
A good basketball conference just got even better. In a football world, will that be enough? (AP photo)
Back in those distant days of September, the ACC believed it had fortified itself against all assaults. It had added Notre Dame, albeit with an asterisk, and by imposing a $50 million exit fee it had surely given any any member institution with wandering eyes cause for pause. But here it’s not yet December and the same proactive conference is having to scramble to play catch-up ball.
Last week Maryland, thumbing its nose at 60 years of tradition and that $50 million penalty, bolted for the Big Ten. If Maryland, which isn’t much good at football and has become ordinary in basketball, could be lured by the promise of bigger money elsewhere, what happens when some other league pitches serious woo at Florida State and/or Clemson?
By raiding the Big East for Syracuse and Pittsburgh, the ACC enhanced its already-exalted hoops profile, but basketball doesn’t pay the bills the way football does. Television money for ACC football pales alongside the packages of most of the other big leagues. (If it didn’t, Maryland wouldn’t have leaped.) This only underscores the ironclad law of supply and demand: ACC football has been pretty putrid — the league went 0-for-4 against SEC opposition last weekend, and the conference’s Orange Bowl representative could be 7-6 Georgia Tech — and nobody is clamoring to air more installments of Boston College-Wake Forest.
Losing Maryland was such a shock to the ACC system that the league had to respond just to prove it could. On Tuesday it filed a lawsuit in the effort to make Maryland pay every penny of that $50 million. On Wednesday it moved to add Louisville, which is great at basketball and good at football, and who cares if the only coast the Cardinals occupy is that of the Ohio River? Louisville was the best athletic program available, but U of L doesn’t quite fit the ACC’s high-falutin’ academic image. (Full disclosure: My dad was a graduate of Louisville’s dental school, and I was accepted by its law school.) Which tells us that the ACC is getting antsy.
It’s unclear who’ll be left when the Cardinals arrive in 2014. Florida State coach Jimbo Fisher railed against the inequities of the BCS, saying it was ludicrous that his once-beaten Seminoles were ranked only 10th last week, below five SEC schools. That was yet another warning flare that Florida State might not be long for the ACC. (On cue, FSU then lost at home to Florida. Memo to Jimbo: Beat somebody good before you pop off.)
And if FSU (or Clemson) goes, what will become of ACC football? Notre Dame has agreed to play five games a year against conference opponents while remaining an independent. If the ACC can persuade the Irish to join the league in football, too, its problems would be solved, or at least lessened. But Notre Dame is about to play for the BCS title, rendering that case exponentially harder to make.
ESPN reports that the ACC considered both UConn and Cincinnati, two more schools desperate to bail out of the capsized Big East, but decided to go with Louisville first because, writes Brett McMurphy, “there is a sense among league presidents that the ACC can add more schools at a later date if (it) lost any other schools.” Not three months after enfranchising Notre Dame (with that major asterisk), the conference is already working on Plans B and C.
But Louisville won’t, and UConn and Cincinnati wouldn’t, do what the ACC needs most. None of those programs would bolster football in the way it needs bolstering, which brings us to the greater point: There’s no football power apt to leave its current home — not Texas, not Oklahoma — for the prospects of making less money to play in a lesser conference. With the Big East in tatters, the Big Six of BCS leagues has been reduced to five. Unless/until the ACC convinces Notre Dame to come fully aboard, it can never hope to be more than the fifth-best conference in the the sport that matters most, and a distant fifth at that.
By Mark Bradley
116 comments Add your comment
dawgfan
November 28th, 2012
8:39 pm
Tech fans are on hard drugs if they think the Big 10 has any interest in them whatsoever. That is beyond laughable.
come on
November 28th, 2012
8:57 pm
Bark Madly is a pompous pain in the back side. If I was affiliated with any ACC program and you showed up with media credential I would throw you out. You lack any journalistic integrity and every thing you write is the sec’s poo don’t stink and the ACC can’t do anything right. How about you get over yourself Bark Madly you write for a fish wrapper. I will no longer read another article you write because I am sick and tired of this crap you feed us. I stopped reading Schultz along time ago for the same reason, and you have just become worse as time has gone on. Bark Madly you are a joke.
Ken
November 29th, 2012
7:56 am
While I do not claim to know the hearts and minds of the ACC presidents, what I can do is read the situation as I see it.
The assertion of this article is that by adding Louisville, the ACC failed to do what it needed/wanted to do. Build a better football conference. Perhaps Mark is missing the point and the ACC did exactly what it wanted to do.
To assume that football trumps everything is an absurd position to take. Yes football revenue drives a great deal of things, but not all schools and/or conferences will go to the deuce to build football programs. As a Georgia Tech grad, I do not want my Institute or the conference to which Tech is affiliated to take that route. Why??? Because in the current landscape of college football, the path to such a place would be directly at odds with the missions/visions of nearly every school in the ACC.
SJ
November 29th, 2012
8:41 am
I believe the Noderdayme administration is looking at their “Shamrock Luck” and realizing just how fortunate they are that Oregon & KSU were upset so late in the season. They may now realize that a conference championship game against an FSU or VPI&SU could help them considerably.
The other pressure ND has is that they MUST put their non-football sports somewhere. The ACC gives them that. And fotball scheduling is tougher for ND now. The ACC helps that issue. ND does have a selfish interest in ACC health with the conference sticking together.
We’ll see what happens as negotiations go forward with the ND / NBC deal.
demhairydwags
November 29th, 2012
9:54 am
LOL@gt in the B1G let me know when you get a real conference. and FIRE MARK RICHT don’t be fooled by the season he is a TERRIBLE, SOFT COACH and we can’t WIN with CMR
wes
November 29th, 2012
10:23 am
Hey Mark, great article.
Maybe the ACC should think BOLDLY and go after Auburn and Alabama..ya’ know…to enhance their football market.
P.S.
You’re an idiot.
Pieersquared
November 29th, 2012
11:46 am
The BIG has said over and over and over that they want to expand to contiguous states. Every addition to their conference has come from contiguous states. GT will be on an island and recruits, fans, everyone will have to travel for all away games and recruiting will suffer. See what Nebraska fans think now that they are cut off from Texas recruiting. You will be the new Wake Forest in the B10. They are much more likely to offer Missouri or Syracuse and Yukon than they are GT. The latter two are in larger markets than GT and already have regional competitors with Penn State, Rutgers and MD. You guys need to get real cause B10 is not happening.
SEC Headlines 11/29/2012
November 29th, 2012
12:30 pm
[...] 32. Mark Bradley: “With the Big East in tatters, the Big Six of BCS leagues has been reduced to five.” [...]
Hal
November 29th, 2012
1:53 pm
Tech to the Big Ten would fill up the stands. Do you know how many people there are from the mid-west just over the border in Florida that would travel to Atlanta to see a game? A bunch. I know several that fly up to a game twice a year at Michigan. I would bet a big part of the Big Ten’s network subscriptions are in Florida.
odog
November 30th, 2012
1:39 am
acc title game tickets—going for $2 on stubhub!!! get them fast!!!
Seymour Butts
December 1st, 2012
8:08 pm
The ACC got SEXtino the POS Adulterer and the lowest ranked academic school..Must be getting desperate..
GT GRAD
December 2nd, 2012
2:38 pm
Big 10 (dumb name for a conference with more than 10 teams!!) would NO DOUBT rather have GT than Maryland……….the problem is GT is not interested…….PERIOD.
Mark Bradley suggesting the BIG 10 “picked” Maryland when they could have “picked” GT is simply ridiculous………any readers who believe this nonsense is ignorant. Refer to his 12:54PM entry where he tried to be slick with this intent in mind (while hiding behind a factually inaccurate Mark Blaudschun article)…….he probably laughed when he hit Submit Comment. Mark Bradley should be ashamed and is continuing his attempts to put GT in a negative light.
The BIG 10 will regret asking Maryland to be a member & The ACC is a better conference without Maryland!
Go GT!!!!
Adobe - Car Made of Clay - Bowl
December 3rd, 2012
3:26 pm
Good Luck
whassup
December 3rd, 2012
10:46 pm
The ACC is the 3th most watched conference in football but has only the 5th best TV contract. Swofford’s basketball-only myopia has limited the ACC’s revenue. He needs to be replaced by a football czar if the league is going to get its due. The presidents needs to wake up.
As far as markets, how can any conference compete with the ACC on the east coast ? The conference owns the entire seaboard. Atlanta may be considered an SEC market but there is no other city in the SEC market of any size.
whassup
December 3rd, 2012
10:49 pm
The ACC is the 3th most watched conference in football but has only the 5th best TV contract. Swofford’s basketball-only myopia has limited the ACC’s revenue. He needs to be replaced by a football czar if the league is going to get its due. The presidents needs to wake up.
As far as markets, how can any conference compete with the ACC on the east coast ? The conference owns the entire seaboard. Atlanta may be considered an SEC market but there is no other city in the SEC of any size.
whassup
December 3rd, 2012
10:55 pm
Fisher’s attitude about FL State deserving a BCS bowl is hilarious. But its much easier to understand than the attitude of ESPN which prays for Notre Dame and FSU to both be nat champs every year. Again this fall, for the 15th consecutive year, the media will predict FSU to be among the top 5 in preseason polls. Against Tech and Florida, they didn’t look like a top 25 team. They should discount their tickets. They were much more embarrassing to the conference than Tech in the Charlotte game this weekend.