
Will Mike Bibby's replacement fare better against the pictured Jameer Nelson? (AJC photo by Curtis Compton)
1. Kirk Hinrich is much better defensively than Mike Bibby and will be more than a swinging gate versus Rajon Rondo or Jameer Nelson or Derrick Rose come the playoffs.
2. Hinrich might be better able to play alongside Jamal Crawford than Bibby was. But I’m not sure Hinrich will play as well in tandem with Joe Johnson, who’s not easy to complement.
3. When the Hawks traded for Bibby in February 2008, he was 29 and had started nearly every NBA game since leaving college. Hinrich is 30 and hasn’t been a full-time starter since 2008. (Granted, it was Hinrich’s misfortune to have been on teams that drafted two point guards — Rose and John Wall — No. 1 overall.)
4. Hinrich’s career three-point percentage is .379. So is Bibby’s. Hinrich has averaged 5.7 assists per game. So has Bibby.
5. Hinrich is under contract through 2012, which gives the Hawks a year’s cover if/when Crawford leaves as a free agent.
6. Hinrich makes more money — $9 million to Bibby’s $5.5 million this season, $8 million to Bibby’s $6.2 million next — so we can’t accuse the Hawks of taking the cheaper way this time. But it’s unclear whether this trade pushes the Hawks above the luxury-tax threshold, which is always a concern with the Atlanta Spirit. (And you’ll note that the Hawks currently have only 14 players on their roster; the NBA allows 15.)
7. As much as fans had soured on Bibby, he remained hugely respected by teammates. Josh Smith told me earlier this season that Bibby set the best screens of any Hawk — try finding another point guard who fits that description — and he was utterly unafraid to take the big shot.
8. The Hawks had better win now because they punted away much of their future. They traded two No. 1 picks — Jordan Crawford and this year’s first choice — for Hinrich and Hilton Armstrong. That’s a lot to spend for a 30-year-old point guard who has never been an All-Star and who hasn’t been starting at the position he’ll be asked to play.
9. Given the draft record of Rick Sund and Dave Pendergraft, not having a No. 1 pick this year might not be so damaging. In two years they’ve landed Jeff Teague, who has disappointed two head coaches, and Jordan Crawford, who scored 67 points as a Hawk.
10. There’s little time for assimilation. Of the Hawks’ remaining 25 games, 15 will come against teams that currently hold winning records. (Heck, 12 of the next 15 will be against opponents above .500.) The Hawks are fifth in the East, a game and a half behind Orlando and four games ahead of the Knicks. It would be surprising if that position changes before the playoffs commence. Which would mean: Kirk Hinrich would indeed get his chance to chase Jameer Nelson in Round 1.
Oh, and one thing more: According to esteemed former colleague Michael Lee, now of the Washington Post, Bibby was so upset by the trade that he is considering buying out his own contract. (In the NBA, this is known as going the Zydrunas Ilgauskas route.) Lee reports, however, that such a tack might not be feasible for Bibby.
By Mark Bradley
155 comments Add your comment
Lew Burdette
February 28th, 2011
8:16 am
What, are you part time time?
Shimmy Shamwow
February 28th, 2011
11:24 am
The stupidest moves were drafting Marvin Williams over Chris Paul and resigning 16 point per game average Joe Johnson to 28 point per game money… These are the true setbacks. This franchise is done.
mad skills
February 28th, 2011
11:40 am
I am a Bulls fan, but more so a Hinrich fan. You guys got a steal! Think who wanted Kirk to be their point guard, think Lakers. Yeah they wanted him bad to take Fisher’s job. And the Bulls miss him dearly and would have tried to get him back if it wasn’t for the league rules. He is the solid guy I think your team has missed over the last few years. I think you’re scary good now. It has been the stupid attitude, knowing your team have great athletes and just better than other teams. But you made those dozen plays a game which cost you points or added them to your opponents. Boston is old, Miami is small, Orlando is really just one player and Chicago is really not that athletic. Think good thoughts….
peter
February 28th, 2011
1:49 pm
In my humble opinion as a 29 year season ticket holder the point is that you want to see your team play hard. Mike Bibby not only couldnt defend but he hardly even tried. When your team “leader” doesnt try hard do you think our young “fun bunch” can grasp that concept on its own. You all saw what happened in the playoffs last year and against good teams this year.
Secondly Hinrich has never played with teamates this talented nor has he ever played with a team that could benefit more from the things he brings. If the chemistry works we just might all be surprised. I for one am glad we did this deal
True Hawk Fan
March 1st, 2011
12:50 pm
Mark, Hinrich looked like a swinging gate to me over the weekend. Didn’t stop anyone and had two turnovers at the end of the Portland game that almost cost us the game. Being “feisty” on defense means nothing if you can’t stop anybody. Monta Ellis and Andre Miller had him for lunch. Where is the ball handling? Non-existent so far. What do you expect when you give up the farm for an old horse. Now he has a calf injury. From what? It certainly wasn’t from playing defense. The fact he couldn’t start because of 2 no. 1 draft picks just means he was not worth 2 vets and 2 first round draft picks. Should he be a starter? Two teams thought no and started rookies. He lost out to two kids, one of whom is not long removed from high school. Please don’t mention Armstrong as part of the trade. We all know that was filler at best. I don’t mind trades, just not stupid trades.