Doctor (but not of love) resigns after saying unprotected sex makes women happier

Unprotected sex makes women happier, according to the Dr. Lazar Greenfield, the once-upon-a-time incoming president of the American College of Surgeons.

Greenfield, 78,  ”shocked the medical community” by making the suggestion that  ”[semen is] a better gift … than chocolates” in a Valentine’s Day editorial.

This woman is either very happy or has recently fallen out of an airplane.

This woman is either very happy or has recently fallen out of an airplane.

Less shockingly, he has resigned his position as editor in chief of Surgery News and won’t be getting that prestigious new gig after all.

The entire online issue of the publication in which the article appeared — the official newspaper of the American College of Surgeons — was also withdrawn.

Here’s the offending text:

It’s been known since the 1990s that heterosexual women living together synchronize their menstrual cycles because of pheromones, but when a study of lesbians showed that they do not synchronize, the researchers suspected that semen played a role. In fact, they found ingredients in semen that include mood enhancers like estrone, cortisol, prolactin, oxytocin, and serotonin; a sleep enhancer, melatonin; and of course, sperm, which makes up only 1%-5%. Delivering these compounds into the richly vascularized vagina also turns out to have major salutary effects for the recipient. Female college students having unprotected sex were significantly less depressed than were those whose partners used condoms. Their better moods were not just a feature of promiscuity, because women using condoms were just as depressed as those practicing total abstinence. The benefits of semen contact also were seen in fewer suicide attempts and better performance on cognition tests.

So there’s a deeper bond between men and women than St. Valentine would have suspected, and now we know there’s a better gift for that day than chocolates.

Greenfield is certainly smart, he wrote a famous textbook on surgery and invented the Greenfield Filter, which prevents blood clots from traveling into the lungs and other places during surgery, but he’s not wise. After the editorial, instead of simply apologizing, he seemed to attack the women who were offended by his editorial in a well-read e-mail.

As for that study, many think it’s flawed, but I can’t find any refutation of the controversial conclusion online.

Still, it would be unwise to forget the chocolates, or the condoms, which the CDC seems to think are quite useful.

28 comments Add your comment

Old Geezer

April 28th, 2011
5:44 pm

Never let it be said I give bad gifts every again.

Packed in Water

April 28th, 2011
5:47 pm

As a lesbian, I call BS on this entire article and this blog on the basis that both were written by men. Try finding a man who thinks their semen isn’t a “gift” to a woman.

Rachael

April 29th, 2011
8:36 am

Just because an idea is unpopular doesn’t make it false. Perhaps more studies should be done – if semen does have these benefits, I’d like a mood-lifting-semen-substitute pill, please.

Believe me, such knowledge is not going to make a woman start having unprotected sex. Nothing is as depressing as an unplanned pregnancy or a surprise STD.

Critical Thinker

April 29th, 2011
8:52 am

I don’t know why people think the idea is BS. Thebody craves sugar and fat in order to survive, and thus procrate. Exercise releases endorphin as a motivation to keep the body in working condition. The reason sex feels good is to motivate the species to reproduce. Why wouldn’t there be a chemical agent in sexual fluids to make sure that the species procreates? I know the lesbian poster might be offended, but you can’t fight evolution. We’re made a certain way in order to survive and pass on our genes. Almost everything in our bodies is geared solely for that ourpose. That doesn’t mean you can’t control or resist it, but just because you resist, doesn’t make that fact a lie.

Kip

April 29th, 2011
9:29 am

As a physician, I don’t understand such offense to an opinion from a physician of his stature. Why can his opinion not be respected, especially when there is no marketing behind it’s suppose, whereas in so many other instances $ show seeping out of the mention? Why are we so skewed in our opinions when our moral fiber is so tainted?

Steve Padre

April 29th, 2011
9:30 am

@Packed in Water….. I don’t think my semen is a gift. In fact I wish I could turn it off in most situations.

Nature

April 29th, 2011
9:47 am

“That doesn’t mean you can’t control or resist it, but just because you resist, doesn’t make that fact a lie.”

But does make them a ding against nature.

woodrow

April 29th, 2011
10:13 am

This is very well known research. I’m not sure why it would cause a scandal at this late date. It’s kind of like saying the earth is not flat. A scientist should not have to hide in the shadows.

Michelle

April 29th, 2011
10:44 am

As a mother of 4 girls, I can refute it. My daughters, including two who were not sexually active (and I know this because my family doctor felt the need to reassure me they were virgins after their gyn exams – don’t ask me why) DID have synchronized cycles. I would suspect that this doctor may be suffering from some dementia.

Poke 'Em With a Stick

April 29th, 2011
10:54 am

A guy met a woman at the bar, after some drinks she asks him back to her place but says, “I must warn you though, I’m on my menstrual cycle.”
He said, “That’s cool, I’m on my moped, I’ll follow you.”

So many problems in this world would be solved if all the research money be concentrated on making semen taste like chocolate – Ron White