The Hawks allow the unassuming Bucks to make this a series

Somebody guard that guy! Brandon Jennings exults after another trey. (AP photo)

Somebody guard that guy! Brandon Jennings exults after another trey. (AP photo)

Milwaukee — They had a chance to show us they’d matured. They had a chance to make quick work of a team that, without Andrew Bogut, is the weakest entity in the playoff grid. Instead the Hawks gave the Milwaukee Bucks reason to believe. If you’re the better team, that’s the last thing you want.

The Hawks trailed by 17 points after 12 minutes of Game 3. They didn’t look like the better team. They didn’t look like much of a team at all. They were outflanked tactically and overwhelmed emotionally.

“Unacceptable,” said Joe Johnson, who scored 16 of the Hawks’ 40 first-half points.

“I was disappointed,” said Al Horford, who had two points the first half. “I didn’t think we were there mentally.”

“We didn’t bring our own energy,” said Josh Smith, who managed only seven points in 36 minutes after stirring up a mini-tempest by suggesting Milwaukee is Nowheresville. (Smith afterward: “I didn’t say anything that wasn’t true.”)

Their play in the first quarter suggested the Hawks believed they’d already won the series, which technically they haven’t. (NBA rules stipulate four victories, not two.) They were a step slow from the start, and that’s a bad thing to be when the other team is smaller and quicker.

The Bucks spread the court and ran their guards off screens. The Hawks, as is their wont, switched on everything, which spawned little-on-big mismatches. As good a defenders as Smith and Al Horford are, they can’t keep up with Brandon Jennings and John Salmons 25 feet from the hoop.

Jennings made three treys in the first 7 1/2 minutes. He and Salmons made nine of 10 shots between them in the first 9 1/2 minutes, at which point the Bucks led 31-13. So much for coming on the road and taking the crowd out of the game. So much for matching an overmatched opponent’s fire with fire.

The Bucks know they cannot hope to beat the Hawks by playing conventional basketball. Milwaukee’s only hope is to dazzle its opponent with footwork, and that’s precisely what occurred in Game 3. The Bucks didn’t try to feed the post because they don’t have a post player. They made their last stand on the perimeter, and they wound up standing pretty darn tall.

Let’s be honest: This was the key game in the series. Not regarding its outcome — the Hawks should and will prevail — but its duration. The Hawks came to the frigid Midwest with a chance to put the Bucks to bed, and instead they were wrong-footed. With Orlando leading Charlotte 3-0, that’s a major consideration. You don’t want to be the team coming into Round 2 on short rest.

It’s not that good teams never lose a game in the postseason. They do. Cleveland fell way behind at Chicago but wound up nearly winning. The Lakers lost in Oklahoma City. The difference is, both those Game 3 losers gave themselves a chance. The Hawks fell behind and stayed there. They never put any game pressure, to use a Krzyzewski phrase, on the home team. They made it too easy.

And that’s the reason the Hawks still aren’t considered a first-tier NBA team. Yeah, they won 53 games this season, but they had a losing record on the road. Given a chance to make a bold statement in this essential road game, they looked up halfway through the fourth quarter and saw themselves 28 points in arrears.

They’re better than that, or they should be. They’re seasoned enough to know what’s coming in a Game 3 on the road. They’re gifted enough to take an inspired opponent’s best shot and hit back harder. But on this sobering night they seemed content to rely on Philips Arena to win the series for them.

Which it can. The Bucks aren’t apt to break through in Atlanta. But the Hawks can’t reach the Eastern Conference finals unless they win away from home against an opponent far better than Milwaukee.

170 comments Add your comment

Mark Bradley

April 25th, 2010
10:15 am

I don’t think that’s Woodson’s offense that is calling for the jump shots. I think that’s Woodson’s players taking way too many jump shots.

And you’ve got me on Teague and Marvin. I don’t understand why one’s on the floor and the other is not.

PJ

April 25th, 2010
10:16 am

Fans aren’t fair-weather. It more like the players of pro sports in ATL are just fair. Bottomline is you have to win championships to get the type of fans support of LA Lakers or New York Yankees..

ajw

April 25th, 2010
10:20 am

The Bucks were just totally on fire. They hit every perimeter jumper. This prevented any long rebounds and fast breaks. No one went for any steals. Defense wasn’t aggressive at all. Btw, the Lakers/Thunder game looked the same. Wasn’t even close. Zaza needs more playing time too. As a former Buck, he is really motivated to play hard and was very effective last night. Woodson hardly gave him any playing time. I fully expect the Bucks to have a harder time Monday.

jgsbrids

April 25th, 2010
10:25 am

Mark,

Why do we have to double down on anyone on this team? I think the Hawks should be able to play straight up defense against the Bucks, therefore not giving up uncontested jumpers. One thing the Bucks did last night was shoot it well–we’re lucky they didn’t do that in Atlanta or we would be in real trouble.

Also, I want to know why it is when Milwaukee shoots the ball they have offensive players crashing the boards and when we shot the ball last night–everyone just assumed it was going in and didn’t even attempt to crash. There were atleast 5 or 6 times that we shot a jumpshot with absolutely know near the basket and no one charging the boards when the shot was attempted.

I hope they get these things straightened out by tomorrow–team basketball always wins out over “talent” basketball. Keith B. and Adam–I like your team–when they got down by 20 on the road they battled back and could’ve won either Game 1 or Game 2. When the Hawks got down by 15-17 in Game 3 I knew they wouldn’t get back into the game and told a buddy that this one would end up being a 30 point game. The Bucks have some heart and pride–we better match it or we’ll be the ones watching Milwaukee get blown out by Orlando instead of having the chance to play them.

ELIZABETH

April 25th, 2010
10:54 am

This is easy. The games are rigged to play more, sell more tickets (to those dumb enough to buy them), have more TV programming, and sell more commercials. The fix is in folks. Not hard to see that.

dr.maryb

April 25th, 2010
10:59 am

Mark Bradley

The Lakers did NOT give themselves a CHANCE to win game 3. Lakers lost by 21 points & the Hawks lost by 18 points.

So, what is your point you posted up there? Aren’t you the GT Beat Writer?

Big Dog

April 25th, 2010
11:04 am

Bradley: “Why is a big-time journalist sitting in a college dorm?”

Wow, aren’t you special. I feel honored knowing we have a ‘big-time’ journalist grace us with his presence in Milwaukee. I hope you have been able to pamper yourself these past couple days with personal amenities since apparently there’s ‘nothing to do in Milwaukee.’ It’s a shame you’ll have to come back up here to ‘England’ again for Game 6…..

dr.maryb

April 25th, 2010
11:13 am

Mz. Punk

Please explain HOW the Lakers trailing by 31 points & losing by 21 points gave themselves a – Chance
To Win?

Al

April 25th, 2010
11:14 am

What- replace Marvin with who, Mo Evans? Have you seen how pathetic his play has been?

Mark Bradley

April 25th, 2010
11:48 am

The Lakers did not lose Game 3 by 21 points.

DawgNole

April 25th, 2010
12:01 pm

PJ: “Fans aren’t fair-weather. It more like the players of pro sports in ATL are just fair. Bottomline is you have to win championships to get the type of fans support of LA Lakers or New York Yankees.”
______________________________

Actually, many of the fans here are fair-weather, which means the first part of your statement isn’t completely accurate. But you hit it right on the head with the rest of your post: “. . . the players of pro sports in ATL are just fair. Bottomline is you have to win championships to get the type of fans support of LA Lakers or New York Yankees.”

Truer words were never spoken (or written). This city’s major pro sports teams have but ONE championship (’95 Braves) to show for nearly half a century of competition. That’s a record of futility matched by few, if any. It’s also a disgrace–and goes to the heart of why the city is widely recognized in pro sports circles (by fans/media/players) as “Losersville.” The Hawks are who we’re writing about today–a team that has NEVER made it past the second round of the playoffs since arriving in this city 40-plus years ago. Can anyone honestly say that it will be any different this year? Don’t think so. No ATL pro sports fan should EVER have to take grief for being fair-weather. Win championships–just like PJ said–and the fans will be there for you. WIN CHAMPIONSHIPS!

Mz. You Got Punked Hawkdafied

April 25th, 2010
12:05 pm

dr.maryb, at the time I didn’t even know of the Lakers defeat. I don’t give a f about the Lakers. However I do care about the Hawks’ struggles and triumphants. Guess that would explain it, huh?

Broken Record

April 25th, 2010
12:14 pm

“We didn’t play with any energy”

“For some reason we came out complacent”

“We just weren’t ready to play”

“We’ll have to look at the film”

Scott

April 25th, 2010
1:19 pm

Woodson should have benched the entire starting 5 in the first half. I have been watching Hawks teams since their arrival in Atlanta with Lou Hudson, Walt Hazzard…… This Hawks team is so frustrating to watch. Their lack of passion, consistency, and offense will not allow them to ever win anything beyond the first round. Josh Smith’s athleticism is outstanding but he disappears mentally and emotionally way too much. Either the mix of players or the coach or both have to change to get to the next level.

Harpie

April 25th, 2010
2:43 pm

Dear Mike Woodson – Please do Atlanta sports fans a favor: if the Hawks brass is too stupid to fire you, do the decent thing and QUIT! You don’t know what in the heck you’re doing!

Jordan G.

April 25th, 2010
3:17 pm

What do you mean “[t]he Hawks allow the undermanned Bucks to make it a series”? Milwaukee CONTROLLED the game, start to finish. They dominated and forced the Hawks into an utter state of confusion. The Bucks’ defense was superb, and the offense was clicking as well as can be expected in a playoff game.

Milwaukee won’t roll over for anyone, and it seems as though Atlanta expected an easy win coming into the game. It’s for that reason Atlanta cannot win a title; they (and by ‘they,’ I’m singling out Josh Howard in particular) are not mature enough to take that leap. Milwaukee will make it a series. Don’t be surprised if this thing goes seven games.

corrina252

April 26th, 2010
1:30 am

I have lived in Milwaukee my entire life and want to personally thank Josh Smith for firing up the team and entire city with his comments. By the way, having traveled to many cities in the country I have found that some of the most lethargic sports fans you can encounter live in altanta.

corrina252

April 26th, 2010
1:36 am

Ahhhh, poor Mark Bradley! Your mommy didn´t pack your galoshes and umbrella. Get over yourself, you big-time jagoff.

corrina252

April 26th, 2010
1:41 am

Secondly, who refers to themselves as a “big-time” journalist? Only a inferior unknown like yourself.

corrina252

April 26th, 2010
2:42 am

Even if the hawks get past the bucks, they don´t stand a chance in the 2nd round. However, if they do and end up playing Cleveland, which is another city like milwaukee that gets bashed by ignorant thugs, i hope josh smith opens his big mouth about how cleveland sucks.