Palin fans trying to revise Wikipedia’s Paul Revere entry

Revisionist history is as wrong as it is fashionable, but rarely is it as obvious as on Wikipedia, where legions of Sarah Palin fans are reportedly editing the Paul Revere entry to make it match the former Alaska governor’s version of the silversmith’s famous ride.

“And many years later, the Allman Brothers wrote this great song about the whole thing called ‘Midnight Rider’.” (Hat added due to comedy)

“And many years later, the Allman Brothers wrote this great song about the whole thing called ‘Midnight Rider’.” (Hat added due to comedy)

The list of edits is telling for an event that happened 236 years ago.

One edit was removed because a Wikipedian said the new info was “not backed by a reliable sources (it was sarah palin interview videos).”

Another shows a bit of bias against the former Republican candidate for vice president of the United States: “[A newspaper] may be a reliable source, but on this Palin clearly is not.”

The Paul Revere discussion page is basically a flame war.

A Wikipedia administrator writes “if you mention Sarah Palin you’re doing it wrong. This article is about Paul Revere, a historical figure who died nearly two centuries before Sarah Palin came to prominence. She has absolutely nothing to do with the article. I would expect to see contemporary sources and theories proposed by modern historians, but Sarah Palin is neither here nor there.”

For the blissfully unaware, Palin, a potential presidential candidate in 2012, seemed to be confused when asked in Boston about the story of Paul Revere.

Palin, on a bus tour, said Revere went on his midnight ride to notify the British that they shouldn’t confiscate American weapons.

Her actual quote was something like this: “[Revere] warned the British that they weren’t gonna be takin’ away our arms, by ringing those bells, and makin’ sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be sure and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed.”

Perhaps Revere was the progenitor of the Second Amendment to the Constitution, which came about 16 years later, but I don’t recall that from the history books I’ve read.

Revere, according to history, rode through an area north of Boston in 1775 to warn residents that British forces were on the move. He didn’t really shout “The British are coming,” because, at that time, almost everyone in the area was considered “British.”

If nothing else, the U.S. public, and a few candidates it seems, will learn more about their country this election cycle.

183 comments Add your comment

left/right/whateva

June 6th, 2011
1:28 pm

mad dog, that is just ugly. george mathis cannot write about a topic unless the meat of it occurs. and btw- everyone is smarter than palin. she is doing pretty well making out like a bandit getting goobers like you to support her financially, though.

Newsflash

June 6th, 2011
1:28 pm

THIS JUST IN – Observer subpoenaed as “expert witness” for Republican Idiocy Committee hearings on making American history “fit”

Night Raider

June 6th, 2011
1:29 pm

@Observer: Revere “consulted with the British” and told them to back off. Give me a break. He was stopped and detained by a British patrol and he baffled them with BS about the colonists having an army of 500 that would arrive immenently. Since he wasn’t armed he wasn’t shot and the Brits let him go.

R. Goodden

June 6th, 2011
1:31 pm

Mr. Mathis is seemingly one of those whom the Los Angeles Times takes to task in today’s edition … for not knowing their history. When detained by the British in the course of his ride Revere actually DID warn the British that resistance to the growing revolt was futile, as correctly noted by the newspaper.

… Or does Mathis number the Times among Gov. Palin’s camp?

Dealmaker

June 6th, 2011
1:31 pm

The moronic apologist are now trying to rationalize her screw-up by claiming that the confession obtained from Revere at the point of a British pistol while being threatened with getting his brains blown out somehow substantiates her claim that he was ringing bells and shooting guns to warn the British. Palin is a disgrace. John McCain should never be forgiven for unleashing this charlatan on the gullible right wing fanatics in the country. She will lead them off a cliff where many innocent people will be hurt.

left/right/whateva

June 6th, 2011
1:31 pm

noooooo night raider, nooooo. observer is a qualified historian. we know this because he says so. observer is correct and all of history is wrong. run palin run!

Aquagirl

June 6th, 2011
1:32 pm

It’s frightening that some people want this woman to be president. But even more frighting Sarah cultists assert history expert Sairy was really trying to educate us as to the “true” reason for Paul Revere’s ride, and was tragically misunderstood by the unwashed masses.

Spin until you puke—-nobody is buying that crap.

The Real Politico

June 6th, 2011
1:32 pm

There will always be those who support anyone who agrees with their slanted view.
The facts be damn. That’s what we have here. These are the same people who said she was more qualified than Obama to be President in 2008.
Yeah, right…

North Over South

June 6th, 2011
1:34 pm

She’s an ignorant unintelligent moron and to stupid to be president what a ding bat

kkong

June 6th, 2011
1:38 pm

John McCain…I will never, ever forgive you for bringing the idiot into national prominence! And, I MEAN NEVER!