The Falcons are 6-0, but certain other numbers don’t add up

Mike Smith and VP of Communications Reggie Roberts leave to check the stats. (AP photo)

Mike Smith and Falcons VP of communications Reggie Roberts exit to check the stats. (AP photo)

There’s only one unbeaten NFL team, and it’s based in Flowery Branch. And we know, courtesy of Bill Parcells, that in the NFL you’re as good as your record says you are, which would suggest that the Falcons are flat-out great. But here’s where we run the numbers, and numbers, as we also know, can be pesky things.

The biggest number, duh, is 6-0. The Falcons have never been undefeated this deep into a season in their previous 46 years of doing business. But here’s another number: 11-21. That’s the combined record of the six teams the Falcons have beaten. Of those six, only San Diego is above .500. (And the 3-2 Chargers play Denver on Monday night.) This wasn’t entirely unexpected. The Falcons’ schedule always seemed tougher on the far side of the bye week. To look again, however, is to wonder.

We all thought Philadelphia and Dallas and New Orleans — the Falcons’ next three opponents — would be stout. The Eagles are 3-3, the Cowboys 2-3, the Saints 1-4. Check now and you’ll see that the Falcons are scheduled to play only two more games against teams that currently hold a winning record, and both of those games (against the Cardinals and the Giants) will be played here.

Yes, this is all subject to sudden change. Nobody expects the Saints to finish 4-12, and nobody expects Philly and Dallas and Detroit to sputter forever. But the 6-0 Falcons could stand a test, and it might be a while before another arrives.

Why does a 6-0 team require testing? Because, if you check the stats, the Falcons don’t look 6-0 good. They look, on paper if not on the field, not quite as imposing the 10-6 Falcons of last season.

The 2012 Falcons rank 15th in total offense, down from 10th in 2011. This team is 21st in total defense, down from 12th last season. A year ago they were eighth in passing, 17th in rushing; this year they’re 10th and 25th. Last season they were 20th in passing defense, sixth in rushing defense; these Birds are 11th and 27th. For those keeping score, the 2012 Falcons have improved over 2011 in exactly one of those six major categories.

Figure Filberts insist the most important football stat is Yards Per Pass Attempt. The Falcons have improved from 7.3 YPA to 7.4 on offense, while opponents’ YPA has risen from 7.2 to 7.6. (The offensive number ranks 15th in the league, the defensive one 21st.) On the bright side, the Falcons have improved their third-down conversion percentage all the way around: The defense ranks 21st this year, up from 28th in 2011; the offense ranks fifth, up from sixth.

If you’re looking for numbers to support 6-0, start here: The Falcons are tied with New England for the NFL lead in turnover margin, and they’ve been called for the fewest penalties of any team. (They were fifth and 10th last season.) New coordinators Dirk Koetter and Mike Nolan haven’t had a transforming effect on the yardage-based stats, but the impression — and it’s borne out by these key indices — is of a better-coached team. More concrete indicators: The Falcons are scoring 3.4 more points and yielding 3.1 fewer points than they did under 2011 management.

Here we pause for an emphatic disclaimer, offered by Richard Seymour, the Oakland defensive tackle who was once a New England Patriot (and before that a Georgia Bulldog). After the Raiders outgained the Falcons 474 yards to 286 but lost 23-20, Seymour told reporters: “I’ve done a lot of different things in my career in wins where statistically it all doesn’t line up. But stats are for losers. If you want to pay attention to statistics, go ahead. The only stat that matters is wins and losses.”

That’s true. Also true is this: The 11-5 Falcons of 2008 were beaten in the playoffs by the 9-7 Cardinals; the 13-3 Falcons of 2010 were upset in the playoffs by the 10-6 Packers, and the 10-6 Falcons of 2011 were undone by the 9-7 Giants. So sometimes you aren’t quite what your record says you are.

And what does this team’s architect say? This was general manager Thomas Dimitroff, speaking Monday morning: “We’re an evolving team that is 6-0. We’re a team that has shown a lot of resilience, and that’s an indication that we’ve matured.”

It is. The nice thing about winning all the time is that it becomes second nature. At winning, these Falcons are batting 1.000.

Further reading: This week’s Heat Check, with the Falcons chief among our local hotties.

By Mark Bradley

119 comments Add your comment

DawgNole

October 16th, 2012
2:22 pm

DieHardFalconsFan!!!!
October 16th, 2012
1:57 pm

People can say whatever they want about the falcons. We just need to watch and see how they do the rest of the season. No matter how well they play there will always be hatters! We will win a playoff game this year and more! GO FALCONS!!!!!
___________________

Yes, there will always be “hatters.” And they will always be mad.

Mark Bradley

October 16th, 2012
2:55 pm

OK, I laughed at that one, DawgNole.

DAWG Fan In AL

October 16th, 2012
3:01 pm

I’ve been a Falcons fan since 1971 (when I was 12 years old), and the big difference this year is what Mr. T.D. noted in this column that cannot be measured by any statistic: resilience. I’ve seen too many Falcons teams (and fans) just give up when something goes wrong. Example: Matt Ryan has a pass knocked in the air that happens to be intercepted by the Raiders – which could have just as easily come down in an Atlanta receiver’s hands. This team is not letting those bad luck-type of things get under their skin. This team does not give up. If you don’t give up, good things will happen. Case in point: In the 4th Qtr, Matt Ryan bounces a pass off a Raider helmet that DOES land in Harry Douglas’ hands. This team knows it has enough talent/ability to overcome those bad breaks that are going to happen in any game, and it takes advantage of the lucky breaks when they happen.

Big Crimson 75

October 16th, 2012
4:13 pm

You can’t do better than 6&0.

True Falcon Fan

October 16th, 2012
4:34 pm

Mark: There is one thing for sure, the Falcons are the “Champions of the AFC West div”!

All the nay sayers can pin that fact on the wall.

Go Falcons — Eaglettes “ConVICT” is next

Matt "CHOKE" Ryan

October 16th, 2012
8:17 pm

MARK

I beg the differ…….The numbers do add up………

As in 1st 6 opponents 11-21 record……..

FRAUDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS Like I have been saying………..

Now everyone wants to jump on the Matt “CHOKE” Ryan bandwagon…

HA HA :)

Curley

October 16th, 2012
11:27 pm

Bradley YOU SUK.
You skew the numbers worse than Moore did,
and sound like Joe Buck.
GTFOOAtlanta.

Even Cleveland would not put up with your
farm animal BS.
Just Leave Atlanta, anywhere but here would suit us all
just fine.

DieHardFalconsFan!!!!

October 16th, 2012
11:29 pm

Its funny how people say Matt Ryan chokes but it looks like to me that if it wasn’t for him we would not b 6-0. Since Ryan took over the falcons have had nothing but success in the regular season. When it comes to the playoffs it was bad play calling and we had no screen pass really and no one ran slant routes. We have a better defensive coordinator and offensive coordinator. We will win a playoff game and then some! Our O-line has to get better too! RISE Up!!!!!

Esquire

October 17th, 2012
9:07 am

“Football Outsiders” has given the MIGHTY MIGHTY ATLANTA FALCONS the highest percentage odds of all teams to “WIN” the Super Bowl.

P Rose

October 17th, 2012
9:19 am

Choke sure likes to misuse the word “fraud!”

Here’s a little English lesson for you, Choke!

fraud |frôd|
noun
wrongful or criminal deception intended to result in financial or personal gain

Sort of like when your boy Vick lied under oath in federal court to try to avoid losing the millions of dollars the Falcons had paid him to read playbooks and watch game films, in order to develop into an elite NFL quarterback, which he never did!

HA HA :)

Roben

October 17th, 2012
10:10 am

Archie has the best comments up here. You can only play who’s on your schedule. The Falcons will not be able to get away with 3 or more turnovers against good teams.

Stop the Madness

October 17th, 2012
11:20 am

The ONLY numbers that matter are 6-0. The NFL creates the schedule so the NFC South teams are basically playing the majority of the same teams–with the exception of one or two. Is it the Falcons problem because they have beaten teams that are on their schedule? Is it the Falcon’s fault those teams have losing records? No, one has nothing to do with the price of tea in China. So if all of those teams had winning percentages above .500 then would that make the Falcons appear to be the predestined Superbowl team? No, all it means is that they have beaten all 6 of the teams played at this point of the season–same as them beating teams with losing records. Stop with all these silly numbers spinning. Fact of the matter is any team can beat any other team, any week based on how they matchup, plan for, and elevate their level of play (Giants make SF look silly/Seattle stops the Patriots). Who are the better teams on paper?

Stop the Madness

October 17th, 2012
11:20 am

Or should I say…who WERE the better teams on paper?

PlanB

October 17th, 2012
1:42 pm

Pretty sure we are not going to have a perfect record and we may loose the 1st game in the playoffs but isn’t it nice to have a team that wins and has a chance in post season play. We have gone many years with loosing records. What we have now is great. Keep it up Falcons!!!!!

Matt "CHOKE" Ryan

October 17th, 2012
4:55 pm

Stop the Madness

October 17th, 2012
11:20 am
The ONLY numbers that matter are 6-0

________________________________________

Actually it doesn’t.

The Patriots were 18-0 and lost to the Giants in the

superbowl.

Last year the Giants were 9-7 and won another superbowl.

FRAUDSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

HA HA :)

MFranklin

October 18th, 2012
9:40 am

Pretty bad when your local writers appear to be job hunting at ESPN.

Eric C.

October 18th, 2012
2:48 pm

Falcons have the best FG kicker in the league…that is important when there are so many close games in the NFL.

[...] Of course, there may still be some of you who revert back to Atlanta Journal-Constitution Mark Bradley's argument that the Falcons have defeated just weak teams thus far. [...]

Falcon James

October 21st, 2012
12:22 pm

Here is the way the numbers stack up to the Saint 1 and 5 record

2-4= Better than the Saint
3-3= Better than the Saint
4-2= Better than the Saint
5-1= Better than the Saint
6-0= Better than all other NFL Team including the Saint.

In taking a closer look, the Falcon are, hands down, way better than the Saint!