
Jamal Crawford and Larry Drew: Why aren't they smiling? (AJC photo by Curtis Compton)
There was a time when the Hawks were coming off a 13-win season, but that was in 2005. These Hawks are coming off 53-29, which represents the third-best mark since the team moved here from St. Louis. So why does it feel as if last season was an epic dud?
Because the season ended with a playoff series that was an epic dud, and the summer was worse. The Hawks underspent for a coach and overspent to keep their best player, and their solution to the annual plaint of we-need-a-real-big-man was to sign the journeymen Josh Powell and Etan Thomas.
Getting swept by Orlando by an average of 25.3 points set the Hawks, who’d been clambering ever upward since the 13-69 nadir of Mike Woodson’s first season, back years in the eyes of its constituency, and the double move of promoting Larry Drew and making Joe Johnson the highest-paid free agent simply underscored the long-held notion that this club doesn’t know what it’s doing. (Never mind that losing Joe Johnson would have issued a similar message.)
The result: The team that finished third in the NBA East will open its season next Wednesday, and there’s no buzz of anticipation. There’s only a rumble of discontent.
“I’m not oblivious to what people are saying and feeling,” said Jamal Crawford, the reigning Sixth Man of the Year and the happiest story of what should have been a happy season. But Crawford contributed to the fractious summer by demanding that the Hawks sign him to a new contract or trade him, neither of which has happened.
“Everyone has an opinion [as to how these Hawks will fare],” Crawford said, speaking after Wednesday’s practice. “It remains to be seen. We’ve got a whole new offense, a whole new system. I hope we’ll be able to take the next step. But you never know.”
Note the contrast. This time a year ago Crawford was as happy to be a Hawk as a 5-year-old running loose in Toys R Us. And now? “You never know.”
Exhibition games don’t mean much in any sport, but it’s worth noting that the Hawks have lost four of five, the most recent being another ritual drubbing by Orlando. On Thursday LeBron James will bring his talents to Philips Arena, and that could get messy, too. Indeed, this whole operation has the capacity to go really bad really fast.
Five of the first eight regular-season games are on the road. Said Drew, speaking of his retooled offense: “I see guys starting to pick it up. I was aware it was going to take some time. But the guys have bought into it, and what’s more important is that the main guy, Joe Johnson, buys into it.”
The proof of this purported buying-in, however, won’t be found in any preseason game. It will come in the final two of minutes of the games that count. Only then will we see if Johnson, who’d grown accustomed to taking nearly every key shot under Woodson, will be willing to defer to Crawford and Josh Smith and Al Horford. Only then will we see if Drew is up to the task.
Woodson was never popular with Hawks fans, and replacing him with just about anybody should have yielded a PR boost. Instead the Hawks replaced him not just with a man who hadn’t been a head coach but one who had been Woodson’s aide-de-camp for six years. (And who, not incidentally, came cheap.)
It was clear the Hawks had gone as far as they could under Woodson. Unclear is whether a guy who has been around this team — the starting five of which has remained unchanged since February 2008 — all along can be an agent of change. It’s possible Drew could represent an upgrade; it’s also possible he could be to Woodson as Ron Jirsa was to Tubby Smith at Georgia.
I take no pleasure in being so downbeat so soon, and I’d love to tell you I’m expecting nothing but great things from these Hawks. But I’d be lying through my teeth if I did.
159 comments Add your comment
Hawks Fan
October 22nd, 2010
9:15 am
So, that was an exciting game last night…
Hawks Fan
October 22nd, 2010
9:18 am
So, that was one exciting game last night.
P Rose
October 22nd, 2010
9:44 am
The NBA sucks. Only two or three teams have a chance to compete in the finals, and we have to sit through nine months of boring games to see who it will be. It won’t be the Hawks. The only way the Hawks will ever contend for the title is if they finish with one of the lowest records in the league, win the lottery and pick a true superstar. That’s the way it works in the NBA.
Ben
October 22nd, 2010
10:08 am
There is no buzz for all the reasons you wrote Mark. The people aren’t stupid. I’d actually like someone from The Spirit sell me on this team. We are a 2nd tier team in the East. With the moves that were made why should fans think things will end any different this year?
Hope I’m wrong but if the NBA is anything, it’s 90% predictable as to who will be in the Conference Finals.
vava74
October 22nd, 2010
1:02 pm
It’s bewildering how Mark Bradley gets paid to write the rubbish he posts around here.
Earl Weaver
October 22nd, 2010
2:39 pm
@PRose: Dead on correct. NBA is a crappy product. Like you said, we already know the three or four teams that will be there in the end. It’s not like baseball or football where you can actually have teams surprise people with a remarkable and unexpected season. The Atlanta Hawks literally have no chance whatsoever, so what’s the motivation to watch them?
I Heart Atlanta
October 26th, 2010
1:19 am
Full of negativity……
You have no idea what your talking about, do us a favor and let MC handle the hawks
I Heart Atlanta
October 26th, 2010
1:23 am
I Heart Atlanta APPROVES of vava74’s Statement
Ryan
October 26th, 2010
7:02 am
Check out my thoughts on the Hawks and the rest of the NBA http://ramsonsports.blogspot.com/