
New manager Fredi Gonzalez asks Dan Uggla for a loan. (AJC photo by Brant Sanderlin)
Dan Uggla brings a reliable bat to a team lacking reliable bats. But he’s a lousy fielder — the 2010 Braves weren’t very good at catching the ball, either — and he turns 31 in March. So now I ask: Is this the guy you want to re-up for $60 million over five seasons?
Nick Cafardo, the fine baseball writer for the Boston Globe, just Tweeted that “Atlanta sources tell me Dan Uggla closing in on a five-year, $60-$61 million extension.” If this is true, I say …
That’s almost Chipper Jones money. For a guy who demonstrably isn’t Chipper Jones.
You can argue that Uggla is a better hitter at 30 than Chipper is at 38 — and Uggla isn’t coming off knee surgery — but still: Twelve million a year for a guy who has driven in 100 runs once in his career and who has never hit .300 and who’s surely going to have to find a new position soon? That’s a lot of money.
If you’re a fan, you wouldn’t mind such an outlay. If you’re a fan, you’re tired of the one-and-dones — J.D. Drew, Mark Teixeira — breezing through town en route to a massive contract elsewhere. And you’d hate to have given away the All-Stat utilitarian Omar Infante and the live young arm of Mike Dunn for another rental. (And besides, it isn’t your money. It’s Liberty Media’s.)
Me, I’m not sure Uggla is a cornerstone player. I think he’s good man to have on a team, but I don’t see him as a man capable of carrying said team. On the one hand, it’d be nice to see the Braves willing to invest so much money again. On the other, I’m not certain this is the man in whom so much should be invested.
You are, as ever, free to disagree. And I know you will.
By Mark Bradley
241 comments Add your comment
rawdawg
December 16th, 2010
4:16 pm
First
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
4:18 pm
Is 4 yrs possible? …I’d do that for sure
Mark Bradley
December 16th, 2010
4:18 pm
I almost wrote: If rawdawg is first again — for the fifth time in four days — we might as well retire the trophy. Except that we don’t have a trophy.
So let’s settle on yet another round of kudos.
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
4:20 pm
Mark,
When next do you cover Jackets BB? I feel the need to _itch about Hewitt.
J.J.M.
December 16th, 2010
4:21 pm
Why cant they let him earn a new contract? I would let the season play out first before making a move like that.
Jay W
December 16th, 2010
4:22 pm
Uggla’s definitely worth it in the short term — we’ll need a great right handed bat to go up against Cliff Lee four or five times a year. The real question, why is a reporter in Boston breaking an Atlanta baseball story? Is everybody on vacation at the AJC — other than you, of course.
Mark Bradley
December 16th, 2010
4:23 pm
I don’t know, Ted M. Not sure I have much new to offer on that front.
shawn
December 16th, 2010
4:23 pm
Mark,
I would suggest to look at Jason Werth contract cha cha….$12 Mil for Uggla is reasonable. If you want to talk about over paying for a player, it had to be Derek Low..($15 Mil)…This article does not make much sense…
Jack
December 16th, 2010
4:23 pm
Yes, The Braves need to sign him.
Einsteindawg
December 16th, 2010
4:25 pm
Hi Mark, are they Braves any closer to unloading KK? This might free up some money.
matt r
December 16th, 2010
4:25 pm
4 straight seasons of 30-HR, that is so rare in post-steroid baseball. But 5 years for a 31 yr old is risky. I have a much bigger problem with the # of yrs than with the $12M/yr
What??
December 16th, 2010
4:25 pm
I don’t think it’s really fair to compare the $14mil that Chipper makes to signing Uggla to a $12mil deal. Player salaries have gone up significantly since Chipper inked his last big deal and the Braves haven’t had a 30hr / 100 rbi guy in a long while. We really need a nice bat in the middle. Wren knows that he will probably have some additional dollars to play with once Liberty sells the Braves after this coming season. That’s why he has held onto most of the pitching prospects rather than trade them for CFs like some of the idiots on these blogs have suggested. He wants to see what the new paradigm will be with new ownership before making any massive moves.
What??
December 16th, 2010
4:26 pm
should have been “unfair to compare”
Calibre Lake Dawg
December 16th, 2010
4:27 pm
way too much money…for a guy that age…but like you said “it’s not my money”
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
4:28 pm
$60 mil for 5 yrs might actually turn out to be a bargain. Uggla does hit great at Turner Field.
It only hurts when you laugh
December 16th, 2010
4:28 pm
This bozo isn’t over-the-hill, since he was never on top of the hill.
Run the arrogant bum out of town on a rail.
Mark Bradley
December 16th, 2010
4:29 pm
If the Braves find somebody to take Kawakami off their hands, we might have to stop the presses, Einsteindawg.
Herschel Talker
December 16th, 2010
4:30 pm
MB:
While I agree that this seems like overpaying, it is nowhere near the egregious overpaying we did to Chipper on his last contract, which he is still under. That was a Derek Jeter type contract, where we were rewarding him for his prior performance, but make no mistake about it: that contract was horrible and currently hamstrings the Braves. The Uggla one, while excessive, is unfortunately more a sign of the times for a solid player.
HT
Herschel Talker
December 16th, 2010
4:31 pm
MB:
On another note, if you were GM right now, what move would you be looking to make right now? Give me something within the realm of possibility to address a weakness we will need to shore up in order to compete for the wild card.
HT
Mark Bradley
December 16th, 2010
4:32 pm
Let me think about that one, Herschel.
I guess Tulowitzki’s off the market, huh?
LawDawg
December 16th, 2010
4:35 pm
Mark – your acknowledgment of the “First” thing only perpetuates the myth that it is not for complete losers (and I guess rawdawg is now king of the people I want nothing to do with).
12 mil a year for Uggla? No chance. I can see paying him 9-10 million a season, but even that is a lot of money for a borderline three-true-outcomes type of player.
LawDawg
December 16th, 2010
4:37 pm
HT – Chipper took a hometown discount basically every year of his career and even his last contract was fairly below market considering his age and track record. He probably could have made double with the Yanks.
Keeper
December 16th, 2010
4:38 pm
Mark, tagging along with What??’s comment, not only is Chipper money not current-world money (for the la la land that is baseball economics), but even back when Larry put his name to the dotted line – does he sign Larry or Chipper? – he wasn’t getting “Chipper Jones money.” He could’ve gone to, say, the Mets for a bundle more and let Shea watch him from Shea.
Oh, and Ted M, not much point in covering the Jackets any time soon – they’ll be losing to my Spiders this weekend. Though the Bahamas sure beat Starkville!!
DDog10
December 16th, 2010
4:40 pm
I absolutely would NOT. I did not and still do not think this was a good move on the Braves part. He will make roughly 8 times what Omar made and his numbers are not good enough to justified the move. It amazes me how people get rich making moves like this.
Army Strong
December 16th, 2010
4:40 pm
You get the guy knowing the bat he brings and knowing the liability of his glove. I think 12 mill is a good price for his bat. If he was gold glove caliber with his 30hr 100rbi ability at a middle infield spot, I think he would warrant 17-20 million a year over at least 4 years.
timthebrave
December 16th, 2010
4:41 pm
How much did Liberty pay their CEO? They can afford it. Uggla would probably have over 100 rbi’s if he played for someone other than the Marlins
Mark Bradley
December 16th, 2010
4:41 pm
I really worry about Uggla’s defense. I think the memory of Game 3 of the NLDS will linger long in my mind.
epic_quibble
December 16th, 2010
4:43 pm
Uggla’s an upgrade, but he ain’t $60 mil of upgrade.
Unless I get a cut.
Herschel Talker
December 16th, 2010
4:43 pm
LawDawg:
I don’t care. He was a bum the last few years and was massively overpaid.
HT
Tweets that mention Would you pay $60 to keep Dan Uggla? The Braves just might | Mark Bradley -- Topsy.com
December 16th, 2010
4:46 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Bradley, Mark Bradley. Mark Bradley said: Would you pay $60 to keep Dan Uggla? According to @nickcafardo, the #Braves just might. (Not sure I would, though.) http://bit.ly/gPJJ7E [...]
LawDawg
December 16th, 2010
4:48 pm
He may have been a bum over the last two years, but he was not overpaid from the perspective of the time the contract was entered…hindsight is 20/20.
Eric
December 16th, 2010
4:48 pm
Considering the amount of money Jayson Werth got from the Nationals, Uggla is definitely worth $12 million. As soon as this deal gets done, Wren needs to focus on locking up Heyward for a while so we don’t have to pay him $15 million a year.
whocares
December 16th, 2010
4:51 pm
Wren has no clue when it comes to signing players too big money contracts. There is an old saying, that if you throw enough sh– on a wall, some of it will stick. How about the contracts and the overpaid players this idiot signed that the braves cant get rid of. Lowe for $15 million, you have go to be kidding me. And let’s not forget the next cy young winner from Japan, Kiwi——, guy won one game last year, and he is still under contract for millions. Then we have the overpaid, crybaby, Chipper Hurt Again Jones, and his $15 or 13 million, whatever it is, the braves are stuck with it, and this for a guy that can’t get out of bed without hurting or pulling something. Wren should have never resigned Jones to a long term contract with his injury prone career coming to an end, and Lowe and the Japanese wonder were just desperation signings due to the fact the Braves had lost out on 2 or 3 big time free agent pitchers. This team is stuck with an idiot for a G.M, and ownership that doesn’t know where the stadium is. Add that to the fact the G.M has committed 3/4 of the braves budget to 2 overpaid pitchers and an over the hill 3rd baseman, and you see why the Phillies are the class of the National league now.
Mitchell
December 16th, 2010
4:52 pm
If we can win the World Series once in the next six years and his only contribution to said championship is that he doesn’t make a costly, Conradesque error, then it’s worth it.
F-105 Thunderchief
December 16th, 2010
4:53 pm
I’m just so glad he’s not another rental that it’s OK by me.
James
December 16th, 2010
4:56 pm
Yes in a heartbeat the Braves will be getting a bargain if they sign him to that deal.
Andrew in PA
December 16th, 2010
4:58 pm
Mark look at the market right now. If Uggla were a FA this year he could get 15 mill a year. I’d take Uggla making 12-13 mill a year over Lowe and his 15 mill anyday.
Walker, Texas Ranger
December 16th, 2010
4:59 pm
For a 30 HR left fielder, it’s not a bad deal. For a 2nd basemen with over 20 errors, it is overpaying.
Braves Season Ticket Holder
December 16th, 2010
4:59 pm
Would you pay 60 Cents for a full-year AJC subscription?
I wouldn’t.
Big Al
December 16th, 2010
4:59 pm
rawdawg, get a feaking life man
JSS
December 16th, 2010
5:01 pm
What’s the beef? That is a moderate salary in the new market place… The Yankees are playing ancient Derek Jeter $17 million under his new deal… The thing that needs to be asked is why this was not paid when Teixeira was there for the reupping?
Over for 2010
December 16th, 2010
5:01 pm
Lowe will be gone next season as well as KK. I think we can afford to give Uggla some of that money dont you. After all, neither will be resigned and our pitching of the future is here.
5 years is a good deal. Its time we got some real players and Chipper will be on the bench most of the year so we need Uggla.
Walker, Texas Ranger
December 16th, 2010
5:01 pm
Mitchell, I don’t think he is above making a Conradesque error.
Andrew in PA
December 16th, 2010
5:02 pm
DOB stopped breaking ATL news since his little Ken Griffey Jr accident.
Herschel Talker
December 16th, 2010
5:02 pm
LawDawg:
He was already old and decrepit. Completely predictable that he would be an injury-plagued disaster.
FIRE MARK RICHT
HT
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
5:02 pm
Uggla’s fielding % is the same as Infante’s and Prado.
I think KK is a much better pitcher then McLouth is a hitter & CF. I would eat McLouth’s contract and make KK the 5th guy
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
5:05 pm
Chipper will only start 80 games due an injury.
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
5:06 pm
HT – I’m not exactly clear on what you thing UGA should do. ha
Asheville Dawg
December 16th, 2010
5:08 pm
This makes a lot more sense then Kawakami. Also, with as little pop in the Braves line up, seems to make a lot more sense.
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
5:09 pm
Chipper is “stealing money”. The Braves owe him $26 mil over the next two years. If Uggla does end up signing $60 mil spread over 5 years, it will be BARGAIN on what we’re paying Dipper, because The Dipper (his stats have dipped big time) is dipping big time without putting out (in other words, The Dipper is like a “pretty lady” who one showers with gifts ($26 mil), yet refuses(meaning he’s way past his prime) to put out).
At least Uggla is going to “put out”, not come up with excuses (injuries) why he can “put out”.
El Bravo
December 16th, 2010
5:10 pm
It’s not necessarily a bad deal when you compare it to what has transpired in the market this off-season. Compared to the deals Werth and Crawford signed this is a bargain. It also depends on how the deal is structured. Remember that the Braves don’t give no-trade clauses, meaning that if the deal is somewhat back-loaded it gives the Braves the option to unload him towards the end of the deal (if we find ourselves out of contention).
Ted M
December 16th, 2010
5:11 pm
The Braves owe him $28 mil…pretty sure
Mitchell
December 16th, 2010
5:12 pm
Mark Bradley
December 16th, 2010
4:41 pm
I really worry about Uggla’s defense. I think the memory of Game 3 of the NLDS will linger long in my mind.
Brad, I don’t think you realize who you’re dealing with. This isn’t a real sports town. These aren’t your average sports fans.
If it were, Bobby Cox would have been booted out of here after the ‘96 World Series… if not after the ‘93 NLCS, or, for that matter, the ‘92 World Series, or, for that matter, the ‘91 World Series.
At least after the ‘99 World Series. Or the 2001 NLCS. Or the 2003 NLDS. Or the 92 loss 2008 season.
If we had real sports fans, you wouldn’t have heard people proclaiming that the only man to lose four World Series was one of the all time greats immediately after he singlehandedly blew yet another post-season series.
If you listened to local sports radio in this town for any period of time in the weeks and months since the gut wrenching defeat to the eventual World Champion San Francisco Giants, you would have discovered that the memory of Game 3 of the NLDS has all but been forgotten.
I, however, have not forgotten. I have also not forgotten that Bobby Cox is solely respsonsible for what transpired.
Hopefully, Fredi Gonzalez is somebody who values discipline and accountability. If not, then we can probably expect to see Dan Uggla’s spotty defense worsen, in which case he’ll be right at home with the Braves.
No need to single him out even if he could be looking at $60 million over the next five years.
The end.
Harry the Hat
December 16th, 2010
5:12 pm
Paying Uggla anything is a freaking joke.
He may be qualified enough for batboy.
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
5:13 pm
Mark Bradley……what do you think of the Braves trading Derek Lowe and his 2 year, $30 mil contract to the Yankees (who obviously need starting pitching with a track record for being mentally tough enough to handle an environment like New York)? Lowe had a great September and pitched 2 good games against San Francisco in he play-offs.
Trading Lowe (either to acquire a player in return who fills a legit need……or for nothing (a bag of balls type prospect) if the Yankees were to also take McLouth’s or Kawakami’s contract off our hands)…..would free up considerable money for the Braves to spend towards improving the team (the Braves have the prospects to trade for Zach Greinke, if Lowe’s contract was gone).
Stinky
December 16th, 2010
5:15 pm
Concerning Uggly: Who else are we gonna get for 12mil / year who might be able to launch 30 HR?
Herschel Talker
December 16th, 2010
5:16 pm
Ted M:
What should UGA do? They should do the 2-step program to improving the football program.
1. Fire Mark Richt
2. Hire one of the following gentlemen:
Gary Patterson
Kirby Smart
Jim Harbaugh
Chip Kelly
Chris Peterson
Guz Malzahn
HT
Herschel Talker
December 16th, 2010
5:18 pm
“Mark Bradley……what do you think of the Braves trading Derek Lowe and his 2 year, $30 mil contract to the Yankees (who obviously need starting pitching with a track record for being mentally tough enough to handle an environment like New York)? Lowe had a great September and pitched 2 good games against San Francisco in he play-offs.
Trading Lowe (either to acquire a player in return who fills a legit need……or for nothing (a bag of balls type prospect) if the Yankees were to also take McLouth’s or Kawakami’s contract off our hands)…..would free up considerable money for the Braves to spend towards improving the team (the Braves have the prospects to trade for Zach Greinke, if Lowe’s contract was gone).”
While you’re at it, why not throw in trade for Albert Pujols? This is one of the dumbest comments ever written on a blog. The chances of the Yankees taking Lowe and one of McLouth/Kawakami are about as good as McLouth and Kawakami winning the MVP and Cy Young this year.
Stinky
December 16th, 2010
5:19 pm
That Michelle sure is a drama queen.
Todd
December 16th, 2010
5:25 pm
And exactly where would you get the 30 home runs that Uggla is doing to hit – at any price Bradley? Last time I checked the only other 30 HR free agent was an even worse fielder and plays first base (Dunn). 12 mil per year just does not go very far these days. We got a great deal – history will shine favorably on the Braves for this signing.
Stinky
December 16th, 2010
5:29 pm
Enter your comments here
Rockdale Brave
December 16th, 2010
5:30 pm
Mark: I agree with you. Uggla is not the player the Braves should pay $12 million per year. A much better
investment for $60 million over 5 years would be for
a power hitting outfielder. A second baseman should
not be the position player to depend on as the major power hitter in your lineup. One may argue that it does not matter what position provides the power; however any outfielder worth 12M/year must provide big power numbers. You can get a good defensive .280 hitting 2B for much less.
stevie zero
December 16th, 2010
5:32 pm
Enter your comments here
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
5:36 pm
Herschel Talker………Dude, have you even been following the Yankees struggles for starting pitching? Right now, their rotation consists of C.C. Sabathia, Phil Hughes and A.J. Burnett (whose a mental case right now on the mound)……..that’s it.
The Yankees are not about to pay the next best starting pitcher (Carl Pavano) on a very weak market because Pavano couldnt make it work his first time in N.Y. (injuries, dude basically sucked, lol)….nor are they going to risk acquiring another Ed Whitson (Zach Greinke is a good pitcher, who has never pitched well in N.Y. AND has a social anxiety disorder that he takes meds for).
So knowing that all….the Yankees need for starting pitching ISNT GOING AWAY. And considering that most teams arent exactly in a mood to just give away starting pitching (AND given the Yankees need for quality starting pitching who has the “intangibles” to flourish in an environment like N.Y. isnt going away)……I do not see that it is far fetched at all that the Yankees would “at least” be interested in acquiring Derek Lowe from the Braves.
Assuming that the Yankees have a legit interest in Lowe….the next question becomes “how does Frank Wren handle this”? Does he try to obtain a legit prospect or player off the Yankees roster in exchange for Lowe…..OR…….does he say to the Yankees, “you dont have to give us anything back for Lowe, AS LONG as you’re willing to take either McLouth’s or Kawakami’s contract off our hands”.
Sure, it may sound far fetched. However, the Braves are dealing from a position of strength…….along with knowing that the Yankees are desperate for quality starting pitching who is mentally tough enough to handle pitching well in N.Y.
I can see how you may not agree with my post. But to call it “the stupidest post you’ve ever seen”….well, shows how stupid you are.
stevie zero
December 16th, 2010
5:38 pm
mark, had the braves balked at the oppurtunity to sign a middle infielder, with more homeruns than any brave has come close to sniffing over the last four years, and at a relatively reasonable 12 mil a year, you would all be pi$$ing and moaning. defense? mediocre at best, but the braves have zero power, zero speed, zero defense, and wont play smallball to manufacture runs, i agree about the defense but you gotta start somewhere. wren is kind of a cowboy but he had to do it
Supes
December 16th, 2010
5:44 pm
That’s a fair market value considering what other FA are getting out there in the open market. 60 Million…or about 12 million per season…We are paying Chipper what close to 15 million right now (and for 2 more seasons looks like unless he retires after 2011). Consider that ….Uggla’s is a fair contract.
Dawgdad (The Original)
December 16th, 2010
5:47 pm
Mark good article, I agree totally. Much rather have spent the money acquiring Mr Willingham from the Nationals instead of letting the A’s get him. There are better ways to spend their limited money. I like Uggla, but like you question his range and defense and age. Maybe three years for $24 M or so, and if he was not willing to accept, trade him at the deadline for some prospects.
Mike
December 16th, 2010
5:47 pm
Mark, what your looking at is the rise in cost of players. If Chipper Jones was the same age now that he was when he signed that big contract with the Braves, they would have to pay him $20+ million per year. That is the going price for the big time free agents.
$12 million per year could sign a top free agent 10 years ago. Now it signs a second tier guy like Uggla. Its basically today’s equivalent of paying $7-8 million for a player 10 years ago. That’s why the GM’s were pissed at the Werth contract. Contracts like that just keep driving the free agent price up for all levels of players. At the end of 5 years, I think the Braves will be happy to have kept Uggla.
dawgfan
December 16th, 2010
5:48 pm
nobody cares about baseball anyway. let’s get back to talking about the Georgia Bulldogs. Go Dawgs! woof woof woof
Dawgdad (The Original)
December 16th, 2010
5:50 pm
Just a general question. The Braves are constantly talking about wanting a middle infielder, who can back up at shortstop. Why don’t they invite Nick Greene to ST and see if he can make the team. Not much to lose with an invite and league minimum.
"Chef" Tim Dix
December 16th, 2010
5:50 pm
12 large is the old 6.
Good move.
Whopper Dawg
December 16th, 2010
5:50 pm
Mark, I think you are right. It is a good sign that the Braves are willing to spend this much money, just wrong guy.
TS
December 16th, 2010
5:52 pm
Chipper hasn’t been worth Chipper money in nearly a decade. Uggla is worth it.
SF Braves Fan
December 16th, 2010
5:56 pm
12 million dollars a year honestly doesn’t seem that much to me in modern baseball terms, especially in an era where even Jeff Francoeur can sign a multi-million dollar deal after putting up a .300 OBP. The Braves organization is overflowing with young pitching talent, and it looks like they will have a potent, affordable pitching staff for a long time. That’s a good thing, but it does mean the Braves have to open the checkbook a bit for position players and offer than more than one or two years. The alternative is to build a lineup of AAAA players and rejects whom they can sign to one or two year contracts. If the Braves can get three years of 30 hr from Uggla and another 2 years where he hits at least 20 it will have been a good move, and 12 million isn’t going to seem like that much once Chipper, Lowe, KK, and McLouth come off the books.
Also– who cares how many RBI the guy has driven in with the Marlins? We know he’s a good hitter.
Reality Check
December 16th, 2010
6:00 pm
Twelve million per season for a player who will eventually be the Braves left fielder?
OVERPAID. But so are most major league players, I’m just glad it’s not my money.
Franky Fingers
December 16th, 2010
6:01 pm
“almost Chipper money”
The market is changing. Try and keep up.
Mark (a different one)
December 16th, 2010
6:02 pm
I think this is a good deal if it happens. The Braves have some contracts around their neck but this won’t be one of them unless he gets injured. RBIs are not a very good comparison. Uggla will do well with runners ahead of him. Let Prado and Heyward and possibly Chipper fill the bases, and then see how many RBIs Uggla hits. I see something like:
McLouth/Shafer CF
Prado LF
Heyward RF
Chipper 3rd
Uggla 2nd
McCann C
Gonzales SS
Freeman 1b
If Shafer and McLouth struggle (hey, it could happen), move CF to hit 8 and move everyone else up.
Reality Check
December 16th, 2010
6:03 pm
Twelve million for five years to a player who will eventually be the Braves left fielder?
OVERPAID. But so are most major league players. I’m just glad it’s not my money go to waste.
Reality Check
December 16th, 2010
6:05 pm
Twelve million for five years to a player who will eventually be the Braves left fielder?
OVERPAID. But so are most major league players. I’m just glad it’s not my money going to waste.
Ryan
December 16th, 2010
6:06 pm
Uggla’s immediately the best offensive player on this team so I say give him the deal. The fact that he was able to drive in 100 runs once with the MARLINS is amazing. Give him deal.
Gman
December 16th, 2010
6:07 pm
It’s a good deal compared to other guys who have similar numbers. Yes. He has hit in 100 rbis only once, but he consistently hits between 80 and 90 rbis in his career. In 2010, no Braves player had more than 80 rbis. Dan had 105! No Braves player had over 21 home runs either. Dan had 33! He was the silver slugger award winner for 2nd base in 2010 and is a two-time All-Star! I agree with the posters that say this is not Chipper Jones money. Chipper would have made more elsewhere. Also consider inflation! Regarding fielding, Dan Uggla made more errors than other 2nd baseman (18) in the NL because he played the 2nd most games at 2nd base last year (158 games out of 162!). Only Weeks of Milwaukee played more games (159) at second base and he made 15 errors. On the flip side, Dan had the second most putouts (312) and assists (415) at second base in the National League. Brandon Phillips of the Reds and the 2010 Gold Glove winner had 281 putouts (21 less!) and 419 assists (only 4 more!). Phillips did, however, only have 3 errors all year. But Phillips is not as strong as an offensive presence,hitting only 18 home runs and 59 rbis. David Wright, former gold glover, had 20 errors at 3B this year! But he also had the most put outs and assists too and played in 158 games too! Wright hit 29 homers and 103 Rbi’s. I’ll take the extra rbi’s and home runs over the errors. But Maybe he can bring the errors down some in Atlanta! Remembering another 2nd baseman for the Braves, yes Brooks had many prominent errors in the playoffs, but without Brooks late game heroics during the regular season, we don’t make it to the playoffs!
tdog
December 16th, 2010
6:10 pm
It works for me. Now a free agent outfielder. Johnny Damon maybe? Magglio Ordonez?
tdog
December 16th, 2010
6:11 pm
I wonder if Prado could play center field.
Judy
December 16th, 2010
6:18 pm
I agree with MB, Wren has overreacted again, Uggla is a good fit, but we need to see how he works out in the short term. All last winter all we hear is the Braves could not make moves because most of the budget was tied up on a few players. Now we tie up 5yr an $61M on a 31 year old bad fielder. The Marlins had him for a number of years and would not sign him long term. He has pop, but in a year or so will be only usuable as DH, he will make our secondbaseman in the playoffs last year look like a gold glover. If Braves wanted pop they could of signed Dunn for 2 years. Its like KK and Lowe, next year at this time Braves will be trying to unload Uggla and will not have any takers with that contract tied to him.
Tired of nonsense
December 16th, 2010
6:22 pm
Sportswriter is stealing paychecks all day long writing this garbage. Please spend five minutes on your column next time .
Puma
December 16th, 2010
6:25 pm
Its a good deal for a guy who will hit 30 hrs/year for at least the next 2-3 years. His defense really is not that bad, I think people are overemphasizing that aspect of his game…its not that poor, its just average.
And BTW – Marlins tried to resign him four roughly the same money over 4 years..I think he wanted out of FL and who can blame him.
braveshoo
December 16th, 2010
6:28 pm
The Braves have young pitching but other than Heyward, McCann, and possibly Freeman, they have no young position players to build the team around. Uggla has averaged 30 HRs over the last 5 years, and is the only one of the above who hits RHed. He will take Chippers place, and is definitely worth 60 milllion for 5 years on todays market. I think its a very good move.
nene
December 16th, 2010
6:29 pm
60 million? wow no wonder the Ga mascot “uggla” left football for baseball
Fred Savage
December 16th, 2010
6:32 pm
Dan Uggla looks like the older brother from the Wonder Years
extremus
December 16th, 2010
6:33 pm
How about locking down Jason Heyward before he skips town? If he improves his offensive consistency and matures into a truly complete hitter over the next couple of seasons, the Braves will find it extremely difficult to keep him around for long.
The flip side of this is that I don’t like guaranteed contracts in sports; they’re risky and they’ve ruined pro sports as a whole but baseball especially is ridiculous with its player/agent avarice. If a guy lands a huge contract and then either gets hurt or just fails to deliver, the team and its fans are left in the cold. But as long as the system in baseball is what it is, the Braves should lock down as many of their young stars as possible before they hit arbitration.
Fred Savage
December 16th, 2010
6:34 pm
tdog- Magglio Ordonez just signed a 1 year deal for 10mil with the Tigers
Skeezix
December 16th, 2010
6:39 pm
All these guys are overpaid-but I’m glad the Braves have signed him to multi-years. I’m sick of the ‘one and dones’. Now if FW will ever get CF fixed. Please, not another season of watching McOut and his uppercut swing.
Duck Fan
December 16th, 2010
6:42 pm
Have you seen what guys are signing for these days. 30 homers seems like not bad by today’s standards. Trade Lowe! That is the blown money.
Ricky Pitino
December 16th, 2010
6:43 pm
Just because I’m out tom catting every night is no reason to blame me for getting embarrased by Drexel.
SF Braves Fan
December 16th, 2010
6:44 pm
Judy, in regards to: “If Braves wanted pop they could of signed Dunn for 2 years.”
Why would Dunn have accepted 2 years with the Braves when he got 4 with the White Sox? That doesn’t make any sense. Look at the contracts for Dunn, Werth, Crawford, etc– if you want to fill the holes on your team with good players from outside your organization, you have to be willing to offer them money and years, often more than you may think they are worth. The alternative is to sign reclamation projects and rejects.
And Uggla is nothing like KK– he is a proven major league talent. He has a career .349 OBP and .488 SLG. That isn’t going to disappear in a couple of years.
Najeh Davenpoop
December 16th, 2010
6:50 pm
Uggla may or may not be worth the money the Braves are offering him, but I’d rather see a trade acquisition stay here for more than one year for a change. And considering that the owners don’t seem likely to put up the cash necessary to bring in better players than him, might as well keep him around.
TheAntiMe
December 16th, 2010
6:51 pm
You know, Mark, I’m glad to see that you are branching out and writing comedy these days. it suits you well.
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
6:53 pm
I think that that MOST IMPORTANT decision that Fredo will HAVE TO MAKE (if he wants to do the right thing, instead of catering to the insatiable desire of so-called Braves fans)……is where to bat The Dipper in the batting order.
There is NO FREAKING WAY that The Dipper should be batting in the #3 slot of the order. The Dipper should be batting #6 or #7 in the order. Jason Heyward provides MUCH MORE SPEED and POWER than The Dipper does at this point in whatever career he has left.
This is what Fredo’s projected batting order should be (if based on expected production alone….along with whether a lefty or righty is on the mound):
1. Nate McLouth/Jordon Schafer
2. Martin Prado
3. Jason Heyward
4. Brian McCann/Dan Uggla
5. Dan Uggla/Brian Mccann
6. The Dipper/Alex Gonzalez
7. Alex Gonzalez/The Dipper
8. Freddie Freeman
In that line-up, The Dipper should not be batting any higher than 6th. However, if Fredo caves in to fan pressure, then expect to see The Dipper batting in his “welfare” spot in the order…..because The Dipper will be the most expensive “punch and judy” #3 hitter in baseball.
WTF!
December 16th, 2010
6:55 pm
What exactly has this guy done for the Braves to earn this?
jfreak13713
December 16th, 2010
6:58 pm
Nothing will please some of you people. Complian that the Brave don’t do enough then complain when you think they do too much. Jason Werth got over 100 million so I think 60 million is a fair deal for a RIGHT HANDED POWER HITTER. Is it the best deal the Braves could have gotten who knows but 60 million over five years for a guy who will hit 25+ homers a year sounds ok to me.
26.2
December 16th, 2010
7:00 pm
I’m not sure about the money but i would like to see Prado at 2nd and Uggla in LF come spring training.
SilentCC
December 16th, 2010
7:03 pm
Big and long contracts carry more potential for tears than for cheers. Once the big stuff is in the pocket, tell me — where… where is the incentive to work hard? It does not exist. Pride lasts only until things get real comfortable. Money IS the incentive — otherwise, players would stay right where they are, in a nice comfortable situation. And who is the poster child for that kind of move right now?
His last name is Werth. Left a World Series team to move to the bottom of the division for ….. mega $$$$$$$.
And once a lengthy contract is hanging on the wall it’s soooo easy for a player to have a couple of “off” years, why, it happens to everyone! It’s the owners that are the fools in this — that is NOT a good way to do business — usually. Which probably tips us all off that baseball is doing just fine — even in the lower levels of the league.
LivinInAL
December 16th, 2010
7:08 pm
I suppose we could stay with Brooks Conrad and save 12 million….. but if I remember correctly, his defense is not too good either.
K.C. Frenchy
December 16th, 2010
7:09 pm
In 2 years when Chipper & Lowe are off the books & hopefully we have a new owner we will be sittin pretty to be big buyers, the Phils pitching will be older & ours will be more experienced, then its time to start another long run of pennants, we have a great nucleus now! Go Bravos Ugga Ugga
Jt
December 16th, 2010
7:22 pm
Two things: (1) It’s not my money so it doesn’t bother me; and (2) he is probably going to produce 30 hr and 100 rbi for the next few years and in today’s market, that is pretty good price (see Carl Crawford). It is wise use of budget dollars.
P. Bull Terrier
December 16th, 2010
7:23 pm
Five years from now, when the Braves are paying a 35 year old Uggla $12 million on the last year of his contract, the Yankees, Red Sox, and Phillies will be lesser players $12 million per season to pinch hit.
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
7:25 pm
K.C. Frenchy……I agree with your 7:09pm post. $13 mil comes off the books after 2011 (McLousy and Kawacrappy)……and $37 mil after 2012 (Hudson, Lowe and The Dipper). Hudson would be the only one I’d re-sign, if he kept pitching like Tim Hudson.
However after 2012, Heyward and Hanson both become eligible for arbitration.
Hopefully Frank Wren will be smart and stay away from bad contracts (I dont see Uggla’s 5 year, $60 mil as being a bad contract). If Wren plays his cards right, the Braves will have a lot of cash to solidify the team either via a free agent OR via trade.
atlchris
December 16th, 2010
7:25 pm
Hey Mark. After reading your comments you got me thinking. Uggla may not be Chipper, but the 12 mil is good for this market. i do like it. However, it does mean that we need to expect to pick up a bat that will cost us $16 – $18mil. That is if we are to contend for the division.
Dap01
December 16th, 2010
7:26 pm
good deal.
Knowall Moreno
December 16th, 2010
7:28 pm
dawgfan, I have a inside source that works in the Bama athletic dept. that is best buds with Kirby Smart, hes already bought property in Athens for when the Dawgs come calling, if CMR has another rough year in 2011, HELLO Kirby! this is not rumor, its a FACT guaranteed. Merry Xmas to all Dawg fans, sic em WOOF WOOF!!!!!!!!!
K.C. Frenchy
December 16th, 2010
7:36 pm
Chris Chance, I think Huddy will end his career as a Brave, great guy & a bulldog on the mound, at least Lowe is NOW pitching like a #1, he was our best in September no doubt. If JJ comes back strong, I look for the FW to make a trade for an outfielder cause we all KNOW The Dipper will be on the DL with a boo boo, so Prado is our 3rd sacker, we still NEED a LF!!!!!!! I like Brett Gardner with the Yanks, good speed, young, & cheap. Go Bravos
TheAntiMe
December 16th, 2010
7:40 pm
WTF!
December 16th, 2010
6:55 pm
What exactly has this guy done for the Braves to earn this?
And just what exactly were you expecting him to do for the Braves being that he has played for the Marlins for the past 5 seasons?
What exactly did Carl Crawford and Adrian Gonzalez do for the Red Sox to earn their contracts? What exactly did Adam Dunn do for the White Sox to earn his contract?
I can tell you what exactly Dan Uggla did to the Braves in the past to earn this contract but if you can’t comprehend that players aren’t supposed to do things to help their opposing teams, particularly teams within their own division then it would just be entirely pointless.
Yeah, But
December 16th, 2010
7:44 pm
Uggla for 12 mil a year over five years. Well if you figure Chipper has averaged 122 games a year over the last five years vs Uggla averaging 155 games a year over the same period of time then Uggla for five years at 12 mil is probably a bargain considering what Chipper has made for playing 33 fewer games a year than Uggla over the same period of time.
Over the last five years Uggla has averaged 93 rbi and 31 HR per season. Chipper has averaged 76 rbi and 21 HR over the same period of time. Chipper has the edge in BA, but this team has proven that BA doesn’t necessarily lead to run production.
So based on the last five years performance, who do you think the Braves will be over paying for the next couple of years if Uggla gets an extension at 12 mil a year?
I didn’t make the initial comparison between Uggla and Chipper. The writer is who chose to use Chipper as the bar to measure Uggla by.
NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!!
December 16th, 2010
7:47 pm
NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!! NERDS!!! 42-34!!! 73-72!!!
bro
December 16th, 2010
7:48 pm
AJC writer, were you for the trrade or against it? You have got to make up your mind to be on one side or the other. I forgot that you guys just write whatever for the hell of it. No reason or cause for your little minds worth of words. Just something to create a problem.
mg
December 16th, 2010
7:56 pm
If it’s true that Uggla’s fielding % is around the same as Infante’s, then it appears that there is a wash in that department. Uggla’s power numbers fit the Braves’ need for right handed power. As one person opined, in this economic era 12 mil is not too far out of line. The fifth year is obviously a consideration considering his age but i believe he’ll at least be good for 3 or 4 good years.
In conjunction with extending Uggla,now is the time to deal Derek Lowe. I believe there is a market for him. I think the Braves would be selling high and setting themselves up for other moves. I believe the Yankees and less so the Rangers or other teams would be interested in dealing for Lowe. I believe it was Branch Rickey who believed in trading a player a year early and getting better value than holding on to that player for another year. Trade for prospects and payroll flexibility. Spin the prospects(without depleting our prospects) for a young right handed hitting center fielder (Cain of Brewers?). Possibly sign Soriano for 2 years or any experienced closer will do to strengthen bullpen and lessen burden on Kimbrel and Venters (no need to rush Medlen). A lockdown bullpen will positively affect all the starters.Give Beachy,Minor or (late in the year)Teheran starting roles. More money can be used to trade Kawakami or McLouth or both. Trading deadline deals become possible. Trading Lowe will make it harder on paper to compete this year but sets the team up to better compete in the near future. Arbitration or long term deals for Jair and Hanson would be less onerous. How much closer to the Phils will the team be with Lowe?Not to denigrate Lowe but I believe a strong bullpen will affect as many games as Lowe might win. I have respect for Lowe but I think now is a fortuitous time to deal him. I don’t think he’d mind going to the Yankees. The prospect to improve the team short and especially long term is available by making this trade at this moment. Clubs are looking for reliable innings eating playoff tested pitchers.Remind you of anyone? He only has 2 years left on his deal. Not a long term commitment for the acquiring team.
The trade gives the Braves flexibility in acquiring a quality shortstop next year if Gonzalez is let go. It gives Beachy, Minor and Teheran two years to develop while still keeping the team competitive. Remember it took Smoltz and Glavine a couple of years at the Major league level to develop. A strong bullpen allows for greater protection for them and the staff as a whole. Kris Medlen is in this picture. If needed, he can be installed in the rotation in 2012. There are many positives for the roster if the trade is made. Now is the time if there’s a deal out there. I firmly believe there is a team willing to make a deal.
If the price is right, I would also consider signing Derek Lee.I respect Freeman’s talent. But you give Freeman time to develop. A healthy Derek Lee would add another strong right handed bat to the lineup. Late innings matchup tactics for the manager would improve with no loss of defensive capability. As we have seen, Lee saved a lot of errors for the infield last year. If he would accept this role, a 2 year deal would be good for the team. I believe he would get more at bats than it would seem at first glance. I believe Fredi is like Cox in the sense that he finds at bats for his players. Matt Diaz being an example of what I think could be done with Lee.
The Braves would have more payroll available next year for a quality free agent. So many things possible so little comparable downside.
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
8:00 pm
K.C. Frenchy……..While it would be nice to see any production out of The Dipper in 2011, a part of me hopes that he stays hurt and cant play……so Fredo wont feel forced to put The Dipper in the #3 spot of the order.
Some Braves fans (and media types) keep wanting Chipper Jones to come back. However, Chipper Jones is long gone. What we have instead is The Dipper who is VASTLY OVERPAID, no range and terrible defense at 3rd……whose main contribution to the batting order is drawing walks (when batting #3 in the order requires MUCH MORE production like power and RBI’s).
KakNiqueTree
December 16th, 2010
8:11 pm
Amazing how so many folks here have such a hangup about ballplayers’ ages.
GovClintonTyree
December 16th, 2010
8:28 pm
Make the deal.
Christopher Chance
December 16th, 2010
8:30 pm
KakNique Tree…..I dont think that “age” is so much the issue…..as the ability of a player to not only produce BUT ALSO stay healthy…..IN RELATION to how much he is being paid….ALONG with how he is used (for instance, The Dipper hitting #3 in the batting order when healthy).
Real Braves fans want to see Fredo put the best time out there who are put in positions to produce and help us WIN………..we do not want to see Fredo play players to satisfy the insatiable need of so-called Braves fans who in fact are more loyal to certain players…then they are to the team.
It’s so-called Braves fans like those who could live with the Braves struggling…AS LONG as they get to see their favorite, over the hill, failing to re-live past glory, getting welfare playing time players play.
YES!
December 16th, 2010
8:49 pm
I am all for it, when is the last time a brave hit 30 pluse homers in season?
Don in Gwinnett
December 16th, 2010
8:50 pm
Sign him! Good grief, we have spent more on far less!!
MitchC
December 16th, 2010
8:58 pm
Mr Negative strikes again.
Mark, you know I like you, buddy, and I enjoy posting on your blog, but.. I remind you.. you are the same guy who predicted the 2010 Braves would finish, and I quote you.. “Bah humbug, third place”. I predicted they would win the wild card. Who was right?
Why must you look at the negative side of it? On one hand, all the AJC writers are all over the Braves for not spending money. Now, when they finally want to lock up a good, relatively young player, you’re all.. “It’s too much.., for too long”.
Think of it this way: Chipper, whether it’s now, or in a year or two.. is done. Our only power hitters besides Uggla are Mccann and Heyward. We need Uggla for our lineup going forward, especially when Chipper does hang it up.
12 mil for a hitter that can hit us 20 to 30 homers, and drive in 80 to 100 runs is not outrageous. While five years is a long time, we have had some success with five year contracts., IE. Greg Maddux.
I’m sorry, Mark, but I completely disagree with you on this one. I’d rather have a decent Uggla on the team for five years, then have a one and done guy like Tex was, who moved on, and is now producing for the Yankees.
I criticize FW, but I like this move. Hopefully, Uggla will stay healthy, but we know that can never be predicted. My feeling is, the Braves wanted to make sure they had a productive hitter in their lineup for a long time, and didnt end up trading away a lot for nothing. Signing Dan to a five year deal does this.
Don in Gwinnett
December 16th, 2010
8:59 pm
Right on, MitchC!
BravesfaninNashville
December 16th, 2010
9:03 pm
I don’t understand how so many posts here are so negative towards Frank Wren. Only 4 teams made the playoffs in the NL last year and the Braves were one of the four. In spite of losing Kris Medlin, Martin Prado, Chipper Jones and in the playoffs Billy Wagner we made a good showing and were one pitch away from having a 2-1 lead against the team that won the World Series. I place more blame on in game decisions for our elimination in the Playoffs than the players that were available on the roster with the budget Frank Wren has to work with. It’s hard not to love Bobby Cox as he was such a great players manager and got players to play hard and in many cases above their true talents just because they loved the man so much they wanted to please him. With that being said I am looking forward to the Fredi Gonzalez era. Frank Wren has rebuilt the pitching staff, kept all of our top prospects and landed a big right handed bat for the middle of the order in trade for a utility player and a pitcher that would have been our third lefty out of the pen. He has done all of that while absorbing the big dollars that Chipper is played to either not play or not play at the level the contract costs. Frank took so much heat from the many people on this blog for the way he handled Smoltz and Glavine at the end of their careers. Even though Boston gave Smoltz a very risky contract and ended up regretting it Wren took heat for not retaining Smoltz. It would have been a bad move to pay him $10 Million after his 4th major surgery. As Frank said at the time the Braves were willing to give John an incentive/performance based contract and were willing to pay Smoltz “to pitch” it’s just that the Red Sox were willing to guarantee the money and ended up paying him “not to pitch”. In the wake of that and Glavine’s exits he had to do something to prove he and the Braves weren’t heartless. So he signed Jones because he didn’t want another Braves future hall of famer finishing his career in another uniform.. He did what everyone wanted him to do at the time and now so many are wearing him out because he did just that. It’s kind of damned if you do damned if you don’t. The contract itself wasn’t bad assuming Chipper could still play at any decent level. I remember Chipper saying he wouldn’t hamstring this team with a contract if he couldn’t play at a high level anymore. I hope he meant that and would retire if he isn’t at least 90% in spring training. This is not Frank Wrens fault. I think signing Uggla to this deal makes all the sense in the world. He will over the next 5 years give us more offensive production than Jason Werth will the Nationals at a fraction of the price.
Naf Sevarb
December 16th, 2010
9:08 pm
Hey Mark,
You could have just wrote this: Who cares it Liberty’s money give him the dough and been done with this article. 12 mil is a deal with all the silly money being thrown around.
Naf Sevarb
December 16th, 2010
9:09 pm
Do it.
san diego dawg
December 16th, 2010
9:40 pm
No one can answer Mark’s question until late June or July. We will know by then. To question the man’s value to the team before he ever spits on home plate for the first time in a Braves uniform is a tad premature. Look, this is a legitimate right handed power bat who will hit between Chipper and McCann. If Chipper & McCann both increase production in power numbers and Uggla “only” hits 30 HR and “only” drives in 91-95 runs, then absolutely he is worth the money. If Chipper and McCann do not flourish with Dan batting between them, then Braves fans have a lot bigger problems to worry about than this $60 million question. Personally, I probably would have waited to do the extension if I were in charge. One can only hope getting this done early will bolster Dan’s confidence and keep him focused just on baseball once the season starts.
wide right
December 16th, 2010
9:48 pm
Personally, while of course I’d like to pay him less, i can see why Wren might agree to 5 years – 60MM. We havent had a right handed power guy hit over 30 HR’s since ‘06. Every year its what us Braves fans say we need and we havent had it for 4 years. Now we have one – at a relatively reasonable cost.
I’d prefer to have Jayson Werth in RF than Uggla at 2nd…but compare them over the last 3 seasons:
BA OBP SLG HRS
Werth – . 279 . .376 513 87
Uggla – 264 .361 493 96
Now i know Werth is better defensively…but i do consider Uggla to be average defensively and he does play a premium position. Uggla is a little younger. Still, Werth steals bases, etc….Werth is Worth more….but the guy just got 18MM a year for 7 years!!! RH power bats are at a premium and for FW to get a good one who hits great at Turner Field for less than half the long term commitment our division rival just paid Werth…i think it makes sense.
wide right
December 16th, 2010
9:50 pm
and when i wrote “i’d prefer to have Werth in RF” i didnt mean at the expense at JH. We are very well taken care of in right….JW could play a decent CF or a strong LF…but i hope you get my point.
Old Slugger
December 16th, 2010
9:54 pm
In light of the economy these salaries are obscene. No wonder tickets prices are out of reach of many (atleast the good seats)
James
December 16th, 2010
9:59 pm
Braves should have traded for Josh Willingham instead of letting the A’s get him he could have played in the outfield alongside Jason Heyward and Matin Prado.
Two UGA football players aid accident victim
December 16th, 2010
10:03 pm
With a name like Uga….Why not?
jed
December 16th, 2010
10:03 pm
it’s a good deal if you sign him to that contract only if he agrees to move to LF, so that prado can stay at second base. i hate the notion of playing uggla at 2b.
MiamiBrave
December 16th, 2010
10:10 pm
I’ve been watching Uggla for a number of years down here and trust me when I tell you that the Braves got a bargain especially compared to the money going to other top players this year. In all liklihood, he winds up at third after next year when Chipper retires and Prado goes back to second base. Now we just need one more 30+ HR corner OF type to put in the middle of the order and we should have a balanced lineup. Look for Wren to try and add someone like that next offseason when McLouth, KK, and Chipper hopefully come off the books. Maybe the yanks are getting desperate enough to give up Swisher for Lowe. Who knows?
K.C. Frenchy
December 16th, 2010
10:14 pm
Chipper should be in the 6 hole with J. Hey #3, Ugga cleanup & McCann 5th, Gonzo 7th, Freeman 8th, Prado perfect @ #2. That puts no pressure on Freeman to hit right away, but unfortunately leaves us with the McOut/Shafer prayer at leadoff, they both have speed but like the old timers say, you cant steal 1st base!!!!! The Dipper in the 3 hole is a HUGE mistake & really is giving Larry too much respect, yes he was MVP, but in what, 1999???? He gets on base & can still hit doubles but as far as power, hes DONE!!!!! I say hes hits about 12 dingers this year, & I bet Im not far off, Go Bravos
Joe Tess Fish House
December 16th, 2010
10:19 pm
What does it mater who they sigh. Braves mesed up by getting a loosing manager.
John
December 16th, 2010
10:23 pm
Which is worth more to society, a baseball player or a high school math teacher? That we have our priorities wrong is why we have so many problems.
Jim
December 16th, 2010
10:33 pm
I thought they traded too much for him when they gave up Omar……
J-Hey
December 16th, 2010
10:33 pm
“it isn’t your money. It’s Liberty Media’s”
why do I get the feeling if fans just stopped showing up to the ballpark, that would be worded differently?
Cale
December 16th, 2010
10:38 pm
Sounds like it should be Uggla making the move to left field instead of Prado if he’s really that bad on defense. As far as salary, the bottom line is that you have to spend this type of money to get a proven bat in the lineup these days. Otherwise, we have to get the washed up 38 year old like we normally get to fill the void for a year. Either way, I bet Uggla LOVES (*sarcasm) to be welcomed to Atlanta with these type or articles from our local paper.
willie
December 16th, 2010
10:47 pm
I agree with the posters that think $60 mill over 5 years sounds like a steal compared to the Werth deal.
kral
December 16th, 2010
10:50 pm
i’m on the Price is Right…I take that deal look forward to having him….Freddie has managed him..trust Freddie’s opinion of him as a 2b man…I am sure him a Wren conferred..
bob
December 16th, 2010
10:51 pm
Sounds like the going rate for his average performance. You eventually have to hitch your wagon to somebody. The Braves’ success in this decade will be decided by how well the next wave from the farm produce. For now they must eat the Chipper, KK & McLouth contracts.
zeke
December 16th, 2010
10:52 pm
NO! NO! HELL NO! IN FACT NOT ON SINGLE DAMN SO CALLED PROFESSIONAL ATHLETE IS WORTH WHAT THEY ARE PAID!!! RIDICULOUS! I WILL NEVER EVER BUY A TICKET!
kral
December 16th, 2010
10:55 pm
Cale do you know that martini a I like to call him is a dang good of. and uggla’s never played there…and fredie has stated he is confident with his df.. and you make a cutting remark and refer to markie’s article
Largo
December 16th, 2010
11:04 pm
You said Uggla isn’t Chipper and I say, Thank God for that!
jo jo
December 16th, 2010
11:30 pm
AT TODAYS PRICES HE WORTH THE 60 MIL.
Sam Alex
December 16th, 2010
11:31 pm
Hi Mark, First of all I have been a Braves fan since the Braves were in Boston plus I followed them very closely. Yes I do disagree with you and signing Uggla for 5 yrs at $60 million is a steal. You must of slept on the wrong side of bed. Come on Mark get a life.
Steve
December 16th, 2010
11:38 pm
I have absolutely no problems with signing Uggla to that amount.
For one, Nate McLouth has a 1.25 million club buyout after 2011 if we need to cut his $10.65 million salary.
For another, KK’s 6.7 million will be off the books next year.
Lastly, Chipper will only be around a couple more years, three if he reaches his vesting options by playing in enough games.
Most importantly, the Braves haven’t had a reliable right-handed hitter since Andruw was in his prime, and Uggla is actually better. It’s second base. If he can turn a DP and make routine plays, then we can get by. Let’s also not forget that he isn’t a one or two year wonder, but a legit 5 year stud.
Really..
December 17th, 2010
12:04 am
Mark, tell me how else you would acquire a player with Uggla’s production at this rate. Have you looked at the free agent signings lately? The cost of good players is going up, and we paid less than market value.
ugaaccountant
December 17th, 2010
12:10 am
This is a no-brainer yes in modern day baseball. You have to have guys like him on the team to compete.
Keith
December 17th, 2010
12:14 am
If we can get Uggla signed to a long-term deal, is this an indicator that Liberty is about to loosen Wren’s reigns? Not sure I spelled that correctly…
One can hope I guess.
GO BRAVES!
DawgDad
December 17th, 2010
12:21 am
It’s a stretch on dollars and term. If Uggla played second base like — Martin Prado — then this would have been a good risk. As is, they are paying premium prices for a defective product. Two big ifs have to materialize to make this pay:
1. Uggla has to average over 100 rbi’s a year for five years
2. He has to play somewhere besides second base, competently.
guy
December 17th, 2010
12:46 am
They’re all way overpaid!
Ryan
December 17th, 2010
1:00 am
Uggla’s not a cornerstone player, but $12MM isn’t cornerstone player money. Try $15MM+ for that. Baseball needs a salary cap.
Bryan
December 17th, 2010
1:59 am
The Phillies have maxed out their credit cards and what has that brought them? 4 straight playoff appearances and 2 world series appearances. I ask you, if DLowe, Chipper, and Uggla lead the Braves back to the playoffs, is it not worth it as a fan to see your team back in playoff contention after missing out for 4 out of the past 5 years?
I have to say it is worth it. The way I look at the Uggla trade and possible extension is this: We dropped Diaz (unfortunately, because he can still be productive off the bench) and Melky. Is moving Prado to LF all that bad? I don’t think so. In fact it might keep him a little more healthy because he won’t be diving on a hard infield. We added a big power bat into the middle of our line up which we have lacked for some time now. Our team has only gotten better by Uggla being traded here.
Chipper will be coming off the books in a year or two. In fact we will have quite a bit of money coming off the books (KK, DLowe, etc.) We may be able to go out and spend on a big FA to complement our core of young guys, Hanson, Heyward, Freeman, etc. Add Uggla to that list who should still be around 20+ home runs as a second baseman, which I remind you is rare in the game, and Uggla is worth every penny of a $60 million contract.
randybottoms
December 17th, 2010
2:08 am
wow…there really are some bonafide boneheads that post comments on here…. chipper’s on base % and club leadership make him worth what we pay him, and really kawakami was the only signing you could really say was a bad signing. mcclouth had great numbers in pittsburgh and wren made a great trade considering what we thought he would do. lowe will be fine next year-he looked great at the end of last season and he was lights out in the NLDS-we just had bad defense in that series. i think wren has done a good job with the resources he’s had which are mid level payroll-the people arguing this are whiners and just get mad whenever we don’t win the world series…and i bet they would still complain even then.
Bryan
December 17th, 2010
2:17 am
A lot of people have been arguing that the DLowe contract was bad, but he still has won 30+ games for us. Sure his ERA is up but 30 games is not bad. And I have said all along, if he gets us back to the playoffs, then the deal was worth it. And his strong finish got us into the playoffs.
Ted M
December 17th, 2010
2:51 am
The Hawks seem to have the pieces yet they stink.
MitchC
December 17th, 2010
2:52 am
Something else just crossed my mind, and while it may be unfair to compare eras.
I’m by no means saying that Dan Uggla is Greg Maddux, and maybe you can’t compare a hitter to a pitcher, but… thirteen years ago when Greg Maddux’s contract expired, at age 31, JS signed him to a five year, 57 million dollar deal. This is THIRTEEN years ago, for essentially the same money as we are paying Uggla. Greg, even though he was in his early thirties, had six pretty good years for us, after we have him the big money following the 97 season.. He may not have been Cy Young 1 something ERA Maddux anymore, but he was a solid 15 plus game winner. Greg Maddux’s two long term contracts, not to metion the 16 mil we spent on him in 2003 to keep him, were probably the best money this team ever spent.
Again, I’m not comparing: Different era, different player, Maddux will be in the Hall in 2014, Uggla probably wont ever get there. My point is, to get good talent, you have to pay. The Yankees might have given Uggla 15 to 20 mil a year, who knows? You also have to look at need. This team needed another power hitter. Chipper is either done, or a shadow of himself.
I hope I’m not rambling. I’m just trying to make points. Oh, and it is 3am here, so I’m a bit loopy, lol. I just want to illustrate the point that, all things considered, between the Braves need for a power hitter, the market of what a similar power hitter might cost, and the fact that we gave out expensive long term contracts, more than a decade ago, that worked well, this deal might well turn out fine, and may not be the downside that Mark seems to be making it out to be.
JP
December 17th, 2010
2:55 am
Weird POV, Mark. You sound like my grandmother complaining about the cost of … well … ANYTHING. She’s always shocked by how much the price has risen in the last 15 years.
$12 million a year for Uggla is not bad at all. It’s not a steal, but it’s a solid price for the Braves to be able to lock up a perennial 30-HR guy. When so many guys are mercenaries demanding 7-year, 9-figure deals from whoever will pay it, it’s refreshing to see a guy like Uggla be willing to commit for less.
BravesfaninNashville
December 17th, 2010
3:28 am
Mitch C…. I agree that Uggla is a really good deal considering everything you said and the several $100 Million dollar contracts that are out there now. Werth, Zito, Veron Wells. Carlos Lee in Houston is in that group too and he made $19 Million last year to hit .246 with 24 Hrs and 86 Rbi in 605 plate appearances. He plays less than average defense in LF. The Braves are going to lock up Uggla for around 1/2 of most of these contracts and IMO he’s a better player than all of them except Werth and thats a push IMO. Werth’s contract is going to be a bad one as he’ll make over twice what we’ll pay Uggla and won’t produce more offensively. He’s a plus defender but he’s getting older and won’t be worth the money at the end of that contract.
Really..
December 17th, 2010
3:34 am
Christopher Chance…Chipper has been worth his new contract and more. His 2007 and 2008 years were monstrous, and thought the last 2 years haven’t been great, he’s still provided some decent production. Not to mention his leadership or marketability.
To all you others flaming this contract..If this Uggla deal gets done..it’s a good signing in this market. Period. You are not getting similar production on the free agent market for anywhere near this price.
Christopher Chance
December 17th, 2010
5:31 am
randybottoms………your 2:08am post about The Dipper being worth “what we pay him” because of his OBP and leadership is way off the mark. $13 mil for drawing walks and being a good leader? Wow. Amazing. We’re paying a little less than 1/6th of our payroll on someone who draws walks? You really think that The Dipper is worth $13 mil?
If the Braves werent wasting over $26 mil on The Dipper, McLousy and Kawacrappy….then I wouldnt trip so much on Derek Lowe. However, the Braves could still use some more offense…..and the only way to free up some payroll would be by trading Derek Lowe to a team like the Yankees who are in desperate need of starting pitching AND who can afford to absorb Lowe’s $15 mil salary. In turn, Frank Wren could allocate that $15 mil to get another bat.
Formul8or
December 17th, 2010
5:32 am
This is a steal. The guy is more productive than Jayson Werth and this is $6 million a year less. Any 30 HR power hitter is worth $12 million
Christopher Chance
December 17th, 2010
5:41 am
Really……I cant believe that you actually said in your 3:34am post that The Dipper was worth the 3 year, $42 mil contract extension that he signed early 2009. The Dipper was nothing but a punch and judy hitter who drew some walks in the half of season that he played in 2009.
I’m tired of hearing the “he’s a good leader” crap. When I pay my $150 to watch the Braves on Direct TV’s MLB Extra Innings package…..I could care less about who is a good leader in the locker room. I want to see players on the field who can actually PRODUCE.
Having The Dipper bat #3 in the batting will not help the Braves offense get the most production they are capable of producing.
At least Boobie Cox is gone. In two years, The Dipper will be gone……meaning that hopefully those “past their prime, living off of past glory fumes” Braves will be gone, leaving those who actually are capable of coaching the quality players who deserve to play.
Christopher Chance
December 17th, 2010
5:43 am
If the 5 year, $60 mil contract is finalized…..it will be a really good deal for the Braves.
Heyward should bat #3, and Uggla and McCann should flip flop the #4 and #5 spots in the order, depending on whether a righty or lefty is starting. There is NO FREAKING WAY that The Dipper should be batting any higher than #6 in the order.
the real Old Gold
December 17th, 2010
6:23 am
Chipper Jones is a part-time player and the Braves continue paying him! It’s time Chipper took one for the team and walk away!
Christopher Chance
December 17th, 2010
7:13 am
the real Old Gold…….there is NO FREAKING WAY that The Dipper is going to walk away from $13 mil each (plus $1 mil bonus each) in 2011 and 2012.
All this talk of “The Dipper taking one for the team” if he continues to struggle….is all that it is…..talk designed to placate simple minded Braves fans who want to continue worshiping The Dipper.
The Dipper struggled in both 2009 AND 2010. He’ll be 39 by Opening Day. I seriously doubt that he’s going to come anywhere close to being productive again. His body is breaking down.
Yet his $13 mil salary…along with him batting #3 in the batting order AND his bad defense at 3rd….will hurt us on the field the next two years.
papadawg
December 17th, 2010
7:18 am
Complain when the Braves don’t open the checkbook and sign players and complain when they do. Some fans & sports writers just can’t be satisfied
Maggie Saunders
December 17th, 2010
7:24 am
Do ya really think Chipper could’ve made it with the Yanks? How long would that wife cheater had stuck around when the NY papers talked about his shoddy defense? Not long.
Mike
December 17th, 2010
7:28 am
If you are tired of the one and done players, what else could they do. It is either sign him or see him go and we lose on another trade. Maybe we need to develop some bats in the minors to go with the pitching.
papadawg
December 17th, 2010
7:31 am
Lightly pencil Chipper on the lineup card everyday
Joe Simpson
December 17th, 2010
7:32 am
I’d rather have Infante back.
Jdiddy
December 17th, 2010
7:35 am
Considering players like Werth ($18M/yr for 7 years at almost age 32), Lilly ($11M/yr for 3 years at age 35), and even Magglio Ordonez ($10M/yr coming off season ending injury and is 37) are getting huge money this offseason, this contract would be a steal. I’d implore you to find a more durable second baseman with as much power as Uggla. How about you check out his career numbers at Turner Field? How about you consider looking at the people batting in front of him in FLA when he “never drove in 100 runs” or the ballpark he played 81 games a season in? Jayson Werth never batted .300 and has only hit 30 hrs once in his career and look at what he got. How about next time you do some research before you give your pointless and baseless opinions about yet another sport you know nothing about. I wish the AJC would leave baseball to DOB since you don’t even seem qualified to write for a high school newspaper.
ATLfan15
December 17th, 2010
7:58 am
@papadawg, 7:18am: excellent post, agree 100%!!
gadawgs
December 17th, 2010
8:00 am
Yes, yes I would!! The guy rakes at Turner Field. Power hitting second baseman for 12 per is money well spent.
longtimefan
December 17th, 2010
8:09 am
I am amazed at most of the comments. I assume most are casual fans,12 yrs old,don’t understand the economics of the game or are just trying to get a rise out of people. If Chipper thinks his knee is OK, i’ll take him at third base batting with the game on the line any day. The Uggla deal is a no brainer. 30/90 for a middle infielder? Proven over 5 years. Plays every day. No history of injury. More HRs first 5 years than any major league middle infielder in history. FW has done an outstanding job keeping the Farm pitching talent intact while putting a contender on the field. Lowe has won 15 games the first 2 years of his contract. Name the other pitchers with more wins. KK is a relative bust but name a GM who bats 100%. Twenty straight years of fielding a team capable of winning it all and major league SPORTS record of 14 straight division/playoff appearances and STILL some of you complain. What does it take to make you happy?
Joey
December 17th, 2010
8:10 am
Has Uggla missed any games with an ingrown toenail, tweeked hammy, pulled bicep, pulled oblique, strained wrist, strained thumb, and on and on?
If not, he may be a bargain for the Braves, who have witnessed uknowwho sit for weeks at the time with injuries so petty, that John Smoltz finally went to the press to call him out on it.
Poorbrave
December 17th, 2010
8:26 am
I think its a great deal. But where is the power OF’er that Wren has promised for three years.
Merry Christmas Braves Fans.
Poorbrave
December 17th, 2010
8:27 am
Does he have a no-trade in contract?
An Adult
December 17th, 2010
8:28 am
Extolling rawdawg for being first is pathetic Mark. That boils down to either someone unemployed hanging on the computer to sniff your writer’s jock until your blog appears OR some pathetic kid that also needs to get a life OR someone’s employee screwing the dog on company time. Regardless, not something for ANYONE to be proud about and something you shouldn’t promote….. just write you blog, reply and be happy some people care what you think.
Bill Meyer
December 17th, 2010
8:51 am
I say go with it…Dan may not be the greatest fielder but I think he gets a bum rap
.Jason Werth 7 yrs please.at $126M no one is worth that..and some of these other free agents,one who batted .190 recvd I believe $4M
BM
BamaBrave
December 17th, 2010
9:07 am
I Say get it done. Please dont listen to some of these never happy so called fans!
jarvis
December 17th, 2010
9:13 am
Moose, Rocco, help the judge find his wallet.
gator32301
December 17th, 2010
9:22 am
i don’t think any contract decisions should be based on empty statistics like batting average and RBIs
Matty D
December 17th, 2010
9:26 am
I have to disagree here mark. Uggla is one of the premier power hitters in the majors. The 30’s are typicaly the peek years for power hitters (Andruw Jones excluded). I think he’s worth the money.
TB
December 17th, 2010
9:26 am
It’s probably worth it, but they could always counter with something like $12.5 million for 4 years with a club option 5th year for $15 million. That’s a win-win situation for bothe the team & the player.
Rob
December 17th, 2010
9:30 am
This guy will be a positive player for this team….his bat will offset his range at second base. And he is a steady clubhouse guy. For the money in this crazy market…yes he is worth it. The BIGGER concern is Freddy Freemen’s potiential and CHIPPER at third……
skip
December 17th, 2010
10:22 am
Five years and $60 million. If the Braves make that deal they are going to end up with an untradable player in about three years.
Naf Sevarb
December 17th, 2010
11:12 am
Good deal for both. Lets sign it and talk about something else like who is playing center field for us
Naf Sevarb
December 17th, 2010
11:13 am
Uggla will have a better year than Werth. bet the house.
Christopher Chance
December 17th, 2010
11:30 am
longtimefan………….The Dipper replaced Chipper on the Braves in early 2009 (shortly after he signed the 3 year, $42 mil extension).
I’m a “longtimefan” who loved seeing Chipper Jones hitting in the #3 spot in the order and hitting in clutch situations.
However, I do not want to see The Dipper hitting in the #3 slot of the batting order…nor do I want to see him hitting in clutch situations.
Chipper Jones hit for a high average, drew walks, hit for power and knocked in runs. The Dipper hits for “average” at best and draws walks.
The Dipper is a rich man’s version of Greg Norton.
Brave New World
December 17th, 2010
11:59 am
longtimefan: Your intelligent comments make far too much sense for the average cretin on these blogs. I am particularly impressed with your understanding that Derek Lowe has been a very positive addition to The Braves the last 2 years. 15 and 16 win seasons, going deep into most games, and carrying The Braves in September and into the play offs in 2010 should get more respect from Braves fans who claim to know the game of baseball. BTW, Derek Lowe at $15 million per season makes a bunch more sense than Cliff Lee at $24 million per season.
Chopper
December 17th, 2010
12:30 pm
Mark Bradley,
I’ve seen some stupid postings from you before, but this might take the cake.
Here are some comparables for Dan Uggla and a recent big time free agent signing, call him Player A.
Uggla
30 years old
ML Career Numbers in 5 seasons
OPS = .837
HR = 154
RBI = 465
Player A
31 years old
ML Career Numbers in 8 seasons
OPS = .848
HR = 120
RBI = 406
Uggla is likely to sign for 5 years at $60 million per the report. Player A signed for 7 years at $126 million. You may have guessed that Player A is Jayson Werth.
So I’d say if the Braves can sign Uggla for the reported deal, they are getting a better offensive player than the Nationals are getting for half the price. Uggla may be lacking defensively compared to Werth, but he’s not worth half as much based on defense.
Mark Bradley failed to do the research that Frank Wren and the Braves obviously did.
Chopper
December 17th, 2010
12:35 pm
Oh and Bradely says something about Uggla only reaching 100 RBI’s once in his career. Well neither Jayson Werth or Carl Crawford have had a 100 RBI season ever, and only over 90 RBI once each. Uggla has gone over 90 RBI four times in his career, and hit over 30 HR four times. Werth has hit over 30 HR once and Crawford has never done it. But yet both scored deals well over $125 million and Bradley is complaining that Uggla might get $60 million?
Give me a break. why does the AJC employ such morons when there are literally thousands of people who could write better sports columns?
Art
December 17th, 2010
12:55 pm
You better believe that I think the Braves need to keep Uggla for 5 or 6 or 7 years as he has the chance of being the other face of the Braves besides McCann after Chipper retires. He is also a good right handed hitter that the Braves have not had for YEARS and he is local from Tennessee and that could help draw a few fans too. Sign him and keep him. At least the Braves will not have to face him either.
Christopher Chance
December 17th, 2010
12:57 pm
Brave New World……..In the past two years, Derek Lowe has ZERO complete games in 67 games started, averaging 5 2/3 innings per start..with an ERA of 4.33
Cliff Lee has 13 complete games in 62 starts the past two years….averaging almost 7 1/3 innings per start…with an ERA of 3.20.
Cliff Lee SAVES a team’s bullpen.
I’d take Lee at $24 mil over Lowe at $15 mil.
Nickgranite
December 17th, 2010
1:19 pm
Considering Carl Crawford has never hit 20 homers much less 30 or reached 100 RBIs and is getting paid over 20 million a year, this doesn’t seem like a bad deal to me.
P Rose
December 17th, 2010
1:23 pm
HELL yes. Uggla was the best slugger out there, and the Braves desperately needed a slugger, and they got one. He is The Man. He’s from Tennessee, he grew up a Braves fan, he wants to be here and he’s happy. Wren should get this deal done NOW.
Headley Lamar
December 17th, 2010
2:09 pm
Chipper Jones is worth every penny the Braves have ever paid him.
You see dummies baseball is a business. The Braves are out to make money.
Whatever they have paid Chipper over the years he has made that back for the team and then some.
lalalalalala
December 17th, 2010
2:54 pm
I’d take McClouth over Werth becuase he’s cheaper (at least following the logic on this blog)
coach13
December 17th, 2010
2:59 pm
12 mil a year to a guy who hits 30 HR and 100 RBI a year?!?!? Uhhhhh yeah!!!!
stupup74
December 17th, 2010
3:06 pm
Stupid, stupid, stupid. The braves are 2 years from getting out from under Lowe’s and Chipper’s contracts. You got Prado. Keep him at 2b and use this money to find some OF help.
vermont 39
December 17th, 2010
3:09 pm
look at it another way…Chipper is getting Uggla money…not such a bad deal now!!!
coach13
December 17th, 2010
3:09 pm
Headley- he hasn’t hit 30 HR since the 04 season and has only driven in 100 RBI once since 03. With his 14 mil a year we could sign a quality player who is going to produce and help this team win.
coach13
December 17th, 2010
3:12 pm
stupup74- why not sign him long term and move Prado to 3rd? Then you still use all that money to go get a big bat in the OF? You aren’t going to get 30/100 very often for that price. THe Nationals just paid 4 mil more than that for Werth. Their numbers are pretty comparable.
Brave New World
December 17th, 2010
3:31 pm
Christopher Chance:December 17th, 2010 12:57 pm
Brave New World……..In the past two years, Derek Lowe has ZERO complete games in 67 games started, averaging 5 2/3 innings per start..with an ERA of 4.33 Cliff Lee has 13 complete games in 62 starts the past two years….averaging almost 7 1/3 innings per start…with an ERA of 3.20.
Cliff Lee SAVES a team’s bullpen.
I’d take Lee at $24 mil over Lowe at $15 mil.(Sorry, Chris old boy, the Phillies got there before you did.)
MitchC
December 17th, 2010
3:35 pm
Christopher, I agree with you, but.. unfortunately, we signed Lowe to that deal.. and now.. we just have to take what we can get.
Lowe has been a very lucky pitcher the last two years. The Braves score runs when he’s on the mound. He won 15 games last year with a 4.67 ERA, and another 16 this year with a 4.00 ERA. Poor Tommy Hanson had a 3,33 ERA, and was sub 500 at 10-11.
Anyhow, not to get sidetracked. Back to the point of Mark’s article. Unfortunately, the Braves are not a top level payroll team which will attract free agents like Maddux anymore. It’s all about.. not to quote Cuba Gooding in Jerry Maguire, but.. “Show me the money”. Yes, Cliff Lee took “less” from the Phillies to join what might be one of the best rotations ever assembled, but.. that is rare nowadays.
I don’t know what choice the Braves really had in this matter. We are trying to rebuild into a playoff team, after four years of mediocrity. Somewhere, you have to show that this cheapskate ownership is going to spend money.
Maybe it’s the riverboat gambler in me, but.. I say this was probably the best the Braves could do. We need a power hitter who wont bolt from us after one year like Tex did, with Chipper on the decline, and on the way out, and Mccann and J Hey our only power threats. Sometimes, you have to make choices in baseball. The Braves are doing that.
Honestly, we wont be able to assemble a really potent lineup, until Chipper retires. I respect all he has done for the Braves, but. we can take his 10 to 15 mil, when he does hang it up, and put it into a younger, more productive hitter.
The 2011 Braves should be better than 2010, if all are healthy. We arent Philly, but, as I said before, we are about the next best team in the NL.
ShaunC
December 17th, 2010
4:06 pm
Jason Heyward can be that guy. This is just another cog in the wheel.
UKUGA
December 17th, 2010
4:18 pm
Of course it’s reasonable.
It’s still less than Chipper Jones money, and Chipper is playing for a “discount.”
In 2015, the final year of this deal, $12 million won’t be the $13 million Chipper Jones made in 2009. Think about it . . .
Heyward is cheap.
Freeman is cheap
Hanson is cheap.
Jurrjens is cheap.
Chipper and McLouth are in the final year of their respective contracts.
McCann is signed.
This is the guy to sign. He’s in the fold. He wants to be a Brave. He could probably get more elsewhere.
Show me an alternative, rather than simply criticizing the signing.
Warren Spahn
December 17th, 2010
4:19 pm
Chipper has done a lot for the Braves through the years. However, Henry Aaron did much more. I don’t hear anyone wanting to bring Henry back to play rightfield. Chipper, like Henry, has his productive days behind him. The team would benefit if Chipper would retire.
8dogman
December 17th, 2010
6:43 pm
I will tell you what I think about paying Uggla 12 million dollars a year. I think it is dumb. I don’t think any baseball player is worth that kind of money. The players and their agents are nothing but money hungry rogues trying to get all they can bilk out of the owners and the price to see a game has gone through the roof. The Phillies seem to have unlimited funds these days and other stupid teams are getting into the act making these already enormous salaries go through the roof. I would like to get back to the good old days when players actually earned their salaries from year to year. If you had a good year you got a raise. Players have no loyalty these days. They are just in baseball for all they can bilk out of owners no matter who the owner is. I use to love watching baseball but now I very rarely watch a game since the players no longer want to play for the fun of it. They are just trying to get rich and that stinks! The owners could break the back of these agents and money hungry overpaid players if they just refuse to sign any free agents and I wish they had the nerve and guts to do it but the Yankees, Red Sox and Phillies won’t let than happen with their unlimited resources.
8dogman
December 17th, 2010
6:50 pm
I totally agree with Warren Spahn @4:19. Chipper has been a good player but his best days are behind him. We need more players like Hank Aaron who earned him pay every year not these bums we have playing now just to get rich and owners dumb enough to give them all this money.
It's over
December 17th, 2010
10:59 pm
Spending 12 million a year on a spotty hitter with no glove is ridiculous. I think when you strive for mediocrity instead of locking up solid ball players, you get mediocre results. There were studs out there for the picking. The Phillies got better overnight by picking up Lee, thereby taking a big load off of their bullpen, and their hitters will be energized and will not repeat their collective slumps after numerous injuries from last year. They will not miss Werth, who was a disaster with runners in scoring position. I think the Braves have a h*ll of a hill to climb.
MitchC
December 18th, 2010
1:27 am
UKUGA, not to burst your bubble, but.. all the guys you are saying will be “cheap”, will be eligible for either artbitration, or free agency, by the time your hypothetical team in 2015 rolls around. All the guys you mentioned are going to either get raises, or be with other teams.
We have to worry about 2011. This was a good deal for us now. Lowe’s contract will be off the books in two more years, so will Hudson’s, even though Huddy didnt cost us an exhorbant amount of money.
The big question for the Braves is Chipper, in terms of talent, production, and money. Can he come back? What will he give us if he comes back, and, if he can’t come back, what can we get if we use the money we paid him.
I think Chipper will play in 2011. After that, I’m not sure. I know all about his contract.. but.. something tells me that if he plays a fair amount of games, say 120-130, and doesnt produce that well, he may hang it up after 11. The good thing now is that Uggla, Mccann, and J Hey are our three most counted on run producers. Chipper can hit 10 to 15 homers, and drive in 70 runs, and that would suffice.
Hopefully, all the pieces will come together.
fieldofdreams
December 18th, 2010
7:34 am
They won’t keep him otherwise, Mark. There are too many teams out there willing to pay him big money. In the post steroid age guys who hit even 25 homers command this kind of money.
MJ
December 18th, 2010
10:01 am
I’m not sure that a 31 year old 2nd baseman can hit at the same power pace for the next 5 years. But desperate people do desperate things. The Braves need power hitting. I’m a huge CJ fan, and hope he can come back healthy to finish an incredible Hall of Fame career. I feel like we traded too much for Uggla as we did a few years ago for Texiera. I hate seeing the best yong shortstop in the game playing alongside the best young closer in Texas, knowing both were Braves, and we gave them up for Tex. Let’s hope it all works out guys. By the way, I know I’m going to get negative comments for saying this, but all you Chipper bashers need to lay off. The guy is dinged up, and yes he has been hurt in years past. But don’t forget who he is, and what he has done for this team. First of all, he’s going into the Hall fo Fame. Second, he is loyal – don’t think he could not have tested freee agency over the years and signed elsewhere for alot of money. Third – he is a team leader, and has set an example of how to play the game for every young player coming up. Lastly – the guy wants to end his career on his terms, not on an injury. If he can come back, give him support and let him finish his career with respect and dignity. He’s given us great play over the years, don’t forget that.
UKUGA
December 18th, 2010
10:33 am
MitchC,
You didn’t burst any bubble, you merely didn’t follow what I was saying.
I was making two separate points. Chipper made $13 million in 2009. Uggla will make $12 million in 2015. That’s a small difference in dollars, but a long period of time. It was to counter Bradley’s point that Uggla makes almost “Chipper Jones” money. Chipper made that money at a “discount”. Uggla turned down similar money from Miami. We got a good deal.
My other point is that we have some players that are going to be cheaper over the next few years, while some other high dollar contracts fall off.
Chipper, McLouth & KK expire in 2011, Lowe expires in 2012. Having Uggla signed into 2015 will not be a huge drag on our payroll, because we are entering a period of increased payroll flexibility.
Will something be done about our young arms? Sure, it is likely that JJ or Hanson is not extended as a Brave. So be it.
But today, we have guys expected to produce heavily in 2011 (Heyward, Freeman, Prado, Hanson, JJ) that are not expensive.
2015 is a long way away. We can afford to do this now, and still have flexibility as we move to 2012 and beyond.
Once Chipper (injuries), McLouth (disappearing act), and KK (failed experiment) come off the books a lot of doors open up for the Braves.
The fact that we pulled off the deal we did for Uggla was pretty amazing, considering what the Braves have had to do to acquire a bat ever since Gary Sheffiled left town.
Joshua
December 18th, 2010
12:27 pm
Let’s see…$12 million per year for a premiere power hitting 2nd baseman…Yea I think that is a no brainer there. Any team in MLB would sign Uggla for that with no questions asked.
BravesfaninNashville
December 18th, 2010
1:26 pm
MJ……. Totally agree on your points on Chipper. He has been loyal when he could have left for more money than the Braves have paid him. The Braves owe is to him to let him end his career on his terms. His will to play at a high level again could be a great thing for the Braves this summer. I think it helps him too to know that this team could be really good and that he doesn’t have to carry so much of the weight himself. The pitching is sound and the lineup should be pretty balanced . He could hit 2nd or 6th and really not have as much pressure on him as in the past. I’m with you in respecting who he is and what he has meant and will mean to the Braves long after he retires.
BravesfaninNashville
December 18th, 2010
1:34 pm
I like Chipper either as a #2 hitter and a table setter and see him go back to his approach of 2009 when he won his batting title. He turned a lot of good pitchers pitches into opposite field singles and took a lot of walks. He just used his natural hitting ability to put the ball in play and was on base a ton. That would make things great if Heyward, Uggla, and McCann where hitting behind him. They could also use him in the 6th spot with McLouth leading off followed by Prado, Heyward, Uggla, McCann and then Jones. This would leave him in a similar role where he could drive in some runners on base just by making good contact. In effect he would be extending rallies and not having to be the big cog in the rally like he was in the past. It would be the best thing for the team if he can come back healthy enough to play 130 plus games and be the singles, doubles hitter he was in 2009. He’d be a great table setter.
Bill
December 18th, 2010
3:31 pm
We/the fans have been knocking the Braves and Wren for not doing enough to make the Braves better. We need to give them credit for the move to get and sign long term Uggla. With a top line of starting pitching, the Braves need a right handed power hitter to help the offense and thats what they got. I would only question the 5 years, however, thats the way it is in today’s market. Hats off to Wren and the Braves for the move.
Chief pitchanono
December 18th, 2010
4:26 pm
Yes! Yes! Yes! If the braves are gonna compete we have to pay for it sometimes, and with the current stat of the Braves offense, this is a deal they need to get done. This helps for the present and the future. The Lowe and kawakami deals were bad deals, but made out of desperation, because we had no pitching to speak of at the time. We can’t go through this again on offense. Chippers last contract was a bad deal, but it was made to save face with fans and not to have aother ugly, smoltz, glavine situation. Chipper is not a apart of the Braves future, except that he will free up enough money to be able to replace him, while actually improveing the team. Lowe is being paid #1 starter money and is barely needed as fouth or fifth starter. The good news is that his contract is up soon and we have plenty of cheap replacements for him, so he too will free up a chunk of money that can be used to improve the offense. Kawakami and Mclouth (if he continues to stink) will also free up even more money. So the good thing is Wren should have plenty of money next off season to improve the offense and still have great pitching. Geting this deal done with Uggla before he is a free agent will be a good start.
Ross
December 18th, 2010
5:37 pm
Everything is relative. Who has a better chance of hitting 30 home runs, and driving in 100 runs in 2011, Uggla or Chipper? That one wouldn’t even be on the board in Vegas. So the answer is “yes”, he is worth at least what Chipper is going to make next year.
Mfree
December 18th, 2010
11:52 pm
If you don’t pay it, you won’t get him to stay. Simple as that. Doesn’t matter if the fans think he is worth it or not.
BravesfaninNashville
December 19th, 2010
3:44 pm
Hey just a thought……. we can sign Uggla for $60 Million for 5 years and Adrian Beltre is probably going to sign for $70 Million. The Braves could have had BOTH of them for $130 Million. The Nationals just signed Jason Werth for $132 Million. We could have had 50+ Homers 180+RBI and Gold Glove Defense at 3rd base. I know Chipper is not moving to 1b but if he would consider doing that it could help the Braves immensely. This move to me makes a lot more sense than any team paying Jason Werth the money he got. The Nationals WILL regret that contract.
Davis
December 19th, 2010
5:58 pm
I am tired of the Braves fans and SO CALLED beat writers that bitch about every move Wren makes. We have a top 3, 2B. If Wren traded for Jesus Christ himself, I think you guys would complain.
stew
December 19th, 2010
6:02 pm
Worth every penny of the sixty million. 30 hrs from one player we haven’t had in a long time and he’s right-handed. We had no chance in the off season against the Giants. We got no homers out of 3B/SS/2B/1B Lee had 3 hrs since joining Braves/RF J-Hey did nothing/CF three stooges/and LF. Catcher was the only position where that was a possibility. Now, if Chip’s healthy and Freddie pans out we have 1B/2B/3B/RF/ and C as possible home run hitters. Uggla gives us a legitimate 3-4-5 hole.
Netherland Brave
December 20th, 2010
3:40 am
I can’t even stand the thought of losing him to the free agent market next year. Please Braves, do what ever it takes.
bvillebaron
December 20th, 2010
12:11 pm
Yes, this is a no brainer. By the way, Uggla is not a “lousy” fielder but an average one unless all of you Infante fans feel that he is a lousy fielding too secondbaseman (Uggla fielding % is .980 and Infante’s as a secondbaseman is .981).
Old Sport
December 20th, 2010
12:42 pm
ALL our current power (if any) comes from the lefty group. You can not win like that…..therefore multiple years for the righty who can hit em’ out and drive em’ in!
jason
December 20th, 2010
12:46 pm
fielding percentage 2010 Uggla 976, Infante 960 and Prado 958 DOB what am I missing here?? Why are we so down on Uggla? He is the best hitter on our team(although I feel Heyward will be soon). 12 million a year is not that bad for a durable slugger
nique
December 20th, 2010
3:21 pm
I’m fine with the Bravos signing him for that much $$$. Look at what Werth is getting. If he hits 30hrs a year and drives in just under 100 RBIs (remember he was on the Marlins all these years), it’s worth it.
ABravesFan
December 20th, 2010
5:14 pm
It’s an okay deal if the 5 year include this coming year (so only 4 more year past this season). Once Uggla moves away from second base, his value drops quite a bit. Best case scenario is 3 or 4 of his prime and 1 okay year at the end there. Personally, I would have wait and see although there is some comfort for both him and us fan to know that he won’t be an one year rental.
RichieRich86
December 20th, 2010
9:09 pm
This is probably the worst article I’ve read. We stole Uggla from the Marlins for a super utlity player who isn’t an everyday player and was going to be coming off the bench again and a young left handed reliever who really didn’t have a role in our bullpen. Then we are going to get him for 5 years for 60mil. For what the Nats paid werth we are getting a major discount. Get a clue Bradley Uggla is the Man!!!
MitchC
December 20th, 2010
10:08 pm
Okay,. UKUGA, I’m sorry I misunderstood your point. I will say that now that I do understand what you are saying, I agree with you.
MitchC
December 20th, 2010
10:15 pm
Okay, I just scanned all the replies here very carefully, including Mr Bradley’s posts. I make this post knowing this question hasn’t been answered, so.. here it is.,
Mark is arguing that 60 mil is an exhorbant amount to pay Uggla for five years. Mark is saying Uggla’s defense isnt worth it, and apparently, his offense doesn’t make up for the defensive liability that Mark is arguing Uggla will be.
Mark, you fail to address one important point: If you think 60 mil is too much to pay Uggla for five years, then.., what move (s) would you make to shore up this offense? We know that Chipper is on the downside, and we need a power hitter to go with JHey and Mccann. Who, persay, can we get who would be a reliable source of power for our lineup? Or… if Mark is saying 12 mil a year is too much for a guy of Uggla’s “ability”, then what, persay, does Bradley think we should have done to shore up our team.
You’re Ftank Wren, Mark. Subtract Uggla from the equation of the Braves. What moves would you have made, if not Uggla for five years?
ChillyMutt
December 21st, 2010
1:58 pm
I feel you Mark B. I was at Game 3 of the NLDS when a poor fielding 2nd baseman tore my heart out.
My friends and I still reference Brooks Conrad when describing anything awful, tragic, …. or a bowel movement.
Mark Bradley
December 21st, 2010
2:11 pm
Game 3 of the NLDS was the worst thing I’ve seen, ChillyMutt, maybe ever.