th, 2011
1:15 pm
Maybe if the “artist” weren’t so greedy we would have to download their “work” for free.
Lulz
December 29th, 2011
1:37 pm
Mason, I think by “artist” you mean “media conglomerates.” Artists, musicians especially (unless you’re the likes of Kanye or Lady Gaga), get literally pennies for their work with studios taking the rest.
RC
December 29th, 2011
1:41 pm
This legislation is alarmingly over-inclusive and would do more harm than good. This what you can expect from industries whose lobbyists once tried to make VCRs and MP3 players illegal.
Darvoset spending
December 29th, 2011
1:45 pm
The US talks a good game about freedom and liberty, but when it comes to protecting capital, all of our supposed freedoms are pushed aside.
Please Expalin
December 29th, 2011
1:47 pm
Would someone explain to me the difference between “Pirating” a movie online and “Stealing” it off the shelf in the store? Either way someone is not getting paid for something they produced.
It does not matter what value YOU put on a movie, and I agree 99% of them are worthless, but it’s a product someone produced and they deserve protection. How is stopping you from “Stealing” is not “Censorship”
Billy
December 29th, 2011
1:49 pm
I loved napster 10 years ago, and used it, but wrong is wrong.
Material is copyrighted for a reason, to provide compensation to the artist. If they sign a deal where they get pennies, a deal’s a deal.
A dollar a song for a download is reasonable, but my preference is for older songs to cost less. Only the newer songs should go for a dollar. It’s a no sale proposition, otherwise.
Please Expalin
December 29th, 2011
1:49 pm
How is stopping you from Stealing Censorship.
Steve
December 29th, 2011
1:54 pm
Stealing is stealing. Plain and simple. Car companies are greedy Mason, does that give you the right to go steal a car off the lot and drive it around for a few weeks?
Having worked for a software firm, I can tell you that piracy affects the average people working at these companies more than the big money folks at the top. Yes, the big money folks lose money as well, but it doesn’t hurt them to go from 10 million to 9 million nearly as much as it hurts the 15-20 people who lost their job. The only other alternative is for big-wigs to drive up their prices to still turn the same profit due to lost sales .. thus hurting the average consumer.
I think it’s pathetic the way common theives make this out to be a privacy issue. You are all PATHETIC LITTLE PARASITES on society, taking from those who try to earn a living. Stop trying to make yourselves out as good people.
Gay Raul
December 29th, 2011
2:01 pm
It’s not about stealing. Read the Bill. It gives corporations broad censorship powers. Say something that Disney doesn’t like, they call you a pirate, your site goes down. Youtube could host something pirated and the whole site could go down. Under the DMCA they are protected under safe harbor rules. They’re notified that the site contains infringing material and youtube removes it. Under SOPA youtube could be shut down. This isn’t about theft. It’s another government / corporation power grab.
Mason
December 29th, 2011
2:02 pm
There is a difference from car companies marking up the sticker price by a grand to feed their families, it’s another thing to demand 25 million instead of 10 million to act. As for the music side of it that is a little different but if their music is good enough people will still pay to see them live and buy their stuff.