It’s believed the Hawks have interest in signing Shaquille O’Neal, and it’s believed he’s interested in playing here. This is, from the Hawks’ side, a terrible idea. The reasons why:
1. Shaq has almost nothing left. He’s 38. He weighs 750 pounds, give or take. Two seasons ago his team — the Phoenix Suns — didn’t make the playoffs. Last season he joined Cleveland, which promptly got worse: It declined from 66-16 in 2008-2009 to 61-21 in 2009-2010 and lost in Round 2 of the playoffs after reaching the Eastern Conference finals the year before. He averaged 12 points and 6.7 rebounds last season — approximately half his career averages.
2. At this stage of his career, Shaq isn’t as good a center as Al Horford. Yes, Shaq is bigger than Horfy. Shaq, as noted, is bigger than Stone Mountain. But bigger isn’t necessarily better. Horford averaged 14.2 points and 9.9 rebounds and made the All-Star team. Shaq has seen his last All-Star roster.
3. If they add Shaq, the Hawks would weaken themselves at THREE positions. I know a slew of folks insist Horford’s “true” position is power forward, but those folks are, and have always been, flat-out wrong. As gifted as Horford is, he would not be an All-Star at power forward. And if Horford moves to power forward, Josh Smith must play on the perimeter. And nobody in his right mind wants that. A small forward has to shoot (and make) jump shots. Do you really want to grant Smith that license? Thought not.
4. Even if he says he’s willing to take a lesser role, he’s still Shaquille O’Neal. Meaning: He’s an outsize presence with outsize cachet. A NBA man swears the Cavs underperformed because Shaq drove a wedge between coach Mike Brown and LeBron James. Let the record reflect that Brown had led the Cavs to the 2007 NBA finals and was the league’s coach of the year in 2008-2009. Let the record also reflect that Brown is out of work. Now imagine what Shaq might do to a rookie head coach, meaning Larry Drew.
5. This has Moses Malone written all over it. For late tuners-in: The Hawks won 50 games in 1987-88 and nearly upset the Boston Celtics in Round 2 of the playoffs. Desperate to go further, they traded for Reggie Theus and signed Moses Malone. They wound up winning only two more regular-season games and being eliminated by the undermanned Milwaukee Bucks in Round 1 in 1988-89, essentially ending the Hawks’ dreams of contention. And Moses, we should note, was 33 when he arrived here and much closer to his Hall of Fame prime than Shaq is today.
310 comments Add your comment
jstew
July 6th, 2010
12:26 pm
Shaq is self centered and is self serving. Ever stop to wonder why he has now been on 5 teams in 8 years?Wondering why Cleveland is not offering Shaq a contract? Shaq is always about the camera, the money and himself.
BoscoWilson
July 6th, 2010
12:29 pm
An aging Shaq coming to the Hawks looks exactly like an aging moses malone and an aging reggie theus coming to the Hawks years ago to rescue the Hawks from mediocrity. It didnt work then and it wont work now because the Hawks are great enough without Shaq.
Fonz
July 6th, 2010
12:31 pm
‘Shaq is the size of Stone Mountain’
How’s that a bad thing in the defensive paint?
Ken Strickland
July 6th, 2010
12:31 pm
HATFIELDGEOFF-You, like a lot of others, can focus on finding excuses for not signing Shaq if you want. But we managed to accomplish a lot last yr with JCollins and RMorris as backup centers, and starters MBibby and MWilliams grossly under producing. Consider the following:
MWilliams-MINS-30.5, PPG-10.1, RPG-5.1, APG-1.1, BPG-.06
MBibby—-MINS-27.4, PPG–9.1, RPG-2.3, APG-3.9, BPG-.04
SOneal—-MINS-23.4, PPG-12.0, RPG-6.7, APG-1.5, BPG-1.17
Now, after looking at what we accomplished last yr, and comparing the stats of not one, but 2 grossly under achieving starters in MBibby and MWilliams, and 2 all but none existent backup centers in JCollins and RMorris, how in the hell can anyone with a clue say adding Shaq to the mix wouldn’t be an overall improvement?
We aren’t going to make the same stupid mistake Cleveland made last yr by benching Illgouskas and starting Shaq. The Hawks WILL NOT depend on Shaq as a starter, but we will depend on him in certain situations off the bench.
i_am_soulstar
July 6th, 2010
12:32 pm
Mark,
I have a brief counterargument.
Everyone said that Jamal Crawford was more hindrance than help to a team, but the Hawks finally got it right when they put him on the bench. I think the same would happen Shaq, if he’s willing to accept a bench role.
I have a modified version of your 5 points listed, but they are stated assuming Shaq would come in as a bench player.
1) Shaq has almost nothing left, but what he has left is an upgrade over any other attainable back-up center.
2) Shaq isn’t as good as Al Horford, but he would be well-suited for special situations, which is why he should come off the bench.
3) Adding Shaq as a back-up center would bolster the Hawks frontcourt as he’s (as already stated) an instant upgrade over Zaza.
4) In all the situations where Shaq hindered a teams success, he was starting, just like Jamal Crawford. Once Crawford was allowed to focus on what he does best and nothing else, he had a career year.
5) As long as we don’t insert into our starting line-up, I doubt it’d be a Moses Malone repeat. We wouldn’t be putting the fate of entire games and series in his hands at back-up center, we’d be utilizing him when needed for what he does best.
i_am_soulstar
July 6th, 2010
12:33 pm
And besides, no risk, no reward.
Fonz
July 6th, 2010
12:35 pm
Soulstar – mostly agree with your 5 points. The biggest question will be whether or not Shaq will accept a backup role. If he’s willing, I say let’s get him.
Lowcountry Bulldawg
July 6th, 2010
12:36 pm
Shaq’s lack of production is why Cleveland didnt advance? Really?
He missed 53 games last season with a thumb injury. Cleveland new going into the Playoffs he was not going to carry the load so they traded for Jamison, resigned Big Z and had him share minutes with Shaq. Shaq’s stat line for 22 minutes a night is solid in the Playoffs.
If you want to fault anyone again, it was Brown’s inability to get Jamison involved more in the offense and letting him hoist 3’s in the playoffs. Jamison shot 26% (10 for 39) from behind the arc during the Playoffs.
MICHAEL
July 6th, 2010
12:38 pm
BRINGING IN SHAQ IS THE EQUIVELENT TO BRING IN WILT CHAMBERLIN IN THE EARLY SEVENTIES TO THE LAKERS, EXCEPT WILT WAS A TAD BIT BETTER. HOW ABOUT GOING FOR HOWARD WHEN HIS CONTRACT IS UP? I’VE ALWAYS WONDERED WHY ATLANTA SPORTS TEAMS DON’T ATTRACT THE BEST, THEY ALL SEEM TO LIVE THERE.
rainman
July 6th, 2010
12:39 pm
I agree that Boston is our biggest competition in landing Shaq for the mid level exemption – assuming that’s the most he would be paid.
If – Shaq can only get 5.6 (or whatever the exact amt. is), and, he is OK with that & puts some effort into conditioning – then he would probably be the Hawks best option at this point.
Guys like Haywood & Chandler would cost more & would only be aquired if a trade were involved.
Ryder
July 6th, 2010
12:39 pm
There comes a point in which ASG and guys like Mark Bradley have to ask themselves if just winning a playoff series is good enough, because apparently it is for guys like MB and the majority of the fans on this blog.
Atlanta lost a lot of games last year against bigger teams because Horford was the only true low post threat and if he gets in foul trouble look out.
What Bradley fails to realize is that Atlanta almost got beat by a Milwaukee Bucks team WITHOUT THEIR STARTING CENTER! Even if Shaq is half of what he used to be he creates a threat down low that will make opponents think twice about throwing the ball into the paint.
A lineup of Horford-Smith-Shaq-Teague-JJ increases their chance of competing with the bigger teams of the NBA, not just survive against inferior teams like the Bucks.
Atlanta needs to get bigger, and play a smarter type of game in order to step up with the halfcourt teams of the league in the month of May.
cdog
July 6th, 2010
12:39 pm
i’m under the impession that mark bradley want to see atlanta’s pro teams lose so he can write something negative about them.shaq coming to atlanta a question? come on.if kobe or lebron was coming to atlanta, he would try to start a negative column about that.the only place the hawks can go with this is up plus horford would learn valuable experiences from one of the all time great centers in the game.bradley, stick to baseball or in other words, you might want to write about the thrashers, no one is bothered about them
AS
July 6th, 2010
12:40 pm
I would love to see J smoove play a role similar to Gerald Wallace on Charlotte, as a slasher and scorer, flashing into the paint from the perimeter outjumping the small forwards who will guard him to get some offensive boards and put backs. Marvin tries to do this but he is too timid. I think a frontcourt of smoove, horford, and shaq/haywood/brad miller could match up with anyone in the league
Halsey
July 6th, 2010
12:40 pm
The Hawks need to add a long body to their front court. Shaq is better than some of the moves the Hawks could make, because he’s at least interesting.
Robyn
July 6th, 2010
12:41 pm
I completely agree with each and every point you make. Can I also say..you had me at “750lbs”!! Hilarious!
jking2123
July 6th, 2010
12:42 pm
Everyone is always picking on the size of Shaq (this column included), but the guy has 5% body fat (his body fat index has been tested, you can do the research if you don’t believe me). Shaq isn’t fat.
Fonz
July 6th, 2010
12:46 pm
Robyn, you must be joking;
otherwise I have some knock-knock jokes that will have you rolling
Donnell Suggs-Atlanta Voice reporter
July 6th, 2010
12:46 pm
Shaq will undoubtebly make for bigger crowds but I agree with Mr. Bradley’s “Moses Malone theory”. The Hawks will not be better than 4th best in the East regardless who they sign or trade for this summer.
The Real JC
July 6th, 2010
12:46 pm
Well, looks like someone stole my handle. Guess I should post more often.
I might have missed this if someone said it in the 150something comments before me, but Shaq is good for business.
We’ve said it time and again, this city’s basketball fans are about names. That’s why the Hawks didn’t sell out when playing Duncan and the Spurs when they were bagging titles, but still get their panties in a twist every time Kobe comes to town.
Shaq will put butts in seats and jerseys on backs, even if he doesn’t perform anything more than role player duties off the bench. He’s a name people in Atlanta have heard of, and will help ASG will some of Shaq’s salary back in ticket and jersey sales.
Bishop
July 6th, 2010
12:46 pm
Bring in The Big Crunk!
Washed Up
July 6th, 2010
12:47 pm
Paying millions for washed up, lazy players with an attitude like Shaq? Brilliant!!! That should produce an nba title! The hawks management–on top of it baby!
i_am_soulstar
July 6th, 2010
12:49 pm
Robyn,
The Real JC
July 6th, 2010
12:54 pm
Also, is Shaq really a worse option than Randolph Morris, Jason Collins, Joe Smith or the #31 pick? Wasn’t the point of selling the second round pick in order to sign veteran help at the 5? It doesn’t get much more veteran than Shaq.
Timmy
July 6th, 2010
12:56 pm
Sign Shaq, then package him, Bibby, and Marvin for a 2nd round pick in next year’s draft. Then, trade the 2nd round pick for financial considerations.
tremaine
July 6th, 2010
12:56 pm
Al Horford can not guard Dwight Howard. Shaq can at least put a body on Howard and slow him down. I think it is good move to bring in Shaq. As for Josh Smith. He can be a slasher. Shaq is a great passer.
Wolverine
July 6th, 2010
12:56 pm
Mark Bradley you are truly entertaining. You know how to get a rise out of the Hawks faithful. But the true is the Hawks have glaring needs for a PG,C, and a Experience Leader. Now Shaq is passed his prime, but he could give us a good 15 mins a game and some locker room leadership / presence. This move doesnt bother me that much, but we do need an experience PG that would lead. Tony Parker? Chris Paul?
I know they are pipe dreams especially the latter but Hawks fans need to understand that how we are built we will not win a title. Now is the time to make a move for a good pg and yes I would trade Josh Smith to get one.
The Real JC
July 6th, 2010
12:57 pm
@Washed up – at least they’re spending money and taking risks, not something you’d expect to hear in the same sentence as ASG.
Navigator
July 6th, 2010
1:00 pm
Can’t jump, no longer score inside, can’t hit free throws, folks this is about Shaq going for the best pay check. Since the Hawks just got finished paying way too much for JJ’s service, why wouldn’t they want an over the hill center?
HawkKingBibby
July 6th, 2010
1:02 pm
M.B. All Shaq has to do is drink one of those 5 hour energys before each game. Give one to Smoove as well so he wont stand there and watch Orlando scope up loose balls and rebounds under his nose while he pouts. Who would you use the Hawks MLE on MB?
i_am_soulstar
July 6th, 2010
1:06 pm
Narrow minded blogging makes me sad. I’m not even fan of Shaq. In fact, that whole thing with he and Gilbert Arenas’ fiancee slightly disgusts me. But still, it’s plain to see how he’d help this team as a back-up.
JR1967
July 6th, 2010
1:08 pm
Thanks Mark for those “wonderful” memories of the Hawks losing to the Bucks in the 1989 Playoffs-the same Bucks team that was led by the likes of Fred Roberts and Brad Lohaus. To go further, they won Game 5 of the first round here at the old Omni building after the Hawks won all 5-6 games they played in the regular season.
The Real JC
July 6th, 2010
1:09 pm
In case everyone was wondering, Shaq would get around $5.8 for the MLE. Which would place him in between Marvin Williams and Mike Bibby’s salaries. He made $20 million last season.
First, he is not a huge financial burden for the Hawks. Secondly, his decrease in salary clearly establishes his place as a role player on the Hawks, not a star.
Finally, you can’t teach 7-1 and 325 lbs. Just ask Al Horford.
in the NICK of time
July 6th, 2010
1:14 pm
i suggest we go ahead and get the BIG BUZZARD shirts printed , because there aren’t many cactus in Atlanta they don’t seem to do real well in cement. and all the big diesel engines have to bypass ATL so it don’t look good for the BIG BUZZARD at this stage of his career, which means he will probably be on the roster before long
joseph killeen
July 6th, 2010
1:17 pm
mark i agree man completely me and a buddy of mine were talkin about this whole shaq hawk thing and we both said shaq is a giant risk i mean he would give atlanta a big man but i like seeing big al out their horford is much more capable for the job he may be undersized but he is a match up problem and shaq has injury issues heres a tip HAWKS STAY AWAY FROM SHAQFU
ReddJonn68
July 6th, 2010
1:21 pm
@ Mark Bradley & Hawksnation. Instead of stirring a hornets nest on what Shaq has left, why aren’t you writing about how we get absolutely nothing from ZaZa & no energy whatsoever from our bench. I also don’t see you saying the same things about Joe Smith, though a solid vet he has also seen better days. This team needs another presence inside & an additional experienced veteran. There is no big man help out there, that’s going to fall in our laps. As for the Horford critics, he’s a solid young guy out of the Kendrick Perkins mode ( just a bit undersized ), he just needs more seasoning & the right coaching. Plus I didn’t see the media complaining when Perkins along with an aging Rasheed & the Celts destroyed the Cavs. People do not understand that with these guys signing for the maxx contracts there is no money left on the books to make any aggressive moves. I say get something that we will at least get a return on at this point. I pray that we do get full value out of Joe, because we have got nothing out of recently signed contracts; Bibby, Marvin, & Za Za have not earned the money awarded. Hawks fans seem so delusional sometimes, faced with this ownership & the young core we have in place, we better try anything to progress instead regressing. Because if the latter happens, we are gonna have one heck of a fire sale !!! And for the record that 88-89 team was coached by Fratello ( need I say more ), and for those of us who remember even with talent, that team had no direction much like your present 09-10 Hawks ( 2 all-stars on that roster Nique & Moses ala Horford & Joe ). Moses averaged 20.2 ppg- 12.0 rpg- 1.3 bpg Theus 15.8 ppg- 4.7 apg- 1.3 spg Doc 13.6 ppg- 6.9 apg- 2.4 spg & Nique 26 ppg- 6.9 rpg- 2.6 apg . Plus you had Battle, Levingston, & Carr contributing major pts. off the bench. I’m sorry Mark the problem was not Big Mo but little Fratello !!!
TampaGator
July 6th, 2010
1:21 pm
Pro (self) basketball…what is that? Shaq…is that a hip hop dance? Hawks…that has something to do with people in congress, right? What a bunch of dribble the NBA is…no pun intended!
northcyde
July 6th, 2010
1:22 pm
Enter your comments here
TampaGator
July 6th, 2010
1:22 pm
And when does college football practice begin?
YoMommaBrother
July 6th, 2010
1:23 pm
The Hawks need a center period. Shaq is coming off the bench doing spot work. They don’t even have to play him until after the All-Star break. Not to mention Shaq can still score.
If you saw the Orlando series it was Dwight Howard murdering the Hawks all day long. That’s all it boiled down to. He’s tall enough and quick enough to severely bother Al Horford on the defensive end. He’s way stronger than Horford and can post up very low on the block. Howard is also taller so essentially with his athleticism makes Horford contesting any shot impossible.
Shaq will help with these problems. he won’t completely eliminate them but will definitely help a little bit. Dwight cannot push Shaq around on the block or when vying for rebound position. Being able to simply man up with Dwight Howard causes the perimeter to be guarded better. On defense, offensive players are still scared to bring it in to Shaq because he’s still 350 lbs and is not afraid to knock somebody down.
Why did the Celtics smash the Magic? They were able to defend Howard 1 on 1 with big slow Perkins…and they had a significant advantage at PF with KG bodying Rashard Lewis the entire series. Horford at PF would absolutely kill Rashard Lewis.
The Hawks were forced to double team. They knew Howard would get his points but the way he got them was unacceptable. Dunk after Dunk, putbacks…gaining position deep, offensive rebounds…simply put the points were too easy. Shaq will push him out the lane, make him take some hook shots or running floaters and not to mention expend energy.
Shaq to the Hawks would put them over the top in my opinion.
on the other hand
July 6th, 2010
1:24 pm
motivation !
never doubt what motivation can do for a man if shaq is really motivated because kobe has one more title than he does , he might show up in atlanta in shape and dialed in , let him coast the regular season just enough minutes to stay sharp and then unleash him in the playoffs. kinda like doc rivers did with his best players . shaq may be thinking if i get one more title with my third different team i will be remembered better than Kobe .especially if he helps a team like the hawks without a superstar get a title.
d.carter
July 6th, 2010
1:28 pm
Mark you must be smoking again!!! Shaq is still a threat down low and will stop many of the jumpshot ladden lulls that we tend to have…. Shaq still requires a doubleteam and would open up the perimeter for JJ and jamal…. Not to mention the fact that he would allow us to be much more aggressive on the perimeter defensively, 7feet 350 is 7feet 350 no matter how you slice it, the hawks should be aggressively persuing Shaq!!! all of these people on this blog must be hiding under those empty seats in phillips on those tuesday night games against the Wizards!!!! LMAO
ASG you have got to spend money to make money… And all this Shaq off the bench talk means you have apparently not been watching the Hawks, we dont have a low post person on the team!!! AL doesnt have a low post move to speak of, ( needs to turn and face more) Josh is camped out on the 3pt line watching JJ dribble for 20 seconds… I think Shaq wants to be relevant again and would fit great with this team because he is still a matchup problem for every center in the NBA!!! AL would flourish at the 4spot and Josh would then either go to the bench or become a very big 3 moving Marvin to the bench which is where he is probaly most comfortable….. GET REAL PEOPLE
TONE
July 6th, 2010
1:28 pm
when shaq ends up with the celtics and they get doc another championship I want to be the first to second guess myself.
“the hawks should have signed shaq he was there for the taking ” now i am covered
cdog
July 6th, 2010
1:31 pm
overall, the hawks need shaq oneil.moses malone didn’t fail in atlanta, it was the acquisition of reggie theus and the fact that the hawks were a selfish team with a bunch of individuals.what hurt that year. when management got rid of tree rollins and randy wittman,that hurt the team chemistry when reggie theus came aboard. as i recall, shaq has nba champuonships to his credit with much needed experience.mark, don’t even go that with your brainless comments and ideas.you just want to start a debate unneccessarily.on the real side, acquiring shaq would be the missing piece to the frontcourt that the hawks have longed for.even if he doesn’t start, can boster the team to get to the next level.
Fonz
July 6th, 2010
1:35 pm
Moses parted the red sea. Shaq will part the blue paint
bravesfanbob
July 6th, 2010
1:46 pm
We will continue to be overmanned in the playoffs against any team who has a dominate center if we don’t have a big body to play the 5. I don’t think Shaq is the answer, but it would allow Horford to move to the 4, and Josh to move to the 3. Both of them would be better suited in those positions, and the team would be able to play better defense because they wouldn’t be double teaming so much down low, and because of this, they could switch from zone to man-to-man often enough to confuse. So I do believe that Shaq would be helpful, but he won’t bring a championship. If we could also send Marvin and either Bibby or Teague along with a draft pick or Jordan Crawford to the Hornets for Chris Paul, the Hawks might be in business. This would fit under the cap, too. Regardless, we need a big, dependable body inside, or we go nowhere in the postseason.
Pay Shaq
July 6th, 2010
1:47 pm
Pay Shaq whatever he wants to come to Atlanta. The hawks need a big name to juice up ticket sales. Plus, Shaq has a lot of connections in the media and in the music industry and the hawks can get a lot more rappers to the game to buy those pricey courtside seats! Shaq–a win win baby!!!
Terrell
July 6th, 2010
1:48 pm
Hey MB, PD said @ 10:46 am there was an article that said Horford wants to play the 4 (PF). Here’s a portion of the excerpt:
J.J. is back now. The Hawks still plan to add more pieces, including a center. Al reiterated his stance that he prefers to play power forward but isn’t making any demands about switching positions.
“I’m fine with [center] but my natural position is obviously the four,” he said.
So since all of us are wrong about AL’s natural postion, is Al wrong too about his position?
northcyde
July 6th, 2010
1:48 pm
1) Shaq almost has nothing left.
Even a diminished Shaquille O’Neal is better than most centers in the league. While he’s not a dominant force, he’s still easily a top 10 center in the NBA. The Cavs were 40 – 13 in the regular season with Shaq in the lineup, a .755 winning percentage. Without him in the lineup, the Cavs were 21 – 8, a .724 winning percentage
Shaq was brought in specifically to try to handle Dwight Howard. In their 1st meeting last year AT ORLANDO, Howard scored 11 points and had 7 rebounds . . . and 5 fouls. Shaq barely played 20 minutes in that game, but was instrumental in seeing Howard pick up 2 quick fouls in the first 3 minutes. Cavs lead wire to wire, and win the game by 9 . . but had 22 point lead at one point in that 4th quarter
2nd meeting . . Cavs win by 11 . . Howard scores 19 points and 11 rebounds . . and has 5 fouls again. Shaq, once again, only plays 19 minutes and scores 10 points and 6 rebounds. Dwight won the head to head battle this time, but still lost the war. The combination of Shaq and Big Z kept Howard from completely dominating the game ( like he does against the Hawks )
3rd meeting . . Magic win by 6 . . Howard has a monster game, 22 points, 16 rebs, 4 blks . . Shaq plays well offensively, scoring 20 points and grabbing 5 rebs in 31 minutes . . but Cleveland loses because Mo Williams and Delonte West collectively shot 3 – 18 FG
4th meeting was a game the Cavs didn’t play Shaq nor Lebron. . . Magic win by 8 . . Howard dominates . . 22 points, 13 rebs, 6 blks.
So Shaq was 2 – 1 vs the Magic in the games that he played in. And only lost the 3rd game because Delonte and Mo couldn’t hit the broad side of a barn.
Mike
July 6th, 2010
1:48 pm
1) Shaq is not the reason Cleveland is losing playoff games. Cleveland continues to surround Lebron with guys that will not step up when it counts. They disappear in the playoffs just like they did in 2008 before Shaq. In 2007, Lebron almost single handedly took down the Pistons in the Eastern Conference finals. Against the Spurs in the Finals, he couldnt do that and they got swept.
2) As for Shaq and the Suns, they missed the playoffs because Nash and Stoudamire were both injured and they were in the West. Their record would have put them 5th in the East.
3) Shaq averages 12 pts per game because his minutes are down to 24 per game. Thats actually a productive average.
4) Horford is not big enough to clog the lane. This has been a consistent problem in the Hawks defense. They have no one that can take charge of the paint. The Hawks consistently leave a wide open lane to drive through, and premiere inside players like Howard destroy them regularly. None of the Hawks have an inside enforcer mentality. Shaq would bring them that option.
Bringing in Shaq to a much more versatile team than Cleveland would be an excellent move.
Shaq Style
July 6th, 2010
1:50 pm
You see this cat Shaq is a bad mother—
Shut your mouth!
But I’m talkin’ about Shaq
Then we can dig it.