The BCS title game: When SEC domination became full-blown overkill. (AP photo)
I’d long since given up on the prospects of a college football playoff. The bowls were too powerful, I told myself. (Note that the word “bowl” comes before “championship” in “BCS.”) For all the hue and cry from the chattering class and the huddled masses, I figured nothing would ever get done.
Now I’m thinking something might.
Might, I said. Might.
I’m thinking the sight of two SEC teams playing for the BCS title was enough to push the leagues that didn’t want any part of a playoff into the we-need-to-reassess camp. I’m thinking that the Pac-12 and the Big Ten, the two leagues who persisted in seeing the Rose Bowl as the only postseason game that mattered, are getting antsy over being marginalized.
(The joke among college football writers has long been that this is the only sport held hostage by a parade. Meaning the Tournament of Roses thingy.)
Back in 2008, SEC commissioner Mike Slive, of all people, proposed a four-team playoff. ACC commissioner John Swofford seconded the motion. The other BCS league commissioners — of the (then) Pac-10, the Big Ten, the Big 12 and the Big East — all resisted. So did Notre Dame, that entity unto itself.
OK, that was then. This week Big Ten commissioner Jim Delany told reporters in New Orleans: “Four years ago, five of us didn’t want to have the conversation. Now we all want to have the conversation.”
It’s not just that the SEC has come to hog the BCS title game to the extent that nobody else even got to play in the latest installment. It’s that the BCS has skewed the whole postseason. Attendance was down 2.1 percent through the first 31 (of 35) bowls this season, and anyone who was in Raymond James Stadium for Georgia’s loss to Michigan State in the Outback Bowl could tell something was off.
These were ranked teams that had won divisions in BCS conferences, and attendance was announced as 49,429, which would have ranked as the second-smallest gathering in the 17 years that Outback Steakhouse has sponsored the game. According to the Tampa Bay Times, however, actual attendance was 40,022 — the sort of gate that Georgia fans would mock if it occurred, say, in a regular-season game at Bobby Dodd Stadium.
Of those 35 bowls, 33 were carried by ESPN/ABC. The good news is that ESPN/ABC pays big for the rights. The bad news is that much of the bowl season has become a couch-and-big-screen sport. No fans are more rabid than those of big-time college football teams, but those fans have surely begun to ask: Why pay $1,000 to travel to a game that doesn’t even bear the BCS imprint?
Think of it this way: The NCAA basketball tournament includes 68 teams; imagine if 66 of those were summarily demoted to the NIT while the top two seeds got to advance directly to the title game. That’d be a form of madness, all right — just not the March variety.
The BCS “system” claims to enfranchise 10 of the 70 bowl teams, but only two of those 10 get to play a game that really matters. And now, with its latest championship game, the BCS pared the list of “haves” in college football to one: The SEC rules, and everyone else is left to drool.
Great for the SEC, but bad for overall business. While we here in the Deep South paid rapt attention to the doings Monday night in the Superdome, much of the rest of the nation looked elsewhere. Alabama-LSU drew the third-smallest rating of the 14 BCS title games. Apparently not everyone in the world delights in field goals.
(As the web site Awful Announcing notes, ratings for the five BCS games were down 13 percent from last season. And Clemson’s epic loss to West Virginia in the Orange Bowl was the lowest-rated BCS game ever.)
Headed into the 2011 season, it was hard to imagine the SEC consolidating gains. Given that it had won the previous five BCS titles, how could it get any bigger? Well, it did. It didn’t just produce the national champ this time; it also generated the runner-up.
There comes a point, however, when absolute power becomes obscene overkill. Big-time college football could have reached that point. The SEC already has one championship game. (For which, not incidentally, the eventual BCS champ did not qualify.) It doesn’t need another. If the Big Ten, long the most intransigent of the playoff holdouts, is willing to change, then change might indeed be at hand.
Might, I said. Might.
By Mark Bradley
214 comments Add your comment
Jimmy Crack
January 12th, 2012
9:55 am
Go figure, Mark, that there is such an anti-SEC sentiment nationally, yet who was the conference that offered up the playoff scenario that no one wanted to discuss? The SEC.
robodawg
January 12th, 2012
10:09 am
ESPN has way too much sway on college football. Maybe they’re getting what they deserve.
Alphare
January 12th, 2012
10:17 am
robodawg,
I thought everybody just watches games, not ESPN. I don’t watch them unless there are games there. Turn away when games are off.
Gbal
January 12th, 2012
11:31 am
8 team playoff – I think it should be the top 8, per the current BCS ranking system (nothing better), regardles of confrence, but I can assure you that several confrences are not going to let that happen. The main reason they are giving it consideration now is because two teams from the same confrence were in the two team playoff this year. They want to insure that their confrence champions have a shot in the future.
So I would settle for now with (and tweak down the road).
8 team playoff –
6 BCS confrence winners automatically qualify IF they finish in in the top 10 per the BCS ranking system.
2 additional spots filled based on BCS rankings.
If a confrence winner fails to qualify due to rankings, the next highest ranked team will fill the open slot.
>>>>
The 7 highest bidding or BCS bowls to host the games. First round Mid Dec, Second 2 weeks later, final Jan.
Other bowls stil exist on their own schedule and will continue to be as meaningless as ever but a reward to the schools.
The season is not really exdended. Yes there would be either 1 or 2 more games for 4 teams. 70 or so bowl teams continue practicing thru December any way.
Gbal
January 12th, 2012
11:36 am
And bet the house, TV ratings would be up on all 7 of the BCS Bowl games. Attandance??? Now thats a tough one. Dont know that a crowd could follow their team for 3 potential games?
Best would be to have the first round at the highest seeds school. Let the Bowl come to the campuses!
Gbal
January 12th, 2012
11:39 am
p
rick
January 12th, 2012
11:58 am
Automatic conference qualifiers is not the answer, as we saw this year with the pathetic teams that played in the Big East and ACC. The depth of the SEC would have had at least four teams better than the conference champs of each of those conferences, and if you don’t believe it look at what South Carolina did to Clemson. I think the answer is at least 16 teams in the playoff, seeded by a selection committee, and preferably 32 to where anyone who even remotely thinks they have a chance gets in. First round games are played at the higher seeded teams home, where they will for sure play before a sellout, then the round of 16 goes to traditional bowl sites like Miami, LA, Dallas, New Orleans, Phoenix, Atlanta, and then add in Indy, and either Minneapolis or Detroit. Guaranteed sell outs, lots of excitement, TV ratings off the chart, and huge money to the colleges just like the basketball tournament. If you aren’t good enough to be one of the best 32 teams in the country, you shouldn’t be playing in the postseason anyway. I watched three bowl games this year, the Outback, the Fiesta, and the rematch, just so I could see Les Miles get his hat handed to him.
FLA DAWG.
January 12th, 2012
12:11 pm
Alphare,
You don’t know what would have happened if Bama had to play an extra game or two.
Need Proof?
LSU BEAT THEM in regular season. Another team might have beaten them too.
You don’t know and neither do I but the fact is Bama benefited from the current system.
No hard feelings against The Tide – I greatly respect the team and am very confident they are the undisputed Champs.
GSUGRAD
January 12th, 2012
2:13 pm
I am pretty sure there is already a playoff in college football, at least I am pretty sure that is what the last 2 games I attended in Statesboro were, and pretty sure we got beat down in a semifinal game in North Dakota. Am I missing something?
Delbert D.
January 12th, 2012
4:03 pm
So, this would be the BCS Invitational Tournament (BIT). Since it would not include all conference champions, the winner should not be declared “NCAA Champion.” That is not really any better than the hare-brained scheme currently used.
FLA DAWG.
January 12th, 2012
5:20 pm
Even in high school football teams reach the playoffs by their win / loss record.
No one votes to determine who will play – it’s done by their win / loss record – period.
These are youngsters who may play SEVERAL additional games with no ill effect.
We don not have a playoff system in place when a conference winner is subject the the outcome of what is essentially an election by vote of people around the country to determine against whom that conference winner will play.
Ask Auburn Fans how they felt about their 2004 season. They win their division, they win the conference and do not get a shot at a Championship because they didn’t get enough votes!
Go figure.
FL DAWG
January 12th, 2012
9:16 pm
Alphare,
Where are you?
I guess you have nothing to say.
A better plan for college football – The Seattle Times | My Football Search
January 12th, 2012
10:00 pm
[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) [...]
College Football Nation: 2011-all-bowl-team – ESPN (blog) | My Football Search
January 13th, 2012
2:00 pm
[...] Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) [...]