If Spiller’s there on April 22, should the Falcons draft him?

You tell me: How would the guy in blue look in red? (AJC photo by Brant Sanderlin)

You tell me: How would the guy in purple look in red? (AJC photo by Brant Sanderlin)

In his latest mock draft, Don Banks of SI.com still has the Falcons taking the same cornerback with the 19th pick in Round 1 – Kyle Wilson of Boise State. But that’s not the intriguing part. The intriguing part is the player Banks has slotted to go 20th overall.

C.J. Spiller, running back, Clemson.

In every draft, for every team, there’s a name that assumes outsize importance. (”Wouldn’t it be great if our team got that guy?”) For Falcons fans, Spiller is that name this time. He played up the road. He played against Georgia Tech every season. He made spectacular plays. His drafting would excite a constituency in a way no offensive tackle ever could. That said …

The Falcons have a great running back in Michael Turner and someone who approximates Spiller in Jerious Norwood. (Although Norwood has worked under three coaching staffs, none of which has been able to unlock his potential.) The pressing need is again on defense. But if Spiller’s available when the Falcons’ turn comes, could they say no?

Thomas Dimitroff claims every draft is need-based, but the Falcons’ offense wasn’t quite as good as advertised in 2009. Dimitroff said this week that “this draft isn’t going to be as lopsided” as last year’s, which was almost all defense, and that would indicate the Falcons are open to possibilities. If the possibility exists for you to snatch a Percy Harvin, don’t you have to try? (Minnesota chose Harvin with the 22nd overall pick in 2009; he was voted rookie of the year.)

And my answer is … I don’t know. I go back and forth on this one. Spiller was a great college player when healthy, but he wasn’t always healthy. (He had to leave the ACC title game because of turf toe.) He’s not an every-down back, but the Falcons don’t really need an every-down back because they have Turner. He’d be great on reverses, which Mike Mularkey loves to call, and on screens, which Mularkey almost never calls.

Could the Falcons pass on C.J. Spiller?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

So, as opposed to the usual format where I tell you what I think and you’re free to disagree (which any right-thinking person would do), I’m going to be agnostic this once and ask for your help. Please tell me why the Falcons should — or should not — draft Spiller if he’s on the board. I thank you in advance.

Oh, and one thing more: The team Banks has taking Spiller at No. 20 — Houston — actually might pick 19th. The Falcons and the Texans have their coin flip today at the combine in Indianapolis. So it’s possible the Falcons could miss on Spiller by the outcome of a toss. That would be a bummer. Or would it?

Update: The Falcons won the coin flip this morning. They have the 19th pick.

284 comments Add your comment

hello

February 26th, 2010
7:05 am

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
7:06 am

Hello is No. 1 this a.m. Congrats.

Indeed

February 26th, 2010
7:07 am

If Spiller falls to Atlanta at 19 (or 20, depending on the coin flip), I think the Falcons have to take him. He is a game-changing player who can score any time he runs, catches or returns the ball. He is a perfect change of pace RB for Turner, and he makes the Falcons a dangerous team on special teams.

Nothing is guaranteed in the NFL draft, but Spiller looks like a much safer bet than any of the CBs, DEs or OLBs previously mentioned. It looks like an easy decision to make.

Tim

February 26th, 2010
7:09 am

Tim

February 26th, 2010
7:11 am

Spiller would be a good pick up for the falcons. Get another cb in free agency and go for a DE/OLB with 2nd pick. Spiller helps the offense in year one. Most CB’s don’t produce well as rookies….

lanier

February 26th, 2010
7:14 am

saw him at Clemons 3 times. yes yes yes

Doug

February 26th, 2010
7:16 am

We need a Stud on the defensive line. Our offense is good enough to win games our defense is not.

Vinny D

February 26th, 2010
7:25 am

It would make punt and kick returns a bit more exciting, thats for sure. Could he be that Devin Hester type who every time the ball gets in his hands, you know there is a chance for something big? If so, thats worth a 19th pick. Unless of course there is a Joe Haden or someone else who magically fell from the sky into our lap but the likeliness of that is well, unlikely.

Tailback U

February 26th, 2010
7:30 am

You simply don’t pass on rare talent unless there are character

problems that would disqualify. I remember when Peterson came

out in the draft wanting the Falcons to take him but doubting

that they would. I wonder to this day if the Vikings had not

taken him in front of them would they have drafted him.

Chef Mentuer

February 26th, 2010
7:40 am

FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST FIRST

Nativebird

February 26th, 2010
7:46 am

No. It’s the defense…uh…dude.

Kudzu

February 26th, 2010
7:49 am

We have Harry Douglas…he can do great things…if he stays healthy…which can be said of every player i guess…WE NEED a drop dead stout defense that will rank #1…

alan

February 26th, 2010
7:49 am

Defense improves the offense which we have and Matt is now a 3rd year QB with smarts, go defense and try to find a good WR addition.

Sleeze

February 26th, 2010
7:51 am

Change of pace running back, slot receiver, 3rd down back, punt returns, kick off returns, and a threat to take it to the house every time he touches the ball….and there are no character issue here. The Falcons offense suffered last year because Douglas was out and Norwood was either hurt or ineffective, hence there were no gamebreakers. If he’s there, Falcons HAVE to take him.

FBR

February 26th, 2010
7:52 am

Spiller made the technoids look silly(they weren’t the only ones). They would be crazy to pass on him.

John

February 26th, 2010
7:53 am

The Falcons need to load up on defensive line first, cornerbacks second, offensive linemen third, running backs fourth

Mike Jay

February 26th, 2010
7:54 am

Last time I checked ‘rare talent’ doens’t usually fall to the 20th pick in the draft.

I’m not sure the Falcons cand tie up that much money at the RB poosition. Turner makes a boat load of $. I believe he is the second highest paid player on the team. A first round pick, even at 19 is going to be paid very well. Douglas will be back and if you all recall he was pretty damn exiciting on special teams and seemed to be ablee to make something happen everytime he touches the ball.

Walker, Texas Ranger

February 26th, 2010
7:55 am

hell to the yes, draft D with the other 6 or 7 picks

not there yet

February 26th, 2010
7:56 am

Falcons are reasonably set at RB. This team is not good enough to start drafting “best available talent” and should still use the draft to address specific needs like CB.

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
7:56 am

All due respect to H. Douglas … but I’m not sure he has Spiller’s talent.

Walker, Texas Ranger

February 26th, 2010
7:59 am

Plus Douglas is a slot receiver only, average return guy. Spiller can handle returns, be the 3rd down back and spell Turner on first and second downs plus he can catch the ball. He would be used like Bush with the Saints.

come on

February 26th, 2010
8:00 am

i mean he sounds great but lets remember we already have a fast back, and cj has the same problem he is always hurt. the last thing we need to do is blow a first round pick on a always hurt back up running back. if we were talking about him in the 2nd or 3rd round snatch him up, but we can not blow a pick on some one who is always hurt

Dawg Consultant

February 26th, 2010
8:02 am

You absolutely should not take CJ if he is there with the Falcons pick. Now, first let me say that I am a Spiller fan. He is electric with the ball, and stayed 4 years and was a team leader. He is not, however a good value for the 19th or 20th pick in the draft. CJ is basically Reggie Bush lite. For the all hype coming out of USC Reggie Bush is basically a kick returner, who does not even start at running back.

Folks, my philosophy is simple. Draft projected starters with your 1st round picks and your coaches will stay employed and you will get to see a few playoff games. Draft guys who are going to make one big play ever other game at best, and you get what the Falcons have had throughout the years; only one back to back stretch of winning seasons.

Joseph

February 26th, 2010
8:03 am

I would much rather see us draft Dexter McCluster. He is every bit as dynamic as Spiller and much more durable. Also, we could get him in a later round and pick a corner or DE first.

smittydawg

February 26th, 2010
8:03 am

The top NFL offenses have these type of players namely the Vikings with Harvin and the Saints with Bush (both 1st rounders). I would put Spiller’s potential right up there with them. It makes it much harder for opposing defenses when this type of player is on the field and would open things up for Roddy White and Tony G.
Norwood just ain’t that guy…….take Spiller!

El Bravo

February 26th, 2010
8:03 am

MB, with our needs at defense, TE and WR it doesn’t seem wise to go after a RB. We can fill our second RB needs via free agency (Willie Parker comes to mind). Also, you can find solid RBs late in the draft (it is usually one of the deepest positions in the draft year in and year out)…

SimpleDawg

February 26th, 2010
8:04 am

An intriguing choice…..could be an impact player in the NFL a la Reggie Bush, Percy Harvin.

If the pass rushing defensive end you covet is gone at the pick and Spiller is there….take him. But only if you’re convinced that he is the missing piece to your offense.

TD will earn his money this year on draft day.

PJM

February 26th, 2010
8:06 am

Joseph is right – McCluster is every bit as good and gets picked later in the draft.

come on

February 26th, 2010
8:06 am

if we need a fast back up running back who can return kicks why not look at dexter mccluster out of ole miss later in the draft. that way we don’t lock first round money into a back up and use our first pick for a starting player that we need.

Walker, Texas Ranger

February 26th, 2010
8:08 am

Come on, always hurt? you must be describing our back up now, Norwood. Spiller missed 1 game in 4 years.

waynester

February 26th, 2010
8:10 am

I agree with you guys saying defense first round, but we really can’t rely on Norwood’s health anymore with the concussions being such a concern league-wide it may be harder to sign and trade him. Even if there are no takers for Jerious we still need that “difference maker” catching passes out of the backfield. He will still be available in the late 2nd/early3rd and his name is Dexter McCluster. No man-crush but this little guy could relly help us change-of-pace and as a returner. The big problem with this year’s draft is that I believe we’re going to have to do some wheelin’&dealin’ to get into a position to grab the few key pieces we need in the first few rounds. There’s great depth guys in the later rounds, but We’re going to have to move around some on the board to finish this team without going the more expensive FA route. Thanks Mark & AJC for the forum for those of us with a Falcons Jones this offseason!

Walker, Texas Ranger

February 26th, 2010
8:11 am

Screw it, lets trade every pick we have to the Raiders of Seymore & Asomugha. Then we are assured of upgrading the D-line and CB.

Walker, Texas Ranger

February 26th, 2010
8:12 am

“for” not “of”

Brad

February 26th, 2010
8:15 am

A corner from Boise???HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! The guy has been covering AAA high school WRs and people think he can play pro, WHAT A JOKE!

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
8:15 am

As noted in the update above: The Falcons won the coin flip. They have the No. 19 pick.

Let's Go

February 26th, 2010
8:19 am

This is a very deep draft on the Defense side this year so unless there is a stud DE or one of the top 3 OT’s that drop down then taking him would not be that big of a deal. Norwood is good but it may be time to go another route. One the plus side Spiller will be your kickoff and punt returner and that may be the biggest advantage of drafting him.

All I'm Saying Is...

February 26th, 2010
8:19 am

Some teams draft the best available player irrespective of need and some teams use the draft to fill their holes. This will be another chance for TD to earn his money. I would ask whether Spiller is a unique talent, whether he is at least as good as Harvin or even the over-rated Reggie Bush? I didn’t seem him play much so I don’t rank him as high as those other two. Given the glaring weaknesses for the Falcons, I’d have to pass on C.J. and go with a stud d-lineman or CB.

LET’S GO FALCONS!

Ivan Vasilii Vladivostok, aka "Pasha dat a$$"

February 26th, 2010
8:20 am

Only if we trade Michael Turner to the Raiders for their 1st round pick and pick up Joe Haden…..but that aint gonna happen.

Ginger

February 26th, 2010
8:21 am

No….not unless He was going to be an every down back and the injury hx is something to consider. Falcons have to get better on defense if they want to be one of the elite teams. Fixing the pass defense is very important..& the pass defense problems are multifocal….Do we draft secondary guy or LB or DE player….Think that I would rate my weakest link order and then draft the best player when I chose from those positions…i.e…if corner is my weakest rated link and I have a number 1 corner that I really like available — I take him….if corner is my weakest, but I don’t have a true number 1 corner available and no one that I really like that good and I have a number 1 LB and it is my 2nd weakest link–then I take him. Hopefully, then I pick up a pretty good corner in third round since no 2nd rounder…..Evaluating talent is so important…with Spiller—would not use my number 1 because the defense is really in need of help and have Turner–so Spiller would have to be able to beat out Turner for me to pick him and not be able to draft defense until 3rd round…

teamguy

February 26th, 2010
8:21 am

I think Spiller is the type of player that would sell tickets. .very exciting. He did get hurt a good bit in college, but he was more than a situational player for Clemson. McCluster is a good player as well, but I don’t think he’ll have the impact that Spiller will. Plus, even though Spiller would occasionally get dinged up, he wouldn’t just quit. I’ve seen him get hurt, then be back on the field in the next few plays. In fact, I think the turf toe problem was one he dealt with most of the season last year.

Ginger

February 26th, 2010
8:22 am

Yeah…Dimitrioff…2 for 2 in coin flips

Ned Zeffer

February 26th, 2010
8:24 am

I trust Dimitroff to make the right pick. He’s the most capable GM we have ever had.

Blue Fender

February 26th, 2010
8:28 am

I think the Falcons need TD to start making the coin flip call when the birds play overtime games. Maybe we could get the ball first and win a few of those.

Mike Jay

February 26th, 2010
8:29 am

Mark, I hear you about H. Douglas but I still think the Falcons can’t afford to spend first round money at the RB postiion. Too many needs at OLB, DE/DT, CB, OL, WR. I’m fine with ddrafting a RB late but we you just can’t draft situational/backup players i nthe first round unless you are an elite team.

Shorty

February 26th, 2010
8:30 am

you can’t draft a DE/LB in the 2nd round because we traded that to KC for Tony Gonzalez. It depends on whether or not jerious norwood can stay healthy all year without getting hurt.

Walker, Texas Ranger

February 26th, 2010
8:31 am

McCluster will be available in the 4th or 5th round for a reason. I like the idea of trading Turner to the Raiders. Maybe for Asomugha or their 1st Rd pick. Big backs are a dime a dozen with a life span of 4-5 years, trade him and pickup someone in the 3rd round like Dwyer, Best or the guy from Oregon.

Tailback U

February 26th, 2010
8:32 am

Mark
One more thing on my point is that there is not likely going to
be a clearcut no risk guy defensive player sitting there to be
taken ( Weatherspoon perhaps ) and its in that circumstance that
a an offensive player of Spiller’s ability has to be seriously
considered.

Ivan Vasilii Vladivostok, aka "Pasha dat a$$"

February 26th, 2010
8:37 am

Yeah, now that i think about it; trade Turner to the Raiders for 1st round pick, trade Norwood to get another 3rd round pick, combine those later round picks to get a 2nd rounder.

It just seems after the 4th round, the chances of making the team or staying with it after 1 season drop off dramatically. There are only so many Tom Bradys.

I'm Gumby, dammit!!

February 26th, 2010
8:37 am

35th?? As much as we need more help on defense, I say, if he’s still available (I would be shocked if he was), you have to take Spiller. From what I’ve seen, he’s better than Percy or that Kardashian kid, more like Chris Johnson good.

cosmos

February 26th, 2010
8:38 am

If Spiller is available at 19 you definitely take him. In fact, I would move up to take him a couple of slots earlier. He has Percy Harvey type ability and Norwood doesn’t seem to have the durability. He’s injured too often.

blord

February 26th, 2010
8:39 am

I would run to turn the card in if CJ is available. Our offense has talent but it needs a spark. The arguements against Spiller or as follows:
1. We have a Rb. My counter to this is any team that drafts Spiller would need to have a starting RB already. He is not an every down back but he is a guy that in some role can play even more snaps a game then Turner possibly. He can line up in the slot. Run out of the backfield. Run a wildcat. Return punts. Return kickoffs. He also will be a tremendous help on 3rd and long since Turner isn’t much of a reciever. Spiller is a guy that will cause defenses to wet their pants.
2) We need Defensive help. I agree with this and I also agree we need to build through the draft but we have to be careful with how much youth we have on defense. Are we really wanting to start a second year corner in Owens and a rookie we draft? If Moore ends up starting at Safety as suggested then that is a lot of youth out there. I also agree we need a DE but we have drafted one each of the last couple of years. Maybe neither of these guys drafted are the full time answer and if that is the case maybe we should go DE. It takes time for a DE to develop so if we draft one I still don’t think we will get as much boom as we would with Spiller. At linebacker which is also a need there is said to be a lot of depth in this draft so it can be addressed outside the 1st rd even though I really like Spoon.

Just my 2 cents.

bill_in_atl

February 26th, 2010
8:39 am

It seems to me that to get to the Super Bowl the Falcons will need to outscore the Saints. No matter who Atlanta drafts for signs in free agency I don’t see any possibility of shutting down their offense any time soon. CJ Spiller could very well be the missing piece to the offense that allows the Falcons to keep up with the Saints offensively.

For those who say to just take McCluster in a later round I ask you this: If he’s just as good as CJ then why will he be available in a later round? How many of you guys think you really know more about this than all 32 NFL GMs and their hordes of well-paid assistants? He may turn out to be an NFL HOF player, but none of you know more than TD or any of the other NFL GMs so stop being silly with that type of comment.

The point made by smittydawg should not be ignored. This guy looks to be every bit the player that Bush and Harvin are and look at how their respective teams are faring. I’d take him with the pick unless some guy you have rated as a top 5 player happens to fall to you

AndyC

February 26th, 2010
8:44 am

The Falcons can only take Spiller, or any other offensive player, if all of their defensive picks get taken ahead of them. There is too much of a need on defense.

Banks McFadden

February 26th, 2010
8:44 am

I always chuckle at the Spiller durability argument. Mark, you point out that he left the game with Turf Toe in Tampa. True, but he returned and was SENSATIONAL. Last time I checked he was named the MVP. Not bad for being injured and on the losing end of things. This guy played ALL year with turf toe and never missed any real time. Anybody who has had that injury can tell you it is excruciating…yet he put up stupid numbers in spite of it. By the way, don’t forget Matt Ryan had the same injury and did miss significant time. Truth is, this guy is tough as nails and I am going to predict he is more than just Reggie Bush lite.

[...] Dave the Falconer wrote a very interesting post today.   Here’s a quick excerpt:Mark Bradley of the AJC wants to know how Atlanta Falcons fans would feel about their team drafting CJ Spiller of Clemson. [...]

ATL

February 26th, 2010
8:48 am

Get him! He can run and catch and is fast as hell!

IceFan

February 26th, 2010
8:52 am

Torn a little on this one. I kind of hope he’s gone by the time we pick at 19th, but if he’s there I think we have to take him. I agree that McCluster is maybe just as good, but we don’t have a 2nd round pick and he will be gone by the time we pick again. He’s not a secret anymore.

It’s no surprise that we really need help on both lines, but this guy could be a real weapon in multiple positions. If it’s not him, I would not be the least bit surprised if Dimitroff takes the best offensive weapon available at 19.

say a prayer for the falcons

February 26th, 2010
8:52 am

mike Gee

February 26th, 2010
8:53 am

I see all the points of everyone’s arguments and I agree with all to a certain degree. In the end, explosive playmakers can make both sides of the ball better as well as add to your special teams punch. Spiller does that, and Douglass does not. We are drafting DE’s annually like Detroit drafts receivers, in the end we have nothing (paging Jamaal, please pick up the red courtesy phone) to show for it in the way of game changers. In the end, I see Spiller as a Felix Jones type…not durable, exciting but won’t be around much to show it on sundays. Not wishing the kid bad luck…but we can trade down, get more help on D and find another gem. It what Dimitrioff does, this is his time of year!
Roll Tide!

IceFan

February 26th, 2010
8:56 am

And I second the motion from before about letting Dimitroff call overtime coin flips. 2 for 2 baby!

Sadly, there are still plenty of morons out there that probably wish he had lost the flip with the Chiefs in ‘08 so they could have drafted Matty Ice. Glen Dorsey has been awesome, right?

DirtyByrd Atl

February 26th, 2010
8:56 am

AS much as we NEED a Defensive Anchor, & if CJ Spiller is there @ 19, we better bite & bite HARD. This guy outta Clemson is amazing & a half, a complete beast & backing up Michael Turner, we would have our Lighting to our Thunder…we can ALWAYS upgrade the D via free agency & trades but I PRAY TD doesnt pass on this kid!

F-105 Thunderchief

February 26th, 2010
8:57 am

I’d go O-line if there is first-round talent available there.

David

February 26th, 2010
8:58 am

Spiller played in the ACC… Falcons should only draft SEC players.

SOUTH GA DAWG FAN

February 26th, 2010
9:00 am

yes if he is still there take him unless he they believe he will be as injured as norwood. I like norwood but spillar is a better talent i think . that offense was not as explosive as it should have been I know there were many many injuries , so what if turner gets hurt again or if he is the turner from the first part of last season then we will need the help. ball possesion and rush the passer . matriculate the ball down the field and plant the other QB in the dirt/turf whatever the case may be

coachx

February 26th, 2010
9:02 am

Spiller is the ONLE offensive player I would draft (if he falls to us).

If not snag the best CB, OLB, or DL that you can.

EW

February 26th, 2010
9:03 am

Take him. The NFL is slowly moving towards the FFL (Flag Football League). It’s all about getting athletes the ball in space and letting them make plays. He looks like he would be able to make an impact immediately in the return game while he acclimates to the offense as well.

Blue

February 26th, 2010
9:04 am

I disagree vehemently that Norwood “approximates Spiller”. If you are talking in terms of raw speed…maybe. But there is NOTHING about Norwood from a performance, style, toughness in how he runs the ball standpoint that approximates Spiller.

blord

February 26th, 2010
9:06 am

Heck CJ does it all anyway so he would probably be our best cover corner as well. :) We always hear the Defense wins championships but history shows that not to always be the case. In the modern era of FA it seems that you just need to be great at something. Examples of the Rams and the Saints on offense and on D the Ravens. You can win by being great on offense if you just have a D that creates turnovers like the Saints did. With the speed we now have on D I think we are close to having that type of defense. We have a short window it appears to be Great on offense. Gonzo only has a couple of years left and as much as Turner gets used he probably only has a 3 or 4 year window. Spiller, HD, Turner, Ryan, Gonzo, White would be a offense to be feared IMO. We will have to outscore the Saints for the next few years because Breez can take apart even good defenses.

fred

February 26th, 2010
9:07 am

as a clemson fan u better take cj !!! mabe on get jacby ford he can catch and run with cj!!!

Ramon

February 26th, 2010
9:10 am

Mike Jay, do you remember where Randy Moss was drafted?

Survey Says

February 26th, 2010
9:11 am

Take him. It’s a no brainer.

Let's Go

February 26th, 2010
9:11 am

CJ Spiller is twice the player Reggie Bush is. Bush was great in college but he’s never been dedicated to the game and his character is an issue. Spiller is not that type of player, he has always been team first and is a first class citizen. For those that wonder if he is an every down back, he’s 5-11 195 lbs. Chris Johnson is 5-11 200 lbs but when he came out of college many of the so called experts said he was not an every down back. Also, Michael Turner is only signed for 2 more years and after this year you have to question his durability at age 28. All great teams today have 2 very good running backs (some 3) and honestly I would rather the Falcons take a chance on a RB in the 1st round than go out and spend money to over pay for LT or Brian Westbrook.

Boo

February 26th, 2010
9:12 am

Yes! Take Spiller

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
9:15 am

So: More support for Spiller, I note.

Not Don Waddell

February 26th, 2010
9:16 am

You have to take Spiller if he is still available. Look at the Colts. They have consistently had the best offense in the NFL the last decade, yet, what do they keep drafting? Offensive players.

If Spiller is there, he will provide this offense a spark that they missed last year with Norwood’s regression and Harry Douglas’ injury. He would provide an amazing 1-2 punch with Turner, matched only by Stewart/Williams in Charlotte and AP/Chester Taylor in Minnesota.

This is a no-brainer if Spiller is still available.

The one caveat is that if Spiller is there, and another team is desperate to have him, we could leverage the pick and get a later 1st round and a 2nd rounder. That is the only other possible scenario of Spiller falls to Atlanta.

I don’t see any way he is still there, though.

vafalconfan

February 26th, 2010
9:18 am

Why not just replace Mularkey and then we won’t have to worry about running “reverses”..

Dimitroffs venting spleen

February 26th, 2010
9:19 am

Taking Spiller would be nuts. I love everybody comparing him to Reggie Bush, and Percy Harvin. Those guys were the best offensive players to come out of college when they were drafted. You can’t say that about Spiller. Yes Spiller was exciting but I don’t see that talent translating to the NFL. Good defenses shut him down. There are plenty of guys available that have his speed and you don’t draft a “situational” player in the 1st round. You HAVE to get a starter that addresses a need. Spiller would be a luxury, one the Falcons can’t afford. The running back pool is deep and you can get quality deep in the draft. If you say you want a running back, draft Ben Tate from Auburn in the 3rd or 4th rounds. Tate is big, durable and deceptively fast. He’s big enough to pound the middle and fast enough to run away from DB’s when he gets in the open field. He would be a great back up to Turner.

waynester

February 26th, 2010
9:20 am

I understand WANTING Spiller, but unless we trade up we won’t be able to GET Spiller. There’s a reason most mocks have him going to SF or SEA. They’re desperate for offensive firepower to build their new offenses around, we’re not. I’m all for cutting deals and trading around– but Down, not Up.
The 2nd-early 4th is amazingly loaded with talent, but due to team needs, they’re not going to fall to us at our current spots. TD has , so far, targeted specific guys and been willing to go after them. Those who say he’ll really earn his salary this draft are right on the $$$!

Ross

February 26th, 2010
9:21 am

I would prefer to addresslinebac or defensive line, but if he is there, I could get behind the pick, if they were to let Norwood go. Having both would be extremely redundant.

Lost KSU fan

February 26th, 2010
9:21 am

I’m all for making the selection of the player that is going to make the most impact. I don’t think there is any defensive player we have a chance at drafting that could make as big of an impact as Spiller can for the Falcon offense and special teams.

Sonny Clusters

February 26th, 2010
9:22 am

We was reading the posts and noticed the mention of McClusters from Mississippi. We was just noticing.

mountain_jim

February 26th, 2010
9:22 am

Mularkey needs to include the screen game big-time if they are not going to upgrade the oline – and I don’t see a DE or CB likely worth that pick so yes take Spiller – our offense was not as good as expected and needs more playmakers.

timthebrave

February 26th, 2010
9:23 am

He won’t be on the board when we pick but whenever you can get top 10 talent at #20 pick you got to do it

Falcon4Life

February 26th, 2010
9:24 am

To early to make that decision. Do we sign Peppers or Kampman? Bodden or Robinson? Do we make a trade or two to fill some of these needs? We need a DE, CB, OLB and a RB/PR/KR (Norwood replacement). I think Norwoods injuries have made him expendable so we will need a guy like Spiller. If we cant land Spiller, then I would love to get McCluster but mark my words, he wont last past the second round!!

Greg

February 26th, 2010
9:25 am

Mark, Spiller would be a situational back for the Falcons, as you yourself say. I say “no” to a No. 1 pick for a merely situational player, especially as we have no No. 2 pick this year. Snelling looks very good right now. The backfield is way down the list of needs. Got to get a pass rush going or we’re toast again. That is the No. 1 priority.

Sonny Clusters

February 26th, 2010
9:25 am

Clusters love football but not as much as baseball. We was wondering if Jeff was going to Sea World while he is down in Florida? Do you know, Mark? We was at Sea World once and was looking down in the tank and saw that big killer whale looking back right at us and we decided to go do something else.

Benjamin

February 26th, 2010
9:27 am

I’m a close Clemson observer — best friend is an alumni, and I go to two-three games a year with him — and a huge fan of Spiller, but I’m not sure I’d take him if there were a quality DE or CB on the board. He will be a solid player in the league, though.

We really need to revamp our defense, if possible.

Benjamin

February 26th, 2010
9:27 am

lol Clusters…

Benjamin

February 26th, 2010
9:30 am

If we dealt Turner for the guy from the Raiders whose name I won’t even attempt to type — and it’s not Jamarcus Russell ;) — then I’d be on board with drafting CJ. That’d seal two areas of significant need.

They won’t take Michael for their CB, though.

Mike Jay

February 26th, 2010
9:30 am

Ramon,

Moss was drafted were he was because of off the field issues iirc. Spiller does not have those concerns so if he is a ‘rare talent’ than why is he slipping to 19?

SC Smith

February 26th, 2010
9:34 am

You just can’t draft for position. Always pick the best player except maybe at QB for us. What’s the use in paying 1st round money to a average player or maybe a never will player. Go for the best possible player. See Colts, Patriots, Steelers, ect……

thunderbull56

February 26th, 2010
9:35 am

I wood. Can’t have too many weapons in you arsenal. Let Jriotous breakout in someone else’s hurt list.

waynester

February 26th, 2010
9:38 am

Doesn’t Dimitroff just FEEL like a Superbowl type guy? All it takes is Talent, Hard Work and Luck and he seems to have it all. The team is starting to show those qualities now, too. Last season it was N.O. with all the Luck– hopefully, next season it’ll be our year to put all 3 together to produce a championship. This is IMHO TD’s most challenging Draft so far. In years 1&2, the needs were obvious and with the exception of Baker the perfect player to match those needs was available precisely where we picked. That’s not the case this time. Our team needs are less obvious and the players that would best suit those needs are scattered all over the board. This one will show us TD’s true mettle as a Draftmaster!

Charlie

February 26th, 2010
9:39 am

I’d rather the Falcons draft Jon Dwyer than CJ Spiller. I’d be perfectly happy trading Turner for a shutdown corner. Good running backs are a product of the system. Shutdown corners are more rare. See Clinton Portis for Champ Bailey.

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
9:41 am

If you trade Turner, Benjamin, you wouldn’t have an every-down back. Because Spiller isn’t one.

GovClintonTyree

February 26th, 2010
9:43 am

Love Spiller, but not what the Falcons need. Go defense.

blord

February 26th, 2010
9:43 am

Who are we kiddin…he will be gone before we pick anyway! Nice to dream but I am only getting excited about the idea only to be disappointed I think. Now back to reality.

nickj0321

February 26th, 2010
9:45 am

NONONONONONONONONONOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Smitty

February 26th, 2010
9:46 am

I have to believe that TD knows exactly who the Falcons need to pick at 19 and it has totally to do with the switch to a 3-4 and that its a combo DE/OLB who will give them the pass rush they need to make their D backs improved

Ivan Vasilii Vladivostok, aka "Pasha dat a$$"

February 26th, 2010
9:48 am

Mark, what numerically constitutes an every down back versus someone like Spiller? I guess I don’t understand the rationale, seems like it’s “just something you have”. Is Snelling an every down guy? Can you rotate Spiller and Snelling and get FA’s as backups and special team guys?

Do you think Turner could be traded for a high 1st round pick to get Haden?

collegeballfan

February 26th, 2010
9:48 am

Take Spiller if he is there. Kickoffs, punt returns, passes out of backfield, passes as slot, runs out of backfield, the guy has no limits as a threat. Every opposing defense will need to account for him. Opens up the offense even more. White, Gonzalez, Turner & Spiller, who are you going to double? Four game breakers on the field at the same time. Throw Douglas out there and there is even more gravy on your biscuit.

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
9:48 am

I don’t think the Falcons can trade Turner. This is a ball-control offense, and he’s the controller.

HGN

February 26th, 2010
9:49 am

Mark, you probably was a mischievous and bad little kid in your childhood because you sure know to start a fight…. But we must not take our eyes off the ball , we must draft a player on the defensive side of the line. Taking CJ Spiller, who will not start his first year because we have Turner, should not be considered. WE NEED STARTERS. And those starters have to be on the defensive side. As tempting as it may be, taking Spiller would be a mistake. We do not have a 2nd round pick to jump back in to address our defensive needs. We must do it with that 19th pick.

I too like Spiller, but he is a luxury right now that we cannot afford. We must address our needs first. And defense is where our top needs are. I hope TD sticks to this being another Needs Draft and don’t turn it into a Wants Draft.

mikie g.

February 26th, 2010
9:50 am

YES. TAKE SPILLER!! HE IS THE FASTEST MAN AROUND THE CORNER AND ACCELERATING DOWNFIELD THAT I HAVE EVER SEEN. TAKE HIM. PLEASE.

GetwhatUpayfor

February 26th, 2010
9:54 am

Yes, I’d like to see Spiller in a Falcons uniform but I’d also have to go with the GM’s decision. He knows whats best for team. Go Falcons.

Sonny Clusters

February 26th, 2010
9:59 am

They is fast and they is FAST. We was FAST. Running with a ball is something a Clusters could always do. We was running right after we was babies and sometimes we’d get stopped and asked if we was old enough to be running a football like that. We wasn’t but we was still running with the ball. When we was playing ball back in school we was many times expected to go all the way when we touched the ball. We’d line up and wait for the ball and then we’d run in behind Stinky Wintes and not stop until we heard the whistle. We scored a lot that way. We was state championship.

SC Ace

February 26th, 2010
9:59 am

I’m not a Clemson fan (quite the opposite) but live in that area and saw a lot of Spiller. The Falcons canNOT pass him up if he’s there. Here’s why:

* He is explosive – the kind of guy who can break the big play anytime he touches the ball.

* It seems that NFL teams are increasingly utilizing 2-back systems or rotations (much to the chagrin of fantasy football people). So having 2 solid options is great. Plus – as Senor Bradley has stated, it’s a ball control offense and so it’s wise to be stacked at the position.

* He’d be an asset in the passing game (and a serious mismatch for a linebacker in coverage)

* He adds game-changing potential to the return game

* He has great intangibles – high character guy with great leadership

Fal-Can

February 26th, 2010
9:59 am

They need to draft that safety/DB out of Texas…the one the clown on NFL network ranks ahead of Eric Berry….should be avaiable in the middle to semi- late(pick22) first round

BigHittas

February 26th, 2010
10:01 am

NThompson

February 26th, 2010
10:02 am

Heck yeah! I’ll become a Falcons fan if they pick him up!!

SMITTYSTHEMAN

February 26th, 2010
10:07 am

Watching Spiller play the last couple of years, to me it’s a no-brainer. You have to get him if he’s available. Mark, your column about Dimitroff maybe not taking a DB (or even any defensive player)made sense. Get Peria and the other injured guys back and it will be a huge upgrade on defense. I’ve been a Norwood supporter since he’s been here, but you can breathe on him and he’ll go down. The weakest and skinniest legs on an NFL running bak I’ve ever seen. And Turner is a bruiser that needs a better complement than Norwood. Spiller is the answer on offense and as a return man. Again, in my mind it’s a no-brainer. GET HIM!

IceFan

February 26th, 2010
10:09 am

Sonny Clusters,

I seriously doubt you and Dexter McCluster are of any relation, but I was wondering if you had heard about any possible affinity for DQ out of Dexter’s camp.

A Different Opinion

February 26th, 2010
10:09 am

And I ask the age old question…..”If nobody’s there to watch him, did he really get drafted”? And the really relevent question……”Does anybody really care”?

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
10:10 am

Absolutely draft Spiller if he’s still there. The guy is a game-changer and you don’t get to draft those very often.

The guy split carries for 3 years at Clemson ’til he was THE man and then had an incredible senior year. He catches the ball, he returns, he runs the ball….a lot of ways to get him the rock. Give him 7 or 8 carries a game, throw 2 or 3 to him, and let him return kickoffs. I love my chances of seeing him take one of those touches to the house.

Because he split carries, he hasn’t taken as much pounding as a lot of college feature backs.

This is a no-brainer to me. Trade Norwood and a draft pick to maybe recoup that lost 2nd rounder. Those that think we’re going to draft a starter at pick 19 at either CB or DE are probably kidding themselves.

Hollywould

February 26th, 2010
10:10 am

Get Spiller and turn him into a corner.

lazydawg

February 26th, 2010
10:10 am

Spiller is a very talented RB ,but you can find that in the 4th or 5th round for the type back we will need or even free-agency(Westbrook).The Falcons need Defense to be the theme this draft to get to the promised land.Offense is the sexy pick but the playoff pick is defense.

suwaneedawg

February 26th, 2010
10:11 am

You win championships with defense. Right now Mark the importance to get a solid de and cb out weighs Spiller. Great choice if we did not have these holes to fill.

WR

February 26th, 2010
10:15 am

If Spiller is there the Falcons should consider him seriously. The why part, Turner, his fullback Muhgelli and Spiller can be on the field at the same time. Spiller can line up in the backfield or split out wide, same as Harvin. Plenty of people have talked about improved protection for Ryan, but how much protection does adding an explosive player thats coming out of the back field with slot abilities add, plenty. The premiere rushers in the league have to take serious notice of Spiller upon rushing the QB, which slows down their ability to rush, defensive schemes have to take serious notice of Spiller, which changes there aggressiveness. Norwood and Spiller are similar yes, but Spiller is a game changer, always has been. The argument can be made that Norwood is not used properly, but between three coaches sometimes you have to wonder if its Norwood. Spiller may not be an everydown back, but he is good between the tackles, Norwood is not, never has been, never will be. Then you go on to body type for the position, Norwood’s skinny legs hurt him more then anything, Spiller is proportional. Look at the Saints for the last point of view, specifically Reggie Bush, Bush has been a game changer for that team and he is not an everydown back. There’s a big difference between a “home run hitter” and a “game changer”, the first one has the ability to hit you for a big play at any given time, the latter will hit you for a big play at some point. Teams prepare for the two differently also, teams focus on not allowing the home run hitter to get a home run, teams try to contain and limit the explosive plays of the game changer, because they known at some point its going to happen.

Dawg-Catcher

February 26th, 2010
10:15 am

I would have to say NO here for one simple reason – Spiller would not start or be an every down back for this team for at least a couple of years. IMHO, a first round pick should have the ability to, and be NEEDED to, start at some point as an every down player in his first year (that may end up not actually happening but at least the thought should be that it could when you draft). If CJ is another Norwood, I would pass (even if they decide to let Norwood go and are looking for his replacement via the draft, we are still talking about a backup type in Round 1)

DDawgDavis

February 26th, 2010
10:17 am

Get Spiller and turn him into a ball hawking Safety.

Are we just discussing Spiller to appeal to the fan base of the Falcons/AJC? Spiller will be a good player, but he will not be as good as Michael Turner is now. Someone mentioned ball control and Turner is that, because he can also break one with that speed. I saw it every Sunday, tackled by three or four dudes and bust off for 20 more yards. Spiller won’t contribute that till year three. The time is now for the Falcons!

Go DEFENSE! Stay away from CBs under 5′11 because we have like six of them on the roster. Draft Taylor Mays (not backing down from this one), Carlos Dunlap, Kindle, Witherspoon, etc. In round three on go with Myron Rolle or DBs over 6′0″. You’re are not going to find the Revis/Bailey type shutdown CB in this crowd. Abandon that idea, go with with bolstering our DL or LB or Taylor Mays.

WR

February 26th, 2010
10:19 am

TommyP, said it best, game changer, they don’t come around often, there’s not a game changing CB, DE, that will be available at the Falcons pick, which we now known is number 19, Sean Weatherspoon may be a game changing OLB though, so between he and Spiller if Spiller is there, this is where the Falcons should have the most conflict. Not at any other position.

AthensDog/Falcon

February 26th, 2010
10:19 am

I would say that Spiller is an impressive back, and I certainly agree that the offense dropped off some last year. I think it seems obvious that the offense dropped off because Turner missed so much time with his injury. The offense is based on pounding the ball, and then play action off of that. It enabled Ryan to have a nice rookie year, and last year we saw how a drop off in one area (running) affects another area (passing). Assuming Turner stays healthy, the offense will return to form if we can keep the line intact. If he’s hurt, Spiller would help, but I don’t see drafting him as your #1 ‘just in case’ Turner gets hurt.
Maybe the Raiders would take Turner for their first pick…I mean they just made their kicker the second highest player on their team so they are obviously not dealing in reality. Heck, I’d almost trade Turner straight up for their cornerback with the strange name.

DirtyByrd Atl

February 26th, 2010
10:21 am

CJ Spiller would be the ‘change of pace back’ kinda like LenDale White & Chris Johnson or DeAngelo Williams & Jonhathan Stewart in ‘08-’09. It would keep defenses on there heels, & with other weapons like Tony Go, Roddy, & Harry Douglass comin back 4rm injury, I think this would be a VERY POTENT offense

ATL Fan

February 26th, 2010
10:21 am

If Houston wants him, swap our number one and three for thier number one and number two. We have more pressing needs than what CJ could fill. No disrespect of CJ, but he could be more valuable to us as a trade. We need LB, CB, & OL help more than punt returner and wide out.

Big Al

February 26th, 2010
10:28 am

Yes, taking Spiller here is the sexy pick. But we obviously need WAY more help on the defensive side of the ball. It all depends on whether there is a cornerback or D-lineman that T.D. and Co. are in love with at 19. If so, take that guy. If not, take Spillers. He seems to b a dynamic gamechanger.

Big Al

February 26th, 2010
10:30 am

Also, ATL Fan makes a very good point of possibly using the pick for a trade if someone else (Texans?) wants Spiller and he’s available.

Larry

February 26th, 2010
10:30 am

No. These guys list the potential draft picks in this order for a reason. We dont need an offensive skill specialist that is going to take a couple years to develop. We need speed on defense that can make an immediate impact. Spiller is good, but adding him means we blow a high defensive draft pick and add a new dimension to an offense that Noodle Arm already struggles with. No Dice.

ddawgdavis

February 26th, 2010
10:36 am

Falcons interview Iupati from Idaho at the Combine. I would love this pick, despite my over the top request for Defense. Iupati during his interview used the word “Destroy” to represent his playing style. Sign him now!

SCBird

February 26th, 2010
10:39 am

As a SC Gamecock grad, I’m saying YES! The guy is a gamechanger….Eric Metcalf (x) 2!!!!

Mac Dawggy

February 26th, 2010
10:39 am

While Spiller is certainly interesting, i beleive you have to shore up the defense and score in the second round on offense. As someone stated earlier, the 19th pick for a back that does not play every down is very expensive. Win Championships with D.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
10:40 am

“Spiller won’t contribute that ’til year 3.”??????????

Really? Not year 1, not year 2, but year 3, huh?

You’re drafting Taylor Mays, a safety that appears to be a linebacker? No thanks.

Turner was hurt last year and we saw how the Falcons performed without him. Having Spiller would not only add Chris Johnson-like gamebreaking abilities but would also spell Turner from having to carry the ball so much.

Let’s see…off the top of my head, Chris Johnson and Ray Rice were both NOT supposed to be feature backs (from what a lot of people said). They’re now 2 of the best backs in the NFL.

Sonny Clusters

February 26th, 2010
10:41 am

IceFan, if McClusters is picked by the Atlanta Falcons we will personally invite him to Dairy Queen. We was thinking he probably already knows about DQ though. Not everybody knows that the Midnight Truffle Blizzard is Blizzard of the Month – rich truffles and dark fudge blended with creamy vanilla soft serve and we always request some clusters of nuts and some cherries. They pretty much let us have our Dairy Queen any way we like it. We was state championship.

Tom

February 26th, 2010
10:41 am

Absolutely take CJ!

skip

February 26th, 2010
10:42 am

Spiller is talanted but not an every down back. Given the Falcons needs on defense there is no way they should take him with the 19th pick.

Lowcountry Bulldawg

February 26th, 2010
10:42 am

You would have to take CJ. Like was mentioned it gives the Falcons the 1-2 punch and Spiller also adds another dynamic in the way he catches the ball out of the backfield. How many wheel routes did we see him breaking for 40 plus yards this season?

Yes the defense is of concern, but the Saints didn’t win the Super Bowl with the Ravens defense. They won it with a great QB and a phenomenal offense.

Spiller has the opportunity to be for the Falcons what Reggie Bush is for the Saints. A multi role player in Running, Receiving and in the Return Game.

Also it was mentioned Westbrook? The Falcons need a young big play threat, not a 30 injury risk.

Sam

February 26th, 2010
10:43 am

Draft CJ Spiller! Look at the two teams who made it to the Super Bowl this year – Colts vs Saints – both teams are offensive powerhouses with B- defenses.

As a long time season ticket holder I know the Falcons defense was almost their last year if it was not for injuries to key DL and CB players. Based on that point, the Falcons can use several of their 3rd round picks on DE/OLB/CB plus resign Brain Williams and a vet DE that will make the secondary better overnight. Do you remember how the “hurt” Falcons Defense went toe for toe with the now Super Bowl Champion Saints…our defense is not as bad as advertised….we just need more nasty on the DL/CB spots.

However, our offense did not live up to the preseason billing given by every NFL expert/fan but I blame that on the injuries suffered on that side of the ball plus the fact we HAVE NO GAME CHANGERS beside White,Turner and Gonzalez.

Watch this CJ Spiller highlight on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Wf0kC-w9lU

Could you honestly say you would not draft his explosive offense ability over a project at DE/CB next season.

Bruce Pickens His Nose

February 26th, 2010
10:44 am

I gree, we should sign that Sonny McClusters fellow.

Ivan Vasilii Vladivostok, aka "Pasha dat a$$"

February 26th, 2010
10:44 am

I like hearing about he Tackle from Idaho; Baker is not proven yet, except that he gets hurt.

Sugarbaby

February 26th, 2010
10:45 am

We have far more pressing needs. C.J. is terrific – but the Falcons have NEEDS.

Brandon2k3

February 26th, 2010
10:50 am

As we all seen this year, it doesn’t take an excellent D-fense to win the Super Bowl. Although I agree we can upgrade. But how could we possibly pass up on a RB like Spiller. You can use him out the back field for running and throwing. To be a top team in the league you can never have enough talent. It would be safe to go with a RB because you never know how a CB will turn out or when he will develope. It doesn’t take too much to be a RB besides taking all of those hits, and Norwood is beat up and on the sideline almost every year and he’s not even the starting RB. Turner, Spiller and Snelling would be a good Trio of backs. I say upgrade the RB(draft) and WR position(through Free Agency). I agree with some that we need a BIG stud for the middle and try to upgrade the OLB and CB postion.( The saints were not excellent on defense they just had a offense that couldn’t be stop.) By the way we beat the number 1 defense which was the Jets because they had no offense to put any points up. What’s the use of having a top defense when your offense can’t put up any points. I don’t know what kind of offense people were looking at with the falcons this past season, but they didn’t look so good to me. Blame it on the injuries, but that’s a part of the game and will always be. That’s what happened to our RB postion, so why not add a guy like Spiller. He’s better than Norwood. Go Falcons!!!!!

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
10:52 am

The 19th pick in the draft will not start at DE. Odds are that you won’t get a starting CB at that spot, either.

Who is the face of the Falcons franchise? It’s one of two players: Ryan or Turner. Let’s give them more weapons to succeed.

You can get a backup CB or DE in later rounds. I keep reading how good the backup DEs we have are….I’m not sure how good they are but I am sure they were later draft picks.

You know, we DO have free agency to fill those holes at CB and DE. If you have an urgent need, you should fill it with a veteran that is capable of stepping in immediately.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 26th, 2010
10:55 am

The answer to that question lies in who is available on defense. And at that moment when the Falcons can see what defensive players are there, you say to yourself, will any of these defensive players affect the outcome of games more than CJ Spiller could. And remember, Spiller could make an impact on two thirds of the game (offense AND special teams).

But to that point, defense IS the Falcons most pressing area to fix. And the option to take Spiller is further complicated by not having any 2nd round picks. So if you pick Spiller, you have to wait until the 3rd round to start addressing your pass rush or secondary needs. I don’t know if the Falcons can afford to wait to the 3rd to get some help at DE or CB.

Free Tibetan Agency

February 26th, 2010
10:56 am

Forget drafting a CB with the 19th pick. With Owens on the other side, you’d have a rookie and a 2nd year player on the field. That spells burn. If we address this need, we need to do it in free agency; someone with experience to balance out the youth.

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
10:57 am

They should absolutely take him, but he won’t be available why do ya think Banks thinks Spiller will fall this far?

The Falcons need to keep Turners carriers per season around 300, after he had 370+ the next year suffered just like the curse predicted.

Steve From Dalton

February 26th, 2010
10:58 am

where is the draft the deepest? RB or DB? Falcons could still get value in the 3rd and 4th rounds

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
11:00 am

Aren’t the Falcon’s lucky in these coin tosses, I bet they chose heads.

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
11:01 am

It was either heads or tails, I’m guessing, Ted M. But I’m only guessing.

chzbykr

February 26th, 2010
11:03 am

Earl Thomas is a beast in the defensive backfield. His body size and abilities translate to CB just as well as safety. The guy is a ball hawk with excellent range. Just a redshirt sophmore so young and will only get better; but very good right now. Spiller would be a situational player and a very good one but Thomas is every down db who will control one side of the field.

Delbert D.

February 26th, 2010
11:05 am

Why would they spend their top pick on a part-time/special teams player? That is about number 12 on their list of needs.

Hayseed Dixie

February 26th, 2010
11:07 am

I’ve seen Spiller play in person a couple of times- he’s a strong, fast, athletic freak who hates to lose.

At the ACC championship game all I was thinking was about Spiller in the NFL, not Dwyer. And I love Dwyer. I’d love to see him in a Falcons uniform. The kid could do everything.

I dunno, what’s the over/under on the Falcons DBs and/or overall defense making a significant jump in ability over the offseason?

andre

February 26th, 2010
11:07 am

i’m all for it. They get leigh bodden in free agency so forget a corner.

Sonny Clusters

February 26th, 2010
11:11 am

Once, we called heads on a coin flip and the coin hit the ground and spun around a couple times and then just stopped right there on its edge between two blades of grass. We was quick to tell the ref that we could see the heads and those boys from Cobb County was just as quick to say they could see the tails. We was first though to jump up in the air and land right next to that coin and let it fall down on its tails side and there was the heads sticking up for all to see. Being quick like that is a Clusters trademark. Those Cobb County boys didn’t like it a bit but they couldn’t argue that the heads was showing. Stinky Wintes was out there with us for the coin flip and most everybody was ready to go on back to the sidelines and not have to be standing out there with Stinky Wintes.

WR

February 26th, 2010
11:15 am

Everyone believes the more pressing matter is defense, no fan of the Falcons or no supposed expert will disagree, but consider, by going defense, we’re assuming that the Falcons are a player away from Superbowl contention, thats the point right. At DE the Falcons have two young, good players developing, at CB the Falcons have a wealth of youth that are showing improvement, they have two young developing OLBs, and one thats long in the teeth. At DT they have young and talented players, one injured and lost for the season, one thats been one of there most dominate players and two others who are very young but showed enormous improvement as the season went along. If the Falcons had a top five pick of course you go defense a potential elite player can be found there, picking in the 19th slot there’s not many elite defensive players of need and so far only one that is considered a game changer and he’s on offense. Looking for quick results rarely lead to fast rewards, but building toward rewards often leads to obtaining the rewards. Some say Spiller is the sexy pick, but defense is the sexy pick if you understand sexy, sexy is about what is attention grabbing, in this case defense is, but complete is about whats best for you in the long haul.

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
11:15 am

ESPN had a segment on Spiller and a few other guys yesterday who called them selves the Freaks. It was pretty good, they have been training hard.

Sonny Clusters

February 26th, 2010
11:16 am

“Lemon Girl Scout Cookies may be Stinky” – AJC

Lots of talk about Stinky in the AJC today. Stinky Wintes and now Stinky Girl Scout cookies. The best thing to do if you crave a snack is go to the Dairy Queen.

DaveDawg

February 26th, 2010
11:16 am

Heck yes. He’ll be the top back in the league inside of two seasons. You just can’t pass on that.

truth

February 26th, 2010
11:18 am

Depends who is left from the defensive side of the ball. If the one TD and MS wanted to be on their defense is there at 19 I say take him,if not and Spiller is there, I say take Spiller.

JL Burke

February 26th, 2010
11:19 am

Spiller is never going to be the top back in the league because he’s not an every-down back. A push rush will make the biggest impact for the Falcons this season. They can get a good pass-rushing defensive end at 19.

Free Tibetan Agency

February 26th, 2010
11:20 am

And while we’re not on the subject, I still don’t understand why so many people think that last year’s draft was a bust. Both Jerry and Moore went down with injuries before any of us could see what kind of long-term impact they could make. Frankly, I think last year’s draft was phenomenal. Give it time, folks.

Larry

February 26th, 2010
11:21 am

this is all a moot point. he’s not gonna be there for the taking. so we might as well discuss drafting papa smurf or an alpaca.

/Alpaca out of nowhere strips the ball and scoops it up!!!!! and he’s going in for the score!!!!

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
11:21 am

since Spiller will NOT be available at 19 the Falcon should take Carlos Dunlap. Provided he show a modicum of integrity at combine and I think he will.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
11:29 am

I don’t think Dunlap will be there at 19.

Mark Bradley: (and others that keep saying Spiller isn’t an “every down back”) Tell me why you KNOW he’s not an everyday back.

Chris

February 26th, 2010
11:37 am

Mark……Our offense has enough players to keep us in any game we play. The problem wasn’t personnel it was INJURIES. What is the one thing you point out about Spiller??? He can change games “When he is healthy”! We’ve had enough draft picks the last two seasons sit on the sideline due to injury. I don’t think we can take another chance on a player who has questionable durability.
Falcons need a Defensive End who can pressure the QB and take pressure off our secondary. GO Defense

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
11:40 am

Even if he is not an every down back you still take him. Look at Bush he was the 2nd player taken in the draft, he’s not an every down but still a huge asset.

This Banks guy has Dunlap lasting till 29…he might be an idiot.

ClemsonDude

February 26th, 2010
11:41 am

Falcons should get Spiller!…..I watched Spiller in person the last 4 years at Clemson. He INDEED the greatest and FASTEST player in Clemson football history and one of the best in college football PERIOD. GO Tigers and GO CJ! Let me add that is also a VERY fine young man.

McDawg

February 26th, 2010
11:41 am

not 1st round but he is going to great pickup for the right team

should of had WAY WAY more heisman consideration

Willie Martinez

February 26th, 2010
11:45 am

Look guys……….If Spiller is still there then take him…..no onto more important things. What part of da A-Town is Freaknik gunna be in?

Ed in NC

February 26th, 2010
11:46 am

Either DL or DB if available at 19.

JDog

February 26th, 2010
11:52 am

He will be to some team as Reggie Bush is to the Saints

French Feller

February 26th, 2010
11:52 am

No. I was a spiller as a young feller and was punished a good bit for it by my dear Mother. Spillers are trouble. Stay away.

Tailback U

February 26th, 2010
12:00 pm

Mark
Any of these arguments persuading you one way or another ?
I could probably do it but I’m not the one getting paid here.
And besides I’d have to go into detail over draft philosophy
and we all know that arguments here are supposedly more
entertaining if they are based on emotion.

Mark Bradley

February 26th, 2010
12:01 pm

They’re helping, Tailback U.

Peion Deion

February 26th, 2010
12:04 pm

NO! Hello we need DEFENSE. Snelling did great filling in, Norwood just needs to step up & play. Draft a lineman or linebacker, but definately use the pick on D. We can score, we just cant stop anybody

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
12:05 pm

Last year we heard how Ray Rice wasn’t an every down back.
The year before the same things were said about Chris Johnson.

Someone seriously needs to remind me what “every-down back” means ’cause right now – I don’t want one.

Halsey

February 26th, 2010
12:08 pm

Maybe, but Spiller is a guy who supposedly always wants to bounce runs outside. Like Norwood, he likely won’t be a guy the Falcons could count on to run between the tackles. He’s not Chris Johnson. He brings a lot of things to the table, but the Falcons will always need to have a power runner to team with him.

Suspended Ref

February 26th, 2010
12:08 pm

Spiller is hurt most of the time,
just like Norwood,
the Falcons need not duplicate.

Nard34

February 26th, 2010
12:11 pm

The Falcons should go with either Spiller or Dwyer which ever one is availble because if you look @ our history of drafting defensive players lately it’s not as effective as drafting on offense exp. Offense: Ryan,Baker,White,Jenkins,Douglas,& Norwood. Defense: Jamal Anderson. My point is our best drafted players on defense have recently been drafted after the 1st round: Lofton,Bierman,Babbineaux,Davis,etc. You Can’t argue that at all……….

Bill Stanfill

February 26th, 2010
12:12 pm

This is all academic. Spiller will not be available at the 19th pick. He’ll be gone no later than the 15th pick.

5XSBC

February 26th, 2010
12:20 pm

NO! Trade with Cowboys so they can get him! LOL

................

February 26th, 2010
12:25 pm

Jonathan Dwyer is the best running back in the draft.

Ken Strickland

February 26th, 2010
12:30 pm

Teams coming off 9-7 seasons should expect to get a potential starter with their 1st rd pick. With as many holes as we have on DEF, you expect that potential starter to be a DEF player. You definitely don’t want to spend your 1st rd pick, especially if it’s your only pick in the 1st 2 rounds, on a backup RB, unless you feel he’s talented enough to replace the Probowl RB you already have.

When you factor in the problem our OC has had over the last 2yrs of effectively utilizing the dynamic, lightning fast RB JNorwood, why waste our 1st rd pick on RB Spiller, on the assumption he’ll do a better job of utilizing him than he did with Norwood? How does drafting a RBwith our 1st rd pick solve our pass rushing, CB and OLB, OL and WR issues, especially if there’s little chance he’ll replace our current Probowl RB?

While it’s an intriguing thought, it doesn’t make much sense at this point in the PROCESS.

Scott

February 26th, 2010
12:38 pm

Stick with the DEFENSE!!! The best DE, LB, or CB available — whoever they are. I’d love to have Spiller, but I don’t think that the Falcons can afford to use their #1 pick on him.

Coop

February 26th, 2010
12:38 pm

This is retarded. Drafting a backup RB with your 1st pick when you have questions at OLB, CB, DT, OT, OC, WR, and TE is simply retarded. This isn’t XBox, it’s a real football team that needs ot be built properly. We finally start to grow a decent team and some of you want to do an idiotic thing like draft CJ Spiller. Retarded. Hell, why not draft a backup QB who could be a great change of pace? Retarded!

Further, I’m not that impressed with the ACC backs. Spiller tearing up the Tech D doesn’t impress me after watching UGA rush for nearly 300 yards at about 8 yards a carry.

Retarded.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
12:39 pm

Ken: They won’t find a STARTER at #19. Haden will be gone, Dunlap will be gone….who out there is going to come in at CB or DE and start immediately?

Drafting Spiller DOESN’T answer our other problems…that’s why you have other picks and free agency.

We have a MUCH better chance of filling one of those defensive positions through FA than we do through the draft.

And I disagree 100% in that Spiller couldn’t be the guy that eventually replaces Turner.

Coop

February 26th, 2010
12:42 pm

Tommy P – Then trade back for more picks. Hell, draft Spoon (which I don’t like) at 19 and he starts at OLB.

RBs and WRs should be drafted NO EARLIER THAN round 3 unless it’s a Adrian Peterson, LT, Calvin Johnson type.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
12:43 pm

Falcons DE and Secondary 1st round draft picks NOT in the top 10 of the draft:

Clarence Ellis, Wilson Faumuina, Don Smith, Bobby Butler, Mike Pitts, Devin Bush, Michael Booker, Patrick Kerney.

O'Brien

February 26th, 2010
12:43 pm

Mark,

Norwood has a hard time staying healthy too. And 3 different coaching staffs have not figured out how to maximize his potential, it makes you wonder if it will ever happen.

For this season, the Falcons have Perry, Moore and Brian Williams coming back from injury, so thats 3 (defensive) players who they did not have for most of last year. So I would understand if they use the first pick on offense.

If Spiller is there, I think you take him. Norwood is not getting the job done, and I dont think he is as explosinve as Spiller. Plus our offense needs help. I was disappointed that we didnt score more points than we did last year.

Matt

February 26th, 2010
12:47 pm

Spiller can help the team immediately. The CB from Boise might help the team in 3 years. I don’t know why this is even being discussed. Unless they are going to sign Westbrook for the same role as what Spiller would do you can’t pass on him.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
12:53 pm

You don’t draft a Shelden Williams when a Brandon Roy is also available. (on 2nd thought, you don’t draft a Shelden Williams at all!)

Will

February 26th, 2010
12:58 pm

I am a Tech guy and I hated C.J. Spiller’s guts as the opposition at Clemson. He just killed us. The guy will be a game changer. The corners that the Falcons have began to “come on” toward the end of the season. I think that we can get through one more season with the defense that we’ve got plus a few defensive players that Dimitroff can get in rounds that are later than the 1st. If Spiller is available at 19th, the Falcons would be fools to pass him up.

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
1:02 pm

I just watched Spiller’s YT video. He runs by fast guys like they’re standing still. There is no way he will be available. Passing on him will be a lot teams gaff of the century. Norwood simply can’t be compared to Spiller.

So what have Spiller’s injuries been? Please let me know, just like AP lasted till the 7th pick injuries are the only thing that makes spiller fall in the draft (but not to 19).

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
1:04 pm

what Draft prognosticator has Spiller going the highest and how high?

Nard34

February 26th, 2010
1:04 pm

if reports are true about dwyer losing 17 pounds from being up to 235 pounds and reports of his 40 being around the mid 4.3 why would’nt we take dwyer he’s played in both pro-style under gailey and option which means he’s excellent @ blocking as well as far as a reciever when given the oppurtunitiy he always caught the ball i like cj but dwyer is a junior with more potential and way less injuries…….

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
1:05 pm

All I know is Spiller played with turf-toe for the entire year. And was incredible.

Tnfalcon

February 26th, 2010
1:05 pm

A Turner and Spiller combo would be awesome. Spiller is in the Chris Johnson mold. Would you pass on the chance to draft him? I think not.

Chas

February 26th, 2010
1:09 pm

Durability? He played in 51/52 possible games–that is 98%. He played with turf toe his ENTIRE Senior year.

Scored running the ball, catching the ball, throwing the ball, on a punt return and set the NCAA record for KR for touchdowns.

Against SEC competition he had 96 yard KR against Alabama, a 83 yard run against Auburn, an 88 yard KR against South Carolina and 172 all purpose yards and MVP against Kentucky in the bowl game.

He had over 300 all-purpose yards against both Fla State and Miami this year. He rushed for 233 yards against Ga Tech on 20 carries and was voted MVP in a losing effort in the ACC Championship game.

Has the second most all purpose yards in College Football history.

He is a once every 25 years type player.

Heck yeah you take him.

Tnfalcon

February 26th, 2010
1:10 pm

I agree with Ted M. The falcons will never see Spiller. Either Seattle or San Fran will take him. He will be gone by pick #16.

Outside Observer

February 26th, 2010
1:14 pm

The goal is to win the Super Bowl. Right now, our biggest threats to get there are the Saints and the Cowboys. The Saints have a dominant offense led by Drew Brees with many options to throw to. I saw a comment one time that worries me. “What happens when Mike Peterson is matched up with Reggie Bush…” Umm, we are basically screwed when that happens. I think based on the talent that will be available, I say we draft the best true outside linebacker for a 4-3 defense in this class, Sean Weatherspoon. Think of the value, the best player at his position with the 19th pick. Plus, his NFL career will last much longer than Spiller’s. Spiller took an extra year of hits by staying for his senior year. I understand Spiller’s explosive ability (I watched it live twice this year). But I think we need to make the safe pick that will make this team stronger for years to come.

Stephen

February 26th, 2010
1:14 pm

Sign Peppers (opposite JA would make QBs cry), draft Spiller, then address secondary in later rounds.

Nard34

February 26th, 2010
1:14 pm

if Dwyer goes to the Chargers with Rivers that could mean trouble to opposing NFL Teams with the Colts on the Decline that would be major. Just think the Falcons have a history of passing on local talent shall i remind people of when we did not attempt to trade down and grab Calvin and went along with the crazed SEC falcon fans who said jamal anderson would become a beast how did that turn-out for The Birds……..

R.U.KIDDEN-ME???

February 26th, 2010
1:16 pm

MARK,LET’S PLAY “WHAT IF?” WHAT IF SSAYYYYYYY…..ROLANDO MCCLAIN IS STILL THERE WHADYADO THEN??!!!

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
1:27 pm

Colts are on the decline? That’s news to me.

teamguy

February 26th, 2010
1:28 pm

Well done, Chas!! Probable ROY, possible MVP! He’ll change games without even touching the ball, as punters try to kick away from him. Plus, he’ll make that offense even better with his ability to run, catch, and throw!

Hollywould

February 26th, 2010
1:29 pm

Mark, I was over on clairmont rd. at lunch and saw a RV with Kyle Wilson all over it. Painted with his pics/Boise st. insignias/and a web site. Check out http://www.boisestate.scout.com. I wonder why it is parked in a parking lot.

Chas

February 26th, 2010
1:30 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pAJh_eJ7yo

Watch this video and then tell me you are not going to take him.

Coop

February 26th, 2010
1:32 pm

R E T A R D E D ! !

Not taking him.

blord

February 26th, 2010
1:33 pm

This is per profootballtalk.com

Mike Smith: Adding to running back position not a priority
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on February 26, 2010 12:03 PM ET

“A few media folks have wondered about a possible reunion of LaDainian Tomlinson and Michael Turner in Atlanta, but Falcons coach Mike Smith seemed to downplay the idea Friday.

While he noted the team always wants to improve it’s depth at running back, he spoke glowingly of Michael Turner and especially his backup Jason Snelling.

He also said that he likes the matchup problems that Jerious Norwood provides and said that running back wasn’t one of the team’s top priorities going into the offseason.

So you can basically scratch another team off the Tomlinson wish list.”

Looks like Spiller may not be on the list of things Mike Smith is looking for

Bigstack O' Pancakes. It is an Irish name.

February 26th, 2010
1:34 pm

That is a tough one. I say pass and draft a corner, LB, or O-Lineman. Spiller reminds me of a poor man’s Reggie Bush and Reggie Bush isn’t that great. I am glad I won’t be making this decision.

waw

February 26th, 2010
1:37 pm

On offense, the Falcons are farther ahead on weapons than they are on support. No on Spiller. Yes on O-line.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
1:38 pm

Smith isn’t going to talk poorly about Snelling and Norwood. He’s also not going to say how they want Spiller so teams can trade up to take him before we do.

That article told me we don’t want LT. And with good reason.

falcon4life

February 26th, 2010
1:43 pm

I mentioned this a couple of days ago on your CB blog. Yes. CJ or some other #2 back is desperately needed. The D has enough young talent sprinkled in to improve. Plus with Peria Jerry and Michael Moore returning you are adding 2 starters to the defense right there. Norwood is not near as explosive as he was and Snelling is good but really best as a bcakup. We need someone that can carry the load if Turner is down. The alternative will set the Offense back and that is the key to this team taking the next level.

Nard34

February 26th, 2010
1:57 pm

CJ will be well gone before 19th. But I keep saying Dwyer is the best overall pure running back in the draft maybe the last 5-6 years and C.J. is the best overall all-purpose player too come out maybe the last 15-20 years…………. Which ever team gets either one will make a dramatic change instently every year falcon fans wants to draft defense and @ the end of the year complain about Offense not putting up enough points!

Nard34

February 26th, 2010
2:03 pm

why waste Ryan talent by not surrounding him with the best talent that is availble. The unwritten rule when drafting in any sport is to take the best talent availble. so if CJ is there draft him, if dwyer is there draft him, if thomas is there draft him it’s not that difficult get rid of Norwood he is a waste part ways with Jenkins sadly a 1st round bust and move-on.

Nard34

February 26th, 2010
2:07 pm

DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER DWYER!!!! JUS WATCH THE COMBINE…………..

IceFan

February 26th, 2010
2:10 pm

Sonny Clusters,

I’m certain they would appreciate the personal invite to DQ. I see a possible dual endorsement deal in both of your futures.

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
2:20 pm

Sonny Clusters needs a thought of the day type thing on here.

The guy simply spews wisdom. :)

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
2:27 pm

Dryer just weighed in at the combine at 229 and 5′11″ wow after losing 17 lbs

Ted M

February 26th, 2010
2:29 pm

spiller 5′11″ and 196 lbs

jarvis

February 26th, 2010
2:35 pm

Willy

February 26th, 2010
2:41 pm

Norwood is probably through. If he plays next year, it would almost certainly be his last; especially with the concussions and all. Let Dimitroff find those special defensive players he’s so good at finding, and have an absolutely phenomenal offense with the addition of a guy like Spiller. I’m for it.

Tron5000

February 26th, 2010
2:48 pm

Rotoworld reports that last year’s #19 pick, Jeremy Maclin, has a contract of 5yrs/$15.5 mil. Is CJ Spiller worth $3 mil a year? It’s hard to see how he’s not. Hmm. Never really entertained the idea, but for that kind of money…

TommyP

February 26th, 2010
2:58 pm

Glad we got so much give and take on the topic with Bradley. :)

?????

Harry the Hat

February 26th, 2010
3:02 pm

Yes on Spiller, but he’ll want a billion dolllars. Not worth that much!

PMC

February 26th, 2010
3:11 pm

I think there are more pressing needs but I’m also the guy that wanted Glenn Dorsey a couple years ago too. I think he’s probably gone, I’d love to be able to trade that pick and get into the second round as well. I definately wouldn’t mind having Spiller though I’m just concerned like Norwood that he’s not going to break tackles well on the NFL level. There are only maybe 3 guys in the league capable of running away from other NFL players like Spiller did in college.

I’m definately not going to cry if they add another weapon. Imagine going 3 wide with Harry Douglass in the slot, Spiller in the backfield, Tony G at TE, Roddy White and Jenkins wide. That’s all kinds of pressure on the defense in space.

Tron5000

February 26th, 2010
3:14 pm

Move up to get Derrick Morgan, or sign Karlos Dansby and go after Spiller at 19 and DE later.

ASHEVILLE DAWG

February 26th, 2010
3:16 pm

Spillers is the Percy Harvin of this draft. Spillars could return kicks and would give tuner a break. I think he is a sure thing for helping us this year. Being like Percy would not be a negative.

justin

February 26th, 2010
3:35 pm

im thinkin this would be a great oppotunity for us to take advantage of the amount of defensive talent in this draft. I know every draft has some big names but when looking up and down this board it looks like the first three rounds could have alot of potential game changers ( especially on the defensive side of the ball which we really need.) I really like the idea of seeing spiller in a falcons uniform but we really need help with our pass defense. We already have a decent change of pace with norwood and there are some old but quality FA’s out there as well. So I say lets go after a kyle wilson, brandon graham or even sergio kindle. Lets not forget we went 9 and 7 with our defense as awful as it was at times so we could be a smart draft away from unlocking a serious playoff here.

TheAntiMe

February 26th, 2010
3:40 pm

With the top 2 draft picks from last year (Peria Jerry and William Moore) hopefully coming back from season-long injuries, it will be pretty much as if the Falcons had an extra 1st and 2nd round pick on the defensive side of the ball.

That being the case, I would say that unless there is some highly-rated player still availible on defense when the Birds pick, I believe that you surely have to pick C.J. Spiller if he is still available.

I have my doubts, however, as to whether Spiller would still be on the board when the 19th pick rolls around.

He isn't playing gatech in the pros

February 26th, 2010
5:18 pm

No way should the falcons pick Spiller. Ofcouse he looked good if you watched his games against Georgia Tech and Florida State, who happened to be two of the worst defensive teams in a weak ACC. How bout his game against the mighty Gamecocks? Yes he did have the kickoff for a TD at the beginning, but then what did he do? 18 rushing yards and 19 receiving yards, but supposively he was injured or sick or maybe both, right Clemson fans? Bottom line if the Falcons do decide to take a RB in the 1st round they should the future Michael Turner aka Jon Dwyer and not CJ Spiller.

Ken Strickland

February 26th, 2010
5:21 pm

TOMMYP-you have got to be kidding.

2ND RD PICKS: MLB CLOFTON, ROG JBLALOCK, DT JBABINEAUX

3RD RD PICKS: CB COWENS, SS TDECOUD, OLB CWIRE

4TH RD PICKS: OLG SNICHOLAS, CB BWILLIAMS

5TH RD PICKS: RB MTURNER, DE KBIERMANN

6TH RD PICKS: DT TLEWIS

7TH RD PICKS: DT VWALKER

UFA(Undrafted free agents)OT TCLABO, OG HDAHL, CB BGRIMES, WR BFINNERAN

HOW CAN YOU MAKE SUCH AN IRRISPONSIBILE STATEMENT LIKE THAT WHEN OUR MAJORITY OF OUR STARTING OFF/DEF IS COMPRISED OF PLAYERS WHO WERE EITHER DRAFTED BELOW THE 1ST RD, OR SIGNED AS UFA’s?

SOME OF YOU SEEM TO THINK THIS IS FANTASY FOOTBALL. WE DON’T NEED ANOTHER RB BAD ENOUGH TO WASTE OUR ONLY PICK IN THE 1ST 2RDS ON ONE.

bg

February 26th, 2010
5:50 pm

Really?

February 26th, 2010
5:56 pm

He isn’t playing gatech in the pros:

As long as you are cherry-picking stats, your hero Dwyer rushed for 49 yards against Iowa (and looked really bad doing it) and a whopping SEVEN yards against Miami. (As long as you’re keeping track, Spiller had about 300 total yards against Miami.)

Apparently, really good players can have bad games. Spiller’s bad games just happen to include scoring touchdowns, which he did in every game this season. Perhaps you should look at a player’s entire body of work like every NFL GM will do. That, of course, is why Spiller is well ahead of Dwyer (and every other RB) on the draft board.

Idiot.

michigan dirty bird

February 26th, 2010
6:08 pm

i would have no problem with cj cause i feel we need more playmakers and home run threats for matty and to spell the burner, but i think he’ll be gone and we should take taylor mays. decoud had a good year and we have moore i realize but mays is a freak

oldfart

February 26th, 2010
7:54 pm

He won’t be there, but if by some miracle that he is you have to take him. Then trade Norwood for a defender.

gman

February 26th, 2010
8:29 pm

D Sproles will be out there. If we need another fast RB at least look at one that’s proven he can make some noise in the NFL.

Michael

February 26th, 2010
8:48 pm

Yes I think we should draft him. The Falcons are a playoff caliber team. Last year they were thrown off course by the injury bug while playing a brutal schedule. Remember, the top two picks from last years draft saw limited action due to injury. Staring CB Brian Williams was lost for the season via injury against the Bears. After beating the bears this team was 4-1. It is my opinion that the Falcons should go into this draft looking for the best players on both sides of the ball. Depth is the way to go in this draft. Imagine what would have happened last season if Spiller had been a Falcon when Norwood and Turner were sidelined by injuries. You cannot pass up an impact player like this. He is a game changer and will make his team better on both sides of the ball.

Michael

February 26th, 2010
8:57 pm

A Couple more points. If the Falcons do not select a defensive player with the first pick it’s going to be OK. The success of the 2010 season is not dependent on the drafting a defensive player with their first pick.

Big Ray

February 26th, 2010
9:37 pm

Hmmmm….here’s a thought. If Spiller is available at #19, there are a couple of things that may have happened. Either his stock has fallen, or a lot of good defensive players have been taken (along with O-linemen).

If it’s the former, then Dimitroff and Smith need to know why Spiller’s stock has fallen.

If it’s the latter, drafting Spiller has more merit, as any defender left at this point may be a reach at #19.

Not an answer, just a thought…

waynester

February 26th, 2010
11:25 pm

Big Ray
your thought provoked this one: if Spiller is on the board at 19, we immediately phone San Diego and offer to trade our pick for their picks #60 and #91 plus a 2nd in 2011. They get CJ before the Texans race to the podium right behind us with Spiller’s name on their card. We get awesome value in the talent-rich 2nd-3rd.

Maxx

February 27th, 2010
6:45 am

I just think that we have needs other than at RB. Turner and Snelling will be a solid combo, but assuming we let go of Norwood, we do need a speed back, which I believe we can find later in the draft. I think we draft the best Defensive player available, hopefully Sean Witherspoon

TommyP

February 27th, 2010
10:18 am

Old blog but still a hot topic. I sure hope Ken Strickland reads this.

Ken: Are/were you on drugs when you posted your last response? What the hell were you talking about? You MADE MY POINT while thinking you were disagreeing with me.

We can find defensive help later in the draft, bozo. You’re NOT drafting a defensive starter at pick #19!!!!!!

Your post MADE MY POINT. What an idiot.

Chi Chi

February 27th, 2010
2:03 pm

NOOOOOOOOOOO we could get a guy like Trendon Holiday from LSU later in the draft and hes just as much of a game changer as Spiller.

Nesbitt for Heisman!

February 27th, 2010
5:31 pm

I’d rather have Dwyer. I know he is a similar style runner to Michael Turner, but he is more explosive. Dwyer and Turner could split the workload and both stay fresh all season long. We could run all day with that RB combo, and it would take pressure off of Matt Ryan and open up the passing game. Dwyer’s team was 4-0 against Spiller’s team while he was at Tech.

Observant

February 27th, 2010
6:01 pm

Spiller played with turf toe all year….yet was UNANIMOUS All American.

If the Falcons, or someone up the line even, DON’T take him, they need to take a new GM then.

He is a pontential game changer every time he touches the ball.

Jon Dwyer??? Compared to Spiller??? Best Dwyer can hope for is to gain 25 pounds and play as a fullback, or that pro speed will eat him up before he hits the line.

RSX

February 28th, 2010
12:23 am

I’m in favor of McCluster in Rd. 3, DEF Rd. 1

kshizzle

February 28th, 2010
2:11 am

Spiller is a special teams player in the NFL, albeit a great one like Hester, Metcaff and others. Do I draft him because I want/need a running back???? Heck no. Dwyer is the best NFL running back in the draft.

Rufus

February 28th, 2010
9:07 am

No! They need O and D linemen! The best back in the world can’t run without blocking.

Louie

February 28th, 2010
9:14 am

Mr. D

February 28th, 2010
9:20 am

Yes,i’m sold on him – Turner’s not always healthy and neither is Norwood. The team sufferd last year when one of them was out of action. Getting Spiller won’t be that easy though the Falcons would probally have to trade up and i say yes, yes, yes.

jamie cunningham

February 28th, 2010
9:52 am

i’d like to get spiller, but only after we have secured a plan for d.e./c.b. what about robert mathis? he lives in atlanta. him, abraham, jerry… thats a beast of a d’line! dunta robinson for c.b.? that’s exacttly what we need…

all due respect to norwood, but he’s done everything he’s gonna do here in atl, and douglas is easily the best return guy we’ll have next year. i’m not worried about our offense, they’ll be fine. the biggest problem with the offense last year was… matty ‘melted’ ice! he took forever to go through his progressions and was late most of the time with the ball. it was the ’sophomore slump’. i think he’ll be much better this year though and our offense will be as advertised for last year. what we do need is pressure on the opposing q/b and our defense will take a huge leap forward.

jamie cunningham

February 28th, 2010
9:56 am

and “rufus”, i know what you’re saying about the “best back in the world not being able to run without blocking”. but what did snelling do in the last few games last year? he’s a mid-level runner at best in the league and he was tearing it up late last year. i think our o-line is pretty solid. doesn’t mean we don’t need to plan for the future though. the right side of the line is getting a little older…

YELLOWFUZZ

February 28th, 2010
10:10 am

who cares who they take the Falcons suck

YELLOWFUZZ

February 28th, 2010
10:11 am

Jackets suck too

YELLOWFUZZ

February 28th, 2010
10:12 am

I love Paul’s Johnson

S

February 28th, 2010
11:12 am

DePlane

February 28th, 2010
11:46 am

I still like going w/defense first. But if we can’t get a Graham, Spoon or maybe Kindle and Spiller drops to us you have to take him. He is supremely talented and lightning fast and the type of playmaker the Falcons could use on offense in so many ways….and apparently the character type of guy they look for.
I wouldn’t be disappointed that’s for sure.

Moe4

February 28th, 2010
12:11 pm

Spiller would be a mistake in the first round. I saw him run a kick off back against Carolina but also 9/18 in rushing. He cannot be a running back in the NFL. The first poster who said Dexter McCluster with a later pick was absolutely right. He will probably be better in the pros.

Wreckmaniac

February 28th, 2010
12:12 pm

Spiller is the #1 RB/kickoff return/punt return player in this year’s draft. He will go well before 19. If the Falcons want him they will have to trade up as mentioned by others. He will be chosen before # 13.

Wreckmaniac

February 28th, 2010
12:15 pm

I also agree that Dwyer is the more atypical NFL running back due to size. He runs well inside as Spiller is typically more effective outside. But Spiller is more versatile.

Duh?!

February 28th, 2010
1:07 pm

No! the Falcons should package their pick with Matt Ryan and get Michael Vick back here! Thats a no brainer! DUH!

Georgia Red

February 28th, 2010
1:17 pm

I saw him get shut down against good defenses and don’t see him as a first round guy.

cornell

February 28th, 2010
1:41 pm

i think we should thats who i want in the first round if he is available. he can contribute more than just by running the ball. He can also return kicks and that will help in field position. he gives us that big play guy that we do not have on either side of the ball.

quint

February 28th, 2010
3:16 pm

No. Don’t waste time on a running back unless he has a strong resemblance to Adrian Peterson. I still think Kyle Wilson would be great at cornerback, if he is there at 19.

GSU Eagle 91

February 28th, 2010
3:27 pm

Mark..The Falcons HAVE to take CJ if he is available..A mediocre Clemson squad was so much better with him on the field, and we need more playmakers on offense.
I feel the Defense stayed on the field too much last season, and our offense was stagnant at times.
Take him, TD!

74Dawg

February 28th, 2010
3:55 pm

Mark, is it possible Dexter McCluster will drop to the third round? I see a similar skill set there.

MontinoD

February 28th, 2010
4:26 pm

Spiller ran a 4.27 at the combine. That’s the type of change-of-pace back the Falcons need, especially if Norwood isn’t resigned. Besides, fast running backs are immediate impact players while you may have to wait years to see what you have at other positions.

The Chief

February 28th, 2010
4:35 pm

Well, his senior season included two losses to Geogia Tech and a loss to South Carolina. That’s a game changer?

Bruce Wayne

February 28th, 2010
6:09 pm

I hear some great agruments. I feel like as for as sports goes its hard to every really live down a bad draft decesion. Let me ask you if Reggie Bush had done great things no matter how good Mario would have been unless he was deacon jones the texans would have always be seen as a team that dropped the ball. Like the Pistons for passing on Carmelo and Dwayne Wade. Or the Trailblazers passing on Durant, Or the the team that passed on Jordan. You can’t pass up the chance at a special player for a decent corner cause we know that by that there will be no shut down corners at that pick. So u could get one in the second round or free agency.

bill h

February 28th, 2010
6:49 pm

Take Spiller with the first pick. Antrelle Rolle announced today that he will test the free agent market so the Falcons should try and sign Rolle so they wouldn’t have to take a DB with the first pick. Then pick a DE or OLB with the second pick, but if Arthur Blank really wants to win, sign Julius Peppers too.

C

February 28th, 2010
8:29 pm

NNNOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!

SPILLER DESERVES TO BE ON A REAL NFL TEAM

C

February 28th, 2010
8:38 pm

THE CHIEF: Spiller scored in every game he played in last season, that is the definition of a game changer – you techtard

SpillerFan

February 28th, 2010
8:45 pm

Being a Clemson fan and watching Spiller play this past year was amazing. While Clemson didn’t have a championship type season, Spiller did everything he could to win. He scored 4 touchdowns against Tech in the ACC Championship. He’s also a huge threat on punt and kick-off returns and took many back to the house. I’d love to see him in Atlanta, because I didn’t see another player that could be such a game changer, and thrilling to watch at the same time. Every time he gets the ball, the threat is there for him to take it all the way. Go Spiller!

Left and Right

February 28th, 2010
8:56 pm

Falcons better be getting some offensive linemen. There is a reason our offense was
not as good and it starts with the O-line.

Big Dog

February 28th, 2010
9:05 pm

Let’s see…..Spiller doesn’t qualify because his TEAM lost to Ga. Tech. Well that’s telling me that Stafford wasn’t as good at QB than, say, Nesbitt??

It’s that fuzzy, sliderule logic that Technerds throw out.

And Dwyer is the best RB in the draft?? Tell that to the legion GM’s that miss that factoid as they pass him up for the lesser backs (Including C.J. Spiller)……YOU MYOPIC TECHNERD!!!

FalconJim

February 28th, 2010
9:19 pm

If a guy like Spiller falls in our lap, we almost have to take him. The only worry for me is that we’ve drafted a couple of guys lately that were injury prone in college, and picked right up where they left off, after they were drafted into the Pros. I’m a little “gun-shy” now.
But if you think about it, if Turner were to go down again, who are left with – Snelling and Norwood basically, and a versatile running back like Spiller would be a very valuable asset!!! Heck, I’d rather have Spiller over Norwood, ANYDAY!!!
We DO need a proven pass rusher too, and I think we might be able to find that in free-agency. Then hope for Weatherspoon at OLB.

Hamad Meander

February 28th, 2010
10:21 pm

As much as the defense needs some pieces, let me make one thing clear – Spiller runs a 4.28 40 yard dash and is the fastest, most explosive player in the draft. The Falcons, and truly every other NFL team can use a guy like Spiller. I’d say take him and worry about the defense with free agency and the later rounds.

Just think of the Falcons with Spiller running back kicks, running reverses, lining up at receiver, running back on third down…..I can’t imagine the Falcons not scoring 32 points a game.

Richard

February 28th, 2010
10:54 pm

MB, If Spiller is actually available at 22, there are some GM’s that should be fired instantly. The real question is if the Falcons should trade up to get him.

CitizenK9

February 28th, 2010
11:01 pm

I think he’s a good guy but played in the ACC against soft defenses. Remember what UGA’s backs did to GT ? Add injury problems to that. The Falcons have to think foundation not flash.

SEC_Champion

February 28th, 2010
11:36 pm

uh he won’t even almost be available. His 4.27 40yard dash time made sure of that. He’s a top 10 pick with that speed. A the teams in the top 10 spots of the draft are thinking ” the next Chris Johnson”

Andrew

March 1st, 2010
12:27 am

Spiller would be a nice addition to the team but i think right now another RB isnt top priority. Though could be used on special teams also how about a WR who can do that to? I’ve been watching the combine and Golden Tate WR from Notre Dame is really jumping out. They are listing him as a late 1st early 2nd rounder but after seeing his 40 time today ( 4.42 ) I think he has really improved his stock. Not only was he a great WR this season but he was also quite flashy on special teams to. He reminds me alot of Percy Harvin. One of his biggest things i was also impressed with was his after catch yardage. Im not saying 100% go with Golden Tate, though the name is quite flashy, but some type of WR that has the special teams spark in him also.

Outside Observer

March 1st, 2010
12:33 am

Comparisons abound of Spiller being the next Reggie Bush. My question is this, was Reggie Bush more instrumental to the Saints success than Jonathon Vilma? I think the answer to that question determines who the draft pick should be. I know my answer…

willieg hates bill shanks

March 1st, 2010
2:10 am

look it is simple see who the falcons pick up in free agency starting marth 5th and come april 22nd in PRIME TIME WATCH THE BOARD THE FALCONS NEED TO TRADE DOWN, and get the MONSTER from nebraska , if tampa bay gets him the falcons will be in deep trouble seeing him twice a year.

[...] asked for your help. Fifty-five percent of more than 2,000 respondents in a quickie poll suggested the Falcons should pass on the fleet Clemson back “only if they’re nuts.” (The Falcons, it should be stipulated, have done nutty things in past drafts, but they’ve [...]

savannah falcon

March 1st, 2010
1:22 pm

Here we go again. The AJC always finds something negative to say about top prospect.