Bradley’s Buzz: ESPN’s Buster doesn’t love Braves’ rotation

This, you should note, is not a recent picture. (AJC photo by Curtis Compton)

This, as you doubtless know, is not a recent picture. (AJC photo by Curtis Compton)

We keep hearing that the Braves’ rotation will be just as good without the man who finished fourth in the National League Cy Young voting  in 2009. The (thin) reasoning: That Javier Vazquez was unlikely to have such a season again, but that Tim Hudson — who underwent Tommy John surgery in 2008 and who has won two games since — will absolutely return to top-of-the-rotation form. This, I say again, assumes a lot.

I haven’t quite bought it, and I note for your edification that the estimable Buster Olney of ESPN.com hasn’t yet, either. Writing for ESPN’s Insiders, Buster O. lists his top five rotations — top six, actually — and somehow doesn’t include the Braves’. (Link requires registration.) His rankings:

  • 1. Red Sox: Josh Beckett, Jon Lester, John Lackey, Daisuke Matsuzaka, Clay Buchholz, Tim Wakefield.
  • 2. Yankees: CC Sabathia, A.J. Burnett, Andy Pettitte, Javier Vazquez, Phil Hughes.
  • 3.  White Sox: Jake Peavy, Mark Buehrle, John Danks, Gavin Floyd, Freddy Garcia.
  • 4. Angels: Jered Weaver, Scott Kazmir, Joe Saunders, Ervin Santana, Joel Pineiro.
  • 5. Cardinals: Chris Carpenter, Adam Wainwright, Kyle Lohse, Brad Penny and “somebody else.”
  • 5a. Phillies: Roy Halladay, Cole Hamels, Joe Blanton, J.A. Happ, Jamie Moyer.

Of the latter, Olney writes: “The Phillies would have been No. 1 if they had Halladay, [Cliff] Lee and Hamels 1-2-3.” And what of the Braves? Here goes:

“I probably would have placed [them] at No. 3 if not for the trade of Javier Vazquez.”

So I guess that makes two among us who haven’t quite grasped the offseason Zen of Wren — Buster O. and yours truly. But you are, as ever, free to tell me how obstinately obtuse I am.

341 comments Add your comment

aswingruber

February 9th, 2010
11:37 am

aswingruber

February 9th, 2010
11:38 am

I’ve waited so long for that honor. Life is now complete… I agree, too many question marks with the rotation and lineup going into the season.

Brandon from Warner Robins

February 9th, 2010
11:39 am

Good Morning, Mark.

Still a solid rotation. If D-Lowe and Huddy can rebound, JJ and Tommy continue improving this rotation has the potential to be really good.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
11:39 am

Kudos to aswingruber. Your wait is at an end.

Clint

February 9th, 2010
11:40 am

yeah, it’s not like Hudson was lights out before the surgery. He has pretty much been a disappointment in Atlanta. And trading a guy because he might have a worse year than the year he just , is the most retarded logic I’ve heard to try to justify that trade.

Reid Adair

February 9th, 2010
11:41 am

Come on, Mark. You’re not really surprised by this, are you? You’ve been saying this – and many of your readers have as well.

Everyone wanted to praise Frank Wren for the 2009 rotation he put together. What they didn’t realize – at least not at first – was that it would not be possible for that rotation to remain intact for 2010. Now, Javier Vazquez is gone. Wren traded away an Opening Day starter and failed to get as much as an everyday position player in return.

dap01

February 9th, 2010
11:42 am

I love Hudson but I am still waiting to the Hudson that we heard about while he was in Oakland.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
11:43 am

I’m not surprised, Reid. But I’m still not sure why that rotation couldn’t hold together for one more year. Was $11.5 million really the tipping point?

MtnDawg

February 9th, 2010
11:43 am

Getting ride of Vasquez was a bone-head move.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
11:44 am

Clint and dap01, I’m with you. I think — actually, I know — I wrote last week that sometimes the Hudson we saw here was so ordinary that I wondered if something was wrong with his arm. He kept saying there wasn’t, but now it seems there was.

Reality Check

February 9th, 2010
11:45 am

Mark, I said it yesterday and you are right. We traded a reliable starter who is durable and was one of the top three pitchers in NL or right up there for an aging pitcher coming off major surgery. Hudson may come back to form but what happens after ten to fifteen starts. This is a big gamble that even if it works the Braves will be no better off. There was no reason to gamble if we were not going to use the money to sign real proven everyday outfielder or first baseman.

CTrim

February 9th, 2010
11:45 am

Enter your comments here

Lowcountry Bulldawg

February 9th, 2010
11:51 am

Olney is correct, but the rotation only has to be so good. The Braves aren’t in the AL as 4 of these teams are and really does the White Sox or Angels rotation scare you? Peavy has questions as well coming off an injury plagued season. A rotation of JJ,Hanson, Hudson, Lowe and KK in the National League is pretty impressive.

TXDawg

February 9th, 2010
11:52 am

Guess we’ll pull another rabbit out the hat, or should I say another Tommy Hanson out of the minors this year. Ratings are sometimes overrated.

shmoe

February 9th, 2010
11:54 am

Once again, Buster Busted Picks Olney will eat crow. I don’t see how he could place the Angels rotation above the Braves. Either put the Braves on that list, or take the Angels off as well. Joe Saunders and Joel Pineiro? Really? And Kazmir is great, except his arm is always falling off. I agree with the other staffs on the list, they are all very good, to great, may even be phenomenal. Next year, they will be putting Braves on that list. Hanson and JJ is as nasty a 1-2 as there is in the game. Hudson, Lowe and KK will round it out very nicely. It would be nice to have Vazquez still and Lowe as 5th starter, but then that would make the Braves top 3 on that list for sure.

Actually, I disagree with the White Sox ranking. It is pure rubbish. Peavy is a disaster waiting to happen, and Freddy Garcia has been pure rubbish for quite some time now.

Bravedawg

February 9th, 2010
11:54 am

Who cares! Let’s see them pitch and then decide. You reporters must be bored out of your mind right now to come up with this garbage. Go BRAVES!!!!!!

Sonny Clusters

February 9th, 2010
11:54 am

When a baseball player’s arm gets stringy and limp and won’t lift up right when he is winding up and won’t snap back after the throw, that player’s arm is suffering from bobbycoxia of the arm. We was always wondering how many pitchers was ruined by this bobbycoxia virus. We can think of quite a few.

glorydays

February 9th, 2010
11:56 am

I would like to hear from those who were so PO’ed that Vazquez was brought in for Flowers etc last year. If the young arms brought in work out down the road then it was a good trade. If Vazquez crashes and burns this year (he’s done it before) then it was a good trade. Who really knows?

shmoe

February 9th, 2010
11:57 am

Phillies rotation may deserve to be #3 on that list. And Braves #4 or #5. No way the White sox or Angels rotations are definitively better than Atlanta, even without Javy.

PMC

February 9th, 2010
11:59 am

You are correct. It is a huge gamble. But…. blame it on ownership and Lowe. Derrick Lowe and poor worth relative to his contract are the reason they couldn’t trade him. Same with Kawikami.

A caring ownership would have retained Vasquez contract and found a Left Fielder and First Baseman.

The move was made primarily as a cost saver for the bottom line, you know it. I know it. Frank Wren knows it. They had to move someone and Vasquez was the only one with real value so they got what they could and publically they will pretend much like that they did not weaken the product.

really?

February 9th, 2010
12:00 pm

“The Phillies would have been No. 1 if they had Halladay, [Cliff] Lee and Hamels 1-2-3.”

ya think???

shmoe

February 9th, 2010
12:00 pm

Sonny Clusters,

You must have bobbycoxia below the belt or in the brain then. Bobbo’s pitchers are certainly not the only ones to suffer arm problems. But I’d venture to guess this comment falls on deaf ears.

KnightInATL

February 9th, 2010
12:01 pm

It would have made no sense to keep Vazquez. He would be in a contract year this year, and as any knowledgeable fan knows, we would not have been able to keep him around with an extension. Our choices would have been to trade him before the season (and get the max we could for him…though I’m not sure that Melky Cabrera was the answer) or keep him around and trade him at the deadline (and get less). Long term, it makes more sense to extend Hudson and get what you can for Vazquez. And let’s not forget, Vazquez had essentially a career year last season that he is highly unlikely to duplicate.

Jeff Walker

February 9th, 2010
12:02 pm

So, Roy Hallady makes up for an absolutely awful Jamie Moyer and a slumping cole hamels? Not to mention that the guy they claim to be so consistent (Blanton) had a worse ERA than Kawakami. Hanson and Jurrjens are a 1-2 that is equal to the Angels, Chi Sox and Boston. Besides, didn’t the Braves #5 starter, Kawakami, go toe-to-toe w/ the great Roy Halladay last year and win? I think so. I wasn’t aware that there were 6 other teams that could slide a sub-4.00 ERA into the #5 spot. Buster is wrong and so is Mark (no shocker there)

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:02 pm

Ratings are sometimes overrated, TXDawg. And I’ll steal that line before long.

PMC

February 9th, 2010
12:02 pm

He’s smoking serious crack with the 5A selection though. That’s freaking ridiculous. Cole Hamels should be awesome, but we don’t know where he is mentally. Blanton and Happ are average. Jamie Moyer is 400 years old.

aswingruber

February 9th, 2010
12:04 pm

I wasn’t crazy about the trade either. With that said, it seems that people seem to forget that we got the Yankees best pitching prospect, Arodys Vizcaino, in the deal who every scout claims has a high ceiling. It’s likely that this guy could turn into another top of the rotation starter like Jair down the line while Vasquez is almost guaranteed to decline from last season’s form as he shifts to the AL and gets older. Then how does this trade look? It’s easy to lose sight of the long term and get caught up in the instant gratification of these deals but it takes time to get a true read of which side got the better deal. Refer to the Texeira trade.

extremus

February 9th, 2010
12:06 pm

While Hudson has been a consistently good pitcher throughout his career, he can be injury prone and, while he may still yet have another really good season or two left in his arm, I don’t think he can be depended on as a top-of-the-rotation starter. I definitely hold out hope that he will pitch lights-out this year and be one of the league’s feel-good stories, but truthfully if that happens it’s because the Braves were very fortunate, not because of sound decision-making of the part of Frank Wren. The cost cutting and personnel moves have been annual gambles by him and Liberty Media that things will hold together just enough to remain competitive and profitable; the atmosphere of winning it all being the standard goal has evaporated.

A lie that we and other smaller markets have come to be deceived by is that we can build a perennial contender out of our farm system. “Let this or that established player go in exchange for a promising young prospect”; sound familiar? Fifteen or twenty years ago, that was absolutely true and the Braves were the model example of it by such acquisitions as John Smoltz for Doyle Alexander and bringing up a slew of great talent, many now headed for Cooperstown. But the current nature of the game and the runaway costs of free agency have turned the tables to where now, the smaller markets themselves (in fact, let’s face it, all but about three or four markets in the league) have become the farm systems for richer teams like the Yankees to come in at will during free agency and reap the benefits that the other teams have taken years to develop and mature. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if say, seven or eight years from now we see Vizcaino, the prospect we got in exchange for Vazquez, donning a Yankees uniform, along with other current Braves prospects.

We need to get past the “that’s the way it is” mentality throughout baseball and do whatever it takes to restore competitive balance in free agency (even if it means restricting PLAYER SALARIES; don’t dare call that communist or oppressive when those guys say they feel entitled to seven figures or more per year and a tenth of our country are currently out of work and most of the rest struggle just to make ends meet…don’t, because if this economy hasn’t hit you yet it very likely will soon). If things don’t change, while it won’t happen overnight, eventually it will mean the extinction of many smaller market franchises and possibly even MLB itself. NOTHING, including sports and entertainment, are recession-proof, folks.

Chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:06 pm

Bradley quit your whining…we made a shrewd decision to extend a pitcher who has better career #s at a cheaper price than take our chances with 1) a dropoff in production from Vazquez (highly probable) and 1a) JV’s contract for next year.

We got fantastic value and did even more to secure cost certainty for 2012-2013 when all these young arms hit the big leagues.

What are you gonna complain about in 2013 when JJ and Hanson are making the big $$ and we have several major league minimum studs to choose from?

How many times do you have to be told that we don’t have $150MM to spend? Why don’t you re-focus your efforts in trying to get fans to actually go to the effing park? That would get us the extra $11.5MM that we could just p!$$ away…

This rotation (and pen) will be the finest in all baseball this year, barring substantial injury.

Herschel Talker

February 9th, 2010
12:08 pm

MB:

When it comes to slamming the imbecile that is Frank Wreck, all I can say is that you are the man! He is a boob of the highest order. He tries to sell us on Melky Cabrera. Does he think we’re all idiots? What a jerk.

HT

Herschel Talker

February 9th, 2010
12:08 pm

Chuck – STFU

Chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:10 pm

Intelligent response Herschel…do you buy tix to games? Or just troll the internet spewing hate?

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:11 pm

Let me be clear about this, Herschel: I had no problem with what Wren did last offseason. It was this one that stumped me.

Jim A

February 9th, 2010
12:11 pm

Yeah, Herschel, way to add to the conversation.

shmoe

February 9th, 2010
12:11 pm

We’re not depending on Hudson to be a #1 anymore. Hanson established himself as the future ace last year, and this year will go along way to further solidify that. Everyone should know this. And if JJ is not a #1, he is a very good #2. Hudson, #3 if healthy is no slouch. #4 and 5 to Lowe and KK in any order really, doesn’t matter much to me. I think this is still VERY strong, especially for the NL.

siskel_god

February 9th, 2010
12:12 pm

MB, the rotation is the least of my concerns. Does it really surprise you that somebody from espn has the Red Sox and Yankees 1-2? There are so many questions about the Braves rotation but I guess those questions don’t apply to Boston and New York. The Sox got Lackey and Daisuke coming off of injury years and the Yanks got A.J. (who is the ultimate enigma), Joba, and Pettite. How does that rotation have less questions then the Braves? Go up and down the list and tell me who you would rather have, 1) Hudson, CC, or Beckett? CC hands down. 2) Lester, Burnett, or JJ? JJ very close over Lester. 3) Hanson, Pettite, or Lackey? Hanson and it’s not even close IMO. 4) Lowe, Javy, or Daisuke? Javy, but his numbers are really not that impressive for his career, he has certainly had worse years than D-Lowe had last year 5) Joba, Buccholz, or KK? Prolly Buccholz for the same reasons I like Hanson. Now, by my logic the Braves are better than the Yanks and maybe just a step below the Sox because I like Wakefield and the minor league depth a little better. But top to bottom, I’ll take the Braves over any other staff. KK is clearly better than the “someone else” the Cards will trot out and the fact that Freddy Garcia, Brad Penny and Jamie Moyer are on the lists of the top five staffs is a joke. What about San Fran and the Rays?

DawgInDC

February 9th, 2010
12:12 pm

I’ll be waiting to hear wren’s excuses come sept on why we are 3rd in the east again

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
12:12 pm

I wouldn’t trade our rotation for anybody’s in the MLB, saying that I must point out that Frank Wren is still an idiot trading Vasquez for a couple of bottle waters

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:13 pm

Hudson is a better pitcher historically. He was cheaper. Everybody loved Javier…but….

Sometimes tough decisions need to be made on a budget (see every household in the US)

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:14 pm

Buster Olney mentions San Francisco and Tampa Bay in the same paragraph as the Braves.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:15 pm

Anyone who is negative on the work Wren has done is foolish…we are trying to move into a new era.

I am sick of reading complaints on here from fans who can’t be bothered to get us up into the $3MM range it’ll take to expand the payroll or potentially get a deep pocket owner interested in us.

Wren has us positioned very well for the future, with a very good chance to earn a playoff spot this year. On $90MM (or slightly less); you really can’t ask for much more.

jmarable

February 9th, 2010
12:16 pm

does not matter what the rotation looks like,check out that weak outfield,worst in baseball.everyone uses a lot of if’s when talking about the infield,if the 1stbaseman stays health,if chipper stays health,what if prado has a good yr.to many if’s.what if hudson stays healthy,after jj and hanson,u basically got an average pitching staff to go along with no run support=LAST PLACE.Hello basement here we come.believe it.liberty group has got 2 turn this team over to someone who wants to win.not save money and charge 12 bucks a beer.and 6 bucks a hot dog.Come on man.at those prices we should b able to afford one bopper in the outfield.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
12:16 pm

Bobby Cox we will miss you, please take over for Frank Wren

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:16 pm

Buster doesn’t get out of the NE, and he is no Gammons….don’t know where he moved in and took over as baseball’s pre-eminent source for info.

If I need Sox/Yanks insight, he’ll be the first I look to…otherwise…

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:17 pm

Typo on that $3MM…i meant 3 million fans…

C. Tampa Ironworse

February 9th, 2010
12:17 pm

Wow..Yankees and Sox at the top(suprise). It’s not like ESPN gets on its knees to sell to those two markets…oh, wait a minute. Give me a break. Can you really rely someone name Buster? It’s all about getting people to register and those two markets DRIVE baseball. Beat it, Buster…

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:18 pm

Melky will most likely be traded, Herschel…please follow the team a little…

Either Damon or Heyward will make him expendable by mid-year. If not prior.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
12:19 pm

we need our Swagger back, give me a break, stop putting the Phillies on a pedestal, I don’t care how good you think they are, to me they will always be the bottom dwelling Phillies from Veteran’s stadium. If you treat them like crap you will have some confidence to win.

I repeat The Phillies are garbage, regardless of going to two straight world series

one more thing….please stop pitching Ryan Howard outside where he can get his hands extended.

I can count on 2 hands how many times Ryan Howard has single handily won the game with an outside pitch.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:19 pm

Buster Olney went to Vanderbilt. Just so you know.

SC Ace

February 9th, 2010
12:20 pm

I wish we’d been able to trade DLowe instead of Vazquez, but it is what it is. Lowe will be serviceable and we still have JJ, Hanson, and Hudson. Kawakami is more than adequate in the 5 slot. I’ll take it. Let’s just hope nobody gets hurt!

But boy doesn’t out-of-state corporate ownership suck?

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:21 pm

Has he left NYC/Bristol in 5 years?

And now you’ve classified him as a sissy bookworm to boot…for shame.

C. Tampa Ironworse

February 9th, 2010
12:23 pm

Buster went to Vandy…Whoop T. Stephan Maurberry and Dennis Scott went to Tech and Bush went to Yale. Just so you’ll know…

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:23 pm

Keep in mind, SC, if you take out Lowe’s worst 5 starts, his ERA drops a whole point, take out his next 3, and its in the low 3s…

I’ll take 26 starts a year in the low 3s…how bout you? His power #s were down, and that’s a concern, and I would have agreed subsidizing up to 12MM of the contract to be done with him and keep JV…but it ain’t my money.

Jt

February 9th, 2010
12:25 pm

I like Olney, but the White Sox at number 3 with Peavy at the top of the rotation? He is a much bigger question mark in my opinion than Hudson. And the Phillies at 5A? Halladay is a true number one- Hamels could be a great number 2 IF he returns to 2008 form. But I would take the any bottom 3 of the Braves rotation easily over the Phillies bottom 3. Kawakami over Moyer- D. Lowe over Blanton- Hanson or Hudson easily ove Happ. So, I guess that is why they will play the games.

WHopper Dawg

February 9th, 2010
12:26 pm

Yep, can’t turn the Vazquez move into chicken salad. It is what it is.

Kelly's Johnson

February 9th, 2010
12:29 pm

We got NOTHING for Vazquez and depending on Hudson to regain his Oakland form. Ain’t happening ! Kawakami is average; Lowe is average. Hansen & Jurrjens are only reliable studs. Medlin should get a shot at starting instead of being wasted in the bullpen. Third place at best !

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:30 pm

I’ll take Hanson v Halladay and call it a wash…

I’ll put Lowe up v Hamels and say that we will get the more consistent season.

And the bottom 3…no contest…

The Phils shouldn’t have traded Lee, they are gonna need him.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:32 pm

Kawakami had some of the best #s in baseball from July on…Lowe pitched well in 3/4 of his starts…and Vazquez never before and never again will have the season he did last year.

People on here know nothing…read some more box scores….idiots.

Count on Huddy for 14 wins and a sub 4 ERA…not bad for your #4….buncha negative putos and pendejos here.

Braves Fan

February 9th, 2010
12:32 pm

We got a potential stud in that deal. I think it clearly detracted a little from the 2010 rotation but may have greatly enhanced the 2012 rotation. The GM has to consider more than the next season in building a franchise. I do wish we had Javy this season but we don’t. Wren has to play the cards he was dealt and I am not ready to start bashing him before pitchers and catchers report.

It easy to say “sell high, buy low” but much harder to have the guts to do it.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:32 pm

I think the Phillies will regret not having Lee, Chuck. But that was a payroll decision they made. It cuts both ways.

Here's the skinny

February 9th, 2010
12:34 pm

Frank Wren is a EFFING MORON. On a level of 1 to 10 of SUCKNESS with 10 being ‘in another cozmos sucky’[ Wren is a 15…

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:34 pm

I think, Braves Fan, the Vazquez trade would have gone over much better had it involved a run-producer. As it was, the Braves dumped their best pitcher of 2009 and didn’t address their real need.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:37 pm

Well, Mark, you talk about a tipping point of $11.5MM on a guy who WOULDN’T have guaranteed us a world title (JV)…

but wouldn’t it have been smarter for Philly to not re-up Halladay yet, and keep Lee long-term, and use Roy as the rental…would have guaranteed a title this year (IMO)…

I always thought when you had a title in your grasp, you go for it…

Bruce Chen

February 9th, 2010
12:38 pm

“Wren has us positioned very well for the future, with a very good chance to earn a playoff spot this year.”

Again this year major question marks on offense and the bullpen. Anyone you can go into the year knowing for sure what they’ll do? I guess the closest thing would be Mcann, but that’s not a good sign when your best player is the catcher.
1b/3b injury prone players. One playing 1b for the first time.
2b first year as a starter
ss pretty solid
cf hoping for a bounce back year
lf/rf filled by 4th outfielders or a rookie

Bullpen
8th/9th inning guys – 39/40 year olds both had major surgeries in the last couple years.

A lot of question marks for this team, just like last year…

Matt

February 9th, 2010
12:40 pm

Once again the Braves success this season rests on a bunch of “ifs”.

Skeezix

February 9th, 2010
12:41 pm

Of course Buster is right–with Vasquez, the Braves had one of the best rotations in MLB. Also, Wren has weakened the pen by letting Soriano go. The guys he has added for offense are very average hitters–so no additional offense to offset the weaker pitching. At best, the Braves are a second place team. How Wren keeps his job continues to amaze me. Is he related to a key Liberty Media executive? Or is it that he is just what Liberty Media wants in that job—a compliant yes man/lap dog/lackey.

DawgfaninJesup

February 9th, 2010
12:41 pm

Fearless prognostication: Come July or sooner everyone in New York will be wondering why they traded anyone for Vazquez. His ERA will be at least 4.75 and he will not be in the rotation. Take it to the bank.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:41 pm

The relievers being old and off of surgery doesn’t concern me for this year. Most times, guys coming off those surgeries are fresh. Look at Moylan throwing a team record for appearances 11 months removed from TJ…

Wagner is a rude little specimen with great mechanics. I expect 45 saves.

Saito has never been less than nasty. I expect our best 8th inning guy since Remlinger.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
12:42 pm

Mark,

Would you please list one possible trade scenario for Wren to have traded Lowe or Javy that would have pleased you? Every article you write about the Braves is about Wren’s mistakes, please enlighten me with another option. Please be realistic, we arent the Yankees or BoSox.

Scott

February 9th, 2010
12:44 pm

Are you guys saying we should have kept all six of our starting pitchers (since we couldn’t get rid of Lowe) and just not signed anyone else this year?

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
12:44 pm

That’s the point, NCbravesFan. I wouldn’t have traded either. Can’t have too much starting pitcher, I say.

Bruce Chen

February 9th, 2010
12:47 pm

I hope “Chuck” is right b/c according to him the Braves should finish about 122-40 with everyone having career years.

Herschel Talker

February 9th, 2010
12:47 pm

Chuck – Melky will most likely be traded for what? A bad middle reliever? Does that now justify the trade? That doesn’t take away from my initial point.

If it was about payroll, then Frank Wreck should come out and say that. Don’t tell us it’s not about payroll and tell us that trading Vazquez for Cabrera was because Cabrera is such a valuable piece. That is the height of arrogance, to assume we are so stupid.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
12:47 pm

To anyone that worries about Wagner and Saito. Did you EVER feel secure with our bullpen the last two years? Gonzo and Soriano both came off of surgery themselves in the last 2 seasons and they have yet to ever produce a full season as a dominant closer. When Soriano was on, he was nasty but how many game winning HR’s did he give up last year? How many times did Gonzo come in walk the first 2 guys and squeak out of the inning with a K and double play? Too often for me!!

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:48 pm

But Mark, our salary would’ve been like $42MM for 4 pitchers (Huddy, Lowe, JV, KK) and $45MM for 21 other players…that is unbalanced…

Do people not put any stock in Vizcaino? That is a HUGE piece for a couple years from now. And i have middling hopes for Dunn as well…Melky is an expendable afterthought that may be able to help for a short while.

First of all...

February 9th, 2010
12:48 pm

We signed Melky Cabrera in the offseason. All of our prayers have been answered.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:49 pm

But Herschel the piece was Vizcaino…and salary relief…both necessary evils when operating on a budget. Melky, like i said, was just a piece that we could fit in in addition to the minor league arms and extra saves so we could go get a potential 35 HR guy in Glaus, and a solid bench player in Hinske.

Herschel Talker

February 9th, 2010
12:50 pm

MB:

I’m glad you don’t have a problem with Wreck. But I do. Troy Glaus is a disgraced ex-roid user and should be nowhere near first base. His idea of acquiring a big bat is Glaus and Hinske. Meanwhile, who is our leadoff hitter? Why isn’t he getting Johnny Damon? He signs Billy Wagner because he thinks Soriano won’t accept arbitration. Then Soriano does. Then he gets on sports talk radio and tells us that it won’t be a problem unloading Soriano because the market for closers had barely gotten going (which was affirmed by his ability to dump Soriano rather quickly). Well, Frank, if the market for closers had barely gotten going, then what was the urgency to sign Wagner before waiting to see if Soriano would accept? So he aged our bullpen by a ton, for similar money as we paid for Gonzo and Soriano. The man is an arrogant jerk and a putz.

HT

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
12:50 pm

So Mark, you want to put KK as a $7mil middle relief pitcher? It’s easy to say “dont trade either” but we all knew someone was getting traded? Please list another team with 6 SP? Boston is the only one and that including Wakefield, who really isnt a full season pitcher anymore.

TommyP

February 9th, 2010
12:51 pm

Listing the Phils in that top 6 is absurd. Olney loses credibility with that one.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:51 pm

Gonzo loved to create innings out of nothing….up 0-2 with an out, hit a batter, wild pitch him over, base hit, boom…blown hold…

But i wasn’t worried about their arms, because as i said before, most guys coming off the surgeries are pretty much immune for a year or two (if they have good mechanics).

Frank Wren

February 9th, 2010
12:52 pm

If you fans are confused and angry, find solace in the fact that I don’t understand my bone headed trades either.

rlinaug

February 9th, 2010
12:53 pm

Jamie Moyer? Is Pedro no longer a Phil? If not, where is he? He’s a huge upgrade over Moyer.

Herschel Talker

February 9th, 2010
12:53 pm

Chuck – if the piece was Vizcaino, which is a fair point, then he should not be so arrogant not to tell us that it’s about dumping salary and getting prospects like the Pirates and Royals do. If he’s hamstrung because corporate is dictating such, then keep it real, and I think most of us will accept that he is hamstrung. But he tells us how great a piece Cabrera was in NY, and how much he’ll add to our team. Meanwhile, Cabrera hit 12 HRs in the new Yankee Stadium, in a year I believe the Yankees set a team record for HRs (you can correct that if it’s wrong). Some piece we got there. We all know it’s a salary dump, so he should not be so arrogant to assume we won’t see through his nonsense.

Liberty Media

February 9th, 2010
12:54 pm

If you fans don’t like it, you can eat cake!

chuck

February 9th, 2010
12:55 pm

I agree the PR is posturing nonsense…but we are smart enough to know as fans that cap relief was chief…i don’t need him to tell me.

Not sure how many ABs he got to hit those 12, if it was 400 or more or not…i need to look it up. But i don’t think he’ll be around for long.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
12:57 pm

HT,

Since when does an owner, GM, or manager ever have to “inform the fanbase” of any reasoning behind trades or any disclosure of payroll? I would like you to show me where the pirates and royals managment posts their “Im sorry’s” to there fans? I would like to read that!

collegeballfan

February 9th, 2010
12:57 pm

I offer you the following tidbit:

“On August 12, 1987, the Atlanta Braves dealt pitcher Doyle Alexander to the Detroit Tigers for minor league pitcher John Smoltz.”

If I recall correctly, A – Smoltz was a year out of high school and B – Alexander was the Braves ace.

I am not saying the Vazquez for Vizcaino trade will be just as rich for the Braves. But lets see Vizcaino in two or three years.

CJ

February 9th, 2010
12:59 pm

It is a solid rotation, but not elite. With the Braves hitting, we needed something elite. Thanks Frank, for Jack Sh!t! Traded Vasquez for absolutely nothing. GO GET US A HITTER THAT IS IN HIS MID 20′S AND NOT DETERIORATING FROM ROIDS!

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
12:59 pm

Mark,

Im still waiting on a trade scenario?

Or are you just dodging that question with the “dont trade either” comment?

Grey Dog

February 9th, 2010
1:01 pm

Pitching staff will be OK but Braves still need a BIG STAR BAT ! Chipper is always hurt, McCann can’t play everyday and fans want a Superstar in the lineup! There is no Superstar and of course Damon is not the answer! Stars put butts in the seats!

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
1:01 pm

CJ,

Wren did “go get us a hitter in his 20’s”….it wasnt a trade, it wasnt a free agent, it was doing NOTHING to block Jason Heyward or Freddie Freeman from their path to the pro’s!

CJ

February 9th, 2010
1:11 pm

NCbravesFAN,

I really do hope to see them up there! I think Frank sat too long on Hanson and that is why we missed the playoffs AGAIN! There is a good chance we see neither of those guys at the start of the year with that @$$ hole Wren running things!

ynot

February 9th, 2010
1:13 pm

I wish we could all play with “Yankees money”. You had to know someone was going. Sorry, it had to be Vazquez. Hopefully, they use that money wisely.

Knockahoma

February 9th, 2010
1:13 pm

I really can’t see the Phillies in the top 10 with Hamels and Moyer.
The Angels are also a surprise without Lackey. Are they asuming Carpenter (St Louis) and Peavy (White Sox) will return to their
old form after injuries? If so let’s assume the same with Hudson.
The trade of Vazquez would have never have happened if there had been
a market for Lowe but someone’s salary had to go, unfortunately.
One name on the list which should haunt Atl is Wainwright. He was traded in the JD Drew trade. This one may mirror the Smoltz-Alexander
trade.

Connie Mack

February 9th, 2010
1:14 pm

Buster Olney has no credibility? The Braves have not seen a post-season since 2005; or World Series in 11 years. The Braves and their fans have ZERO credibility. You can only milk the “14 Consecutive division championships” nonsense for so long. That doesn’t play in NY, Boston or Philly. Nowhere but Atlanta do division crowns count for anything.

CJ

February 9th, 2010
1:17 pm

Connie Mack,

GO BACK TO NY you COMMIE

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
1:17 pm

CJ,

Im not so harsh on Wren, the man has a budget from crappy ownership, and deals with a fanbase that wont sell out a playoff game.

There are huge financial benefits to keeping these guys down in AAA until a certain date. Thats why Medlen came up before Hanson last year (his ceiling is lower and so will be his next contract).

That may be the only benefit from keeping Heyward down to start this year, they seem to WANT him to make the team and make an impact! I dont expect FF until 2011, barring an exceptional start at gwinnett and injuries to the big club.

Knockahoma

February 9th, 2010
1:18 pm

Mark, Don’t short-change Troy Glaus. He’s got a lot of pop and the
Braves obviously believe he is healthy or they would not have pd him
2 M + incentives. The move to 1B will be easy for him (he’s a former
SS in college with good hands.

Taco Bell makes me fart

February 9th, 2010
1:19 pm

I agree with CJ, we should have at least got someone under 30 that has actually not platooned with someone else and has been a starter for once. I know we have a budget and blah blah blah but c’mon every GM in the league could have at least got 1 player that could have been more than a backup/platoon guy for one of the best pitchers in the NL. Heck, if he had some run support this year, Javy might have won the Cy Young. I dont care if the prospects might be the greatest on earth (usually with the NY media, every Yankees prospect is) if they are 19 years old, then they arent going to do you much good anytime soon and by the time they are the team will be totally different and have new issues to deal with so its better to get at least a prospect that has played AAA or AA ball so you know they can come up to the big leagues sometime in the next 2 years. Way to go Wren, quit taking advice from Don Waddell…

clemson2388

February 9th, 2010
1:21 pm

As much as I do not like the fact that we did not get a starting player back in the Vazquez trade, I honestly think we will be looking back at this trade as genius for the LONG run. Lets be honest we weren’t gonna win a world series this year even with vazquez. But what this trade has done is potentially set up the most dominant Rotation in the past 10 years of baseball in future seasons.

We have a INFLUX of future stars at pitcher.

If we are able to keep Jair and Hanson long term we could possibly be looking at a rotation of:

Jair Jurjeans 24 RHP
Tommy Hanson 23 RHP
Julio Tehran 19 RHP
Mike Minor 22 LHP
Arodys Vizcaino 19 RHP

With Craig Kimbrel RHP as the future closer.

That roster is worth salivating over. I mean seriously. You gotta look at the future with this trade getting Viscaino. Yes we lose Vazquez who had the single BEST season of his career. But for a guy thats been around for so long and not matched his past season more than once in a row how can you say he would have definitely matched last season. I don’t buy it. Vazquez has always been a fickle pitcher.

Man I can’t wait for two or three years from now to see the youth coming into the rotation. I personally love the trade. We weren’t going to win the world series this year, might as well grab a STUD arm for the future!

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
1:22 pm

Knockahoma,

It does suck to see Wainwright doing so well for the Cards but he was only a prospect and JD Drew had a great season as a Brave and helped us continue our playoff run. That seems to qualify as a good trade for both teams…although, I wish management would have had more foresight (like they seem to now) and started to rebuild instead of trading young talent for another “shot” at the postseason. The Tex trade is another example of that.

Reality Check

February 9th, 2010
1:22 pm

Mark, it has to be said, if you keep Vaquez and Hudson, and do not pick up Melky’s Salary and Troy Glaus.Hinske, have the money would not be that much more. We did not pick up much value for letting Vazquez’s salary go. Two part time major leaguers and a first baseman that was hurt all of last year.

Supposedly last year was plan A to improve pitching and this year management would address the run production, however, no real attempt was made in this area. Very dissapointing and for all those fans that say the Braves scored more runs the second half of the season we no longer have Adam Laroche, who was the biggest run producer after the all star break.

1eyedJack

February 9th, 2010
1:23 pm

I think ol’ Buster’s logic is kind a skewed. How can he put Boston #1? Wasn’t DiceK hurt most of last year and have arm problems and isn’t Wakefield as old as Niekro?

Yankees have Pettite who is a dinosaur and is Phil Hughes a proven commodity?

Chris Carpenter and Brad Penny are waiting for their arms to fall off.

JA Happ was a rookie last year and may never approach that level again and Jamie Moyer is first cousins to Methusala.

The Braves rotation has a chance to be as good or better than any of these.

Jason

February 9th, 2010
1:28 pm

Vasquez is coming off the best year of his CAREER. Yes he was great last year but he is a career .500 pitcher. Geez stop acting like we gave away Greg Maddux. We’re lucky we got back a stud SP prospect and #3-4 OF for one year of him. Also, I’ll take Tim Hudson AND Derek Lowe’s stats over Vasquez’s at the end of this year, any day. Lowe had the worst year of his career and still won 15 games. Hudson has been a little disappointing as a Brave yes but he is a career 148-78, and is finally healthy. Plus we’ll have a full year of Hansen. Health permitting, I think our rotation will be even better than last year’s. And every rotation in baseball is dependent upon good health (except maybe Red Sox, who have 6). Look the Braves are obviously cash strapped and it sucks. But let’s not be so short-sighted and stop acting like losing Javy Vasquez is going to be the end all be all for this team.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
1:31 pm

No salary cap in baseball, Chuck. At least last I checked. (There is, however, a luxury tax.)

Knockahoma

February 9th, 2010
1:34 pm

1 eyed Jack,You’re exactly right. Almost every one of those rotations
has more ? marks than the Braves. Why didn’t he assume that Lowe and
Hudson would return to normal form. Also KK pitched fine after April
which was an adjustment period for him. Also, pitching in the 5th
spot will allow him to rest frequently.

ITP Brave

February 9th, 2010
1:39 pm

I’m thrilled that the Braves were able to help the Yankees make it into the top 3 rotations. Maybe next we can help the Red Sox beef up their lineup by giving them Chipper or Escobar for a lobster roll and a bag of balls.

Is it too late to trade Wren to the Royals for Dayton Moore?

On another note, I see that Jermaine Dye is still looking for a contract. If the Braves are really that interested in another outfielder (which I presume they are with all of the write-ups on Damon), why don’t the Braves spend a few million on a bat that will actually benefit the lineup with some HRs?

Bernard

February 9th, 2010
1:41 pm

The Braves are approaching moron status. Allowing the much over rated Bobby “Charlie Liebrant” Cox return as mgr and GIVING away their ACE!!!????… its going to be another long hot boring summer of MEDIOCRE Braves baseball.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
1:41 pm

Mark,

Im still waiting for your expertise??

PLEASE give me another scenario of ANY trade Wren could have done? We can leave Javy and Lowe out of it.

You are quick to bash his moves but never offer any other suggestions.

Im waiting…

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
1:43 pm

Damon 2010 = R.Church 2009
J.Dye 2010 = G.Anderson 2009

We do not need any more old guys!

ITP Brave

February 9th, 2010
1:45 pm

1eyedjack… turn the Bravo-colored glasses around for a second. You’ll see that:

1) Lowe is old and coming off of his worst season ever, possibly a sign that he’s well past his prime. (Another red flag is that no one would sniff at his contract in a trade)

2) Hudson is coming off of tommy john and is “waiting for his arm to fall off” as you like to say.

3) KK is old, unpredictable, and has not shown that he can be a consistent starter in the US.

4) Hanson was a rookie last season, just like JA Happ.

At this rate, JJ is the only solid bet that the Braves have. Based on last season’s performance (which is the closest thing to compare to the upcoming season), Vasquez was even more of a lock to be the best pitcher on this team. People seem to forget that if he had any run support in 2009, Vasquez would have likely won well over 20 games and probably won the Cy Young.

Herschel Talker

February 9th, 2010
1:48 pm

NCBravesFan – you’re right. They don’t have to explicitly tell us that. But then don’t explicitly tell us the exact opposite, which is exactly what he did. He said there were no payroll constraints from corporate driving his decision. We all know that his a bald-faced lie.

TruthSeeker

February 9th, 2010
1:49 pm

Fire Frank Wren. This was one of the most half-@ssed attempts at constructing a team I’ve ever seen. We were a good offseason from being a legitimate contender to win the National League, and Wren instead made us worse for no apparent reason (it wasn’t like payroll was considerably slashed).

I just don’t feel good about this team. Too much has to go right. Our big offseason moves (Hudson, Glaus, Wagner) were all on guys coming off major injuries. Maybe if Chipper bounces back with a big year, and if Glaus gives us the power we’re craving, and if JJ Jurrjens and Hanson don’t have a dropoff then we’ll have a shot at the playoffs. But this team looks like a house of cards to me.

1eyedJack

February 9th, 2010
1:49 pm

Just sayin’ that all those rotations have just as many questions as ours.

Hambone

February 9th, 2010
1:50 pm

Ok is it just me but does anyone else think that its stupid to act like DLowe isn’t gonna be better than last year without a doubt… i mean yea he had a bad year but in ‘02 he posted a 2.58 ERA, then went on to post a 4.42 ERA the next year, only to bounce back with two years of an ERA in the 3.60’s and I think Cole Hamels, who had a huge dropoff, was as much of a disappointment as DLowe but apparently this list doesnt think so. I’d rather have the veteran who has already proved he can bounce back, rather than Hamels who might not be as good as people thought. Either way, Roy Halladay is better than any of the braves starters (until Hanson reaches his potential) but JJ is better than any of the other Phillies guys. Hanson over JJHapp anyday. Also, KK (braves’ number 5) had better stats that all but one of Joe Blantons (phill’s number 3) seasons and I would take KK over Jamie Moyer, too. As Hudson, I think other than ’06 he has been good in atl. From 07-08 he had good stats, including ERAs under 3.30, he just never met his wins total from Oakland, but this is when the braves offense sucked worse than now. I think I could also make cases against the Braves being better than some of the other rotations, as well, but I don’t have time… Fluid Mechanics test tomm…..

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
1:50 pm

Let me get this logic straight…having Vasquez as the #4 starter in their rotation only makes the Yankees #2 on the list, but somehow if Vasquez was the Braves #1 starter that would have the Braves up at #3 on the list?

Either Buster is undervaluing Vasquez for the Yankees or overvaluing him for the Braves.

He might have a point that the Red Sox are #1, I guess since they get to pitch 6 starters somehow (?), but exactly which of the Yankees starters are better than Jair Jurrjens? CC is their best guy, and I think its a toss up at best between Jurrjens and CC.

No one will convince me that AJ Burnett or Andy Pettite (at his current age) are better than Tim Hudson and Tommy Hanson. One guy is 38 and the other is an injury machine.

Lowe and Vasquez, all you have to do is look at the offseason two years ago to see how each was viewed. Universally Lowe would have been considered more consistent. But Vasquez has one great season, despite a track record of ERA’s well over 4.50 with a few decent seasons mixed in. He might have turned a corner and become an ace, but until he proves it, I feel like it’s a safer bet that Lowe returns to his pre-2009 form than Vasquez repeats his upper tier performance.

Then Kawakami is way better than Phil Hughes. The proof? When has Hughes beaten either Roy Halladay, Johan Santana or Dice K, much less all three in one season? Never is when.

So I think I’ve just given a decent argument that the Braves are better than the #2 rotation on the list. Any reason to compare the rest of the top five?

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
1:55 pm

HT,

His decision to trade a SP was more on the fact that he wanted the security and price of Hudson for the next 3 years instead of the HOPE that J.vaz could repeat 2009 again (his career numbers say otherwise) and if he came close we wouldnt be able to afford him anyway!

So you expect the GM of a team to say “Well, lets see here, all I could get was some 4th OF named Melky something or other, and some prospects” NO, he wont do that! Baseball is a business and Liberty is his Boss, he cannot bad mouth his boss or he would get fired. Your requests for honesty are unreasonable. If Wren was your friend and he told you lies than you should be offended…but assuming he isnt. Quit expecting him to disclose all of his jobs details to us.

Hambone

February 9th, 2010
1:57 pm

i completely agree ramblin wrecker

Elmore Spencer

February 9th, 2010
1:58 pm

The (thin) reasoning: That Javier Vazquez was unlikely to have such a season again

Its not that thin. He wont.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:00 pm

Thanks for a logical post Wrecker! A lot of negativity spewed on these blogs.

That is what Bradley wants though.

Mark Bradley = TMZ reporter

Still waiting Mark….

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
2:01 pm

You’ll be waiting longer, NC. I don’t respond well to namecalling.

Alex

February 9th, 2010
2:05 pm

Mark, you’re not paying attention are you? Trading JV wasn’t something Wren ever wanted to do but he had to b/c they couldn’t afford to keep everyone. After finding no takers for first choice DLowe, he shipped the only other possible chip – and a guy with one year left on his contract who just had a career year. USE YOUR BRAIN.

TruthSeeker

February 9th, 2010
2:05 pm

NCbravesFan, I’ve gotta disagree with your comparing Damon and Dye to Church and Anderson. Damon and Dye are both coming off above average offensive seasons (100+ OPS+). When we acquired Church he was clearly never the same guy after his severe concussion, and Anderson had been a pretty useless player for a couple of years.

It’s probably a moot point to be discussing since Wren seems to have dug his heels in and is maintaining that the roster reconstruction is pretty much complete, but Damon would bring a lot to our offense. God forbid we add a guy with solid on-base skills and decent power at a bargain-basement price.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:05 pm

“So I guess that makes two among us who haven’t quite grasped the offseason Zen of Wren — Buster O. and yours truly. But you are, as ever, free to tell me how obstinately obtuse I am.”

Im sorry to offend you Mark, all I wanted was simple response to a logical Braves baseball question. Obviously you dont have one.

Thanks for your insight!

Steve K

February 9th, 2010
2:06 pm

Mark: Why are you so up in arms over this trade? I understand that Javier Vazquez had an excellent year for us last year, but do you realize the man has had only two back-to-back winning seasons in his 12 year career? His overall career record is 142-139 with a 4.19 ERA and his W-L% is .505. These stats are pretty pedestrian. I believe the Braves are in good hands and I am tired of you guys playing Monday morning quarterback. Have trust in the Braves’ management. After all, they won 14 straight Division titles, not you or Buster Olney!

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:12 pm

Truth Seeker…look at Dye’s second half numbers, they arent pretty. I was making the GA reference to Dye’s OF ability more than his bat.

Damons career numbers dont reflect last season, that was more of a New Yankee Stadium boost. He is a good player but we really dont have a spot on the roster or in the payroll for him. Only Boras and Damon know what he will take to sign. Everyone just assumes if the Braves offered him 3mil he would sign. From what I hear, he wants 2 years period. I think 2years 12-14mil is what it will take to sign him. I dont have any proof, just my opinion.

As much as I dont like the idea of Damon being a Brave, I do like the fact that his signing “might” and thats a big might, excite the fans and sell more tickets. That is ultimately what needs to happen to be able to pay out the big contracts in the future.

papadawg

February 9th, 2010
2:15 pm

Gimme a break, Hudson as good as Vasquez, no way even when Hudson can stay off the DL with Chipper he couldn’t carry Vasquezs glove

JEZ

February 9th, 2010
2:16 pm

What’s funny to be about the article is that the braves had the best over all ERA in all of baseball last year…so why in the world would BO not even put them on the list. I’m glad it all depends on him! NOT!

chas

February 9th, 2010
2:19 pm

I don’t have a problem with the Vazquez trade even though I don’t like the short term results. We got burned a few times too many in the past with short term returns (i.e. J.D. Drew trade). The modern day Braves act much more like a small market team with limited resources even though that is painful to watch sometimes. If we really thought that we had a legitimate shot to resign Vazquez at a discount price then perhaps this was a gamble not worth taking, but I don’t know if that was feasible or not. If Vazquez had another great year with us this year then could we have afforded to sign him to a big, long term contract? We will need those resources in the next few years to sign some of the young players. Signing Hudson was really what drove Vazquez away and then the inability to trade Lowe. But, what are the odds that Lowe will have another stinker year while Vazquez has another stellar year. With this being said, if you don’t have Vizcaino in the trade then it is a real stinker. There are still some major what ifs to this team in terms of health and production, but if we stay healthy I think we’ll be very competitive.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:21 pm

Papadawg…Here is some info for you dont sound so uniformed next time.

(1) Javier Vazquez has never had a season to match what he did last year, and with a career ERA of 4.19, odds are he’ll never have another season like last year, (2) Tim Hudson actually had a 16-and-10 season in 2007, winning percentage-wise better than Vazquez’ 2009, and (3) Hudson’s career 3.49 ERA — over a half run better than Javy’s — should tell us that at virtually the same age, Hudson is a more sure bet to have a good season than Vazquez. Hudson has also never had a losing season, Vazquez has had five. Hudson has only one major DL stint in his career.

TruthSeeker

February 9th, 2010
2:21 pm

NC, I’m actually kind of with you on Dye. I don’t think he’d be enough of an upgrade over Melky/Heyward to be worth whatever he’d cost, and I definitely wouldn’t want him taking at-bats away from Diaz, who is clearly the better hitter at this point in their careers.

Damon makes perfect sense to me, though, if the reports that he’s going to have to settle for $3M are true. While his numbers clearly got a boost from the new Yankee Stadium, he did post a very solid .795 OPS in road games last year, and he had a 118 OPS+ in his last season in the old ballpark.

Damon is still a very dependable ballplayer who would bring plate discipline and power, both things that I think we can all agree the Braves could use more of. He’d also allow us to be a bit more patient with Heyward. I really can’t see a downside (other than his mediocre defense), so it’s puzzling to me why we haven’t been more aggressive in going after him.

cantondawg

February 9th, 2010
2:24 pm

I agree also…Javier Vazquez pitched very good for us last year but the most impressive thing about him is his durabily. He never gets hurt and you can alway pencil him in for 200 innings. I was mystified why we signed TH to a contract after the injury problems that we had. By doing that, Wren had no choice but to trade Vazquez. But, i do think the Pitching will be great again this year. Hanson and Jurrjens are going to be allstars. I think DL will pick up his game this year. Hudson will do fine if he can stay healthy. KK cannot do any worse than he did last year. The big question mark is the bullpen. I don’t think BW will be as good as Soriano and Gonzalez

JabboRockefeller

February 9th, 2010
2:25 pm

Hudson’s the pitcher who shoulda been dealt. Period.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:26 pm

PapaDawg…show me the empirical evidence that demonstrates Vazquez is a better pitcher for his career than Hudson….

Hudson in his last full healthy year with Braves: 16-10, 3.33 ERA…his career #s in slowpitch softball AL: 92-39, 3.30 ERA…his career 162 game avg: 16-9, 3.49 ERA…

Vazquez: 15-10, 2.87 in his best year ever last year…Javier going back to AL where his career #s are 52-46, with a 4.52 ERA…Javier had 3 years that even compare with Huddy (2001, 2007, 2009)…

Hudson went on the DL with a TJ…people bounce back pretty good from those. He is not a career long nagging injury type.

Get informed buddy.

papadawg

February 9th, 2010
2:28 pm

NC fan Hudson probably won’t have a year like Vasquezs last year either and he is showing signs of making regular trips to the DL. but the Braves do prefer older players

Jack

February 9th, 2010
2:28 pm

We can speculate all we want… Everybody is looking into their crystal ball… This year like all years will be full of surprises… What I’m most thankful about is we are getting close to seeing the real answers that will show up on the field and in the standings… Win or lose the Braves are my team and I can’t seem to change that! Go Braves!!!

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:30 pm

Truth, I cant argue that the Braves currently have anyone better suited for LF and leadoff than Damon, but I dont think he will go anywhere for 3mil, as wishfully reported by some AJC reporters.

I think that Melky/Diaz will offer just as much to the team as Damon would. I think his days as a speedy leadoff man are behind him. The guy can hit, no doubt about it, but it really helps to be surrounded by future HOF players such as Jeter, Tex, and Arod. If I was a pitcher and had to choose my poison in that group…it wouldnt even be a choice, I know who would be getting the fastballs!

JabboRockefeller

February 9th, 2010
2:30 pm

I can’t believe how folks hit KK with backhand criticism. The guy stood toe-to-toe with some great pitchers, and more often than not threw wonderfully. I’d much rather have him start a big game than Lowe.

TruthSeeker

February 9th, 2010
2:31 pm

It’s funny to me to hear the way some of you talk about Kawakami. You’d think he was throwing batting practice based on some of the comments. The guy gave up 3 ER or fewer in 19 of his last 21 starts. KK was rock solid, he just was victimized by horrific run support. I’m actually not worried about him at all. He’s a veteran who knows how to keep runs off the board. As long as he still has pretty decent stuff, he’ll be effective.

I’m more worried about Lowe. I’m not sure why everyone is so convinced he’s going to bounce back. His stuff is eroding fast.

BigTimeTECHFan

February 9th, 2010
2:32 pm

Over full career Lowe is way better then Vasquez. Facts would say Lowe will have better year this year, Vasquez will drop off. I think the bigger risk is that Vasquez would pull off anouther big year.

Braves did right.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:32 pm

Huddy went down for a year long injury, came back in 12 months, and pitched well in 7 appearances…this injury prone BS is retarded.

As for the trade, do you not think Wren beat the bushes? First off, JV didn’t want to go west of the MS, and told teams he wouldn’t re-sign, so that fuct us. Second of all, the salary scares away half the franchises (even on a one year rental) or do you guys not pay attn to the economy?

I guess half of you don’t have jobs, and don’t know the value of money. The team that dealt for him needed assurances that he would re-sign. Or be like the Yanks, who are looking to cut salary again next year.

When the Yanks are looking to cut salary, and the Sox are being financially prudent, you have to understand the climate you are operating in.

JabboRockefeller

February 9th, 2010
2:34 pm

The NY POST is reporting that Damon wants 22-mil for two-years with Detroit. And that’s the team he WANTS to play for.

Jared

February 9th, 2010
2:34 pm

just because you’re not alone doesn’t make you any less wrong, Mark.

If Cole Hamels is like he was last year, then the Braves clearly have the best rotation in the NL. Cardinals? They don’t even have a 5th penciled in yet. Does anyone think their 5th starter will be better than Hanson or Kawakami? Laughable. Lowe had a “terrible” year last year and won 15 games. Vazquez has a career ERA over 4 (last year was 2.87) yet everyone thinks he’ll repeat that? He is an innings and K machine. I’ve loved that about him all along and was very supportive of his signing when it happened.

All that time the same people who are complaining about him being traded now were complaining when we traded for him. Fact is, everybody loves to hate on the Braves front office because they’ve had to make tough decisions with our big name players AND they only win the WS once. That is, apparently, the front offices’ fault.

Fact is, I think both Lowe and Vazquez will return to their respective forms this year… Lowe as a ground-ball inducing machine with another 15 or so wins and an ERA around 3.20 and Vazquez as his usual 200+ IP, 200+ K, 10-10, 4.00 ERA self. There’s nothing wrong with that, but it is what it is. I’ll take Tim Hudson every day of the week of Javier Vazquez right now.

Do I wish the Braves could have gotten more for Javy coming off a great year? yes. And it is Wren’s fault for signing Lowe to an untradable deal last year. But I do not fault him for trading Vazquez in favor of Hudson.

Skeezix

February 9th, 2010
2:34 pm

I’m with you Mark – you “can’t have too much quality starting pitching” is a proven baseball axiom. What we got in return for Vasquez is a head scratcher–so it would have been better to not do the trade. Also, I remember the Alexander/Smoltz trade and I don’t recall Braves fans in tears over it. I recall it as a smart trade that helped both clubs-and Braves fans being excited about Smoltz’s potential. Maybe not at the excitement level we had last year for Tommy Hanson–but we knew more about Tommy as he was in our farm system. Alexander was clearly near the end of his road; Vasquez clearly isn’t.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
2:38 pm

Actually Truthseeker & NC, I think Diaz compares favorably to Damon. First off, you have to throw out the 24 HR thing because that’s a statistical outlyer for Damon’s career. He’s more like a 15 HR guy in a normal ballpark. But other than that, over the time that Diaz has been in the big leagues he has a higher batting avg, OBP and SLG than Damon. Plus he hits righthanded which is necessary to keep the lineup balanced. If the Braves didn’t think Heyward was ready, then signing Damon would make a lot of sense. But if you expect Heyward to make the team as the starting RF, I just don’t see adding another OF to the team to take at bats away from Diaz.

Of course, if the Braves did sign Damon now, they could see how Heyward does and if he made the club, the Braves would have the ability to trade McLouth or Melky, let the one they keep play CF, Diaz in RF and Damon in LF. Then bring Heyward along later, or see how Jordan Schafer plays at Gwinnett for a couple months.

TruthSeeker

February 9th, 2010
2:40 pm

Ramblin Wrecker, I never knocked Diaz. I think he’s outstanding. I just think Damon would give us one more good hitter and would allow us to not have to rush Heyward if we’re not convinced he’s ready for the bigs.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:40 pm

Skeezix, if you were around to remember the Alexander trade then you should remember that he was an All-star pitcher and proceeded to go 9-0 with a 1.53 ERA to propel the Tigers to the division title that season. He was not a has been, he was a 36 year old veteran traded for a 20 year old prospect. Very similar to the Javy deal. Lets hope for similar results!

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:41 pm

It’s true guys, a win on the 5th day is the same as the win from your ace…and we have the best 4th and 5th starters in the NL…

N8

February 9th, 2010
2:41 pm

It might be too much to assume coming off of surgery, that Hudson will dominate (or even last long enough to think about dominating, for that matter).

But look at the numbers in 2008. Other than the K totals, when Hudson went down, (22 starts I believe – been round and round on this topic on DOB’s blog), Hudson was every bit as dominating as Vazquez was through the same amount of starts. And he (Hudson) was doing it on a bum elbow. In his last start before shutting down for TJ surgery, Hudson pitching 6 shutout innings with 6 K’s. Then realized the pain was too much and missed a year because of it.

Would Hudson’s final 2 months of 2008, been as good as Vazquez’s was, leading to an ERA under 3.00? I don’t know, but on September 2nd, Vazquez’s ERA was 3.16. Tim Hudson’s 2008 season ended on July 23rd with a 3.17 ERA.

So, I’m not so sure why (if healthy) people aren’t sold that Tim Hudson “can’t” live up to what Vazquez did last year?

The only real issue I have with the swap of Huddy for Javy is the defense. Vazquez is a “miss the bat” pitcher, and our defense other than Escobar isn’t anything special. Switching for Javy to a guy that pitches to contact, brings the need to have solid defense behind him.

Not so sure we have that. Which is cause for concern. But not Hudson’s ability to get people out on a regular basis if he’s healthy.

After all park adjustments are calculated, Tim Hudson and Vazquez will have stats that are very similar to each other at season’s end, and Wren will have saved 2.5 million dollars along the way. 2.5 million dollars that might just go towards adding Johnny Damon to the mix.

Would it have been more ideal for Wren to save MORE money and move Lowe, while keeping both Vazquez and Hudson? Sure. You’d have to be a moron to think other wise. But he couldn’t. And due to being desperate enough to HAVE TO sign Lowe before last year, Wren is now sleeping in the bed he made.

If Hudson goes down and Vazquez pitches 200+ innings for the Stankees, then Wren will look like a fool and his gamble will have failed. But if Hudson is healthy enough to pitch around 200 innings, I’m 100 percent confident that his season will be every bit as good as Vazquez’s was last year. Or at least as good as his 2008 was before going down.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
2:41 pm

I meant to say that if they signed Damon, and Heyward didn’t make the club, they could play Damon in LF, McLouth in CF and Diaz in RF, but if he did make the club they would go LF Damon, RF Heyward and McLouth/Melky in CF (depending on who they might deal).

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
2:42 pm

Truthseeker, didn’t mean to imply you knocked Diaz.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:42 pm

So even if we only win 50% of the time thru the first two spots in the rotation, and then we win 70% from the last 3 spots, that is still a 95 win year.

Nativebird

February 9th, 2010
2:42 pm

When your Power-hitting-RBI-producing-Long-Ball-Monster-First-basement is Adam LaRoche, “The Sequel”?…it is TIME to trade some abundance in pitching to acquire it. However, Melky Cabrera isn’t exactly what we had in mind Frank. .

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:43 pm

Wrecker… no problems with Matty Baseball here! I love that guy, love his energy, love his attitude. He and Prado were the catalyst for the second half surge last year. I wish it didnt take Bobby and Frank so long to see that KJ and Frenchy were dead weight!

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
2:43 pm

The Tigers coveted Mike Dunn in the Granderson trade, but didn’t get him. I would like to flip Dunn and Melky Church to the Tigers for Wilkin Ramirez.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:44 pm

I disagree about the D…up the middle we are pretty strong…Prado is better than Kelly, and Escobar is special…McLouth won GGs in Pitt….not exactly Furcal and Andruw, but not horrible either.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
2:44 pm

Truthseeker,

Glad to see somebody else come to Kawakami’s defense. The guy was solid.

I keep telling people he pitched quite well after April, and had some dominating games especially against top tier starters. He beat Roy Halladay, Johan Santana and Dice K last season. I doubt any other pitcher in the bigs can boast a trifecta that impressive that wasn’t named Roy or Johan.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:46 pm

Additionally, this year finding a RH power bat was tougher than most….everything out there was LH.

We also got insurance for when Chipper does his annual thing…people want to dump on Huddy? How bout complaining that we paid Chipper a $hitton of $$ for 120-130 games a year. Last year being an aberration (although he should have taken off a week or two, he was absolutely dreadful in Aug)

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:46 pm

Dragonslayer-san…

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:47 pm

Nativebird- I think you can expect the same from Laroche and Glaus. Adam doesnt play for the first 80 games and Glaus might miss 80. Either way if we can get .275, 25-30 HR, 90-10 RBIs out of 1b I would be happy!

Moe the mechanic

February 9th, 2010
2:48 pm

Acquiring Melky and a POSSIBLE future major leaguer for Vazquez is like acquiring a spare tire and a case of oil for a carburetor, when your car doesn’t have a steering wheel.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:49 pm

Mark, per your Heyman article, if Hanson or Jurrjens doesn’t start opening day, I’ll be shocked. Both those guys have better stuff than JV.

That is, if Bobby doesn’t do some ceremonial thing and throw a vet out there…if this is a meritocracy, both the kids have earned it based on both last year’s finish, and what’s ahead.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
2:50 pm

NC…except we KNOW Laroche can play a good defensive first base.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
2:50 pm

I will concede this: Derek Lowe has proved he’s a big-time pitcher. I never understood why the Braves seemed to sour on him so fast. He works hard, is a great teammate, never gets hurt … and he won 15 games even in a down year.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:51 pm

Can I take some bets on how well JV is going to perform this year?

Let’s set the ERA over under at 4.20…and the win total at 13…i am going over and over…and then i am predicting he doesn’t even get to start a game in the playoffs.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
2:52 pm

I have a friend that works in the Cardinals media relations dept. and he couldn’t believe that the “big bat” that Wren signed was Troy Glaus.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:52 pm

If Adam Dunn can play 1b than Troy Glaus (who had the highest fielding % of ALL 3b in 2008) can do a decent job. Especially when you give him a whole offseason to practice. I agree that if we threw Chipper on 1b he might struggle initially but he would come around. I have faith in Troy.

Lowcountry Bulldawg

February 9th, 2010
2:53 pm

Frank Wrenn = Willie Martinez of the Braves!

What a polarizing figure!

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
2:53 pm

chuck- Of course he won’t be as good this year. He’s playing at Yankee Stadium at Williamsport and he’s facing an extra hitter in each lineup. Win totals are a farce when judging a pitcher.

TruthSeeker

February 9th, 2010
2:54 pm

chuck, you think JJ has better stuff than Vazquez? I love Jair, but Javy had some of the most disgusting stuff I’ve ever seen.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:54 pm

Jesse…why….his year in STL was great prior to the injury? I am flummoxed. Your friend drinks too much of the Budweiser.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
2:54 pm

Who says Adam Dunn can play first base?

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
2:55 pm

That was 2 years ago. Who knows how truly healthy he is? He had some Pujols guy batting around him.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:56 pm

I agree chuck. JV is a pitcher who needs comfort, thats why O.guillen called him out as not being a big game pitcher. He struggled in NY before and he will struggle again. The comfort of having B.Cox as your ever-supportive coach is a big reason why he prospered last year. Put him in the bandbox in NY and his fly-ball pitching style will yield at least a dozen more HR’s and a .500 record.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:56 pm

I think JJ thinks more on the mound…and has better control of his stuff…and pitches better to contact, so he can scheme thru a lineup a little better.

outright stuff, it’s hard to argue with JV’s year last year…i haven’t seen him throw like that consistently for the 10 years i’ve seen him….

He has a touch of the Bret Saberhagen disease, on some years, and then disappointingly off the next.

monty

February 9th, 2010
2:57 pm

No reason, even with the loss of JV, to believe we won’t have a top 4 pitching staff. The sad part (so far) of losing JV is not that we can’t slide Hudson in and that he won’t give us something similar, but that most of us believed giving up JV would mean getting a really good everyday starting OF. If losing JV means we get to sign Damon then perhaps it will have been worth it.(Melky certainly isn’t) 3-4 years from now “if” the Yankee prospect we got becomes a dominant starter then it becomes a stroke of genuise, still not sure how we are better “this year” for losing JV.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
2:58 pm

Well, if Chipper returns to form, that is a pretty nice guy in front to get him some looks, and Esco is one of the best hitters in the NL with RISP…so that’s your 3 and your 6, with Mac probably hitting 5th…not a bad bunch of guys who make regular contact. Heyward may bat 7th…Diaz 8th…

If all these guys have reasonably good years, it will be far more support than even Pujols by himself could provide.

NCbravesFAN

February 9th, 2010
2:58 pm

Adam Dunn is “allowed” to play first. Im not saying he is good at it, I was just trying to support my point by stating that even BAD fielders are acceptable at 1b.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:00 pm

IF Chipper returns to form…IF Glaus is healthy…IF Heyward proves he’s ready… He also had Ludwick hitting around him as well.

monty

February 9th, 2010
3:00 pm

The Yankees were foolish not to pursue Lowe and his groundball inducing sinker in that bandbox they play in. I agree that JV is way better suited for Atlanta than NY.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:00 pm

Monty hit the nail on the head re: the sad part of the JV trade…we all had higher hopes.

But looking at what we got, what we have left in the rotation, we really have no reason for sour grapes. We just need to exercise patience, or flip Dunn/Melky or package them into the pieces we need.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:01 pm

He’s ALLOWED to play first base for the f&^&^&ng Nationals. Is that our standard now?

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:02 pm

Ludwick is merely OK…i am skeptical of late bloomers…they don’t often sustain.

As for the ifs…every team has ifs…name me one sure thing. Our ifs at least have demonstrated high levels of success in the past.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:03 pm

I’d rather have Dunn in LF and not hold my breath every time a grounder or low throw comes to first. I watched Dunn practice playing first last year in Viera. He looked more like a goalie than a firstbaseman

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:03 pm

Again…i love Chipper…will go to the Coop when it’s his time. But when we sit here complaining about salaries and how they hamstring us from going and paying for bats, think about how much we pay him and how much we have to cross our fingers he stays healthy. And we knew that going in to the deal.

Tribute pay is a thing of the past, and I hope it’s the last time we do it.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:04 pm

Ludwick put up better numbers than Glaus that year. If Ludwick is “just OK”, what is Glaus?

JCarson10

February 9th, 2010
3:06 pm

Mark Bradley, I have a couple questions for you. 1. How in the world can the Cardinals be in the top 5 with only 4 starters as of right now? and their 4th is Brad Penny who had a decent second half last year….absurd. 2. Javier Vasquez was great for us last year but it was a “Career Year” from a guy who has a career ERA over 4! and just for the record and ERA is an AVERAGE which from my understanding is a pretty good clue as to what you can expect from a pitcher just like career batting average. 3. How are the Braves not there? I’m sorry the rotation Led the League in ERA last year and we will get a full year of Hanson and Hudson (who is head and shoulders above Vasquez in their careers) plus there is no way D Lowe doesn’t post a better ERA…this List is just disgusting IMO but what do I know right?

Will

February 9th, 2010
3:12 pm

When is the first NFL preseason game? I miss football season already.

Andrew

February 9th, 2010
3:17 pm

Debbie Downer strikes again.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:21 pm

Glaus is a RH power hitter with holes in his swing who has a way better career resume…he has experience. But invariably, when healthy, he hits 30 HR or more, and drives in close to 100 runs.

Again, from the right side, which is what this team needed.

Jared

February 9th, 2010
3:21 pm

Jesse, why would should we care about someone who works in media relations? Does that give him some kind of baseball knowledge that we don’t have? What is media relations, anyways?

As for Dunn, the Nationals 1B. I’d take him today if we made a deal and I’m sure you would, too.

Chuck, Chipper has taken less and less money over and over. He is consistently taking less money than the Braves are even willing to pay him for the good of the team. Should he just give all of it up and play for free? Would you? If the Braves offered him 8 mil a year I bet he’d probably take it.

JCarson, right on. The list is ridiculous ESPN biased propaganda. Yankees, Red Sox, Phillies… blah blah blah.

Nativebird

February 9th, 2010
3:22 pm

Pitching – smitching. We got pitching. We got enough pitching. Good Frank…good boy. Your a genius. Now, about those pesky 3.2 runs you need per game. hmmmm.

Braves Fan 84

February 9th, 2010
3:23 pm

Hi Bradley,

Can you post( link) the articles you created last year about the Braves move and your opinion? I am curious to know what you thought about Javy.

Daybed Wagmoe

February 9th, 2010
3:25 pm

A problem I have with Buster’s picks has to do with including the Cardinals in the top 5. I know that they’ve got the two Cy Young runners-up, but there’s not a 5th starter in the rotation at this point. It’d be fine to say that the front four are so good that they could slide Mark Redman or Chuck James into that 5th spot and still be one of the top 5, but he prefaced his answers by saying, “keep in mind that we’re looking at the entire rotation, spots 1-5″ (paraphrase). If that’s the case, I’d think that the Phillies’ belongs in spot 5, not 5a, that the Braves should be up there, or maybe even the Cubs.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:27 pm

Can’t wait to see all of you guys who will have “known all along” when we get a WC or win the division this year.

I’ll be disappointed with less than 92 wins. I have high expectations. The pitching is there, we have an AS Catcher, a GG CF, potential ROY, HOF 3rd baseman, and a 5 tool SS who is coming into his own…plenty of pieces by the accolades alone. I’ll go down any lineup in the NL and find holes (save for the Phils, who have less)…

monty

February 9th, 2010
3:29 pm

Jcarson10

A 4.19 ERA for an AL pitcher isn’t bad, and I would suggest it is better than avg. for that league. You usually see pitchers’s ERA’s come down significantly when traded from AL to NL and vice-versa, often times by .50 to as much a 1.00 runs per game. An AL ERA of 4.19 would be comparable to around 3.50-3.70 ERA in the NL, IMHO.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:31 pm

Heyward readiness question…interested in what your guys take is…

A) Does he need 200-300 ABs in AAA? (A nice byproduct of which will be avoiding Super2 for a year)

B) If he has a decent spring but not great, is there anyway we can send him down without looking cheap? Or it being interpreted as such.

C) If he has a great spring, we can’t avoid looking cheap if we send him down under the umbrella of additional “seasoning”…will this hurt us, and be remembered when it’s time for his agent to put the screws to us…the last thing we want is our franchise player thinking we nickel and dimed him.

I think if we send him down it sends a message that we aren’t as serious about winning as we need to be, and that we are more concerned with saving a buck. My confidence barometer really hinges on this decision more than any other.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
3:32 pm

I was underwhelmed when the Braves acquired Vazquez, I must report. But I soon became whelmed.

bullman198302

February 9th, 2010
3:33 pm

so let me get this straight the braves rotation is not elite because Mark Bradley and Buster Olney say so???? you are telling me that javier vasquez is a better pitcher than tim hudson and you guys make a living out of this???? u 2 are a joke we have the best rotation in the NL period….

jeffrey d

February 9th, 2010
3:33 pm

I agree that there’s a few question marks in our rotation. But to put a rotation that has Joe Blanton as a 3rd starter in the top 5?

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:35 pm

Jared- He saw A LOT more of Glaus than you or me. He is also privy to information that you and I are not.

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:40 pm

No…i hear you on Chipper Jared, but I would have let him explore the market and see what he was really worth, and matched that if reasonable. I might have just let him walk, considering the team was about to enter rebuilding anyway.

Less money or not, he is still only available 70% of the time. All of the injury talk for Huddy and others, and this guy gets a free pass. Even if he did hit better than ever in 2008.

Frank Maney

February 9th, 2010
3:40 pm

I’d like to appoligize to everyone. I’m the reason that for the past 5-6 years the Braves have stunk. I became a braves fan the year after the 14-15th straight East Title. (Cant remember which.) Ever since its been dissapointment one after another. I wish the braves would hold there good players. Again I appoligize for the jinx.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
3:45 pm

So I guess my question to Mark Bradley would be, if you were underwhelmed by the acquisition of Vasquez last offseason and became whelmed as you put it, isn’t there just as much a chance that you will be whelmed by the new starting rotation as you might be disappointed?

JCarson10

February 9th, 2010
3:46 pm

Monty, even if your calculations are dead on Hudson would still have a better career ERA by somewhere between 1/3 to 1/2 a run……..still my points are valid. I think I should take this guy’s job. This is the dumbest thing I have ever read. Also, I would bet money on 1. Our rotation being top 3 in NL and top 5 in ML. and 2. Wainwright and Carpenter, both not just 1, not repeating last year’s success.

lj

February 9th, 2010
3:46 pm

the vazquez trade was more dumber than the mark tex trade! A braves fan but cmon what are u guys doing? lol…we need at least 2 players hitting over 285 avg 25hruns! pitching rotation will be fine. GO BRAVES!!!!!!!! GO FALCONS!!!!!!!! GO HAWKS!!!!!!!!!

JCarson10

February 9th, 2010
3:48 pm

I am actually just going close this window because moronic sports writers just piss me off. Study the sport you write about. Get a clue. Then maybe you can write a semi-intelligent article.

Chief Knockahoma

February 9th, 2010
3:48 pm

Enter your comments here

Lew

February 9th, 2010
3:50 pm

You’re obstinately obtuse.

Chief Knockahoma

February 9th, 2010
3:51 pm

The Braves don’t have the big gun at the top but I would take our 2 thru 5 over anyone.

Todd - Dacula

February 9th, 2010
3:52 pm

Pure stupid thinking; Vasquez, although pretty good, his subtraction does not warrant that big of a loss. However, just like NCAA Foorball pre-season ranking, it means nothing for someone to guess how good a team mike be. There are so many factors to consider. Lets just wait and see… I am sure the Braves can be one of the better team-starting rotations; the bats have to come alive…

chuck

February 9th, 2010
3:53 pm

Andy: Obtuse! Is it deliberate?!

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:53 pm

I agree Chief, but our outfield has been broken for some time and it hasn’t been fixed. Melky is not even a Band-Aid on a severe laceration. He’s more like Curad adhesive bandages.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
3:53 pm

I mean, Hudson’s average year is better than Vasquez average year. So statistically that is more likely. Lowe’s average year is better than Vasquez’s. Same deal. It wasn’t like Lowe had a 6.00 ERA and lost a lot of velocity. He was good some of the time not good some of the time and apparently noticed a mechanical flaw in his delivery. To me all the factors are there for Lowe to move more towards his mean.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:55 pm

When you trade a good piece, you expect to get something in return. We got a 4th outfielder and a POSSIBLE future major leaguer. These are the trades the Pirates make.

Conyers Braves Fan

February 9th, 2010
3:56 pm

Mark: Buster may be right or wrong with his ratings. He gets paid to write these articles as he sees
the situations. I don`t care what he writes one way or another.

I do care about the Braves and how they play on the field. Our team is what it is. Maybe it will be
better sooner than later. The pitching rotation is not the main concern…..its the lack of a big
hitter that is not a retread that worries me. The stopgaps we got over the winter may not be the solution.

Ramblin Wrecker

February 9th, 2010
3:57 pm

Chief Knockahoma,

“they don’t have a big gun at the top of the rotation”

What team were you watching last year? They had two guys with sub 3.00 ERA’s and were nasty down the stretch, Jurrjens and Hanson. You telling me neither of those guys are “big guns”?

Stupid ridiculous statement.

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
3:58 pm

None of us writers knows everything, Conyers. Least of all me. But I would say I value the opinions of the people I reference. Otherwise I wouldn’t reference them.

Bob

February 9th, 2010
3:58 pm

Every GM and baseball insider have the same opinion of Wren, Wrong man for the job, makes moves based on emotions. Will turn Braves into Nationals.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
3:59 pm

Bob- He lasted one illustrious year as the Orioles GM.

tmack652

February 9th, 2010
4:01 pm

NC- you make a lot of sense on here. But be nice to Mr. Bradley!! show him some of that NC charm we love to adorn on our fellow southerners :)

Alan

February 9th, 2010
4:01 pm

Mark, we all know the Vazquez trade was a salary dump, but no one honestly can expect the Braves to admit that. In the end, it was decided to choose a reduced-salary Tim Hudson for the next 3 years over 1 guaranteed year of Javy Vazquez, with the distinct possibility of Vazquez departing via free agency after this season. The Braves obviously shopped around, and they took the best deal they could get. Everyone’s trashing Melky Cabrera, but the guy was a regular player on the World Series champions. He is not a bum, and I believe he is going to be at least a semi-regular this season — and likely a full-time player if Heyward starts the season at AAA. By all accounts, the two pitchers are very good prospects, and the word is that Mike Dunn (the lefty reliever) likely will be in the Braves’ bullpen. The kid righty, Vizcaino, has a chance to be another Jurrjens. If he is, the trade will turn out to be a great one for the Braves. As far as Buster Olney’s rankings go, he’s right about the Red Sox and the Yankees at the top, but that’s it. The Braves’ rotation is superior to all the rest. Kyle Lohse and “anybody else” for the Cardinals? Jake Peavy, Gavin Floyd and Freddie Garcia for the White Sox? Joe Blanton (at 10 million a year for 3 years, by the way) and Jamie Moyer for the Phillies? KK at the back end of the Braves’ rotation is better than all of those guys.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:03 pm

my problem is we traded 4 good prospects to get a mediocre Vasquez at the time, and now traded a #1 ace Vasquez with us for 1 good prospect………the math doesn’t add up

T Burns

February 9th, 2010
4:06 pm

Vazquez’ 2009 was the best year of his career – unlikely to duplicate it. As it stands now, 4/5ths of the time, the Braves will send a pitcher out that has a strong chance to win, no matter who they’re facing. I have great confidence in this rotation, more confidence at the beginning of the year than I’ve had in an Atlanta rotation since the breakup of the big three.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:06 pm

You didn’t include Brent Lillibridge in those “4 good prospects” we sent to the ChiSox for Vaz, did you?

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
4:12 pm

Here’s my problem with the we-have-to-dump-a-pitcher mentality, Alan: Wren acquired three of these guys in one offseason. He knew better than anyone what the payroll was going to be. Why get them if you have to turn around and say, “We can’t afford them”?

In the grand scheme, the mistake was signing Kawakami on top of trading for Vazquez and signing Lowe. That was too much to pay and too long a commitment for a guy who’d never pitched in the major leagues. I understand that Wren wanted to avoid a repeat of 2008, when he didn’t know from night to night if he’d have a healthy starter, but he overbought. He knew Tommy Hanson was close and Jair Jurrjens was really good and that Tim Hudson was in the process of rehabbing — and still he moved to import three starting pitchers AND re-sign Tom Glavine.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:12 pm

Tyler Flowers-great prospect , Brent Lillibridge- sub par = =2 good prospects (on average)

UGA math…..

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:13 pm

I think Tyler Flowers would be ready to play 1st base this year….if we still had him

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:15 pm

Yeah, Flowers could be our first baseman now and we wouldn’t be looking for a LF for what seems like our 16th straight year. Again, I wish we would’ve talked to the Tigers about Wilkin Ramirez.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:15 pm

why keep playing ourselves…..lets sell off all of our good old assets for some young talent…and get young all around.

I’m tired of all this in the middle of the pact crap

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:17 pm

I think I just saw John Shuerholtz up in some trees with some binoculars in Curacao ….must be looking for some new Andruw Jones type players

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:17 pm

Alan, the only reason Melky was a regular on the Yankees is because they didn’t need a CF with a bat. We are in dire need of a bat.

Lew

February 9th, 2010
4:17 pm

jesse stone-Yeah and Leo lasted how long in Baltimore? Thing is that Angelos is crazy as all hell and no one is safe working for him. I wouldn’t read anything into Wren’s lasting a year.

Hell, if nothing else, he should be praised for getting Jurrjens (and by extension McLouth for Hernandez, who he got in the JJ deal) for Renteria (never had another good year, much less AS good in Atlanta) and his also picked up Infante and Ohman for someone nobody even remembers anymore. He brought in the players to improve our 09 record by what? about 14 games and totally revamped our pitching rotation (thereby even giving us a Javy Vazquez to trade for salary relief)?

Yeah, Dude needs to be fired because he couldn’t get a big enough deal for a player with a single year left on his contract, that had a career year when every single GM realized it was just that -a career year- and had never followed up a successful year in a 12 year career with another great season. Time to face facts-Javy (and I wanted to keep him and NOT re-sign Hudson) just wasn’t worth nearly what everyone thought he was. Market conditions and NOT Frank Wren, IMO, unless you;’re delusional enough to truly believe FW turned won a better deal?

Mark Bradley

February 9th, 2010
4:19 pm

I’m not sure Tyler Flowers is ready for the majors just yet. He came up to the bigs for the White Sox in September last season, but their plan is to give him another minor-league season.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:20 pm

Lew- what team is Leo working for now? He also had Garret Anderson in our outfield. He was also EXTREMELY lucky that Furcal didn’t take the 10M he offered him and Peavy didn’t want to come to Atlanta, which would’ve cost us Yunel. He hasn’t fixed our most glaring need, an outfield bat.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:20 pm

I want John Smoltz back….he can still pitch I tell ya….he performs better in an Atlanta uniform…see track record

Age is never a problem with smoltz

Lew

February 9th, 2010
4:21 pm

Opinion-And what old talent would you trade away? Chipper, who can’t BE traded without his approval? or McCann, who just won his third Silver Slugger award in four years? Everyone else we have who is old enough to qualify either just came to the Braves (Saito and Wagner) or was untradeable like Lowe. So who you got in mind?

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:22 pm

anyone who wants to get rid of Yunel Escobar at $500,000 a year for a $15 million dollar man is the biggest idiot in the world…..period.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:23 pm

well for one thing Lew, 26 yr old McCann is not an old player…..I have nothing to say to you if you believe that.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
4:25 pm

Greg Norton would of been a good old player to get rid of last year……we see how that worked out.

could’a gotten at least some Big League Chew for him i think

Deriter

February 9th, 2010
4:28 pm

Unfortunately, Bradley is right on this one. The Braves can’t be winners when they deal away their best pitcher and then sign position players & pitchers who are in the midst of rehabilitation. If you ain’t the lead dog, the scenery never changes. In this case, the Braves will be looking at the behinds of the Phillies & Mets and maybe the Marlins as well.

Lew

February 9th, 2010
4:32 pm

jesse stone-How in hell can you judge someone on deals that DIDN’T happen? Did he give up Yunel for Peavy? Didn’t FW call the deal off when they asked for too much? Isn’t that what you wanted? You’re going to hammer the Dude because he did what you would have? Conflicted are we?

The Furcal thing might have worked but didn’t happen either, so anything you choose to pound into the ground on THAT deal is nothing but rank speculation as it never happened. Maybe you can assess a negative, but then the rest of us are merely human, apparently unlike you.

As for Garrett Anderson-who would YOU have picked up for $2.5 million? And as far as GA’s peformance went, he wasn’t ever going to tear up the league defensively and the Dude hit .260 with 13 HR and 61 RBI – a season that was well worth what they paid for him, even if not up to YOUR expectations.

Time to face facts-you can put superstars at every position if you have the payroll the Yankees and Red Sox have- We don’t. You go with the best you can afford (and our payroll isn’t nearly as shabby at $95 mil as some seem to think-nice to spend someone else’s millions, ain’t it?) and that’s exactly what Wren did. He may not be perfect, but then again, no one is except y’all amateur GM’s here in cyberspace.

Lew

February 9th, 2010
4:36 pm

OPinion-The point was there ARE no other older players. With the exception of those we just signed, we had a young team with Yunel, McCann, Prado, Diaz and McLouth. There aren’t any old players with large salaries TO trade, except Chipper, who as mentioned cant be traded and Lowe who they couldn’t trade. ou make a moot point. I repeat, who would you trade? Did I forget someone?

Lew

February 9th, 2010
4:37 pm

Yeah-Other teams were just lining up to trade us a bag of dirty socks for Greg Norton and his sub .200 BA. Whatever.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:39 pm

Lew- It was Kevin Towers and Jake Peavy that killed the deal. If it were up to Wren, Yunel would be a Padre and Fookie would’ve been the Braves biggest FA flop. Like I said, he was lucky.
Anderson was a liability defensively and on the bases. Most MLB outfielders given the number of ABs that Loaf had would’ve put up at least those same offensive numbers and undoubtedly would have beenbetter on defense.
Lew, are you saying that you will NEVER criticize anyone here on these blogs, because nobody’s perfect?

Alan

February 9th, 2010
4:39 pm

Mark, I agree with your 4:12 post, which criticizes the Braves for signing Kawakami after they had signed Lowe and traded for Vazquez. That added $7 million+ per year for 3 years for what amounts to their 5th starter. Way too extravagant. But earlier, you said that you didn’t have a problem with Frank Wren’s moves last offseason when it reality you did. And still do. Because it could be argued that, if the Braves did NOT sign KK last year, they would not have felt compelled to dump salary this offseason. Now, let me go back to Melky. Jesse Stone (4:17) wrote that the Yankees played Melky because they didn’t need his offense. Really? His offense wasn’t bad, you know. Not much power, I admit, but the guy was hardly an automatic out. He delivered some clutch hits, he always hustled, and he played solid defense. The projected outfield this year of Diaz/Cabrera, McLouth and Heyward is vastly superior — offense and defense — than last year’s opening-day outfield of Anderson, Schafer and Francouer.

Gary

February 9th, 2010
4:41 pm

I agree that losing Vasquez is tough, and wished we could have got more for him. But I also recognize tht it was the most logical thing to do consideing the strength of the starting rotation. I don’t agree with those that say Hudson and Lowe are bottom of the rotation pitchers and I think too many forget about some of the memorable gems KK pitched as well. I think with a year to adapt to NL hitters, KK will be more consistent, with a lot more quality starts. This could be a great year for Atlanta’s starters. I’m much more worried about the aging closers and the lack of a big bat than I am about starting pitching. I think short of a rash of injuries, Braves fans will be very pleased with this pitching staff next October when we finally return to the playoffs.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:41 pm

The deal, I believe was Gorkys, Escobar, and a pitcher. And that was Wren’s offer.

bvillebaron

February 9th, 2010
4:41 pm

Mark and Others:

The fact that Buster Olney rates the Phillies rotation higher than Atlanta while projecting J.A. Happ and Jamie Moyer as their No. 4 and 5 starters, not to mention Joe Blanton as No. 3, should tell you all you need to know about his analysis. Are you kidding me or what, Buster?

For all of you Hudson detractors, particularly those who claim he hasn’t been “lights out” since arriving in Atlanta, here are some comparisons between him and Vazquez from 2005 through 2009 (i.e. the time Hudson has been in Atlanta) just for the record.

Hudson

2005 14-9 W/L 192 IP 3.52 ERA
2006 13-12 W/L 218.1 IP 4.86 ERA
2007 16-10 W/L 224.1 IP 3.33 ERA
2008 11-7 W/L 142.0 IP 3.17 ERA
2009 2-1 W/L 42.1 IP 3.61 ERA

Totals 56-39 819 IP 3.76 ERA

Vazquez:

2005 11-15 W/L 215.2 IP 4.42 ERA
2006 11-12 W/L 202.2 IP 4.84 ERA
2007 15-8 W/L 216.2 IP 3.74 ERA
2008 12-16 W/L 208.1 IP 4.67 ERA
2009 15-10 W/L 219.1 IP 2.87 ERA

Totals 64-61 W/L 1062.2 IP 4.09 ERA

If you take out 2006 when Huddy still won 13 games, his totals during that time period look like this:

43-27 W/L 601 IP 3.37 ERA

If you take out Vazquez’s career year last year (and it ain’t even close folks that this was his best year ever), his totals during that time period look like this:

49-51 W/L 843.1 IP 4.41 ERA

While I realize that statistics don’t always tell the whole story, the fact is that there is nothing in Vazquez’s history that even remotely suggests he would have the type of season this year that he did last year (he also ain’t the second coming of John Smoltz or Greg Maddux either folks).

I guess I don’t know squat about baseball, but I think maybe Buster Olney ought to like you know do a little homework before he writes his article.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:43 pm

Alan, he is what he is. A .270 hitter with very little power outside the Yankee bandbox that plays slightly better than average defense. He is Timo Perez.

n

February 9th, 2010
4:46 pm

Fans never like trades for prospects/young guys because you can’t back it up with stats and thats what the trade was. Now if Dunn is decent and the young pitcher is good then its a steal for only giving up one year of Vasquez.

Lew

February 9th, 2010
4:47 pm

jesse stone-No, but if I’m going to criticize a person for something, maybe having a logical, rational basis for the criticism, that is rooted in fact might be the first thing I mention. You criticized the Dude for NOT making certain deals which you didn’t like, based on rumors you heard (unless you were actually privy to the negotiations) and that is senseless. I prefer to concentrate on the deals he DID make (which I mentioned like JJ, Ohman and Infante) that I happen to believe were pretty damned good.

emorton

February 9th, 2010
4:47 pm

I know everyone doesn’t think Wren made the right move but if you look at Tim’s career numbers is ave. about 13 1/2 wins per season. I know it’s not the 15 we had with Javy but that’s pretty close. Also, everyone seems to have forgotten what we got for Javy. The Braves have a starter for the 2011 season which I keep hearing as his projected time table to the majors. Also, we get Tommy Hansen for a complete season and Jar was more then impressive last season. I say look at what we have because it’s not to bad. I would say it is much better then last season.

J.W.

February 9th, 2010
4:50 pm

There is really only so much ranking and talking you guys can do until we just have to the play the freakin’ games to see.

Ranking by the way are so oversimplified because they cannot take into account human factors. Maybe a pitcher for the Yankees will feel less pressure to perform than one that might have pitched for the run thirsty Braves of ‘09…

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:51 pm

Lew, those were trades that Wren offered. If it were up to him, they’d be made. Most baseball fans without their heads in the sand know about the Peavy, kevin Towers thing. Everybody knows Fookie refused our 10M per offer to return to LA. Wren was lucky in those 2 instances. The JJ trade was great, but nothing else is anything to brag about.

n

February 9th, 2010
4:51 pm

The Rotation is no doubt much better going into this season then last (1-5 starters). No you say? Look who your #5 guy was last season. Look how you projected Vasquez versus how you are projecting Hudson this year (a wash).

KennyP

February 9th, 2010
4:53 pm

Everyday is worse than the one before in your world, isnt it?

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:53 pm

He!!, we boycotted an agent because Fookie wouldn’t steal our money.

Alan

February 9th, 2010
4:53 pm

Jesse, I’m not going to argue with you, so I’ll close by saying I think you’re selling Melky short. Brett Gardner is more like Timo Perez, and he couldn’t beat out Melky last year. And, by the way, unless they relent and re-sign Johnny Damon (which won’t surprise me at all), the defending WS champions will have Randy Winn or “Timo” Gardner in their starting outfield this year.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:54 pm

Our rotation going into this year is better than that entering 2009 because of Hanson, not Hudson.

Bring Me the Head of Deforest Kelley

February 9th, 2010
4:54 pm

People who are looking back over Lowe’s career statistcs and expect him to “bounce back” in 2010 are in for a wakeup call. The guy pitched his best year with the Braves last year. Its not like he’s coming back from an injury last year, or a youngster who still his more command to gain. He is a junkball pitcher who continues to lose another couple mph off his fastball every year.

And yet, the Braves’ problem is not their rotation. This is still their best component top-to-bottom and comparitively against the rest of the division. Where the Braves invested their time and money this winter was to tear down their better-than-average bullpen of 2009, while doing nothing to improve their offense.

This team finishes no higher than third in the division standings, and probably a lot closer to the bottom than the top. I’ve never been more disappointed so close to the beginning of spring training.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:56 pm

Alan, Brett Gardner DID beat out Melky entering the season. Melky only got the job back because Gardner faltered.

not to nitpick, but...

February 9th, 2010
4:56 pm

what’s the deal with Buster’s numbering convention? 1, 2, 3, 4, 5… 5a? I see this more and more these days – but how does it make sense? If he’s basically saying the fifth spot is a wash between two franchises, shouldn’t it be 1, 2, 3, 4, 5a, 5b? (and then continuing with 7, 8, 9a, 9b, 11, 12, and so on?)

SAMHERE

February 9th, 2010
4:56 pm

Wren on Sept. 17 1999 ordered the Oriles team plane to take off without superstar third baseman Cal Ripken, even though Ripken phoned ahead to say he was delayed in traffic.

That says it all about Wren. The Braves need to get rid of him.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
4:58 pm

I just saw Deforest Kelly yesterday on the old show “M Squad”.

Fed Up With Wren (Again)

February 9th, 2010
5:00 pm

Bad move after bad move. Sign Tim Hudson and create a glut of starting pitchers. What to do, what to do? I know, let’s get a big bat who can play every day in exchange for a starting pitcher (preferably not my best one). No, you say? How about a fourth outfielder and a very young prospect for your best starter last year? Well, I need an every day big bat, but OK, that sounds great! Only cuz I can take a huge flier on a beat up, has been, older third baseman who I am going to make play a position he has never played before. Why, you say? Because he is cheap, my bosses are cheap, and I’m not that smart.

I don’t care about anyone who says it’s not Wren’s fault because he is on a budget. The Marlins and Rays are on way smaller budgets than the Braves and both teams have had better success in recent years. Being on a budget means being smarter about using your resources, not dumber.

willie

February 9th, 2010
5:05 pm

I agree….they should have kept Vasquez unless they were freeing up money for a bigtime hitter, which they clearly were not.

n

February 9th, 2010
5:07 pm

Why keep Vasquez. So you either put KK in the bullpen or Lowe. Doesn’t make sense when you have a player in a contract year and at his peak value and you can get some quality players and free up money to use now or at the trade deadline. THIS TEAM IS SO MUCH BETTER THEN A YEAR AGO, LAST YEAR AT THIS TIME WE WERE REBUILDING, NOW A CONTENDER.

bvillebaron

February 9th, 2010
5:09 pm

Mark:

You concede that Lowe has proven that he is a big-time pitcher and don’t understand why the Braves soured on him, yet you have this trepidation about Hudson who, prior to his surgery, was at least Lowe’s equal both in numbers and durability.

Frances

February 9th, 2010
5:13 pm

Several of you folks would fail basic 1st grade grammar, spelling and punctuation.

Bobby P

February 9th, 2010
5:17 pm

makes for two idiots

Fed Up With Wren (Again)

February 9th, 2010
5:17 pm

n, you are either drunk or high (or both). In no way is this team better than the team at the end of last year. Starting pitching, worse. Wren plugged in a question mark in Hudson in place of the absolutely no doubt best pitcher on the staff last year. Bullpen, worse. Wagner and the Japanese dude versus Soriano and Gonzalez. And Peter Moylan’s arm is going to absolutely fall off if Bobby uses him as much as he did last year. First base, worse. Troy Glaus vs. LaRoche, no contest, I’ll take Laroche every day and twice on Sundays. And nowhere was any position upgraded. Oh, wait, I forgot, I would take Hinske over Greg Norton. THAT WAS HUGE. Every other position, same. So, how is this team a contender? You become a contender by making your team better, not worse. The bottom line is that money drives this team and its decision making, not winning.

ugaaccountant

February 9th, 2010
5:19 pm

n – For what are we contending? I know it’s not the NL east.

bruce

February 9th, 2010
5:20 pm

Lew

February 9th, 2010
5:20 pm

jesse stone-And you know these deals were proposed how? You’re really one of FW’s assistants hoping to get him fired so you can move up and take his place?

I repeat-you don’t know a damned thing about those trades that didn’t happen-you THINK you do because of rumors you heard or saw in print. If you were not privy to the phone calls or negotiations, Dude, you don’t know jack.

And maybe you’d better go back and check the history before you make statements. Wren called off the whole thing because Towers kept asking for more. I’ll guarantee you that Towers WISHES he were able to make that deal for Yunel cause he didn’t get anything close to it from the White Sox. He tried to hijack the Braves and Wren wouldn’t let him. Who Towers really wanted (if you believe the rumors) was Tommy Hanson and FW wouldn’t do the deal.

You may not realize it, but you’re so far out in left field on this whole thing that Juan Pierre couldn’t hit the cutoff man from where you’re standing.

n

February 9th, 2010
5:20 pm

Fed Up: I am not drunk or high, read what I said. I said better then this time LAST YEAR. Not end of Last year. I think the bullpen will be better this year. It sure seems a lot deeper on paper. A year ago outside of 2 or 3 guys there were a lot of questions. They were already a contender at the end of last year, didnt need improvement if you look at the numbers. Year over year they have improved drastically.

bruce

February 9th, 2010
5:22 pm

abbreviation for obstinately obtuse… never used those two words together before… thanks for the thought, but sorry I can’t call you that on this one, even if Lew did.

Busther OHLNEY

February 9th, 2010
5:22 pm

I would expect nothing less from the Yankees and Red Sox personal network. Each of those rotations have some pretty serious question marks in them. Atlanta’s rotation stacks up decently with them. I don’t think Atlanta has a true number one but they didn’t even with Javier Vazquez. I predict that Vazquez comes back to the earth after his short stint back in the NL.The AL is much more difficult to pitch against. I don’t think Javier will fall flat of his face but I don’t think he will do what he did last season in Atlanta.

ugh

February 9th, 2010
5:23 pm

Mark Bradley continues to be an embarrassment to Sports Journalism.

bvillebaron

February 9th, 2010
5:29 pm

Fed Up:

Actually since you had to resort to name calling, I think you are the one who is drunk or high. See my earlier comments re Hudson/Vazquez comparison (sorry to like bore you man with FACTS). Wagner is like only #6 on the lifetime saves list and Saito (that’s his name) was a dominant closer a few years ago for the Dodgers and pitched well for BOSTON last year. Health issues aside (and Gonzo has already has had his own TJ surgery at a much younger age–I guess he can make a successful recovery from TJ, but Hudson and Wagner who both pitched healthy and well last September can’t-and Soriano has missed a substantial amount of time with Atlanta during his time there due to his own arm injuries, except of course for last year when he knew he would be free agent this year), anyone who wouldn’t take a healthy Wagner/Saito combo over Gonzo/Soriano probably is what you accused n of being.

I will concede the LaRoche argument except for a couple of things which are they wanted a RIGHT HANDED bat, not another left handed one, and wanted someone to play 1st for only one season. When the Braves signed Glaus, LaRoche was looking for a two or more year contract (I realize that he eventually signed a one year deal, but hindsight is always 20/20).

Steve

February 9th, 2010
5:32 pm

Some of you are killing me when it comes to dissing Hudson.

Let’s put this in persepective. Most of you are saying Hudson has been an absolute bust in Atlanta, while everyone agrees that Vazquez just put together by far the best season of his career. I will just compare Hhudson’s 2008 year (injury-plagued, but he started 22 games) versus the ridiculous year Vazquez just had.

Hudson 2008 – 3.17 ERA, 1.162 WHIP, 11 wins, 141 innings in 22 starts for an average of 6.4 innings per start

Vazquez 2009 – 2.87 ERA, 1.026 WHIP, 15 wins, 219 innings in 32 startsfor an average of 8.8 innings per start

So basically, Huddies numbers in an injury plagued season are only slightly worse than Vazquez’s career year. Not only that, Vazquez only lasted roughly one out longer than Hudson in his starts.

If you compare the 3 year stats, Hudson is actually BETTER than Vazquez… even IF you factor in the league ERA and WHIP differentials of the AL for Vazquez. Let’s remember, those three years are the ones all of you are whining and moaning about where Hudson ‘under-achieved’ in Atlanta. most of you have memories equivalent to a goldfish it appears. In 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2008 Vazquez had ERA’s closer to 5.00 than they were to 4.00. That’s right, 4 of the previous 5 years Vazquez had ERA’s in the mid to high 4’s. Everyone is bashing on Hudson, but his number absolutely DOMINATED Vazquez until this one flahs in the pan year.

GET OFF THE BANDWAGON PEOPLE!!

On top of that, Vazquez was only going to be a Brave for one more year. Unless he completely stinks beyond reason this year, he is going to ask for 15 million plus and at least a 4 year deal in free agency (that’s the same as Lowe, and my guess is he will actually go much higher).

The Braves just got a BETTER pitcher for long-term, at probably 60% of what Vazquez is going to get.

Is Hudson’s arm a question mark? You bet it is. That being said, that question mark is no bigger than the question mark surrounding Vazquez and his ability to repeat his stats from 2009 considering. Vazquez is a whopping one year younger than Hudson, and it’s not likely that his breakthrough year represents a major turning point from which his career will just continue to get better.

My bet is by the end of the year, Atlanta fans will be loving the fact they have Hudson (who loves the Braves) instead of Vazquez who would have bolted immediately after the season.

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
5:35 pm

I think MLB needs another lockout…..$30m/yr for A-ROID just ridiculous

no wonder it costs all the ticket prices are ridiculous at Yankee Stadium

one more thing……$2 beer nights would be a big help to fill our empty stadium…Frankie

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
5:41 pm

Braves will be good this year

md

February 9th, 2010
5:45 pm

Mike Minor shouldn’t be too far away if someone has a bad start. He did his minor time in college, so I wouldn’t count him out. If he has a good spring, who knows.

bravesfanbob

February 9th, 2010
5:52 pm

Does anyone remember we got Arodys Vizcaino in this trade? This may or may not be the Doyle Alexander for a minor leaguer with a lifetime minor league ERA of over 5.00. (That player was John Smoltz) It may turn out to be that. You people who are so sure this was the worst trade ever probably don’t even know who I’m talking about. This trade allowed us to get Tim Hudson, (yes I know he was already signed, but does anyone believe we were going into the season with 6 starters), Troy Glaus, and will still leave us a little money to sign one more free agent, possibly Damon or Dye. Vasquez will no doubt have an ERA of over 4.00 this year. Last year was the best year of his career, and he will not duplicate it this year. When Arodys Vizcaino reaches the majors, there are many of you who will change your mind.

Adam

February 9th, 2010
5:54 pm

I don’t understand why they didn’t tell Hudson he was going to be their closer and leave the other five guys starters. Wouldn’t have had to trade a starter “just because” and they would have had a closer for the next 3-4 years.

Steve

February 9th, 2010
5:56 pm

Dang. Should have gone to page 3 before I posted. Bville must be my twin in logic.

I apologize to all for my post mirroring his. Bville, I don’t think I have ever agreed with someone on these boards any more than I am agreeing with you on this.

Oh, as for Buster Olney, his ranking the Cardinals in the top 5 speaks out about his baseball ability. Two studs and a host of nothing. Maybe they should go by ‘Carp, Wain, and pray for Rain’.

MiamiBrave

February 9th, 2010
6:01 pm

Don’t forget that we traded Tyler Flowers (a can’t miss power hitting catcher/first baseman) for essentially a one year rental of Vazquez and Melky Cabrera. Vizcaino is still a question mark, so who knows. Flowers should have been our starting first baseman this year. The kid is absolutely crushing the ball. When it’s all said and done, the Flowers trade and the subsequent Vazquez trade might come back to be as bad as the Teixeira trade was a couple years ago.

The question remains would you rather have a $11.5 million Vazquez in your rotation this year or a $9 million Hudson? The Hudson signing forced the Vazquez trade. It made absolutely no sense at all. In fact, the combination of Hudson and Cabrera actually increased payroll $500,000 over Vazquez’s contract. Personally, I’d rather have Vazquez and a $400,000 rookie outfielder. If you can’t afford to pay your number 1 starter $11.5 million, why are we paying our number 4 starter (Hudson) $9 million and a 4th outfielder (Cabrera) $3 million? It’s an extremely poor allocation of limited financial resources.

hal

February 9th, 2010
6:09 pm

i rember all the hyperbole last year when smoltzy left and same thing this year over vasquez ill post agin in august when haviers era’s in the 7’s and hes given up 40 hr in that band box and ask you all how ya like mr wrens trade then of course your all atlantas and so know nothing about baseball or you might actually gone too a few of thos playoff games in the unimpotant 14 straight lol

Jeff Walker

February 9th, 2010
6:09 pm

Chuck is easily the most sensible writer on here. The AJC should fire bradley and hire chuck. It’s funny that a former 20-game winner gets no respect b/c he had tj surgery 1 time, but a guy has 1 great year in an otherwise mediocre career and everyone gives him unlimited credibility/praise (not saying Vasquez ins’t good). Hudson is one motivated guy right now b/c of all these doubters, and I like him to have a really good year b/c he has a chip on his shoulder. The guy is a training freak so he will be doing everything possible to be healthy. Also, Vasquez has the 1 great season, and people forget his average past, Lowe has 1 poor season (still won 15 games) and people forget his above average career

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
6:20 pm

Lew, you are going to believe what you believe. Everybody that knows baseball and doesn’t have an axe to grind KNOWS that Wren offered Furcal 10M and Furcal turned it down to stay with the Dodgers. You can refuse to believe it and call it a “rumor” all you want, but most know it’s true.
There are numerous stories about the failed Peavy trade (I guess they’re all false, huh?) from the mlb.com archives and elsewhere. Peavy did not want to come to Atlanta. In ANY scenario, Yunel would be a part of that trade. But again, Lew you can pretend it didn’t happen.
And your last attempted “dig” at me made no sense. “You are so far out in left field, Juan Pierre couldn’t hit the cutoff man from where you’re standing”. Juan Pierre has an incredibly weak arm. You should have used a strong armed outfielder in your lame attempta t whatever it is you were attempting. An average attempt from you Lew, but it’s a swing and a miss.

Skeezix

February 9th, 2010
6:27 pm

Mark: Your 4:12 post is exactly on target—that is why I don’t cut Wren any slack for the budget he is working under. He caused the problem by overspending on pitchers like Lowe and KK. The only good move since Oct 2009, is getting rid of Norton…but that move was 3 months too late.

TennesseePaul

February 9th, 2010
6:33 pm

Ah but the Braves have Jurrjens, Hanson, Teheran, and Vizcaino…

oh wait, you were talking about 2010…

athensmatt

February 9th, 2010
6:51 pm

mark bradley: a writer who would point out the braves lost 62 games before stating they won 100.

i’d say a rotation with jair jurrjens, tommy hanson, and tim hudson is pretty darn good. besides, javy vasquez only has a good season every other year. no way he has an e.r.a. under 4.50 for the yanks in 2010.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
6:55 pm

Lew- Since it’s just “rumor”, do you also believe Tiger Woods has been a faithful husband?

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
6:56 pm

athensmatt- the point is, we should be able to get something better than Melky freakin’ Cabrera and a POSSIBLE future major league pitcher for javy.

Josh in Ohio

February 9th, 2010
6:57 pm

I have to respectfully disagree with you, Mark. IMO the Braves have the third best rotation in baseball. The Red Sox have the best rotation hands down. The Yankees #2, Braves #3, Cards #4, Angels #5, Phillies #6. The Braves match up quite well with the CWS, LAA, STL, & PHI. Lets match the Braves staff against the Phils b/c they’re in our division.

#1 JJ vs Halladay: Halladay is the best in game.
#2 Hanson vs Hamels: Slight edge Hanson.
#3 Hudson vs Blanton: Huddy
#4 Lowe vs Happ: Lowe
#5 KK vs Moyer: KK in a walk over.

Braves win 4 of the 5 matchups with the Phils. I admit I am biased, but honestly how is the Phillies staff better than ours? or Chicago’s or Anaheim’s? You can make a solid argument that St. Louis’ staff is better b/c Carpenter and Wainwright are better than any two we can put at the top of the rotation. However, our 3,4, & 5 our better than theirs.

Somebody point out where and how I’m wrong, I’m willing to listen.

"Chef" Tim Dix

February 9th, 2010
7:14 pm

Tommy Hanson wins 20 + and will be feared.

jim

February 9th, 2010
7:19 pm

“Buster mentions San Fran and Tampa Bay in the same category as the Braves”

Well a rotation headed by Lincecum, Cain, and Baumgarner with Zito at # 4 is certainly better than the White Sox and probably the Cards, and Tampa Bay’s rotation from 1 – 5 is also pretty impressive if Price lives up to expectations, and they have depth in the high minors. All three of these rotations should probably surplant the Chicago rotation for starters.

TROTTINGHOME

February 9th, 2010
7:38 pm

Mark’s 4:12 post is a very good example of why
Wren is the GM and Bradley is a spectulating lawyer that had to get a job writing about…sports.

Here’s my problem…to many boobs thinking they can write more than one article a day without plagiarizing or worse cutting and pasting…oops…did I just falsly accuse someone of an illegal act?

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
7:48 pm

everybody chill out on Bradley, the guy is just giving us hungry fans articles to read and digest….he’s doin his job, I prefer to read it from Bradley than anyone who doesn’t fallow the Braves

Opinion

February 9th, 2010
7:48 pm

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Bradley, ReidAdair. ReidAdair said: RT @MarkBradleyAJC: ESPN's Buster Olney isn't sold on the Atlanta Braves' rotation sans Javier Vazquez. Neither am I. http://bit.ly/9jVyBL [...]

athensmatt

February 9th, 2010
7:57 pm

jesse stone: even though i don’t think javy will do very well in new york this year, that doesn’t mean i think it was a good trade. i didn’t say anything favoring the trade wren made. i agree with you 100%, i think it was a terrible return for a guy who had an extremely high value.

athensmatt

February 9th, 2010
7:59 pm

amen, trottinghome.

Hank44

February 9th, 2010
8:09 pm

Hey Mark, no matter what some of these knuckleheads say about you and your articles, I still enjoy your insight and opinions and appreciate the opportunity to express our own thoughts towards the Braves. As is every season – it’s a wait and see how all the trades/moves make a GM smarter.

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Bradley, Nick Stekovic, Bill Penny, Jake Walker, Candice Nicholson and others. Candice Nicholson said: Bradley's Buzz: ESPN's Buster doesn't love Braves' rotation: Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) I haven't quite b… http://bit.ly/aWPU3B [...]

Lew

February 9th, 2010
8:43 pm

jesse stone-Do I believe the rumor that Tiger had affairs? Probably much more than I believe the rumors that you have a freaking clue.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
8:52 pm

Are you still going to argue that Wren didn’t offer Furcal a contract? How about Peavy putting an end to his trade to Atlanta? Keep drinking the Frank Wren Kool-Aid

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
8:53 pm

oh, you never did tell me which organization scooped up Mazzone after the Orioles canned him.

Lew

February 9th, 2010
9:01 pm

Dude-Do you even bother to read? I was talking the Peavy deal (DUH, Kevin Towers?). Furcal might or might not have worked out. I have no idea and neither do you as it never happened. All you can say is you didn’t like the idea. But as far as who or what was offered for Peavy, you have NO IDEA what went on in negotiations unless you were part of them.

And as for the Juan Pierre comment. Again, DUH. I know he has a weak arm that was the —oh WTF, you can’t explain much to a person with the reasoning power of a rutabaga.

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
9:10 pm

The Pierre comment made no sense. You can defend Wren to your dying breath if you choose, but he tried to make a trade that, if completed would’ve been a bust. If you were the Braves owner, Wren would have a contract similar to Paul Hewitt’s.

Lew

February 9th, 2010
9:20 pm

Jesse Stone

February 9th, 2010
9:22 pm

so….that’s how low you’ve stooped now? Impressive

tlj

February 9th, 2010
9:23 pm

Mark,

Let’s be fair about this, Javier had a career year and probably was not going to duplicate it. As a Brave he would have won 12 to 14 games with a 4.00 plus ERA this year. Hudson will probably not duplicate his previous years but should be counted upon for 12 to 14 wins with a 4.00 ERA. In other words it is a wash.

Javier’s contract was scheduled to be up at the end of this year, Hudson will have 2 additional years. We obtained a very good prospect, a 4 th outfielder (possibly a starter, I think Cabera will do okay in the NL) and a lefty relief pitcher.

Last year when we traded for Javier I remember everyone calling it a bad trade. We gave up a very good prospect for a 500 pitcher who couldn’t win the big game. Now all of a sudden this same pitcher is Cy Young. Come on give me a break.

This staff is no worse than the one that finished 2009.

athensmatt

February 9th, 2010
9:28 pm

“We gave up a very good prospect for a 500 pitcher who couldn’t win the big game. Now all of a sudden this same pitcher is Cy Young.”

well said. i was just wondering what ol’ bradley was thinking this time last year when the braves picked up vasquez.

Craig

February 9th, 2010
9:36 pm

What Vazquez or no Vazquez our rotation is one of the games best!far better than the philies!the guy who said that is as dumb as a chicken with no head!

Mike

February 9th, 2010
9:54 pm

All of you need to wake up! Javy has never had a season like the one he had last year. The Braves sold high. Hudson, who is only 1 year older than Javy, is NOT injury prone, he had one surgery. Hudson has had better career numbers than Javy. Wren tried everything he could to dump Lowe which was the right move. He just couldn’t. NO ONE would take Lowe. You never let a guy like Hudson walk when you can get him for 9 mill a year. We had Javy for one more year and no guarantee that he would resign with us. We are not the Yankees people. We have a budget to consider. Do I wish we could have gotten more for Javy? Yes I do, but we wont know how good the trade was until the young guy comes around. When Javy returns to his normal career numbers next year and Huddy comes back and pitches like he did before the surgery (or better – he has said that he may have been dealing with an issue for years and not realizing it) then you Mark, and you Buster Olney, and anyone else can eat some crow.

rmf

February 9th, 2010
9:58 pm

I agree with Mark’s earlier comment that Wren’s first mistake here was the signing of KK. It was too big a contract for 5th pitcher who cannot now be traded. It was great to get him, but he is luxury and this team can no longer afford luxuries.

But in looking at this whole thing, largely with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, I think Wren has made several other miscalculations.

I think he first gave Hudson too much money. Does anyone think Hudson could have gotten this deal in this market without either the Yanks or Boston. I know some of you will say the Mets would have gone after him, but they have been pretty timid this offseason. Even so, would even they have given him this number of years. I like Tim and I hope he succeeds, but this is a big gamble for a team like the Braves.

I also think that when he signed Hudson, he thought could find a trading partner for Lowe who would eat a good portion of the contract. I don’t care what anyones says, it seemed pretty clear at the time that the preference was to trade Lowe. We all saw how that worked out.

When he finally got to the point of offering Vazquez, he had little negotiating leverage to get a big established bat The prospect is great, but the point was to win this year.

Despite all of this, we still have a pretty good rotation with two great young pitchers and a lot of young pitching talent on the way up. If Hudson reverts to form with his new arm, it could be a great one.

One thing about Frank is that he sure does give us a lot to talk about.

GovClintonTyree

February 9th, 2010
10:10 pm

The only problem, as Bradley alluded to at 4:06, is the return in the Vazquez deal. It needed to be a young power hitting OF. The Yanks could have kept Melky and Vizcaino and Dunn and sent us Swisher and Frank would still be hitting close to 1.000 with me.

Nothing wrong with clearing salary, nothing wrong with choosing to sign Hudson, had another group of really good signings (Glaus, Hinske, Saito, Wagner). In particular, I think the Hinske move is a master stroke.

Nothing wrong with shopping the hell out of Lowe and getting no takers and opting to move Vazquez. Not happy with the return on the deal, and not happy with the payroll shell game to justify not spending the savings on a real LF (and yes, Damon would be fine with me, at this point).

But only a northeast-biased ESPN reporter – and apparently one local guy who moves from sport to sport – could survey all MLB rotations and not have the Braves in the top five. Some of the rotations he put ahead of the Braves were just silly, even without Vazquez.

willy

February 10th, 2010
12:53 am

to those of you who dont know. We took melky to get him off the Yankees payroll and vizcaino’s stock has been plummeting. This is another FW stoopid move. with the uncertainties of Lowe and KK to trade youe ace is moronic. they would have been better off eating 10 million a yr of lowe’s salary but that would make FW look like the idiot he is.

MitchC

February 10th, 2010
5:57 am

Mark, while I don’t take Olney’s word as the gospel, I do see the problem that you have with what Wren did this offseason.

The thing is: I don’t know that he had a choice. He rried to trade Lowe, and there were no takers. So, Frank was either faced with having to let Tim Hudson go, keep Vazquez for one more year, and then risk that Vazquez would have left after next year anyway. I didn’t like that we had to trade Javy, but I think Frank’s hand was forced.

As we know, pitchers rebound fine from TJ Surgery. It happens all the time. The Braves will be fine if Tim Hudson pitches like Tim Hudson did before the surgery, and if Lowe rebounds. One big question for us will be whether Tommy Hanson has a Sophomore Slump. Hopefully, that wont happen.

The Sporting News Baseball 2010 yearbook has the Braves picked to finish second, and the Cubs as the wild card. I agree with their prediction of second place in the East, because, if the Phillies are healthy, they should win the NL East fairly easily. I’m hopeful that we can snare a wild card, though. It would be nice to get Bobby back to the playoffs in his last season.

Olney’s not the gospel. I think the Braves have the potential to have a good season. Of course, we also have to hope that Billy Wagner doesn’t pitch like a 39 year old. I think if everyone on this team plays up to their potential, we will be fine.

Don

February 10th, 2010
9:01 am

Getting rid of Vazquez was absurd. With him went whatever slim chance we had for being competitive for several reasons:
(1) Almost certainly, at least one of the other starters we are counting on will either be injured or ineffective.
(2) Replacing someone who was that effective with someone almost as good does not translate to almost as many wins.
(3) And most significant of all — Like always, to win with Bobby Cox managing, you have to have pitching so far far superior to the other teams that it overcomes his incompetence and enables you to win over the long 162 game regular season schedule in spite of his inability to manage the offense and generate run production.

coach smith

February 10th, 2010
9:32 am

WHAT A JOKE!

The Phillies are in there on the strength of 2 Pitchers! The rest of the rotation cannot compare with the Braves’

And how can ANYONE argue that

White Sox: Jake Peavy, Mark Buehrle, John Danks, Gavin Floyd, Freddy Garcia.

OR

Angels: Jered Weaver, Scott Kazmir, Joe Saunders, Ervin Santana, Joel Pineiro.

Is better than LOWE, HUDSON, HANSON, JURJENS, and KAWAKAMI?

Peavy is always hurt, Garcia couldn’t pay anyone to let him pitch a year ago, and Floyd and Danks? Give me a break!!!!!!!!

and

after Weaver and Kazmir (who are no better than LOWE/HUDSON) the rest of the Angels’ rotation is not much to talk about

The Braves’ rotation DEPTH is what separates them from most. They should be 3rd behind the Yankees and Red Sox!

If you only have 2 great pitchers, they can’t help you 60% of the time

stew

February 10th, 2010
11:06 am

Truthfully, the difference between the Braves and Phils is Ryan Howard. Braves just don’t have 50hrs and 150rbis coming from one source. Coming off last year, Phils have only Hallyday and J.A. Happ as reliable starters and Braves have only JJ and Tommy (Huddy at this point is still unproven, Lowe was a batting practice pitcher, and KK walked the ballpark although he had a reputation for beating the other team’s ace). Still, if we kept Vasquez we would have been #2 on list because Yanks wouldn’t have had him. Therein lies the big difference between Yanks and other teams. If the Yanks had Lowe they wouldda dumped him and ate a good portion of his 15 million we couldn’t. You can only project coming off 2009. Nobody knows if Lowe is gonna rebound and Vasquez is gonna suck. At the end of the year Lowe had no velocity and Vasquez had all his pitches working. That’s all you can go on.

Don

February 10th, 2010
11:36 am

As stated over and over — With Cox managing, to win you can’t just have really good pitching and a good position lineup. You have to have great, great pitching so far far superior to the other teams that over the long 162 game schedule it overcomes his inabiality to manange the offense and generate consistant run production. Of course, obviously this does not work in the Post Season short series environment. With Vazquez went the slim chance that we had for being competitive in 2010.

pittman

February 10th, 2010
11:43 am

if you take all of hansons starts except his very first one his era was under 2.60 (are you kidding me not even lincecum did that good) juir had i think 25 quality starts out of thirty (extremely consistent), derek lowe will rebound cause he knows he doesnt have to be a no. 1 ace on this staff, and kawakami outdueled (ready for this) johan santana, cliff lee, roy halladay, clayton kershaw, and josh johnson all aces on their team name me another number 5 starter that defeated 5 aces if hudson can give 20-25 quality starts we will be having the best starters era like last year. And on javy vazquez he had to go people (baseball pitchers with that many innings on his arm say that he is overdue for an injury or a decline) his era will be around 4.5 with the yankees

WFURRV925

February 10th, 2010
12:12 pm

If Frank Wren somehow pulls the unimaginable & gets Johnny Damon, will not the financial windfall of trading Javy Vazquez be totally worth it…
The problem of this team last year was not the pitching (which was superb) but the inconsistency of the offense

Hoops Dawg

February 10th, 2010
1:34 pm

I haven’t read the 300 posts and somebody may have already said this, but I am old enough to remember when the the Braves traded their best pitcher away–Doyle Alexander to the tigers who subsequently won a division title. What did we get–John Smoltz and 14 division titles. If Vizcaino turns out to be half the pitcher that Smoltz was, the Braves win this trade by a mile.

chuck

February 10th, 2010
3:48 pm

I would love it if Vizcaino was ready in 2 years though…to replace KK. Turnaround on Smoltz was 2 years i believe from trade to majors.

In 2-3 years there will be no complaints about the pitching we have at the prices we pay for it. The only arguments will be whether we promoted/kept the right kids.

The economy has changed things. Teams aren’t willing to part with their players as easily, they are all working to sign them long-term earlier as well. So the number of players available via trade, or waiting til the deadline has shrunk. Prospects are at a premium, because every team needs at least 5-7 spots filled with close to major league minimum players.

People on here can’t have it both ways. You can’t sit here and complain about not paying guys, and then complain about paying them too much on the flip side. Especially when the market is being re-defined and right-priced.

I for one don’t think Johnny Damon is worth a penny more than $4MM…5 years ago, this guy is commanding $12MM or more for similar production. When markets correct like this, it lends to some errors being made. Although one could say that when dealing from weakness (as we were last Winter in the Lowe deal) you have to overspend at times.

luvthosedawgs68

February 10th, 2010
4:09 pm

The wildcard is Kawakami. I believe for a pitcher like Kenshin, it’s imperative for him to get off to a good start. I really believe he’ll have a good idea of what he wants to do with certain hitters this year, which wasn’t the case at the beginning of last year. I predict he wins 13-15 games this year.

Sutton's 'Fro

February 10th, 2010
5:46 pm

While I think we’ll miss Javy, I like the young pitchers we got back. My problems with Wren are 2-fold: 1) he overpaid for Lowe and KK, which backed us into a corner this year; and 2) we didn’t use any of the savings to get the big bat we needed. I think this is Mark’s main problem, too.

Any reasonable observer knows that the Braves didn’t trade Vazquez to get Melky — they did it to get room on the payroll (and to get more young pitchers). But they payroll space so far has only gotten us Troy Glaus and possibly Damon — two aging players with avg. power and sub-par defense. Add the fact that we lost Adam LaRoche, and I don’t see that much net improvement in our offense this year.

So we have a weaker rotation, an older bullpen, and a (possibly)slightly-improved offense. Exactly how does this improve our playoff chances again?

fieldofdreams

February 10th, 2010
7:02 pm

Totally disagree. Hanson’s going to win 20 games this year with or witthout run support. If the Braves hit we’ll win the East.

Taylor

February 10th, 2010
7:28 pm

I’d put the Braves rotation above the Phillies. Not sure about the others.

Sutton's Fro

February 10th, 2010
7:41 pm

Field…

Unfortunately “If the Braves hit, we’ll win the East.” has been a yearly sentiment for too long now. Having Chipper and “one-and-done power guy” ain’t enough, whether it’s Galarraga, Bonilla, Sheffield, J.D. Drew, Teixeira, LaRoche, Glaus, etc.

Robert

February 10th, 2010
10:44 pm

The only problem with the Braves rotation is the guy making the decisions about when where and how to deploy their services

scottbravesfan

February 11th, 2010
3:44 am

Buster Olney?

That guy is an idiot anyway. Anyone that works for ESPN is out of their mind.

brent a.

February 11th, 2010
7:04 am

Is the Braves offense better? Because pitching sure wasn’t our problem last year, nor will it be our problem in 2010.

Don

February 11th, 2010
10:07 am

Our pitching could and should be very good; and our offense (if properly managed) could produce enough runs. However, the problem is that Bobby Cox is the manager; and he does not understand or implement even the most simple and basic fundamentals and procedures for maximum run production. With his management, you are already 10 games behind before the season begins. To win, the pitching has to be great enough (so far superior to the other teams) to overcome his management procedures and lack thereof.

jared

February 11th, 2010
11:45 am

You are forgetting 1 thing. The Braves HAD to get rid of either Derek Lowe or Javier Vazquez in order to get rid of payroll. Even though it seems that the rotation will be worse this year, you’re forgetting something: Jair Jurrjens and Tommy Hanson are young and still developing and should be better this year than last year. Plus we will now have a full season of Hanson in the Major Leagues.