Good touch, bad touch: How to explain TSA pat-downs to kids?

If you’re getting ready to travel with your kids for Thanksgiving you may want to have a little discussion about pat-downs before you arrive at the airport security line.

We spend a good portion of our parenting time telling our children not to let strangers touch them, yet they may have to allow a stranger (in theory with good intentions) pat them down if they want to fly to see Grandma.

Babble.com picked up from the LA Times explanations of the TSA rules involving screenings and pat-downs: (There is more info on the LA Times link.)

“1. A child under 12 who opts out of the body scanner will undergo “a modified pat-down search.” Children over 12 who opt out of the body scanner get the regular pat-down. Citing security reasons, the TSA has declined to say what the modified pat-down entails.

2. If an alarm goes off during a screening (as with the aforementioned 3-year-old), even children under 12 will be subject to a full pat-down.

3. To prepare kids, explain the procedures they may encounter ‘including the possibility that they may be touched by TSA personnel as part of a pat-down. Parents won’t necessarily be with their kids as they pass through the scanner or get patted down,’ according to The Los Angeles Times.

4. You might also check out the TSA’s advanced imaging technology web page to show your kids what the full-body scan entails.”

Here is more information on traveling with kids though the safety checkpoints from the TSA.

Here is more information on pat-downs and body scans in general, as well as holiday travel, from the TSA main Web page.

Here is the latest statement from the TSA Administrator John S. Pistole.

I have never been patted-down at the airport but Rose was when she was a 1-year-old at a small airport in Colorado. It was a little more than a year after 9/11. I just remember them patting down her diaper and we kind of thought it was funny at the time. I guess if she was older and aware of them doing it I wouldn’t haven’t been chuckling.  In fact, now that she’s developing if anybody tried to touch her I would probably go ballistic. I’m glad I’m not flying for the holidays.

So what do you think: Should the TSA be patting down kids? Would you rather them go through the full-body scans or be patted down? Will you have a discussion about the pat-downs prior to flying? What’s your plan if it happens?

- by Theresa Walsh Giarrusso, Momania blog

141 comments Add your comment

Elizabeth Hayes

November 22nd, 2010
1:00 am

Absolutely not. No. No way. Nope.

Theresa Walsh Giarrusso

November 22nd, 2010
1:03 am

You won’t explain it or you won’t let them be patted-down?

Annie Norton

November 22nd, 2010
1:12 am

There will be no TSA groping of my children. Ever.

We will not be flying until this policy is officially ended.

runningman

November 22nd, 2010
1:14 am

It is interesting that a country like Israel who is in the middle of conflict and who surrounded by nations who would like t destroy it does not subject its airline passengers to the same degrading tactics as the TSA. What does that say about the TSA and homeland security?

freedom

November 22nd, 2010
1:14 am

Why should anyone have to be patted down?

I understand security. I knew several 9/11 victims’ families. I know the risk and the threat.

But, if we keep taking security up and up and up (from shoes off to coats off to pat downs to full body scanners), we’re letting the terrorists win by instilling fear in our country and taking our liberties away. By no means am I suggesting to remove all security, but to remember that there’s a risk in any medium, but that doesn’t mean we should be subjected to an increasingly intrusive search. Where does it stop? Sign me up for a full body scan or x-ray or what have you, but I draw the line at touching– especially when it involves children. Let them be scanned and unaware (but tell the parents).

cara

November 22nd, 2010
1:16 am

I am completely opting out of all flying until this invasive, anti-American and violation of the 4th amendment is done away with. how about we go defeat the enemy? or try profiling? Can’t take their efforts seriously if they won’t profile. And are they screening cargo carefully? I think not. And yet the people, like sheep, tolerate this.

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by srdjan basaric, AJCMOMania, TSAagent, infotectravel1, ajcparenting and others. ajcparenting said: AJC's Momania blog: Good touch, bad touch: How to explain TSA pat downs to kids? http://bit.ly/d4F8ad [...]

lula

November 22nd, 2010
1:25 am

So I am supposed to explain to my kids that it is perfectly ok for this person to touch them? seriously? have you lost your mind? Why are we getting our kids used to pat downs? I don’t understand this at all. I fly with my children monthly but this has to stop. The moment someone gives my child an invasive pat down is the moment I will need a lawyer. It is too important, I work so hard to teach them that their body is theirs, people should respect that their “private parts” are private etc etc I am NOT going to have it screwed up. I was sexually assaulted, I am not going to back down on this philosophy. How are people ok with this? This advice is ridiculous, tell my children that this is ok.

Should I tell them the truth, here it is in language for my 2 year old who freaks if strangers touch him when he is tense. Here goes…. you have to be scanned, it will be a naked picture of you, don’t worry only this person who doesn’t know you will see it. If you set off an alarm for any reason this stranger is going to touch you in ways that mommy tells you is not ok, in ways that even your doctor has to ask you about and listen if you say no and the entire time mommy can’t touch you, if you say no they won’t stop and if mommy makes them stop we can’t fly, have to pay money and mommy will have to talk to the police or maybe go to jail? If I can’t tell my kid the truth I am not going to do it. I am fine telling them about bad people who blow up planes, bombs and terrorism because that is about bad people doing bad things. I will not tell them about situations where they have to have invasive things happen because we are scared of bad people.

Dan

November 22nd, 2010
1:38 am

There is NO WAY me or my kids are going to be put through this ridiculous invasion of privacy. It’s simple, I just won’t fly until they stop this knee-jerk policy that doesn’t solve anything. Trains, busses, cars and boats are all viable alternatives. I’ll trade a little bit of time to avoid this throwback to the middle ages!

T. Picarro

November 22nd, 2010
1:43 am

No one should be patted up and down or x-rayed without probble cause. This issue will probably have to be confronted in a court of law. I have a right to travel without this intrusion. And even worse is to come. Will a woman wearing a sanitary napkin have to endure even worse treatment? Will the lying Janet Napolitano decide that train and bus travelers must also go through these procedures? And my next question is how many terrorists have been stopped by TSA employees?

Michele

November 22nd, 2010
1:46 am

We’re not explaining it because it’s simply not going to happen. I’m not going to explain that this kind of touching is okay because it’s absolutely not.

We’re driving 17-23 hours to see my parents instead of flying as there are scanners on both ends – and our destination airport is SAN. We fly at least 6 round trips a year but we’ll either have to be more creative with airports or stop flying altogether if this is not changed. We recently picked up an annual pass for national parks, seeing we’ll drive close to 10-15 of them during our trip. Trying to see the bright side here…

Connie

November 22nd, 2010
1:58 am

If anyone touches my children’s private parts I will call 911 and have them arrested for child molestation. The head of the TSA should be fired immediately.

Connie

November 22nd, 2010
2:04 am

Please call 911 and report all TSA child molesters.
In school the government has taught our children that NO ONE should EVER touch them in areas that their bathing suit covers.

Andy Richter

November 22nd, 2010
2:14 am

I still cannot understand why someone would choose to get patted down as opposed to going through the machines. I would rather someone see my junk than touch my junk.

Andy Richter

November 22nd, 2010
2:15 am

If you sent your child through the machine, nobody will have to touch them. Enough said. Everyone needs to think for once. Sheesh.

Robert

November 22nd, 2010
2:18 am

Wake up people. There are no terrorists. This is all being done in an effort to instill fear upon you so you give up more of your constitutional rights and civil liberties. Your children will grow up thinking that it’s ok for the government to illegally search you, touch your private parts, enter your house and take your property. See this for what it is: a slow, generational conditioning of the masses to be so afraid that they beg for more security. Why do you think it’s so necessary to subject children to it?

Opt-out of TSA x-ray scans which mutate your cells and call for law enforcement if you or your child are inappropriately touched. Better yet, don’t fly. You have a choice in airports, don’t use those who have the scanners and/or use the TSA for screening. Boycott the airlines until they life this insane insane policy.

leeloo

November 22nd, 2010
2:24 am

@Andy Richter: yes, because irradiating children – whose bodies are especially sensitive to radiation – is a brilliant alternative. To say nothing of a stranger taking an essentially nude photo of them.

The idea that these kids need this procedure explained to them is ludicrous. Any parent who subjects their children to either one of these procedures is off their rocker. I don’t care where they have to go in such a hurry – it is insane.

Annie Norton

November 22nd, 2010
2:30 am

When you consider the dangers of long-distance road travel and the comments from those who say that they’d rather subject their children to that instead of violation of body integrity, you begin to get an idea of just how seriously the TSA’s invasion of privacy is taken.

Ironically, the TSA’s policies will almost certainly end up killing people- not from cancers by exposure to scanner radiation, but in traffic accidents, where drivers pulling 15 hour roadtrips fall asleep at the wheel.

DB

November 22nd, 2010
2:40 am

I don’t know — how DO you explain to a child that “Gee, every person around you is a potential terrorist who would take great joy in blowing you to smithereens while you are flying, so because there are so many 5 year old terrorists in the world walking around with bombs, YOU have to let a perfect stranger feel you all over to make sure you aren’t a bad person. But don’t worry, the chances of a bad person being on our flight are pretty low, since there are SOO many terrorists flying to Cleveland . . . meanwhile, don’t trust ANYONE, because everyone is a bad person.”

Or, my version:

“This is an example of what happens when governmetn runs amuck, and overreacts by slamming the barn door shut after the horse has run away.”

Profiling, anyone? I mean, yeah, there are so many WASP 30 year old women carrying 3 year old bombers . . .

But the TSA chief is starting to back off on the intrusive searches. As with many frequent travelers, I’ve learned to dress appropriately before going through security — jewelry, no belts, slip-off shoes or sandals, etc. The thing that has made me the maddest about airlines charging for a bag these days is that it makes security lines SOO much longer because everyone is cramming steamer trunks into the overhead compartments. If I were the baggage handler union, I’d be suing the flight attendants union for job encroachment! Usually, if I wanted to bring my favorite lotions and shampoo, I’d just check the luggage and not worry about security. Not anymore . . .

My daugher was on the TSA “hit list” for several years — or, someone with her name was. I would always bring her passport with me when we flew, because checking her in usually took an extra 15 minutes while they went to research her, Yeah, that 10 year old wearing a Backstreet Boys t-shirt and a Walkman looked pretty damn dangerous to me, too . . . I finally had to call my congressman and get her off the list. It took almost six months. Sheesh!

I have very little patience with encroachment on civil liberties such as freedom of movement. Yes, I know I can move in other ways. But gee, there was a car bomb in Times Square — did that mean that anyone buying a CAR now is a suspected terrorist? There is a fine line between safety and intrusiveness — and the TSA has crossed it. Innocent until proven guilty is the law of the land, everywhere except TSA, where you are guilty until proven innocent.

I don’t feel safe, warm and happy after going thru security. I feel PISSED.

DB

November 22nd, 2010
2:43 am

One last thing: I had to laugh outloud when one of the pilots who objected to the intrusive searches pointed out, quite reasonably — “Hey, we don’t NEED a bomb, we can steer the darn plane anywhere we want to,.”

Thus proving that, in the case of the TSA, common sense isn’t that common . . .

Tara

November 22nd, 2010
2:47 am

You’re exactly right, Robert. It’s the Overton Window in motion! (FYI: At any given moment, the “window” includes a range of policies considered to be politically acceptable in the current climate of public opinion, which a politician can recommend without being considered too “extreme” or outside the mainstream to gain or keep public office. Overton arranged the spectrum on a vertical axis of “more free” and “less free” in regards to government intervention. When the window moves or expands, ideas can accordingly become more or less politically acceptable. The degrees of acceptance[3] of public ideas can be described roughly as:

Unthinkable
Radical
Acceptable
Sensible
Popular
Policy

This is where WE THE PEOPLE MUST put a stop to the politicians telling US what WE have to endure. I’m reminded of the days before the Nazi Germans required Jews to wear arm bands.
Also, we’re suppose to believe that the SAME government controlling agencies who said margarine was far better for us than butter, and fat is bad for us, and there is no safe radiation level, now say “Well, actually, this is the safe kind of radiation because it’s soooo low.” Where’s their proof on that? We’re not even ASKED if we have foul intentions, but first ASSUMED to have by being put under such scrupulous and invasive and ILLEGAL searches. I say, profiling is best. And if some unfortunate person even looks like a Muslim and gets extra security attention and he is innocent, he should chalk it up to doing a service for the USA who either, allowed him to be here in the first place, or proud to be an American. And if he has evil intent, tough luck for him–aw shucks, he got caught. I like the Israeli way, profile. Or better yet, create a step-through enclosed machine which detonates any bombs on contact. No trials to deal with there. Saves money. Seriously, people–WE the USA citizens of this GREAT country MUST NOT YIELD! The current administration WANTS us to NOT travel; wants us to succumb to this invasion of privacy. This involves a very BIG picture, not just the choice of flying vs bus or car. It’s very similar to Obama’s tactics of invading our Second Amendment rights-the right to bear arms. He can’t take the guns away (YET), but he sure knows how to limit the use/ownership by limiting the purchase ability of ammunition. God bless America–we sure need HIM!

VZ

November 22nd, 2010
3:01 am

Watch the videos all over the web, read the stories all over the web, see the pictures all over the web. Don’t go visit grandma this year, or for the sake of your children, drive or take a bus or train.
Chilren under 12 are being subjected to the pat down. Children are being held steady while the TSA gropes them, and in some cases removes their clothing.
Children over 12 do not need their newly budding pubescent bodies groped and manhandled by STRANGERS in the airport.
Please please please think before putting your children through this.
Consider the looks on their faces when a stranger touches them in ways they have always been told are bad touches, and would be bad touches coming from anyone else at all.
And please look up examples of the images those scanners produce. They are so clear you can see parts of the human anatomy that people would get arrested for exposing in public. Do you really want images like that, of your children, seen by ANYONE?
What are you willing to put your children through “in the name of safety”?
Men, women (even pregnant ones), children of all ages, cancer survivors, people with disabilities… no one is safe from the humiliation and assaults from the TSA.
Protect yourself and your children, DO NOT FLY until the scanners are removed and policies are changed

aj

November 22nd, 2010
4:17 am

No way. My children and I will not be flying until they change this policy.

DOPES

November 22nd, 2010
4:43 am

AN EVEN BETTER THAN PERFECT REASON FOR A BOYCOTT OF AIR TRAVEL.

Perfect the imaging technology so that flesh isn’t visible & dangerous items are still detected or stop these violations of the Constitution.

There is no excuse for this addition. Check people at border gateway airports & leave interior alone.

Mercedes Lackey

November 22nd, 2010
5:45 am

Considering that there have been at least 3 people discovered to be pedophiles hired by TSA, there is no such thing as a “good TSA touch.”

Furthermore, these “TSA agents” DO NOT CHANGE THEIR GLOVES. They run their hands all over dirty shoes, diaper bags, and then stick them down the pants of people whose urostomy bag they just broke. Then stick the same gloves down YOUR pants and grope your “sensitive areas.”

But it’s that, or increase your risk for cancer.

I’m not flying.

john

November 22nd, 2010
6:12 am

This has to stop. Kids under 12 are exempt from sexually abusive pat downs. TSA forgot that 13-17 year olds are still minors, so kids in this age group will be molested and scarred for the rest of their lives. Pistole and Obama should both have their kids “patted down” by TSA screeners then once their private areas are touched this madness will end immediately.

Jeff

November 22nd, 2010
7:20 am

If you want to “grab my junk”, as the popluar saying goes, I’m going to charge YOU a fee.

Seriously, this has gone far enough. I won’t be flying and I can imaging this is going to hurt the airline industry’s business. I used to travel for business, pre-9/11, and I feel sorry for that group now.

Tairy Greene

November 22nd, 2010
7:57 am

I need to get me a job with TSA. hopefully they won’t run a background check.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
8:00 am

I fly all the time, as many of you know. It is something I have to do, if I want to stay in business.
Obviously, I cannot drive to Montana for the weekend and do a meeting.

Going through the security line and unloading everything is a real pain in the neck There is NO consistency to this procedure and some little airports seemingly would check the crud under your fingernails. If the big airports did this ( to everyone) we would never get on the plane.

One thing to remember, this is the government and NOT necessarily the airlines. Neal Boortz was all over this last week and he said THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE AIRLINES….it is our government. He is a pilot and also a lawyer, so in my book…he knows more than many of the rest of us about this topic.

To me, this is kinda like when they banned smoking in restaurants in Gwinnett County and if those who smoke said I WILL NOT EAT A A RESTAURANT …I WILL PUNISH THE RESTAURANTS FOR ALLOWING THIS. Did the restaurants choose to do this? NO IT WAS OUR GOVERNMENT.

I am laughing at those who say they will raise cane on Wednesday…one of the busiest days of travel and perhaps one where more NON BUSINESS travelers are flying. Guess what…you may not be going to Grandma’s if you pitch a fit and miss your flight as the airlines cannot accommodate everyone whenever they feel like showing up. Even if you are obeying the seemingly ridiculous rules and the majority of those say in Detroit are not…if the airline holds their plane to get THEM on board, it would be late here to Atlanta and then late to perhaps miss your connection Salt Lake City and then you will not make it to say Idaho.

I have learned that airline passengers are often thinking only about themselves and not the others who also have itineraries.

I laughed once at a neighbor passenger who was ranting and raving when we pulled into Hartsfield as our flight was late and he feared he would miss his connection. We sat on the tarmac and waited, in line to get to the gates. We pulled toward the gates and he was yelling…
“I see all sorts of places….just pull in and park…”

REALLY? I told him that this was not WAL MART and that those gates are assigned. Passengers inside the gate were told to go to that gate to GET ON OUR PLANE. There is a method to the madness! Airplanes do not just pull in to whatever seems close or available nor do they whip over to take off whenever a passenger is screaming directions to the pilot.

To those who prefer to drive to Grandmas…please do.

FYI…this is not the card I use but if you use the Delta American Express, it allows you to check one bag for FREE for each of 6 people who fly on the same ticket. That translates into 6 people times $50 r/t for checked baggage FOR FREE. If you fly Delta and with your family, this is a perk you may need to know about. Or, I think you can fly with no baggage fee on Southwest. I am Medallion, so I do not have to pay for bags but thought I would mention it to those who still would travel and wanted to save money.

FACTS for me…air travel is a pain….I have to do it to stay in business…many other folks are in the same boat…not much I can do about it if I want to stay employed….

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
8:06 am

TWG…my comment is gone

MaryT

November 22nd, 2010
8:07 am

My kids are 12. Are they under 12 or over 12? But seriously, my husband said our flying days are over and I am with him on that. The TSA has gone entirely too far. If anybody touches my kids like that, that person better look out for “mama bear”.

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
8:08 am

Agreed with Annie: there will be NO GROPING of my children EVER. I will not fly till they change this. Period.

I am NOT gonna start amending the rules that I have teaching them their whole lives: No one touches any area that would be covered by a swimsuit. Only exceptions are mom, dad, or doctor. End of story. And overweight, underpaid, undertrained, uneducated TSA agent with a power trip does not make the cut.

I am whatever you say I am

November 22nd, 2010
8:16 am

I concur with Annie Norton.
Though I want to fly , I don’t think I will be doing so until this policy has ended.
In the past, when I was pregnant I opted for the pat down to avoid the X-Ray Scanners and the method that I went thru was less advasive.
I feel now though, with the new regulations, TSA agents are go ho and taking it to another level.
I think that this is really blown way out of poportion.
Why don’t we work on the issue of planes having to revert back to Atlanta due to some sort of Mechanical.
Every other day, Delta is usually the colprit.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
8:22 am

@ I am…or Delta could just fly the broken planes and see what happens…maybe the folks on the plane from NYC to Moscow would have preferred that yesterday. Do you fly every other day?
I flew about once a week, from September 8 until November 7 and this never happened to me during that time period.

That issue would actually be one for the airlines not TSA or our government.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-11-22/moscow-bound-delta-plane-lands-at-jfk-after-engine-shutdown.html

Jeff

November 22nd, 2010
8:30 am

So if Ray McBerry does it, it is illegal – but if TSA does it, it is legal???

As I said on my site last week: I am the only person who gets to see my wife nude. PERIOD.

When it comes to kids, I’ll show these guys Muslim mercy: If you touch my kids, I will cut your hand off – and if I don’t have a blade on me, I’ll RIP it off.

I’m not one normally prone to advocate violence or even lawsuits, but this has to stop – by any means necessary. If ANYONE takes a picture of you nude without your explicit consent, they have committed sexual assault. If ANYONE touches you in your genitals without your explicit consent, they have committed sexual assault. If ANYONE does these things to your kids, they have committed any of a number of felonies, including sexual assault of a child, sexual exploitation of a child, statutory rape, and many others. Cops should be called and the criminals should be hauled off to jail – no matter WHO they work for.

Cammi317

November 22nd, 2010
8:51 am

What Annie Norton said…No way, no how. My daughter turns 13 the day after Christmas, so I guess our flying days are over.

justmy2cents

November 22nd, 2010
8:55 am

Here is my comment from the travel blog regarding this:So all you have to do is board a plane from an airport that does not have these scanners, and connect through Atlanta, and voila, you can avoid these “precautions” and “security” measures. You can still blow up anything you please. Nice. And since everyone is not scanned with these, or the pat downs, you are not ensuring security at all….sooooo, umm, wtf is the point? C4 will not set off a metal detector and you can breeze right through. Why not save all the money on TSA and scanners and invest in drug & explosive sniffing dogs? At least they can’t steal stuff out of your bags while you are not looking.

So, from a parenting aspect….NO, I will not let this happen to my children, and I certainly will explain the idiocy of this to them and how it is a violation of their rights.

DCMommy

November 22nd, 2010
9:01 am

“If you sent your child through the machine, nobody will have to touch them.”

Andy – That is NOT true. The article states that if they see something on the machine, the child will then be subject to a FULL patdown, regardless of age (not just the modified ones that they get for opting out). So it makes more sense to go ahead and opt your child out, so they can get a modified patdown (whatever that is). Otherwise, you get your child microwaved and then there’s STILL a chance they could get a FULL patdown afterwards! How STUPID!

Like most parents, I’ve been teaching my 3 year old about good touch/bad touch. And it’s a difficult concept for them to grasp. You have to keep repeating the lesson. I’ve drilled it into her that only 2 people can touch her private area – me and the doctor. Period. End of story. So now, what? I have to add “government employee with rubber gloves” to that? This gets very slippery. My daughter gets upset when we talk about this; she’s a very inquisitive child. “Who would touch me there, mommy? Why?”

Look folks, I’m a veteran. I served in the middle east after 9/11. My husband serves and has been to Iraq twice and is preparing to head to Afghanistan for a year. I get it. 9/11 still continues to impact my family in a very, very direct way.

But I’m drawing the line. And I’m drawing it here.

We cancelled our flight plans for Christmas. We will either stay put, or drive.

Jeff

November 22nd, 2010
9:08 am

BTW: Its crap like this that actually makes me GLAD I live in the middle of nowhere (Albany Ga). At least in Albany, I’m 3 hrs from my parents and 3 hrs from her grandparents – the two places we go for holidays, though in opposite directions.

On the bright side, maybe people will start getting more time off/out of school for the holidays again, to allow for driving time?

lakerat

November 22nd, 2010
9:12 am

First of all, you or your child will have to set off the metal detector before being subjected to either the pat down or the scanner – so, why all the consternation about something that may not even be done to you or your child? I have been patted down, scanned and waned for the past 12 years – ever since my first knee replacement surgery. And I will continue to be “handled” since I have these artificial joints to carry me around for the rest of my life.

I was one of the first to be “groped” (as many of you are calling it) a couple of weeks ago when the new process started and the scanner was broken at the Atlanta airport. Nobody grabbed me inappropriately or fondled anything – most of you are making rash judgments and do not understand the process AT ALL – seems like many have taken TWG’s phobias to heart and are afraid of everything that MIGHT happen…

Cindy Davis

November 22nd, 2010
9:27 am

My 4 yr old daughter was randomly singled out by security in Dallas in 2003 for a wand search. I had to stand 10 feet away from her, but I could talk to her and tell her it was ok and that it was like a game. I would have been FURIOUS if the agent had actually touched her by hand! TSA needs to perform quality background checks on its agents, provide more than adequate training, and use different methods such as profiling. Four year old white girls are not hijacking airplanes.

Susan Manning

November 22nd, 2010
9:33 am

I think it is scary if you don’t explain it to your child. I don’t think that you need to get into weapon types and bad people!
I think that these procedures keep us safe. Yes, they are intrusive but it’s better than being blown up. There are terrorists in our world. TSA isn’t doing this for fun.
Susan Manning
parentusacity.com

Mary

November 22nd, 2010
9:33 am

I won’t be flying again for a very long time, if ever.

I wonder, though, will they down Muslim women in Burkas????? I think that penalty is death isn’t it?

Mary

November 22nd, 2010
9:34 am

Will they *pat* down Muslim women?

Easy

November 22nd, 2010
9:34 am

Just don’t opt out of the body scan. It’s not like these things are x-ray specs.

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
9:37 am

Susan: NO, they are NOT keeping us safe. All this is doing is giving us a fall sense of security. Next time, the terrorists will just shove an explosive in their butts. So what’s next? Cavity searches??? NO!!

We have to draw the line here! We have NO freedoms worth protecting if we are giving up our dignity and privacy.

From Neal Boortz today...

November 22nd, 2010
9:38 am

“Someone tried to blow up an airliner wearing explosive underwear. So .. we’re going to step up security to make sure someone else doesn’t try this and get away with it.”

“What are you going to do?”

“Every time someone sets off a metal detector we’re going to give them an enhanced pat down.”

“What’s an enhanced pat down?”

“That’s where we run our hands over virtually every square inch of their body.”

“Will that tell you what set off the metal detector?”

“No. It won’t. We’re looking for a non-metallic explosive, so we’re not really concerned with what set off the metal detector.”

“Then why do you concentrate your groping – and that’s what it is – on people who set off metal detectors?”

“Because they set off the metal detectors, you moron!”

“But you’re looking for something non-metallic,right?

“Yeah. That’s why we run our hands all over them.”

“But what if they have some bomb .. and it’s made of metal .. but it’s hidden inside a body cavity or something. Why, it might ever be surgically implanted!”

“Why would anyone do that? That would be terribly painful and uncomfortable.”

“What do they care? They’re going to kill themselves anyway!”

“Well, that’s just not part of our security protocol right now.”

“What about those wands? You could use those wands to locate the metal, couldn’t you?

“We don’t use those any more.”

“Why not?”

“Because we’re looking for non-metallic explosives.”

“But you search everyone who sets off the metal detector, right?”

“Yes.”

“And at the end of that search you have no idea in the world what set off the metal detector, right?”

“That’s right, we don’t.”

“If you were trying to get a non-metallic explosive on to an airliner, would you try to make sure you didn’t set off the metal detector so you wouldn’t get searched?”

“Of course!”

“Then doesn’t that make it more likely that the person who is carrying that bomb is the one who is walking right on by while you’re pawing a woman with a hip replacement that set off the metal detector?”

“Maybe.”

“But you’re not paid to think, are you? You’re just do what you’re told and grab your lunchbox at the end of the day and head home, right?”

catlady

November 22nd, 2010
9:39 am

I am glad my daughter got married in Puerto Rico LAST Christmas, because I would not have been happy about this.

Folks, I am afraid we “asked” for this. We have ceded so many of our rights over the last 20 years or so, it’s hard to stop a train moving downhill with few whimpers. (secret courts, no-knock warrants, monitoring of our phone/email conversations, waterboarding, holding people without charges, and on and on). It is hard to un-ring the bell.

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
9:39 am

Easy: so the govt is assuring us that those x-rays are safe. Guess what, they used to think that Agent Orange was safe too.

For the record: I am a flaming liberal, but this has just simply gone too far! Racial profiling should be the way to go. Period. The israelis do this and they have no issues with terrorists.

justmy2cents

November 22nd, 2010
9:42 am

Easy- the safety of them is not known…PLUS as graphic as these images are, what stops the TSA from taking cell phone pics? They are equipped with ethernet connection (WHY???), and I am sure there is probably a usb port on there for them to d/l to flash drive. If she is on her period, is she going to get singled out because a dumb TSA agent can’t figure out the different between a pad and/or tampon and a concealed explosive device?

Just bring in the friggin’ bomb/drug sniffing dogs. Again I say…since EVERYONE is not subjected to the same screening process; security is not guaranteed AT ALL, and it is too easy to circumvent. If everyone is so gung ho to give up their rights, this is indeed a scary world we live in. This is not the country I fought for and defended when I was in the service. Ughh, disgusting.

DCMommy

November 22nd, 2010
9:42 am

“First of all, you or your child will have to set off the metal detector before being subjected to either the pat down or the scanner”

laker – This is NOT true. The metal detectors are being phased out. The scanners are going to be replacing them. Right now, most airports don’t have enough of the scanners, so they are using both. But the idea is that the metal detectors are going away. It will be the body scanners and the pat-downs. Period. And if they see anything on the scanner, the individual gets a full pat-down, regardless of age.

They are still in the phase-in period, so if you traveled a few weeks ago, it is possible that you did not get the new and “improved” pat-down procedure. A family member of mine also had a knee replacement and is used to the pat-down process every time he flies. He flew out of Dallas this weekend and said the new pat-down is MUCH more intrusive.

Once it is completely phased in at all airports, everyone will have two choices – scanning or full pat-down. Some airports are still lagging behind others, especially smaller airports.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
9:48 am

According to the local news and the TSA last night, at Hartsfield you’ll only get the “extra” scanning if you don’t clear the regular x-ray machines. I know this is in conflict with what the article says, but it’s what I heard on 11 Alive at 11:30 last night. If you refuse the scan -then you get the pat down. So have your kid scanned IF he or she doesn’t clear the x-ray. If you or your kids don’t set off the regular x-ray -no problem. Here’s a good idea -make sure they don’t have metal on them. It’s not that hard to do with little kids. Also, be very clear about the “pictures” the scanners take. The only people who would be able to get off on these are those turned on by strangely alien-looking, hairless, white, blob-shaped people. Not that pervs with this exact fetish don’t exist somewhere, but chances are it’s a pretty niche group and they’re not working as TSA officers.

@runningman and others -while it would be GREAT to be able to do security like Israel, it is simply not possible in a nation this size with this much air traffic. Israel’s airport is slightly behind the Cincinnati/Kentucky airport in numbers of travelers per year. When you fly out of Israel, you are interviewed for 20-30 minutes by a HIGHLY TRAINED (and somewhat intelligent) security officer. They ask you all sorts of questions -some quite strange (to you) -because they know what can and will set off certain “signals” in subversive people. They won’t hesitate to hold you, make you miss your flight, etc. while they up the interview process to the next level. That’s all fantastic, except it would completely shut down air travel in the USA. Can you imagine this process at Hartsfield or O’Hare for EVERY SINGLE PERSON? Plus, you have to have security officers who are intelligent and well-trained. That means higher paid officers and thousands more of them. It also means that you can’t have our current level of TSA officer who chose between airport security or working the drive through window at Burger King. What I would love to hear is what Israel would do for security if they had as many air travelers as we do. How would they go about running effective screening?

I just find all the hysteria QUITE ironic, since the most out-of-sorts folks are the SAME people who were so gung-ho for the Patriot Act to be instituted. Guess what folks -that little piece of legislation opened the gateway for this kind of BS. Most of you are also the same people who would freak out and be foaming at the mouth about “lax” security measures if a plane got blown to bits or crashed into another building. No, I don’t like it -although the scanners really don’t bother me at all. Look at some REAL pictures of what the person looking sees -I don’t see a problem. You’re receiving so much daily radiation from your microwaves and cell phones that to flip out because you think these scanners are going to give you cancer is pathetic.

As far as my kids (or myself) and pat downs -if someone refuses the scanner or obviously has something in their crotch that shows up on it -then sorry, they NEED to be patted down -intimately! If you refuse -I think that should be your right, but you don’t get to fly. If you refuse the scan -that’s a BIG red flag. For all they know you have the barrel of a pistol stuck somewhere VERY interesting and the handle in the crotch of your underwear. As far as children go -they should be able to do a regular pat-down and be fine with it. YOU can tell your kids that in order for everyone to fly safely and no bad guys to bring anything on the plane, that the officer is going to touch them down the sides of their bodies and the insides of their arms and legs. Tell them it’s okay because you are right there, but if anyone ever touches them like that when you’re not around -it’s NOT okay! I do draw the line at the breast cupping and genital groping for kids (although I do think diapers should be checked with a “look” like you would check for pee or poop -just pull the front and back of the diaper out an have a peek),and it should only be done by same-gender officers. All of you SHOULD realize though that there are boys in Al Quada camps who are 12 and 14. Suicide bombers obviously don’t care if they kill children. The 9-11 terrorists obviously weren’t concerned about killing any kids in buildings or on planes. Once someone’s brain crosses into the “terrorist” category -they will send their kid on a flight with a bomb strapped to them. They simply DO NOT CARE. We can’t give free passes to children, old people and pregnant women. Google “Hindawi Affair” for a good reason why! Also -2 weeks ago the Asian guy who disguised himself as an old white man breezed through security with no problems.

I’m not gung-ho for this kind of security. I’m more of a libertarian than anything and do not like government invading my private space, BUT when I buy a plane ticket and get on a plane, I’m basically saying that I will submit to the rules and regulations of the TSA and the airline I’m flying. I think terrorists will blow up a plane if they really want to blow up a plane, but some of the “lesser-thinking” of them can be caught and disaster prevented by extremely tight airport security -and part of that means they need to know if you’re hiding anything on your “person.”

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
9:54 am

JATL: so no, I won’t be buying a plane ticking and submitting to this illegal process. And I hope that enough like minded people to the same and start applying pressure to the idiots that are the “front lines” of TSA. Have you SEEN them??? I wouldn’t trust them to guard my dog house, let alone the security of this country.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
9:56 am

@ from Neal Boortz today…last week he said this:

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH THE AIRLINES

I mentioned this is my previous post, which was deleted and not yet restored by TWG.

Neal Boortz is both a pilot and an attorney, so he may just know more about this that many others.

FACT our government is trying to control us in more ways than one.

Did anyone see the guest Rabbi on Glenn Beck last week? I do not usually watch the show but the discussion by the Rabbi on stones and bricks for the Tower of Babel was absolutely fascinating. He was showing how history repeats itself and that our government is trying to make us all into little bricks, so that we all look alike and think alike. We are no longer going to be stones…shaped differently and with different strengths to contribute to society. I was more than intrigued. I learned a lot and it was fascinating.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
10:01 am

@JATL…your long post is in today and my earlier post is OUT…too funny! I hope TWG will let mine back in. Yes, I will still fly or I will be unemployed….not much of a choice for me.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
10:04 am

I have a 4yo daughter and a 2yo daughter. I work for an airline but there will be no flying for us as a family until this policy is banned. And that’s sad because my oldest likes to fly. She enjoys going to the airport and looking out at the planes and getting a window seat. But no way will I allow them to go through a scanner without me and heck no, some random person (TSA or not) is going to pat them down.

I would imagine you’d have crying babies all day at the security check point. For those that feel this is okay, there should probably be a seperate line for parents, especially at Hartsfield.

I on the other hand would probably go through the scanner. I’ve never had a full body pat down and I don’t want one quite frankly. I haven’t committed a crime ever and don’t plan to. I value my life and freedom too much to do so.

Although I’m not for this new policy, I do understand the measures. You want to be sure that passengers are safe. That our country is safe. But government allows these people to come here and start a life. I’m a married, American born woman with two children. I work. I pay my taxes. I’ve never harmed a soul and have no intention. I don’t deal with people who do so (not to my knowledge anyway).

Does it frighten me that people here might want to cause not just myself, but my children harm? Yes. It pisses me off more so because I don’t care who you worship. I don’t care how you worship. I don’t care if you worship. It’s your life. I worship God. And he’s a loving God. And any god that says you must kill, isn’t a real god.

I think about all these countries that don’t just allow Americans to visit. They have all these rules and regulations. Well, where are our rules and regulations? Why must we suffer? It’s gotten so bad that we can’t even trust our own.

TSA has a job to do but I think they need to find a better way. I’m not for the scanner because you don’t know the long term effects of such a thing. And it just seems like we woke up one day and here they are. And we have the ‘either/or’ option. That’s a big change and you’re having humans do these pat downs which could still lead to human error.

Ugh. Good think my aunt only lives in Texas. I think we’ll take a road trip for the next visit. Seems like quality family time will be a good thing for us.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
10:08 am

@catlady -exactly!

@mom2alex&max -actually, the people who you want “racially profiled” would include many, many Israelis. Anyone with dark or olive skin who looks in any way Middle Eastern or has a Muslim-sounding name -isn’t that it? The Israeli system of profiling is completely different from what we term “racial profiling.” Let’s see:

Richard Reed, the shoe bomber -British citizenship and 1/2 African / 1/2 white -and that Richard Reed name doesn’t sound very Muslim to me.

Ann Marie Murphy -Irish -stereotypically so w/red hair and freckles. Terrorist fiance planted bomb in her suitcase lining and she VERY NEARLY got through Israeli security, but one of their bag x-rays showed something strange in her suitcase. She was also pregnant.

Let’s not forget those home-grown jokers like Timothy McVeigh, Ted Kaczynski or Eric Robert Rudolph. Don’t think they would’ve tried a plane? Who knows -they obviously had no problems with killing large groups of people or children. Others like them could hop on a plane any time.

And let’s don’t forget that latest trickster -the young Asian guy who disguised himself as an old white man -although he didn’t board in the US -no one here would suspect a thing, given the photo of him in disguise. He wasn’t a terrorist, but it certainly shines a glaring light into a great way for them to get through security!

Even George W. Bush was enraged that one of his Secret Service guards got deplaned for no other reason than “he made the flight crew nervous” because he was an Arab-American. Racial profiling doesn’t work. The minute you rely on it, some one who doesn’t fit the profile sneaks in and blows you sky high.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
10:15 am

@GTFOH…

as an airline employee….

Is this the airline’s fault?

Will you have a job if all other families all decide to boycott the airlines? Say 10,000 families nationally with 3 per family?

Have you lost your mind….quality family time and road trips of 10-15 hours do not belong in the same sentence IMHO. Maybe you live in Memphis and the trip is shorter….LOL. Glad mine are in college and can share driving with us.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
10:20 am

@mom2alex&max -yes, I’ve seen the TSA agents. That’s why I think the scanners are a good idea. Most of the agents aren’t competent enough, in my opinion, to effectively check people, so I like the idea of these scanners. People need to look at what they really show. I find the hysteria over the scanners to be laughable. Really -people think the TSA agents are taking cell phone pix of their scanned image? Even if they posted one all over the internet, you wouldn’t be able to identify the person! Get scanned and you don’t have to be patted down. According to most of the folk’s reactions here, you would think the TSA was staffed soley by ex-cons with sexual predator and child molestation charges who were chomping at the bit to fondle everyone they can get their hands on. Have you thought about it from their perspective? Would you like to intimately touch most people you see in an airport? GROSS! The general population isn’t that pretty and many of them don’t smell very good.

I do agree with bomb-sniffing and explosive sniffing (this includes plastics) dogs. You have to understand though -if a dog, for some reason, signals on you -you’re going to be SEARCHED -and I mean really, really searched -as in a private room and a guy with latex gloves…

abc

November 22nd, 2010
10:26 am

Stuff like this illustrates how successful the terrorists have been, and continue to be. They don’t have to do a thing to inspire terror; just let the government do it for them. They’ve shown Americans to be the biggest bunch of sissies and chickens ever — and more than willing to give up the oft-trumpeted freedoms and privacies in a heartbeat.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
10:28 am

@mothergoose

since i work for an airline, i have the option to fly for free. i’ve flown more in the last few years than many business travelers. i didn’t say airlines had any say in the new policy. only idiots think this is so. i’ve worked in the airline industry long enough to know the difference between an airline and TSA. thank you for your clarification.

boycotting the airline would be a good step. it would then push TSA to make changes to their policy. not a bad idea. and my mind is in tact and the elevator goes to the top. thank you very much. but i’m guessing your’s is in need of service.

quality time from Atlanta to Austin once a year to visit my family that i will now not see as often thanks to this new TSA policy. yes that’s exactly what i said. movies and songs. historic sites. stopping off at hole in the wall joints to pick up the best bbq in Miss or Ala. I think we’ll be fine. but feel free to get your panties wet by some nasty tsa person who probably hasn’t had a thorough background check themselves.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
10:28 am

@ JATL…I was in the Orlando airport about 5 years ago and having a chat with the lady next to me, as she was an English professor. We were at the gate and waiting for the plane. The sniffing dog came down the terminal and made a beeline to my carry on suitcase. The lady next to me scooted over ( probably did not want to be associated with me) and the gentleman with the leash stood their patiently. I DID NOT have anything illegal in my bag but I did have dog hair from my labrador as he always checked on my suitcase when I was getting ready to leave and while I packed. The man smiled when I told him I had a lab at home and then left with the dog, after seeing there was no problem.

A bit unnerving for me but not big deal!

Fond memories of Ole Yellar, who we put down 3 years ago…may he rest in peace! We had him for 13 years!

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by VeraMC, Jennifer . Jennifer said: Good touch, bad touch: How to explain #TSA pat-downs to kids? http://t.co/ty0g8cY [...]

Photius

November 22nd, 2010
10:32 am

Ah, Mother Jane Goose… remember your beloved Boortz and Glenn Beck are simply entertainers, not to be used for content. Since you fly often I’m sure you pick up the New York Times or Wall Street Journal and have read in the last 30 days:

- A bomb was sent from Yemen; the Arabian Peninsula is the next phase in this war as this is the new hotbed of terrorism; the US currently has Predator drones flying above Yemen and they have conducted missile strikes on several occasions. The bomb had a timer on it to explode over the crowded US Eastern corridor.
- Another bomb was sent from Namibia to Germany, simply as a dry run to study security capabilities. Al Queda in the Arabian Peninsula now is testing western security capabilities.
- Germany today closed the Reichstag Dome due to terrorist threats
- Pat downs are here to stay, Mother Jane Goose.
- The next terrorist attack will be a Cyber Attack.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
10:32 am

So now all a terrorist who is adament about blowing up a plane just needs a dog to roll around in his/her carry-on. Oh great. What’s next, cat hair to throw off the sniffing dogs. Sheesh…

catlady

November 22nd, 2010
10:35 am

mom2: The Israelis do a lot of stuff that we are surprised about. I think their advantage is they know that much of the world will step in if they need help, and, everyone knows they mean business. I don’t think we have that reputation, nor that degree of support from the rest of the world.

As to your first point, don’t forget thalydomide. Given to pregnant women for nausea, then found to cause horrible birth defects.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
10:39 am

@MJG -yes, I too, have been approached by drug -sniffing dogs on a flight from Jamaica. No drugs on me, but the dog came over BUT it didn’t signal. However, you can bet, if it’s an EXPLOSIVES sniffing dog in this day and age and they signal on YOUR BODY -you’re getting searched and searched HARD. If they signal on your bag -they’re going to pretty much tear it apart searching as well. I don’t know if the dog you encountered was for drugs, bombs or forbidden agricultural products/exotic animals, but it could have just been out on a training exercise and sniffing isn’t the same as signaling. Also, the dog handlers are not regular TSA agents. They are actually trained with their dogs and the dogs have special signals they give (lie down, sit, look or move their heads in certain ways) to indicate they’ve found something -just because they sniff at you or your bag doesn’t really mean much. The dog has to give its signal.

abc

November 22nd, 2010
10:39 am

Photius, what do you imagine a cyber attack to be? The sum total of ‘cyber attacks’ against government targets so far amounts to nothing more than web site redirection or defacement — that’s only possible because of the ineptitude and/or inattention of those tasked with administering the sites themselves. Attacks on infrastructure/power grid etc. have been ineffective due to wide variety of custom software used to operate them. There isn’t any confidentiality, but there isn’t a whole lot of vulnerability, either — at least, not from so-called ‘cyber attack’.

Don’t believe everything you read about it. Keep in mind it’s a bunch of bureaucrats that have no idea what they’re really talking about.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
10:42 am

@GTFOH -seriously? These dogs are highly trained and not “thrown off” by animal hair. They may sniff it, but they don’t signal it as something searchable. The dogs are actually quite amazing. They’ve saved many lives in Iraq and Afghanistan and the search dogs do the same thing when buildings have collapsed, etc. I would venture to guess that the average trained “sniff” dog used in security, search and rescue, police or military operations is far smarter than most TSA agents.

catlady

November 22nd, 2010
10:45 am

Eh, now one of my posts has bitten the dust!

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
10:47 am

GTFOH…I am Gold Medallion, maybe with your airline. I may not fly as much as you do but I do fly quite a bit. I have been in airports in all 50 states. I work for myself and if my elevator did need service, I would not have a job as each person who hires me does so solely based on what I know.

Many presume this is the airlines fault and I wanted to hear something from an insider, sorry if you were offended. If you do not need to worry about your job that is great…some others might.

When Eastern struck…they won….but they did not have their jobs. In the end Frank Lornenzo won.
Boycotts can come on any industry for any reason and employees suffer. Those of us who have lived here for a while remember this.

We can’t fight the government, so now we force collateral damage? Never underestimate the power of uninformed people in numbers.

If road trips for hours, in the car, are always joyful for you then you obviously have done something right with your kids. Good for you! I love my kids but never liked long road trips with them. We fly.

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
10:47 am

JATL: I’m not going to change my mind and you are not going to change yours. I find this whole procedure morally reprehensible, ethically wrong and unconstitutional. I am not going to pay my hard earned money for a plane ticket only to be treated like a common criminal. TSA finds a better way or believe you me, I’m not the only one that will stop flying.

When enough people are outraged and stop flying, the airlines will turn on the pressure and the procedure will change. And really, we will not be ANY safer OR unsafer than before.

I’m not getting groped and I am not risking my health or privacy on one of those body scans. And that’s how the terrorists have already won. They have ALREADY stripped us of the precious freedoms we have been fighting for.

gonetoofar

November 22nd, 2010
10:50 am

Muslim Women don’ have to be patted down. I think I will start a business to sell Hijabs to American Women and little girls!

Muslim Group Advises Women Wearing Hijabs to Allow TSA ‘Enhanced Pat Downs’ Only on Head and Neck Area
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/muslim-group-advises-women-wearing-hijab

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
10:54 am

@JATL…I am with you on the dog sniffing. Fascinating stuff. I knew it would not be a problem, as the signals given were benign. Just got a kick out of it.

I also concur:
I would venture to guess that the average trained “sniff” dog used in security, search and rescue, police or military operations is far smarter than most TSA agents.

@GTOFH..the airlines employ you, after your comment about dog sniffing…whose elevator has a problem? Hope you work for Air Tran….LOL.

@photius…the Rabbi was the one I was fascinated with and he ( I presume) is not an entertainer.
Ya think?

@lakerat….any comments on the demise of Eastern…you surely know more than I would.

HB

November 22nd, 2010
10:56 am

Interesting side note: a scientist proposed a simple imaging technique to help ease privacy concerns back in 2006. Basically, the pictures would be distorted to the point that the image would not resemble the person being x-rayed, but would still show the threats they can see on the current pictures. That doesn’t address concerns over health risks that scanners may pose, but I think this would have made a lot more people feel ok about the scans.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/11/21/AR2010112104456.html?hpid=topnews

MJG, I’m confused about your repeatedly saying the policy is not the airlines’. So what? I think we all know that, but you seem to think that’s a reason not to boycott. If people are uncomfortable with the procedures, they aren’t going to buy tickets and subject themselves and their children to them anyway because “airlines didn’t create the policy.” And yes, the airlines and related travel businesses are the ones that will suffer, but that will likely pressure TSA to come up with procedures that most travelers are comfortable with.

Photius

November 22nd, 2010
10:59 am

ABC, Defense Secretary Gates last week speaking at the WSJ’s CEO Council said the threat of Cyber Attacks is “huge”. Simply read about the Stuxnet complex computer worm, likely placed into Iranian nuclear computers to destroy center fuses via the Mossad. Russia successfully waged Cyber War against Estonia and Georgia effectively shutting down all computer transmissions which would effect everything in our lives. As reported in the NYT’s China has been testing United States computer infrastructure systems, mapping our electrical grid, water treatment facilities and air traffic control. China also hacked into Obama’s and McCain’s campaign headquarters in 2008 copying all their information. Now imagine a Cyber Attack on Morgan Stanley or Citi…. Imagine if the attacker simply deleted $4 trillion dollars in daily assets? The Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, said last week “there is a huge future threat, and a considerable current threat from Cyber Attacks.” Pat downs are here to stay and Cyber Attacks are coming.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
11:08 am

I’m fairly young so I don’t know much about Eastern. But as a people we must inform those who are uninformed. The man at TSA is just that…a man making a decision for the majority. It doesn’t mean he can’t be wrong. It doesn’t mean there aren’t better ways to do target those that need to be targeted without making everyone feel like a common criminal. Are you all serious? This is what it comes to? This will be the norm going forth? Do I need to get a Hijab for my daughters and myself for travel purposes? Do I refuse to take them to see parts of the world because of this? There has to be too much outrage for this to continue. I don’t plan to be violated.

And yes @mjgoose, my girls are well behaved. But it doesn’t mean my 2yo won’t require a break. But those are the sacrifices we have to take. And as far as the new policies with TSA, we haven’t discussed them here in our offices. As we too have to follow the rules or opt out. I plan to opt out.

And at JATL as much as I’ve flown I’ve only once been put in the clear box and I was pregnant at that time. I’m mindful about what I pack and wear. TSA agents aren’t highly educated. They do what they are told. And some not as well as the few. And considering I’m not fond of dogs, I’ll do what I need to steer clear of them too.

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
11:12 am

@gonetoofar: that’s just flipping great. I wonder what would happen if *I* made a stink and refused to be touched on religious principles!!!

GD it; they HAVE already won!

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
11:16 am

It’s amazing how comfortable you all are in dogs and their ability to sniff out mess. But @mjgoose was approached thanks to old yeller. I’m sure some idiot willing to blow his own brains out could use such a story to convince a dog and his handler of how non-threatening he/she may be. Not every person with ill intentions are of dark or olive skin tone. But did anyone forget 9/11? Do you all remember all the stories of people who have been caught with explosives on a plane? And I don’t work for AirTran you dope. But does that mean they are incompetent? AirTran, Southwest, Delta, NW, etc., etc., still have nothing to do with this new policy. Now are you sure that your elevator reaches the top floor. Madoff made a lot of money who thought his elevator reached the top. If it did, he wouldn’t be sitting where he is today.

MrLiberty

November 22nd, 2010
11:19 am

Why don’t you begin by explaining that laws don’t apply to the government or its employees, but only to the citizens, Explain to them that what the TSA is doing to children is just legalized child molestation and legalized sexual assault of adults. It is illegal for adults to do this outside of the screening area and it should be illegal to do what the TSA is doing but that’s how government works are why government is such an evil thing.

Explain to them how mommy and daddy sat on the sidelines while Bush and his gang of war criminals destroyed the Bill of Rights and the constitution because mommy and daddy were too lazy and too scared to do some investigating of their own on the internet to find out how events like 9-11 are abused by every government in history as vehicles for consolidating power in the hands of government and for destroying the rights of the people. Explain to them how you were too busy to get out and protest the war, the invasions, the Patriot Act and how looking good in the eyes of your friends and neighbors was more important than taking a stand.

Explain to them that we did not get here overnight but that this slow erosion of rights has been going on for decades and decades and that you were too busy with your careers and watching sports to care about what folks up in washinton were doing to their future. I’m sure your kids will understand. Afterall, the government only does things for the good of the citizens right??? Maybe you could also give your kids a history lesson about the 200 million of their own citizens that governments killed during the 20th century alone.

Just boycott air travel until the TSA is gone and sanity is returned. Its the least you could do since you didn’t do anything to try and stop this (oh, and don’t say you voted for Kerry, Gore, or Obama). Its clear how Obama is working out and Gore and Kerry would have been just as bad. If you actually voted Libertarian or for Ron Paul, you definitely get a pass on this one, but then that shows you weren’t just sitting on the sidelines hoping everything would be ok.

Mark

November 22nd, 2010
11:21 am

Boycott Flying COMPLETELY, until sanity returns! Please join us: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Boycott-Flying/126801010710392

joey

November 22nd, 2010
11:27 am

This is a perverse thing that the TSA is doing. It is not okay to touch people in the name of security. The Germans before WWII insisted that their invasion of other companies was for security, or leavenscram, “living space”. When the Germans decided to rid the business districs of the jews it was for protecting the popluation from the “evil devil banker jews”. Security can be used by powers to rid people of their rights, and it is the case here! Wake up people, no more TSA, no more terror by our goverment against ourselves! We did not crash the planes in the buildings, it could happen again, that is life, do not tread on our freedoms to create a “safe” police state. The TSA has gone over the cliff and it seems no one wants to speak up for thier erroronous ways in our goverment. That is very scary, do not accept these security measures at all. It is not right to touch children in such ways, just gross!

Seriously...

November 22nd, 2010
11:28 am

How about this dammit. I’m just not flying. It’s hard enough to trust if the planes are safe (enough fuel, proper maintenance)in the air. Now I have to worry about what the dog smells, if the TSA agent is a pedophile, if I should consider a Hijab for travel purposes, the long term effects of this body scanner, how some idiot with a GED may touch my child if the scanner goes off. I imagine the people flying or arguing about why you should fly don’t have small children.

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
11:32 am

@Seriously: you are being generous assuming they even have GEDs.

abc

November 22nd, 2010
11:36 am

Mr. Gates overstates the obvious. Network Security is my business. Campaign organizations run by newbies is low-hanging fruit, and nothing critical; systems in the Eastern Hemisphere are primitive and more likely to break down of their own accord than to succumb to electronic attack.

The real folly is to rely upon networks for issues of national security. Certainly, the American power grid and electronic financial infrastructure could be pinpointed and hacked, but the effect wouldn’t be as great as some let on. Effective attack from afar is extremely unlikely — something like leaving infected flash drives in a break area, or gaining access through janitorial crews, is much more effective and likely.

Scare tactics exercised upon people who don’t understand the technology is akin to TSA implementing full body scans and frisks based on presumed vulnerability of air travel. If it’s that dangerous, just don’t do it.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
11:39 am

O.K…so you work for Delta? Can you, for the record, state that you do not care if anyone flies at all or that it does not matter than I am a Gold Medallion with your airline.

I fly all the time but obviously those who only fly to Grandma’s know more about this than me.

Anyone care to comment on this:

Economic Impact: Hartsfield-Jackson has a direct economic impact of more than about $32.5 billion for the metro Atlanta area economy.

BOYCOTT FLYING and see if it affects any of your neighbors, friends and family members.

MAKE A STINK at the airport on W and see if you make it to your destination.

I rest my case. Y’all have a good day and please solve this problem quickly :).

Bethany

November 22nd, 2010
11:40 am

This is gettting to be way to much. They made a poor cancer surviver take out her prostetic breasts. They are terrorizing children, and quite frankly this is just a great way for unregistered perverts and pedofiles to get their rocks off. Get a job with the TSA. Kuddos for Florida for turning the TSA away and going with a private company, they will be profiling.

UNCLE BLIP

November 22nd, 2010
11:41 am

I’ve worked on several planes in several cities and I refuse to fly. Anywhere I go, I go by car, train, or bus. I’m good at what I do and I trust me. Scanner, pat down, or not…I’ll stick with the road.

Spike

November 22nd, 2010
11:43 am

The enemy has won. The government now as permission to physically touch our childrens bodies in a manner that we would not tolerate anyone much less a stranger do. We have in some cases allowed the government to mandatory personally “touching” our children and we say to our kids that’s what we need to do be great message for the next generation.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
11:47 am

I bet if most people opt out of flying for Thanksgiving (the busiest holiday of the year), TSA will be forced to rethink this policy. And yes, everyone is effected.

Cammi317

November 22nd, 2010
11:47 am

I don’t like it all. So what happens if you go through the x-ray machine and you’re wearing a tampon? Are they going to insist that you step to the side and yank it out to prove that it’s only a tampon and not cocaine or some other illegal drug shoved up inside of you? I know this is a gross example, but it’s a possibility. Where do we draw the line?

justsumstuff

November 22nd, 2010
11:49 am

The troops in hostile territory can’t use the scanners or touch the known enemy, yet our own citizens are subject to this humiliating searches. Yeah, the Muslims object and the President Obama agrees. Law abiding citizens that are paying taxes are penalized for this. So for those that have the option to fly, tell me how to get from Hawaii, where I live because the Army said so, to “home on the East Coast” without flying? The “find other transportation, flying is an option” opinionated people need to get unselfish & realize not everyone is just like them. When known terrorist & enemies are subject to these “searches” then all will be right with the world.

justsumstuff

November 22nd, 2010
11:54 am

When you explain to your kids, make sure that you tell them about their rights as the grow so that children don[’t get “used to being led like sheep” & give up their rights. Write your congress, state representative, your government officials! These rights are what makes us free! TSA is oppressive.

HB

November 22nd, 2010
11:59 am

“Anyone care to comment on this:

Economic Impact: Hartsfield-Jackson has a direct economic impact of more than about $32.5 billion for the metro Atlanta area economy.

BOYCOTT FLYING and see if it affects any of your neighbors, friends and family members”

Sure, I will. Economic impact is the WHOLE POINT OF A BOYCOTT! No one thinks it won’t make things hard for a lot of people, but the hope is that the temporary hardship will make enough of an impact to convince TSA to change it’s policies. If you are comfortable with “naked” scans and “enhanced” pat-downs, more power to you, but you seem to think people who aren’t should be more concerned with supporting the airlines financially than standing up against policies that they believe violate their rights and their children’s rights to privacy. Personally, I’m not willing to sacrifice my right to privacy, which is what purchasing and using a ticket now seems to require, just to help out Delta and its employees. It’s lousy for them, but being groped is lousy for me! I don’t plan to fly until the rules are changed, but it’s note me hurting them — it’s TSA. I’ll also be writing my Congressman to express my concerns.

J.R.

November 22nd, 2010
12:02 pm

Arrest all the TSA agents. They are thieves, and sexual molesters.

Everything they do is theatre, none of it actually increases security, and much of it actually makes it more dangerous to fly. They waste our time, waste our money, trample our rights. TSA are the new terrorists.

Grant

November 22nd, 2010
12:14 pm

Oh, good Lord. Just go through the scanner. This is the same for kids as for adults. Surely someone has already seen you naked anyway and the kids, depending on age, don’t even have to realize the difference between this scanner and an x-ray. And, surely, it’s better than being groped. Of course, I’m left to wonder where all of this would be if, in fact, profiling were allowed.

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
12:19 pm

HB…we are generally never on the same page…so be it.

There are those here who have and will still have lunch with me and do realize that my elevator certainly does go to the top. Many do not.

Those who work for Coke and even the chip, paper products and peanut companies will also be affected.

Do these employees wake up today and say, ” oh wow…I may not have a job by Christmas because of this airline boycott and I am absolutely fine with it: PLEASE DO NOT FLY.”

Innocent people will be affected when the anger about TSA is actually anger towards our government.

I guess I am the only one who thinks the airlines cannot straighten out our government in a quick fashion. I wish them well! I certainly could be wrong, as I have been in the past.

The airlines may be able to solve the problem with their pressure today but the government will sneak it’s tentacles in and take over in another fashion.

OUTTA HERE TO BUY THE GROCERIES FOR TH….HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYONE!

mom2alex&max

November 22nd, 2010
12:28 pm

MJG: boycotts affect innocent people all the time. That’s how they work!!! How do you suggest we show our displeasure??? When can’t boycott the govt!

And give it a rest already with the “people like me” routine. Everyone knows you are well loved in all 50 states, run a multi million dollar company and have two of the most promising minds of this generation as children. We get it already. Good grief.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
12:32 pm

@GTFOH-what are you talking about in your response to me? Yeah, I get the dog part, but I’ve said several times already that TSA agents are neither that smart (usually chose being a TSA agent over working the Burger King drive through) or highly trained. Why are you talking about the “clear box” and what you wear when you fly? I, too, am quite mindful of what I wear when flying -not sure what your response is supposed to mean.

HB

November 22nd, 2010
12:37 pm

“Innocent people will be affected when the anger about TSA is actually anger towards our government.”

Innocent people are being affected now by the invasive searches. No one is saying the airlines will solve the problem (nor are we setting out to punish them), but we do believe that speaking up and taking action can convince the government to adjust its policies (hopefully sooner rather than later). Maybe it will work, maybe it won’t, but one thing is certain — going along with policies that we believe are overly intrusive and saying/doing nothing will guarantee they stay in place. If you’re comfortable with the policies, then great, keep flying, but I find it odd that you think those who aren’t should just subject themselves and their children to it anyway for the sake of the airlines and related businesses rather than stay home or choose a mode of transportation that doesn’t require them to undergo something they find invasive.

Don’t worry too much about the Coke and peanuts, though — I’ll still be buying those and using napkins on the train. :)

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
12:40 pm

@GTFOH -actually, I’m going to go completely out of “character” on this blog today and totally side with MJG -it’s YOUR elevator that’s not going to the top! I’ve accused her of having reading comprehension problems in the past, but after reading some of your further posts -they don’t even make sense. You obviously have no clue and need to do some research on search/alert dogs. Just because you don’t like dogs doesn’t mean you have to be completely ignorant of what some of them can do. And Bernie Madoff isn’t where he is because he was stupid or his “elevator didn’t go to the top” -which usually implies more “looney” than stupid; he’s there because he was actually very smart and very duplicitous for a long time -then he got caught. He’s an evil man with no moral compass, but he’s not stupid.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
12:53 pm

Bottom line…you aren’t going to violate me or my children so I don’t have to and I won’t explain to them. And this new radiation scanner or whatever it is, you’re not going to put me or my child through that. Screw your thoughts and what you feel is okay and your dogs, the agents, and the TSA adminstration and the government. I’ll be damned. If you don’t feel violated something is wrong with you. There’s a way to deal with all this but I definitely disagree with the current method/policy.

People who have been raped/molested shouldn’t be forced to have to walk through that scanner. And essentially, you are being forced to do so. People say it’s safe…then prove it. 10-20 years from now, a lawsuit will be filed because of this very argument we are all having today.

GTFOH

November 22nd, 2010
12:55 pm

JATL I’m so done with you for today…and for ever more. I’m aware of what dogs can do for you and to you. And my posts make much sense. And if they don’t, why do you bother yourself. Maybe you need servicing as well.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
1:04 pm

@Seriously -yep, I have a 2 and 4 year old. If we were going to fly anywhere soon, we would go through the scanners. I have a microwave in my house and a cell phone and we have about 4 laptops at home along with the television, etc. I’m FAR more concerned with radiation on a daily basis from those than the scanner. If I were a pilot or flight attendant or someone who flies so much that the scanners and the radiation they give off might honestly affect me -then yeah, maybe I would be uncomfortable with them, but at this point I’m not.

Like Grant and Andy Richter said -if you go through the scanner -you won’t be patted down unless they see something pretty inexplicable there (like a foreign object shoved down in your pants or hidden in your bra). Sure, boycott the airlines. Since the poll last week indicated that 80% of Americans were just fine with all of this, then I think you’re wasting your time. I’m betting at least half of you who posted here today wouldn’t be upset at all about any of this if the media hadn’t been fanning the flames and screaming about it for 2 weeks now. If you think THIS security screening change is heralding an erosion of our civil liberties and rights -then you’ve had your head in the sand for so long you should probably leave it there. It’s just the latest in a long list of erosions. I’ll ask again -how many of you thought the Patriot Act was a good idea? Yeah -if you’re honest -plenty of you did, and now, here we are. I’m actually interested in Florida’s private security firm idea and how it works. Could be the way to go!

As far as Muslim women being exempt – that’s not true. The TSA released a statement that everyone, regardless of religion or anything else, would have to have the same type of pat down if they objected to the screening. So, I’m sure many of you already feel safer -if Muslim women can’t fly, then that lets out a lot of terroristic-looking people who scare you on planes. See -there’s always a silver lining for you!

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
1:15 pm

@GTFOH -I hope you’re done with this blog too, because your intelligence, comprehension and communication skills are sub-par at best. “And my post makes much sense.” -Well, that sums it up entirely.

Michelle

November 22nd, 2010
1:28 pm

I will not put myself or my child through the strip search/naked body scanner. If my son and I fly next year, he will be 8 years old. We will have a discussion before leaving the house during which time I will tell him that if he is touched by these government-sponsored rapists, that he is to scream and scream and scream at the top of his lungs and kick and punch and bite and that he is not to stop even if I tell him to do so. I will make damn fricking sure that EVERYBODY around will know what they are doing to him. I will be screaming as well and no matter what the rapists say, I will not make him stop screaming and fighting.

This is rape, plain and simple. And for those who think rape is a sex crime, let me set you straight. It is a crime of power – with sex as the ultimate weapon against the victim. The government is telling us that we have no choice but to submit to the electronic strip search or be sexually assaulted. In some cases there are no body scanners and people are being pulled aside for this assault. In other cases, even when people clear the body scanners they are still pulled aside and sexually assaulted. If we refuse, we are screamed at, publically humiliated, handcuffed to chairs, threatened with jail, arrested and jailed, detained indefinitely, made to miss our flights. All of this so they can look at and touch our bodies??????? BULL – it is RAPE! My son and I will fight and scream and make a spectacle!

Theresa Walsh Giarrusso

November 22nd, 2010
1:41 pm

second blog is up — Arizona sending home notes to let you know your kid is fat — is any of the school’s business??

http://blogs.ajc.com/momania/2010/11/22/should-schools-send-home-notes-if-kids-are-overweight/

BluebellJones

November 22nd, 2010
1:41 pm

jatl-you are not in any way important. Just so you know. Your posts are bombastic and repetitive, your insults apply more to yourself than to those you condemn. Just take it down a notch. Nobody cares. It’s a blog, for goodness sake. Your life must be a wretched thing, causing you to spend so much energy on something so insignificant.

BluebellJones

November 22nd, 2010
1:43 pm

Michelle, I agree. You’ll get arrested but what the h*ll.

perkle

November 22nd, 2010
2:17 pm

I haven’t had to fly in a long time anyway, but I will avoid it all costs until this madness goes away. You know the true terrorists are laughing their heads off. I feel sorry for my brother who has to fly twice a week every week on business.

bb

November 22nd, 2010
2:23 pm

for those who are saying you have to set off the metal detector first this is NOT true. i was subjected to a full body pat down in boston’s logan airport because i was “wearing a skirt” and “could have anything strapped on under there.” i did not set off a metal detector. my carry-on was not searched. it was supposedly all about the skirt. so why was i not patted down only below the waist? my shirt was not “loose and flowing.” nothing could conceivably be hidden under there. my only (small) consolation was that the woman performing the pat down seemed as uncomfortable as i was.

Ituri

November 22nd, 2010
2:56 pm

How about this for explaining to your kids.

“Nobody is ever allowed to touch you in a way you don’t like, and this includes government officials. No government agency can EVER tell you you don’t have your constitutionally guaranteed rights, and you should NOT tolerate those that try such things. Until our rights are respected, we should not fly as protest.”

There is no explaining sexual molestation to your kids as if its okay. It’s NEVER okay. The only way its okay is if you’ve committed a crime, the ONLY action that can in turn discard your individual rights, due to your harming someone elses rights in some way.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
2:57 pm

@Michelle -If you want to waste your money on plane tickets, that’s your prerogative, because you won’t be allowed to fly. If you create that much of a problem, you’ll also be arrested, and your son will go into the care of DFACS while it’s all sorted out. Is it really that important to you? I suggest you plot out a driving course for your trip or just stay at home and save yourself the anguish and the wasted plane fare.

LM

November 22nd, 2010
3:13 pm

The last time I flew was to DC in the spring. I expected to be patted down thinking I would set off the metal detector since I had my shoulder replaced a few months earlier. I didn’t set off the detector much to my surprise. I was even given a card to carry with the implant information on it to give to the screeners.

On the other hand, how much of this will blow over in a few months? So many here keep saying they will not fly due to the TSA screening, but …. how many will?

Wow, Michelle...

November 22nd, 2010
3:30 pm

….RAPE – really??? “Touching” your son or you is NOT rape – maybe you need to go back to your shrink since you are confusing “battery” (touching/hitting against your will) with Rape (sexual penetration of the vagina, anus, or mouth).. You are really going to screw up you kid with that mentality…

kathy

November 22nd, 2010
3:31 pm

We should not be opting for either! To be virtually strip searched or molested, gee is that really a choice? It’s time for Americans to WAKE UP, your Fourth Amendment rights are slipping away. Bit by bit, the government puts another link in the chain that will soon strangle any semblance of the country our Founders intended. I can imagine the terrorists smiling at all this – they’ve managed to get our government to participate in stamping out American ideals and liberty to make us live like their people do – in abject submission to tyranny.

Join Opt Out Day in a creative way – wear your bathing suit under your clothes. TSA says we should partner with them – this is an idea that should accomplish our mission and help them accomplish thiers. Get details on how this can help and join us at http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/I-will-wear-my-bathing-suit-to-the-airport/161575693879561

Ssorry, LM...

November 22nd, 2010
3:33 pm

…but presenting your “card” that indentifies you as a shoulder replacement recipient does not and will not give you a free pass IF you ever set off the metal detector. All those people know is that you set off the detector, and that REQUIRES the fill scan or pat down…no matter what your “card” may say – as the saying goes, I’ve “been there and had that done”…

SJ

November 22nd, 2010
3:44 pm

I’m not sure why JATL is being piled on. I think she brings a lot of common sense to these discussions. I may not always agree with everything she says, but she provides thoughtful arguments (which is more than I can say for many).

LM

November 22nd, 2010
3:44 pm

Sorry, I never said I expected a free pass. I know I may set off the scanners, I know I may have to be patted down. I knew as soon as we discussed getting an implant I might have a longer security search when traveling and to give myself more time before boarding. Just like many years ago when I did apheresis donation and had lots of needle marks in my arms, I also carried a letter from the Red Cross explaining the needle marks. There is nothing wrong with having documentation with you, but I know it will not give me a free pass.

JATL

November 22nd, 2010
4:22 pm

@SJ -Thank You! GTFOH seems to have taken offense at both my and MJG’s inability to decipher what she is trying to say. The other one is a troll who I ignore and don’t feed. Have a happy Thanksgiving!

motherjanegoose

November 22nd, 2010
4:27 pm

JATL…thanks for your vote of confidence. I also agree with SJ about you.

While I do not always like or agree with things that are happening…sometimes I choose to
“fly under the radar” and thus I WILL move compliantly through the security line ( for now) and do what I have to do to get to my clients who are expecting me. They signed contracts 6-12 months ago and we had no idea this would happen.

If a doctor scheduled your surgery for next week and did not return from the Thanksgiving holidays as he/ she decided to boycott flying and perhaps was 2000 miles away…would you be fine with delaying everything to make sure your Doctor felt safe? Or would you switch Doctors?

Thousands of folks perform duties that are miles more important than what I do and they will still get on the airplane as they have a job to do and a reputation to keep.

If I wimp out at things like this…others may refuse to hire me.

NO my job is not the most important thing to most all of you on here but it IS important to my clients ( who are expecting me with a room full of people) and also my family which includes the two kids I have in college. I just bought $200 worth of groceries and did not have to think about where the money came from since I have worked hard all year. If I choose not to fly, things will be radically different. Thus I make choices for what works for me.

THIS IS JUST ME and I do not expect anyone else to agree. Call me stupid if you wish, others here have done so. I have flown in a skirt lots of times and this never triggered a thing. I am confused about this and other comments today.

I am thrilled I will not be at the airport on W. Should be interesting.

[...] who’ve told their children not to let strangers touch them, now have to tell them that they must endure a TSA pat-down if they want to fly. Consider the recent strip search of a young boy. Fortunately, the TSA appear to be relenting a [...]

Mike

November 22nd, 2010
7:43 pm

The x-rays are dangerous, the TSA agents are molesters, and the government is doing its best to destroy our liberties. Those of you who think this is no big deal are truly stupid.

Sam

November 23rd, 2010
1:02 am

First a tax cheat and now a pervert that’s change you can really believe in.

Joe Traveler

November 23rd, 2010
6:58 am

Ok, I have to jump in here. I am a frequent business traveler and while I am not thrilled with the new “pat down” practice, I am also a realist and understands the need to protect our security here in the U.S. If they didn’t pat down passengers and something was brought on board of an aircraft, we as an American society would be very quick to pass judgement on the government. We would protest the TSA saying that they aren’t doing enough to protect us. However let’s now shift that paradigm and look at the current standards. Funny how we are quick to say how the security standards are too stringent and how our civil liberties are being violated. Come on here fellow Americans! You can’t have it both ways, at least not anymore thanks to those radicals that want to harm us.

deidre_NC

November 23rd, 2010
7:09 am

i know this was about kids and pat downs..but really kids are not the only issues….for example:
http://www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/tsa-pat-down-leaves-750644.html

deidre_NC

November 23rd, 2010
7:53 am

deidre_NC

November 23rd, 2010
7:54 am

motherjanegoose

November 23rd, 2010
8:27 am

@ Joe, thanks for jumping in . I am a business traveler too and I think those who are shouting the loudest are going to Grandma’s or the beach once or twice a year. Not many folks take their kids with them on business trips all year.

Would you please share how we are not the only ones who spend much of our lives in airports. You probably are there more than me. How would we work if we had to fly? If they do not like the rules…they can stay home…if we do not like the rules…we have no job. To me, opt out W is not about the business traveler but the casual traveler…it is a day I already avoid the airport like the plague. Will you be there?

motherjanegoose

November 23rd, 2010
8:28 am

ooops…how would we work if we could not fly…sorry

Janet

November 23rd, 2010
8:58 am

I think patting down kids is absurd. My skinny, blond haired, blue-eyed, 9 year old daughter had to go through the scanner and be patted down. My 35 year old husband didn’t have to be patted down. Does that really make sense???

1911A1

November 23rd, 2010
12:03 pm

There seems to be some misunderstanding that Israel’s screening is racial profiling; it’s not. It’s criminal profiling. The agent asks each and every passenger a few simple questions and monitors the passengers’ responses. Those who give visual cues are pulled aside for further scrutiny.

My father was a US Customs officer for over 30 years. He could tell who was up to something just by looking in their eyes while he was asking the standard battery of questions. That’s what we need to be doing, not irridating or groping innocent people.

The TSA was established in the post-9/11 panic as a knee-jerk reaction. It was ramrodded through Congress as a government jobs program with the inane selling point along the lines of, “if you want to professionalize, you must federalize.” That’s rich: these “professionals” are barely literate goons on a power trip…and so are their bosses.

I’ve written my Congressman to encourage him to look into de-funding the TSA. What they are doing is unconstitutional.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” – Fourth Amendment

[...] Article Here [...]

[...] Article Here [...]

Cammi317

November 23rd, 2010
1:34 pm

Anyone see the article that posted today about the TSA agent who kidnapped a passenger and sexually assaulted her? Please tell me again why I would agree to allow one of these pervs grope either myself or my daughter…

underwired

November 23rd, 2010
2:53 pm

I flew last month from Atlanta to Detroit and was singled out for a body scan AND wanding (in ATL), apparently because of the sequins on my top. Wearing a different shirt on the way home, I set off both the walk-through and the wand metal detectors in Detroit and was subjected to the pat-down. It was finally determined that the metal in my bra was the culprit. I would be a lot less concerned about these “enhancements” if the detectors could distinguish between a weapon and underwear!

Stranger Danger « New Sky Radio

November 23rd, 2010
2:57 pm

[...] Here 0 comments print Leave a Comment Below print [...]

Susan

November 23rd, 2010
6:41 pm

I can not believe anyone is even thinging it is okay to teach our children this is okay. NO WAY will anyone touch my child. We will NOT be flying until someone uses their brain here.

MrLiberty

November 26th, 2010
2:52 pm

People can only get together and perpetrate tyrrany with the help of others. Government can only exist with the cooperation of the masses, for they are truly in the minority. It is clear from reading these posts that most of you are on the side of liberty while a small minority are clearly saying whatever they need to say to justify their support of this tyrrany. In the end, we will all know them by their actions.

lisa

November 27th, 2010
8:38 pm

I live in a town where they do not have these x-ray machines up and running and so I do let my son fly, but as soon as it gets to the point where we have to be x-rayed or groped to get to the gate there’s no way I would go through it, and no way EVER would I let my son go through it. No x-rays, and no touching. I am a mom of four, and I have been sexually assaulted and I teach my kids that their bodies are their own and nobody, NOBODY gets to touch them there unless mommy is there and I say its ok (as in a doctor).
As for airport check point once you enter you are required to keep going–that’s the stupidest crap I’ve ever heard of. So you get there and you realize that its going to be touchy-feely and you say no, and want to go home instead and they fine you? I’d do a counter sue.