
Maybe there'll be a touchdown scored the second time around. Then again ... (AP photo)
Nobody ever said the BCS made sense, and this year it makes less sense than … well, can you make less sense than zero? Alabama did not win its division and did not win its conference but could well be the national champion in a sport where we’re told Every Game Counts.
Actually, what this year’s serving of BCS glop tells us is that it’s good to have an aura. Nick Saban has an aura, albeit one of fire and brimstone, which means Alabama has an aura, which means Alabama got a nod it didn’t deserve.
Bama played its two toughest conference games — LSU and Arkansas — at home. It didn’t play either Georgia or South Carolina, the best teams in the SEC East. It played five teams that finished with a winning record, and one was Georgia Southern. The Tide beat three teams that finished the Top 25 of the BCS standings.
Oklahoma State played four such teams and won all four games. It played seven teams that finished with winning records. The Cowboys did, for mavens of minutiae, win their conference title. The knock on them is that they lost to unranked Iowa State. But they did lose on the road, and in overtime.
Alabama, the counter-argument goes, only lost in OT to the nation’s No. 1 team. But Alabama lost at home. Alabama was favored that night and couldn’t win. But because Alabama is coached by the dark lord Saban and because Alabama is from the SEC, which is the feeder league for BCS titlists, the Tide gets a second chance.
And this time the talking heads on ESPN, who make less sense with every week, had no problem with the concept of a rematch or the reality of a non-conference champion playing for the BCS crown. (Oddly enough, some of those same voices hooted down Georgia’s credentials in 2007. “Can’t consider a team that didn’t win its conference,” the ESPN choir harrumphed.) And Saturday night, moments after Oklahoma State finished routing Oklahoma, which entered the season ranked No. 1, some ESPN boys leaped at the chance to say, “Ah, that doesn’t really matter.”
“SportsCenter” opened with the highlights of the SEC title game and then Oklahoma State’s dismissal of its bitter rival. Then the Bristol anchors tossed, as they say in TV, to Brent Musburger and Kirk Herbstreit. Musburger, who had famously lobbied for Georgia Tech to be promoted above Colorado to No. 1 when calling Tech’s victory in the Citrus Bowl in January 1991, started with a little joke. What’s wrong with a rematch, he asked, and cited the extremely appropriate case study of Rocky Balboa versus Apollo Creed.
Then Herbstreit dismissed Oklahoma State by saying the Cowboys had lost in Ames, Iowa, and, more to the point, didn’t pass “the eyeball test.” Which made you wonder: How could Kirk Herbstreit know just how Oklahoma State had looked against Oklahoma? He (and Musburger) had been sitting in a booth in Charlotte, N.C., calling the ACC title game.
Because big-time college football has no playoff grid, ephemeral stuff like “the eyeball test” and someone’s opinion — yours, mine and especially Kirk Herbstreit’s — are allowed to hold disproportionate sway. Alabama won’t be playing for the (exceedingly mythical) national championship because it had a better season than Oklahoma State but because its has the stronger brand. It’s Alabama. It plays in the SEC. It’s coached by Saban. Good enough for me! Give that team a second chance!
And that’s what big-time college football has become — a game of brands, not reality. Is it mere coincidence that ESPN has a 15-year contract to carry SEC games? (ESPN also has a contract with the Big 12, Oklahoma State’s diminishing league, but the bigger Big 12 package is with Fox Sports.)
This was a year when opinion mattered. Five of the seven computer rankings had Oklahoma State above Alabama, but the Tide finished ahead in both human polls. Why? Because of the brand. You cannot tell me that if Alabama’s name were attached to Oklahoma State’s body of work and vice versa that the results wouldn’t have been different. We all know they would have.
And now we’re faced with this scenario: A winner of nothing save some eyeball test can split two games against another team … and be declared national champ. Some “system” this is.
By Mark Bradley
1,739 comments Add your comment
jjm
December 4th, 2011
8:24 pm
Playoff system!
SoCal UgaDawg
December 4th, 2011
8:26 pm
First
SoCal UgaDawg
December 4th, 2011
8:27 pm
Nick Saban & Bama are evil
Soccer Dawg
December 4th, 2011
8:28 pm
Cowboys was robbed!
Cobb Oxford
December 4th, 2011
8:28 pm
Right on, Mark. What a joke of a system. TV set this game. Oklahoma State and the fans of college football got screwed.
Dawg48
December 4th, 2011
8:28 pm
I smell some BcS going on!
Dave
December 4th, 2011
8:30 pm
BCS is such a joke. .It needs to go. They change their rules year by year. 5 years ago during the 2006 season and the argument was Michigan didn’t win its division so they shouldn’t get the rematch vs Ohio St for the game. Michigans only loss was to #1 Ohio St. Same thing this year, but now with Alabama it all of the sudden matters that Alabamas only loss was to #1 LSU, BCS is so far up the SEC’s @$$ that it is not even funny,
Dawg48
December 4th, 2011
8:30 pm
Nick saban should run for president GREAT politician!
The ESPNCAA had him politicking all Saturday morning!
Will
December 4th, 2011
8:31 pm
Thanks Espn for helping ruin college football !
SoCal UgaDawg
December 4th, 2011
8:31 pm
Cowpokes should get a split national championship if they win and Bama upsets LSU
Chi Town
December 4th, 2011
8:33 pm
Respect, Saban.
Randy
December 4th, 2011
8:34 pm
your a joke. the bcs was made to match the two best teams in the nation. its not even close between alabama and ok state in that regard.
01HAWK
December 4th, 2011
8:34 pm
ROLL TIDE ROLL
THEY CALL ALABAMA THE CRIMSON TIDE……………………………….Isn’t that what STEELY DAN stated.
RS Dawg
December 4th, 2011
8:34 pm
Does not really matter, LSU will be national champions. Probably should play Green Bay!!
Deja vu
December 4th, 2011
8:35 pm
Dead on, Mark. The undefeated Auburn brand in 2004 didn’t have the chance either when two teams were well qualified to play USC. One can only hope justice is served and the same result happens in the title* game.
DawgFan82
December 4th, 2011
8:35 pm
Georgia to the Outback versus Michigan State. Should be a good game.
Jason Cochran
December 4th, 2011
8:35 pm
Thanks #BCS for freeing up 3 hours of my life.. I have already seen this game – LSU was the winner..
Kim
December 4th, 2011
8:35 pm
Sour grapes!
Roll Tide Roll
jeff
December 4th, 2011
8:36 pm
Nobody watch the LSU vs Alabama game … And I meen NOBODY! Follow the money … what would happen??
Vicky
December 4th, 2011
8:37 pm
Should have been Oklahoma State playing LSU.. EVERYONE knows that. Boo Boo BCS…
JRock
December 4th, 2011
8:37 pm
Roll Tide Roll!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
steve
December 4th, 2011
8:37 pm
my home is ALABAMA, national championships, roll tide roll………….
Drew
December 4th, 2011
8:38 pm
It is a sad state of affairs when my favorit sport–college football–has such a broken and completely unfair mechanism for determining a champion. It hurts the sport, the athletes and the fans.
t
December 4th, 2011
8:38 pm
iowa state
Dawg48
December 4th, 2011
8:38 pm
What’s up with teams from Alabama trying to buy NC?
Auburn bought one last year big bad bama had to out do em and politic their way into this one!
I’m an SEC fan but this is a joke!
Scirone
December 4th, 2011
8:38 pm
The most ridiculous thing about the bcs is that ok state can lose to an unranked 6-4 team and only drop one spot
BEV
December 4th, 2011
8:39 pm
Get over it! Roll Tide Roll!
Robards
December 4th, 2011
8:39 pm
Mark, I dislike ‘Bama as much as you do. When Herbsteit talked about the eyeball test, he wasn’t just talking about last night. Okie State has the better resume. However, Alabama is better than the Cowboys by 14 points or so. Just the way it is. And although I don’t care for Georgia, LSU should have been played the Dawgs in ‘07, not the Buckeyes. Irrelevant for this year though.
swhite1951
December 4th, 2011
8:39 pm
The TV ratings for this “game” will be dismal nationwide, although they’ll be great in Louisiana and Alabama, two HUGE TV markets. This may be the beginning of the end of the BCS, one can only hope that after this fiasco even the coaches, ADs, and University presidents will start lobbying for some sort of playoff system. Which brings up a great trivia question: What are the only three sports in the world that don’t have a playoff? Horse racing, boxing, and NCAA Division 1 College Football. Every other sport has a playoff, and every other football division has a playoff. How do you spell BCS? Bowl Champion$hip $erie$…and that’s all it is. They really don’t care a bout the fans.
GT Fan
December 4th, 2011
8:39 pm
This is BS. I hate college football now. I freaking hate it.
J.J.M.
December 4th, 2011
8:40 pm
SoCal UgaDawg FAIL
swhite1951
December 4th, 2011
8:41 pm
Yo, Randy, learn to spell. Were you a product of the University of Alabama?
jeff
December 4th, 2011
8:42 pm
Dont watch … they will start caring!
Bama Grad
December 4th, 2011
8:42 pm
Had nothing to do with the brand. Bama is the more complete team. I don’t care how good their defense looked against a depleted OU offense last night – they gave up over 500 yards I believe in 3 different games this year including the loss to Iowa State. A team with that kind of defense doesn’t deserve a spot in the title game.
Dawg48
December 4th, 2011
8:43 pm
Espn guys said we need a plus one play off this year!
LSU already beat bama what more of a playoff do you need!
tulsabravo
December 4th, 2011
8:43 pm
To hell with college football. I won’t be watching any of this game.
RTR22
December 4th, 2011
8:44 pm
01 Hawk the SD tune is called Deacon Blues lol…… Roll Tide and if you dont like the selection DO NOT WATCH THE GAME. Look at reruns of your pathetic Auburn, Fla and Ga teams.
MB you are right about the Alabama brand name…. why drive a Kia when the Porsche is ready to roll
Tech Fan Since 1950
December 4th, 2011
8:44 pm
The BCS continues to be a fraud. Orin Hatch, President Obama, republicans and democrats and independents—–HELP!!! It may seem trivial to some, but what is going on between the big time college administrators and television networks in creating and maintaining the BCS is a national travesty. The current system is a con game. It reflects badly on this nation. Yes, there are many other pressing issues facing this nation, but having a legitimate selection (playoff) for college football seems like would be a no brainer.
JRock
December 4th, 2011
8:44 pm
get over it! Roll Tide!
brad
December 4th, 2011
8:45 pm
What a bunch of cry-babies. Suck it up, losers.
James Brown Celebrity Hot Tub Party
December 4th, 2011
8:45 pm
The best two teams are playing. Bama might even be favored. LSU would be a 12 point favorite over OSU. That being said, we do need a playoff system.
bamaman
December 4th, 2011
8:45 pm
Cry me a river, come play in the SEC week in and week out, tell me that you have a great team after running the gauntlet we play every week. Yes we lost at home in OT, just like OkIe State, but the difference is, LSU and Iowa State. We can’t help that our schedule did not have us playing S Carolina or Georgia, we rotate them every 2-3 years, so yes we do play them.
I am so tired of all the SEC haters, people get over it, play some teams that play defense, that is what wins Championships, not the high scoring offenses, why do you think it was 9-6, the No.’s 1 and 2 defenses provided a stalemate, neither of the remaining one loss teams could hold a candle to LSU or Alabama, they would be run out of the stadium, look over the last six years, only Oregon is the only team I can recall that had a decent game last year against Auburn and Cam.
I do feel bad for Ok. State, they had a great season and game against OK, but OK was playing withour several of their star players, wonder what the outcome would have been had they been healthy? I guess we will never know will we, congrats to Okie State on the Big 12 Championship, hopefully, they will get smart and get in a conference that plays not only offense, but defense and special teams, that is why Bama and LSU will battle it out and give the SEC its 6th straight BCS Title.
BCS is Crap
December 4th, 2011
8:46 pm
I will not watch the championship game, nor will I watch any espn show other than game footage. The ESPN talking heads and 90% of sports writer are to blame for this crap game. ESPN and the BCS is a plague on college football.
The NCAA is a joke too.
John
December 4th, 2011
8:46 pm
Just declare LSU national champion. Nobody else is close.
Realist
December 4th, 2011
8:46 pm
Hey swhite1951, gotta update your playoff system trivia question. European soccer leagues don’t have a playoff. Europe is still in the world.
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
8:46 pm
Mark,
“Alabama did not win its division and did not win its conference but could well be the national champion in a sport where we’re told Every Game Counts”.
BAMA didn’t win the division because the #1 team happens to be in the same division.
Yes, Every Game Counts. OSU lost 1 game, BAMA lost 1 game, and lost to the #1 team vs OSU lost to a 6-6 team.
todd grantham
December 4th, 2011
8:46 pm
Mark< do you think that either LSU or Bama would trade a backup offensive tackle to Georgia for Crowell?
TylerDyrden
December 4th, 2011
8:47 pm
Here come the crybabys, Alabama is ranked #2 on every poll and has been for a while. Their only loss was to #1 lsu by 3 in overtime. Oklahoma st had its oportunisty but lost to unranked Iowa state, cowboys robbed gimme a break. Let them get beat by Boise st in the fiesta bowl.
Dale
December 4th, 2011
8:47 pm
so incredibly biased, stupid article not even worth reading.
BCS terrorist
December 4th, 2011
8:48 pm
Great article Mark. Hit nail right on head. Saban and his bunch rule the SEC from a mountaintop of aura and marketability. Thanks for telling it like it is – Go Dawgs!
AB Adams
December 4th, 2011
8:48 pm
*YAWN*, Mr. Bradley……
The Tide would have rolled Georgia and South Carolina. Excuse me, but YOU did see what LSU did to the “Dawgs” didn’t you?
Um, how about these two words…………….. Iowa State. Enough, and I mean enough said…….
Realist
December 4th, 2011
8:48 pm
Hey Vicky, if everyone knows that Oklahoma State is more deserving, how come they were behind Alabama in all three human polls?
ramguy68
December 4th, 2011
8:49 pm
OK St had the chance to take the #2 position but failed miserably when they were beaten by a .500 Iowa St team. Well the Crimson Tide wasn’t beaten by a .500 team. They lost (barely) to the # 1 team. The BCS is supposed to pair the 2 best teams and they finally got it right. The ESPN talking heads were wrong in 2007 just as Bradley is today. In 2007 ESPN were just starting to grudgingly give the SEC the nod as the best conference. If they had got it right UGA wouldn’t have played against LSU. The SEC is just not a brand name. It’s the real deal.
tmc
December 4th, 2011
8:49 pm
Right on MB.
Also, if anyone says that Oklahoma, Texas or Nebraska of year’s past would have the same credentials as Oklahoma State (winning Big 12 w/ one loss). And Alabama’s same credentials (not winning division, conference and losing at home)…
There is NO Way Texas, Oklahoma or Nebraska would not be playing in the BCS championship. None.
It is just the next and latest peg in the ever-growing list of hypocrisies the NCAA has manipulated.
01HAWK
December 4th, 2011
8:49 pm
RTR22 ……………………………………I did not state anything about the name of the song. Look at the post. I just stated what is said in the song.
GET OVER IT ALREADY.
Brad K
December 4th, 2011
8:49 pm
Right On Mark
Stingtalk's daddy
December 4th, 2011
8:49 pm
Oklahoma State should be playing LSU not Bama, here we go again! By the way, UGA got their butts spanked!!! I speak for all at STINGTALK when I say “we should’ve beat the dawgs” and we have “one of the best coaches in the business with his own coaching style” so kiss that mutts!!!! Hope you enjoyed the spanking from LSU!!!!
rkjo
December 4th, 2011
8:49 pm
@ Randy, if you want to call someone a joke, maybe first you should learn the difference between “you’re” and “your.”
Mark Bradley
December 4th, 2011
8:50 pm
Turning off ESPN now. Can’t take any more.
Kris
December 4th, 2011
8:50 pm
LSU will win the National Championship!!!!!. They’re playing at our HOUSE this time in New Orleans not that awful pig path of a town in Tuscaloosa. GEAUX TIGERS!!!!!!!
wally
December 4th, 2011
8:51 pm
(BCS) who in the hell votes on this crap. I for one, will not watch none of the bowl games. I will boycott all colleges games and return to the NFL where if you win your in. Piss and shame on you asses. A BOISE STATE FAN AND YES MY TRUE NAME IS WALLY FROM IDAHO. Iam in the phone book also Wally Roath From Payette , IDAHO. GOT Screwed again BOISE STATE .
Robards
December 4th, 2011
8:51 pm
Mark, I dislike Saban and Alabama as much as you do. However, ‘Bama passes the eye test. By the way, Herbie wasn’t just talking about last night. He was talking about the season. Yeah, Okie State has the better resume but the Tide is 14 points better. So what do you do? I’d like to see schedules mattter, too, but it doesn’t. VT is in a BCS bowl!!!
Don R.
December 4th, 2011
8:52 pm
Mark: Thanks for your thoughts– wish you had published them BEFORE the announcement. Why do you call Saban ‘Satanic”? The BCS is REQUIRED to put the two best teams against each other. If OSU played LSU tomorrow– what would be the line? When Alabama plays LSU on the 9th– what will be the line? Your answer to this question tells the tale.
Boomer Sooner
December 4th, 2011
8:52 pm
Cant wait to see LSU beat Bama. Oh wait… WE ALREADY DID!!!
Ugadan
December 4th, 2011
8:53 pm
If OSU beats Iowa State, there is no controversy. At least in a battle of brands, T. Boone Pickens can’t buy enough commercials. That’s the thing about a famous brand…long after its advertisements, people will still buy it. There is no chance we will get a playoff in the next ten years, but if LSU wins again, and they should on a neutral field in Louisiana, this will all be moot.
ramguy68
December 4th, 2011
8:53 pm
If they had got it right UGA wouldn’t have played against LSU
Sorry but that should have read ithat if the BCS had got it right in 2007, UGA would have played LSU.
Georgia Dawg
December 4th, 2011
8:53 pm
The BS Championship!!! Alabama deserves nothing! I hope LSU “ROLLS” all over them, and to HADES with ESPN for their DOUBLE STANDARDS!
James Brown Celebrity Hot Tub Party
December 4th, 2011
8:53 pm
“the satanic Saban”? MB you are sorry excuse for a sportswriter. I will not boycott ESPN, but AJC, buh-bye.
walker1
December 4th, 2011
8:54 pm
bcs and espn r in bed together all a bunch of crap sec is so good thats all i hear about sorry but its just like the heisman its all bought off by the sec schools too tebow is not a heisman winner in my book just like reggie bush a bum bought and paid for by espn and a bunch of politicans
Ray
December 4th, 2011
8:54 pm
Yeah actually besides #1 vs #2 fiasco what about #11 vs. #13
I don’t think Virginia Tech deserves a bid to play in a BCS bowl at all let Boise St. play instead I just want them to be embarrassed finally is all.
Dawg48
December 4th, 2011
8:55 pm
Mark
How can herbie and the boys say we need a plus one?
LSU beat bama! Is that not the same as a plus one?
What a joke!
Eagle has landed
December 4th, 2011
8:56 pm
Wow Mark, best article ever.
So a team that allowed more points to a FCS foe than another other FBS opponent all season is allowed into the MNF game? WTF?
his
December 4th, 2011
8:57 pm
this matchup is a fing travisty… play off system anyone?
Stingtalk's daddy
December 4th, 2011
8:57 pm
Walker1 you got issues son. You must be a mutt.
Cry baby cry
December 4th, 2011
8:57 pm
Bradley, you really showed your ignorance when you stated that Alabama didn’t even play the best two teams from the east. Did you not see how the best team from the east got massacred last night? Keep crying, UGA would have placed a distant fourth place in the west and won’t compete any time soon.
bamaman
December 4th, 2011
8:58 pm
One more thing, the BCS pits the No.’s 1 and 2 teams in the championship, regardless of conference and division, Bama could not help they and LSU are in the same division, the Big 12 sent OK, was that fair after they did not win their championship? It does happen, all the other 1 loss teams had their chance and blew it when they lost, that is why Bama worked its way back in, Okie St. was just a little short, the numbers between 2 and 3 were almost insurmountable, all year Bama and LSU have been No.’s 1 & 2 by a pretty wide margin, that is why Bama is in. Ok State was 5th in both the AP and Coaches polls last week if I am not mistaken, if they had been 3rd, they would have passed Bama, I feel for the Okie State players, it stinks, I am for a playoff too, but the BCS did what it was supposed to do.
BCSBound
December 4th, 2011
8:58 pm
Bottom line, the 2 BEST teams in the Nation are playing for the title. The fact that Bradley has to resort to name calling to try to make his point is pathetic. ROLL TIDE ROLL!
Stingtalk's daddy
December 4th, 2011
8:59 pm
This sux, another low scoring game with both defenses holding each other back and forth. FUN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
FIFES
December 4th, 2011
8:59 pm
Oh My, sounds like some one is jealous of the SEC teams! Well, what are you going to be saying if AL beats LSU and does win the National Championship? Since they were barley beaten by the No. 1 team in overtime I think the No. 2 ranking is fair and entitles them to play the No.1 team again. Now if Oklahoma State was undefeated I could understand the complaints. AL is a better team than LSU and a way better team than Oklahoma State….sometimes the truth hurts. So, Mr. Bradley, I am sorry if your favorite team was not chosen as number 2 but if you HAD the fan base and stronger “brand” as it was called…..not to mention “the better team” you team would be No. 2 and going to the National Championship game. So please, stop ranting and raving about your feelings being hurt!!!!
bamaguy
December 4th, 2011
8:59 pm
The purpose of the BCS is to ensure that, despite conference bowl alignments, the two best teams play for the national championship.
Mission Accomplished
SEC Oracle
December 4th, 2011
9:00 pm
If LSU wins they are national champions all by themselves. If Alabama wins it will not the national champion. It will either be be a co-national championship with LSU unless Okie State beats Stanford, then it will be a 3-way national championship with LSU and Alabama. What a joke.
Ulysses Grant
December 4th, 2011
9:01 pm
Appomattox Court House April, 1985–Southeastern Conference loses the only National Championship. They’ve been whiny losers ever since.
Steve - USA
December 4th, 2011
9:01 pm
Mark,
They invented these machines that can record programs. So someone can actually record a football game and watch it at a later time.
Try Best Buy or Costco, I am sure they can explain it to you.
Grandmaster JeJe
December 4th, 2011
9:01 pm
Nice blog.
Kudos, MB.
Stingtalk's daddy
December 4th, 2011
9:01 pm
BAMA GONNNN GET THEEEIR BUTTTS HANDED TO EM LSU GONNN TAKE CARE OF BIDNESS AGAAAAIN!!!!
Bobby Dodd
December 4th, 2011
9:01 pm
Wonderful, we get to celebrate the practice of oversigning and Les Miles / Nick Saban ruining a few handful of young mens’ lives every year.
Hurt Kurbstreit
December 4th, 2011
9:02 pm
Not so fast my friends! I think the BCS got it right. I’m an SEC East guy but I think LSU and Alabama are the two best teams in college football. Bama didn’t win their division because they lost in OT to the best team in college football. Sure, I can feel for OK St., but until we get a playoff this is the best we can come up with. I’m not getting worked up about it.
Tyler
December 4th, 2011
9:03 pm
Are you kidding me? This article is ridiculous. Alabama’s one loss came to the number 1 team in the nation and those roles could easily be reversed. There already was a playoff and Ok State lost to a 6-6 team. If they could have beat Iowa State then no one would argue that they are deserving to play for the championship against LSU, but they didn’t.
Mark Bradley
December 4th, 2011
9:03 pm
Thanks, Grandmaster.
WHAT?
December 4th, 2011
9:04 pm
Speaking of brands . . . the BCS is fading quickly and losing credibility faster than a Kardashian wedding. WTF? IF Bama does beat LSU, there will always be an asterisk right next to their “W”. Bama has not earned a shot to be in the NCG. Total load ‘o crap. Good night.
Stingtalk's daddy
December 4th, 2011
9:05 pm
I enjoy your blog too mark!!! I speak for all us stingtalkers when I say LSU is the best, and Oklahoma State should be in the BCS game with them. FTW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Alice
December 4th, 2011
9:05 pm
Do these idiots think Alabama paid somebody off? Do they think Saban was NOT gonna say he felt his team should NOT be in the BCS championship game? I can hear him now……”yeah, we lost to the #1 team in OT and OK State lost to….Iowa State”? “Are you frigging kidding me? Iowa State? “Oh yes, we should for sure step aside and let OKIE STATE take our place then….by all means!”
In the game that I saw back in November between Bama and LSU, Bama beat the crap out of LSU, should have won by 20……War Eagle-
Mark Bradley
December 4th, 2011
9:05 pm
Thanks to you, tood, Stingtalk’s daddy.
tmc
December 4th, 2011
9:06 pm
NCAA= joke
BCS= joke
Bowl system= joke
ESPN= joke
When can we get rid of all of these? OSU should start the revolution…
I bet a lot will follow.
bamaguy
December 4th, 2011
9:06 pm
And no matter what the outcome, there will be yet another crystal football presented to an SEC team not named “Georgia.” Crystal footballs all around you: Florida, Tennessee, LSU, Alabama, Auburn and yet not a one in Athens.
The two best teams in the nation are going to play for the national championship. Period. End of discussion. The BCS did its job.
AlabamaRamblinwreck
December 4th, 2011
9:08 pm
Fact: sa(b)an’s birthday is all hallows eve…not a coincidence….Oct 31….many more “not coincidences” related to the prince of darness…
Georgia Dawg
December 4th, 2011
9:08 pm
Mark, right on!!! Kirk Herbstreit is a legend in his OWN mind! I still remember his VD (verbal diarrhea) from 2007. I will not watch ESPN commentary for the remainder of this season–if ever–and I may not watch a repeat of a championship that LSU has already won!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BCS is Crap
December 4th, 2011
9:08 pm
The NCAA officals are getting too much money from the BCS to grow a sack and install a playoff system.
JRock
December 4th, 2011
9:09 pm
Roll Tide! here comes number 14!
GFF
December 4th, 2011
9:09 pm
Well said!
SEC Fact Finder
December 4th, 2011
9:09 pm
OKSU had the every open door needed to play in the BCSCG. However, with that opportunity being right in front of them, they took a loss to a Iowa St( which in SEC terms is a Vanderbilt equivalent).
The system is not fair as it currently sits, however the best two teams in the country are playing on January 9th and there is no other way to look at.
ramguy68
December 4th, 2011
9:09 pm
Well at least all of the people that are drinking the haterade will be happy that a SEC team will finally lose a BCS Championship game.
Sid Hill
December 4th, 2011
9:09 pm
Your jealousy is showing pretty badly, Mark.
MJS4BAMA
December 4th, 2011
9:10 pm
Sorry it took so long to chime in with all of you crybabies. It was hard to type with all “13″ of my “National Championship” rings on.
Oh, and as to what one of you cow proders said about ALABAMA being on a mountain…………….get your facts straight.
Thats our trophy case! Roll Tide Roll!
GT GRAD
December 4th, 2011
9:12 pm
The BCS system is simply ridiculous. OK State should be playing LSU for the NC. What happens if Alabams wins 9-6 against LSU on January 9th…………would we have a split National Championship??
We should all keep calling for an 8 team playoff system! 8 vs. 1, 7 vs. 2, 6 vs. 3 and 5 vs. 4. Use four of the BCS games for the first round. The four winners play two weeks later and then the two remaining teams play two weeks later (the weekend prior to the Superbowl). All existing bowl games remain in place and NCAA Football fans get three additional HIGH PROFILE/MUST SEE games! It is a absolute no brainer!
Taco Meat
December 4th, 2011
9:12 pm
I agree. What a complete JOKE the BCS has become!!
Sloan
December 4th, 2011
9:14 pm
I would prefer to see LSU vs. OKie State. Not because I think Alabama is a lesser team than Okie State, but because LSU has already passed that test at Tuscaloosa! And Bama failed it. No, I would rather LSU put an a$$ whipping on Okie State to show the naysayers just how superior they really are!
Dunaway
December 4th, 2011
9:14 pm
osu lost to a unranked team bama lost to the #1 ranked team osu aint got a defense to stop lsu or a offense to score against them the system is designed to put the two best teams against one another and thats what it did osu wouldn’t have a chance in hell against lsu in new orleans and like it or not the sec is the hardest confrence and 9 times out of 10 the best the bama lsu game was true hard nose football with 2 evenly matched teams battleing it out who really wanted to watch lsu just man handle osu for 4 quarters but cry all u want you gotta settle for #3 just be happy you ranked that high RDT!
No Rematch Please
December 4th, 2011
9:14 pm
Mark,
What do you think of Virginia Tech being in the Sugar Bowl?
P.S. Couldn’t agree more about Bama in the NC game. Great blog!
Johnny Tucats
December 4th, 2011
9:16 pm
For those of you that want a playoff system…I present you with what you would get in the finals nearly every year: SEC v. SEC.
bamaguy
December 4th, 2011
9:16 pm
Does anyone, emotions and past BCS decisions aside, seriously think Oklahoma State is the second best team in the nation? LSU blew the doors off everyone they played, with one exception. They beat Alabama by a field goal in overtime.
The two best teams, in 2011, will play for the national championship. If LSU played Oklahoma State, it would be a repeat of LSU/Georgia, except worse.
Mark Bradley
December 4th, 2011
9:16 pm
I’m shocked about Virginia Tech, No Rematch.
01HAWK
December 4th, 2011
9:16 pm
BAMA had an AURA long before SABAN came to BAMA.
Winningest program in the SEC
6TH winningest program in college football
JEALOUS
JEALOUS
JEALOUS
JEALOUS
GET OVER IT
Herschel Talker
December 4th, 2011
9:17 pm
MB:
“And this time the talking heads on ESPN, who make less sense with every week, had no problem with the concept of a rematch or the reality of a non-conference champion playing for the BCS crown. (Oddly enough, some of those same voices hooted down Georgia’s credentials in 2007. “Can’t consider a team that didn’t win its conference,” the ESPN choir harrumphed.) And Saturday night, moments after Oklahoma State finished routing Oklahoma, which entered the season ranked No. 1, some ESPN boys leaped at the chance to say, “Ah, that doesn’t really matter.””
This is all you need to say. That jerk Herbstreit changed his opinion, hosing us in 2007, but giving it to Bama this year. ESPN is a disgrace.
THIS IS MARK BRADLEY’S BEST COLUMN EVER! BRILLIANT STUFF, MB!!!
HT
DetroitBraves
December 4th, 2011
9:17 pm
Absolutely fantastic Mark! Lost in all this is how not fair (the ongoing theme of college football) this is for LSU. Why on Earth should they have to beat the same team twice? I also wonder what the national title game would be if Oklahoma and OSU were to somehow switch their bodies of work. Maybe Alabama and the SEC still wins out but Oklahoma and Stoops does have a brand as well. So much for the notion that the BCS makes the regular season a playoff.
Coffee Bluff DAWG
December 4th, 2011
9:17 pm
SEC Fact Finder,
I agree with you that AL is a better match-up with LSUand better than Okie St . If AL wins they’ll be 1-1 for the season so who is nat’l champ?
Wouldn’t they have to play a 3rd game tie breaker? How can you say that AL is better if they go 1-1?
01HAWK
December 4th, 2011
9:17 pm
I guess it is fitting since BAMA and LSU started the SEC.
jod
December 4th, 2011
9:18 pm
the ncaa is in bed with espn, who is in bed with the SEC. if u don’t think the system is rigged, you are mistaken. all about $$. what a load of crap.
whats a three point shot worth ?
December 4th, 2011
9:18 pm
lol…The SEC bought and paid for this……OKSt got robbed !! half of America will check out and not watch. I wont…
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
9:19 pm
Does anyone, emotions and past BCS decisions aside, seriously think Oklahoma State is the second best team in the nation?
I do. Prove me wrong.
evil empire
December 4th, 2011
9:19 pm
been tired of ESPN for a while…hoping NBC Sports taking over Versus will mount some kind of challenge to those rectums in Bristol, Connecticut…the way they shove that stupid NBA crap down our throat is sickening enough…too many smug yankees there for me to watch…
BIG MIKE
December 4th, 2011
9:19 pm
Good article Mark. All I can say is, it’s about time someone with a voice “CALLED LIKE IT IS”. Follow the money and you’ll see why ESPN has more sway than any one entity should have. They can beat the drums and override even the computers with massive support for their teams of choice. That’s not media and they don’t report news. They are in the business of making news and money. It’s time the three branches of our government got involved and put a stop to this corruption.
ESPN, with their greed, has gone over the top this year and showed their cards without fear of reprecussion. They probably make more money on DIVISION 1A College Football than any other sporting event on the market. That’s their bread and butter. It’s what allows them to employ all these ‘talking heads’ or spin meisters (and they have an army of them). They start the spin long before the season starts, too. This ensures that the teams they favor begin the year in the top 10, so a loss can be overcome by the end of the year.
Doesn’t it occur to anyone that all of their employees have the same screwed up opinioned. This isn’t a no brainer, it’s a toss-up. Yet they all have the same opinion concerning Alabama getting a second shot. If one of them spoke otherwise, you probably wouldn’t see them back next year.
daddo
December 4th, 2011
9:19 pm
Daddo knows. Listen to Daddo.
Just the most fair and objective facts.
You Fifth Place Georgians go off to your nobody cares bowl.
Alabama playing for yet another national title.
Georgia doesn’t have a defensive player who could start at Bama.
Bama has best defense in college history.
Bama will win number 14.
Not a single running back at Georgia would PLAY at Bama.
Georgia recruiting in the tank ranked 30th by Scout.
Georgia about to extend contracts for horrible coaches…..hahahahahaha.
Georgia so bad you guys shouldn’t even have an opinion on this topic.
Your fans, like your team, doesn’t matter.
Listen to Daddo. Daddo knows football.
Just the most fair and objective facts.
Johnny Tucats
December 4th, 2011
9:20 pm
Who got robbed in 2004 when USC pounded “mighty” Oklahoma? Auburn! The BCS remembers that one, apparantly.
Bart Simpson
December 4th, 2011
9:21 pm
Anyone who is being unbiased knows in their heart LSU would beat OKST by 42-13 or something like that. Do we really want another SEC vs whoever blowout in the NC?
Johnny Tucats
December 4th, 2011
9:21 pm
Enter your comments here
Skitty Fritty
December 4th, 2011
9:22 pm
Bama didn’t even win their division much less their conference. Bear Bryant would turn down the offer to play for the title because he would say you have to win your conference.
The BCS is officially dead to me now.
WHAT?
December 4th, 2011
9:22 pm
This has nothing to do with jealousy. I would feel the exact way if LSU had lost at home to Alabama, and got a shot at the title. This is all about knowing what BS looks like and calling it for what it is. Total load ‘o crap!
tmc
December 4th, 2011
9:22 pm
LSU vs OSU is not about anti Alabama.
It’s about what has been a precedent over the last several years.
It’s about what has been said by the pundit’s for similar situations.
It’s about what kind of message it sends to all the schools like OSU.
The NCAA changes the rules whenever they see fit so they can make as much money as possible… smaller schools or programs be damned. And there is nothing anyone can do about it. They’ve been doing for years in the bowl game selections… they’ve just transferred it to the BCS Championship selection.
Jake
December 4th, 2011
9:23 pm
I will never watch this game. Total fix to sell more tickets and commercials! What a joke! You can’t win a NC without winning you conference! PERIOD!!!!!!!
Old Dawg
December 4th, 2011
9:23 pm
16-team play-off, just like 1-AA. It’s the only way, so get ‘er done!
Frank Lane
December 4th, 2011
9:23 pm
If Alabama wins the national championship without winning either its conference or its division, maybe we will finally get a playoff.
Johnny Tucats
December 4th, 2011
9:23 pm
It’s messed up. Them Okie state boys will have to go undefeated next time. Why so many losers this year?
Les Miles
December 4th, 2011
9:23 pm
I own Nick Saban.
PB Jelly
December 4th, 2011
9:24 pm
Every game counts – what a joke!
LSU 9 Bama 6
At Home no less.
That should be the end of it. Rematches are for losers. Conference losers. Game losers. Bama losers. ESPN should be ashamed. Alabama fans are too far up Saban’s rear to be ashamed.
The BCS is a BEAUTY contest. Nothing else.
coloradobulldog
December 4th, 2011
9:24 pm
It’s an embarrassment as an SEC fan that Bama made it. Let the SEC winner play the winner of a conference like Pac 10 or Big 12 to continue to prove we rule. Does nothing to show an SEC team can beat an SEC team. And what in the world are they doing picking Va Tech for BCS Bowl. Please! Maybe this will be the death of the BCS.
Orange11
December 4th, 2011
9:24 pm
The BCS did exactly what it was suppossed to do matching #1 LSU and #2 Alabama. I have no problem with this. There is not going to be a playoff in the foreseeable future. Maybe you would like to go back to the old system where just conference tie-ins go to certain bowls. #1 and #2 would seldom meet. It’s still a little like that with West Virginia getting an invite to a BCS bowl and a team like Boise state ranked high and going to the MAACO bowl, not a Boise fan and would like to see them get B-Slapped but fair is fair.
Skitty Fritty
December 4th, 2011
9:24 pm
The other travesty is how did the ACC put two teams in the BCS?
Proposal
December 4th, 2011
9:24 pm
We have a Conference System as our primary framework for determining who plays who for MOST of the season. Non-Conference games are arranged 6 to 8 years in advance and are based on nothing more than inside relationships and TV ratings. There are +’s and -’s to it of course, but this is the underlying framework by which we determine who is ranked and, hence, who plays who in the post-season.
Beat everyone necessary to win YOUR Conference, and this should be the PRIMARY determinant for who plays in the NACG … PERIOD!!! Nick “2-faced” Saban said it himself.
PROPOSAL: every team in every conference plays their required number of in-conference games (typically 8 or 9 games). Play them all during the first 8 or 9 weeks of the season. Then, based upon the same ranking system we already have, start matching up the ranked teams to play each other for the last 3 or 4 weeks of regular season. Let this continue on into quarter-final, semi-final and final match-ups in the post-season in the form of bowl games that (again) we already have.
At the end what you have is 2 teams playing each other for a National Championship who have PROVEN their worth by WINNING ON THE FIELD!!!
If it still turns out that there are 2 SEC teams playing in the NACG, then so be it … but at least everyone would know those 2 teams got there by BEATING everyone else who has a legitimate shot ON THE FIELD (not in some abstract polling booth).
bamaguy
December 4th, 2011
9:25 pm
College Football 2011: 1. LSU, 2. Alabama, 3. Everybody else.
Outside the sec
December 4th, 2011
9:26 pm
We do have a choice, boycott the bcs/Espn. I for one will until a playoff is in place.
Troof
December 4th, 2011
9:26 pm
Butthurt Dawg fan writing this article as if Bama wouldn’t have run UGA just like LSU did this weekend. Please. UGA just needs to worry about a POed Sparty who got hosed.
SEC Fact Finder
December 4th, 2011
9:26 pm
The only game that counts now is the BCS title game. The AP pollsters removed themselves from the Big Picture. If the AP wants to call a different champion than the winner of the BCS title game then they have the right to do so. The winner is the winner in the BCS eyes.
Body of work, is more of the criterior than each loss or each win. I think we have all seen how poor a whole a BIG 12( is it Big 10 or Big
it is now. The schools of Oklahoma, Texas and OKSU( or soon to be name Boone Pickens University) all decided they wanted less competition across the board. The blame should be placed straight on the shoulders of those few men who wanted to control the conference without Nebraska, Colorado, Texas A&M and Missouri.
Skitty Fritty
December 4th, 2011
9:26 pm
bamaguy
You are right. You are #2 and smell like it to.
PB Jelly
December 4th, 2011
9:27 pm
Hey Daddo -
I don’t like Georgia either. BUT YOU LOST. On the field. Fair and Square. Every Game Counts – right? Except the ones the Tide doesn’t win. Then they don’t count anymore.
Give me a break. Put on your bikini for the Swimsuit competition. Sing a pretty song for the audience. The BCS is nothing but a glorified beauty contest. If it was about football, Bama would be in the Sugar Bowl – cause they already LOST.
Jake
December 4th, 2011
9:28 pm
Get over it men Myer left because he had to face Alabama and LSU to win the sec.They are by far the best teams this year.
Les Miles
December 4th, 2011
9:28 pm
I own Nick Saban
Alice
December 4th, 2011
9:30 pm
PS- Mark Bradley is a 2 bit hack writer for the local fishwrapper AJC and doesn’t have sense enough to poor piss out of a boot beofre putting it on. He hates Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee…..most SEC schools, seems to love GA TECH and GA in some sentimental ways, I guess because it’s the Dog and Jackets fans that buy his rag newspaper and subsequently, pay his bills…..he fancies himself a “blogger”…. he pulled the same crap last year when he hopped on the Boise State bandwagon…… “Boise State is gonna get screwed and what is the NCAA gonna do about it”??? “Now he’s on the Oklahome State got screwed” bandwagon….who will it be next year Mark??
Tired of College Football
December 4th, 2011
9:30 pm
Won’t be watching the game. Already saw it a couple of weeks ago. Why not let the winner of this game play the winner of the Super Bowl for the World Football Championship. They are semi pro anyway. Might tune out until there is a playoff system. BCS bowls is a joke. One or two fewer games during the season, then a playoff. Won’t happen though. No one wants to give up there home game with a FCS team and the money it generates.
James
December 4th, 2011
9:31 pm
bwahahaha
bamaguy
December 4th, 2011
9:31 pm
If Alabama smells like #2, what does “we own this state” but got out backsides handed to us by LSU smell like?
hamptondawg
December 4th, 2011
9:33 pm
Bullseye Mark. I will have every TV in my housed on and tuned to something other than the game as a one man ratings protest.
tmc
December 4th, 2011
9:33 pm
SEC Fact Finder-
Your argument is false. The “body of work” of which you speak favors OSU not Alabama. You might want to do a little research before you type.
(unless you want to show your ignorance? in that case, job well done!)
Broadway Joe Willie #12
December 4th, 2011
9:34 pm
No whiff! Bama should have won the first game, & will win this one, REALLY if you had to put up your house at risk, who would you take to beat LSU? Bama or OK. State??? thats what I thought, no brainer its ROLL TIDE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dutch
December 4th, 2011
9:35 pm
Oklahoma State lost to a 6-6 and unranked Iowa State. Alabama lost to #1 LSU…in overtime. Easy decision and the BCS got it right.
Bull
December 4th, 2011
9:36 pm
This is what happens when college presidents refuse to consider a playoff. The BCS is flawed and college football, like our nation is getting what it deserves.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:36 pm
If they were not going to give Ok State the shot, they should have given the trophy to LSU last night. They shouldn’t have to beat Bama twice to win the title. There’s no doubt in my mind that the team I saw last night in the second half can’t beat anybody including Bama a second time.
NeitherAProphetNorASon
December 4th, 2011
9:36 pm
Bama Grad
December 4th, 2011
8:42 pm
Had nothing to do with the brand. Bama is the more complete team. I don’t care how good their defense looked against a depleted OU offense last night – they gave up over 500 yards I believe in 3 different games this year including the loss to Iowa State. A team with that kind of defense doesn’t deserve a spot in the title game.
Well, now…let’s take that statement and flip it. The mighty Tide defense gave up over 300 yards to 1-AA GEORGIA SOUTHERN! Maybe a team with THAT kind of defense DOESN’T deserve a spot in the title game. Well, that kind of defense and THAT kind of kicker! Just sayin’…
CrimsonInSuwanee
December 4th, 2011
9:36 pm
Was it bad for Bama to have to play Florida again in 1999 in Atlanta after having beaten them in the Swamp during the regular season? No, because the rules say that the East champ plays the West champ irrespective of whether they played in the regular season.
The rules for the BCS say that #1 plays #2. Simple. Many different sources put Bama at #2.
You’re protesting against life itself. Please stop whining.
Offense is Easy
December 4th, 2011
9:37 pm
Bradley’s the Grinch.
Basically, once a team gets screwed, then all others which could be remotely considered in the same predicament must be screwed as well. Nice logic there, buddy. If Georgia got screwed, then you want Alabama to be, too? Or are you saying Georgia wasn’t screwed?
Pick one.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:37 pm
Someone needs to dismiss little Herbie. He is the worse thing out there for college football. He gets on his little stump at this time every year trying to pick who HE wants to see.
Artie
December 4th, 2011
9:37 pm
The BCS is crap!!!
Taking nos. 13 (Michigan) and 14 (VT) over 7 (Boise) and 8 (K-State)…f-ing ridiculous!!!
RedandBlackPeachy
December 4th, 2011
9:38 pm
Blah, blah, blah. I don’t have a dog in the fight but I will watch because I want to see good football. For all the years we have seen lopsided meeting in the NC I am looking forward to a grudge match. In the end I don’t really care that LSU met up with AL earlier. This is about good football, plain and simple; not any of these other ridiculous arguments.
Curtis
December 4th, 2011
9:38 pm
The two best teams are playing. Bama or LSU would rout OK State
PB Jelly
December 4th, 2011
9:38 pm
Just like the SEC title game, perhaps we can go ahead and declare that LSU is the national champion no matter what happens in the championship game.
Even if they lose, they are 1-1 against Holy Bama, have a dramatically better out of conference record, and clearly deserve it.
Wonder what the Bammers would think about their Beauty Contest then?
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:39 pm
I would put my house up on the one I saw play last night. They don’t have to worry about making Bama one dimensional. They already are.
EDIMGIAFAD
December 4th, 2011
9:39 pm
@bamaguy – talk all you want – Bama would get destroyed by OSU. The Bama secondary would get lit up like the Macy’s Christmas tree. Sure, Bama might score 40 but they would give up at least 50 (Georgia Southern scored 21 and they are a borderline GHSA team).
Bama has the Media in their pockets and some reason, Sabin can do/say whatever he wants. That’s why Bama is playing in the “National Championship”
All this year’s BCS says is that a playoff is needed more than ever
Mike
December 4th, 2011
9:39 pm
OK State shouldn’t have lost to Iowa State – then there’d be no reason to deny them a chance at the national title! They would have been crushed anyway if they were playing LSU with their defense ranked 113th in the nation…. The BCS got it right.
Bill
December 4th, 2011
9:40 pm
CRIE BABIES !!!!!!
Mark Bradley
December 4th, 2011
9:40 pm
Herbstreit is perfect for TV: He says a lot of stuff with great emotion. Who cares if he makes no sense?
Defense is easy when there is no Offense on the other side
December 4th, 2011
9:40 pm
Bama has a great Defense, but Mark is right… their schedule was very easy – not as easy as UGA’s was this year, but it was very easy.
They did not play any high powered offense except LSU and Arkansas and they were 1-1 there….
Here is the offensive rank of each one of Bama’s opponents….
114
110
77
15
72
61
116
106
12
73
82
Anybody could have a great D going against those anemic offenses…
Yes Bama should have beat LSU, but Oregon should have as well if folks would have watched that game.
Ok State plays against much higher powered offenses than those in the SEC and that is why their defensive numbers are not the same, but their offense is lights out!
Greedy BCS system is Bad for College football. I turned off the first Bama / LSU bore fest and won’t watch this one at all.
Artie
December 4th, 2011
9:40 pm
You would think Saban wouldn’t be such a tight-wad that he would spend one of his schollies on a bona fide placekicker. LMAO
That long-kicker/short-kicker ain’t gonna cut it!!!
bamaguy
December 4th, 2011
9:40 pm
This is fun, but I need to find a hotel reservation for New Orleans. I have already gotten an email from the Alabama Athletic Office asking if I wanted to buy tickets. I guess they were ready and made advance arrangements.
Chaddy Scottt: unemployed
December 4th, 2011
9:40 pm
Bradley is such a tool.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:41 pm
What are Bamers going to whine about when they get beaten a second time. Getting beat twice will be more embarrassing that losing 42-10.
Cry baby cry
December 4th, 2011
9:41 pm
Hey PB Jelly,
I assume you are a delusional UGA fan. Face it, UGA played 3 real teams this year and lost all three. Maybe they should be in the national championship game because they improved so much this year from last,
Monroe's First Redcoat
December 4th, 2011
9:41 pm
Well said, Mark! LSU/Bama for the MNC is a joke. Okie State was absolutely robbed, but their band isn’t as popular, and they are, after all, from Oklahoma and not Tuscaloosa. What a friggin’ joke.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
9:41 pm
go dawgs? we seen they cant or want ever be able to play with lsu or bama.
107th Total Defense = Awesome!
December 4th, 2011
9:41 pm
One team lost to the best team in the country….one team lost to Iowa State…..
One team lost to the best team in the country….one team lost to Iowa State…..
One team lost to the best team in the country….one team lost to Iowa State…..
One team lost to the best team in the country….one team lost to Iowa State…..
hmmmmmm….this is so hard. lemme think some more….hmmmmm
Curtis
December 4th, 2011
9:41 pm
RRRROOOOLLLLLLLL TIDE
Lily
December 4th, 2011
9:42 pm
This game is officially a JOKE.
wreckbone
December 4th, 2011
9:42 pm
Just keep letting this typoe of thing exclude PAC 10 and Big 12 teams and we will have a playoff sooner rahter than later, as it should be
BamaGoose
December 4th, 2011
9:42 pm
Boohooo
Shine
December 4th, 2011
9:43 pm
I am a solid SEC fan but what a sham and a shame. Using this silly logic, Ga a few years back should have played for the national title. It was right Ga didnt and its wrong Bama gets to. I dont even care to watch them play again and was looking forward to LSU vrs OSU.
They may as well just drop the BCS crap and go back to the way it was. This is as sickening as Washington and Wall Street politics.
Artie
December 4th, 2011
9:43 pm
Man, Saban makes it so easy to root against the Tide. Go Mad Hatter!!!
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:44 pm
If you notice Herbstreit stumps for the same teams every year if they are anywhere near the top. Alabama, LSU, UF, Ohio State, USC, Oregon, and maybe Boise and that’s it.
PB Jelly
December 4th, 2011
9:44 pm
Hey Bamaguy –
It’s “we run this state”. If you want to slander Georgia at least get it straight.
And this has nothing to do with Georgia. Nothing. This has to do with the hypocrisy of the BCS. We know how Bama fared against LSU. All these blowhards claim to know how Oklahoma State would fare against LSU. Problem is they haven’t (and won’t) met on the field. Every game is important.
Except the one’s Saban loses. Those don’t count.
It’s just a beauty contest. Enjoy the Mrs. BCS Pageant in New Orleans.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
9:44 pm
just why did the coaches rank bama ahead of them if yall all know so much?
PB Jelly
December 4th, 2011
9:45 pm
One team lost to LSU.
One team never got to play them.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:45 pm
I think this cinches that we will get a playoff. Even ESPN was starting to stump for it on Saturday. They want a game that more than 1/3 of the country will care about.
Dr. Dave
December 4th, 2011
9:45 pm
Bama already had their shot against LSU and lost. They had two weeks to prepare for a game at home and lost. They do not deserve another chance against LSU, nor does Oregon, Arkansas or any of the other ranked teams that have succumbed to LSU. OSU deserved their opportunity to slay the dragon, but alas, ESPN controlled its own destiny on this one. It was more than coincidence that Nicky was on the set for the SEC championship game, a game that his team did not qualify for.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
9:46 pm
sorry but losing to a 6-6 team dont get you that credit.
OldSchoolGT21
December 4th, 2011
9:46 pm
The reason why Alabama didn’t have to win their conference or division is b/c they played LSU closer than any team in the land and lost what should have been an easy win with several missed kicks. UGA gave LSU no competition which made the rest of the SEC look like a moot point. To that regard, the game was over in first few minutes of the second half when Georgia gave up 42 unanswered points. OSU doesn’t pass the sniff test b/c their defense sucks and their special teams are nothing compared to LSU and Alabama. Alabama also has the best college player in the country who perhaps could be the very best college football player to ever play the game. If you study the manchild that No. 3 is for Alabama, you would quickly learn there has never been another RB like him in the history of the game. I can’t even name a single player on the OSU team. The LSU / Alabama game was hailed as the game of the year by a landslide. You should be happy that your Bulldogs had such a nice year although their defense was never a true No. 4 in the nation. The best offense you played all year was Boise who beat you and Vanderbuilt who you barely beat…(Vanderbuilt?) Come on man…..
Dick
December 4th, 2011
9:47 pm
Look who this D-bag writes for. What can you expect? All you leg humpers can go crawl in your holes and chant the new UGA motto “If we only had to play 30 minutes”.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
9:47 pm
anybody who dont think lsu and bama are the best 2 teams in the country has no business watching football anyway
SEC
December 4th, 2011
9:47 pm
All of these Nick Saban haters are just jealous. As a UGA fan, I am thrilled that two SEC teams are playing for the National Championship. Confirms what we’ve been saying for years – that the SEC is the elite conference in college football. I only wish UGA was lucky enough to have Nick Saban as our coach.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:48 pm
UGA gave them no competition? I bet BAma doesn’t hold them to no first downs in the first half. They didnt do it the first time. At least we scored 10 points against them.
OldSchoolGT21
December 4th, 2011
9:48 pm
Herbstreit is the guy that wears the jock you wish you wore each week.
Dale
December 4th, 2011
9:48 pm
same way Florida won their 96 title. Rematch BS.
Then Urban cried and got his free title (against the Big 10) lobbying against the rematch scenario.
01HAWK
December 4th, 2011
9:49 pm
Must be hard for REECE DAVIS (Alabama Grad) to report on ESPN and keep a straight face. He is from MUSCLE SHOALS ALABAMA.
REECE…………………………………I know after you leave work you will celebrate.
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
9:49 pm
FOLLOW THE MONEY TO THE CORRUPTION,,,,,,,,,,,,ESPN; BCS; NCAA; SENATE AND THE BCS LOBBIESTS. NUFF SAID
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
9:50 pm
Herbstreit is the most pompous a-hole in the CFB analyst landscape…no one irritates me more than him on TV. He predicted that UGA would keep the first half close vs LSU because they “wanted to prove everyone wrong.” That is such BS…it had more to do with wanting to win the SEC than trying to prove your petty a$$ wrong Herbie…can’t stand that guy.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:50 pm
One things for sure. You will NEVER see Tech lift that crystal football as the undisputed champs
GRS
December 4th, 2011
9:50 pm
Keep Hating…Roll Tide Roll!
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
9:51 pm
Mark, excellent commentary btw, kudos.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:51 pm
Yea Herbstreit is the biggest jerk know it all on TV.
Bob
December 4th, 2011
9:51 pm
You do wonder why they need to play this game. Either way, LSU is the NC. Even if they lose, they will have the exact same record as Bama, and since LSU beat Bama on the road, they win the tie breaker. The Hat does it again!
jimmie
December 4th, 2011
9:51 pm
You’re an idiot Bradley. No other team could hold the Tide’s jockstrap. Okie state plays a puss- schedule and has puss- fans.
01HAWK
December 4th, 2011
9:51 pm
STATE of ALABAMA……………………………………..We run the BCS……………………..3 YEARS ina row a team from the state will play in the game.
UGA………………………………………..Where are you ? ……………………31 years and counting.
chris
December 4th, 2011
9:51 pm
Of course the BCS is a joke. The last thing the NCAA wants is a playoff system and one that would would involve non-BCS teams is that system. It’s sexy to have a LSU, Bama, Ohio State or Notre Dame national champ. They don’t want a Utah, Boise St., Houston to get on a roll on the way to being national champs. Utah won with Urban Meyer and when Boise St. had their shot against oklahoma they beat them in a classic thriller of a game. BCS isn’t fair and not supposed to be but a system that favors big schools and then only certain ones of those.
Drake
December 4th, 2011
9:52 pm
So your saying Alabama isn’t the 2nd best team in the country? Who is?? Alabama lost to #1 LSU in overtime by 3, Ok State lost to unranked Iowa state in OT, who trumps who? BCS game is exactly who it should be, the 1st and second best teams in the country.
crying dawg
December 4th, 2011
9:52 pm
GET REAL MARK AND DAWG FANS
Dawg Whisperer
December 4th, 2011
9:53 pm
Mark, you’re dead on. The unbiased computers chose Okie State and tradition (biased people) chose Bammer. What happens if Bammer beats LSU 9-6 or something similar? Nothing will be decided. Okie State should be in this game. Bammer had their chance at home and lost. Just don’t expect people who wear toilet paper and a Tide box on their head to comprehend your logic.
SEC IS COLLEGE FOOTBALL
December 4th, 2011
9:53 pm
This only validates what all SEC fans say all year. SEC IS THE BEST BRAND and only about two other conferences matter. Big 10 is a distant second place with The Big 12 or whatever it is now tied with Big 10. When Texas and Oklahoma are really good it makes that league seem to be very solid but lately, not so sure. They are way down as a league and are trying to survive.
OKY State? They have a nice O but would be stomped by BOTH LSU and ALABAMA.
Get over it GT fans. Get over it Big 12 fans.
SEC owns college football.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:53 pm
Yea, that’s a great accomplishment. Alabama teams play in the biggest farce of a championship game in the history of college football.
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
9:53 pm
Bob, yeah…if LSU loses a close game to Alabama, say another 9-6 type game in OT…who is to say UA is the NC? lol
K9 NONSENSE
December 4th, 2011
9:54 pm
WELL,WELL,WELL…………..WHAT HAVE WE HERE? A PATHETIC ARTICLE MARK FOR SURE!!! TO NAME CALL A COACH & TO PLAY IT UP TO THE STATE SCHOOL TO SELL PAPERS IS PI$$ POOR AT BEST,& YOU SIR ARE A SHAMEFUL”HUCKLEBERRY”!!! WHO ARE YOU OR ANYONE TO SAY WHOM SHOULD OR SHOULDN’T PLAY IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP GAME!! DID YOU HAVE A VOTE??! YOU CERTAINLY HAVE & AGENDA THAT IS LACKING IN FACTS & TRUTH!!! WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS,HOWEVER,THE SYSTEM AT HAND HAS A FORMULA THAT WAS USED & (LIKE IT OR NOT) PUT THE BEST TWO TEAM IN,PERIOD!!!
Pulaski Dawg
December 4th, 2011
9:54 pm
I think I see the light. When Georgia was #2–Lsu wins conference–Espn talking heads profess UGA can’t play for title–didn’t win conference–Now it’s Ala–good to go. Ok St. gets screwed.
Fulton Kuykendall
December 4th, 2011
9:54 pm
T. Boone Pickens probably spit Metamucil all over his TV……..he’s gonna put a hit out on somebody!
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
9:55 pm
A #5 team was playing a #1 team for a championship last night.
I am talking about UGA playing LSU for SEC championship. I didn’t hear a single dawg fan complaining about the SEC system picking a #5 vs #1. Why?
FLA DAWG
December 4th, 2011
9:55 pm
Mark, Mark, Mark,
I am the first to want a playoff but the bottomline for this season is LSU and Bama are the two best teams in the country and you know it.
LSU is a great team. Bama GAVE them a win with 4 (or was it 5) missed field goals!
Come on man – your hatred of Bama is showing a bit here isn’t it?
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:56 pm
Drake, I don’t care who anyone thinks is the second best team. That’s opinion. If you lost to the #1 team during the year you shouldn’t get a do over. They should have dropped back to #5 after that game. That’s the first time I have seen a #2 team lose to the top team and only drop 2 places. That was a joke.
OldSchoolGT21
December 4th, 2011
9:57 pm
@kerryB – You should re-read your post and pour out the sour beer you’re still pissing in. You guys got lucky in the first half, were overmatched and out of shape to handle the best team in the nation during the second half. Who cares about no first downs in the first half? The game is 60 minutes long and UGA stopped playing in the second half. I don’t think UGA made a first down in the second half.
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
9:58 pm
Pulaski Dawg,
when was UGA #2? You were BCS #4 in 2007 before the SEC Champ game, then dropped to #5 afterwards. You were never even close to #2.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
9:59 pm
I guess I should have said they only dropped one place after they lost to LSU. No other team would have done that. They got the Saban ranking and that’s it.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
9:59 pm
ga will never get a chance to play for a crystal football because their coach cant beat a team ranked in the top 25. he is like 3-16 last 19 tries. please keep him
Ted
December 4th, 2011
10:00 pm
Or if you flip ok state with oklahoma, they would have given oklahoma the chance. total bs.
Fan of the Game
December 4th, 2011
10:00 pm
If Bama wins why shouldn’t LSU get another shot. Make it best two out of three. The first tie breaker in any league is usually head to head. LSU beat them in the regular season and shouldn’t have to beat them again. The BCS is a bunch of crap. Like letting Va. Tech who got embarrased last night go to the Sugar Bowl.
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
10:00 pm
THEY’VE ADDED ‘BODYOF WORK’ TO THE FORMULA AND REPLACED ‘MARGIN OF VICTORY’ WITH ‘STYLE POINTS’…………THE BCS DIDN’T DO THIS……….ESPN DID, TOMANIPULATE VOTERS.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:00 pm
OldSchoolGT21, would you say we were over matched like Tech was against UGA?
Rick
December 4th, 2011
10:01 pm
Come on Mark so you are saying that a team that was ranked #2 that lost to a very bad Iowa St team deserves to stay ranked #2. When you lose to a team that bad you should drop well outside the top ten. UGA lost to two top top 12 teams and then won ten in a row and could get no closer than 14th so why should OK S.T even be close enough to the top of the rankings to even be considered.
K9 NONSENSE
December 4th, 2011
10:01 pm
NEWS FLASH………….THIS JUST IN ……………..LSU SCORES AGAIN & (TO QUOTE L.MONSOON)…………..IT’S RAINING TEARS FROM THE SKY!!!! BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! OH & LEGHUMPERS……………………HOW’S THAT HOBNAIL BOOT FEELING ABOUT NOW??!!! 2ND TIER TEAM……..2ND TIER BOWL GAME!!!! HARDY,HAR,HAR,HAR,HAR!!!!!
kl
December 4th, 2011
10:01 pm
downfall of bcs has started; sec just wants the money
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
10:01 pm
FLA DAWG,
Mark just wants to stir up some pot so that some dawg fans can pile up blog entries. Mark’s end-of-year bonus is tied to the number of blog entries posted under his name.
Many dawg fans fall for it like fish biting a bait.
RLT
December 4th, 2011
10:02 pm
Stop crying about the SEC, Saban, and Alabama. Everyone except for the SEC and ACC got what they WISHED FOR. Rewind the clock to 4/30/2008 and the article, “BCS officials reject playoff proposal”.
During five hours of meetings, Southeastern Conference commissioner Mike Slive (to be read as SEC for the slow readers) presented a plan for a plus-one format, matching the No. 1 team in the nation against No. 4, and No. 2 vs. No. 3 in the marquee bowl games. The winners would meet about a week later in the BCS title game. The plan also called for creating a sixth BCS game.
In the end, only the SEC and ACC wanted to even continue the discussion of the plus-one.
There was no vote taken, the commissioners said, but the leaders of the Big East, Big 12, Pac-10 and Big Ten made it clear they didn’t want to move the BCS toward a playoff in any way.
I would guess that the BIG-12 Commissioner now regrets the decision not to go to a plus-one system. The SEC and ACC are ready!!
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
10:02 pm
So we have a game that no one wants to see. If LSU wins, it really proves nothing they haven’t proven already. If Alabama wins then we really don’t know which team should be champion. Is this really the best that college football can do when trying to crown a mythical champion?
Georgia Dawg
December 4th, 2011
10:03 pm
BAMAGUY–Go to Alabama, or go to he–! Not much difference as far as I am concerned!!!!
No Shock
December 4th, 2011
10:03 pm
Bradley- you’re an idiot. Alabama lost ONE game and that that was by 3 points to the undisputed #1 team. It takes a dolt like you to see this as a travesty.
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
10:03 pm
I love the college game.
But the lack of a TRUE playoff system is disgusting.
With each year of polling determining competition, I am losing interest.
For anyone to claim this system works…you are butt sniffing kool-aide drinkers.
IveGotTheAnswer
December 4th, 2011
10:03 pm
OkSt shouldnt have lost to Iowa St. The National Title was theirs to lose and they lost it. Also, no one seems to have a problem crowning Wisconsin Big10 champs. Shouldnt they play MichSt 1 more time to decide who the real champ is????? I agree there should be a playoff, but i have no problem with this game. They are the 2 best teams. Period.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:04 pm
I think the only reason Ok State lost to Iowa State was because they were distracted after the plane crash the day before and all that was going around them. I think that offense would give LSU defense more trouble than Alabama’s one dimensional offense will. I predict LSU will beat them 21-10 this time.
MSN
December 4th, 2011
10:04 pm
I remember when an undefeated Alabama team (prior to BCS) lost out in the polls to Notre Dame and Michigan State when Notre Dame played to tie MSU. There have been many cases of injustice, whether pre-BCS or current. As a Bama fan, I’m pleased to be able to have a rematch but recognize the problems. We’ve been on both sides of the issue. Please don’t insult us by acting as if Bama always gets its way. I agree that Auburn got burned when not able to play for all the marbles at least once. Until we get a play-off this will happen. But don’t get insulting. All the arguments are just that-arguments.
Fan of the Game
December 4th, 2011
10:05 pm
If Bama beats LSU will the Tigers get another chance. Make it a best two out of three. Most tie breakers are head to head competition. LSU beat Bama and shouldn’t have to do it again. This has proved that the BCS isn’t the answer. How about VA. Tech going to the Sugar Bowl after getting embarrassed last night?
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
10:05 pm
No Shock,
Bradley just wants to see how many fish he can catch with a nonsense, and he caught tons already.
Crusty Old Dawg
December 4th, 2011
10:05 pm
Great piece Mark, Oaklahoma State should be outraged as should all of college football. I do not want to see a rematch. I don’t know if we will ever see fairness. Too much money and political power involved with college football, high profile schools, bowl games, and ESPN influence. It’s not just with the championship game, lesser bowls pick there teams based on how many fans will travel. I want to see a playoff as do most college fans.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:06 pm
IveGotTheAnswer, you could also say that the NC was Alabama’s to lose on Nov 5th and they lost. They should have beaten LSU. At least Ok State beat Oklahoma convincingly to win their conference.
Fan of the Game
December 4th, 2011
10:06 pm
Hey Bradley why won’t you take my comments? I have tried twice.
K9 NONSENSE
December 4th, 2011
10:06 pm
I’M NOT GONNA WATCH(BOO HOO HOO)!!! MY TEAM CAN’T CUT IT SO I AIN’T WATCHIN’(SNIFF,SNIFF WITH A BIG ‘OL SNOT BUBBLE)!!!! NOT MENTION THEY’RE GONNA SIGN CMR FOR 5 MORE YEARS(WAH,WAH,WAH)!!! I WANT MY MOMMIE!!!!!!
Brad
December 4th, 2011
10:07 pm
So if a nfl team loses to a team in the reg season and plays them again in the sb and wins, they aren’t nfl champions? Nice logic.
Bama Bill
December 4th, 2011
10:08 pm
Fun to be a Bama Fan ! Maybe Houston or Boise will be a worthy opponent for Oklahoma State – all they needed to do is run the bale which they did not – even considering the weak competition !
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:08 pm
GTBob, for once I agree with you.
Bob
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
“Also, no one seems to have a problem crowning Wisconsin Big10 champs. Shouldnt they play MichSt 1 more time to decide who the real champ is?????” -IveGotTheAnswer
Ah, good question. In the Big 10, you have to win your division to play in the championship game.
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
Any playoff system which utilizes the current polls to determine rank is doom to the same failure as what we have now.
The only true playoff system is to match up conference champions. Lower tier conferences could be selected for a couple of at-large berths. But the major conferences can name a champion and those champions can be seeded by a selection committee.
Competition should determine champions……not morons with agendas.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
I think what they have just done renders a BCS title game irrelevant.
OldSnarky
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
This season, I will NOT watch the BCS Championship game. It is nothing but a joke. BCS rules should say that a school can NOT play a school for the second time in a season. What if bama beats LSU By a field goal…what then. The championship game should be between LSU and Oklahoma State. PERIOD! In my mind, if LSU wins, they are national champs. If BAMA wins, then Oklahoma state Must be declared National Champions IF they win their bowl game. GET RID OF THE STUPID BCS AND GO BACK TO THE WAY IT WAS. Let the fans vote as well to determine the national champ.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
Like Mark Bradley knows anything about real college football or the NFL or the NBA or MLB.
14th National Championship on the way. Not to mention we OWN the state of Georgia in recruiting as well.
Hate on haters…. ROLL TIDE!!!!!!!!!
Pat
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
Lsu will be even better next year.
Friday Nights
December 4th, 2011
10:09 pm
BCS Bowls are here to stay unless the Fed’s step in and delcare it illegal. Too many Millions on the line, 5m to 20m going to the schools and confrences for each game depending on the bowl, and thats not to think of what the host cities brings in. Not going to change any time soon, but then again obama was elected.
Gilderoy lockhart
December 4th, 2011
10:10 pm
All okie st had to do to play in the title game was beat a lousy isu team. All Boise had to do was kick a field goal.these other one loss teams have only themselves to blame.
Buckshot57
December 4th, 2011
10:10 pm
You can bet the farm, that if UGA was in the spot Alabama is in, the comments on this blog would be a lot different.
swhite1951
December 4th, 2011
10:11 pm
Hey Realist, gotta update you on current events: http://www.uefa.com/uefa/aboutuefa/organisation/president/news/newsid=1726353.html
The Bear
December 4th, 2011
10:11 pm
Alabama didn’t make this system. Ask Nick Saban or any other FBS head coach and I bet they tell you they want a playoff system. All the Dawg folks on here are just pissed after getting violated by LSU and now they are here crowing about a Saban conspiracy. I think Oklahoma State has a valid argument, all you folks complaining write the NCAA don’t blame Bama. Better yet demand more out of whatever college you follow.
ROLL TIDE
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:11 pm
rad
December 4th, 2011
10:07 pm
So if a nfl team loses to a team in the reg season and plays them again in the sb and wins, they aren’t nfl champions? Nice logic.
____________________________________________________________________________
The difference is that the NFL has playoffs. The season is a playoff in college.
Fan of the Game
December 4th, 2011
10:12 pm
Go back to an 11 game schedule. Finish it in mid November and then have an 8 team playoff. Final two teams play in the NC game the day after New Years. The Rose, Sugar, Cotton or Orange would host on a rotating basis. The other six teams go to one of the other big Bowl games that is not hosting the NC game. Other Bowls get to have their games and everybody is happy. Only negative is taking a game off the 12 game schedule. Conferences having a championship game may have to start the season the last Sat. in August.
IveGotTheAnswer
December 4th, 2011
10:12 pm
The BCS has proven that if you lose late in the season it is almost impossible to recover. OkSt lost after Bama lost so they blew their chance. It also didnt help that it was Iowa St. If they’d have lost to Oklahoma that day instead, then they might be playing LSU
12/4/2011 Evening Edition | collegefootballnewswire.com
December 4th, 2011
10:13 pm
[...] FELDMAN: Program Changer Griffin III My Heisman Pick KING: All-SEC Quarterback In Doubt BRADLEY: Yet Another BCS Whiff – ‘Bama Brand Burns Cowboys HLAS: Oklahoma? Insight? What More Could Iowa Have Wanted? WOJCIECHOWSKI: A Season To Remember [...]
Matt
December 4th, 2011
10:13 pm
Every Game Counts, even the Iowa State game.
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
10:13 pm
All Alabama had to do to make the MNC game was beat Arkansas and not lose to LSU too bad. Not exactly hard to do but good for them for doing it.
swhite1951
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
Oh, and Realist, you might want to check out this site as well: http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/index.html
I realize, by the way, the Europe is a part of the world. And it doesn’t really matter whether European soccer has a playoff or not, the BCS should give way to a playoff.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
kerry b they lost what 4 people in a plane crash? go to ALABAMA and just take a look at what we lost.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
Haa haa haa like anyone gives a dizzzam if you leg humpers watch? No one watched the SEC Championship game either… zzzzz fest.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
The Bear, No, Dawgs fans are pissed about things being formed to benefit you and not anyone else. Dawgs fans will NEVER get over being slighted in 2007. They kept the Dawgs out of the champioship game using the reasoning that they are not using against you this time. That’s why we are pissed. we knew it was a tall order to win that game yesteday
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
This the official chardonnay blog.
dirty dawg
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
Just glad the sorry Dawgs are not in the championship game. I hope they never get lucky enough to make it to the big dance. The entire program, fans and players are repugnant!! If they had played the schedule that any of the teams in the West played, they would not be going bowling this year.
BBQ MAN
December 4th, 2011
10:15 pm
answer is obviously playoffs but qw are stuck with choosing the best 2 to play and any OBJECTIVE football fan can see that Bama is clearly one of the best two teams. just look, actually look at them play
Mets
December 4th, 2011
10:15 pm
Answer this– If okla st had beaten iowa and was undefeated going into yesterdays game against ok and they lost a close one, they would NOT get in the game so why does losing to a worse opponent allow for them to get in a few weeks ago???
christophorm
December 4th, 2011
10:16 pm
IF this is a 11-0 florida and a 10-1 Georgia and Georgia did’nt make the championship game then, noway this happens…I remember Auburn had 3 nfl players, went undefeated and did’nt get in a few years back.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:16 pm
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:14 pm
kerry b they lost what 4 people in a plane crash? go to ALABAMA and just take a look at what we lost.
_______________________________________________________________________
Completely idiotic comment. That’s like saying you just lost a bunch of people in trailers.
swhite1951
December 4th, 2011
10:16 pm
Hey, Buckshot, I’ll take that bet. I can guarantee you that if it Stanford was undefeated, Oregon was ranked second, and Alabama was third and the BCS gave the rematch to Stanford/Oregon your comments would be entirely different from what they are now.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:17 pm
kerryb,
In 2007, UGA lost two games. You lost to a .500 S. Carolina team and got a rump stomping at the feet of Tennessee. This is not the same situation. You guys need to stop with the revisionist history.
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
10:17 pm
GTBob,
OSU had its chance but lost it by losing to a 6-6 team.
BAMA had its chance but lost it by losting a #1 team.
But now you are saying OSU got it back? how?
Fan of the Game
December 4th, 2011
10:17 pm
Dirty Dawg – I see where you got your name from.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:19 pm
At what point in 2007 was UGA ranked #2 in any pole? Again, stop it with the revisionist history.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:19 pm
51ML, LSU lost 2 games and lost to Arkansas at home the last game of the year. Just like now everyone was saying USC and UGA were the best 2 teams at the end of the year but they didn’t get to face each other in the title game. Now they are saying,” lets get the best 2 teams in the game”. They’ve made a so-called NC a big joke.
Shine
December 4th, 2011
10:20 pm
Michigan and Ohio State got screwed in 2006 then. Nobody besides Alabama and maybe LSU wants to see thse two play again. What a black eye and dark day for college football. May as well go back to the way it was or play 10 regular season games and have a playoff. Disgraceful, sickening, pathetic….even rigged comes to mind.
Fan of the Game
December 4th, 2011
10:20 pm
Somebody tell me why Va. Tech goes to the Sugar Bowl and Boise State doesn’t?
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
10:20 pm
Tide fans are delusional.
I know because I live in Alabama.
If we had a playoff system, the Tide could play in a bowl, but would be ineligible for the playoff.
LSU is the only team from the SEC who actually EARNED that right.
Alabama was voted in my judges.
It is a beauty contest.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
kerry you idiot. lsu lost twicein 07 like you but there losses were no where near as bad as YOUR losses. you got blown out in one game. lsu lost in triple ot twice and beat tenn who blew you out. It’s not even close to the same comparison. Alabama is the second best team. They didn’t get beat by a 6 or 7 loss team. Quit whining. If it was uga you would be calling people whiners and saying you belong.
Lil dawg
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
Two best teams are playing..so cry no more!
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
Alphare, OSU should have made it because of the one thing that we know for sure. That Alabama is not as good as LSU. It was proven. They lost to them at home. We have no idea if Ok St is better then LSU or if they are better then Alabama. Thanks to ESPN, we will never know.
The Bear
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
I think everyone here agrees there needs to be a playoff. But trying to make this into an Alabama conspiracy is silly.
Joseph Pulitzer
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
The BCS will not get my prize.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
kerryb,
Do you think UGA should have played LSU back in 2007?
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:21 pm
them sorry puppies dont want none of them people in them trailers. if they would have been throwing beer cans instead of footballs i bet ga players would have caught all of them
icedawg
December 4th, 2011
10:22 pm
Not interested in the repeat.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:22 pm
51ML, Matter of fact LSU lost to both Arkansas and Kentucky that year but still got to play for the title.
Realist
December 4th, 2011
10:22 pm
Hey swhite1951, those aren’t TEAMS, those are COUNTRIES… like the Olympics. I can assure you the English Premier League, La Liga, etc, don’t have playoffs. Bonus points on your google ability though… and you should watch Euro 2012. It will be great fun…
UGA fan
December 4th, 2011
10:23 pm
The BCS is wrong. LSU beat Bama already. Bama didn’t win there division or conference. It’s all about money and tv. If Bama want to be in the championship game, they should have beat LSU. I’m a Dawg fan, but Go LSU. I totally dislike Bama !!!!!!!!!
Tom
December 4th, 2011
10:25 pm
ESPN blows
Cloudodust
December 4th, 2011
10:26 pm
Personally I like the rematch of LSU-Alabama. Call it Alabama backdoor if you want and in reality, you’re logically right but the system this year says you’re wrong. SEC. Dominance…
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
10:27 pm
GTBob,
I am a Tech fan. Tech didn’t get to play LSU, how do I know Tech cannot beat LSU? should I blame BCS and ESPN too?
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:27 pm
ga fans should love repeats. every year yalls is a repeat.lose 4 or 5 games to ranked teams. wait for outback bowl.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:27 pm
51ML, In 2007 all of the top teams has 2 losses but all the media types like now was saying UGA and USC were playing better than anyone at the end of the year. Saturday night before the selections Herbsteit, May, and Holtz began stumping their,”UGA didn’t win it’s division or conference so they can’t play in that game, no one that does not win their conference should play in the game” line. The next day the BCS jumped LSU from 5th to 2 over us. That’s why Dawg fans are completely pissed about all this.
Shine
December 4th, 2011
10:28 pm
And hear the fans as the Alabama Mulligans take the field for a do over….gag
haha
December 4th, 2011
10:29 pm
Sure Okie State that lost to Iowa State should go to the Championship game. Really, think Bama would of lost to them. Okie State would score 36 against Bama or LSU, would of taken them 10 games to do it Marky Poo
Dan
December 4th, 2011
10:29 pm
Kentucky was also ranked 17th when lsu played them and lsu didn’t get blown out like you did idiot
Dunwoody DAWG
December 4th, 2011
10:29 pm
Come on Mark – none of us like the BCS but there’s little doubt who the two best team in the country are and Okie State’s not one of them. Losing to a punk team killed their chances..
LSUTigerinATL
December 4th, 2011
10:29 pm
Either LSU or Bama would crush OSU like we crushed everyone else this season! Stupid article by a dawg loving moron.
BCS Hater
December 4th, 2011
10:30 pm
Seriously…If Alabama had one loss to a 6-6 Vanderbilt, they would not have been considered for the BCS title game….So why should OK State be considered when they lost to a 6-6 ISU team?
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:30 pm
Instead of whining about BAMA and Saban, you guys should be upset with Okie St, Oregon, Stanford, and Boise St for losing. It’s not BAMA’s fault we dominated everyone on our schedule (except LSU) while the other contenders suffered really bad losses.
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
10:30 pm
Alphare, if Tech only had one loss, had more wins against winning teams then Bama, and has beaten more top 10 teams then Bama, then you would have a very good argument.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:31 pm
The bottom line is that if you were #4 in the BCS the last week of the season and #’s 1 and 2 lose then you should move up to #2 and play in the game. That’s it. And if they are going to say in 2007 you dont win your division you cant play in the game then it should mean that now.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:32 pm
ga fans should love repeats. every year is a repeat for yall. lose 4 or 5 games to ranked teams and then wait for outback bowl
CJ
December 4th, 2011
10:32 pm
Who even cares? Roll Tide Roll………14 Natl Champs……..We just beat the hell out out of you!
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:33 pm
Wasn’t 2007 four years ago?
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:34 pm
51ML, does not matter. If that was the standard four years ago it should be now.
the inconvenient truth
December 4th, 2011
10:34 pm
wow- Bradley proves once again that he knows less about college football than………well, just about anyone on the planet. Hey Mark (aka- tool) how about THIS fact……………anyone with a pair of eyes and the brains of a 10 year old KNOWS that the two BEST teams in the land are LSU and Bama. FACT you foolish moron. The BCS was designed to do ONE thing; bring #1 to play #2. It has. Ok State? ARE YOU KIDDING ME?????????? They would get boat raced by either LSU or Bama…………they play in an inferior conference. DEAL WITH IT PINHEAD. Of course, you follow UGA and that clown Mark “thugs r u” Richt that you wouldnt know a great team when you saw it. Shut your stupid inbred pie hole and accept reality; the two best teams in America ARE LSU and Bama…………and they will play in the game DESIGNED TO MATCH 31 AGAINST #2. DONT LIKE IT? COME UP WITH SOMETHING BETTER. Til then, Bama nation doesnt give a rat’s ass if any of you dawg poop fans watch the game or not. You clowns got humiliated by LSU. You would get a foot up your sorry ass had you played Bama. YOU played a cupcake schedule this year, and even more embarrassing next year. See if you can focus on winning BIG games against GREAT temas. When has Richt last done that??????????????????? (The man is a glorified recruiter– he is NOT an elite head coach) Bradley, you are a lousy and pathetic judge of college football talent. AND a long time Bama hater. Its gotta hurt, dont it? UGA won its NC WHEN? Bet they didnt play Bama that year either. Bama penis envy is a terrible thing buddy.
DawginTX
December 4th, 2011
10:35 pm
Mark, you make excellent points. Here’s the breakdown of Bama’s strongoints vs Ok State’s:
Overall record: Tie
Better Loss: Bama
Better Good Wins (vs BCS top 20): OSU 3 to 1
Better Decent wins (vs FBS teams with winning records): 7 to 3
Conference Champions: OSU, champion of the conference with the 2nd highest power ranking
Your piece last week about opinion mattering most in college football said it all. The ESPN propaganda machine dropped Georgia from 2 to 5 in 2007, kept Michigan out in 2006, robbed Peyton Manning of the Heisman in 1997, and now has kept OSU 0.013 points behind Bama in the BCS.
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
10:35 pm
I don’t get it with fans who argue against a playoff.
Of course, Alabama fans really want the current system THIS YEAR because their team gets in.
If we have a playoff, no way Alabama gets in if the 2 at large selections were conference champions of lower tier conferences.
Alabama lost in fair competition to LSU and should not be playing for the mythical NC.
If the berths for a championship were decided on the field of play rather than in cyberspace…the Tide would be out of it.
Alphare
December 4th, 2011
10:35 pm
GTBob,
SEC doesn’t have many good ranked teams than BIG12 is because LSU and BAMA are too strong, whoever played them have big losses. One or two more slips they become unranked.
So BIG12 ranked teams and SEC ranked teams are 2 different stories. Hope you don’t read too much into it.
Bob
December 4th, 2011
10:35 pm
From what I read here, Bama’s loss to LSU was a “quality loss.” “Our loss was better than their loss.” Hmm. I wonder what Bear would have thought of that concept. He probably would have noted there are only Ws and Ls, not QLs.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
10:35 pm
Wrong kerry. Teams often jump over other teams. Lsu beating tenn, which blew you out made sense to jump over you. Their body of work was better and you both had identical records. Nothing you write is logical.
The Bear
December 4th, 2011
10:35 pm
@kerryb that is a good point and that was discussed at length with an NCAA official not long ago on one of the networks. Guess what there is nothing in the NCAA rule book saying you have to win your conference to go to the national Title Game.
just sayin'
December 4th, 2011
10:36 pm
It ain’t about determining a national champion….it’s all about money. Get over it.
Hamilton
December 4th, 2011
10:36 pm
The BCS just made an enemy of T Boone Pickens. Bad for them, good for fans.
Vote with your dollar. I am done with college football until they get a playoff.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:36 pm
Bradley… sadly you are paid to post this garbage. My guess is you don’t hold a Harris poll vote and for good reason. If after 12 games you couldn’t see that Bama was a better team than Oklahoma State… I would suspect you just don’t know the game of football.
DelServDawg
December 4th, 2011
10:36 pm
As far as I know by rule the winner of any football game is the team that scores the most points, regardless of how they were scored. The BCS, and the polling system before it, doesn’t recognize that simple fact. Those systems are based on the “look” of one football team against another, for example Alabama and Oklahoma State. The ONLY fair way to decide a national champion is a play-off system that rewards the conference champions, decided by regular season victories, with the opportunity to play other conference champions in a single-elimination bracket that ultimately brings two teams together to play for the national championship. This eliminates all of the “talking heads,” opinions, strength of conferences, strength of schedules, and just about anything else you can think of. It ain’t rocket science and it can be done. Only big money prevents it from happening.
Keno
December 4th, 2011
10:36 pm
I agree 100%. We’ve seen Alabama and LSU play once, and we know Alabama is fully capable of beating LSU, but the point is they didn’t beat them. Let somebody else play LSU. Let LSU prove they can humble a Big Twelve (or whatever) passing team. I’m sure they can win, but who knows. What I saw of the Oklahoma-Oklahoma State game looked awful for Oklahoma. They kept screwing up and giving up opportunities. I was surprised to see an Oklahoma team play so poorly. Nobody wants to see Alabama get another shot at LSU.
DawginTX
December 4th, 2011
10:37 pm
I meant “strong points.”
Rodney Dangerfield
December 4th, 2011
10:37 pm
Herbie should give every team the eyeball test before the season starts, then declare two teams to play in the BCS and end it right then and there instead of leading us along all season saying we don’t need a playoff because every game counts. No every game does not count unless you are in the SEC.
Realist
December 4th, 2011
10:37 pm
GTBob, Bama and Ok State each beat one top 10 team (Arkansas for Bama, Kansas State for OSU). Bama beat 3 teams in final BCS top 25, Okie State beat 4. Fact is, resumes were close, final numbers were close, but Bama is in championship game largely because they lost to a better team, and their best win was to a higher ranked team.
Shine
December 4th, 2011
10:37 pm
What other sport does college football remind me of now? WWE and TNA wrestlin. Its only worth watchin or discussin for entertainment and drama puroses, ya know, like a play at a theatre.
Shameful, disgraceful, pathetic, rigged. Wont be any coming back from this bs.
CJ
December 4th, 2011
10:38 pm
I am buying the fist round in NOLA. Roll Tide!
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
kerryb…. haa haa suck it up son. There’s always next year. You don’t really want some Big 12 school playing for all the marbles do ya? SEC baby!!
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
Now that’s funny, a ranting Bama person calling someone inbred. That’s like the pot calling the kettle black. When are these stupid Bama fans going to realize that if it wasn’t for the great state of GEORGIA they would not have enough players to beat Ole Miss. There sure isn’t enough players in that in bred state to field decent team.
Cloudodust
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
5IML , Please note not everybody is whining. Those whining have a beef with the BCS 2011 vs maybe 2007. They don’t but they do make the point and if the shoe were on a rematch foot of, say, Ohio State and Michigan, I’d probably be peazzed too.
Atlanta87
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
Because OK State won their conference and Bama didn’t. You bammers are more retarded than you look. Has this turned into best out of 3 now? Idiotic system and fans supporting it.
Dick
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
No matter what happens in the NC game, LSU can already call them selves National champions:
They can beat Bama and be out right , OR lose and be co-champions(it would be their first lost)
but bottom line I hope LSU beats the hell out of bama
MS
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
The BCS does not determine a national champion. College football is about college football fans getting to go to fun places for bowl games. This year, what is labeled the BCS championship bowl game is just the SEC championship rematch. I won’t be watching it, I did that the first time around.
vic the mick
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
There was a simple way for Iowa State to fix this, JUST WIN… They didn’t and now they want to cry about it. Please…Luckily for UGA that they didnt have to play BAMA, cause it would have been South Carolina playing in the Championship game Saturday. When the schedule was made FOUR years ago it was Bama playing Florida at the swamp, right in the middle of the Tebow phase, nobody could envision UF’s fall, so don’t whine about strengh of schedule. The SEC proposed a playoff of four teams in 2007 but nobody lisitend. So now all we have is the busted BCS. Oh, and Mark the Alabama “brand” has 13 National Championships, so it aint all hype and sunshine.
SEC
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
What if this was Notre Dame with one loss??? They have never been conference champs or won any divisions. Lou Holtz would have stood up on his desk to get them in the game. Tell them to join a league!!!!!!!!
LesMiles
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
I think I just crapped in my pants. Why couldn’t it have been the cowpokes dear Lord? I got to go and see if I go find a way to get Alabama to leave 19 points on the field again and gift us a win – I’d sure love to have me another championship – it’d be the second one Saban gifted me
Lamar
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
BOY YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD!!! I have watched college football for years, about 32, but I AM TIRED OF THE CROOKED CRAP THEY CALL A FAIR SYSTEM!! A team like Bama, gets in on the NCG on SOMETHING THAT LEFT GA OUT OF IT ON! College football has to be breaking FAIR ACTS LAWS. IF I WAS RICHT AND GA, I WOULD SUE THE SYSTEM THAT CHEATED ME IN 2007 ! They all will DIE AND GO TO H**LL!!
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:40 pm
The Bear, I know. so why were they applying that rule in 2007?
SEC Fact Finder
December 4th, 2011
10:40 pm
tmc
December 4th, 2011
9:33 pm
SEC Fact Finder-
Your argument is false. The “body of work” of which you speak favors OSU not Alabama. You might want to do a little research before you type.
(unless you want to show your ignorance? in that case, job well done!)
tmc, I am not one to argue with people who do not read my entire post. I know I am BIASED. That is a fact. I also compared the loss to Iowa St by Oklahoma to and SEC team losing to Vanderbilt.
You want to call someone out, please read my previous post. The next thing you need to catch up on is the fact that Iowa St. lost again on Saturday. The body of work of playing the SEC week in and week out is much greater than playing teams( who some have deemed) as the best conference in the country. I will gladly argue that teams like Mississippi St, Florida and Georgia would be right at the top of that conference if they played those teams. The fact that even Vegas Odds makers had OKSU as a 10 point underdog to LSU makes my point very relevant. UGA started out as a 10.5 point underdog to LSU. The opening line as LSU by 2.5 over Alabama.
My final point is this. I have seen every team in the SEC from the sidelines or pressbox with the exception of Kentucky, I watched the Oklahoma at FSU game from the sidelines, the LSU and Oregon game from the pressbox, the Texas A&M verse Arkansas game from the sideline and trying to compare those teams athletes on both sides of the ball to SEC teams is so far off that it is funny.
Oklahoma, Texas and Oklahoma St( T. Boone Pickens) all decided they were better than everyone else in their conference and wanted to guarantee that two of their teams would end up in BCS games, keep more money in their pockets and you saw teams leave the conference in packs. Then they saw they were getting left out and tried to join a weak Pac 10 ONLY to get Rejected. The next order of business was to fire their commissioner and bring in a guy who was the former Big 8 Commissioner to sell an idea of unity. Well folks that horse left the barn and he ran to the neighbors farm. The fact that losing to a 6-6 team who by all accounts is probably a 4-8 team in this conference says a great deal how ineffective a conference and poor those teams really are as a whole. When your 5th and 6th best teams are averaging 40 plus points a game it indicates that your conference is more worried about scoring points than they are about stopping teams from scoring.
And just in case you did not get the memo, Defense wins championships, offenses just sell a great deal of foam fingers pronouncing a team is No.1
Atlanta87
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
“I am buying the fist round in NOLA. Roll Tide!” Yeah I bet you would like a fist up your @ss CJ. I’m sure Saban will do it for you, you sick loser.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
SEC tried to push the +1 system…. only the ACC would have it. Best of both worlds… Bama will get #14 and rest of nation is pissed off enough to force the +1. It’s great to be a BAMA fan!!!
the inconvenient truth
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
sorry all you UGA clowns…………….you got boatraced by LSU………………you dropped a load on the field……………..so maybe you all should SHUT YOUR REDNECK BUBBA PIEHOLES and stop talking about whether Bama does or does not deserve to be in the BCS title game. THEY ARE….YOU WILL GET TO PLAY IN THE TIDY FLUSH BOWL. SEE IF YOU CAN WIN THIS YEAR, AND NOT CRAP YOUR PANTS LIKE YOU DID AGAINST……………WHO?……….LAST YEAR
YOU ARROGANT HOLES– YOU WIN ONCE IN 31+ YEARS AND YOU THINK YOU ARE AN ELITE PROGRAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! lololololololololololololololololololololololol
GO RECRUIT SOME MORE 5 STAR HIGH SCHOOLERS THAT RICHT WONT BE ABLE TO COACH UP…………..LOOK WHERE SABAN AND MILE’S 4 AND 5 STARS ARE HEADING………………AND WHERE THEY HAVE BEEN
Shine
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
Blackoutanyone? Did you watch all 12 Bama games and all 12 OSU games? Does anybody watch all the games?
aol.com
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
You tell the truth , fans are get screwed again!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
SEC Fact Finder
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
tmc, I am not one to argue with people who do not read my entire post. I know I am BIASED. That is a fact. I also compared the loss to Iowa St by Oklahoma to and SEC team losing to Vanderbilt.
Should have typed “Oklahoma St.” not Oklahoma….
Cloudodust
December 4th, 2011
10:41 pm
Let’s just approach it like the good old days. Go out and win your dang bowl game…SEC
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:42 pm
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:39 pm
kerryb…. haa haa suck it up son. There’s always next year. You don’t really want some Big 12 school playing for all the marbles do ya? SEC baby!!
_______________________________________________________________________________
At least OKie state won their conference
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:42 pm
if any of you watched the first game i think you seen who really is the best team in the country. the #1 team in the country was held without a td.
The Bear
December 4th, 2011
10:42 pm
@kerryb its all about money period! Sad but true
DP
December 4th, 2011
10:43 pm
Bradley, you’re so in the bag for Georgia as to be pathetic. Tell us again how Georgia was the “standard bearer of the SEC” from 2002 to 2005 while LSU won a national championship, Auburn had a perfect season but didn’t get to play for a national championship and Georgia did neither.
In 2007, Georgia lost 2 games including one to Tennessee by 3 touchdowns, and you whine like Bulldog Nation that they should have played for a national championship.
Alabama is #1 nationally in every defensive category while OK State’s defense wasn’t in the top 100 before last night’s game. They lost at home in OT by 3 to LSU, which has blown out everybody else they’ve played, and Alabama blew out everybody else they played. They beat Georgia yesterday 70 miles from Georgia’s campus by 32 and you say that’s a sign of improvement for Georgia. That’s the same LSU team Alabama played to a tie game for 60 minutes. Yet you pretend to believe OK State, which plays in a league where the games look like flag football and lost as a 27 point favorite to a team that lost 5 games, has a better body of work than Alabama?
You regularly have written about Georgia’s 10 game winning streak without mentioning that they only won the SEC East because they didn’t play LSU, Alabama or Arkansas. And now you write about Alabama not playing Georgia and South Carolina, as if they wouldn’t have smoked them both?
You are a complete homer and a joke.
Ken Stallings
December 4th, 2011
10:43 pm
Bradley,
This is exactly why so many people say you post stuff you don’t believe in merely to get a reaction.
The Tide wasn’t selected because of their “brand.” They were selected because their RPI was #2, and they were ranked #2 in all the human polls. The system worked precisely as it is supposed to work, as it was written to work, and as it was designed to work!
I’m not even an Alabama alum, not even an SEC alum.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:43 pm
Atlanta87… lol sick but funny
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
10:43 pm
Realist, I understand that argument, but watching Oklahoma St destroy a good Oklahoma team, and win a pretty tough conference overrules the Iowa St mishap. Ok St missed a field goal late in the Iowa St game. If they made it then would that make them a better football team then Bama?
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:44 pm
Blackoutanyone? I think Okie State has the offense that has a better chance than Alabama does. Your offense is 90% Trent Richardson. They are just going to load up to stop Richardson because they know McCaron can’t
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
10:44 pm
WHY DO YOU THINK ADAMS (UGA PRESIDENT) DIDNT GET THE NCAA JOB? IT WAS ABOUT THAT SAME TIME THAT ESPN HASHED OUT THEIR CURRENT 15 YEAR CONTRACT WITH THE SEC. HOW INAPPROPRIATE WOULD IT APPEAR, IF THERE WAS A FORMER SEC SCHOOL PRESIDENT IN CHARGE OF A (CORRUPT) SYSTEM COLLUDING TO PLACE THE CONFERENCE HE WAS ONCE REPRESENTING AT THE FOREFRONT OF ALL OTHER CONFERENCES, TO ENSURE ESPN IT’S LARGE PIECE OF FISCAL PIE.
By representing the conference as powerful and unyielding each and every year and not pairing them with the most powerful out of conference teams in bowl games (ala UGA vs HAWAII vice UGA vs. USC in 2007), it ensures that the best High School athletes (the one’s with NFL aspirations) will give SEC schools the benefit of the doubt and consider them first and foremost. They can only take so many of the best athletes each year. Usually the most athletic and smartest. Everyone else gets the rest. To gain some equal footing those schools have had to break a few rules to entice these athletes away from the SEC. The media (ESPN has their hands in a lot of pockets) has created this powerhouse conference but refuses to allow them to prove it on the field. Yeah, you get the token games like a young talented but inexperienced UGA team against a seasoned Boise St team in the first game of the year. And LSU vs. OREGON, again early in the year, knowing that with their “strength of schedule” a loss could be overcome and explained when referencing their “BODY OF WORK” at the end of the year. All of this is thought out well in advance. It’s calculated and no other college sport has that kind of open end of year format that allows for politicing and smoozing to determine who is going to play for a championship that doesn’t even exist in any kind of official records.
REDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!!! WHEN ARE WE GOING TO WISE UP??? BOYCOTT THIS GAME AND MAKE IT VOCAL. IT REALLY DOESN’T MATTER WHO WINS OR LOSES THIS GAME ANYWAY. NEITHER TEAM HAS AN OFFENSE THAT CAN MOVE THE BALL ON THE OTHER and LSU HAS ALL BUT BEEN DECLARED NATIONAL CHAMPIONS REGARDLESS. I WONDER HOW OK ST WOULD DO WITH THEIR POWERFUL OFFENSE. Would it be a scoring duel? UGA proved that if you have players that can execute and hold on to the football, you can score against LSU’s vaunted defense (they dropped two sure touchdown passes in the first half…youngsters). And their offense can be stopped or slowed down. I believe OK ST would give them a run for their money….no pun intended.
After this season is over, ESPN has some explaining to do. AND I HOPE THERE IS A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GETS INVOLVED BECAUSE I DON’T TRUST CONGRESS EITHER. You can bet, with the kind of money involved in this thing, anybody can be bought.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
10:44 pm
Because you got blown out by tennessee kerry you dumbass. alabama lost in ot by 3. lsu lost twice that year like you but both losses were close, 6 and 2 points and in triple ot. again you got BLOWN OUT and lsu BEAT the team that BLEW you out. DUH Dumbass.
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
10:44 pm
kerryb:
You hit on the beauty contest aspect of the BCS.
WHY WOULD ANY SCHOOL OR FAN BUY INTO THAT HYPOCRISY?
The voters who love you this year might just hate you next year.
The so called, “RULES” the talking heads claim to follow change each year.
This is a beauty contest. The resulting matchups are meaningless.
OkSU has a legitimate argument for playing against LSU. The problem is ESPN has deemed them unworthy. So they won’t get their shot.
I wonder….if LSU loses to Alabama and OkSU wins their bowl…is is possible they would leap over Bama for #1?
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
10:45 pm
the inconvenient truth, are you Bama Stan? Chill out dude…it’s just a game.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:45 pm
they didnt stop us last game but we sure stopped them.
GT Fan
December 4th, 2011
10:45 pm
All of those bellyaching about the NC game should take a deep breath and remember that all of the schools involved sold their souls to the television/BCS/ESPN devil for financial gain. Why else do we have college football on Tuesday and Thursday and three times as many bowl games as can reasonable be construed to be rewarding excellent performance? A set of rules exists, contracts exist, and the rules were followed in the naming of the final two contenders for the crystal football. Whether you like it or not, the procedures were followed. Those who don’t like it should convince their favorite institution to drop out of the BCS and give up the money. Don’t hold your breath on that outcome! At the end of the day, the crystal football is only of importance for a short time. Anyone remember who won it in 2003 without looking at a reference?
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:46 pm
espn didnt vote. the coaches did.
bamaboy
December 4th, 2011
10:46 pm
Georgia you and The Atl rag are a joke. You got a taste of the SEC West yesterday.
When is the next Black out at the Dog Bowl.Remeber that one? I wish we played
GA. every year. Roll Tide!
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
10:46 pm
kerryb… Southern Miss won there’s as well. What’s your point? Look I understand being upset about 2007. Who wouldn’t be? But if you know football.. which I would guess you do.. then you can’t deny Bama is one of the two best teams and Oky State isn’t. Beyond that the rest is fluff to argue about.
Dick
December 4th, 2011
10:47 pm
Enter your comments here
Dacusville Bill
December 4th, 2011
10:47 pm
Why bother with a National Champ Game? Just award it to whoever wins the SEC and let whoever beats Vanderbilt in a bowl game be Number 13 behind all the SEC teams–
cmon man
December 4th, 2011
10:47 pm
uga fans are so jealous of any other sec school having success, particularly Bama. if uga nation would focus the energy on their own program they would be much better off than wishing the worst for others in the sec. in 2007 uga got blown out by Tenn and lost to unranked South Carolina team but still believe they deserved to be in the big game. they lobbied so hard that in 2008 they started the year at number 1 but then said it was too much pressure to be number 1. also at the beginning of this year most uga fans wanted richt gone, now he is a great coach after 10 low quality wins and blown out in their own house by LSU. UGA needs to stay on the porch because they never have nor they never will run with the big dogs. should change their name to the uga puppies.
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
10:47 pm
WHY DO YOU THINK ADAMS (UGA PRESIDENT) DIDNT GET THE NCAA JOB? IT WAS ABOUT THAT SAME TIME THAT ESPN HASHED OUT THEIR CURRENT 15 YEAR CONTRACT WITH THE SEC. HOW INAPPROPRIATE WOULD IT APPEAR, IF THERE WAS A FORMER SEC SCHOOL PRESIDENT IN CHARGE OF A (CORRUPT) SYSTEM COLLUDING TO PLACE THE CONFERENCE HE WAS ONCE REPRESENTING AT THE FOREFRONT OF ALL OTHER CONFERENCES, TO ENSURE ESPN IT’S LARGE PIECE OF FISCAL PIE.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:47 pm
i know it wasnt ga for sure
DP
December 4th, 2011
10:48 pm
It’s too bad Georgia doesn’t have a “brand”, isn’t it? This Alabama team would whip any team Georgia has ever fielded.
The Bear
December 4th, 2011
10:48 pm
@GT Fan there was alot of talk by several schools dropping out of the NCAA this year.
SEC Fact Finder
December 4th, 2011
10:48 pm
Lets ask one more question.
Put Oklahoma St, Oklahoma, Texas and Baylor in the SEC. Give them Florida or Tennessee’s schedule, where do they finish. This was just an odd year where UGA did not play the top three teams in the conference, in normal years they play at least two of the top 4 teams in the conference and yet UGA still has a heck of a team, played LSU great for 33 minutes.
My opnion is that Oklahoma St would have lost two to three, Oklahoma would have lost 4, Texas would have lost 5 to 7, and Baylor would have lost 5 to 7. Got to have more respect for Texas A & M for realizing that finishing 6 and 6 was not good enough, fired their coach and know that playing in the SEC means upgrading their entire program.
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
10:48 pm
BC$ Slave, absolutely no way that would happen…would be funny though
Realist
December 4th, 2011
10:49 pm
GTBob, I don’t know who would win if Bama and Ok State played. But I watched Bama dominate a lot of teams this year, and I’m not sure how good a banged up Oklahoma team is at this moment. Fact is, both teams had control of the situation, both lost on missed field goals, and left it up to a bunch of voters and computers.
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
10:49 pm
By representing the conference as powerful and unyielding each and every year and not pairing them with the most powerful out of conference teams in bowl games (ala UGA vs HAWAII vice UGA vs. USC in 2007), it ensures that the best High School athletes (the one’s with NFL aspirations) will give SEC schools the benefit of the doubt and consider them first and foremost. They can only take so many of the best athletes each year. Usually the most athletic and smartest. Everyone else gets the rest. To gain some equal footing those schools have had to break a few rules to entice these athletes away from the SEC. The media (ESPN has their hands in a lot of pockets) has created this powerhouse conference but refuses to allow them to prove it on the field. Yeah, you get the token games like a young talented but inexperienced UGA team against a seasoned Boise St team in the first game of the year. And LSU vs. OREGON, again early in the year, knowing that with their “strength of schedule” a loss could be overcome and explained when referencing their “BODY OF WORK” at the end of the year. All of this is thought out well in advance. It’s calculated and no other college sport has that kind of open end of year format that allows for politicing and smoozing to determine who is going to play for a championship that doesn’t even exist in any kind of official records.
Jay
December 4th, 2011
10:49 pm
So I guess the ny giants didn’t deserve to win the sb in 2008 cause they lost to NE the last week of the season and they also didn’t win their division. Nice logic.
the inconvenient truth
December 4th, 2011
10:50 pm
HEY ms– NO ONE GIVES A RAT’S ass WHETHER OR NOT you WILL WATCH BAMA AND lsu AGAIN………………BET A lot OF FOLKS will WATCH– DID YOU SEE THE RATINGS FOR FIRST GAME?
GOD YOU UGA FANS ARE LOSERS– JUST LIKE YOU COACH, AND YOUR SPORTS WRITERS……………HEY BRADLEY– BAMA’S “BRAND” HAS WON A BOATLOAD OF NC……….GUESS TO A BAMA HATER LIKE YOU THAT ACCOUNTS FOR NOTHING………….THANK GOD most of the country, who actually WATCHED these games, saw that bama can do what NO ONE else in the country can do…………stand toe to toe with LSU
your choice of ok state explains why you can watch Mark Richt led teams year after year and actually think you can win anything of importance with tat collection of underacheivng, undisaplined thugs.
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
10:50 pm
REDICULOUS!!!!!!!!!!! WHEN ARE WE GOING TO WISE UP??? BOYCOTT THIS GAME AND MAKE IT VOCAL. IT REALLY DOESN’T MATTER WHO WINS OR LOSES THIS GAME ANYWAY. NEITHER TEAM HAS AN OFFENSE THAT CAN MOVE THE BALL ON THE OTHER and LSU HAS ALL BUT BEEN DECLARED NATIONAL CHAMPIONS REGARDLESS. I WONDER HOW OK ST WOULD DO WITH THEIR POWERFUL OFFENSE. Would it be a scoring duel? UGA proved that if you have players that can execute and hold on to the football, you can score against LSU’s vaunted defense (they dropped two sure touchdown passes in the first half…youngsters). And their offense can be stopped or slowed down. I believe OK ST would give them a run for their money….no pun intended.
After this season is over, ESPN has some explaining to do. AND I HOPE THERE IS A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GETS INVOLVED BECAUSE I DON’T TRUST CONGRESS EITHER. You can bet, with the kind of money involved in this thing, anybody can be bought.
Yankee
December 4th, 2011
10:50 pm
Bradley, you are a minor scribbler/flack, and you have no more credibility than the BCS or any pundits. You are merely a little pimp for the Braves, Falcons, UGA, GT — or whatever loser you desire to flog in that dinosaur for which you toil.
Dick
December 4th, 2011
10:51 pm
damn alabama fans, you guys have to come in the great state of GA to get the 4/5 state recruits, the state of bama dont have the caliber of players that GA does ….hahaha
bitter michael jackson
December 4th, 2011
10:51 pm
TREE KILLERS—————–trolls with a rebel flag
War Dang Dawg
December 4th, 2011
10:51 pm
Who cares, it’s all nonsense anyway. I’d rather be in Okie State’s shoes than Bama’s anyway. Okie State won the only legit title they could play for, and Bama lost the only legit title it could play for. A mythical championship is good for bragging rights, but not much else.
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
10:52 pm
Bama choked during regulation, and especially in OT vs LSU…they gave up 300+ yds rushing to the mighty Ga Southern. They don’t deserve to get another chance.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:52 pm
Dan, LSU needed a INT for a TD near the end of the game to barely beat TN in the championship game and lost their last game at home in 2007. UGA after that TN game was beating all of their opponents by 30 points. That UGA team would have crushed that LSU team in the title game on 07 if they had a chance to play them
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:52 pm
if you think they are mad now, just wait till BAMA blows them out like the blackout.
DEEP THROAT
December 4th, 2011
10:52 pm
After this season is over, ESPN has some explaining to do. AND I HOPE THERE IS A CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION AND THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE GETS INVOLVED BECAUSE I DON’T TRUST CONGRESS EITHER. You can bet, with the kind of money involved in this thing, anybody can be bought.
Dawgs1965
December 4th, 2011
10:53 pm
Hey, Mark? If Alabama loses to LSU on January 9, what are the chances the BCS can organize another game in early February to decide the national championship? Because it appears that if you’re Alabama you get to play the number one team until you win.
Dick B
December 4th, 2011
10:53 pm
damn alabama fans, you guys have to come in the great state of GA to get the 4/5 state recruits, the state of bama dont have the caliber of players ….hahaha hahaha
Lamar
December 4th, 2011
10:53 pm
HEY INCONVENIENT TRUTH!!! YOU HAVE TO BE A BAMA FAN!! WHY? Because only somebody from a REDNECK state with a THUG FOR A COACH would like to see this NCG! OLD MILES TOOK OVER FOR SATAN AT LSU AND HAS WHIPPED OLD SATANS BUTT EVERY TIME THEY PLAY! TRUTH BE TOLD, I BET OLD SATAN WOULD RATHER BE COACHING LSU OVER THE BAMA JOB!! BY THE WAY, NEXT YEAR WE GET YOUR REDNECK BUTTS, AND WILL BEAT YOU LIKE A DRUM! AT LEAST WE COULD SCORE A TD ON LSU, HOW MANY TDS DID OLD SATAN SCORE????? ZEROOOOO!!! REDNECK!
Dick B
December 4th, 2011
10:53 pm
Enter your comments here
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
10:53 pm
When this season is over, UA will have nothing to be recognized for…no division title, no conference title, no BCS title. At least UGA has a division title, lol.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:54 pm
Jay
December 4th, 2011
10:49 pm
So I guess the ny giants didn’t deserve to win the sb in 2008 cause they lost to NE the last week of the season and they also didn’t win their division. Nice logic.
___________________________________________________________________________
You’re comparing apples to oranges. If you can’t see the difference you have no sense. the NFL has a playoff system. The season IS the playoff system in college football.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:54 pm
bama has gave up 9 tds in 12 games. you can have all the yards you want buddy.
DP
December 4th, 2011
10:54 pm
Georgia loses to LSU by 32 and Bradley writes of Georgia that “progress is evident”. Alabama took LSU to overtime, blew out everybody else they played, and Bradley pretends that he believes that makes Alabama’s body of work less impressive than Oklahoma State. He pretends that Georgia, which lost 2 games in 2007 including a 3 touchdown beating from Tennessee, had a claim to the BCS championship game in 2007 that is comparable to Alabama’s case this year.
Steve Spurrier was right about Bradley.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
10:55 pm
This blog is sponsored by Kleenex and Arbor Mist.
IlliniDawg
December 4th, 2011
10:55 pm
Interesting that the only folks ripping MB and defending ESPN are Bama fans. But I guess if the shoe were on the other foot, we Dawg fans would probably be doing the same thing. In the end, I wonder if Bama fans care one bit that a vast majority of the country does not want to see this game again.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:56 pm
I guess to decide the championship this year you have to play the best 2 out 2 if you’re LSU. In Alabama’s case it will be the best 1 out 2.
Bob
December 4th, 2011
10:56 pm
Bama can be called the best team in the nation, despite failing to win its own division and conference, by splitting a season series with LSU? That makes no sense. If the SEC is the best conference in the country, then the SEC champ is the national champion, end of story. The Hat’s already won it, Bama fans just haven’t figured it out.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:56 pm
uga has a coach that is 3-16 against ranked teams in his last 19 tries. i wouldnt even call the east a division.
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
10:56 pm
So will people feel good about Alabama being National Champions if they win a close game against LSU?
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
10:57 pm
I suppose the difference between this year and 2007 is the fact that Alabama is a top tier program with a tradition for winning big games and championships.
wesley
December 4th, 2011
10:58 pm
This is to bama grad, well alabama doesn’t deserve to be there either, they didn’t win their division or conference for that matter, funny how the argument about winning your conference doesn’t apply to saban and his minions, but let it be any other team, i.e., UGA in 2007 and those rules are strickly enforced, funny how that happens huh?? au had their shot and they blew it the first time around, you know it, the country knows it and ESPN sure as hell knows it, but they can’t keep their collective noses out of saban’s ass long enough to realize it) that Ok St belongs in the National championship, not bama, not by any stretch, hope LSU rips bama a new one…..
Crenshawcrusher
December 4th, 2011
10:58 pm
I Won’t watch either, LSU should play OSU and then if LSU won, they would have beaten Conference Champions from Big East, Big 12, Pac 12, etc.
This isn’t sports, this is American Football Idol.
Had the Baseball playoffs been run this way, we would have let the Phillies go to the World Series over the Cardinals since they were supposed to be the better team. They should ban all conference championships if they don’t mean anything. If there is ever a real championship, sometimes the most popular teams do not get to the championship games.
Every Game Counts unless you have a large ESPN contract with the conference, then some games count for more.
War Dang Dawg
December 4th, 2011
10:58 pm
“And now we’re faced with this scenario: A winner of nothing save some eyeball test can split two games against another team … and be declared national champ. Some “system” this is.”
Bingo, it’s not a system, it’s a farce. But that’s nothing new, the concept of a “national champion” in college football has always been a farce. At least in the past they played all of the major bowl games and then sorted it out. Now, they deem only two teams worthy of being crowned and pit them in a winner take all match. It’s a joke.
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
10:58 pm
DP, most analysts agree that LSU is a better team now than the one that faced Bama earlier as Jefferson has gotten on track. Also, LSU lost to Kentucky and Arkansas in 2007…TN was the freaking east div champs. Anyway, Bama will get their behinds handed to them and will have nothing to show for this season.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
10:58 pm
DP, I think what he is saying is that UGA was #4 in the BCS when the 1 and 2 teams lost and didn’t get to move up. A team that beat it’s last 6 opponents by 30 points in each game and was playing better than anyone in the country at that time.
BAMAFAN
December 4th, 2011
10:59 pm
ROLL TIDE ROLL. I named my son Saban after one of the best football coaches. ROLL TIDE ROLL.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
10:59 pm
people are hating because they all watched the first game and know who should have won and this time we will.
Caligula
December 4th, 2011
10:59 pm
Bradley has had a major case of redazz against UA since his tea and crumpets buddy Curry ran from competition to Kentucky. I LOL at the butthurt
DP
December 4th, 2011
10:59 pm
Bradley can’t bring himself to mention that Georgia was only in the SEC championship game this year because they didn’t play any of the best 3 teams in the league, LSU, Alabama and Arkansas. We saw yesterday what happened when they finally played one of them. But then Bradley writes that Alabama didn’t play Georgia, as if Alabama wouldn’t have welcomed the chance to beat Georgia like a drum.
What a pathetic joke.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
10:59 pm
UGA fans: perpetually jealous of the Tide.
Boycott 'em....
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
hit ‘em where it hurts, don’t watch the game….. Boycott the BCS Championship! I am a lifetime SEC fan but think the “Re-match” is a bunch of bs. Let the LSU and Bama fans watch the game, everyone else tune into Andy Griffith re-runs.
I don’t get these Bama fans either who think they should get a re-match and have been talking about since the second the first game ended. How can you lose at home, miss however many field goals it was, not win the division or play for the conference title, and still expect to play in the national championship. If Bama is fortunate enough to win then what will they be, “Co-Champions”…the record will be the same 1 – 1. Shouldn’t they then play another game to REALLY decide who is champion. If the first loser gets a mulligan shouldn’t the second? I am sure Bama fans will find some way to justify things.
I say Boycott the BCS….maybe if the viewership is appallingly low for the game it will help stir the pot for a playoff system. Hit them where it hurts, in the wallet.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
GTBob… ohhh hell yea. I’ll take 3-0 and feel great about it. You?
the inconvenient truth
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
poor Eric C…………………..go do what all good “dawgs” do after getting a national TV humiliating ASSWHUPPING from a better team…………………go lick your wounds…………..you know what i mean, dont you, loser????? Watch Bama……………learn how a winner plays in a big game………….they may win or lose, but they WONT CRAP THEIR PANTS LIKE THE MIGHTY DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
GOD WHAT A SMALL PROGRAM YOU FOLKS HAVE……………..1 NC WIN IN 31 YEARS, AND YOU DIDNT PLAY BAMA THAT YEAR……………….
WHEN IS YOUR NEXT BLACKOUT ERIC???????????
LOOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Dick B
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
dan alabama fans, you guys have to come in the great state of GA to get the 4/5 state recruits, the state of bama dont have the caliber of players ….hahaha
rudy
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
Bradley eats feces for breakfast…always has.
wesley
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
to kerryb, the reason they met again in the Super Bowl you idiot is because one team is from the NFC and one from the AFC and the NFL does have something called the playoffs, make sense now?? Thing before you speak……
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
eric c did you see jefferson play yesterday? bama would have defenitely blowed them out.
Crenshawcrusher
December 4th, 2011
11:01 pm
Time to Occupy BCS and boycott the BCS championship game and any of their sponsers.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:01 pm
Justice would be that no matter what happens in this game they should name LSU champs.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:01 pm
You can’t lose your division and play in the title game. Right Dawgs?
You know the best thing about this season? More years of Mark Richt to come!!!
5IML
December 4th, 2011
11:01 pm
wesley,
There is no rule about winning your conference, division, state, or zip code. Can you guys let 2007 go?! You had two horrible losses that year. It was four years ago.
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
11:02 pm
What all this proves is that we have a system that makes the national championship game meaningless to everyone but koolaid drinking fans of those two “LUCKY” teams.
The teams in the MNC are LUCKY because voters are fickle.
That’s the point made very clearly in the arguments about past BCS mistakes.
The rules in voters minds change every year.
It is nothing more than a beauty contest.
tyler
December 4th, 2011
11:02 pm
So many of your points were absolute nonsense….We both know that Bama is the second best team in the nation. Period. You can’t lose to a 6-6 team and play for a natl title. Your article may have had some validity if it weren’t for the fact that winning your conference is NOT part of the requirements to play in the Natl Championship Game (a rule that was prob put in place b/c of Notre Dame). You can’t compare Ok St and Bama fairly anyway- no common opponents- all you can do is look at the body of work. Now, do you honestly think that if Bama had lost to, say Vandy (6-6) that they would have had the opportunity to still play for the title? No way. Wouldn’t happen. And don’t give me “well, if vandy was their only loss then that means that they would have beaten LSU”…leave them out- let’s say Bama’s best win would have been Arkansas (comparable to Ok St)…who gets in then? I would have to say things would probably have turned out differently…..think about it
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:03 pm
Eric C…. wrong. Iron Bowl Champions lol… that means more in this state than you can imagine.. even if Aubarn is pathetic this year.
BCS Logic
December 4th, 2011
11:03 pm
OK, here’s the deal guys. LSU, if you can beat Alabama twice in the season, you will be the national champs. Alabama, if you can beat LSU once in the season, you will be the national champs. Hey, it worked that way for FSU and Florida in ‘96 so why not do it again?
Fair? Not really, but Alabama’s 80-year “body of work” gives them a slight edge over LSU in the “eyeball test.”
Oklahoma State? Never heard of ‘em.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:03 pm
no matter what happens we will never have to get on here and say anything abot ga. their play shows that.
bitter thats capitalism
December 4th, 2011
11:03 pm
folks we all fell in love with corporations and wounder why we get upset with coruption
play off is fair and just but —money and fairness have nothing in common
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:04 pm
wesley
December 4th, 2011
11:00 pm
to kerryb, the reason they met again in the Super Bowl you idiot is because one team is from the NFC and one from the AFC and the NFL does have something called the playoffs, make sense now?? Thing before you speak……
______________________________________________________________________________
Hey nimrod, why don’t you bother reading or learn how. That’s what I was saying. The NFL has a playoff. That’s how two teams meet during the season and in the playoffs. The season is the playoffs in college. Usually you lose you’re out. You must be from Alabama
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:05 pm
Wrong again kerry. Those pesky facts.
Sat, Nov 3 Troy W 44-34 —
Sat, Nov 10 (18) Auburn W 45-20 —
Sat, Nov 17 (22) Kentucky W 24-13 —
Sat, Nov 24 at Georgia Tech W 31-17
Caligula
December 4th, 2011
11:05 pm
Good post tyler. One would think Bradley, college basketball guru that he is, would stop being disingenuous and bringing up the conference champs argument . Hello UConn
Elementary my Dear Watson
December 4th, 2011
11:06 pm
And now we’re faced with this scenario: A winner of nothing save some eyeball test can split two games against another team … and be declared national champ. Some “system” this is.
A great point Bradley. If Bama does when the BCS championship game, why would they be declared champions? Or would they? LSU/Bama split two games, why would Bama be champ? I know, they won the big game and lost regular season game.
A playoff is needed, but it makes to much easy sense for it to ever happen. We are a smart country and we have smart minds, we need to make it happen. This 35 + bowl games a year make me sick and is ridiculous. The next time I hear a team needs to win to become ” Bowl Eligible “, I think I will puke.
DP
December 4th, 2011
11:06 pm
The agenda of Bradley and the rest of Dawg Nation is clear. Go after Alabama to change the subject from the beating LSU put on Georgia at the Dome yesterday.
Georgia laid down and quit yesterday the first time it encountered adversity and Bradley says it’s a sign of progress.
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
11:06 pm
“puppies,”
I saw UGA hold LSU to 12 yds in the first half…but LSU has too much depth. They just wear you out. When Bama plays LSU on a neutral field, it will be all LSU…I’m sorry but that is life. If UGA played Bama yesterday, it would have been much closer in the end. LSU is better than Bama…they beat Ark worse, they beat Auburn worse, and they beat Bama in Bama. It’s already been decided.
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
11:06 pm
kerryb, I agree 100%. Honestly, even if Alabama wins, I don’t see how they could be considered champions over LSU. They would have both beaten each other and LSU has a much better resume.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:07 pm
DAn, they still didnt lose the last game of the year at home like LSU did. Usually you lose late your out.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:07 pm
You both had 2 losses kerry. Your 2 losses were worse than lsu’s that year. Again they lost in triple ot twice. You got blown out by tenn. They BEAT THEM. Man are you dumb.
Bob
December 4th, 2011
11:07 pm
Bama can be called the best team in the nation, despite failing to win its own division and conference, by splitting a season series with LSU? That doesn’t make sense. If the SEC is the best conference in the country, then LSU is already the NC. The Hat’s already won it; Bama fans just haven’t figured it out yet. Geaux Tigers!
5IML
December 4th, 2011
11:08 pm
Hey LSU fans,
I will be in New Orleans Sunday afternoon and ready to party til Tuesday morning–win or lose. (Please note: This message is intended solely for fans of the 2012 BCSCG participants.)
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:09 pm
Note the key word usully. They also won their last game beating a team that blew you out. Get a clue.
Caligula
December 4th, 2011
11:09 pm
Puppy fans on here should not discuss big boy football . Got hit in the mouth yesterday and quit.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:09 pm
At least Okie State would have given LSU a game. Their offense is 10 times better than Alabama’s and LSU already knows how to stop that.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:10 pm
ok st lost and their out.
Shine
December 4th, 2011
11:10 pm
2006, Michigan ranked second in AP and third in Coaches poll after losing to Ohio State. USC was ranked third in AP and second in Coaches. Florida 4th in both.
USC loses last game, Fla wins SEC title game and Michigan has no more games just like Alabama didnt this week. Florida jumps Michigan but OSU doesnt jump Bama after winning its Confernace title against a top 10 opponent?
Shameful, disgraceful, pathetic, rigged.
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
11:10 pm
Dan, you are crazy…losing at Knoxville to the SEC East Champs is not nearly as bad as losing to KY, even if it was in OT
daddo
December 4th, 2011
11:11 pm
I will accept mark’s thesis that Alabama made the national championship game because we are a “brand.” Which means the reason that UGA didn’t make the national championship game in 2007 is because they are not. I know that hurts, Georgia, but the truth hurts. That’s why yall are so pissed and hurt. And guess what, your opinion is as relevant as your team.
Max
December 4th, 2011
11:11 pm
Yep total distraction article from the dogs getting blown out twice in the GA dome in their own state.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
11:11 pm
Hey UGA fans,
I understand that your misdirected anger towards BAMA stems from yesterday’s game.
RedRaiderFan
December 4th, 2011
11:11 pm
Agree with all your comments! Now explain how two 7-5 teams make the BCS poll?
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:11 pm
Dan, thats the stupid thing about losses and how they look. Losses are losses. It depends on how you are playing at the end and at the end UGA could have beaten ANYONE that year at the end. You are talking about a game that happened the first week of October.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:11 pm
kerry b you have to be a delusional bullpuppy. we stopped them. they was the#1 team in the country that didnt score a td.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
11:12 pm
kerryb,
How many top-50 defenses did Okie State face this year?
Realist
December 4th, 2011
11:13 pm
Eric C., Bama and LSU both beat Arkansas by 24 points (Bama 38-14, LSU 41-17). These things are easy to find on the internet. Should be another great game in New Orleans between the two best teams in college football.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:13 pm
Eric C.
December 4th, 2011
11:10 pm
Dan, you are crazy…losing at Knoxville to the SEC East Champs is not nearly as bad as losing to KY, even if it was in OT
__________________________________________________________________________
Or losing to Arkansas in you last game of the year at home. That should have disqualified them but as I remember their coach got in front of the mics when we were ahead of them whining and crying to the media.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:13 pm
Time to let the big boys play, little doggies.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:14 pm
South Carolina was higher ranked, had the same record as GA and BEAT them head to head, therefore GA had no business playing for the SEC championship game.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:14 pm
Tennessee beat kentucky 52-50 that year eric the idiot. Yeah getting blown out by a 3 loss team is not nearly as bad as losing to a 5 loss team in ot. Nice logic from you dogtards.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:14 pm
and it showed on the field.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:14 pm
Actually 4 loss team.
Pollster guy
December 4th, 2011
11:15 pm
Thank you for calling out espn. Tv contracts, money rule this sport, every other sport has figured it out. Even poker has a playoff!!!!!!!!!!!!
get ur facts straight
December 4th, 2011
11:15 pm
I won’t watch. This is crap!
Bigdawg606
December 4th, 2011
11:15 pm
Oklahoma State’s defense was ranked 107th in the country going into Saturday. If they play Bama 10 times they MIGHT win 2 if they get extremely lucky. Same old same old. How did Oregon’s offense look against 2 SEC defense. Certainly not as overwhelming as they did against the PAC 12. And the BIG 12/8 defenses are worse. You may not like it, but the two best teams are playing each other. And I’m a UGA lifer, btw…
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
11:15 pm
So let’s get this straight Dan
The poll voters have to judge schedules, style points in wins, the quality of wins and LOSSES, the brand, the coach, the quality of the fan base…what am I forgetting?
Oh yes…the one thing that matters in a COMPETITIVE sport—head to head play.
Only competition ON THE FIELD should decide championships…not style points or quality of LOSSES!
Ridiculous.
130on2
December 4th, 2011
11:15 pm
Popycock Mark! Yes, OK State is a very good team but the BCS is supposed to pick the 2 best teams. In my opinion there is no doubt that they did so. If you really think OKS is better that Alabama, you must also think they are better than LSU. Maybe they should send OKS and Kansas State or someone to the championship game. Just because the ‘average fan’ wants to see a 65-64 game doesn’t mean they are great teams. Before the BCS the bowls practically insured that the best 2 teams would not meet. Has everyone forgotten that? If you want to really find out who are the best teams, expand to a playoff system using the top 25 or so teams and start paying the players. What people seem to want is a college version of the NFL.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:16 pm
And what disqualified you was getting blown out by tennessee kerry.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:16 pm
5IML
December 4th, 2011
11:12 pm
kerryb,
How many top-50 defenses did Okie State face this year?
________________________________________________________________________
Doesn’t mean they couldn’t have beaten one. I would like to have seen them give it a try but because of the media they will not. Your coach got on TV stumping and whining like a little girl to try and keep that from happening when he was scared of that.
5IML
December 4th, 2011
11:16 pm
kerryb,
You may be new to college football but (in recent history) everytime a high powered offense has faced a team with a defense for the BCSC the offense has lost. Oregon 2011. Texas 2010. Oklahoma 2009. Ohio State 2008 & 2007.
Here’s a little saying I just made up: Defense wins championships. You have my permission to repeat that.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:17 pm
The puppies are just upset cause another National Championship will be won by an SEC team for the sixth year in a row and UGA is not one of them
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:17 pm
Oh, I also forgot that we beat Alabama in Alabama in 2007 too.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:18 pm
The annual UGA reality check just came a few weeks later this year since Florida had such a rough year!
Pollster guy
December 4th, 2011
11:18 pm
Won’t matter, lsu wins by 20, bama is good, but not in same league as lsu
aladawg
December 4th, 2011
11:18 pm
Well I guess this goes to prove that the regular season doesn’t matter because the girls from Toothaloosa lobbied their way to a second date. That 1st game meant nothing nor did ANY games on Saturday….except for “open”………and the hypocrites at ESPN and Puke Fartbaum with their marching orders to promote this rematch simply smell bad. Want to do something about it? Don’t watch it and help bust the ratings. It’s the only way.
DP
December 4th, 2011
11:18 pm
Eric C, LSU and Alabama had 5 common opponents this season. LSU beat them by a combined score of 233-54, Alabama beat them 231-58. You think that’s a significant difference?
LSU and Alabama have clearly been the 2 best teams in college football all season. It’s unfair to LSU to have to beat Alabama twice, but had Alabama won 9-6 in OT, they would have slaughtered Georgia yesterday and would have had to beat LSU for a second time.
I agree with Gary Danielson that LSU should win the AP national championship even if Alabama beats them in the BCS championship game. They deserve at least a share of the national championship for what they’ve already accomplished. Alabama and Oklahoma State should be playing for second place, but that’s not the system that’s in place.
Imagine if Georgia and Florida had blasted every team they played except each other, were clearly the 2 best teams in the country and Georgia had lost to Florida by 3 in OT. Is any Georgia fan going to seriously suggest they wouldn’t think Georgia deserved to play in the BCS championship game against Florida?
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:19 pm
5IML, I was probably watching college football before you were born.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:19 pm
If GA was in ALA’s position and OK state jumped over them you would be able to hear them screaming from sea to shinning sea.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:20 pm
What do LSU, Florida, Tennessee, Alabama, and FREAKING Auburn have in common???
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:20 pm
It’s funny how Les Miles and Nick Saban will cry like little girls to the media to try and get themselves in that game. They have no shame what so ever.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:20 pm
just because they scored 6 tds against puppies so called good defense you dont have to praise them that much just in case you didnt notice they didnt score 1 on us.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:20 pm
They are just upset cause the two best teams are going to play for the NC and neither one of them is GA.
Southern Man
December 4th, 2011
11:20 pm
No one is asking the much simpler question. Why do we even need to crown a champion? I love college football, but I don’t give two turds about who gets the title each year. Whether it was by votes or this terrible system, in the end it doesn’t really change the sport. The players get swag, bragging rights, and little else for playing in the title game. Meanwhile coaches, businessmen and bureaucrats make millions. Same as it ever was. Same as it ever was.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:21 pm
kentucky was NOT a bad team in 2007 and the close results show it
not one bad loss. Again those pesky facts. Lsu won the sec. They beat tenn who blew out the ga. They lost 2 games in triple ot. Ga got blown out plus they lost to a 6 loss sc team that lost it’s final 5 games. Oh but lsu lost their last reg season game by 2 in triple ot! Nice demented logic. It’s like arguing with a brick wall.
Sat, Sep 1 Eastern Kentucky W 50-10 —
Sat, Sep 8 Kent State W 56-20 —
Sat, Sep 15 (9) Louisville W 40-34 —
Sat, Sep 22 at Arkansas W 42-29 —
Sat, Sep 29 Florida Atlantic W 45-17 —
Thu, Oct 4 at (11) South Carolina L 23-38 —
Sat, Oct 13 (1) LSU W 43-37 —
Sat, Oct 20 (14) Florida L 37-45 —
Sat, Oct 27 Mississippi State L 14-31 —
Sat, Nov 10 at Vanderbilt W 27-20 —
Sat, Nov 17 at (8) Georgia L 13-24 —
Sat, Nov 24 (19) Tennessee L 50-52
T.O.
December 4th, 2011
11:21 pm
Bama can be called the best team in the nation, despite failing to win its own division and conference, by splitting a season series with LSU? That doesn’t make sense. If the SEC is the best conference in the country, then LSU is already the NC. The Hat’s already won it; Bama fans just haven’t figured it out yet. Geaux Tigers!
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
11:21 pm
Sour Grapes
Rankings don’t matter. That’s what you don’t get.
All South Carolina had to do was win their conference and division games to get into he SEC championship game.
They didn’t.
That’s how champions are crowned…the win their division and their conference and beat the champions of other conferences.
We need a playoff…not a beauty contest.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:22 pm
Sour Grapes, not nearly as much as Bama fans and their little girl coach would have done if it had actually happened. They would have probably killed some more trees somewhere.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:22 pm
start one up commish
GMAN
December 4th, 2011
11:23 pm
Bradley,
You have never hidden your dislike for Bama. Where does it state in the BCS that you have to win your conference? Especially, when you play in the toughest division of the #1 conference and lose to the #1 team in overtime by a field goal. Anybody, including all you so called SEC supporters who think Okie State would stand a chance against LSU or Bama, you are badly mistaken. Okie State loses to Iowa State, the Ole Miss/Kentucky of the Big 12, and they deserve it over Bama??? Give me a break!
D man
December 4th, 2011
11:24 pm
Waaaaaaaaaaaaa…
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:24 pm
The last time UGA one a title, did you fans (who were alive) have to get up and turn the dial on the TV?
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:24 pm
Round 1:
1. LSU vs 8. Kansas St = Winner LSU
3. Oklahoma State vs 6. Arkansas = Winner Arkansas
4. Stanford vs 5.Oregon Winner = Stanford/Toss Up
2. Alabama vs 7. Boise Winner = Alabama
Round 2:
1. LSU vs 6. Arkansas = Winner Lsu
2. Bama vs 4. Stanford = Winner Bama
BSC Championship:
1. LSU vs 2. Bama = Winner Bama
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:24 pm
If Okie State would have jumped Alabama their idiotic fans would have killed some trees somewhere.
St Simons - we're on Island time
December 4th, 2011
11:24 pm
Don’t be too hard on em. Even if they win, they’ll still be from Alabama.
Theresa
December 4th, 2011
11:25 pm
2 SEC teams playing in the BCS Championship Game just makes it look like they SEC has the BCS in their back pocket. How can we prove the SEC is the best when the SEC isn’t playing a team from another conference? You can’t. Now all of these people are going to be bad mouthing the SEC and saying that there’s no way we can be the best conference because we played each other in the BCS Title Game. I agree with all of those that say it should be 2 teams from 2 different conferences.
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
11:25 pm
If they play Bama 10 times they MIGHT win 2 if they get extremely lucky.
The only problem with this statement is that nobody actually knows if it is true. It could be the complete opposite.
D man
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
SEC 6 years in a row…
Gary
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
High school football can put together an excellent play-off bracket to determine a legitimate state champion and division I college football can’t. I love football but I don’t understand the lack of a playoff system. These arguments happen almost every year about somebody being left out that should be in; it’s ridiculous.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
The annual UGA reality check just came a few weeks late this year due to UF being down.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
St Simons – we’re on Island time
December 4th, 2011
11:24 pm
Don’t be too hard on em. Even if they win, they’ll still be from Alabama.
__________________________________________________________________________
You are so right. The state smells like manure from one line to the other.
sldkfjslk
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
College Football is like wrestling and NASCAR. All three make the rules up as they go then break them with impunity and are cash cows whose milk is lapped up by a gullible public like dumb dogs.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
if if and buts were candy and nuts ga might be good. doubt it.
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:28 pm
Beat Boise if you want to be considered…
Steve
December 4th, 2011
11:28 pm
I don’t want to see a rematch, but if anyone seriously thinks OkSU is better than Alabama they really don’t know football. Sure, the Cowboys might win a one game playoff with Alabama, but if they played it 100 times they would probably lose 70 of them.
Mark, while I have no love of the ESPN folks, the reality is I DID watch a few OkSU games this year and also about a dozen other Big12 games. I’m sorry, but that conference doesn’t play defense. Sure OkSU ripped off a bunch of points, but the tacking was closer to Mtn West than to SEC. It was horrendous. They wouldn’t be able to do that against ‘Bama for one, and for another, they proved time and again this year that they couldn’t stop even the most trivial of offenses.
So no, OkSU does not pass the EYE test.
That being said, I would much rather see LSU v OkSU and I am a huge SEC fan. For one, why should ‘Bama be given a break when both Michigan and Georgia got screwed by the unwritten law of having to win your conference. For another, I wanted to see LSU absolutely destroy OkSU. And lastly, Alabama might be good enough to beat LSU (though I think the first game was LSU’s worst performance in a big game all year). If Alabama beats LSU, then all the SEC-haters are going to go nuts saying we still don’t know who the best team is (never mind the fact it proved Alabama belonged in the game).
Sadly, if LSU wins the argument will be that people really don’t know if they are the best since they weren’t force to play OkSU or Stanford (never mind the fact LSU beat a team that beat Stanford).
Oh .. and as far as OkSU playing more teams with winning records. Take a look at the Big 12 OOC slate this year. IT’S COWARDLY. Almost every team in teat conference ran up their records against OOC patsies, which allowed for more teams with winning records. Meanwhile, the SEC was playing teams like:
– BSU
– GaTech
– Clemson(twice .. ACC Champ)
– Oregon (Pac 12 Champ)
– Penn State
– FSU
– Louisville (tied for Big East champion)
– Texas A&M
– BYU
– LaTech (Wac champions)
– Cincinnati (Big East co-champs)
Now, I am not saying the SEC is b far the best, but as a conference they played a very good OOC slate. They beat the best or one of the best teams in every conference in America except the Big 12, who rarely tangles with the SEC for monetary reasons on both sides).
FACT – It’s easy to finish with an above .500 record playing scrap teams in OOC. Because the computer poll .. and Mark Bradley .. view playing teams with winning records the deal breaker, it shows why both are over-valuing the Big 12 conference as a whole.
DP
December 4th, 2011
11:29 pm
Bradley says Alabama got the nod over OK State because of its brand but doesn’t mention, probably doesn’t even know, that Alabama was #1 nationally in defense against the run, defense against the pass, total defense and scoring defense.
And because Alabama has a brand, they don’t even have a cute nickname for their defense, like “Junkyard Dawgs” for the 1976 defense of Georgia that couldn’t carry the jock straps of the 2011 Alabama defense. And Alabama doesn’t have cute names like “Dream Team” for its recruiting classes even though they outperform Georgia’s recruiting classes. And they don’t wear NIKE combat uniforms or have “black outs”.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:30 pm
sldkfjslk
December 4th, 2011
11:26 pm
College Football is like wrestling and NASCAR. All three make the rules up as they go then break them with impunity and are cash cows whose milk is lapped up by a gullible public like dumb dogs.
____________________________________________________________________________
You are so right. And it causes coaches like Saban and Miles to cry and whine like little girls to get in the BSC game so they can get that extra bonus money.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:30 pm
all your ga boys are coming west kerry b . must stink in ga
HatersGoingtoHate
December 4th, 2011
11:30 pm
You are an idiot. Didn’t play UGA out of the East. HAHAHAHA…… Is that supposed to be a tough game? LSU didn’t think so. Alabama would be undefeated if it played in the Big XII. Hell, even Georgia might be undefeated in that conference.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:30 pm
You would think they would be proud of their conference dominating the way it has for the last six years. They are already all but guaranteeing a victory over Mich State because of their SEC level defense but out of the other side of their mouths they say they don’t think the two most dominating defenses in the country should be playing for the NC, but instead a team that is all offense, no defense. Been there done that. LSU has already beat that type of team in Oregon. I want to see the two best teams play and from how these two teams played earlier this year that is LSU and ALA, like it or not. Who else has stopped LSU this year? Certainly not the bulldogs; 42-10
D man
December 4th, 2011
11:30 pm
First Vegas odds has Bama picked to win… Do you think OSU would have been favored?
Eric
December 4th, 2011
11:31 pm
Mark, normally your columns are suspect and full of opinion to stir up debate, but this one was the best written one of the year for you. So good, that I felt the need to post a comment. Email me and you can buy me a beer next time I’m in Atlanta.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:31 pm
The Tide is Rolling and Nothing can Stop it!!!
December 4th, 2011
11:28 pm
Beat Boise if you want to be considered…
________________________________________
Beat LSU the first chance. When you can’t don’t beg for a do over.
Mike
December 4th, 2011
11:32 pm
This system is a total joke. Great article, Mark. To all those who are sick of this crap, DO NOT TUNE YOUR SETS INTO THIS GAME. Dont watch it. Dont go the sports bar to watch it. Go to the movies instead or get a good book. Do anything but give these guys the ratings they think they will get for this fraud.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:33 pm
Apparently losing a big game now has no consequences and doesn’t matter anymore. Can we ask for a rematch of the SEC game?
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:34 pm
kerryb… your funny… but truely an embarrasement the UGA fan base. To carry on about 2007 is … well sad. Let it go bro. Hey you still have Helen Hunt coaching your team and that’s got to count for something right?
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:34 pm
we didnt beg the coaches that make way more than you do put us in
BC$ Slave
December 4th, 2011
11:35 pm
We can’t know who will win head to head games unless they play.
As Chris Berman has famously quipped, “That’s why they play the games.”
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:35 pm
kerryb… rematch of the SEC? LOL u don’t want that.
Unger
December 4th, 2011
11:35 pm
What irritates me is we have what 6 weeks before the game? Christ just have bama and ok st play in 2 weeks to determine which goes. This sport is insane.
Joseph
December 4th, 2011
11:35 pm
Welllllllll Bama may have a great record in the Superdome, but I don’t think they have ever played LSU in our Superdome either in the regular season or the Sugar Bowl. Also, this is the first time in the history of the BCS and maybe since Yale/Harvard in the 1890s that teams with the same league/conference affiliation will play for a National Championship.To some it may be an intriguing match up, however UA better thickin’ their hides regarding questions of legitimacy if they win or lose.
More importantly, I believe that it diminishes the stellar season which the Tigers have had being asked to play a team that played a subpar schedule and failed to even win their division in their own conference. With that being said, I hope that my team can even summon up the enthusiasm required to get on the bus to play an unworthy opponent. Again a big fat fail to the BCS. To all of my fellow football fans outside the SEC I am very sorry that you will be subjected to this total abortion of a game which is touted as being a National Championship….not a regional championship, we won ours on Saturday in the Georgia Dome.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:35 pm
Mike, they won’t get ratings anyway. 2/3’s of the country is going to care less about this game. It will probably be the lowest viewed title game in history. Some of the bowl games are going to probably have higher rankings. The Rose Bowl will probably have better ratings.
Realist
December 4th, 2011
11:36 pm
kerryb, you really want to relive that complete and total humiliation? Sure, ask. Play it 100 times. Only the margin of the blowout would change. LSU is in a different class than UGA. Only Alabama has hung with them.
Tech Forever
December 4th, 2011
11:36 pm
No worries…..the SEC backlash has already started with the Big 10 and the ACC and it’s only going to grow. Be careful what you wish for SEC……you want to be in a league of your own….you might just find yourself there faster than you realize.
Tate
December 4th, 2011
11:36 pm
Lsu is a 1 point fav. If it was ok state, the line would be -16
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:38 pm
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:35 pm
kerryb… rematch of the SEC? LOL u don’t want that.
_________________________________________—
We should get the shot if you are. I don’t believe Bama held them to no first downs and 12 yards in a half and Bama didn’t score 10 points on them. Won’t this time either with a one dimensional offense.
GT Guy
December 4th, 2011
11:38 pm
As an ACC fan, I am no great lover of the SEC but clearly it is by a hugh margin the best conference in the country. All of the whining about Oklahoma State being left our is just sour grapes. Each team had one loss. Bama lost in overtime to the only undefeated team ranked Number 1 by everybody. Oklahoma State lost to an unranked team also in overtime. Bama is the only team that even came close to beating LSU. 7 other ranked teams did not even come close. Oklahoma State edged out 6-6 Texas A&M by a single point. Bama deserves it, case closed.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:38 pm
The objective of the BCS is to pair the 2 best teams in the nation for the title game. Mission accomplished haters.
Does any moron on here actually believe that the team which ranked 107th in the nation defensively in yards allowed could hang with LSU toe to toe like Alabama? Uhhhhhh. That would be no.
Oh. One more thing. Please enlighten the NFL which has had Super Bowl rematches of teams that played in the regular season, which has had rematches in conferences championship games, and which has featured division rivals playing for a freaking 3rd time in the playoff, of just how freaking stupid a rematch is. Please let them know that any rematch of 2 teams that happened to have played earlier is a waste of time. Lemme know how that goes. And while you’re at it ask the NFL why divisional opponents play twice a year. Why do they have these dadgum rematches???
Tech Forever
December 4th, 2011
11:38 pm
Tate,
Good thing. Easy money for the 3-0 LSU win that’s coming down the pipe.
D man
December 4th, 2011
11:39 pm
I guess Vegas believes Bama will make field goals this time around since they are favored to win.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:40 pm
Kerry football is 4 quarters you dunce. Yay we beat them for a half. We should get half the sec title. Where do these idiots come from?
BUCK FAMA
December 4th, 2011
11:40 pm
Coach Bryant would have lost to LSU with class, but not l’ill nicky! Bryant would not have talked about a rematch. Nick said himself that if you don’t win your conference you shouldn’t play for a title! Why should LSU have to play Bama twice? ! Auburn was told, well you played the Citadel, but Bama plays a three year program in GA.Southern in 09 and no biggee. Not to mention they were on PROBATION then and now. They have been on probation since 95 plus repeat offender status until 2014!! BCS is a joke! The human perspective in this is even worse! Let someone else have a shot!
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:40 pm
Kerryb:
42-10 does not equal 9-6. Don’t try to pretend otherwise.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:40 pm
if you didnt see who the better team was the first time, you should be banned from watching football.
Big Television Money
December 4th, 2011
11:41 pm
We know that you’ll watch it, no matter what you say now.
Resistance is futile.
Realist
December 4th, 2011
11:41 pm
kerryb, I know numbers are hard, but 42-10. 42-10. 42-10. I know you ‘won’ the first half, and that is so cute. Did they give you a little “First Half Winner” trophy, like the ones they give all the kids who play in little league? Cause God knows there is PLENTY of space in UGA’s trophy case.
Rob
December 4th, 2011
11:41 pm
Wah wah! Cry all you want Bama haters, it’s plain and simple: Alabama was obviously the better team during the first match-up. They should have taken down #1 undefeated LSU back on November 5th. The computers know it, the Harris voters (former players, coaches, administrators, and current and former media) know it, and the 59 head coaches at Division I FBS institutions know it. (Coaches Poll) So stop your damn whining!
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:41 pm
kerryb,
And I dont believe alabama allowed LSU to score a whopping 42 points either. And we didnt allow LSU to beat us by a 32 pt margin but rather by a 3 pt margin in overtime. Gawd them dawg fans is stupid.
Louisiana-Monroe_anyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:41 pm
i already saw this game. lsu won 9-6!
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:41 pm
Bama had their chance.
And lost.
My big question is if Bama wins game 2 and forces a Game 3 where will it be held ?
Shine
December 4th, 2011
11:42 pm
Ole Tide Rising will be whining for 3 outta 5 if Bama loses again.
Disgraceful, pathetic, shameful, unforgiving, rigged.
Dan
December 4th, 2011
11:42 pm
Bama isn’t favored.
Rob
December 4th, 2011
11:42 pm
That’s why we’re getting the rematch, plain and simple.
Shine
December 4th, 2011
11:43 pm
The computers have OSU at number 2.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:44 pm
kerryb… like most of the nation I turned off the LSU vs UGA curb stomping half way thru the 3rd quarter so enlighten me on the final score? While your at it… what bowl will the SEC eastern divison champions participate in this year? As always I will pull for all SEC schools… and yet I fully expect UGA to quit half way through the game as they did saturday.
DawgDad
December 4th, 2011
11:44 pm
The BCS and the media can call it whatever they want but they won’t sell me on this being a National Championship game. It makes no sense whatever to re-match Alabama in lieu of a top team from another conference. I’m a UGA fan, but a severe national backlash on the SEC and BCS would be well deserved.
ESPN has become a disease. Don’t even get me started on them.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:44 pm
if i was an lsu fan or player i would be begging for a rematch because in the back of their minds they have to be thinking are we really the best team? we moved the ball on their defense 1 time close enough to kick a field goal. the other time we turned the ball over, then they gave it to them on the 25 yard line. hmmmmm are we really that good?
GMAN
December 4th, 2011
11:44 pm
Bradley,
Didn’t have to play Georgia? Are you kidding me? Are you serious? The same mighty Georgia that just got there $#@%$ handed to them by LSU…the same LSU that was held to only 9 points by Bama. You embarass yourself when it comes to college football.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:44 pm
I’m going to laugh my behind off that night when I hear the final score and Bama gets beaten good this time. Come on here Bama fans and run your pie holes when you get beaten twice by them.. Now that’s going to be real embarrassing. LSU is better than they were when you played them the first time and you struggled with Georgia Southern. You are not in the same league with them this year like anyone else is. Face it, This is just their year. They are bigger and stronger and more experienced than EVERYBODY.
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:46 pm
i already saw this game. lsu won 9-6!
Unfortunately they are showing it again as if it wasn’t boring enough the first time.
Hopefully someone will actually score a touchdown this time.
I wont know because I wont be watching like everyone else.
Nobody is going to care about the game really.
simmadownnow
December 4th, 2011
11:46 pm
They could’ve put a stop to this in 2004 when Slive promoted a playoff system. Guess who said no? That’s right – everybody except the SEC and ACC. Now you’ll eat it and like it!
JT
December 4th, 2011
11:46 pm
Who did Oklahoma State lose to?(rhetorical question) I guess you just HAD to write something, that is what you get paid to do. Bottom line: no matter how you slice it, the best two teams are playing for the championship.
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:47 pm
Tide Rising… you know the deal here. A bunch of lame half wits attempting to talk college football. Most of these people support Mark Richt… lol that says it all. BTW hearing good things about Winston and Yeldon’s visits this weekend. Roll Tide!!
UGADawg83
December 4th, 2011
11:48 pm
Does anyone really believe LSU and Bama aren’t the two best teams? This should be the game. However, it is kind of funny that what was unacceptable in 2007 is now acceptable.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:48 pm
I’m going to laugh my behind off that night when they beat you pretty good this time. Come on here and run your pie holes then. Losing twice to them in one year is going to be real embarrassing. They are better than they were the first time you played them and you struggled against Georgia Southern. This is just their year. They are faster, bigger, stronger, and more experienced than EVERYONE.
UGA>GT
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
Some really bad bowl games this year. How did Virginia Tech get a BCS game? Boise State gets 6-6 Arizona State in the Maaco Bowl? Baylor gets Washington? It seems there may be about 5 watchable games this bowl season.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
We should get the shot if you are. I don’t believe Bama held them to no first downs and 12 yards in a half and Bama didn’t score 10 points on them.- Kerryb
Kerryb,
So is it a 60 minute game or only 30??? And bravo for holding LSU to 2 first downs in the 1st half. And that has exactly what to do with the 32 pt asskicking final score?
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
well why are you on here crying about it? watch the 1980 season again.
Alexander
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
According to YOUR argument….non conference winning teams shouldn’t get a chance to play for the championship? Really? Funny how March Madness….MLB….NBA….NFL….and every other sport on the planet doesn’t have that requirement!
Quit crying. National Championship teams make #1 teams come from behind to get to OT. They don’t make 5-win chump opponents bowl eligible.
Or try to milk a tragedy for their own purposes.
Sam
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
Oh, bless your little butt hurt heart! If I were for a college team in Georgia I guess my feelings would be hurt also. Bama doesn’t care what you or anyone else thinks. The system is what it is. In 2008 the Big 12 had an opportunity to vote for a +1 system, as proposed by Mike Slive. Well, they turned down that proposal. The current system picked LSU and Bama, now you and the nation can just deal with it. I got a good idea, don’t watch it! Roll Tide!!
Big Dawg
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
Oversigning Bowl I…..E$PN now has complete control over college football, who plays who, when and where. If Bama wins, Saban will have two MNC’s and only 1 SEC Championship. Oversigning is now being forced on everyone that has any desire to keep up…but then integrity and the state of Alabama has never been used in the same sentence.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:49 pm
AJC blogs stink. Half the time your post doesn’t go through.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:50 pm
Alabama is in the title game for the 2nd time in 3 years. To the haters out there I say na na na na na na!
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:50 pm
Didn’t have to play Georgia? Are you kidding me?
Yes they didnt have to play Georgia. The team that has beaten Bama 3 of the last 4 times they have played.
Honestly UGA would have had a lot better shot at beating Bama. They aren’t nearly as good as LSU.
Who has Bama beaten ?
Georgia Southern ???
Rob
December 4th, 2011
11:50 pm
Yeah I meant AP, not the computers, and yes, I know it doesn’t count. The computers do have OSU at #2. Heck, even the poll that didn’t want to be apart of the BCS anymore because of disagreements, agrees with 2 out of the three components that led to Bama’s #2 ranking.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:51 pm
If GA fans don’t watch will they still play the game?
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:52 pm
u must still be in a BLACKOUT
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:52 pm
National Championship means nothing in College Football. Zero.
Its a beauty contest sort of like figure skating.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:52 pm
Yes they didnt have to play Georgia. The team that has beaten Bama 3 of the last 4 times they have played.- Reality
Aaaaah. The dawg fans loves that braggin about beating Mike Shula.
But why stop in talking about the last 4 games between Bama and UGA, 2 of which were played way back in 03 and 04? Lets just talk about the overall series of which Alabama leads by a double digit margin of 36-25.
36-25 na na na na na!
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:53 pm
It’s going to be funny watching Bama get beaten really good this time. It will be pretty embarrassing for Bama to lose to LSU twice in one year. They are bigger, faster, and more experienced than EVERYBODY. It’s just their year.
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:53 pm
Bama played 4 teams with a winning record all year.
Thats some impressive resume.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:53 pm
Reality,
And who has Georgia beaten???
Crickets chirping….
GTBob
December 4th, 2011
11:54 pm
Does anyone really believe LSU and Bama aren’t the two best teams?
I believe LSU is the best team in the country and has already proven they are better then Alabama. Im not sure anyone really knows how good Alabama is. They haven’t beaten a ranked team in over 2 months.
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:54 pm
I wish they wouldn’t take that Bama game off our schedule next year. It would have been nice to shut all of these inbred Bama fans up.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:54 pm
no we arent nearly as good. our defense is #1 in the country. they scored 6 tds on ga. we have gave up 9 all year. dumb dog.
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:55 pm
Aaaaah. The dawg fans loves that braggin about beating Mike Shula.
No it was Saban. And in Tuscaloosa.
Look it up.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:55 pm
not any of the good teams they played. 35-21, 45-42, and wait for it……………………………42-10.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:55 pm
Reality,
And how many teams with winning record teams has Georgia played?
Crickets chirping…..
Realist
December 4th, 2011
11:55 pm
Yeah Reality, UGA might have stayed within 31 of Alabama instead of the 32 point embarrassment that LSU handed you. What’s UGA’s record in the GA Dome this year again?
DP
December 4th, 2011
11:55 pm
Hey Dawg fans, put the TV on ESPNU. They’re showing the replay of LSU-Georgia. The second quarter is just starting, Georgia is ahead 10-0!
kerryb
December 4th, 2011
11:55 pm
Tide Rising, I believe during the Saban years Richt is 1-1 against Bama.
Rob
December 4th, 2011
11:56 pm
Bob: How exactly did they prove that again? I saw a game where Alabama outgained them, and left 9 points on the field in regulation. What game did you watch?
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:56 pm
And who has Georgia beaten???
And who has Bama beaten
I asked you first.
Crickets chirping louder ….
Realist
December 4th, 2011
11:56 pm
GTBob, Alabama beat Auburn last week. Ranked 25th in the BCS today.
puppies
December 4th, 2011
11:57 pm
good enough the #1 team in the country did NOT score a td on us. dam stupid
Billy Hatton
December 4th, 2011
11:57 pm
Mark
I wonder what you would have said if OSU had been selected instead of Alabama.
This was a lose lose for the BCS because of people like you.
Until we get a playoff system we will continue to have these type situations and even after we get the playoff system there will be people like you that will criticize that system.
I and millions of other people will watch this game no matter who plays in it because its the National Championship Game.
Just reading between the lines it sound like you are not a very nice person.
I wonder what your going to write about the H. T. winner if it’s not your selection ?????????
Blackoutanyone?
December 4th, 2011
11:57 pm
Tide Rising.. they beat… Kentucky.. Vandy.. UT.. UF.. Miss. schools and the barn… you know what never mind
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:58 pm
Reality,
So you beat Saban in his 1st year which is always a transition year? And the following year? You know. The blackout game???
So when exactly is the last time the dawgs won a national title. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Realist
December 4th, 2011
11:58 pm
And Reality, congrats on that big UGA win in Tuscaloosa 4 years ago. Won any games since then that mattered at all in the national championship picture? You know, like Alabama, LSU, Florida, and Auburn play seemingly every week in the SEC. Didn’t think so… hope you don’t embarrass the conference in your bowl game this year like you did against UCF.
Tide in Durango
December 4th, 2011
11:58 pm
MB – name ONE RANKED TEAM out of conference a BIG12 team beat. The answer is none. Face it – they look good beating up lower ranked Big12 teams but a Bama or LSU would shut down Okie offense. DONT FORGET WHILE YOUR MOANING AND BITCHING your UK BASKETBALL TEAM GETS FAVORABLE SEEDS IN BB TOURNEY.
FWIW – last time Bama played Georgia it was 31-0 at half. GAME SET MATCH. OVER.
Reality
December 4th, 2011
11:59 pm
Either way Alabama is a joke of a state.
I say let them win it.
Its like giving someone in Hell ice water.
They have to live in Alabama after its over. That makes they rest of us the real winners.
Sour Grapes
December 4th, 2011
11:59 pm
@Dp:
GA fans turn their DVRs off at that point cause, well, you know they beat LSU in the first half.
DP
December 4th, 2011
11:59 pm
Alabama’s best win is by 24 over Arkansas, the team that beat South Carolina by 17 to set up Georgia for an SEC championship game humiliation.
What’s Georgia’s best win this year? Maybe the last second win over Vandy, which Alabama shut out 34-0 the previous week?
Watching the SEC championship game replay, Crowell just limped off the field with menstrual cramps.
bama0805
December 4th, 2011
11:59 pm
If OSU would have taken care of business against a 6-6 team this would not be an issue, but they didn’t. Maybe the reason so many teams we played have bad records is because the BIG 3 of the west hammered all of them. OSU had their shot and choked.
Tide Rising
December 4th, 2011
11:59 pm
Blackout anyone,
Oh thats right. They avoided LSU, Bama, and Arkansas during the regular season. I’ll take the LSU game as a barometer of how the dawgs woulda fared against Bama and Ark. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:00 am
FWIW – last time Bama played Georgia it was 31-0 at half. GAME SET MATCH. OVER.
FWIW UGA has won 3 of the last 4.
How dorky is houndstooth too anyway ???
aladawg
December 5th, 2011
12:00 am
RTR22, eat sh– you moron
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:00 am
Tide Rising:
This is not about “hating” bama.
This is about what makes sense.
If defeating ranked opponents is the way you judge strength…OkSU beat more ranked opponents than UA.
OkSU has a legitimate argument for a chance to play in the MNC.
Are they better than Alabama? Only head to head play can determine that for sure.
You may not look better on paper, but if you win the game…you are the better team that day.
kerryb
December 5th, 2011
12:00 am
Bama fans who have you beaten? the only good team you played that we didnt play was Arkansas. We beat Auburn 45-7 You beat then what? 44-14? We beat Miss state by about the same score you did. We both lost to LSU. How are you better than us?
brad
December 5th, 2011
12:01 am
Reality, what a whining little p*ssy you are.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:02 am
Reality, thinking of the next post “Dang, my football team hasn’t won a national championship in 30 years, we got humiliated on national tv yesterday… I’ll mock the state next door to change the subject”. Well played sir, well played.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:02 am
@DP:
Well GA did beat LSU in the first half you know.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:02 am
Reality,
We beat a top 10 team in Ark whose only other loss is to LSU and we beat a 9-3 Penn State team which is also nationally ranked.
Once again who has Georgia beaten?????????????????????????????????????????????????????
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:02 am
“Watching the SEC championship game replay, Crowell just limped off the field with menstrual cramps”. lol Thank god he picked UGA. Well he’d be redshirting at Bama this year anyway.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:03 am
What’s Georgia’s best win this year?
Beating up Auburn alot worse than you guys did.
Either way Alabama is a joke of a state.
I say let them win it.
Its like giving someone in Hell ice water.
They have to live in Alabama after its over. That makes they rest of us the real winners.
Why should LSU have to beat Bama twice?
They already won that game. In Tuscaloosa.
kerryb
December 5th, 2011
12:03 am
Bama fans, who have you played? the only good team you played that we didn’t was Arkansas. We beat Auburn worse than you and beat Miss state by nearly the same score. You struggled against a lower division option team and we beat a #23 ranked option team and dominated them. You are not as good as you try to think you are.
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:05 am
BCS slave… after 12 games if you can’t tell Bama was a better team than OSU then you just don’t understand the game of football.
brad
December 5th, 2011
12:05 am
Reality, you’re a loser no matter where you live. Period.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:05 am
GA’s record this year is 10.5 and 2.5 because, well, you know they did beat LSU in the first half.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:05 am
9-3 Penn State team which is also nationally ranked.
Penn St is awful. Arkansas is also wildly overrated.
Enjoy the game Bama fans.
Nobody but you guys will be watching or even care.
Heck the way Bama claims National Titles they will probably claim one if they lose.
BCS Boycott
December 5th, 2011
12:06 am
Enjoy watching the BCS crapfest with those three chump QBs(assuming Lee gets some time) badly missing their SEC Speed WRs, and the special teams of Bama puking all over themselves.
The very scary thing, is that LSU is going to borrow the gameplan from Georgia Southern a couple of weeks ago against Alabama. Run that option left, option right, option gut, and beat that sad sack Bama team by 3 scores.
LSU 12
Bama 3
objective observer
December 5th, 2011
12:06 am
The BCS is a flawed system. That being said they did put the 2 best teams in the NCG. Alabama destroyed everybody they played by more than 2 TDs except for the LSU game. I have no dog in this fight, but LSU would destroy every team in the country except for Alabama in my honest opinion. We need a playoff.
JAP
December 5th, 2011
12:06 am
Rehashed topic and article Mr. Bradley.
Thanks for the press coverage though and enjoy watching Alabama play in the BCS championship game.
kerryb
December 5th, 2011
12:07 am
Bama fans, who have you beaten? The only good team you played that we didn’t was Arkansas. We beat Auburn worse than you. Beat Miss State by the same score. We both got beat by LSU. You struggled against a lower Division option team and we dominated the #23 ranked option team. You are not as good as you try to make yourself out to be.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:07 am
GA’s record this year is 10.5 and 2.5 because, well, you know they did beat LSU in the first half.
And bama’s record is 11.5 and .5
Because you know they were tied and only lost in overtime.
Beno Dawg
December 5th, 2011
12:07 am
Just stupid, LSU has to beat Bama twice to win the title, but Bama only has to win once.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:08 am
bcs slave,
Okay state has some legitimate points. However, does any rational person actually believe that a team ranked 107th in the nation defensively in yds allowed could hang with LSU? Seriously? And to add to that they struggled to barely beat a 6-6 Texas AM team by 1 freaking point. Bama did not have a close game the entire season other than an OT loss to LSU in which we missed 3 field goals in regulation and outgained LSU in total yardage.
The purpose of the bcs is to match up the 2 best teams in the nation. That mission has been accomplished. End of story.
And if someone doesnt like rematches than quit watching the NFL where rematches are played constantly and where teams may meet for a 3rd freaking time in the playoffs.
TheAntiMe
December 5th, 2011
12:08 am
College football – or more accurately, college presidents – have bastardized the college football championship all in the pursuit of dead presidents.
The BCS system is utter nonsense. If Alabama beats LSU then these teams will only have one loss each – to each other – but LSU will actually have a conference title and one more win than Alabama, but Alabama will somehow be crowned the champions. Sorry, but that’s horse doo-doo.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:08 am
So, Reality, margin of victory matters when UGA beats Auburn by 10 more points than Alabama did, but not when LSU humiliates UGA by 29 points more than they beat Bama. Seriously, 10-3 is a nice little season for a UGA fan… Alabama fires coaches after 10-2 seasons because it isn’t good enough.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:08 am
Thanks for the press coverage though and enjoy watching Alabama play in the BCS championship game.
Thats just it. Nobody will be watching.
JRock
December 5th, 2011
12:08 am
Roll Tide! The BCS got it right finally, and the 2 best teams are playing each other. Bama will be bringing home #14 very soon!
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:09 am
therefore making their record better than OK state, argument over. Team with better record playing in the NC game. Thanks.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:09 am
Beno Dawg,
Life just aint fair is it? Did your mamma never tell ya that?
Edvis
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
Steely Dan is my truth source, I was always a big fan of his songs, so thanks for the reference.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
The purpose of the bcs is to match up the 2 best teams in the nation. That mission has been accomplished.
Ummm no it wasnt.
Im sure if Bama loses though they will probably cry about the circumstances and demand they be given a rematch.
GeauxTigers
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
Hope you Dawg fans enjoyed the beat down yesterday. Bama would clean your clock by at least 3 touchdowns considering how bad we beat you. We will beat them again and get our 3rd NC in 8 years. Deal with it Dawgs!!
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
Black:
If you think you can know bama would beat OkSu simply by watching the games you don’t know the meaning of competition. You don’t know the history of the sport of football.
You don’t win games on paper. You win them on the field.
Until bama beats OkSu on the field…you are drinking the kookaide.
TheAntiMe
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
College football – or more accurately, college presidents – have molested the college football championship all in the pursuit of dead presidents.
The BCS system is utter nonsense. If Alabama beats LSU then these teams will only have one loss each – to each other – but LSU will actually have a conference title and one more win than Alabama, but Alabama will somehow be crowned the champions. Sorry, but that’s horse doo-doo.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
Reality,
You’re welcome to watch reruns of the kardashians or housewives of orange county while the nation’s 2 best teams duke it out.
So how do you lose by 32 points to someone?
marc g
December 5th, 2011
12:10 am
Man did they get this one wrong… what true college football fan wants to watch this game again? what good if any can this rematch do for the good of the progression of the game? How can 80% of the nation (as the poll on espn earlier on their website showed) want to see ok state vs lsu and alabama gets the nod?
The talking heads were able to convince… I for one am definitely boycotting this game!
Louisiana-Monroe_anyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:11 am
allow bama fans to crow all they want the next month…..the upcoming loss will only be that much more fun to watch!
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:11 am
I mean really. Who wants to watch that snoozefest again ???
Charles in NC
December 5th, 2011
12:11 am
I’d watch either way. Boohoo for “justice”. I don’t feel bad for teams that can’t beat ISU. They don’t deserve a title shot. Alabama lost to the obvious best team. While I can understand both sides of this, no one is clearly right.
Oh and here’s a big secret: there’s not going to be a playoff anytime soon. Why? Because big conferences aren’t going to be blocked from getting multiple teams in, and s,all conferences don’t want a top eight situation. So sad. If you want one uncontested champion, watch golf.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:12 am
So how do you lose by 32 points to someone?
I dunno. How do you lose to Louisiana Monroe ???
The ratings for this game are gonna shatter records for least viewers all time.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:13 am
LSU has to win one more game to be NC regardless of who that team might be. Unlike GA they don’t care who it is. I am sure they will be ready to play just as they have been for the first 13 games. They have an outstanding team.
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:13 am
Tide Rising… but UGA won their division and next year that banner will look great over Sanford Stadium. 2011 SEC Eastern Division Champions. In 20 years they’ll bring back the players to celebrate that accomplishment. Hopefully Helen Hunt will still be their coach.
marc g
December 5th, 2011
12:14 am
Bama fans believe they really deserve to be in this game? Hmmmmmm!
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:14 am
bcs slave,
If we played okay state I would have to say I like our chances. The no. 1 defense in the nation in all 4 major statistical categories against the pokes. Reminds me of when Oklahoma was averaging over 60 pts a game in the last 5 games going into the bcs title game against Florida and scored a whopping 14 pts.
And I have to like our chances against a defense ranked 107th in the nation in yards allowed. Lest you forget when we played LSU both teams were averaging 39 pts a game. We can score some points sir.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:14 am
So sad. If you want one uncontested champion, watch golf.
Or the NFL. Where they settle it on the field.
No wonder the NFL has much better ratings and popularity than CFB.
mark bradley knows nothing about football
December 5th, 2011
12:14 am
Mark simply put…if you dont think Alabama is clearly the 2nd best team in the country….you are an idiot
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:15 am
Blackoutanyone,
The dawgs did beat vandy and kentucky mind you. And they’ve had their problems with those 2 powerhouses in recent years.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:15 am
Why should LSU have to beat Alabama twice ?
Didn’t they already beat them. In Tuscaloosa ???
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:16 am
BCs slave…. Iowa State
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:16 am
Tide Rising:
You are just speculating.
There are too many variables during a game that determines the outcome.
Until bama and OkSU play each other…your opinion is just one of many on the subject.
Opinion doesn’t win games.
If you look at the prognostication record of the talking heads and coaches…you’ll understand that no on is perfect on guessing the outcome of games.
You included.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:16 am
Reality, I’m sure LSU or Alabama will proudly add a national championship trophy to their collection, regardless of the TV ratings. And if (giggle) UGA (hahahaha) ever (tehehehehe) wins another, I know your main concern will be TV viewership. Course, keep being pimp slapped by 32 points in your home state, and you don’t have to worry about National Championships like LSU and Alabama do…
GeauxTigers
December 5th, 2011
12:17 am
The SEC East stinks!! Maybe Mark can get you guys into Conference USA will all the realignment taking place. Speaking about not deserving something, there’s no way the Gamecocks shouldn’t had the chance to play LSU in the SEC CG. They destroyed the Bulldogs early in the season and would have been undefeated had Lattimore not gotten injured.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:17 am
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:14 am
“So sad. If you want one uncontested champion, watch golf.
Or the NFL. Where they settle it on the field.”
Reality,
Um. Yes. They do indeed settle it on the field. And in many cases games in the playoffs feature….. do I dare say it……. rematches of games that were already played in the regular season. Damn you are stupid.
Reality
December 5th, 2011
12:18 am
And they’ve had their problems with those 2 powerhouses in recent years.
Just like Bama has had problems with UGA in recent years.
Lost 3 of the last 4 times. Auburn has lost 5 of the last 6 to UGA.
Thats 8 of the last 10 for UGA against Alabama teams
UGA owns the state of Alabama.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:19 am
And if (giggle) UGA (hahahaha) ever (tehehehehe) wins another, I know your main concern will be TV viewership.- Realist.
UGA win another national title???
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAAH
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:19 am
Black:
So what? Bama got beat at home by a team you argue they will beat in the Superdome.
Shows what you know.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:20 am
Hey Reality, SEC teams that get spanked by Boise State in a virtual home game lose the ability to mention 5 year old defeats by other SEC teams. Have you watched any football since 2007? Cause you would have seen Florida, LSU, Alabama, Auburn, and LSU or Alabama win national championships. See, winning championships in the SEC isn’t that hard, unless you are a sad sack team like Vandy or UGA.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:20 am
Reality,
Well ma’am if we are going to live in the past then lets live in the complete past rather than picking particular points in time to suit our argument.
Overall head to head record
Alabama 36 wins
Georgia 25 wins
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAAHAHHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAH
Edvis
December 5th, 2011
12:21 am
It’s going turn out this way when subjectivity is involved. Even with a playoff there are easier draws and upsets. After yesterday I’m thinking LSU will render this moot — the Tide will be rising only like the water in my toilet bowl right before it flushes fully…
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:21 am
It’s been fun… got to get some sleep. Give em hell my fellow Bama fans…. ROLL TIDE!!!
thisguy
December 5th, 2011
12:21 am
best article you’ve ever written mark, nice job.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:22 am
Tide:
The NFL doesn’t have people with agendas deciding who plays whom.
They use won-loss records. A win is a win and a loss is a loss.
It doesn’t even compare to the BC$.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:22 am
Fine Reality, you own the state of Alabama, but the state of Alabama owns the last two national championships… seriously, come join us in 2011. You missed one heck of a first half by UGA yesterday.
DeaconBlues
December 5th, 2011
12:23 am
Reality, interesting the time frame you chose to look at the records. Can you tell the all time record between Bama and UGA? Didn’t think so because you know damn well the Tide owns your team. By the way we have 22 SEC Championships and 13 National Championships. Too bad, so sad!!
GTBob
December 5th, 2011
12:24 am
do I dare say it……. rematches of games that were already played in the regular season.
Rematches make alot more sense in a playoff system then they do in a system determined by popular vote.
Louisiana-Monroe_anyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:25 am
allow the bama fans to crow all they want for the next month….it’ll make that forthcoming “L” on 1-9-12 all the more entertaining to watch!
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:25 am
why does it have to be OK state, why not Stanford. They lost to a higher ranked team than OK state. Why is the same system that put one loss Ok State (lost to unranked Iowa State) ahead of one loss Stanford (loss to #5 Oregon) “fair” to OK state but it is not fair when it makes one loss ALA (only loss to unanimous #1) #2?
Explain to me the logic of having a team that loss to an unranked 6-6 team ahead of a team whose only loss was to the current #5 ranked team in the nation.
I can explain all of this: SOUR GRAPES
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:25 am
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:19 am
Black:
So what? Bama got beat at home by a team you argue they will beat in the Superdome.
Shows what you know.
BCS SLAVE,
First of all you cant predict what will happen in the 2nd game. You don’t know. And considering that we outyardaged LSU in the first game and missed 3 field goals in regulation and 4 overall to stipulate that we cant win a rematch is just plain…..well….. dumb.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:27 am
Sour grapes,
Uh oh. You gonna make their heads explode with that logic about why Stanford was left out. In the end you’re right. Its just sour grapes by the haters.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:27 am
Tide:
If Alabama plays OkSU you would like your “chances”?
That’s the point. A win is not guaranteed.
Champions win games. You can’t win them until you PLAY THEM.
Bama in Senoia
December 5th, 2011
12:28 am
Bama didn’t need a 1 point, come-from-behind win at a 6-6 Texas A&M. Bama didn’t lose to a 6-6 Iowa State team. Okie St was LUCKY to have their best team during a year when BOTH Texas and Oklahoma were WAAAAAAY DOWN!!!!! Okie States out of conference slate was equally bad. A BAD Arizona team, Louisiana Lafayette and Tulsa. The rest of their games were Big 12 games. I believe the bowl season will reveal how average the Big 12 is this year.
Bama, on the other hand, played VERY dominant football in every game. Even in the OT loss to LSU, Bama held the LSU offense without a TD for the entire game and one OT period. In the other 11 games, the CLOSEST game for Bama was @ Penn St….27-11.
Did you even SEE the interception call in the Bama-LSU game???? It was a call that COULD have gone either way…..and it certainly changed the game. The next week in Oregon, an identical play was called a TD for the receiver.
This Bama team was an eyelash away from being the team in the Georgia Dome this past weekend kicking UGA’s butt! And it would have CERTAINLY been the same type of game. UGA and South Carolina are LUCKY they didn’t have to play Bama this year!!!! Dawg fans just can’t accept it that they are STILL very mediocre.
The BCS, as it currently operates, is setup to match the two best teams in the country. The top two are Bama and LSU and it’s not even close. The best of the SEC East was a mismatch with LSU.
Bama and LSU for the National Championship.
UGA to Tampa…..please don’t embarrass the league against Mich St. Bama faced them last year in the Capital One Bowl….recall?
Donald
December 5th, 2011
12:28 am
Mark,
Nice of you to pont out that Bama didn’t play Georgia, or South Carolina. You failed to mention that Georgia didn’t play LSU, Bama, or Arkansas in the regular season.
Nice homerism
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:29 am
bcs slave… Bama missed 4 fg’s and had a questionable INT call at the LSU 1 yard line go against us. Add in the block in the back that negated the INT return to LSU’s 8 and too many men in the huddle plus Bama only punted twice in the whole game yet only scored 6 points. All that said the score was tied at 6 at the end of regulation. So yeah… I feel very confident with our chances in the rematch.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:29 am
GTBob,
Isn’t the regular season akin to a playoff system in that if you lose to unranked teams you get pushed down the ladder? Its imperfect obviously but wins and losses and quality of both wins and losses during the regular season do count sir. Do they not?
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:32 am
Tide:
So…now you are arguing you can’t know if bama will beat LSU in the rematch but would beat OkSU if they played?
Funny. It is always funny when people talk out of both sides of their mouth.
Kookaid drinker…I would never say bama can’t win. That is my point.
We can speculate all day long on which team can beat whom.
Until the play each other…we can’t know.
That’s why RANKING by poll voters and computers is nothing more than a farce.
Its why a so called “national championship” is meaningless.
Only a playoff…only COMPETITION should determine a champion.
The BC$ is a beauty contest.
big d dawg
December 5th, 2011
12:33 am
I’ve already told my friends I will not be watching on Jan 9th. He thinks I’m joking and will show for camaraderie. Not going to happen. I’ll be watching something else, anything else but….
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:33 am
@Bama in Senoia:
OK State sounds like the UGA of the Big 12, and we all saw how that worked out for GA (you know they beat LSU in the first half)
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:34 am
GTBob…. u guys got smoked by… UGA. Please leave the college football talk to the fans of legit teams… well never mind the UGA fans are here too.
Jimmy
December 5th, 2011
12:34 am
Bradley wants some attention.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:35 am
bcs slave,
You need not lecture us bama fans about championships. We have plenty of them sir. Both conference and national. Might want to check the record books.
Blackoutanyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:35 am
big d dawg.. you’ll be watching, just like the rest of these milkduds. Well it’s been fun. I’m out. Roll Tide!!!!!!!
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:39 am
Black:
Most of us don’t care if bama beats LSU or not.
I won’t even be watching the game.
We are not koolaide drinkers like you.
What most of us care about is going to a true playoff system.
Do you hear me…A TRUE PLAYOFF SYSTEM!!
If we had one this year…bama would not be playing for anything.
And we wouldn’t have their obnoxious fans here defending their “right” to play in the MNC.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:40 am
Sour grapes,
UGA did do well in the 1st half against LSU. Unfortunately for them its a 60 minute game.
UGA also won the 2nd half of the blackout game against Bama. So officially in the minds of dawg fans that day was a tie. Bama won the 1st half and uga won the 2nd half. Such is the logic of a dawg fan.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:40 am
Stanford got robbed, Stanford got robbed, Stanford got robbed. We need a congressional investigation of ESPN.
Mike
December 5th, 2011
12:42 am
System is flawed, but the best two teams are playing for the title. If you think otherwise, Bradley, then you too are flawed … There’s little doubt in this one. OK State? Are you kidding – not even close.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:43 am
If GA fans don’t watch the NC game will they still play it? If GA fans don’t watch the second half of the SEC Championship game do they get to pretend they are SEC champs?
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:44 am
So BC$ Slave, the number 2/3 team in the nation (Alabama) wouldn’t be in the playoffs? In what world?
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:44 am
“If we had one this year…bama would not be playing for anything.”
BCS slave.
Really sir? Bama wouldn’t be playing for anything? In every conceivable playoff scenario that I’ve seen regarding a college playoff system there is room for a minimum of 2 at large bids. Do you understand what a wild card is in the NFL sir?
Louisiana-Monroe_anyone?
December 5th, 2011
12:44 am
allow all the bama fans to crow for the next month…..that forthcoming “L” on 1-9-12 will be all the more entertaining to watch!
Peachtree TV
December 5th, 2011
12:46 am
Bama nor Saban had their offices sending out fliers to media all night Saturday and all day Sunday trying to tell voters to put them at #2 like Okie St did. T Boone was threatening investigations while at the same time throwing money at voters to switch their votes just like the Democrats do at every election. The Okie St game was a regular season game not a conference title game because the Big 12 doesn’t have 12 members (there’s a credibility hit to them right there, a league that can’t count, just like the Big Ten)…and oh, Okie St says Alabama had their shot and lost well Okie St was #2, and had their shot and lost to a 6-6 team that is and was unranked. They had their chance…just win…and they couldn’t. They beat a Texas A&M team that was 6-6 by one point. In 11 wins, the closest margin of victory for Bama was 16 points. And Ga. Southern? Looking pretty good for a FCS National Championship….they could beat most Big 12 teams and maybe half of the SEC. And Bama didn’t play Ga or SC? Georgia was brought down to earth hard (32 point loss) and THEY didn’t play any of the BCS 1 2 or 3 as was ranked a couple of weeks ago (LSU, Bama, Arkansas)….lucky scheduling? Instead of 10-2, they would’ve been 7-5 and Richt would be in the unemployment line today. Just look at Tennessee who got beaten up by all three and hardly had any players left at the end which nearly cost them against Vandy and did cost them against Kentucky. I’m all for a playoff system but the one in place worked because it was to get the two best teams and it did. Not Okie St with its moneybagging sugar daddy trying to buy a game or its 107th ranked defense and bragging about routing an Oklahoma team that lost AT HOME to a lousy 6-6 Texas Tech team. And don’t give us the “plane crash” excuse either. I’d be willing to bet not a single player on Okie State football and most coaches even knew who those two coaches were that tragically died in the crash. Most of those players and coaches have probably never attended a womens basketball game at Okie State either. Having worked in a college athletic program myself, I know for a fact that many coaches and players in many sports don’t know each other so I doubt that there was too much emotion among footballers over the tragic accident. Bradley, you’re just trying to stir a pot that is already empty. Your job is to sell papers and if it takes sensationalism and controversy (even if you have to invent it) to do that, so be it. You’re just Furman Bisher Jr. The AJC and Bisher always tried to bury Alabama football and Bisher is a hated man (and a poorer one for it after losing a lawsuit to Bryant for his article in the SE Post in the 60s). You’re simply trying to pick up where he left off.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:46 am
Bradley ate my post so will try again:
@Tide Rising:
If GA fans say they won’t watch the NS game, will it still be played?
If GA fans don’t re-play the second half of the SEC championship game can they pretend they are SEC champs?
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:47 am
Realist:
In a playoff system where conference champions advance to the national title game, you wouldn’t need rankings anymore.
In that world bama, who didn’t win their conference, would be OUT.
In that world where competition determines champions.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:47 am
Fascinating. BCS slave postulates that if we had a playoff system that Alabama, the no. 2 team in the nation, wouldn’t get in. Apparently in his ignorance bcs slave doesn’t understand the concept of at large bids that have been discussed in every playoff proposal and clearly doesn’t understand that in the nfl that teams that dont win their divisions get into the playoffs via the wildcard. Gawd some people are stupid.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:48 am
Bradley quit eating my posts.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:49 am
bcs slave,
Please let me know when Bradley or Schultz or some other writer writes a piece on a playoff system where at large bids arent accepted. And please have a discussion with the nfl about those bogus wild card teams that didnt win their division yet get into a playoff.
MarkH
December 5th, 2011
12:49 am
Mark I respect you ant the Ajc however you have not been watching the same football I have. Bama and have one thing in common besides being great teams. DEFENSE. Quite frankly both have NFL caliber defenses. They win chapionships. In a true playoff system indeed Bama and LSu would possibly meet again and play for all the marbles such as the NFL does. Secondly teams that win championships and the fan bases that surround them don’t storm the field after a big game and trample over other fans and tear down goal posts. The Univeristy of Ok State should take full responsibility of what happened after the game with OK. I really feel for the fans that were injured after the game and their families I believe the BCS got it right.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:49 am
and in the case of the Green Bay Packers win it all
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:50 am
What you assume, you slave to the status quo, is that a playoff system would incorporate the current BC$ rankings.
If only conference champions make the playoff, with conferences champions from like the MAC or other lower tier conference vying for a couple of at large berths…we wouldn’t need polls. Current rankings would OUT.
Get it?
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:52 am
“In that world bama, who didn’t win their conference, would be OUT.”
Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Every potential playoff system that has been postulated includes a provision for at large bids precisely because of the possibility of 2 of the best teams in the country playing in the same division or conference. You have no credibility sir and its becoming blatantly obvious that you are just another case of dawg fan sour grapes.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:52 am
Tide:
When you realize the difference between the NFL playoff system and the current BC$ beauty contest…we can talk.
Let me give you a hint: One is about wins and losses. The other is about voter opinion. Can you tell the difference in determining a champion from that?
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:53 am
What a stupid playoff system if it would keep a team like ALA out
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:53 am
So I take it BC$ Slave doesn’t enjoy the NCAA Basketball tournament, where teams who don’t win their conference win all the time, because competition determines champions. And Green Bay? Give back that Super Bowl trophy from last year… BC$ Slave says you didn’t win your division, and competition determines champions. BC$ Slave has gone from ideologue to idiot in one post. Well done. I don’t know any playoff proponent (and I’m one) who doesn’t want “wild cards or at large teams.
Alex
December 5th, 2011
12:55 am
The SEC is weak! OSU has defeated more top ten and more ranked opponents than Alabama because theres more of them in the big twelve to play. OSU got cheated, there needs to be a playoff. And OSU lost on the road, in OT after the loss of members of the OSU family in that plane crash that was learned about that same day.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
12:56 am
bcs slave,
Wrong again sir. If you had a playoff system you would still have a ranking system specifically to determine seedings- after all we need some voting to determine who is more worthy of a no. 1 seed vs being a 3 or 4 seed in years where there are several 1 loss teams. How else do you determine seeding between conference championships who dont play each other until the playoffs. Clearly you never thought this through did you genius???
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
12:57 am
Tide:
There is no reason for anyone to get into a playoff, even at large participants, unless they win a conference.
Get it. If only conference champions make the playoffs…then bama would be out.
I live in Alabama. It is pathetic how deluded you people can be.
And this argument is beyond team loyalty.
I enjoy watching my team play…I want them to win.
But that doesn’t mean I’m going to support the BC$.
I know what winning the MNC means.
It is a farce no matter who wins it.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
12:58 am
Alex, Alabama has beaten one top ten team (Arkansas, #6). Okie State has beaten one top ten team (Kansas State, #8) Alabama has beaten 3 ranked teams, Okie State 4. Pretty similar resumes. That’s why it was so close.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
12:59 am
sorta like the NCAA BBALL playoffs, each bracket is ranked 1-16 with 1 playing 16, 2 playing 15. Get it BCS slave. Heck they even have a wildcard play in game for the 16th seed.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
1:00 am
BC$ Slave, it wouldn’t have to be a ranking like the current system, it could be a selection committee, just like the NCAA Basketball tournament. Heck, just like I-AA tournament that is going on now (there were three teams from the Southern Conference this year).
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:00 am
Tide:
You keep telling me I’m wrong…but you don’t get it.
We would need a seeding committee…not rankings to determine who gets in.
The only “selection” that committee would do is for at large berths among lower tier conference champions. That would probably be 2 slots.
The rest of the brackets would be filled by automatic qualifying conference champions.
No RANKING necessary.
No POLLS necessary.
ESPN influence would be gone.
Bama would be out.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:01 am
Alex,
Really? How many top 10 opponents has Okay state beaten? An OU team playing without its starting tailback and the alltime leading receiver??? Bama beat Ark which is top 10.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:03 am
never happen then if teams like ALA will be excluded from the playoffs because only conference champions get to play. The A SHE SHE CHAMPION (as it is affectionately called here on these blogs) gets to play but ALA does not and that would be a legitimate way to crown a NC. The current system may be flawed but that kind of playoff system…please give me a break.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:04 am
Realist:
No need for a selection committee to determine the majority of the slots.
In football…we know who the big boy conferences are…the conference champs would get automatic entrance into the playoff. The “selection committee” would serve only to seed the teams…not determine who gets in (except for 2 at large berths who are also conference champions of lower tier conferences).
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:05 am
bcs slave,
So your mind is convinced that a “selection committe”, similar to an NCAA basketball selection committee, would leave out a Bama team as an at large bid in an 8 team or more playoff scenario? A Bama team that has lost one game all year in OT to the nation’s only unbeaten team. And your mind is convinced that this Bama team would be passed over for one of the 2 at large bids that would be awarded. You should just quit posting. You are sounding dumber with every post. Forget about rankings. Just look at record and body of work and tell me with a straight face that Bama would be left out as an at large in an 8 team or more playoff scenario?
Professor
December 5th, 2011
1:06 am
Mark,
Could not agree with you more! As if I wrote the piece.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
1:07 am
So, BC$ Slave, we would “seed”, not “rank”. Gee, that fixes everything! Thank goodness you have figured this out for us. And Northern Illinois would be in, but Alabama, Stanford, Boise State, Arkansas, South Carolina, and Kansas State would be out? Riveting tournament. I’m sure you and your fellow inmates at the asylum will enjoy it.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:07 am
the Clemson team that lost to Tech, NC State and SC goes but ALA would not. BCS slave many on here agree that a playoff would be the way to go but the way you are putting it forward just does not seem any better than what we have now
Professor
December 5th, 2011
1:08 am
Failed in the game at home! Now if they beat this team at a neutral site we are to believe they are the NCs?
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:09 am
bcs slave,
Sorry but in every scenario that I’ve seen the 2 at large bids would be reserved possibly for a non bcs team like a boise but also for special situtations where the 2nd or 3rd best team in the country clearly plays in the same divison or conference as the best team.If you dont think that an at large bid would be reserved for special situations such as Alabama this year or for no. 2 Michigan in say 2006 after losing to no. 1 Ohio State then you are just plain stupid.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:10 am
Sour Grapes:
You haven’t said what’s wrong with only conference champs getting into the playoffs.
Competition is what sports is all about.
Every team, including bama, would have their shot to win their conference.
It is so simple.
Win your conference and if you are one of the major competitive conferences…you get a shot to play for the national title.
You win…your in.
Simple…clean…fair.
The BC$ is about opinion, agendas, and money for ESPN and the schools.
That’s why we have it.
No other reason.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:12 am
does not matter what you believe. LSU or ALA will be National Champs. As in the days of old when there were split NCs in the polls, we can argue ad nausem until next season as to who is the best, unless of course LSU wins then the argument will have been settled with an unbeaten 14-0 LSU
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:12 am
So according to bcs slave 23rd ranked 3 loss West Virginia would be in a national playoff scenario as well as Clemson which has 3 losses I think but 1 loss Alabama whose only loss was to the only unbeaten team would be left out? Is this guy just dumb?
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:15 am
Simple…clean…fair.- bcs slave
But of course. It would be much more fair for a 3 loss 23rd ranked West Virginia or 3 loss Clemson to get into a national playoff over a 1 loss Alabama team that lost to the nations only unbeaten team.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:16 am
I would like to see the best teams play not just whoever happens to win their conference regardless of how weak it is.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:16 am
A playoff where only conference champs get in is the only fair way to determine a national champion.
Each team in a conference has a shot to win the conference to get in the playoffs.
Each conference champion has a shot to win the national championship.
Head to head competition determines who gets the chance to play.
Simple. Clean. Fair. Logical.
The BC$ is about agendas, opinions, and money for ESPN and the schools.
That’s why we have it.
No other reason.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:20 am
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:16 am
A playoff where only conference champs get in is the only fair way to determine a national champion.
Only conference champions get in? Tell that to the NCAA basketball selection committee. And tell it to Uconn which I believe won the whole shebang despite going only 8-8 in its conference. And tell that to NFL football and Major league baseball and NBA basketball all 3 of which where teams that dont win their conferences or even their divisions get into the playoffs.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:21 am
How can this be about money for ESPN. With all the complaining and threats that “I won’t watch” because of the re-match, you would think that ESPN would have pulled strings to keep ALA out of this game.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:22 am
You only get into a playoff if you win your conference or division? Tell that to John Elway who won his first super bowl with a team that couldnt even win its division. And tell that to any baseball or basketball team pro or college that won its championship without winning its division let alone its conference.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:25 am
Well I am in the Eastern time zone and got to get some shut eye, but I am sure this controversy will still be raging when I come back to blog some more, and for many months to come if ALA wins.
But so far no one has answered my question: Why OK State instead of Stanford?
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:26 am
Tide:
No…BC$ slave is not saying “23rd ranked 3 loss West Virginia” would be playing for anything.
He’s saying that ANY RANKED TEAM would be playing.
Rankings would be gone if we made it competition based.
You have a lot of faith in human ability to rank teams and be fair.
Invariably…their opinions are wrong…their guesses about who the better teams are miss the mark.
If that happens to your team…you’d be upset.
I think it happens far too often to a LOT of teams.
A playoff would mean a team controls it’s own destiny. Win and you are in. Period. Simple. Fair.
If you lose…you have no one to blame but yourself.
You don’t like the logic of this because bama would be out under this scenario. Bama couldn’t win when it mattered…at home. They didn’t win their conference. So if we had a playoff…it would be better luck next year.
But that is fair to EVERYONE.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:26 am
I wonder if the dawg fans would be happy with a playoff system with no at large bid possibilites. In particular I wonder if they would have been happy if the 2007 dawgs who ended the season ranked 3rd in the bcs would have been left out of an 07 playoff system cause they “didn’t win their conference”
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
1:28 am
One last question for Mark if he comes back tomorrow and reads these comments by all of us:
Why not Stanford instead of OK State?
AuburnGuy
December 5th, 2011
1:30 am
I’m a War Eagle all the way but the two best teams in the country are Alabama and LSU. No problem for me that they are going to play again for the national title. And for all of you Georgia haters out there who persist in believing that Auburn bought the championship last year when all, ALL, the evidence and the rulings say otherwise, you can carry your hate to your graves and it won’t change a thing. Cam rode a scooter around campus. I hear Hershel drove a gold TransAm. Hershel was a poor boy from Wrightsville so just how did that happen? I’ve seen that question asked before on these blogs and I have yet to see one of you Georgia homers explain that. Get over it.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:32 am
Tide:
You seem to think that all sports are equal and can use the same system
They can’t.
The NCAA basketball tournament is huge. Teams can play more than one game per week in basketball. The number of schools playing basketball exceeds those playing football.
You are comparing apples to oranges here.
As for the NFL…I am laughing at the ridiculous argument you are making.
They added a wild card entry into the playoffs BASED ON WON LOSS RECORD…not ranking by biased, money grubbing voters.
I’m sorry but your NFL argument hold no merit in the discussion.
Nor does a comparison between football and basketball.
Good grief.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 5th, 2011
1:33 am
I’m a man. I’m 40.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:35 am
A playoff would mean a team controls it’s own destiny. Win and you are in. Period. Simple. Fair.- bcs slave
Going by your logic then the NFL, NBA, MLB, and I suspect NHL would not have non division teams earning wild cards because “only conference champions” get to go. The problem with your logic is that you seem incapable of understanding that there are going to be years where the best 2 teams in the nation just happen to play in the same conference and sometimes even in the same division as in this year. And when the loser in the head to head in those years is that darn good these organizations that have the wisdom to understand that there has to be an at large provision or wild card to allow these teams to keep competing. They do this because of fluke wins or wins where one team may be the victim of a starting qb being out, bad breaks such as missed field goals, bad bounces of the ball, etc. This thinking factors in body of work for the entire season and this is what allows wild cards and at large bids. Your thinking is lacking and simpleton in nature. Thank God the NFL and other major sports understand that leaving a top tier team out just because they compete in the same division as the best team is ridiculous. You sir clearly do not understand that point.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:37 am
bcs slave,
Your idea of only conference champs is a simpleton idea. The wiser folks in all the major pro sports understand the various reasons why its important to have at large or wild card bids. This thinking is clearly beyond your simpleton scope.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:37 am
Tide:
I wonder if you’d support this BC$ system if bama was passed over and jobbed by the polls more often.
I doubt you would.
YOU CAN’T SEE what the rest of us see because the poll voters are biased.
They usually favor Penn State…don’t know why because they haven’t been relevant in a long time.
They favor Oklahoma…wouldn’t even let them fall out of the top ten after their losses.
They favor Ohio State…that argument has been proven through the years.
And the favor Bama especially…the history, tradition, etc.
I’m not taking anything away from these schools.
I’m saying a playoff would mean they’d ALWAYS have to earn a title shot through winning their conference and then beating other champions. Then we’d see who is best based on competition.
Would the best teams on paper always win? NO.
That’s why we play the games!
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:38 am
AuburnGuy,
Congrats on your bcs title. Too bad the dawgs are the only one of the big 6 sec programs that dont have one. Gawd they suck. 31 years and counting
Realist
December 5th, 2011
1:39 am
BC$, it still wouldn’t be fair because some conferences are easier to win than others. You acknowledge this when you say we all know the big boy conferences… we do? The ACC and Big East have been way down of late. Are they big boys? In your system, non conference games will not even matter. Go 0-4 in non conference, win your conference with a 5-3 record, and bingo, a team with a losing record plays for the national championship. But in your bizarre world, that is fair? It’s insane, and that’s why the NCAA moved away from in it in the mid 1970’s in basketball. Simple yes or no question… is the FCS (I-AA) tournament fair?
Dawgie Poo
December 5th, 2011
1:41 am
Mark you act as if Alabama would have played Georgia that would have been a feather in its cap. Reality is UGA was terrible and it showed against teams with winning records. Don’t badmouth Alabama when in fact South Carolina should have played LSU instead of UGA. UGA gave up over 350 yards to a so called “high school offense” and won. UGA not in the same class as Alabama or LSU.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:41 am
Tide:
Now you call me a simpleton?
You can’t win the argument with ideas so you try insults?
Nice.
You who can’t tell the difference between the NFL won/loss playoff system and the BC$ call me a simpleton?
Chalk one up for the quality of an Alabama education.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:42 am
bcs slave,
There is a reason why every single major pro sport here in the U.S. and college sports such as college basketball, baseball, etc. allow at large bids. If you cant understand the obvious reasons why then I just cant help you. The idea that only a conference champion goes is a simpleton idea and quite frankly all other of the sports I mentioned above validate this. Have a good night and when you get time try to understand the various reasons why all the major sports and the college sports allow at large bids and not just conference champions. And in an at large bid system Alabama would definitely have been in. And I suspect this is what bothers you more than anything.
13andcounting
December 5th, 2011
1:45 am
Oh well. All of you can sit back and watch ALABAMA in the National Championship. We can’t help if your team sucks. Georgia looked pathetic against LSU. Oh, Oklahoma State are scrubs with a qb thats old enough to be in his 6th or 7th year in the NFL. BOO HOO. Roll Tide!!!!
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:45 am
bcs slave,
If your mind cant understand why all pro sports and the major college sports such as basketball and baseball allow wild card or at large bids then I just cant help you sir. The idea that only conference champions go is just plain silly for various reasons. I suspect what is really bothering you is that you know that if we had a playoff system with say 6 conference champs and 2 at large bids you know that bama would get an at large. And that is what really bothers you.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:47 am
bcs slave,
The nfl playoff system features plenty of you guessed it- rematches. And guess what else. Plenty of non division winners get at large bids called wild cards. Thank you for making my point for me. You are now dismissed.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:49 am
Realist:
It doesn’t matter how easy a conference is to win.
If you have a true playoff…all conferences would improve if they want a chance play and win a NC.
The stronger teams in the smaller conferences would move to larger conferences and upgrade their teams.
As for determining the “big boys” there will some debate about that.
In an imperfect world…you have to choose where to fight your battles.
I think any system that uses opinion to crown a champ is far worse than head to head competition.
I’m not opposed to letting every conference champion have a slot in a playoff.
Shorten the regular season, play only in your conference and lengthen the playoffs.
Whatever…just let competition decide it over biased opinion and money grubbing.
Ian C. Hodson
December 5th, 2011
1:50 am
While everyone knows that a playoff system is a much better option, this article is a joke. Alabama lost by THREE points to the most dominant defense in recent memory. I also agree that watching Oklahoma State’s prolific offense against LSU’s vaunted defense might seem like a “sexier” matchup, it’s simple, Alabama missed 4 fieldgoals and in overtime to the top ranked team in the land!! We cannot punish the SEC for having the two best teams in the nation, even if they are in the same division and only one can the SEC West.
13andcounting
December 5th, 2011
1:50 am
Hey all of you Bama haters. It does not matter what you think or say. We made it to the Championship. If you wanna complain, go work for the AP or somewhere like that so you can vote for your weak teams!
Realist
December 5th, 2011
1:51 am
BC$, so is the current system in I-AA flawed? And if you honestly think the Big 10 or other “big boys” are just gonna welcome smaller teams in, you are truly delusional.
Ian C. Hodson
December 5th, 2011
1:54 am
With all that said, Tide Rising should do us all a favor and SHUT THE HELL UP REDNECK!!!!!! GGGGGGGGGOOOOOOOOOOOOO DDDDDAAAAWWWWGGGGSSSS, SSSSIIIIIIICCCCCCC EMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
1:57 am
Tide:
Not arguing against rematches. Never said anything was wrong with that.
Not saying there should be no “wild card” or “at large” berths. Never said anything was wrong with that.
What you can’t seem to comprehend is that in the NFL…those “wild card” slots are based on WON LOSS RECORDS. Will that work in college football? NO.
College uses biased, money grubbing voters to sort out which teams play for championships.
That system doesn’t work. Its been proven to get it wrong a lot.
Only conference champions…who have actually won something meaningful…should be allowed to compete for a NC.
What is sad is you think you make sense. Only a koolaid drinker sees the world as you do.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
1:57 am
“It doesn’t matter how easy a conference is to win.”
Oh. Really?
“If you have a true playoff…all conferences would improve if they want a chance play and win a NC.”
Is this a fact or just your opinion?
“The stronger teams in the smaller conferences would move to larger conferences and upgrade their teams.”
Oh, so now we are just talking about moving teams around all over the country every couple of years. So if the big east is weak then lets just plop Bama up into the big east for a few years till they get better overall. Sheer freaking insanity.
“Shorten the regular season, play only in your conference and lengthen the playoffs.”
Yeah. Sure. Shorten the football season. Nevermind that football and to a lesser degree basketball fund practically all other athletic programs. Sheesh. What planet do you live on? And if you take away that extra game for a lot of teams that wont make the playoffs you take away enormous amounts of badly needed money to fund other sports programs. Didnt think this one through did ya?
“Whatever…just let competition decide it over biased opinion and money grubbing.”
Just more opinion masquerading as fact.
13andcounting
December 5th, 2011
1:59 am
The Dawgs will NEVER win a National Title with Pretty Boy Richt there! Plus, you guys are always Underachievers! Georgia sucks. You are a bunch of cry babies. I bet you thought ya’ll had the game won at halftime the other night. Haha, you didn’t. And so much for moral victories, which you will probably call the Thumping LSU put on you! Ga sucks and Roll Tide!
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
2:02 am
Tide:
I am wondering…could your continued support of the BC$ have anything to do with your fear that Alabama can’t win it all in a playoff?
That must be it. You are afraid your team will be kept out of the national picture because they can’t win their conference.
With a playoff…all Bama…the greatest team that ever played the game…would have to do is win their conference. Something you koolaid drinkers argue they will do each and every year.
So what is the problem?
Won’t bama always win their conference?
Of course you know without the bias in college football polls, bama would be out of the discussion more often.
Sad. Pathetic.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:03 am
What you can’t seem to comprehend is that in the NFL…those “wild card” slots are based on WON LOSS RECORDS. Will that work in college football? NO.
Really. So in a college playoff system with at large bids Alabama’s 11 and 1 record, a WON LOSS RECORD, wouldnt work in college football the same way that those “wild card slots which are based on won loss records work in the NFL? And this wouldnt work in college football why???? Works everywhere else genius.
Do you actually read just how damn asinine your logic is? Gawd you are stupid. Im calling it a night. Cant argue with the insanely stupid all night long.
13andcounting
December 5th, 2011
2:05 am
Hey BC$ Slave. You are the pathetic one. What you think or say on here is not going to change anything. Did you know that? So turn off your TV when the Big Boys of college football come on and watch your weak team. Roll Tide!!!!!!!!!!
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:05 am
What you can’t seem to comprehend is that in the NFL…those “wild card” slots are based on WON LOSS RECORDS. Will that work in college football? NO.
Are you just stupid? So Bamas 11 and 1 WON LOSS record wouldnt work in a college system at large bid in the same way that a wild card slot based on WON LOSS works in the pros? Gawd that is dumb.Do you actually read the nonsense you write?
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:09 am
Oh lawdy,
BCS slave thinks that an 11 and 1 won loss record wouldnt work in college for an at large bid in the same way that wild cards in the pros work because they are determined by won loss records. You cant make this stuff up. He actually said that.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
2:09 am
Tide:
You convienently omit the one thing I said that matters: there will always be debate about the big boy conferences. As I said…no system is perfect. Most anything would be better than the BC$ and our MNC.
It is a fact…A FACT…if you want to play in the playoffs then your team must be good enough to win out. Seems to me improvment would be required under that scenario.
And I didn’t say that we should “shorten the football season.” I said if you want to expand the playoffs to allow every conference in…then you could shorten the REGULAR SEASON. The season would actually get longer if you have 10 to 12 team playoff. No money lost…money gained.
There is no argument you can make that I haven’t considered.
Your problem is you totally miss the point of my argument.
That’s what koolaid does to you.
You must be getting sleepy.
Realist
December 5th, 2011
2:11 am
Wow, BC$, you have now gone off the rails. Trust me, Bama fans think they can beat anyone, anywhere, anytime. They aren’t scared of BCS, the Bowl Alliance, or the old conference tie in method, cause they have won championships under all those. And they aren’t scared of a playoff, cause they know they will remain competitive in that system as well.
Your silly insistence on having no wild cards goes against every other team sport I can think of in the US. The NFL, NBA, MLB, MLS, NHL, etc., all have teams that don’t win their conference or division in the playoffs. And before you trot out the “but they do it on won/loss records”, well, not always. They have tie breakers! In MLB, it is a playoff. However, in the NFL there are rules set by the league office that take into account exactly the things you hate like “strength of schedule”! So, again, think outside the box. Take 6 conference champs, the two best teams outside of that, be they smaller conference champs (like TCU) or great teams who didn’t win their conference (like Stanford or Alabama). Stop making this harder than it needs to be.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
2:11 am
13:
I know you understand pathetic.
Why then are you here?
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:11 am
Ian Hodson,
Dawgs are irrelevant. Sit down and shut up you one national championship 31 years ago losers.
I am out. You just cant reason with these idiot dawg fans. On top of being losers there just plain damn stupid.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:15 am
bcs slave,
Your problem is that all of the major pro sports have a system that includes at large bids or wild cards based on won loss records- same as what I advocate. And so do the other major college sports such as b ball and baseball. You are the only person that doesnt believe in at large bids and clings to this nonsense about only conference champions going to a playoff. The reality is that all the major pro sports as well as the other major college sports vindicate my method of allowing for at large bids. None are on your side sir. You are just plain wrong. Deal with it and move on. Nighty night.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:17 am
bcs slave,
But of course. All the major sports and the other major college sports which all provide for wild cards or at large bids based on won loss records are all wrong. And of course you who advocates conference champions only in a playoff system are right.
I will no longer insult your intelligence by suggesting that your mind actually believes the nonsense you have been writing. Nighty night.
Tide Rising
December 5th, 2011
2:18 am
bcs slave,
But of course. The major pro sports and all the other major college sports which all account for at large bids are all wrong. And you who advocates for conference champions only in a playoff are right. Otay.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
2:19 am
Tide:
The NFL and college football are two very different animals.
How many teams have a won/loss record of 11-1 each year? Across how many conferences?
How many teams have a record of 10-2? How can your determine which of those many teams with the same records are worthy of being in the MNC?
In pro ball…won/loss records come first, then a series of tiebreakers determine the wild card.
Can that same system be implemented in college? No.
So we are left with the current BC$ system.
Right now…biased voters determine rankings which may or may not get you into the MNC. It is a subjective and often corrupted thing.
Are you really going to make the moronic argument that the NFL and college football can operate the same way?
That’s why I advocate conference champs going to a playoff to determine a champion. That is the only way we GET RID OF RANKINGS.
And you didn’t address my question. Are you afraid Alabama can’t cut winning the conference enough to play for a NC? Are you worried about giving up the advantage you have with voter bias?
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
2:23 am
Tide:
One last thing before I sign off for the night.
If this blog were the SEC championship…
I’d be winning the game 56-0.
I’ve enjoyed the discussion…at least until the name calling began.
Peace.
Sargent Carter
December 5th, 2011
2:24 am
Coaches poll, have some GUTS…let SEC winner LSU-Bama be one champ, Oklahoma State be the other, mail it in, where is the love, the BCS, not seeking the glory and guts forever, obviously not on the playing field, but obviously, the TV ratings and the unlimited dollars that has made college football a victim of tv networks and prostitution of the college presidents, who spin off their players and coaches and tell them to be chaste unto ventured slaves of the BCS plantations of America..can you really blame an athlete who sells his ring…..the comedy/trajedy continues…for every Mom who sees her son on an NFL Sunday, there are 1000’s who view their son’s otherwise…who really cares bout this game, aside from someone who doesn’t care bout those used up athletes?….coaches makin’ 4 million year?…they r saintly
Bud
December 5th, 2011
2:26 am
Alabama has no reason to apologize. In basketball, a sport in which the champion has in the past not won its conference, not won its conference tournament, but has won the NCAA championship, and all anyone says is congratulations. I know you will at least basketball has a playoff, the champion is determined on the court, but I say the two best teams are playing for the title, on the field no less, and thats the way it should be.
BC$ Slave
December 5th, 2011
2:29 am
Realist:
In answer to your question…if you can find a way to determine with certainty how to rank teams according to how good they are…then no…the FCS is not fair.
But humans or even computers can’t account for all the variables that make a team win or lose.
They can’t account for heart…for hard work…for attitude.
So given that…would a playoff with conference champs be fair…even if a 5-5 team got in? YES.
It’s the best we’d have to work with.
You can be sure…if that 5-5 team is as bad as their record…they’d be out soon enough.
Rob
December 5th, 2011
2:39 am
Awesome. Guess my post disappeared somewhere in cyberspace.
Rob
December 5th, 2011
3:04 am
Slave: I just have to toss my two cents in as another one who thinks you’re insane. Unfortunately, I’ve read the last few pages of your posts, and your playoff plans make no sense. That’s probably why not one single person has stepped in to support your ideas. At this point it sounds like you’re just grasping at straws. You somehow try to justify the crazy things you’ve written when questioned about the details, but at this point you just come across like a 7 year old on a school playground trying to make your argument for why Superman is better than Batman.
Anyway, I’m out for the night but I’ll be back later. In the meantime, can you answer some questions for me? If it’s obvious, as it was this year, that the best two teams in the land are from the same conference, even the same division, thus one is unable to even play for the conference title, how can you possibly keep that other team out of the playoffs? In some cases the best three-four teams in the nation might be from the same conference. How on earth would it be fair to allow only one of them in? Don’t bother spouting out stuff about conferences realigning, etc. as we know that isn’t going to happen.
Conference champions should be a small part of it, if at all. The NCAA Basketball selection tournament process would be the template to follow for the most part. Under your system, some conference champs would get in that would have no business even in the playoffs, while many NC caliber teams would go home just because they didn’t win their conference. Totally asinine.
Rob
December 5th, 2011
3:06 am
Well, I guess it just isn’t going to show up. Have no idea why though. It makes absolutely no sense. I’ve got some questions for you though BC$ Slave, if it’ll ever post. Be on the look out.
Mitch
December 5th, 2011
3:21 am
Still trying to figure out how ‘with every game matters’ it would be that much better if OSU played LSU. Why don’t we just go ahead and crown LSU champs?
And I’m sure Herbstreit has watched plenty of tape for OSU and Bama’s previous 11 games for his ‘eyeball’ test.
And I guarantee you if you ask any LSU fan who they would rather want to play, they would respond OSU because they know Bama is the 2nd best team in the nation and has the best chance to beat them.
Dennis
December 5th, 2011
4:20 am
with Saban and the SEC Commissioner voting in the polls, its no wonder Alabama got in the championship game. Since they barely got in, I wonder what happens if those 2 don’t vote.
Atlanta Gator
December 5th, 2011
4:25 am
Everyone is entitled to your own opinion, but you’re not entitled to your own facts.
There are eight components to the BCS ranking system: The USA Today Coaches Poll, the Harris Poll, and six separate computer ratings system. The two human polls count for two-thirds of the BCS combined ratings, the computers one third. Four of the six computer ratings rated Alabama third; two rated Alabama second (a reversal from last week). Both human polls ranked Alabama second and Oklahoma State third (same as last week), but the human voters did narrow the margin between Alabama and Oklahoma State in both polls—-it just wasn’t enough.
Here’s the bottom line: losing by three points in overtime to the No.1 team in the country has a more respectable air than losing to an unranked Iowa State that finished 3-6 in Big XII games. Close, but not close enough.
The outcome will not make Oklahoma State and Big XII fans happy, but it’s the system we’ve got. Does anyone really want to argue that Oklahoma State would beat Alabama in a neutral site game? Or that Oklahoma State would beat LSU? Or is this just about beating our hairy little chests and screaming “unfair!”
Ben
December 5th, 2011
5:04 am
Mark,
You forgot to add that Oklahoma State lost the day after the school lost a plane and two of its basketball coaches in a crash. That really seemed to affect the team that day. ISU can be electrifying and dangerous. No, I won’t be watching and am quitting watching football altogether.
Double"M"
December 5th, 2011
5:16 am
No matter what all the whiners say, the 2 best teams are playing in the National championship game. Until they get rid of the BCS, quit whining and realize that is how the BCS works. No one got screwed just the way they voted. Roll Tide Roll.
indigo
December 5th, 2011
5:51 am
I agree completely.
Too bad though there can not be a game between Okla State and Alabama to determine who gets to play LSU. Then 90% of the folks- not Stanford fans, of course, would be happy.
TechRon
December 5th, 2011
5:53 am
Right you are, Mark. The whole thing is criminal, Tammany Hall stuff.
Aubie
December 5th, 2011
5:59 am
I like turtles…
Preston
December 5th, 2011
6:04 am
If you think for one second that Oklahoma Satate deserves to be there instead of Alabama, you need to be fired as a serious sports writer. How stupid. They have NO defense and would be destroyed by LSU or Bama. They lost to Iowa State for crying out loud!
bamaguy
December 5th, 2011
6:04 am
Let’s remember three things: 1) The SEC put forward the plus-one scenario and the Big 12 rejected. The rationale was that it had the potential of putting multiple SEC teams in a championship series ($). 2) No one at the University of Alabama, save Saban’s vote in the Coaches Poll had any hand in determining this. Gene Chizik of Auburn also voted Alabama number two. And most importantly, LSU and Alabama are the two best teams in the country. They just happen to be in the same division of the same conference.
Mark Bradley!!
December 5th, 2011
6:04 am
BEST ARTICLE YET FOR THE ENTIRE FOOTBALL SEASON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
marko
December 5th, 2011
6:08 am
If the NFL settled it’s championship like the BCS does Green Bay wouldn’t be the reining super bowl champions. They were lucky to make the playoffs, but now , no one doubts that they’re the best team in the league. I firmly believe that LSU would make mince meat out of Stanford or Boise State, but then again we’ll never really know will we?
BobDawg
December 5th, 2011
6:10 am
MARK B. , Great Column as always and sounds good to hear: ” The Tide didin’t play either Georgia or South Carolina in the East” and as for the Ga Southern game…. come on! Really??? Really???
Maybe Roll Tide will only score 3 pts in this one???
bamaguy
December 5th, 2011
6:13 am
Alabama has had “brand” and “aura” since the 1960’s. Let’s not credit Saban for that. The only thing I get from reading this article is how intensely Mark Bradley dislikes the head football coach at Alabama.
BUCK FAMA
December 5th, 2011
6:15 am
I know its complicated for you KERRY B, but 9 is greater than 6!!! Cry baby……woulda coulda shoulda!!!! BUT,BUT,BUT….bama was better in the first half. Pathetic! How about telling Saban to offer a scholly for kickers. LSU’s kicking was better FIRST , SECOND, THIRD, and FOURTH quarter’s!!!! SO if you play bama and they are better in the first half, and your team beats them, they should get a rematch cause they did win the first half, SO…..bammer logic. ROLL DAMN TIDE!
Call this one the crybaby bowl! The better team the first time was THE WINNER.
Dawgfaninjackson
December 5th, 2011
6:18 am
Personally I think LSU and Bama are the two best teams in the country and had there been a playoff system in place I would not have objected to this game for the championship. However, under this current system this is a travesty. ESPN monopolizes college sports and they sway those human polls. They are hypocrites and I hope this Syracuse debacle will bring expose their hypocrisy.
So does that mean if Bama loses to LSU again they are still #2 in the final polls. I mean they only lost to the #1 team twice? Or does it have to be a blowout for Bama to drop?
It should have been an LSU and Okie Dokie State BCS game.
ESPN is a self serving media whore!
BTW I hope LSU stomps BAMA.
melo p
December 5th, 2011
6:19 am
bama gets what they want—it never changes. They’ve ruled the SEC for years and dictated the rules when Texas A&M and Missouri were added. They got to keep their two biggest rivals: auburn and Tennessee. Other teams got hosed.
who dat
December 5th, 2011
6:21 am
lsu beats alabama again–it will not be that close this time. Tigers 26 alabama 17—bet the house
Donna Outlaw-Plank
December 5th, 2011
6:23 am
LSU TIGERS played and beat 8 ranked teams, all except Bama by a significant amount. We’d love to show Oklahoma State what happens when they play an SEC team but you’d think teams in other conferences would see by now. Play in our conference – especially this year in the SEC West and other conferences wouldn’t have those 60+ scoring games anymore. But Saban, while coaching at LSU, said anyone who doesn’t win their conference should play for the national title. His words prior to the SEC Championship were very different. What makes it worse is now there will be NO SEC team in the Sugar Bowl because of the stupid rule that no more than two teams in a conference can go to a BCS Bowl. That’s BS.
BUCK FAMA
December 5th, 2011
6:25 am
Just to be fair, Georgia was the better team the first half of the SEC Championship! So let them replay next weekend just to be sure the right team really won……
Get Real
December 5th, 2011
6:31 am
It’s only college football. Keep it in perspective, folks. Who cares which teams play. Only ONE team can be ranked number two, somebody was going to be upset because they didn’t make it. This year, Alabama was ranked #2, so Oklahoma St is upset. If it had been the other way around, then Alabama would have been upset. It’s only a game. If you don’t like it then don’t watch it.
BUCK FAMA
December 5th, 2011
6:32 am
.I think what you are saying Melo P is, it’s all that pride class and dignity they have, or are entitled to!
bamaguy
December 5th, 2011
6:36 am
I read a brief comment somewhere that the reason Alabama nudged OSU in the Coaches Poll is that some coaches ranked OSU as low as fourth (behind Stanford I assume). Will be interesting if it can be determined if that is the case.
Top Dawg
December 5th, 2011
6:45 am
Playoffs NOW!!!
Judy Wilson
December 5th, 2011
6:47 am
Sour Grapes. Let the 2 best teams play which is Alabama and LSU. Georgia fans get over it. Its not Alabama’s fault that you are afraid to play them every year. How do you pick teams to play for the National title when SEC has the best teams. Alabama fans have been waiting for this rematch all season and New Orleans will reap the rewards in $$$$.
dawg tired
December 5th, 2011
6:49 am
Hey Bammers,
You still have the same kickers. Maybe they can miss 5 this time around.
bamaguy
December 5th, 2011
6:49 am
Top Dawg, I think everyone, outside the folks who make the cash off the current system, want that.
Time to go to work, maybe when I retire I can be a full-time fanatic. Roll TIde.
01HAWK
December 5th, 2011
6:58 am
melo p………………………bama gets what they want—it never changes. They’ve ruled the SEC for years and dictated the rules when Texas A&M and Missouri were added. They got to keep their two biggest rivals: auburn and Tennessee. Other teams got hosed.
YOU ARE SO RIGHT………………………….THANKS FOR REMINDING EVERYONE.
Why shouldn’t we…………………………………….BAMA and LSU started the SEC…………………..GOOGLE THAT ONE.
The Real Fan
December 5th, 2011
6:59 am
For the LAST time the game is for the two BEST teams in the country.
OKST lost to Iowa State!
ctown
December 5th, 2011
7:06 am
Way to go Bradley. Write (another) BS column to stir up the puppies in order to pile up comments to boost your ego. LSU and Bama are the best two teams. Period.
bamafan
December 5th, 2011
7:13 am
Give me a break! Bradley – you cannot compare 2011 Bama to 2007 UGA. UGA had two losses that year including a very ugly one to Tennessee. Also, everyone knew that when UGA was able to rise to #2 in the BCS the next to last week of the season that they would be overtaken and left at home. Instead of whining about UGA, maybe you ought to write a column celebrating the fact that the BCS has corrected the “mistake” it made in 2007. But you would rather that the BCS make the same “mistake” twice so you can feel better? When the first mention of rematch was made, no one believed it would happen for all the reasons we already know. However, if folks didn’t want a rematch they should have ensured that their teams won a few football games. While Bama may benefit from incredible luck, they also benefitted from a reputation and total body of work that was much more impressive than anything UGA has done, especially compared to UGA 2007.
kreedham
December 5th, 2011
7:14 am
Thought I caught a glimpse of a commercial that says NBC is launching an all sports network. Good bye ESPN….they’re so full of themselves and they only like NY and Boston.
Bradley Moronic as Usual
December 5th, 2011
7:15 am
Give me a break. Alabama was clearer the 2nd best team in the country hands down. Ok state beat an injury riddled Okl team (9 injuries) after a bye week at home and everybody suddenly thinks they are better then Bama and LSU. LSU had one of the most remarkable seasons in college football history and Alabama looks to be the exact same team minus a kicker. Stop playing politics Mark. You are an idiot and always will be.
dave
December 5th, 2011
7:17 am
Looks like I’ll be boycotting the BCS Championship game again. That makes 8 straight years. What a joke. Wake me up when we have a playoff. No one can say that 1 loss OK State, Stanford or Boise State are any less deserving than Alabama. And they didn’t get a chance to beat up on Georgia Southern either.
Buckeye
December 5th, 2011
7:18 am
Some 6-6 teams go the the Libery Bowl in the dark on a weeknight.
Others play in a premium News Years Day (plus 1) bowl.
Put’s your second tier program in perspective, eh dogs?
SEC! SEC! The Big 2 and the Least.
North Campus Trash
December 5th, 2011
7:19 am
Mark, when the day is done isn’t it the goal of the BCS to put the two best teams on the field? If that is the case, it is a simple decision; an unpopular one but a simple one.
kreedham
December 5th, 2011
7:20 am
The FCS system works. Ga Southern is in the Top 8 and plays a tough Maine team this coming Saturday at 2.
Excellent Article
December 5th, 2011
7:21 am
Mark,
Great article. Couldn’t have summed it up better. You used facts and examples of why this is a sham. Meanwhile, Bama and SEC homers are on here making idiots of themselves (gasp!).
scott
December 5th, 2011
7:21 am
i agree with Jeff nobody watch the game
Blizzle
December 5th, 2011
7:22 am
Nobody wanted to watch OSU get blasted by LSU in a National Championship game, what is OSU Defense ranked? They gave up lot of points this year, and the loss to Iowa State is much worse than a loss to LSU. Does anyone really think OSU would put 36 points on LSU as Gundy said they would?, Im sure thier fans do but that is naive optimisim at best. When it comes down to it the voters wanted to see a game between the two best teams. I think a 16 tean playoff is the way forward. Lets let them prove these arguments on the field!
Mike
December 5th, 2011
7:23 am
Mark, you could not be more wrong. There is absolutely no question who the best 2 teams in the nation are (and I’m no fan of either). The BL is that the BCS is doing EXACTLY what it was chartered to do…pit the two best teams against each other in a one-game playoff. I could care less who is 3rd , 4th, etc. I only care that the 2 best teams get to play for the title. A playoff will eventually come. And I predict it will severely diminish College Football. Look at all the discussion and interest that the BCS generates now. Mission accomplished.
okfornow
December 5th, 2011
7:23 am
That really sux – who really (besides Alabama fans) wants to see another boring game of LSU and AL. Of all the hype of the first go around – the first game was extremely boring. Besides – AL has already lost to LSU – why give them a second shot?
David
December 5th, 2011
7:26 am
Excellent article. BCS doesn’t work, ESPN plays politics, Nick Saban is evil. I agree with all three.
North Campus Trash
December 5th, 2011
7:26 am
When Alabama played UF, it was ranked in the top 10. Arkansas, the same. Penn State and AU were ranked in the top 25. Nobody complained about Bama’s strength of schedule at the time the games were played.
whatfor
December 5th, 2011
7:27 am
OKS really got screwed on this one. Who wants to see a repeat game – and especially from the SAME conference? Looks like the BCS went to where they thought they could make the most money – maybe they thought AL is a “better” money maker than OSU.
Buckeye
December 5th, 2011
7:28 am
Playoffs?!?!
Playoffs!?!?
Joe
December 5th, 2011
7:29 am
Herbstreit is a total JERK and Slime….when is the sport of college football going to stop leting a piece of crap like him and espn determine what is fair……I would love to see ESPN and all their idiots go crawl in a hole somewhere. Its time people in the BCS get a spine……what a bunch of crap…Saban and Bama are total losers……
phildo
December 5th, 2011
7:30 am
Being an elite program should have no effect on whether you play for the championship or not. UGA fans felt we were an elite program in 2007. Everyone knows you can not play for the championship if you don’t win your cnference first.
tech man for life
December 5th, 2011
7:31 am
these crooked bowl directors making 600K per year for one days work is the reason this system is not gonna go away easily
Sam
December 5th, 2011
7:32 am
Brand ? You mean like Ky.in basketball ? Grow up Mark.This is tackle football.Question – If Bama beats LSU,but loses to Vanderbilt,are we having this discussion? Thats what the Cowpokes did.Only thing is,Vandy would beat Iowa St.’s eyes shut.Dummy up people.The system works.Do we have a better brand……..well hell yeah.
David
December 5th, 2011
7:33 am
First time these two teams played it was a snoozer. I literally slept the whole second half. Nap time. Much as I hate to say it, Bama will win this time by 3. Georgia exposed LSU in the first half of the SEC.I can be objective, I hate them both.
David
December 5th, 2011
7:35 am
Bama and LSU that is.
Mike
December 5th, 2011
7:36 am
Only an idiot Ga fan would think winning your conference makes you the best or second best team in the country.
Haha
December 5th, 2011
7:37 am
Just glad 2 SEC teams are in there! Goes a long way in recruiting when these kids know they are the preferred conference.
What a bunch of crybaby loser posters
December 5th, 2011
7:37 am
ALABAMA would STEAM ROLL okie state. It would be over at halftime.
UGA = First half SEC champions.
WAIT ‘Til NEXT YEAR!
Honest Ingine
December 5th, 2011
7:38 am
Must be the MONEY……
MrDan
December 5th, 2011
7:38 am
ESPN has been bad for college football. But you had to see it coming. There’s waaaay too much money in NCAA FB today. Look how much bonus $$ Les Miles stands to make if he takes it all the way. And big time university AD’s, coaches and prez’s all see nothing but green and to hell with everything else. Determining a national championship today by whatever means (BCS, playoff, etc) is and will be secondary to how much money a school can pull in to augment an already inflated university operating budget. Saban knows this and knows this is why he was hired. The integrity of the college game disappeared years ago and that’s a shame for everyone. I’ll certainly agree with those who say boycott watching, but I bet very few will. .
juice sourcer
December 5th, 2011
7:39 am
College football sucks because of this whole system and how unfair it is and you laid it out perfectly Mark…and it’s not just the national championship game….how about this…Boise State ranked # 7 at 11-1 does not get a BCS game and is playing a 6-6 Arizona State team in the Maaco Las Vegas Bowl…are you kidding me…who the hell wants to see this game. Yet a 23th ranked West Virginia team goes to the orange bowl….and how about this one…Clemson who crushed Virginia Tech 2 times this year is ranked 4 spots below them in the final BCS ranking…really..what sense does that make…the whole system sucks.
Corky Thatcher > Richt
December 5th, 2011
7:39 am
Hahahaha. I wondered how long it would take one of you idiots to bring up Boise State. Get real!
georgiabound
December 5th, 2011
7:40 am
Mark-
You’re wrong on this one. OSU lost to Iowa State, a 30 point underdog. Bama lost to the number 1 team in the country by 3.
Atlantan
December 5th, 2011
7:41 am
You are one of the biggest sports whiners I know. What if this had been your precious UGA pups in this situation. YOu would have been all over it.
Oh and what would JAwjas record be if they had played BAMA, ARK, and LSU in the regular season?
That would have been 3 more losses for your precious JAwja.
One day you all may be lucky enough to sniff a championship when you go out and get a real coach instead of giving huge raises and extensions to a coach who keeps you being Mediocre team.
So just shut up.
Haha
December 5th, 2011
7:42 am
If Bama beats LSU by 3 in overtime does the BCS give both teams the NC?
twooten@gmail.com
December 5th, 2011
7:43 am
Exactly right. No way Alabama deserves another chance. They had theirs the first time, and whiffed. And they couldnt even win their conference division.
Add another one to the long list of “Hosed by the BCS” :
Oklahoma State
PB Jelly
December 5th, 2011
7:44 am
To all you Holy Bama fans – a great article from your very own Birmingham paper:
http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011/12/lsu_should_already_be_a_nation.html
“However, be mindful about gloating, Alabama fans. One month from now, you could be on the other end of a controversial vote if Alabama wins the mother of all rematches.
Alabama wins the BCS title. LSU wins the Associated Press title.”
That would be poetic justice.
Butch
December 5th, 2011
7:45 am
Two words for OSU….Iowa State.
The BCS got it right this year. I’m not a big fan, but they did get it right.
What you want to see in a national championship is the 2 best teams going head to head and that’s exactly what we are going to see.
mike shula
December 5th, 2011
7:46 am
It does not matter who the opponent is-the honey badger will take what he needs to get LSU the ring.
Bigdog
December 5th, 2011
7:46 am
LSU should be declared champ even if they lose to bam a.
….and I don.t even like LSU
reebok
December 5th, 2011
7:46 am
This will be the first BcS Championship game ever that I’m not going to bother to watch. I can’t believe how badly Okie State got hosed by ESPN and this so-called ’system.’
Hunter
December 5th, 2011
7:46 am
Mark, You’re just plain wrong. The BCS was invented to match the 2 best teams in the country in a bowl game, period. You don’t have to win your conference. Nor does it matter if you’ve already played the team earlier in the season. It just comes down to who the 2 best teams are. And there is simply no comparison between Oklahoma St losing to an unranked team that went 6-6 to an Alabama team that lost to the #1 team(LSU) by 3 points in OT.
KP
December 5th, 2011
7:48 am
College football is at a real crossroads. I’m a season ticket holder at a major university and am very disturbed at this nonsense. Probably tune out The BCS all together. Virginia Tech and the ACC do not deserve the extra BCS slot. Boise State should of gotten that nod. Sugar bowl is irrelevant! Four conference champions should be playing for BCS championship! I’m enjoying my daughters softball and soccer games more than this. Thanks NCAA and ESPN. You have done a lot of harm to the sport! Conference realignment is all on you too!
Atlantan
December 5th, 2011
7:50 am
And by the way, from the looks of your picture you are getting carried away with the Botox and I feel that it has somewhat affected your brain. May want to lay off of it for a while.
Houston
December 5th, 2011
7:50 am
We’re the real victims here!
Cyclone Fanatic
December 5th, 2011
7:50 am
Mark – couldn’t agree more. Even though my Clones threw a wrench in the BCS system, OSU should have their shot against #1, not a team that’s already had its shot. But, its all about TV ratings and TV markets, and so on. When will the football czars give the fans what they want – a play-off system!
drsoul
December 5th, 2011
7:51 am
Just another spitting of words on paper to get an article out….Bradley cannot stand Alabama…well known in closed circles…another ‘brand’ of article of pure crap..!!!! The real sportsman wants to see the very best two teams play in the big game…that is what we get..!!! Oklahoma State would only make the second half of the Georgia-LSU game look like a powder puff game for themselves…they could not stay on the field with either the Tigers or Tide for five minutes…. If you were more of an objective writer, you might make sense Bradley….but such a ‘WHINER’….you embarrass yourself …. and your profession… It is called ’sports’, Mr. Pantywaist…
wtf
December 5th, 2011
7:51 am
So if Oklahoma St is ranked #3, how did they get robbed?
Boise State
December 5th, 2011
7:51 am
No way Houston. We’re the original BCS victims. Get your own shtick.
Joey
December 5th, 2011
7:52 am
I read last week that Bama was ranked 27th in strength of schedule, while Ok State’s ranking was 12th.
Steve
December 5th, 2011
7:52 am
The only way to make sure you are in the BCS NC game is to win!!! OSU was sitting at #2 in the polls and they LOST!!! When you lose, you have no one to blame but yourself!
juice sourcer
December 5th, 2011
7:52 am
No your are the idiot “Corky Thatcher > Richt”
Stanford
December 5th, 2011
7:53 am
I still say we’re the best 1-loss team.
It ain’t fair!
AUDude
December 5th, 2011
7:54 am
“Bama played its two toughest conference games — LSU and Arkansas — at home. It didn’t play either Georgia or South Carolina, the best teams in the SEC East” – What a crock! As if this would somehow make a difference.
A lousy Auburn team played as well against LSU as did a surging Georgia team. A lousy Auburn team beat South Carolina. How did Georgia fare against South Carolina? Had Georgia played either LSU or Bama during the regular season, they wouldn’t have played in the SEC championship game.
Bammers deserve a rematch. With that said, Geaux Tigers and WDE!!
Play It
December 5th, 2011
7:54 am
I am so sick of voting, hypotheticals, BS, BS, BS. PLAY IT ON THE FIELD! Period. We need a playoff now!
These Bammers have it all wrong. Defending the current system is total BS. Sports is about PLAYING IT ON THE FIELD. The nations isn’t anti-Alabama. They are anti teams rewriting history by getting rematches. Georgia wants to play LSU – AGAIN! Wisconsin wants to play Michigan State – AGAIN! Oklahoma State wants to play Iowa State – AGAIN!
It’s unfair and uncalled for. A rematch in a playoff system is perfectly acceptable and well warranted. A rematch in a one game – winner take all when both teams have already played in the “Game of the Century” is unfair and un-American.
The BCS is a joke and a travesty – and Okie State is its latest victim. Put on your bikinis Alabama and enjoy your Beauty Pageant.
JP
December 5th, 2011
7:54 am
Ga didn’t expose anything. Lsu had something similar happen against ark. It’s called wearing down a team. Arky and Georgie can hang with lsu and bama for a qtr or two but eventually they get run blown out.
Bradley = jock sniffing, talking head
December 5th, 2011
7:55 am
Alabama loses to the #1 team by 3 points in overtime.
OK State loses to an un-ranked team who was a 28 point underdog.
OK State > Alabama
Makes perfect sense.
OKStateFan
December 5th, 2011
7:58 am
Alabama’s brand didn’t burn OK State. 6-6 Iowa State did.
Play Me Off!
December 5th, 2011
7:58 am
Any system that doesn’t make my team the champion just sucks. That’s all that really needs to be said about that!
T6Green
December 5th, 2011
7:58 am
Read Dan Wetzel’s Book…”Death to the BCS”.. It says it all. We need a playoff NOW!!!
Play It
December 5th, 2011
7:59 am
Dear Drsoul –
It’s actually not called Sports. Sports are played On the Field. It’s called “PR” — managing the media and the voters to get a replay of a game you lost.
You might have the second best team in the country. But Oklahoma State might also have the second best team in the country. We know how your team fared against LSU. We will never know how Oklahoma State would have fared. Because they only game they get to play is in STUPID BLOG POSTS LIKE THESE.
Bobby
December 5th, 2011
8:01 am
Our country is so morally bankrupt. If Alabama had any morals it would reject the game with LSU and go to the Fiesta Bowl. But we can’t expect such a Christian state as Alabama to do the right thing now, can we.
SEC
December 5th, 2011
8:02 am
SEC rules college football!! Remember that all you recruits who are being recruited by all these other minor league conferences. BCS will keep us in power as long as they stay in power!!
What a bunch of Mularkey
December 5th, 2011
8:02 am
Bama fans will be crying Crimson tears when LSU puts a Louisiana beat-down on the Tards. They don’t deserve to be there. Granted, LSU will beat anyone they play, but it’s OSU’s turn for that indignity, not the Crimson Tards.
ESPN and the BCS are ruining college football.
mrbiguns
December 5th, 2011
8:02 am
Read this fools!!!!
Oklamoma State WILL NOT beat Stanford!!! Your argument will be moot! Alabama missed 3 field goals and had two TD’s taken away in the game with LSU. Bama should have beat LSU by atleast 21 points and LSU is now considered the greatest college team of all time. I think Alabama deserves a shot at LSU and the reason you clowns are crying like babies is because you know Alabama will beat the GREATEST team in college football the second time around!
Sounds to me like Alabama should be playing for the title because they’re the best team in the country!
Gundy
December 5th, 2011
8:02 am
I’M A MAN!!!
I’m not gonna cry…
I’m not gonna cry…
Bill Deever
December 5th, 2011
8:03 am
I am always suprised that Bradley keeps his job. Once again, he is off the Mark. Alabama lost to the best (by far) team in the country whils OSU lost to an unranked opponent. OSU needed to take care of business and they could not. We want to see a game, not an SEC victory lap which is all OSU would have been able to provide. At least this year it is OSU that has the media crying instead of the tired Boise State” rallying cry we usually get this time opf year.
Bobby
December 5th, 2011
8:03 am
@wtf Oklahoma State got robbed because they should by rights be Number 2, and not Alabama.
o_0
December 5th, 2011
8:04 am
Will Bammers still claim they are the best team in the country when LSU beats them again?
CMR
December 5th, 2011
8:06 am
I don’t understand why we don’t get a rematch. We played a pretty good first half. It must be a conspiracy?
perk
December 5th, 2011
8:06 am
bill deever – did bama take care of business? I’m all SEC but bama didnt get to the conf championship – has NO right to play for NC – period. blatant hipocrisy
bubba4dawgs
December 5th, 2011
8:07 am
Raw deal for the Cowboys for sure! Well, it happened to Auburn back when Tubberville was there. I think it makes the football nation hate the SEC but they should simply hate the system. Remember, it’s all about money! I think it will be great if BAMA gets revenge and they just might do it! UGA’s defense on LSU the first half might prove they can be had. BAMA’s defense is better than UGA’s and LSI’s. Saban will be better ready this time and even as a UGA fan, GO BAMA!!
Hal
December 5th, 2011
8:11 am
LSU has done eveything that has been asked of it without the BCS. LSU is the 20011 National Champion. Now it will do what the BCS asks and play a meaninless game against someone has already beaten on their home field while another worthy team plays a usless game is some other bowl. The BCS sucks.
Southern Miss
December 5th, 2011
8:11 am
What about us? We just beat the last undefeated team out there. We should be going to the Big Game!
We’re Number One!!!
Jake
December 5th, 2011
8:11 am
Little Nicky was able to sit on top of all those phone books and plead his case during each of the three (?!) segments Gameday gave him on Saturday. ESPN has become a cartoon of itself.
BH
December 5th, 2011
8:11 am
Ok state should be ranked 2? Why? Because they lost to a a 6 loss team and bama lost to the #1 team? Nice logic.
Special K
December 5th, 2011
8:12 am
Sour grapes. Gotta love it.
Boise State
December 5th, 2011
8:14 am
We’ve got copyright to this BCS Whine©.
I can see a lawsuit coming against all these other pretenders. You guys better lawyer up.
Special K
December 5th, 2011
8:14 am
Christianity and football have nothing to do with each other. Get it.
Kirby Smart
December 5th, 2011
8:14 am
Be advised that Alabama was selected because of the aura that surrounds ME not Nick Saban. I am the greatest college football coach. I make all of the calls. Nick Saban is my puppet…a mere lap dog for my genius.
Matt
December 5th, 2011
8:15 am
If Bama wins are they going to share it since LSU won the first one? I don’t see how they could finish 1-1 against LSU and be the NC. I’ll be sitting this game out this year.
Rodster
December 5th, 2011
8:16 am
Good article. You betchya. It is all about brand. How else can Oklahoma continue to be ranked as high as they are year-in-year out? And sadly the brand is largely associated with the head coach, i.e. Stoops at OU, Saban, Miles, Meyer, etc.
Also I realize the bowls have contracts with conferences that obligate them to take teams from their constituent conferences, but Florida and Ohio State? Boy, will that game suck.
Kirby Smart
December 5th, 2011
8:17 am
When the Dawgs want a real winner, give me a call.
I am the greatest coach of all time.
Corn Dawg
December 5th, 2011
8:17 am
Who cares about the BCS anyway?
We won the first half of the CornDawg Bowl, and that’s good enough for me.
Matt
December 5th, 2011
8:17 am
BH- bottom line is that Bama was idle while the #3 team destroyed the #10 team (formerly the #1 team) and they didnn’t get jumped. It’s BS to everyone but a Bama fan.
dawg4u
December 5th, 2011
8:18 am
Let’s see now – Alabama lost to LSU and Ok St. lost to Iowa State so Ok St. should go to the BCS Championship because Alabama is all about aura and mystique and they have a mean old coach named Nick Saban. It just doesn’t make sense. I don’t even know Nick Saban and already don’t like him after reading this article. Your logic is flawed on this one MB.
JW
December 5th, 2011
8:18 am
1)no problem if OSU would had beaten a team it was favorited over! 2)maybe OSU should learn how to pay defense; they are like 130th in the country
Kirby Smart
December 5th, 2011
8:18 am
I am Alabama’s NAME BRAND.
I built Alabama and I will get a huge raise after we kick LSU.
Eat your heart out dawg fans.
Nick Saban
December 5th, 2011
8:19 am
I am merely Kirby’s puppet.
Somewhere in the Middle
December 5th, 2011
8:23 am
Everyone saying Alabama is clearly the better team is only speculating. The only ‘known’ is that LSU is a better team than Alabama. No one knows if Alabama or LSU are better than Oklahoma State. The LSU-Bama game should be called the ‘ESPN Bowl’.
Walker, Texas Ranger
December 5th, 2011
8:23 am
Mark, if there was a team that deserved to be in the final two other than Alabama, then I would agree but Ok State is not it. The objective of the BCS is to take the top 2 teams and that is exactly what they did. If Alabama and OSU were to play, who do you think Vegas would favor? It would be at least a 7 point spread, They got it right, they just didn’t get it right the year Georgia got snubbed because they were one of the top 2 teams that year.
J
December 5th, 2011
8:23 am
It comes down to this, OSU played in a weak confrence, Alabama and LSU Play in the Primere confrence, Everything says 1&2 play for the NC Well 1&2 are playing, OSU was close, If I remember Aubie was close a few years back and did not get the chance, OSU should have thought about Moving to the SEC instead of letting Missouri get their spot Then they coule play for the chance, Im just saying!
Haha
December 5th, 2011
8:24 am
Kirby Smart would flop as a head coach just like muschamp and Dooley are!
DawgFan (the original)
December 5th, 2011
8:24 am
I agree totally. I will not watch this crap, what if Bama wins. Do they play best 2 of 3? And what about Virginia Tech, the most overated piece of team in the US going to the Sugar Bowl. Beamer must have the same auora that Saban has cause there is no way they earned that bowl by getting blown out by Dabo’s crew….This is one of the most unfair BCS bowl assignments I can remember.
atlvol55
December 5th, 2011
8:26 am
It wasn’t just Alabama’s brand…it was the SEC brand. When you have won 5 in a row (7 overall) with a perfect 7-0 record and most of them blow outs…yes, Mark Bradley, you do get the benefit of the doubt.
LSU would be the living crap out of Ok St. That is why most of the voters deservingly put in Alabama. Mark, you don’t think UNC, Duke, KY get the benefit of “brand name” when it comes seeding time for the NCAA tournament and often times get Sweet 16 and Elite 8 sites that are so close they are practically home games??
Kirk Herbstreit is a hypocrite
December 5th, 2011
8:28 am
When Georgia was easily the logical BCS contender in 2006, Kirk (the Dogs kicked my ass in the ‘93 Citrus Bowl) Herbstreit claimed that a team that doesn’t play for and win its championship doesn’t deserve to play for the BCS title. Well, Kirk, what say you about Alabama… oh, they’re different, huh? LSU already beat Bama once, Okie State should get a shot. The BCS (Bogus College Series) is a joke and you, Herbstreit, have zero credibility as an analyst you hypocrite!
LakeDawg
December 5th, 2011
8:28 am
With no playoff system, its all an eyeball test. Tell me Mark, can you find ANYBODY who seriously thinks OSU is better than Bama? Didn’t think so. Having said that, I don’t think Bama deserves TWO chances at winning the national title.
Kirby Smart
December 5th, 2011
8:28 am
Someone please acknowledge my incredible coaching skills!
Title #14!!
December 5th, 2011
8:29 am
Bama’s rolling over lsu in the Super Dome—book it. That 9-6 loss was a fluke–bama missed a bunch of easy FGs. in the rematch, no FG’s will be necessary–Trent will be running wild!!! Honey badger? forget it—bama will shut him down cold. An angry Bama team will take what is theirs—title #14!!! Roll Tide Roll!!!
Woman in the throes
December 5th, 2011
8:29 am
BCS does suck but anyone advocating for Okie State is also using the “eyeball test”. Lots of one loss teams can claim they should be there except for one flukey loss and they pretty much all have a legit argument. Hey Mark, as an aside, you might want to check out Best Buy, I’ve heard they have these new fangled things called video recorders and Hebstreit could actually have seen that game:-)
ty ty football guru
December 5th, 2011
8:29 am
The SEC would be in the championship game if there were a play-off. The SEC is Superior.
G-Smoove
December 5th, 2011
8:30 am
I agree that there needs to be a playoff system!! But I also know what the rest of the country is afraid to say!! The SEC is far superior when it comes to college football! Look at who has won the National Championship the last 10 years! the only team that has a chance to beat LSU is Alabama!! I am a DAWG for life but I am not stupid enough to think that the 2 best teams in the country are these SEC teams! A playoff would be nice but I think it would really expose how dominant the SEC really is!!-GO DAWGS!!!!
atlvol55
December 5th, 2011
8:32 am
Wish I was a ticket broker….I can only guess as too how much tix’s for Alabama vs LSU in the Super Dome will be…I’m guessing those will be insane prices.
Chris
December 5th, 2011
8:32 am
At least an sec team will finally lose a bcs nat champ game. Haha
bigD
December 5th, 2011
8:32 am
The way I see it is if LSU(13-0) loses to Ala(11-1) that makes it LSU(13-1) 1and1 vs Ala and Ala (12-1) and 1and1 vs LSU. LSU should still win the championship with not only the better record but having won the conference title.
Jeff
December 5th, 2011
8:32 am
It kills me Mark that you started your article talking about Bama’s schedule, but in all the ewing and ahing about your beloved bulldogs, their schedule hasn’t been compared the same. They played the crap of the crap of the sec west and outside of the gamecocks the east is a joke. Now I know the mighty out of conference scheduling of New Mexico St. and Coastal Carolina adds strength to their schedule, yea right…..What ever. UGA won 10 straight against crap and got a reality check against a real football team. And now look at the even more pathetic schedule of 2012 where your doggies will get another reprieve by losing Bama off their schedule for Missouri. Lets just see if all the soft schedule comes up next year as you proclaim the mighty dawgs national powers after playing a joke of a schedule.
dinkdunk
December 5th, 2011
8:32 am
Somebody at the BCS musta been afraid that the Bammers would poison their trees if they didn’t get their way.
LakeDawg
December 5th, 2011
8:35 am
One of the things that bhas contributed to this country”s downhill slide is that everything is political now. Even sports. ESPN not only covers sports, but tries to influence it. This is part of their mission; therefore, their announcers are going to be political. Herbstreit is the worst kind of politician. He puts on a front of being apolitical, but has an agenda and revels in being powerful. I get sick every time I see him open his mouth with his bland “I have no agenda” face.
DIT
December 5th, 2011
8:35 am
I have nothing against the Bama football team. They are a very good football team. However, the whinning that Saban was doing Saturday morning made me want to vomit.
Sorry Tide, Bama does NOT belong in the Championship game. Bottom line. They are good enough to play in that game, but failed to accomplish the 1st priority that needs to be accomplished to participate and that is to win your League Championship. They did not.
Okie State got robbed plain and simple. It should be LSU and Okie ST. If Bama beats LSU are they really the National Champs? Needless to say the BCS needs to be revamped. Top 4 or 6 teams play a playoff to see who goes to the NC game.
AND, what’s the deal with no SEC team in the Sugar Bowl? I was under the impression that the SEC always plays in the Sugar Bowl? There should only be 1 ACC team playing in any of the BCS Bowls. This year proof’s that restructuring is a must.
Best of luck to everyone’s team this coming bowl season.
kt
December 5th, 2011
8:35 am
Mark,
Your way off base on this one. The two best teams a month ago werre LSU, and Bama. The two best teams today are LSU, and Bama. The two best teams on Jan 9th will be LSU, and Bama.
Bama can’t help that they just happen to be in the same division of the saem confernece as LSU.Alabama would simply smoke OSU.
There needs to be a playoff system, so all the whining will come to an end. settle it on the field.
You don’t have to be an Alabama, or an SEC fan to see that the two BEST teams in the country are playing each other on Jan 9th.
jdl2
December 5th, 2011
8:35 am
Hey morons. The BCS is the current structure agreed to by the schools and the NCAA to determine the national champion. The top two rated teams play for the national championship. Those, this year are LSU and Alabama. It’s not fair? Neither is the tax code. You want change? Do something about it, work for it, push it. But quit whining, PLEASE!
BG
December 5th, 2011
8:35 am
All you folks who don’t like the way the BCS is run, why don’t you go out and start your own system. Why do you think you have the right to complain about someone else’s sytem. If you don’t like the BCS system, it either ignore it or go create your own.
PS The only sad thing about this rematch is that two non-SEC teams will not get beat by SEC teams.
USMC2841
December 5th, 2011
8:38 am
Every game does count. Every game that LSU, Alabama, Okie State and Iowa State…wait Iowa State? Yes, Every game where Iowa State was handed their backside counts. Just like the one game that Okie State played in Ames against an unranked team where they were picked by 29 points and lost. The game that Alabama played against Arkansas, which unlike any OSU opponent finished in the top ten, and won by 24 points counted. Mike Slive offered a plus one alternative in 2008. The ACC was the only other conference to even consider it. Don’t blame the SEC all they do is play good football and win.
GT
December 5th, 2011
8:41 am
Winning your division is much overrated as Georgia has proven. Obviously in reality if you play cream puffs the BCS doesn’t let that slide like hot air. Not having to play anybody was Georgia’s ticket to the big show, not Alabama’s. It might have served the SEC better for a good show if Georgia had played someone and been eliminated. But this situation is better, the money is doubled for the conference, with two teams in the big show, plus the other teams in the conference play up a level in the bowl games bringing in a ton more money. Georgia shares that money just like they had gone themselves plus so does Vandy.
Ok State is a paid for team. If anything is absurd it should be that such an obvious T Boone operation goes undeterred in college football, while 300 dollars puts a hapless Ga. Tech on probation. Money to college football is like steroids to athletes. It is unethical and a cancer that eventually will destroy the game. The problem Georgia is having is you have thugs roaming that campus that can’t spell college. I am sure OK State has just as many if not more. There is something about a traditional team in a traditional conference getting the nod I like. You have the false security that you are looking at the real thing and not plastic surgery. I would have loved to have a bug on Pickens phone the night they lost to Iowa State. He must have felt cheated. And now he has been cheated twice, a buck just doesn’t spend like it use to.
WarEagle
December 5th, 2011
8:42 am
Yeah, but Mark isn’t this the same system that screwed and undeafeted Auburn team back 04 I believe it was? They are an SEC team that got screwed from the national title hunt by Oklahoma (which got blew out by USC) even though Auburn beat the number 2 defense in the nation in VaTech in their bowl game. They still got no love from the AP voters for a split national title. So to me, it seems like a little redemption. You can’t tell me Ok.State is on par with Bama or LSU or even Georgia on a good day for that matter. The fact is they lost to a subpar team. Home or away they were number 2 in the BCS, they were suppose to win that game and didn’t. If the argument is so strong, Arkansas should be more worthy of a BCS bowl game than VaTech, but they didnt’ get one. But at the end of the day, a playoff system is what is needed most. It works great at the FCS level. Then we can see how the chips fall. Any given Saturday!
Troof
December 5th, 2011
8:42 am
Mark, let’s talk about something of more importance than this BCS matchup: the fact UGA hasn’t played in a NC game in 30+ years! It’s not going to end anytime soon unless you man up and find a coach who can take you there. Richt isn’t that guy. Sorry Dawg fans but the days of actually being relevant on tha national stage aren’t coming back. Too many power programs in the SEC now. Sure, you made it to Atlanta against a bunch of creampuff teams and programs that are down. And yes, you survived a half against LSU before they decided to play. Shoulda, woulda, coulda. For the talent UGA supposedly brings in like the ‘Dream Team’ UGA should simply be reloading each year, not rebuilding. You’ll get a taste of how teams do this when you visit Tuscaloosa next year. Bama loses all kinds of talent, defense especially, but will be playing at a high level again next year.
30 YEARS AND COUNTING DAWG FANS! SABAN NOW HAS 2 BCS TITLE GAMES IN 3 YEARS! LSU LOOKING FOR TITLE #2 IN ITS LAST 5! WHERE IS UGA???? LOL!
RTR!
Doug
December 5th, 2011
8:43 am
It’s ironic the poeple bitching about ok state not getting in come from a conference where they didn’t want a playoff and the sec and acc did. If the big 12 commish had pushed with the sec and acc, then his okie state team would have a chance. Either way, they don’t deserve it cause they lost to a crap team.
GT
December 5th, 2011
8:43 am
This is a bonanza for the SEC. Double payday and every team climbs up a notch in the bowl picture. Thugs for pay works.
LucyDawg
December 5th, 2011
8:44 am
Mr. Bradley, You are an erudite wordsmith. Excellent use of the word ephemeral in a blog about football. Oh…and the BCS system really does suck.
Taylor
December 5th, 2011
8:44 am
Let me begin this by saying that I am a SEC fan and believe that without a doubt we have the best college football in the nation. However I do not believe that Alabama belongs in the MYHTICAL National Champion game. The Tide missed their chance when they lost to LSU. However there are certain schools (Alabama, Texas, Southern Cal, Ohio State, Penn State in the past and probably Notre Dame) that are showed favoritism in the media, ESPN and officiating. There is too much money involved and ESPN picks who they want in the game. It is all about money for ESPN and the SEC. Have you ever wondered why there is never a penalty called on Alabama? I love college football but I honestly believe there is a fix going on just to insure more revenue. ESPN had Nick Saban on Saturday just to campaign for Alabama. Saban stated about what a great game the first LSU -Alabama game was to watch. What is great about 5 field goals? OSU you got hosed this year but it is hard to compete with ESPN and all the money involved.
Go Gators!
Next
December 5th, 2011
8:44 am
Um war eagle, last time ga played ok state, ok state blew them out.
shadetree
December 5th, 2011
8:44 am
by your logic iowa state should be playing in the bcs championship since they beat oklahoma state
Whiskey Breath
December 5th, 2011
8:45 am
Mark, you rambel too much. You come across as a crying little girl. The best teams will be playing for the championship. I wish Alabama had some ” Cowboys : mystique. However, there is a lot of anti SEC sentiment because of the last 5 National Championships. The old Mark would not have written a sour grapes article. He has more important things to write about. Jeff helped you again didn’t he? Nick Saban is the root of all evil, isn’t he? The old Mark was above that crap.
DP
December 5th, 2011
8:45 am
Alabama beat Big 10 champion Michigan State 49-7 last year in the Capital One bowl. Let’s see how Georgia does against Big 10 runnerup Michigan State this year.
Kirby Smart
December 5th, 2011
8:46 am
I’m still the greatest coach of all time.
Bama will destroy LSU.
Justin Case
December 5th, 2011
8:46 am
Sorry mark but you got it wrong. The 2 best teams are meeting but a playoff system would be nice!
Skitty Fritty
December 5th, 2011
8:47 am
At least Auburn won their conference last year and went undeafeted.
Bama is a joke.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
8:47 am
I will pose the question again:
Why OK State instead of Stanford? Stanford lost to the current #5 ranked team for their only loss. If any body got robbed it is Stanford. I can understand ALA ahead of OK State, but how can OK State, who lost to an unranked 6-6 Iowa State team, be ahead of Stanford? Stanford has a potential Heisman Trophy QB, who many think will be the #1 draft pick in the NFL draft this coming year. If any body has a claim to the NC game other than ALA, then it seems that Stanford has the most legitimate argument of of these two teams.
So if Stanford played LSU we would have a potential NFL QB #1 playing against the NFL level defense of LSU.
Billy Bob
December 5th, 2011
8:48 am
OKS played zip out of conference, all their wins against ranked teams were against Big 12 teams with inflated rankings. Did any Big 12 team beat any ranked team from outside that no D conference? LSU set the standard by beating OR, and WV. AL beat Penn St and played LSU dead even.
The 3 best teams in the country all are SEC west teams. Winning the conference means squat on the national scale. You want to compete for a national champioship don’t lose to Iowa St. Talk about having your shot, beat a .500 team and win a weak conference. Too bad that powerhouse Houston lost, they could have made the same pitiful claim.
Senior Citizen Kane
December 5th, 2011
8:48 am
Of course the unstated presumption here is that some sort of playoff system would eliminate controversy. That’s nonsense. The NCAA basketball tournament has 65 (66?) teams and there’s still controversy.
Nick Saban
December 5th, 2011
8:48 am
Kirby Smart:
Get back in your office, I didn’t give you permission to blog. Remember, you are mine to do with as I will. You are not a grown man.
TG
December 5th, 2011
8:48 am
Everybody is belly aching about Oklahoma State not getting in the National Championship game. So what!!! They are going to a major bowl!!! Live with that and go undefeated next year and maybe they will be voted No. 1 and get to the national championship game. Oklahoma State is not the first team to not get the nod to play in this game and they won’t be the last. Suck it up Oklahoma State, fans and alumni and move on.
Will Muschamp
December 5th, 2011
8:49 am
As of this morning, I always wanted to be a Gator. This is why I walked on at UGA.
WarEagle
December 5th, 2011
8:49 am
Next…I don’t really care about Georgia to be honest. I was just making a point. And that game was in like 07…Ga was rebuilding that year…but I seriously doubt they would beat them now…
The Alpha Male
December 5th, 2011
8:51 am
Your haiku insults have no effect, Bradley…. Bama is regional champion.
Honestly, a team that lost to Texas Tech really has no business even being considered for a national title.
john
December 5th, 2011
8:51 am
Nice article Mark.
The Alpha Male
December 5th, 2011
8:53 am
Watching Auburn and Virginia play football? Geez. They should make the detainees at Guantanamo watch it in lieu of waterboarding.
Poobah
December 5th, 2011
8:53 am
Riddle me this, who would you bet your life savings on in a game between Oklahoma State and Alabama? Of course Alabama. Now how could anyone say that the BCS “whiffed” on the choice?
georgiabound
December 5th, 2011
8:55 am
Hey Okies-
Pass the Tostitos.
Chris
December 5th, 2011
8:55 am
Don’t agree. Okie State lost to a team that is barely bowl eligible.
Bama lost to the pretty much undisputed #1 team by 3 in over time.
THe Championship should be between the two best teams regardless of the past. The season is to identify those teams. Had Alabama been put in over an undefeated team or say Okie State lost in OT to someone like Oklahoma you might have an argument.
To give some semblance of point of view I am a rabid Auburn fan who grew up in Auburn. Nothing would make me happier than to see Bama denied the chance to play for the NC but the reality is I don’t think you can make a valid argument that LSU and Bama are NOT the two best teams in college football this year. And we played both…
Corn Dawg
December 5th, 2011
8:55 am
Dadgummit!
We already had to admit that LSU is better than us. Can’t we at least get to pretend that we’re better than Bama? It’s not like Bama made it to the CornDawg Bowl©, after all.
Fleischman in Chi Town's bed
December 5th, 2011
8:57 am
@Skitty Fritty
Alabama won their conference, the Heisman AND the national championship back in 2009.
AND they didn’t have to buy a QB like Auburn did (WAR CAM).
Enjoy the Peach Bowl barner.
ALL IN…… the peach bowl.
Craig
December 5th, 2011
9:01 am
Excellent article Mark. Totally agree with you on this. I also feel for the top ten teams who didn’t even get a BCS berth. You can’t tell me that Arkansas didn’t get screwed (even though I could care less about Petrino).
Chicago Bull's Fan
December 5th, 2011
9:01 am
Since moving here to Atlanta, I have really noticed the passion for college football. But sometimes it think the passion has been extremely misguided. The BcS is a joke and has always been since the beginning. But now, certain fans want to do away with the systems because their teams got screwed. Well, the BcS has been screwing smaller schools since day one but it was Ok. It started screwing bigger schools(Not Sec schools)it was ok, now that it’s screwing bigger SeC schools. The system needs to change. Well, it seems only college football fans would allow a systems like this exsist. Grow up like the rest of the world and get a playoff system. Every team that has won a BcS title really never earned it, it was bought and paid for before the season even began……………………..
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:02 am
Stanford was robbed (not OK State) should be the subject of this article
Corn Dawg
December 5th, 2011
9:04 am
Why can’t we come up with a system that let’s everybody win the National Championship?
It would be a great economic boost for the trophy manufacturers.
Steve
December 5th, 2011
9:04 am
Mark,
I believe you’re wrong on this one.
For years I’ve heard you WHINE about the BCS National Championship pairings. How it’s not really the 2 best teams getting to play one another.
So now, when the BCS seems to be trying to match #1 & #2 you’re going to WHINE about that too. Why am I not shocked.
The SEC has shown over the past 5 years, it is the dominant conference for college football. I’ve read enough sports articles this year to get the impression that most people (sports writers, broadcasters and individuals) feel LSU and Alabama are the 2 premiere teams in NCAA college football this year.
Since they both play in the same division of the same conference, logic dictates that when they met during the regular season, 1 team had to win and 1 team had to lose. That does not mean that the losing team is still not the 2nd best team in the country.
Alabama is the only team LSU has played this year to stop LSU from scoring in double digits. No other team LSU has played this year has stopped them from scoring a touchdown in the game. Only one other team (Mississippi State) has held LSU to under 35 points this year. That includes your beloved UGA Dawgs that gave up 42 second half points to them.
While Ala did not play GA this year, they did play 3 other eastern division SEC teams. They won those games by a total score of 109-16. You can certainly say UF, Vandy, & Tenn were not the cream of the crop in teh SEC east this year, but when the cream (ie UGA) gives up 42 2nd half points to a team that beat Ala by 3 point (in OT); maybe there wasn’t too much cream in the SEC east.
I, for one, would love to see LSU & Ala play in a rematch for the National Championship. The defensive struggle they had on 11/05/11 was awesome to watch.
Maybe when UGA Red gets to play UGA white for the BCS title you will finally say it’s a deserving matchup.
J
December 5th, 2011
9:04 am
we all know ESPN is biased … one reason i don’t watch their garbage anymore. For the record Mark, Ga Southern scored the most points against Bama than any team this year so don’t discredit them.
GEAUX may-retta
December 5th, 2011
9:04 am
As an LSU alum, I’m getting tired of hearing “Alabama missed 4 field goals”. And? Every single one of them was outside of 40 yards and should’ve been closer, had our defense not pushed them back. That being said, I expect another barn burner with LSU winning a close one. Good luck to all in their bowls. GEAUX TIGERS!
Joey
December 5th, 2011
9:06 am
The BcS has been robbing teams for years. What a joke! Congrats Lsu, and Go Dawgs!!!
Carlos
December 5th, 2011
9:06 am
It’s funny how every year we have the same discussion about the BCS. Many sit and make fun of the occupiers but at least they have the guts and courage to stand up for something they believe in. We know the system is flawed. We knew it a few years ago when Auburn went undefeated with Cadillac Williams and Ronnie Brown and was left out of the championship game. Sitting around and complaining isn’t going to change things. The players and coaches have to get to the point where they say I’m tired of getting screwed. What if the NFL was like this. Teams like the Arizona Cardinals the other year against Pittsburgh or the Packers of last year would never be able to have a chance at a championship. For most of these players a chance to play for a National Championship is all they will have, for most won’t make it to the pros. I don’t care if there is a rematch, the other year the giants played the Patriots in a rematch and we all remember how that turned out. These players who give every thing to the school, can’t work nor receive anything are the ones who hold the power. Everyone who wants a playoff and knows this system “sucks” should each give a certain amount of money and go and create a playoff system and then we can say we have a “fair” system and stop getting screwed eand and every year by a bunch of people who care more about how much each school received instead of giving the players the opportunity to decide on the field who is truly the better team.
jon
December 5th, 2011
9:07 am
LSU and Bama are the 2 best teams in the Nation. Some say they want a “more interesting matchup” based on stats on paper. However, I believe Bama and LSU deserve to play for the National Title. They are the two best teams in the nation. Please remember that when Bama lost to LSU in OT, there were a number of teams that would have eventually passed Bama in the BCS had they continued to win (OSU, Stanford, Boise State, Oregon, etc.). Each one of those teams lost to teams who were inferior than LSU. Bama lost to LSU, but had more success moving the ball on LSU’s defense. Some argue that OSU had better wins than Bama, but lets remember that OSU wins are against Big 12 teams, which score a lot of points but don’t play tough defense. The SEC is a tougher conference than the Big 12. The only bowl game with a SEC – Big 12 matchup is the Cotton Bowl. I expect Arkansas to demonstrate to Kansas State that the SEC is superior to the Big 12.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:07 am
Why would ESPN want a rematch if it is all about money when other than ALA fans most people don’t seem to want a rematch. There many comments on here about not watching the game so it would seem that if ESPN was in the driver’s seat they would want any team but ALA so the ratings (and therefore money) would be higher.
steve
December 5th, 2011
9:08 am
AND my home is in ALABAMA, 13 National championships, & auburn ain’t worth a damn.
Old_Skool
December 5th, 2011
9:09 am
I’m not a particularly a fan of either LSU or Alabama but I hope LSU hammers Bama and OK State thumps Stanford so the BCS honchos end up with egg on their faces
J
December 5th, 2011
9:10 am
one more question, why is there no coveragre of Ga Southern football for the playoffs? Pathetic …
GEAUX may-retta
December 5th, 2011
9:11 am
the fact of the matter is if you don’t win all of your games, you have nothing to complain about. Choke st, if you beat a .500 Iowa st team we’re not having this discussion. LSU did what we had to do to get in the title game. Whoever else is chosen is subjective. Win and your in. Simple. GEAUX TIGERS!
mike
December 5th, 2011
9:13 am
Bradley, your pitiful!
BS-PN
December 5th, 2011
9:14 am
ESPN is the biggest joke in sports. THANK YOU MARK!…..For finally standing up to ESPN. In another unrelated story (but still bashing ESPN)…they are bigots and don’t deserve to be licensed to broadcast after the Syracuse scandal. All I hear on ESPN was “Joe Paterno should have done more….should have done this…should have done that…. Yet when ESPN was presented with a tape and allegations that Fine did the same thing at Syracuse 10 years ago…they didn’t anything. NOTHING…yet ESPN bashed Paterno for not doing enough, but it’s OKAY FOR ESPN to turn their heads when presented the same situation. I’m neither at PSU or Syracuse fan, but this entire thing makes me sick to watch ESPN.
Bud
December 5th, 2011
9:15 am
Alabama will beat LSU!
Blackjack?
December 5th, 2011
9:15 am
Let’s see if LSU can score more than 21 points on Alabama in the title game. Only Georgia Southern, who plays in the playoffs of the FCS quarterfinals Saturday, reached 21 points against the Crimson Tide this season. My prediction 17-14 Bama.
DP
December 5th, 2011
9:15 am
“Why OK State instead of Stanford? Stanford lost to the current #5 ranked team for their only loss. If any body got robbed it is Stanford.”
Stanford lost by 23 at home to an Oregon team that scored in the last minute to lose to LSU by 13.
OK State was sitting at #2 and all they had to do to play in the BCS championship game was to win 2 games: on the road at a 4 loss Iowa State team they were favored to beat by 29, and after a bye week, a home game against an Oklahoma team that was without its best wide receiver and running back, that had lost at home to Texas Tech and would subsequently lose to Baylor, that gave up over 500 yards of offense 4 times this season (before OK State, which made it 5). OK State knew what it had to do and didn’t get the job done.
Could anybody who has watched Big 12 football this year point out some defensive players who are comparable to Mathieu, Claiborne, Reid, Montgomery, Mingo, Barron, Hightower, Upshaw, Kirkpatrick and Chapman? I sure haven’t seen them. I see QBs stand in the pocket for 4-5 seconds surveying the field and throwing to wide open receivers, handing off to running backs who go 10-15 yards up the middle before they’re even touched. The Big 12 looks like flag football compared with the SEC. Big 12 QB stats are like steroid era baseball home run numbers, so inflated that you’ve got to figure out how to adjust them down. Robert Griffin III had 3998 yards passing for Baylor, about 325 per game, and that was only 4th in that conference behind Weeden, Landry Jones and Seth Doege from Texas Tech. When Griffin was knocked out of the next to last Baylor game in the first half, the backup QB came in and Baylor still racked up 617 yards of total offense.
TallaDawg
December 5th, 2011
9:16 am
People PLEASE do not watch this game. That is the only way to reach E$PN (who controls the information and therefore controls college football).
Andy
December 5th, 2011
9:16 am
I want to ask one question, to all the people on here who are against the rematch. Be objective. Do any of you relaly think that Oklahoma State could beat Alabama? Because that is what it is about. Everyone knows what would happen in that game, at least a 17 point victory for Alabama. You all know it, but some of you do not have the guts to admit it!!!
Flash
December 5th, 2011
9:16 am
Shame on the BCS LSU wins again Okla was robbed PLAYOFFS PLEASE
VT
December 5th, 2011
9:16 am
The bigger joke is VT! How can you lose your conference championship by 30, and still make BCS game. Especially losing twice in the lowly ACC and to a weak Clemson team that lost to GT, NCSU, and SC by a country mile over the past 3 games. The BCS is embarrassing itself. Are you kidding me???
I-185
December 5th, 2011
9:17 am
They have a name for the winners in the world…….
CP
December 5th, 2011
9:17 am
Mr. Bradley and others immense hatred for the University of Alabama’s football program success is off the charts. The Crimson will play LSU for the national championship. Deal with it.
Shine
December 5th, 2011
9:17 am
Shameful, pathetic, biased, rigged. The computers, who dont have feminine feelings or ratings agendas, and calculate on logic alone picked OSU as #2.
The BCS will not come back from this farce.
scope
December 5th, 2011
9:17 am
So, so wrong. I’m a Tech fan and in general pretty middle of the road with regard to the conferences, and especially skeptical of all the talk of the SEC being the best. But year in and year out, they win top games against other competition. Let’s be real about the OKS schedule, would you take the B12 middle of the road teams against the SEC middle of the road teams? Would you take Iowa St over Vanderbilt? Maybe you would, but is it really that significant? I don’t think its significant at all. If you want to say OKS played a stronger schedule, OK, but not so much so that you can take their loss to Iowa St over AL’s loss to LSU – a game which clearly they showed to be as good if not better, save for mistakes made on the field and on the sidelines. And as for those mistakes, we all know that ain’t gonna happen again, not with Saban.
Its not like both conferences were stacked like they usually are. I really don’t think you can compare schedules – both teams did what they were supposed to do with teams they played except for one blemish. The computer polls must be counting for a road loss over the home loss and exaggerating the SOS more. OKS more deserving than Bama? – I don’t see it even being close.
Come on man!
December 5th, 2011
9:18 am
The TWO best teams!! AL will not be favored against LSU, but Ok St. would be a huge underdog. Just ask Vegas who the better team is b/t AL and Ok St.
thestogs
December 5th, 2011
9:18 am
Some sports columnists and commentators will spend the next month or so drinking, trying to rid their mouths of the nasty taste of an LSU-Alabama rematch in the BCS championship game. Oklahoma State coach Foster Brooks started early.
Brooks, also known as Mike Gundy, begged voters in consideration of his Cowboys after Saturday night’s win over faltering, limping and punchless Oklahoma. Brooks/Gundy said his team deserved a shot because of its record, then pandering to voters who understand real football, proclaimed his defense much improved — on par with Alabama and LSU. I believe he said that right after holstering his flask.
Granted, Okie State’s defensive effort against Oklahoma was its finest hour. But Oklahoma entered the game beatened, crippled and wounded, without its best receiver and running back. Even the mascot was heavily taped. In fact, the Oklahoma team buses used handicapped parking at the stadium.
Okie State narrowly missed its shot at a BCS championship game when it closed the gap by winning favor among those breathless over flag football. I still wonder about that improved defense. Let’s compare some figures to Alabama, the nation’s best defense in several, maybe all categories. OSU gives up 25.8 points per game – Alabama 8.8. OSU gives up 180 yards rushing per game – Alabama 74.9. OSU yields 265 yards passing per game – Alabama 116.3. OSU gives up 445 total yards per game (slightly smaller than Rhode Island) – Alabama 191.2. Thank goodness Okie State improved its defense or they might replace statisticians in the press box with surveyors in keeping track of the state’s great land rush. Oh yea, while Alabama’s defense leads the nation is nearly every category, Okie State ranks…well…only 13 college teams are softer than the Stillwater Cowboys. Pass the flask and duct tape.
Alabama gave up 106 points all season. OSU opponents surpassed that in four games in October.
Somebody wrap T. Boone Pickins head in duct tape before it explodes. Pickins threatened an all-out investigation if his favorite Cowboys weren’t selected for the BCS championship. Judges on aisle 9. Pickins has the clout and cash. He donated $400 million to Oklahoma State, $265 million of that to athletics. Carve out some for a panel of investigators, judges and a jury or two. And while he’s shopping, buy a defense.
Michael
December 5th, 2011
9:22 am
This BCS junk is great fodder for reporters, columnists, broadcasters but it sucks for the fans. When will the media, and you, Mr. Bradley, start putting the heat on the NCAA full time until they install a playoff system? It can’t be that difficult to formulate with all the brainpower of the media and the NCAA coming up with a viable plan.
rotomeister
December 5th, 2011
9:23 am
It’s simple. Oklahoma State lost to a team 6-6 team from Iowa. That 1 loss is the decisive factor Mark.
TOM
December 5th, 2011
9:24 am
ROLL TIDE!! U POOR JEALOUS WHINING bullpuppies who were spotted 10, then got SPANKED>as ALWAYS!!!!!! BUT, AT LEAST YOU HAVE A NICE COACH, WHO LIKES TO SING HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO RECRUITS>WUSSIES!!!!!!
Lindsey
December 5th, 2011
9:24 am
The cowboys got the bad end of the deal on this one. From a Dawg fan I think they did everything that ESPN has been saying for years, they won their conference. I will be cheering for LSU to beat Bama again, at least LSU earned the right to be there.
GT FAN
December 5th, 2011
9:27 am
Mark, LSU has already won the Ap vote. This game proved nothing. Split National Championship at worst for LSU.
This was the same system that told UGA no to the championship game in 2007 b/c it did not win its confrence. They played Hawaii and waxed them.
THis whole thing is a joke. Bowls pick teams that travel not teams that would be good match ups. Hince the Virgina Auburn game. But I guess Mr. Stoken Did not realize UV does not travel well.
I will not watch the title game. Espn has force fed us this bs about alabama all year and I am tired of it. OK State should be there.
Shine
December 5th, 2011
9:27 am
the crimson tide will now wear the whiner label for some time. i can see t shirts with elephants with pacifiers in their mouths….Univeristy of Alabama..we can win it all with a mulligan, or maybe three times the charm, or the gold for sure with number four, or we can take the jive give us a number 5, or…….
Gbal
December 5th, 2011
9:28 am
Dont have a problem that the current system has choosen LSU and Bama as the top two teams. I think they probably are the two best. A good case could be made for OSU as well though.
The problem I do have is the current system for determining the national champion in college football. As MB correctly points out the system allows for politics to incluence the voters. Namely ESPN.
There is just NO excuse for continuing with this system. All games thru the season and down the stretech would have had meaning. They would have determined the top eight teams to make a playoff and seeding. Yes, there would still be some controversary over seeding; the bubble teams 7 thru 10, and who would have gotten in and who stays home.
There is no doubt in anyones mind who #1 is at this point in the season – LSU .
There would be no doubt going into a 8 team playoff that the BCS 1 thru 8 would contain the #2 team in that field somewhere. No argument that we would crown a champion out of that top 8 that all would be satisfied with.
Thats 7 games that could be filled by current bowls on a rotating basis. Those 7 games would all have draw for TV; more draw in my opinion than the 7 will have under the current bowl format.
In my opinion, football season is over now for the majority of fans other than 2 games of interest. 1) Assuming their favorite is in a bowl, everyone with watch their own home team play.(UGA for me) 2) The NC game. Otherwise, the average fan has little to no interest in the other 28-30 bowls.
Id be tuning in for 6 other games if we were going into a playoff week and I guarantee you a lot more fans would too.
Gotta move on to a PLAYOFF!
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:28 am
What if Oregon had won out, were ranked #3 and OK State ranked #4? Would they be disqualified from the NC game also?
AFDawg
December 5th, 2011
9:29 am
MB, One of the best articles you ever wrote. The BCS sucks — OSU should file a lawsuit because somehow we have to get this f-up system fixed. Who on earth wants to watch a rematch? I certainly won’t watch the game — I could care less at this point who wins the “BCS NC”. I personally won’t watch the game and I’m a huge college football fan. If Georgia didn’t deserve to go in 2007 then Alabama didn’t deserve to go this year. I can’t stand that bunch of idiots at ESPN. Everyone start writing the AP — if Bama beats LSU and Okie State wins their bowl game big, let’s crown OSU AP NC.
TPD
December 5th, 2011
9:30 am
THANK YOU THANK YOU and THANK YOU!
TOM
December 5th, 2011
9:31 am
Ok, I also see that the bullpuppies and marky bradley’s comments look just like the SEC game the other nite. no bite, and no depth.
Loki
December 5th, 2011
9:32 am
Mark,
Installing a playoff system makes sense, but you would have nothing to write about this time of year, accept for the Falcons and Hawks (wait we have a b-Ball team in the ATL?) Be thankful for this easy topic – it keeps you employed.
Jason Head UA - 1983
December 5th, 2011
9:33 am
Mark, Alabama’s ‘brand’ has been built through over 100 years of collegiate football excellence. You’re just once again displaying your avarice toward ANYTHING from the state of Alabama. The Atlanta press has LONG enjoyed disparaging the state of Alabama any way it can. And yes, Mr. Atlanta Mealy-Mouth, EVERY GAME DOES COUNT! Just ask Iowa State.
Bama Fan#2
December 5th, 2011
9:33 am
To the haters of the crimson tide WHO CARES WHAT YOU THINK!! Any team that lost
to Iowa St has NO FREAKING BUSINESS playing for a NC!! Bama has a chance to
to play LSU and win NUMBER 14 NC’S RTR
fes
December 5th, 2011
9:34 am
eff the bcs and eff saban!
MS. Bully
December 5th, 2011
9:34 am
I hate Bama but Oklahoma State only has themselves to blame. You lost to Iowa State (a 30 pt. underdog)!! Just remember that the SEC West Rules College Football. This will be #6 in a row!!
Lance
December 5th, 2011
9:34 am
“Eyeball Tests” are good in strip clubs but not when determining football teams. And NO I could care less about Okie State or AL.
P Rose
December 5th, 2011
9:34 am
LSU and Alabama are the two best teams in the country by far. Alabama would have won that game if not for three missed field goals. They lost 9-6 in overtime; that’s practically a tie. LSU-Oklahoma State would have been a mismatch. LSU-Alabama will be a game.
Umaguma
December 5th, 2011
9:35 am
You hit the nail on the head, Mark. I’m a Sooners fan and even I know that Oklahoma State deserved a title shot more than Bama did. It’s all about money, Nick Saban and the SEC football “machine.” I hope LSU pounds them like they did the Athens pups…
Gbal
December 5th, 2011
9:35 am
AF – My opinion is UGA did deserve to go then and Bama deserves to go now. I think voters determining the best two is a joke.
Voters determining the best 8 would still have some room for agruing, no doubt. But I think we would all feel fomfortable that the best 3-5 teams would be in the field and they would then fight it out on the field in meaningful games.
Skeezix
December 5th, 2011
9:36 am
You are 100% on target Mark. This fiasco is another example of why we need a real playoff system. I don’t even watch these silly, meaningless bowl games.
GEAUX may-retta
December 5th, 2011
9:36 am
let choke st and dumbo play this Saturday at a neutral site, winner plays for all the marbles.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:37 am
I see all the UGA homers have locked on to the current “talking point” about OK State but none of you have any answers as to why OK State and not Stanford?
If the BCS having one loss OK State, who lost to a 30 point under dog ahead of Stanford who lost to the current #5 ranked team in the country, and that is fair, then shut up about ALA being ranked ahead of OK State.
Stanford got robbed, not OK State.
Paul in NH
December 5th, 2011
9:38 am
DP
December 5th, 2011
8:45 am
Alabama beat Big 10 champion Michigan State 49-7 last year in the Capital One bowl.
—
And there was me thinking that the Big 10 champion was contractually obliged to play in a BCS Bowl – usually the Rose Bowl.
RJT
December 5th, 2011
9:38 am
All OSU had to do was beat Iowa State..period, end of story. Don’t blame Alabama because OSU, Boise State, Stanford, Oregon and a host of other schools all lost games they were favored. If one of those schools wins one more game, Bama is not in the championship. This whole “Bama had it’s shot” is BS…OSU had it’s shot..beat a crappy Iowa State team and your in.
David
December 5th, 2011
9:39 am
Oklahoma St and the fans are being robbed. What happens if Alabama wins by 3 in overtime? If I’m LSU, I say we need a third game! I won’t even watch this tragedy, there should never be a repeat game fo rthe national title. Heck, there is no national title until there is a playoff. Gosh, I wish USC was allowed t play, no one would really want a piece of them right now.
Some cheese with your whine?
December 5th, 2011
9:40 am
C’mon folks, let’s not act surprised by this…like an LSU vs. ALA rematch for the NC wasn’t gonna happen. I saw it coming two weeks ago and that was based purely on the past antics of the BCS ‘voters’.
Yes, OK St got screwed…but it happens; it’s happened before to other teams and it will happen again next year to another school. big deal. i’ll watch the game, should be a pretty good one.
DS
December 5th, 2011
9:40 am
Because of the whole TV scheduling fiasco that is now ESPN with the bowls, and the fact that we throw in a couple of no name bowls between BCS bowls and afterward to extend well into January, I have decided to hell with watching any of the games. I will listen to Scott and Eric on the radio for the Georgia game, and watch absolutely nothing! The ESPN deal finally has confirmed in our faces what we all knew LONG LONG AGO, money drives college sports. It’s no longer about the game.
rollingtider
December 5th, 2011
9:41 am
Mark get the sand out of your uga v—-a. ROLL TIDE!
DIT
December 5th, 2011
9:41 am
I do believe that that Bama and LSU would whip the floor clean with Okie State. My issue is with the criteria that ESPN / BCS committee uses always seems to flip flop. If there was no BCS Committe then yes, Bama and LSU makes the most sense since they are the two best teams. I just can’t think that people out there think that Okie St., Stanford etc. could beat either team.
At saying that, back in 2007 UGA would have beat LSU, the eventual NC, in the SEC CG IF they wuld have played. As we all know UGA did not go to the CG and the guru’s at ESPN/BCS said “No, don’t win your conference CG you don’t belong in the NC.” Heck, I even agreed with that.
Let’s be honest, back in 07 the 2 best teams were UGA and So. Cal. Neither played for the NC.
Here we are today. Bama did not go to the SEC CG and now are playing for the NC. As stated in a previous post I posted, this is nothing against Bama. They are the 2nd best team in the country. However, the criteria that was explained that was set by ESPN/BCS committee back in 07 has made an about face.
I’m just saying stick with one set of rules and regualtions and go with it. Being an SEC fan the thought of two SEC teams in the NC does tug on a positive string for me. Realistically, Okie ST. or Stanford should be playing against LSU. Just my opinion and we all know what opinion’s are!
HJ
December 5th, 2011
9:42 am
Mark, no offense but editorials like this is the very reason why despise most sports journalists in the media because their primary objective is to sensationalize topics while ignoring the facts. The fact is that most experts and coaches (the people who actually played the game have relevant experience in it) will tell you that the 2 best teams in college football by far are playing in the BCS title game…so the BCS got it right. Whether you like the BCS system or not, it’s the best thing we have right now and it’s purpose has always been to rank the top teams…not predict who’s most deserving.
And the argument about a playoff system is moot in my opinion because real football fans absent of biasedness towards any particular school or conference want to see the BEST teams compete. Not subpar conference champions. And if a playoff system existed this year, it would likely have ended with LSU and Bama in the championshionship game so what would it have accomplished.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:43 am
And really do fans actually want to see another LSU blow out like we saw Saturday in the dome. They have already beaten Oregon and Arkansas in blow outs. Those teams are like Ok State, all scoring no defense. At least with ALA the outcome will be in doubt until the end of the game if both teams play up to their potential.
Bronc62
December 5th, 2011
9:43 am
Come on Bradley..you are losing your edge..BCS not great..but lets put Ok State in SEC or better yet Alabama schedule..and we would not be having this discussion…
t gregg
December 5th, 2011
9:44 am
screw you bradley
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:44 am
Enter your comments here
What a clown
December 5th, 2011
9:45 am
Bama man… Are you serious?
Alabama played a joke a schedule this year…
YOU PLAYED GEORGIA SOUTHERN, NORTH TEXAS, and KENT STATE… Wow what a gaunlet and lets recap your SEC sked…
Florida 6-6
Tennessee 5-7
Vandy 6-6
Ole Miss 2-10
MSST 6-6
Auburn 7-5
AND you got OWNED at home by LSU…
You are a clown bama man… Just like the BCS…
What a gauntlet you went through this year in the SEC…
Gbal
December 5th, 2011
9:45 am
If we were looking at 8 team playoff, who is pissed and crying right now?? SC at # 9!!!
How bout these games this weekend.
LSU-KAN
Bama-Boise
OSU-Arky
Stan-Oregon (Uh oh..rematch!)
Im loving football for the next 4-5 weeks.
3 SEC teams in! What a month! Oh well?
Nick Saban
December 5th, 2011
9:45 am
Whine Whine Whine….Get over it already !!!……………..WE’RE BAAAACKKKK !!
HJ
December 5th, 2011
9:47 am
Your argument is dumb. We’ve had several “repeats” of matchups from the regular season in the Super Bowl. I don’t hear people using that argument in talking about the NFL. Additionally, there’s been several NFL teams who didn’t win their division and went on to win the Super Bowl. Argument just doesn’t hold water!
secbama
December 5th, 2011
9:47 am
Big game Bob Stoops is the one that WHIFFED Saturday night. Should be fired on spot. Game was fixed. Counted 18 dropped passes by RB’s/WR’s/TE’s that were not contested by Okie State defenders PLUS the phantom try-to-pass-fumble by Landry Jones in 3rd qtr. Sorry Big 12…you STILL suck.
WhiteandGold
December 5th, 2011
9:47 am
If all of you feel this strongly about it, as I do…Just don’t watch it. If the ratings suck then maybe it will make a point to the BCS. It’s all money driven anyway… A Playoff makes much more sense, but if it means that the National Championship game consists of 2 teams that may not have as big of a fanbase and national interest then it will never happen.
Baddabing
December 5th, 2011
9:48 am
Bradley, you lost any respect I had for you as a sports writer with this one. Al this hocus pocus brand crap. You forgot to mention one thing, the biggest thing. It was OSU’s to lose. All they had to do was win out and they lost it to a team they should have beaten by three touchdowns. Had Alabama lost to Ole Miss in double overtime, they wouldn’t even have been in the conversation. OSU’s win over OU is the equivalent of AL beating FL this year. OU was awful as is FL.
Mark
December 5th, 2011
9:48 am
Finally, something I can agree with Bradley on. Bama in the NC game is total and utter BS and everyone BUT bama fans know it.
North over South
December 5th, 2011
9:48 am
It’s all about money how many fans will come and spend money
Dawgfact
December 5th, 2011
9:50 am
Excellent article! Maybe most accurate article ever on the AJC! Let the “Bama grad” and fans live in their ignorance and self absorption. If they do somehow win…they should put an * next to it. What a joke CFB has turned in to.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:50 am
If ALA wins then a plus one would be a huge draw if the two teams and one of the networks could work out a one game deal. Could be the most watched college sports event of all time.
But all this will be moot if LSU wins and is 14-0, the undisputed, unbeaten National Champs.
SammV
December 5th, 2011
9:50 am
To: Mark Bradley’s Article To Clarify a few facts: Ala.beat 3 Top 25 teams. OkSt only beat 4 Top 25 teams. (See Final BCS rankings.) Ala had 97 points scored on them all yr and ranked #1 in Defense. OkSt had 310 pts.scored on them and ranked #107th Defense. Ala lost to #1 team in overtime, who could not score a touchdown on them. OkSt lost to a 5-6 team in late Nov after winning 10 games. (Iowa St. ended up 6-6 with the win over OkSt.) Be fair! It’s OkSt fault for not winning late in the season. Finally, you must have “Coach’s envy” for dissing Saban, and I don’t blame you!!! (Do you really think that Georgia or South Carolina could beat Alabama????) Roll Tide!!!
Tom in Atl
December 5th, 2011
9:50 am
If all you have to do is past the “eyeball test” – then whose eyeballs gets to make that call? Apparently Kirk Herbstreit’s. OK State deserves a shot, they played a legit schedule from a legit conference – and what is possibly fair about LSU having to go beat Bama a second time. They already won the game in Tuscaloosa, now they have to go beat them a second time? I am a Dawg fan, and SEC disciple, but we all know that Bama gets to go because they are “Bama” – if their same resume and circumstances were attached to Arkansas or UGA – this would never happ
Hey Bradley
December 5th, 2011
9:52 am
You are an idiot Mark. Didn’t read the blog. OSU lost to a 29 point underdog and Bama lost to the #1 team. Any idiot, not flaming would see that.
allen981
December 5th, 2011
9:52 am
Lack of a true playoff for college football is simply indefensible. No other significant sport in the world uses such a level of subjective criteria to decide a champion. Nor they get so wrong so often.
Tell those fat cats running the Rose Bowl, the Orange Bowl, to take their hands out of the pockets of the student athlete and take a hike, and create a true 16-team, 6 week playoff during December and early January. They do it at Div. 3, Div. 2, and Div. 1AA…
The revenues would be far superior to the current bowl system; share w/charity, share with the student athletes, and let college football realize its full potential.
FedDawg
December 5th, 2011
9:52 am
regardless……the 2 best teams are playing for the NC and BOTH represent the SEC…..want to fix this thing then implement a playoff system (BET THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THIS HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP HUH)
» SEC: Ole Miss to name Freeze; Bama-LSU set for rematch John Clay's Sidelines
December 5th, 2011
9:52 am
[...] Alabama’s brand burned Oklahoma State, writes Mark Bradley of the AJC. [...]
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:53 am
The NFL Super Bowl winner, the wild card Packers. The MLB World Series Champs, the wild card Cardinals. The NCAA possible National Champs, the wild card Crimson Tide..
JM
December 5th, 2011
9:53 am
Georgia fans—-1980 was a long time ago eh? A little jealous are we? Face it, Georgia backed into the SEC title game without having to play LSU, BAMA, or Arkansas in the regular season. Talk about hypocrisy. And anyone who thinks that a team who lost to Iowa St Farm Tech JuCo has any business being ranked above the Tide is jealous, insane, or a Barner. I think the blackout still stings. lol
mike quinn
December 5th, 2011
9:53 am
POOR MARK. YOU HAVE BEEN ONE OF THE WORSE SPORTS WRITTERS THE JOURNAL HAVE EVER HAD. YOU ARE SO BIAS. CONFRENCE TITLES REALLY MEAN NOTHING. LOOK AT THE SEC AND WEST COAST OR BIG EAST. UCLA PLAYING FOR CHAMPIONSHIP WITH 6-6 RECORD. IS THAT FAIR NO. GA. PLAYING WITH THE FITH BEST RECORD IN SEC IS THAT FAIR NO. CHAMPIONSHIPS ARE SUPPOSE TO BE THE BEST 2 TEAMS IN THE CONFRENCE TO PLAY FOR CHAMPIONSHIP. BEST 2 TEAMS PLAY FOR NATIONAL TITLE NO MATTER WHAT. THAT IS HAPPENENING THIS YEAR. SO GET OVER ALL YOUR CRYING ABOUT OSU DESERVING TO GO. I HATE THE BCS MYSELF. OSU COULDN’T HOLD A 17 POINT LEAD AGAINST A MID LEVEL TEAM. SO I DON’T SEE WHY THET DESERVE ANYTHING. THE SEC IS THE BEST CONFRENCE IN THE NATION WEATHER YOU OR ANY OF THE OTHER COUNTRY LIKE IT OR NOT. SO GET OVER THAT TOO. ANY TEAM CAN SAY THEY DESERVE TO PLAY IN THE BCS EVEN IF THEY DIDN’T WIN A GAME. SO ALL YOU CRY BABIES NEED TO LEARN ACCEPTANCE AND STOP WHINNING
BG
December 5th, 2011
9:54 am
The best reason for the voters having chosen a rematch is that they’re tired of seeing LSU beat opponents like a drum — and Bama is the only team that can beat ‘em.
John
December 5th, 2011
9:54 am
After Alabama lost to LSU….. Boise State, Stanford, Oklahoma State, Oregon and even Oklahoma all had their chance to win-out to finish #2. Oklahoma State lost to an awful, unranked Iowa State team (after blowing a 17 point lead), Stanford lost to Oregon, Oregon lost to USC, and Oklahoma went on to lose two games. Out of all of those loses Bama lost in OT by 3 points to the #1 team in the nation. They had the best one loss out of any other team in the nation. Sorry that the SEC produced the two best teams in the nation, but thats just how it ends up. No one deserved a title shot against LSU more than Alabama. BCS GOT IT RIGHT!
Rematch
December 5th, 2011
9:54 am
Not only have we had several repeat matchups in the Super Bowl we have also had several rematches where division foes who have already played twice meet a 3rd time in the playoffs. The argument from some on here against a rematch is just plain dumb.
Oh, and a rematch is also not without precedent. Just ask Florida-Florida State in 1996. And a conference non champion playing in the national title game is also not without precedent. Just ask Nebraska and OU.
The purpose of the bcs is to match the 2 best teams in the land. It did that.
MaxxFalconDawgBraveHawk
December 5th, 2011
9:54 am
MB, you are way off the mark here. I hate the BCS, but ironically it got it correct this time. Alabama is clearly the #2 team in the country. I guarantee you Alabama would not lose to Iowa St on the road, and Oklahoma ST beating Oklahoma was not as impressive to me considering OU’s relative collapse leading up to that game, also OU had no Ryan Broyles which is huge as he’s the 2nd best WR in the country to Blackmon. OK St would have NO chance against LSU at all. In your scenario, we would watch Alabama blow out whoever they played and watch LSU blow out OK St and wonder what could have been. BCS got it right this time, you got it wrong.
Hey Bradley
December 5th, 2011
9:55 am
The wonderful thing about football is there is less than 15 games. Each Sat is or die. OSU picked a terrible Sat to die.
allen981
December 5th, 2011
9:55 am
Hey SammV and every other Alabama idiot – any team that has such a poor kicking game that it can’t kick one 40 yard field goal in 4 tries should also not be national champion.
Remember this, Bama boys: you had two huge games on your own field in 2 years – LSU and Auburn last year – and lost them both. Where’s the mystique of that? Auburn whipped your ass when it meant everything to your program, and so did LSU.
To me, that means one thing:Tuscaloosa must be LOSERVILLE.
What a clown
December 5th, 2011
9:57 am
NFL ARGUMENTS DON’T WORK IN THIS… Good luck trying to convince an Alabama fan that or any delusional fan that… True The Giants got beaten by the patriots during their undefeated regular season, then the Giants beat them in the “REMATCH” in the Superbowl… OH YEAH THE GIANTS HAD TO FIRST WIN 3 ROAD PLAYOFF GAMES….
Learn some facts before you throw the NFL argument of any sort out here…
Doug
December 5th, 2011
9:58 am
Most of America saw the earlier Alabama – LSU game and saw that other than missed field goals, Alabama outplayed LSU. Additionally, Bama did not lost to a 6-6 team or 7-5 whatever Iowa State is. If Bama had lost to Miss. State or Vandy, they would not be in this game.
So, quit complaining and lobby for the system to be changed. I agree we need a plus one system. It would have been great to have Ala – Okla St or Stanford play to get in the title game.
smartazz11
December 5th, 2011
9:58 am
what’s stupid about this whole BCS vs playoff crap, is the SEC and ACC actually wanted a +1 system and introduced it in 2008…. it was rejected by every AQ conference…. so it’s stupid for any Big 12, Big 10, Pac 10, Big East fans to scream for a playoff system, they had their chance and it was laughed at….
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:58 am
GA has not been relevant for so long that any time they lose it is just another loss with no National impact.
42-10, get back under the porch little poodles.
Paul in NH
December 5th, 2011
9:58 am
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
9:53 am
The NFL Super Bowl winner, the wild card Packers. The MLB World Series Champs, the wild card Cardinals. The NCAA possible National Champs, the wild card Crimson Tide..
—-
There is no such thing in football as NCAA National Champions – unless you are talking about FCS (formerly known as Div 1AA).
The BCS cartel is specifically designed to ensure that there is NOT an NCAA Div 1 champion and is purely designed to maintain the power of the bowls.
Tom in Atl
December 5th, 2011
10:00 am
I have read repeatedly how LSU Blew out UGA – did anyone watch this game? UGA DOMINATED LSU for the first half – not even close. two dropped Td’s, a dropped pick 6, a missed FG, and a bogus LSU TD (A TD that was sprung by an obvious Block in the Back, and then counted when the ball never crossed the goal line). LSU had no first downs, and 12 total yards. The score should have easily been 21 or 24-0. Eventually LSU wore down UGA – and tacked on several late scores to make the game appear – to those that didn’t actually see it – like they just dominated from the opening whistle. Oh and Honeybadger’s 2nd punt return, which was freaking unreal I admit, also had a block in the back, on Rambo, at the UGA 40, when they had him finally boxed in and he stutter steps – go watch the tape –
Never any doubt that LSU was better than UGA – but this was very competitive until the final quarter.
Rocky Salet
December 5th, 2011
10:00 am
OK Mark, lets do a little 101 columnist reporting on common opponents since you have no clue sir: LSU vs. Bama Common Opponents with LSU score first: LSU-Miss St. 19-6, Bama-Miss St. 24-7, Florida 41-11, 38-10, TN. 38-7, 37-6, Auburn 45-10, 42-14, Arkansas 41-17, 38-14. Bama completes pass on 1 yard line instead of a great LSU interception, Bama wins, you would be writing the same article bashing LSU? AND the game would of not gone in to overtime? LOOK AT THE COMMON OPPONENT SCORES, I VERY MUCH DOUBT THE OKIES WOULD OF HAD SIMILAR RESULTS, BOY, U BLEW THIS ARTICLE
SawThat1nce
December 5th, 2011
10:01 am
That was some good writing there MB.
OSU gets the big bonga-donga in the yingyang, just like Georgia did in 2007.
ESPN is evil. I just don’t even watch it.
The BCS is ridiculous, and it also sux.
opinion
December 5th, 2011
10:02 am
FACT: AL is offered a double elimination shot at the mythical national championship. No other school gets a redo. Corruption lives. Time for congress to regulate the BCS via the interstate commerce clause. If the power football conferences want to break away and try to form their own “NCAA”, congress will step in and shut them down. As it should be.
RxDawg
December 5th, 2011
10:03 am
Well said Mark. It makes me real uneasy the way ESPN can manipulate outcomes in college football. They anoited Bama in the game. They allowed Saban to come on air (ya know, since Bama was done playing their football…) and plead his case. College football is losing it’s purity. Will be interesting to see how the ratings stack up this time around. I know I’m not that interested in seeing who wins. Won’t take much in my regular life to pull me away from that game.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
10:03 am
call it what you want but it is still NCAA teams, and only NCAA teams, playing for the NC.
Bama Mike
December 5th, 2011
10:03 am
So what should we do refuse to go! It makes perfect sense to me that OSU won their conference and should get a shot at LSU. Alabama Stanford would have been a great matchup as would LSU and Oklahoma State. Should both SEC teams dominate then we would have questioned why the two best teaems did not get in. When we lost to LSU we dropped to either 5th or 6th I cant recall butt a lot had to happen for us to get back to 2 so dont blame us for continuing to win. We are very fortunate to be playing in the title game. All Stanford OSU and Boise State had to do was keep winning and we would not have this conversation.
SawThat1nce
December 5th, 2011
10:03 am
The filters on your machine sux.
mike quinn
December 5th, 2011
10:03 am
HEY DAWGFACT IT’S A FACT THE DOGS (THAT IS THE WAY IT IS SPELLED) WAS THE 5TH BEST TEAM IN THE SEC AND SHOWED WHY WITH THAT GREAT SHOWING AT THE DOME. SO THEY DIDN’T DESERVE TO PLAY FOR A CHAMPIONSHIP. I CAN UNDERSTAND HOW PEOPLE HATE REAL WINNERS WHEN THEY LOVE LOSERS. SO YOU AND MARK GO DROWN YOURSELF TOGETHER IN EACH OTHERS PITY. HAVE A LOVELY DAY.
SammV
December 5th, 2011
10:05 am
And remember that Georgia only beat One Top 25 BCS teams (#25 Auburn) and made it to the SEC Championship game. Boy, does our system stink!!
Painful truth
December 5th, 2011
10:05 am
OK…..900 Hundred plus comments to say what??????
This is the bottom line painful truth,,,,,,If Oak state beats a do nothing down and out Iowa State team, then we are not having this discussion…..They had a chance to make their case on the field and tehy did not…..If they are 12-0 then they would have earned the right to be next in line to get beaten up by LSU, but they did not….. The way I see it, if they are looking for someone to whine about, they need to look in the mirror……..
opinion
December 5th, 2011
10:05 am
@Rocky Salet “Bama completes pass on 1 yard line instead of a great LSU interception, Bama wins”
News flash. Bama lost to LSU. End of discussion.
Do you think OSU would lose to Iowa State if they played again? You forget the womens hoops coach at OSU was killed in a plane crash the same week OSU lost? Are you willing to give OSU a “do over”?
FANtastic
December 5th, 2011
10:05 am
I’ll be boycotting this game, because I just don’t give a crap about watching an encore of the Boring Bowl.
RollSaintsRoll
December 5th, 2011
10:06 am
Quit with the whining and all the cry baby gibberish. The system worked exactly as it it was supposed to and you would feel the same way if it was your team trying to get in. It can not be denied(no matter how badly you want to) that LSU and Bama are the two best teams in the country. LSU would have murdalized OK State.
The General Feeling
December 5th, 2011
10:07 am
I agree Mark. We’ll never get a real matchup until we take opinions and choices out of the equation. Okie State is a already a champion while Alabama is a choice.
opinion
December 5th, 2011
10:08 am
@Painful truth
“They had a chance to make their case on the field and they did not….”
You are correct. LSU beat AL. ROTFLMAO
SawThat1nce
December 5th, 2011
10:08 am
Well, good writing MB.
OK State gets the dodo end of the stick, just like Georgia in “07.
ESPN is not worth watching, in my opin.
The BCS just does not function properly, it’s like hoodoo and voodoo, anything goes.
I hope that this comment does not offend your blog machine.
Play It
December 5th, 2011
10:09 am
Dear Hey Bradley -
Apparently every Saturday is not do or die in Holy Bama land. If so you would already be dead.
LSU 9 Holy Bama 6
End of discussion.
NorthGaDawg
December 5th, 2011
10:10 am
Just further evidence of what a joke the BCS is. As long as ESPN is around, especially Herbstriet, and as long as there isn’t a playoff or some sort of legitimate credentials to play for the title, college football is gonna stink when it gets to this part of the year. Since OSU doesn’t get the shot at LSU, let’s just name LSU champs since they’re the only team playing the game that deserves to be there.
Les W. Moore
December 5th, 2011
10:11 am
The Free World will be rooting for LSU to win.
1eyedJack
December 5th, 2011
10:11 am
Even if Bama loses again they’ll still claim another National Championship.
DP
December 5th, 2011
10:11 am
Has anybody actually watched Big 12 games this year, or in recent years? It looks like flag football compared to the SEC. Robert Griffin III passed for 3998 yards this year and that was only 4th in the conference. It has been this way for several years now. Griffin went down in the first half a couple of games ago, Baylor brought in the second team QB and still put up 617 yards of total offense.
Big 12 passing stats are like steroid era home run numbers in baseball, you have to figure out how to adjust them down for comparison purposes. Oklahoma has been exposed in its last several BCS bowl games. After Texas lost to Alabama in the 2010 championship game, Mack Brown realized Texas couldn’t beat an SEC team in a championship game without a power running game so he overhauled his offense.
Who are the defensive players in the Big 12 that compare to Mathieu, Claiborne, Reid, Mingo, Montgomery, Barron, Kirkpatrick, Hightower, Upshaw and Chapman?
Oklahoma State knew what it had to do to play in the BCS championship game. Beat 29 point underdog Iowa State, then after a bye week take care of business at home against an Oklahoma team without its best wide receiver and running back and with a defense that gave up over 500 yards in 4 games prior to playing OK State. OK State couldn’t beat Iowa State, and they have a complaint about not playing for the national championship?
Doggie
December 5th, 2011
10:12 am
Georgia, OSU, or others could’ve been 13-0 and Herbstriet & ESPN would’ve made sure St. Nick got to play………
truth
December 5th, 2011
10:12 am
@Paul in NH
“The BCS cartel is specifically designed to ensure that there is NOT an NCAA Div 1 champion and is purely designed to maintain the power of the bowls.”
Truth. But you are talking way over the heads of these AL supporters.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
10:12 am
Don’t get me wrong, a playoff is needed as long as it includes “wild card teams”.
Bama Mike
December 5th, 2011
10:12 am
General Feeling. Bottom line system needs revisiting. Cant argue your choice point. We are very fortunate. I would have preferred in all fairness to the conferences champions to have seen an LSU OSU matchup and Alabama Stanford. Offense vs defense in both bowls and it would have given the nation to see what we all feel is the best conference in America.
Matt
December 5th, 2011
10:13 am
Andy- Bamas schedule is 1 game tougher than the dawgs and UGA has been dogged all year for having a “soft schedule”. I think OKSt. would give them a game. Bama is WAY overrated.
Ben an SEC fan
December 5th, 2011
10:13 am
You put a good spin on deflating Alabama’s standing. I, as a UGA and SEC fan, consider the BCS ranking good wheather I agree or don’t agree with it. Let’s pull for our neighbor to beat the LSU team
as they should have won their previous game with LSU. (3 missed field goals and a very questionable goal line take away).
time to
December 5th, 2011
10:14 am
hey mark? what no column on how ‘awesome’ bama and lsu and the sec is?
your not with the program that espn and the sec has outlined for you are you?
wtf! everybody know that bama and lsu and the sec are hands down the top two team by far and the best conference by far in the country. no wait. the whole world.
never mind that they have reinvented a way to keep it that way by cheating via the over signing route.
where is the ncaa in all of this eh? gt loses is acc crown and a win for a jersey and tosu hammered for some tats by you and your fellow nit wit schultz? tosu looses it’s coach scholarships has mutiple seasons ruins because of a a coach that did not over sign yet……
the sec and bama and lsu cheat in a more immoral and unethical way and are ‘REWARDED’ for it by even more exposure and more cash to perpetuate this myth that is their greatness?
maybe it is time to occupy the ncaa, the bcs and ESPN!
GTville
December 5th, 2011
10:14 am
BCS is still far better than what we had before it. At least the popular 1 and 2 play each other.
Keep in mind if a playoff is implemented, it will not be the conference champions. It would be 3 SEC teams, B10 champ, P12 champ, ACC champ, one other (not Boise) and Notre Dame.
Inquiring Minds Want to Know
December 5th, 2011
10:14 am
How does a kid raised by a single mom who works at jobs making about ~24K annual drive a late model tricked out Tahoe while playing football in college?
How does Trent Richardson do this? Will ESPN investigate this? HAHAH. The stinch is strong in AL.
Anti-Playoffs
December 5th, 2011
10:14 am
Before you start saying we need a playoff system, remember that these are students we are talking about. They can’t spend the month of December determining who is #1 and #2. Right now, they need to be hunkering down for some finals. On the other hand, if you want to spend the Spring semester having playoffs, I won’t complain.
Nick Saban
December 5th, 2011
10:14 am
I know I said in 2003 that a team that didn’t win it’s conference championship shouldn’t play for the BCS title. What I meant was anyone as long as it isn’t me!!!
Matt
December 5th, 2011
10:15 am
If Bams wins are they sharing the title?? I mean, how can you crown Bama NC if LSU beat them earlier in the year? Having a record of 1-1 hardly makes you the sole deserver to be NC.
DIT
December 5th, 2011
10:16 am
Why are people bringing UGA up in this conversation? Fans or not fans UGA does not even have a Dawg that hunts in this conversation. Bama fans keep on belittling UGA. This has nothing to do with UGA.
The Bama fans that are made on this sight are the same one’s that know that, according to the current system, bama should not be in this game even if they might be the 2nd best team.
If you need to talk about UGA then turn the clocks back to 07 when all the Bama fans agreedhat UGA should not play for the NC because they did not win their League CG. AND this Dawg agreed with that decision back then and still agrees with the logice, that Saban claimed back in 03, “If you don’t win your league championship game you should not play for the NC.”
Canton
December 5th, 2011
10:16 am
I love all the revisionist history going on regarding 2007. LSU was the #2 ranked BCS team, Ohio State was #1. The SEC homerism knows no limits. Georgia should not have played LSU for the title. Georgia should have played LSU for the SEC championship. But LSU jumped Georgia, Ohio State was at the top spot. Oh, and Georgia was ranked 5 in the final BCS. To hear SEC types tell the story, LSU, Va Tech, AND Oklahoma all screwed the Dogs. The real game was supposed to be #5 Georgia versus #7 USC.
Play It
December 5th, 2011
10:16 am
Miss Alabama has a better body!
Miss Okie State has more talent!
Let’s call it what it is – the Beauty Contest System!
Can’t wait to see Nick in his bikini on Bourbon Street!
BG
December 5th, 2011
10:17 am
RxDawg @ 10:03 — I’m not old enough to remember when college football was “pure.”
BTW, to all those against a rematch — you just need to acknowledge that Bama’s “brand” is better than that of all the wannabees.
Matt
December 5th, 2011
10:17 am
Anti Playoffs- D-1AA does it just fine. Baseball does it in the Spring just fine. Kids are done with school this week so what exactly are they studying for the 4-5 weeks after???
Georgia4Life
December 5th, 2011
10:18 am
Even though I’m a Dawg, all I have to say is Go LSU!! Beat Satan and rolly polly elephants…..
DIT
December 5th, 2011
10:18 am
“Truth. But you are talking way over the heads of these AL supporters.”
Now that was funny right there!
SammV
December 5th, 2011
10:22 am
Hey Allen981, you sound like an Auburn fan! Sorry, but you’re paying way too much for your coaching staff, and you will never have Cam Newton again. So get used to losing again…..
gdawginkalamazoo
December 5th, 2011
10:23 am
I have no problem with the match up. Bama took care of all its business with the exception of the LSU game. Bama is the only one loss team with a loss to the #1 team in the country. The rest, including OSU, lost games that they had no business losing. You can’t complain if you lose. I hope LSU goes the distance and beats Bama. Geaux Tigers!
If #7 would have stayed out fo trouble he would be in NY this weekend. The kid makes things happen on the football field. Great game for him and the Tigers Saturday night.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
10:24 am
Sour Grapes, envy and jealousy is what this is all about, other wise in all “fairness” the fans would be complaining that OK State is ranked ahead of Stanford.
And looking at all the complaints from the dog fans about 2007, every body knows that if GA was in ALA’s position they would have the exact opposite opinion on this subject.
Barners & Fleabags are frisky this morning
December 5th, 2011
10:24 am
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA….
Go buy your Peach Bowl/Outback bowl tickets you homos.
ALL IN… the toilet.
Wait ’til next year!
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
10:25 am
They are just jealous because they are not in the BIG game and have not been for 30 years.
Red Stick
December 5th, 2011
10:25 am
Miles voted Bama 2nd, Ok St 3rd and UGA 10th in the Coaches Poll.
Geaux Tigers
Go SEC
Scott
December 5th, 2011
10:26 am
I was worried maybe Bama did not deserve to be in the championship game. Then I read here that Mark Bradley did not think they deserved to be there and I was so reassured. If Bradley is against it, it must be good!
Gbal
December 5th, 2011
10:26 am
BC$ –
A playoff system in which confrence champions filled 6 slots and two at large were filled by weaker confrence champs….. This would be a joke in my opinion. FAIR ???? In the bball with 64+ treams in the field, having confrence winners, regular season winners, and that a bunch of at large bids depending on ranking…. this can work. I think few can argue that you are not getting the BEST 60+ teams in the field.
In football… I dont think you want to go beyond 8 teams… Maybe 16??? but the goal should be to get the BEST teams in the field. I think this is regardless of confrence, winning confrence….
I like the ranking system to determine the playoff teams VS confrence champions. I want to see THE TOP TEAMS in the playoff. Confrence winners would not accomplish this.
Lil dawg
December 5th, 2011
10:27 am
If UGA was good enough maybe they would have a brand….I brand all my good horses!
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
10:27 am
Since GA can’t run with the big dogs, they just sneak out from under the porch every now and then to yap and nip at the ankles of the top SEC teams.
Disoriented Dawg
December 5th, 2011
10:28 am
What???
We’re not Number 1???
WTF!!!
Big Toxic
December 5th, 2011
10:29 am
Respect the system! OSU should not have lost to ISU! You are only as good as your worst performance! Nevertheless, OSU QB is almost 30! The biggest travesty is Va.Tech and Michigan getting into the BCS over the other higher ranked teams.
Dawgman25
December 5th, 2011
10:30 am
BCS got it right. OSU lost to a fluke Iowa State team. Bama lost to the #1 team in the country. The two best teams in the country are playing for the National Championship!! And besides, LSU or Bama would spank OSU.
BCSconsistancy
December 5th, 2011
10:31 am
In 2007 UGA was sitting in Bama’s shoes and got snubbed from the National title game for LSU because according to the BCS, “You can’t play for the National title if you didn’t win your conference, much less your division”…the only difference between now and then is it’s Bama and Saban. The BCS is crap.
Sour Grapes
December 5th, 2011
10:32 am
and we all saw how they rolled over and laid down in the second half when they faced a real team Saturday night.
42-10 with 42 un-answered points being scored on their mighty bulldog defense.
Now get back under that porch.
Lil dawg
December 5th, 2011
10:32 am
This is not about OK Cowboys but “HATE FOR SABAN AND ALABAMA”…they can’t stand a winner!
DawgFan (the original)
December 5th, 2011
10:32 am
Why are they playing again…LSU already beat them once on their own field no less…no way does this make sense. OSU should be playing cause they one their conference, beat more top 10 teams than Bama, who cares what the poll folks say, the computers have OSU ahead of Bama so I they should go…Mark you are exactly right on this one.
GatorGr8t
December 5th, 2011
10:32 am
Bama is old news!! Probably half their national titles with Bear Bryant were through major recruiting and rules violations, but nobody dared to challenge them back in the day. I mean look where the SEC office is located. Do you think that was coincidence?
anyway, I’m an SEC fan, but Bama had their chance. I say let somebody else get a shot. I mean they couldn’t even win at home!! How can you expect them to win in New Orleans at the Sugar Bowl? What a Joke!!
Gbal
December 5th, 2011
10:33 am
SOur Grapes – Your full of it.
Most UGA fans agree that Bama is the second best team in the country they are ranked #2 by the voters,…and therefore deserve to go to the NC game. UGA should have gone as well in ‘07.
That is the current system… as sorry as it is…. this year the system worked. It got the best 2. In o7, it did not, because ppl (espn)said then that you had to win your confrence.
Keep BCS ranking and voting system…. send top 8 to a Playoff.
Ricardo Cabeza
December 5th, 2011
10:33 am
BCS is secretly controlled by NASCAR! Bah-ha-ha-ha-ha!!!!!
The truth
December 5th, 2011
10:34 am
The BCS is a damned joke. That is all.
DawgFan (the original)
December 5th, 2011
10:34 am
Dawgman25, these two teams already played…they don’t need to play again…give someone else a chance..BCS = ESPN contracts
DP
December 5th, 2011
10:35 am
As an illustration of the difference between SEC football and the flag football currently played in the Big 12, Robert Griffin III’s 3998 yards passing would rank second all time behind Tim Couch’s 4275 yards for Kentucky in 1998. But Griffin’s passing yardage ranked only 4th in the Big 12 THIS SEASON. There is no defense played in the Big 12, so its offensive numbers must be adjusted like offensive numbers of guys who play for the Colorado Rockies or home run numbers during the steroid era.
squintyeyed
December 5th, 2011
10:36 am
Enter your comments here
willdave
December 5th, 2011
10:37 am
The fact that Alabama did not win its division or conference championship means absolutely nothing. If the two best teams in the nation happen to play in the same division, which can only have one winner and send only one representative to the conference championship game, why should Bama be penalized for that? The BCS championship game has always pitted the number 1 team against the number 2 team. If the number 2 team happens to be in the same conference division as the number 1 team, it should not be passed over by an inferior team just because of that unfortunate circumstance.
In an effort to generate more competition, all the major sports have moved toward giving at least some vanquished teams from the regular season the opportunity to defeat the first-place finisher for the season championship. For example, we just saw the St. Louis Cardinals finish the recent MLB regular season behind the Milwaukee Brewers in the NL Central but then defeat the Brew Crew for the NL championship and go on to win another World Series championship. This type of situation occurs quite frequently in major sports now.
Thus, despite that three-point loss in overtime to LSU earlier this season, if the Crimson Tide can defeat the Tigers in a national championship game with all the money on the table, it will deserve to be the national champions for 2011.
Time
December 5th, 2011
10:38 am
The BCS is a sham. And if anyone had any integrity in this process, Alabama would not be granted the chance to play. No sane person argues that they’re not the 2nd best team in the country. They are. But just a few years ago, when many were considering UGA the best team in the country at bowl time, the Dawgs were passed over because of no conference championship. So now the rules are completely different with the true rulers of college football…ESPN. Stay on em Bradley, you’re finally writing something everyone can get behind. Who cares if you don’t get to go to Bristol and crush Bayless.
Lil dawg
December 5th, 2011
10:39 am
Gatorgr8t..Old news..get in real world today man. Alabama has a brand ranked #2 Now! but will beat LSU and be #1..Bet on it….Cry me a river and get a Brand. Yes, UF also needs a Brand.
squintyeyed
December 5th, 2011
10:39 am
same ole song and dance every year. Before this BCS thing at least there was no dillusion. Maybe there doesnt really need to be a champion. Maybe there is simply a rose boowl champ, a sugar bowl champ and so on.
PeachesDawg
December 5th, 2011
10:39 am
to that tired bama fan talking about UGA, yeah we have teams all around us with a NC BUT we send more of our boys to the NFL the last ten years than you or close to it! Keep pimping those boys sending most of them home with NO DEGREES! while we make our’s MILLIONAIRES and or Graduates!!! look it up son!
Seriously??
December 5th, 2011
10:41 am
I am sure Bama would have no prolem playing either of the top “2″ teams from the east considering SC and UGA lost to Ark and LSU by a combined 86-38!!! Bradley you are an idiot to think that a team that loses to Iowa St should paly for a NC…no matter the circumstances. Losing to Iowa St is like losing to Vandy..oh wait…didn’t Vandy spank UK by 30 Bradley and wasn’t UGA a shoe string tackle away from losing to Vandy? Bradley- stick with something you actually have knowledge of- like horse racing or UK basketball probation terms!!
Ted M
December 5th, 2011
10:41 am
What can the fans do to get a college football playoff?
MickeyPudge
December 5th, 2011
10:41 am
I don’t understand the uproar. The BCS, plain and simple is to pit number 1 versus number 2. LSU clearly proved that it is 1. OSU did not, the Big 12 is a garbage conference with gimmicky offenses and non-existent defenses. Bama is the best one loss team, it is not clear. Why should we care who is most deserving when the mission of the BCS is to give us 1 versus 2. The Big 12 gets ranked teams only by the points they score. Look at their BCS record the last 7 years and when the opponent is of any caliber the result is usually a LOSS! Have any of you seen the beatings the SEC delivers to these tier 2 leagues in the championship game? I have and it gets boring after awhile. Now we have something worth watching.
285exp
December 5th, 2011
10:42 am
Ya’ll whine all you want, all the major polls, and especially the ones that count, have Alabama at #2. Honestly, does anybody really think that Oklahoma State, with their #107 ranked defense, could beat LSU? It isn’t all about your sense of Cosmic Justice, it’s about the rules of the BCS, where the #1 and #2 teams meet in the championship game. Get over it.
kt
December 5th, 2011
10:42 am
After Alabama lost to LSU….. Boise State, Stanford, Oklahoma State, Oregon and even Oklahoma all had their chance to win-out to finish #2. Oklahoma State lost to an awful, unranked Iowa State team (after blowing a 17 point lead), Stanford lost to Oregon, Oregon lost to US