
An older Mike Bibby isn't quite the Mike Bibby of old, is he? (AJC photo by Phil Skinner)
1. Mike Bibby is in decline. We all praised Rick Sund for retaining three of the Hawks’ four key free agents, but the Bibby retention, while a boon to continuity, hasn’t paid off in production. Bibby is averaging 9.4 points, down from 14.9 last season. Granted, he’s also playing seven fewer minutes a game — that’s the Jamal Crawford effect — but seems older than 31. He has clearly lost a step and a half, and when a little man loses his quickness there’s not a lot left.
2. Crawford doesn’t mesh with Joe Johnson quite the way Bibby does. While technically the point guard, Bibby doesn’t control the ball all that much. He gives it to Joe and spots up for three-pointers. (I’m betting half of Bibby’s treys last season came off Johnson’s feeds.) Crawford needs the ball more. He’ll shoot but he’ll also penetrate. Bibby almost never ventures into the lane. And when it’s Crawford and Johnson together, as has become more the norm, the ball doesn’t move quite so well.
3. Al Horford is still underutilized offensively. He averaged 8.9 shots a game last season. He’s averaging 9.8 now. That’s still not enough. I mean, he’s making 58.3 percent of his shots. Why should a guy who shoots that well — fourth among NBA in field-goal percentage — not get the ball more?
4. Mike Woodson is shrinking his bench. This was bound to happen. Like most coaches, Woodson errs on the side of familiarity. But Joe Johnson has worked an average of 44 minutes over the past four games, including 45 against Oklahoma City on Monday. (By way of contrast, Kevin Durant played only 38 minutes.) Crawford played 30 minutes and Zaza Pachulia 15, but no other Hawk sub logged even 10. The idea behind a deeper bench was to keep guys fresh for April and May, and Johnson’s minutes-per-game are down by two over last season. But they won’t be if the current trend holds. And whatever became of Jeff Teague?
5. They’ve already lost five home games. That’s not a lot if you’re just trying to creep into the playoffs, but it is if you’re playing to finish first. No division winner in the East lost as many as 10 home games last season; Cleveland lost only two, Boston six. And the Hawks themselves were 31-10 at Philips Arena in 2008-2009, and they’re merely on pace to duplicate that. They’re leading the NBA Southeast at the season’s midpoint, but they’re still not quite dominant at home.
59 comments Add your comment
ILL-logical
January 20th, 2010
2:44 pm
My comment clearly states a Chris Paul TYPE PG. My point is that if Hawks took advantage of the athleticism of their front line and shared the ball more(read pass it to the frontcourt in the half court offense), they would be a much better team for a much longer time. These are the qualities that make CP3 the superstar that he is. I would just like the Hawks have a point guard who lead the team like him.
Further, while we all parse the success of the team over the last few years under Woodson’s tenure, the frustration I feel can be summed up by a paraphrase of the famous quote: Some look at (the Hawks)and say why; I look at the(Hawks) and say why not?
Sautee
January 20th, 2010
6:15 pm
Ill-logical,
“My point is that if Hawks took advantage of the athleticism of their front line and shared the ball more(read pass it to the frontcourt in the half court offense), they would be a much better team for a much longer time.”
So why do you think they fail to do that?
Mark Bradley
January 20th, 2010
6:22 pm
The Hawks aren’t a bad passing team. Except when Joe puts his head down and decides he has to do everything himself.
Jay
January 20th, 2010
7:43 pm
Thank you for talking about #4. This is the main reason why I think Woodson should not be extended. We’ll never go deep when we burn up JJ every year.
Tweets that mention 5 things about the first-place Hawks that are bugging me | Mark Bradley -- Topsy.com
January 21st, 2010
12:14 am
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mark Bradley, Terence Jones. Terence Jones said: 5 things about the first-place Hawks that are bugging me: Atlanta Journal Constitution (blog) And the Hawks themse… http://bit.ly/6n0U7C [...]
Todd
January 21st, 2010
10:16 am
Every point you mentioned (except maybe Bibby slowing up a bit) should be addressed by good coaching. We need the media to hold Woodson accountable. The constant lack of ball movement, reliance on isolation (with Joe repeatedly taking difficult shots), Josh Smith constantly drifting outside where he can’t hit the boards are Woodson’s and his staff’s fault. He can’t put up with that. The Hawks are doomed to another playoffs disappointment if Woodson doesn’t get his act together.
Mark Bradley
January 21st, 2010
10:18 am
Maybe you’re seeing something I’m not, Todd, but I haven’t noted Josh Smith drifting outside nearly as much this season.
KentWatson
January 21st, 2010
10:55 am
The Hawks are the only local franchise out of the four major sports to upgrade their team in the offseason, making it more competitive. I hate that the Hawks parted with flip murray, but they brought in enough talent to compensate for that loss, thus the first place standing in the division. You cant complain about a team in first place, which means they made all the right moves. How long they will stay in first place is another story. When Orlando heats up, we may have to settle for second place in the division. Plus, Im not completely sold on Woodsen being the right coach for the Hawks. Avery Johnson would be better.
Bill C
January 21st, 2010
1:18 pm
Agree about Bibby and Teague..Woodson should have been feeding Teague minutes early this season to gear him up for the stretch and to save Bibby’s legs..Instead, he’s snoozing on the bench and Bibby looks 50 years old already..We are still to much of a perimeter team, without needing to be. Horford, Smith, and Williams can put the ball in the basket inside, but get far to few shots. When the playoffs come, the court shrinks and we all know it’s about the inside game first..