Circumcision, a tradition rooted in religious tradition, may soon be a thing of the past in San Francisco, where “civil rights advocates” are trying to ban it.
The thrust of the proposal is that circumcision poses medical risks and has little medical benefit, according to an NBC article that also alleges there’s a national push to end the procedure.
San Fran resident Lloyd Schofield is spearheading the effort to get the 7,000 signatures required to get the measure on the November ballot. Then comes the difficult part, convincing voters that snipping body parts is a bad idea.
Schofield has said he is working with a group to “end male genital mutilation in the U.S.”
“I always knew this was something wrong to do to a child,” Schofield told The San Francisco Examiner.
“Although some studies indicate that circumcision reduces the risk of STD transmission, others have indicated that the procedure is not worth the associated risks and diminished sexual function,” the NBC article says.
If the measure becomes law, those caught cutting foreskins would face a fine of $1,000 and a year in prison. Only people over the age of 18 would be allowed to have their foreskins removed, according to the NBC article.
22 comments Add your comment
BettyLouMay
February 23rd, 2011
1:27 pm
I don’t like the look of an uncircumcised penis, and it comes down to what I want to look at when I change my kids’ diapers and I don’t want that looking back at me.
JoanneG
February 23rd, 2011
9:10 pm
Ewwwww! Penises are SO nasty!
Mike Thorne
February 23rd, 2011
10:00 pm
I will never forgive my mother for circumcising me. I have always felt like a part of me was missing. Since my teens I have to wear a synthetic foreskin made of flexible plastic over my penis just to feel normal. I shouldn’t have to do this!
Frank
February 23rd, 2011
10:24 pm
I don’t remember being circumcised so I’m sure it’s fine to do. Ain’t no woman has ever complained about my junk.
RedNeck Rick
February 24th, 2011
7:11 am
I have a dream that one day this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: “We will not dick around with people’s dicks!”
BThumper
February 24th, 2011
7:35 am
No surprise here. Circumcision is practiced by Jews and most Christians. When the Nazis rampaged all over Europe the first thing they did to pick out the Jews was to hold a “short arm inspection”. US diplomats had a hard time convincing the Nazis that most US males were circumcised @ birth. Circumcision is the choice of the parent and not the State.
HoodedPeen
February 24th, 2011
8:57 am
I have a very large uncircumcised penis. I have never had any girls ever say anything about it (of course they are usually drunk and probably didn’t notice anyway), but I always get tons of compliments on my “skillz” in the bed. My point is, I enjoy better sex than the circ’d men. I just want to thank my mom and dad (whoever you are) for not cutting off part of my dick.
Ryan
February 24th, 2011
1:51 pm
I’ll agree with this, conditionally, If you outlaw circumcisions before 18, outlaw tattoos and all piercings before 18 also. If we are actually concerned about non-adult physical “mutilation”, and yes this does include ears.
Ryan
February 24th, 2011
1:53 pm
that includes with parental permission, because, apparently parents can’t be trusted
jack
February 24th, 2011
2:05 pm
Im am so glad that I’m cut, Im a nurse and Ive seen and have to insert catheter at times, eww, so gross, maybe ok when ure young but when ure older??? gotta scrape those cream cheese!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! yuck!