5 questions about the Braves, a couple involving Soriano

Maybe it's just me, but I think they're going to miss this guy. (AJC photo by Bob Andres)

Maybe it's just me, but I think they're going to miss this guy. (AJC photo by Bob Andres)

1. Why pay the same money to an older reliever who hasn’t had a save since undergoing Tommy John surgery in 2008? Billy Wagner is 38 and will make $7 million next season. Rafael Soriano will turn 30 this week and, after agreeing to re-up for a a year after being dealt to Tampa Bay, will earn $7 million in 2009. Soriano had 27 saves last season; Wagner had none. I don’t get this one at all.

2. Why offer arbitration to Soriano, whom they had no intention of keeping, and not offer it to Adam LaRoche, whom they need? I know there are issues of draft-pick compensation and, as ever, money — the Braves don’t want to pay LaRoche what his market value stands to be — but I don’t get this, either. The Braves want LaRoche to stick around for less money and bridge the gap to Freddie Freeman, whom they hope will be ready in 2011. But what if Ol’ Rochy gets a better (read: longer)  deal someplace else? Who’s the first baseman then — Martin Prado? And who plays second base if Prado scoots over? (Not Kelly Johnson. He just got non-tendered.)

3. Why the utter desperation to trade Derek Lowe? No, he didn’t have the greatest of seasons, but he did win 15 games. Does one lesser season invalidate everything the Braves believed about Lowe 11 months ago? I understand the Braves need a big bat in the worst way, but is Lowe the only trade lever the Braves have? And doesn’t the appearance of being keen to unload a big-salaried guy serve to diminish the big-salaried guy’s value even more?

4. Doesn’t dumping Ryan Church prove Frank Wren messed up the Jeff Francoeur trade? That transaction wasn’t so much a swap as a divestiture. The Braves needed to cut the cord with Francoeur, who’d become an outsize presence — he didn’t produce much but was the most-discussed man on the roster. Imagine if Matt Diaz had replaced Francoeur as the starter in right field: That would have been the hot-button topic for weeks. When Diaz supplanted Church in right field, nobody said two words. The Braves didn’t really need a player in return; they just needed Francoeur to go somewhere else.

5. Does Wren have the worst instincts in the history of humankind? You know how it’s said that, when in doubt on a multiple-choice test, your first guess is apt to be correct? The Braves’ general manager gives lie to that. Last offseason he tried like crazy to land Jake Peavy, who won only nine games and worked 101 2/3 innings in 2009; tried to sign Rafael Furcal, who hit .269, and tried to sign Ken Griffey Jr., who hit .214. Well, the Braves were better off with Javier Vazquez, Yunel Escobar and Garret Anderson than any of the above. A year from now, we might well be saying, “You know, they should’ve just kept the closer they had.”

238 comments Add your comment

Keith

December 14th, 2009
5:12 am

I don’t care if I’m first or not.

Don’t know if Wagner is the answer, but I was definitely ready for both Soriano and Gonzalez to go.
Adam LaRoche showed that he had improved greatly from his 1st stint with the Braves and should be top priority in resigning.
Frank Wren does make me wonder about his decision making ability.

Ostrich Racer

December 14th, 2009
5:16 am

I agree on Wagner — no reason to believe he’s going to be worth the commitment. And we need LaRoche back. I’m betting we keep Lowe, and he’s the closer by the All-Star Break.

"Chef" Tim Dix

December 14th, 2009
5:16 am

Mark, come on, Worst instints? He basically rebuilt the rotation in one year, refused to kiss Tommy / John’s can and got something for frenchy.

Lowe tailed off significantly for what ever reason, combined with a weak free agent market-need specific makes a trade of some sort the Braves route to take.

Soriano? A real nut case.

"Chef" Tim Dix

December 14th, 2009
5:20 am

If these moves concern you Mark, wait till he replaces the Legend next off season.

"Chef" Tim Dix

December 14th, 2009
5:25 am

BTW, welcome back.

fieldofdreams

December 14th, 2009
5:34 am

There shall come forth a shoot from the stump of Jesse, and a branch from his roots shall bear fruit.
And the Spirit of the Lord shall rest upon him, the Spirit of wisdom and understanding, the Spirit of counsel and might, the Spirit of knowledge and the fear of the Lord . And his delight shall be in the fear of the Lord Isaiah 11:13 Merry Christmas!

HomeofdaBrave

December 14th, 2009
5:41 am

“A year from now, we might well be saying, “You know, they should’ve just kept the closer they had.”

With the so-called “hitters” the Braves have been linked to, we could very much be saying, “you know, we should’ve kept that Francouer kid” come next year too.

TampaGator

December 14th, 2009
6:18 am

The Braves did not want to pay Sariano long-term money due to his injury issues. I am sure they thought some team would and that he would not accept arbitration. If they knew what they knew now, I am sure they would have not signed Wagner. But they didn’t, and Wagner is just as good as Soriano for one or two years. And the Braves got a decent middle reliever in the deal. So it worked out OK. Soriano was good, but Wagner is a better closer. Period. Francour was horrible as a Brave. Glad he is gone. The one I do not understand is LaRouche. Who plays first? Diaz? The Braves will finish 3rd, 4th, or 5th this year without a first baseman like LaRouche.

RomeDawg

December 14th, 2009
6:24 am

Good to have you back MB!

Mama Cox

December 14th, 2009
6:25 am

A year from now they will be saying “Mama’s gone”.

Dap01

December 14th, 2009
6:47 am

I agree MB. We need LaRoche (or atleast someone comparable) and yet we do not offer him arbitration, which would at worst give up a very good first baseman for 1 year.

Instead, our expectations are being lowered in order to get a couple of guys that are below average and somehow, we are suppose to be happy.

falcon 71

December 14th, 2009
6:49 am

they did the right thing with RS as he is flirting with TJ surgery have you noticed his mechanics. that said usually nowdays players return from TJ stronger than ever so id rather have BW for the next few years.

sansho1

December 14th, 2009
6:51 am

Given Cox’s propensity to wear out relievers, the moves made sense to me. I no longer think of relief pitchers as multi-year propositions.

JSS

December 14th, 2009
6:53 am

I thought you had decided to start exploring more reasonable life experiences, life being a Grateful Cathead… Following the Cats all around the Nation…

FOr some strange reason, Braves fan have started to treat Lowe like he is a reincarnation of Russ Ortiz… LaRoche, well you it is too obvious for the Braves to see that he plays his best here… Congratulations on missing bizarre world 1009.

Michael Scharff

December 14th, 2009
7:02 am

Dude, where have you been? I hope all is well at Casa Bradley – good to have you back!

Mike Lum

December 14th, 2009
7:04 am

Good responses (especially you, Chef), bad column. Mark, you left out several key facts…
1. How many saves did Soriano blow last year? He was far from a sure thing. Wagner is an upgrade, at a cheaper price.
2. Wren knows LaRoche wants a high price AND more years. By not offering arbritration, Wren hopes to get him (or someone else) cheaper. This isn’t New York…he’s not operating with an unlimited budget.
3. Mark, Lowe is on the market because the Braves have 6 starters. They’re not trading JJ or Hanson. Hudson was just signed, at a relatively low price. Vasquez had a great year. Who would take Kawakami’s big contract? Trading Lowe would free up money to sign your buddy LaRoche.
4. Church had to be dropped only when Soriano re-upped. That basically makes it a Frenchy for Soriano trade…not bad. Or Frenchy for whoever that sign with Soriano’s salary slot…the new setup guy. TampaGator is right: Frenchy was horrible as a Brave, the worst hitting position player in the bigs. The Braves improved just by getting rid of him.
5. We were all happy last year that Wren was being open with who he was chasing. A year ago we didn’t know Junior and Furcal would stink in 2009, that Peavy would get hurt. There are reasons the Braves are letting Gonzo and Soriano walk. Hindsight is always 20/20.

hop

December 14th, 2009
7:09 am

mark, you make some very good points and laRoche is a no brainer.
i am afraid the penny-penchin will place the braves in another third place finish behind the phillies and mets.

Kenneth

December 14th, 2009
7:10 am

1. Hindsight is 20/20 Mark. The Braves and everybody else thought Soriano would not agree to arbitration.

2. You are right about keeping Laroche

3. Which pitcher are they supposed to trade? Lowe makes the most sense because of his high salary.

4. You didn’t offer any alternative to what Wren did in trading for Church. What was he supposed to do? Francouer needed to go and it wasn’t like there was much of a market or they wouldn’t have traded him to someone in their division.

5. That’s a little harsh isn’t it. Could anyone predict that Peavy was going to have that kind of year? ‘

It wasn’t who made some bad trades that have come back to haunt this team. Those 5 players for eixera and the one with St. Louis: Wainwright for J.D. Drew…………………

Kudzu

December 14th, 2009
7:16 am

Nice article- NOT. I can’t take you seriously, you’re so d*&^ negative!

MiltonDawg

December 14th, 2009
7:19 am

trust in Wren. we all gave him hell for the Smoltz/Glavine deal but look how pitching ended up last year. still waiting for the “big bat” deal that’s supposed to boost our outfield. maybe freeman is ready to go at 1B.

willie martinez

December 14th, 2009
7:32 am

Mark, i thought you had pulled a judge crater on us.

Bill James

December 14th, 2009
7:34 am

Talent is all about prediction…the “basebal know it alls” base it on past performance only. Schuerholz knew when to “retire.’ When Tommy, John and Greg were gone. Frank Wren guesses about talent like everyone else does 50/50 . People here predict that Jeff Francouer would always suck – but the Mets have guessed differently. I’m with the Mets and I hope he tears it up this year because I love the Braves but I despise many of these Brave fans.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
7:41 am

Wren is far from through, but I believe he has made the right moves in almost every instance. Time will tell, but I would bet that Wagner has a better/healthier year than Soriano. Those jumping on him should wait and see what team we put on the field on opening day.
Mark, I’m sure you wrote this to stir things up. You cannot possibly believe that Wren has terrible instincts. All of us were clamering for a revamped pitching staff. He persued the best available. We all thought he needed to sign Lowe, even if the price was high. Just b e glad he didn’t give in to the demands of the Padres for Peavy, when they kept escallating the asking price.
BTW, TED TURNER IS STILL GONE.

JeanE

December 14th, 2009
7:44 am

I hate to say it but you are so right, M.B., these moves make no sense to me. Now we have 2 old guys in the bullpen instead of a young Soriano and Gonzo. I am one of the few who isn’t desperate for a “big bat” for this team. We were hitting well down the stretch once they let Matty D play every day and I love the chemistry of this team. Fix Mac’s eyes and we are good to go. I would love to have DeRo back but only if he doesn’t take away playing time from Matty D. DeRo is at the end of his career and can still hit while being invaluable playing many different positions. If Heyward is ready to start season in right, great, plug Matty D in at left. Nate in center and Jordon backing up them. I just don’t think they’re going to pay out for Roachy which is a shame. Great player, excellent 1st baseman. Frank Wren is a big idiot in my opinion and nothing he’s done has changed my mind on that. Good luck unloading D. Lowe, unfortunately, it will probably be Javy that goes. Big Mistake.

MitchC

December 14th, 2009
7:45 am

Mark, I dont agree with numbers three and four on your list.

This team needs to clear up payroll to try and take a run at getting a good hitter. Lowe makes 15 mil a year, and is much older than Vazquez. When you ask if Lowe is the only trade lever the Braves have. The obvious answer is no, but.. I still think that trading Lowe would be better than trading Vazquez, due to the contract Lowe has, and Lowe’s age.

As for the question if dumping Church messed up the Jeff trade, my answer to that is no too. I was on the fence about Jeff being traded, but, does it mean we have to keep an unproductive Ryan Church, just to say we ended up getting something out of the trade? If Church wasnt going to help us, let him go.

One final point: Economically, we cant keep both Lowe and Vazquez and expect to get a hitter. One of them is going to go. While I realize that Vazquez might get us more in return, I still think Lowe should be the one to be traded, because he’s older, and maybe on the downside. I realize Javy is a free agent after 2010, but, if we could re sign him, he could help us for more years than Lowe.

I will say that I do agree that we could have kept Soriano, and offered arbitration to Laroche. I wasnt thrilled with either of those moves.

falcon 71

December 14th, 2009
7:46 am

here is the data on Diaz vs JF for 09

JF 157 games = 15 hr 76 rbi 280 ba 309 obp

MD 125 games = 13 hr 58 rbi 313 ba 390 obp

GoVols

December 14th, 2009
7:47 am

Agree with all your points, Mark. This franchise has always favored pitching over hitting with the possible exception of the time they brought in Sheffield. I think they need at least two big bats. We are hoping for an improved Chipper but at his age you can’t rely on it and I personally don’t like being overly reliant on a catcher – no matter how good – because of the aches and pains he must endure at his position. We should be bargaining from a position of strength given our pitching depth.

Heath

December 14th, 2009
7:54 am

I think the Braves organization knows that starting pitching is not a concern this year anyway. Until Cox is gone, our starters could have a no hitter going through 5 innings and he will start warming up Mahoney, I mean Soriano.

Bank Walker, Texas Ranger

December 14th, 2009
7:57 am

I like taking the chance on Wagner replacing Gonzo and keeping Soriano. What I don’t understand is how you can trade a closer and get nothing for him.

Agent7g

December 14th, 2009
8:02 am

Soriano was awful in crucial situations last year. Do you remember the game ending homer to the prolific Ross Gload? Wagner has proven he saves big games season after season.
Why not trade Vasquez now? Lowe was fairly solid and as a number 3 starter he might be better than a number 1. Vasquez was great but has never had great back to back seasons, trade him while his value is high.

Jam

December 14th, 2009
8:04 am

I haven’t paid to see the Braves or any other MLB team play in more than twenty years. You have so many marginally talented players making millions of dollars a year that it’s a freaking joke.

Major league sports just plain suck. It’s all about money now, and there’s no love of the game or loyalty to a team any more.

So count me out!

BobJ

December 14th, 2009
8:05 am

It is easy to say LaRoche should stay when we only saw his second half. Lest we forget, he’s pretty much a second half hitter so we saw a much more productive hitter than we’d see for a full season. Perhaps we can find someone who produces the full season because that’s what we need with our limited offense.

Closers are a gamble at best so you pick your hand and don’t wait for hand to pick you. Starting pitchers are a premium, but we don’t have the budget to keep 6. I don’t really see a better alternative than Lowe so you can argue why to keep him, but you can’t really give a good option to replace that which gives us more for a hitter and less impacts our pitching.

Dumping Church says he didn’t deliver and doesn’t have anything to do with Frenchy directly. As has been said, you don’t hold him just to say you had value from the Frenchy deal. You’re better off to take that money and use it wisely. We need money for good players not warm bodies.

mountain_jim

December 14th, 2009
8:05 am

welcome back Mark – the ajc spreads you guys so thin these days it’s real noticeable when you or Jeff takes a vacation. I agree your closer questions are curious.

Atticus

December 14th, 2009
8:06 am

I read where Cox said we are going after a big bat with the article on Heyward. Huh?

If the Braves organization thinks they can beat the Phils just adding Heyward and possibly some middle level jorneyman OF like Nady, they are fooling themselves and it will be time for me to go elsewhere for entertainment.

El Bravo

December 14th, 2009
8:08 am

Mark, you are way off on the Lowe issue. Is not about his ability (he is still a very good pitcher) but instead about using his salary to address other areas of need. With Hudson back healty our starting rotation stands to be better than last year. Not only that, but trading Lowe gives us the flexibility to resign Vasquez who appears to be very comfortable here in Atlanta. That gives us a younger rotation that projects well over the next 3 to 4 years…

That's Mr. Chavez to you

December 14th, 2009
8:14 am

Hey, I ain’t Swiss cheese here, pal. I’m younger and better looking than Soriano, in addition to my killer curveball.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
8:16 am

I’d agree that Soriano wasn’t the ideal closer. (Mariano Rivera is the ideal.) But I don’t know that Wagner is any upgrade at age 38.

And thanks for noticing I was gone last week. It’s nice to be missed

Frank Wren

December 14th, 2009
8:17 am

Atticus, I base all my decisions on making you happy. Call me.

Bubba

December 14th, 2009
8:19 am

The only real “complaint” I have with your issues is that Wren lacks the tact of his predecessor. As far as Lowe goes, the signing, to me, had a “we settled for the best of what was available” feel to it. Management’s feelings on the signing seemed tepid at best. They spent too much for Lowe then, and they’re gonna pay now. I think Wren should plunk down some money and hire a good PR person.

DangerousDan87

December 14th, 2009
8:22 am

Earlier,someone said the Braves only concentrate on pitching and not hitting except when we got Gary Sheffield? Ya, that worked out well. Sheff had 3 hits in two postseasons .063 and .143. that worked out well. I’m worried about Wagner also. I hope he isn’t our next Bruce Sutter who blew out his arm after he signed a BIG $10 Mill contract. I worked radio then and tried to interview him. He said,” I don’t talk on days I don’t pitch.” I guess he talks alot now.lol Go Braves.

GoBama!

December 14th, 2009
8:28 am

I like Rochey – but he has always stunk in the 1st half of the season and we need a fast start next year for a change. The Wagner/Soriano trade off blows my mind. Sure, Soriano has some downside but there’s no reason in the world to believe Wagner is going to return to form. This is a roll of the dice at best and one we didn’t have to take. Guys, we are going to have to trade at least one starter and unfortunately DLowe makes the most sense. As far as the outfield is concerned, we should have tried to keep Garret Anderson. His numbers were down a little last year but I think he still has another year left in the tank.

Mark Bradley is an idiot

December 14th, 2009
8:28 am

6th Important question:

Why does Mark Bradley continue to get paid $$$ to write stupid columns?

Greg

December 14th, 2009
8:31 am

The only MAJOR successful strategic move Wren has made was getting Jurjjens. Other than that (and maybe other than the LaRoche deal), he has been crap.

Thank the lord Peavy, Furcal, trading Esco, etc. didnt work.

Mike

December 14th, 2009
8:32 am

Uh, OK Jam, you’re out.

O'Brien

December 14th, 2009
8:40 am

Mark,

The Braves knew they were going to lose Gonzales, so the fact that Wagner was left handed was a big plus (he had had success against some of the guys in our division, (especially the left handers, eg Ryan Howard)).

And except for the TJ surgery last year, Wagner has been much better/healthier than Soriano. Lets not forget 2 seasons ago, when everytime they thought Soriano was healthy, he said he wasn’t.

And as for LaRoche, they dont want to give him a 1 yr $8-$9 mil contract. Sure, he played well in the second half. But it was a contract year, and he is a slow starter anyways. There are a lot of options (cheaper, but more risky), and LaRoche’s price might come down once the market settles.

John Tucker

December 14th, 2009
8:41 am

Bradley<

You obviously did not watch Sorianon blow saves and reduce 3 and 4 run leads to 1-run leads by giving up homers under pressure.

Thoose of us fans who did are not surpridsed Soriaano is gone and would be disappointed inthe extreme if he started 2010 as a Brave.

Aside from his scowl, Soriano had no intensity, no real determination to win. He just wnet out and threw gas, which was too often flat or wild.

As for Jeffy Francouer. No regular Braves fan who saw his abysmal lack of plate coverage and 2 and 3 strikeouts per game (and 0 walks) in 2007, 2008 and the first half of 2009 was and remains anythig but happy with Francouer's departure.

That Jeffy got his groove swing back the last half of 2009 is fine with us, but at least the Braves don't have to watch his unbearably long slumps anymore. Same for Kelly Johnson. When they were hot, oit was fun to watch, but they became hot less and less for shorter and shorter periods oof time. When Bobby Cox finally decides to bench a regular, it is at least 15-18 months late.

Church had promisem byut Yunnel Escobar's knee had done more damage than we knew and Braves doctors said he was ikay. CHurch's failure does not in any way diminish the courage and decisiveness Wren exhibited in pulling the trigger to deal Francouer.

If Francuer's hitting is transformed by thee trade, good for him. But, for the Braves to keep him and have him and Terry Pendleton squabbling in the epaper about the effectiveness of TP' hitting coach tips was certainly an untenable siutuation.

personaly, I think TP needs to be gone too, but unfortunately for the braves' future TP seems to be the Manager in waiting. which is the scariest thought I've had in years.

TP was a great player, but he lacks the patience or the teaching skills to handle and bring along youneg talent.

Herschel Talker

December 14th, 2009
8:43 am

MB:

You’re damn right about Soriano. Wren is an idiot. He was quoted on the radio last week as saying that he would not have any problem trading Soriano since the market for closers had not yet heated up. Well, if that’s the case, what was the rush in signing Wagner? Why not wait until AFTER Soriano had made his arbitration decision before looking at free agents. Completely illogical the way it went down. Wagner is getting paid what Soriano was going to be paid, and he’s 10 years older. WTF???

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
8:47 am

I say it again: Nothing good was going to happen for Francoeur as a Brave. He needed a fresh start elsewhere. If the Braves had gotten Greg Norton for him, I’d still have called that a necessary deal.

Speaking of which: Why is Wren waiting so long to re-up Norton? The market for .110-hitting pinch-hitters is boiling hot.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
8:48 am

Bank Walker – You trade Soriano for “nothing” to get rid of his salary. Basically we traded Soriano for Wagner. Time will tell if it was good or bad, but I never trusted Soriano, and I like the deals.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
8:51 am

Jam – If you feel that way, why do you care enough to read the blog?

todd

December 14th, 2009
8:53 am

Everyone needs to calm down and give Wren a chance to do his job. There is plenty of time to put together a team. Fans are only seeing half of the puzzle and already are jumping to conclusions. Let’s have this discussion in March.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
8:56 am

Age doesn’t mean as much as performance, and each person is different. HOW OLD IS MARIANO R.? I think Wagner is a better bet than “always hurt” Soriano. By the way, many pitchers have returned strong from TJ surgery.

Braves Fan Since 1956

December 14th, 2009
8:57 am

It’s not who the relievers are it’s how Mr Cox will use them. Since Wagner is coming off TJ surgery he’ll get the most use whether he’s still in the healing process or not. Cox doesn’t match up a pitcher’s strength to a batter, he just has relievers that pitch certain innings no matter who the batters are.

Outside Robber

December 14th, 2009
9:00 am

Mark is right on the money with all his points. It sometimes seems that the Braves only want those kind of guys that Cox can rely on not to make waves. (Escobar’s talent alone keeps him around but for how long?)

Bullwinkle

December 14th, 2009
9:00 am

Why not keep Lowe and put him in the bullpen? He was once a heck of a closer. They guy had 42 saves for the Red Sox in 2000.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
9:03 am

Bullwinkle – 1 reason $$$$$$$$$$

Richard Hamilton

December 14th, 2009
9:13 am

Soriano and Wagner are both injury risks. Wagner probably has a better injury history, and he looked solid after he came back from injury. It’s a one year deal, either it works out great or it blows up in your face.

I really don’t understand your point with #1 because there is a higher risk of injury with both these guys. It’s a take your pick scenario in my opinion.

Don

December 14th, 2009
9:18 am

As always (for some unexplained reason) like the other AJC Writers, you fail to ask the most significant question to the success of the Braves. — Why is Bobby Cox still here? It seems obvious that Frank Wren does not have the authority to fire him. Cox’s incompetency is obvious beyond words. You question Frank Wren but ignore the incompetency and blunders of Bobby Cox game after game after game. This is not to say that your questions relating to Wren are not valid; but compared to Bobby Cox, he is a model GM; and his negative effects on the team are nothing compared to Cox.

Bravedawg

December 14th, 2009
9:23 am

Mark–I’m thoroughly confused. This column sounds like someone else wrote it and put your name on it. You usually seem to be measured in your opinions. This sounds like a grumpy old man (which maybe you are, I don’t know).

1. Soriano has a horrible injury history. That’s part of the reason why it was necessary for us to have Gonzalez as a backup closer. The Braves weren’t sure how much Soriano would get in arbitration, or sign for in a new deal (many, including DOB, thought it would be much more than $7mill–closer to $9mill). So, revisionist history here, Mark. You’re better than that.

2. Yeah, they need a 1B, but LaRoche did his usual second-half surge, which they were afraid would price him out of their plans through arbitration. Someone above said Laroche had proven that he’s much improved; this is not the case at all. There’s a reason why we got him straight up for Casey Kotchman, people. He did in ‘09 exactly what he’s done in the last 3-4 years: stink it up in the first half, tear it up in the second half. If he does end up signing with us again, I’ll be sure to get on the blog comments to see how many of you are ripping him in May when he’s hitting .230 with 3 HRs.

3. Someone already stated above, but they have 6 starters, Mark. 4 of which are not going anywhere, the fifth of which no one has any interest in. Lowe is a durable guy who has pitched successfully in the past – proven track record that shows (hopefully) that last season was an aberration. And “he won 15 games????” Really, Mark? We know how dumb it is to judge a pitcher solely by games. Again, you’re better than that.

4. This one REALLY confuses me. For someone who should send Francoeur a Heavenly Ham for giving him 300 football fields worth of material to write about, now you’re defending him? HE WAS THE WORST HITTING POSITION PLAYER IN THE MAJORS FOR AN ENTIRE SEASON. And I see that above, you commented that Wren was just lucky to get anyone. So, what, exactly, is your point, then???

5. Everyone thought Peavy was the next (insert superstar pitcher here) last year. DOB was practically salivating over him, and so was everyone else. If I had the energy to look up your past columns, I would probably find you salivating as well. He didn’t have a great year. My guess is he does have a good year this year. Furcal was a mess. Glad we didn’t get him. But Griffey Jr was much closer to Garret Anderson than you might think. Because Jr. walks a ton, and GA doesn’t (hardly at all), their OPSs were much closer to each other than one would think. Again, you’re better than that, Mark.

Dap01

December 14th, 2009
9:25 am

If a basketball player averages 6 points in the first half and 14 in the 2nd half of each game, he is an 20 ppg player. A valuable commodity.

If LaRoche averages .280 and 25 hrs for a year, is not valuable.

Brian

December 14th, 2009
9:29 am

First, I don’t think Soriano would have signed for just 7 million with the Braves…he would have submitted a number higher than that in arbitration and they would have had to meet in the middle. He signed with TB for that to make sure the trade happened, because he definitely wanted to be traded and pitch in the 9th inning.

Wagner showed no ill effects from his surgery last year and I don’t see any reason to think he will be worse than Soriano next year. If I had to project, I would say Wagner will have a superior season.

Finally, I don’t think the Braves particularly liked Soriano, and vice versa. He did not seem to be a very good clubhouse presence. Of course, I also don’t think Soriano’s the type to really like any team he’s on, or anybody for that matter. Just the way he is.

Rich Hoodenpyle

December 14th, 2009
9:29 am

Trade Wren. Wouldn’t it be interesting to allow Bobby Cox to put a team together before he retires as manager and starts his “consulting” role. MB …..all of your questions are “right on”.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
9:30 am

Don – I realize you know more than all the baseball players, managers, and experts, and are smarter than members of the braves organization.
However, you are always saying that the talent should have been enough to win. Why haven’t the Yankees won every year? You also give Bobby no credit for the fact that many of those talented players CAME to the Braves because of him (for example, Greg Maddox) or STAYED because of him (For example, Smoltz, Chipper). At any rate, he will be gone after 2010, and he’s not leaving before then, so why don’t you give it a rest????

Ted

December 14th, 2009
9:32 am

1) Soriano has been hurt 3 times in the last 6 years. Wagner once. Wagner may be older, but he’s as likely, if not more likely, to actually be healthy in 2010. Chronically injured players do NOT suddenly start staying healthy for extended periods of time. And if health is app. equal, to pretend Soriano is anywhere close to Wagner as a closer is delusional. 3/4 of one season does not make Soriano somehow better than a guy with almost 400 saves in his career and who showed app. the same fastball post-surgery as pre-surgery.

2) Money. Braves have app. $4-5MM (if payroll is at $95MM) + salary of traded away SP to find a 1B and an OF. LaRoche at $9MM severely limits options. And if Soriano was 50-50 to accept arb based on how few top tier closers on the market, LaRoche would be even higher based on how many mid-tier 1B options are on the market.

3) Money. See 2). Moving Lowe gives more flexibility in 2010 and beyond. If Braves have to eat more than $3MM this year, they’re better off trading Vazquez (and they get a greater return). Doesn’t help in 2011-2, but if Lowe bounces back at all, his contract is less of a hinderence as well.

4) Without the trade, Francoeur is the one who was non-tendered, not Church. The deal was a nothing for a possible something. That the something also turned into nothing was no loss.

Sonny Clusters

December 14th, 2009
9:35 am

We was glad to see you back Mark. Hope the batteries are recharged and you are ready for some serious bowl blogging. As for the statement, “The Braves didn’t really need a player in return; they just needed Francoeur to go somewhere else.” Sending a Dairy Queen man to a city that has no Dairy Queens was especially cruel.

im4ball

December 14th, 2009
9:35 am

I like the Wagner deal but given his age and the surgery I do have some concern about his capability to last and be effective over a complete season. I was hoping that he would share the closing job with Soriano. Now, who will that be? Maybe Chavez?

I think you can never have too many pitchers and am not sold on Kawakami as a starter. That said, the Braves need a bat more right now and it appears that moving Lowe is the least of evils.

Vasquez is exactly what we thought he would be; an innings eater who gives you a chance to win and allows you to use your pen less. Based on this, I would not trade him.

By moving Lowe (or any other starter) the Braves are banking on Hudson being strong enough to last a season; an unknown given his surgery.

The Braves are also hoping Kawakami can become the starter he was supposed to be. Maybe being a fifth starter will give him the time to develop.

Brian

December 14th, 2009
9:35 am

Herschel Talker, I think one reason they signed Wagner and Saito so quickly was to further encourage Soriano and Gonzalez to reject arbitration by filling up their potential 8th and 9th inning jobs.

I think you’ll find after all the closers find their homes that Wagner’s deal will not be overmarket. And you gotta expect the guy to perform. He has a cumulative 2.21 ERA over the last 9 YEARS. Soriano only had one single season where his ERA was that low, and that was in Seattle.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
9:39 am

We did not get “nothing” for Frenchy. We got some performance out of Church. YOU COULD NOT PREDICT THAT HE WOULD BE HURT. AT LEAST HE WAS NOT LAST IN THE LEAGUE IN BATTING AVERAGE. What we really gained is what we would be paying Frenchy if he was still on the team. If we non-tendered him, we would be in the same place we are now. He may make a great comeback, but that wasn’t happening with us.

Sonny Clusters

December 14th, 2009
9:41 am

We was at the Dairy Queen once and Warren Buffet came in and ordered a Dilly Bar. We was wondering what the super rich ordered at DQ. Warren Buffet told us everything on the menu was good. He owns Dairy Queen. He bought me and Jeff some Dilly Bars before he left. Nice man.

SadDawg

December 14th, 2009
9:41 am

Mark, I think we’ll be seeng less and less of what Cox wants (KJ, Norton) and more of what the team needs now that the retirement is set.. I know you love Bobby, but even you saw the idiocy of Norton…. I think Wren has done a remarkable job since JS retired beginning with getting usout of a bad JS deal by getting something (Kotchman) for Tex and later turning that into a trade for for a red-hot LaRoche. He also got us a good, young CF, and a 3 excellent starting pitchers. With a little more hitting, all of our starters would have had 15-plus wins. If Chipper had hit a lick, we win the wild card race…

collegeballfan

December 14th, 2009
9:42 am

The Braves should have kept Soriano and told the wallet to free up more payroll money. Wagner, Siato & Soriano and neither may be worth a plug nickel. You just never know.

What’s in your wallet?

Don

December 14th, 2009
9:43 am

IF you are going to deal Pitching, and that in itself is a big IF; but if you are going to deal Pitching, why in the world are the Braves in such a hurry, why are they creaating the impression that they will deal it for decrease value? Did Pitching all of a sudden become no longer the most valuable and most sought after thing in baseball? With Soriano and Lowe being considered expencable (by them), they were sitting in a great, great position to get exceptional value from other teams. All they had to do was wait and play hard to get. The pressing need for these two Pitchers would develop quickly by one or more teams before of soon after the season begins, probably sighificantly before. Instead they have given Soranio away and have created the impression that Lowe can be had for next to nothing and without paying his full salary. Do you really think that there would not have been a significant demand for a closer or set up man of Soriano’s ability or that no team will be in a position of jumping to take a chance on a Pitcher of Lowe’s background. The way this has been and is being dealt with is unbelievable. The only thing worse has been the decision to keep Booby Cox – but Wren probably did not have the authority to fire him.

Hillbilly Deluxe

December 14th, 2009
9:45 am

Mark, good to see you back. Several people asked Schultz where you were but I don’t think he ever answered the question. We was afraid something bad had happened to you.

Anybody who thinks this team has always focused on pitching over hitting, wasn’t around for the glorious 70’s.

On your points:
1: Agreed
2: I think they are gambling with LaRoche for budget reasons and it’s a gamble they are likely to lose.
3: I’ve always thought the guy was over-rated but I wouldn’t give him away either.
4: The Francouer deal had to be done for all parties concerned.
5: Wren has made some good moves on occasion but he’s made some bad ones too. After this year we should know for sure whether he has “the Right Stuff” or not.

Sonny Clusters

December 14th, 2009
9:45 am

Say you was raised on Dairy Queen and you was a star at every level and then you was Major League and struggling and on the road and away from good Dairy Queen treats and then . . . Bang! You are a New York Mets player and they is no Dairy Queen anywhere close to Citi Field. What do you do? You call old friend Warren Buffet and ask him to build a DQ close by. We are waiting to see what happens.

AndyC

December 14th, 2009
9:50 am

Mark,

I tend to agree with you somewhat on the Soriano/Wagner issue. I think only time will tell if this was a good move. It was a gamble to be sure but I have a feeling this one will work out for the Braves.

The Braves didn’t want to take a chance going to arb with LaRoche with the possibility that he might accept. I don’t think the Braves thought there was any chance that Soriano would accept arb so that’s why they offered to him. Now LaRoche is asking for a 3 year deal worth $30+ million from Seattle so I don’t think there is any chance he is coming back to the Braves.

Lowe has to go to get a hitter for the lineup. He is the most expensive starter on a staff of 6. He has to go to free up money.

Frenchy had to go. Period. It didn’t matter if he got a box of baseballs for him, it was a good move.

Wren had good instincts with Vazquez and LaRoche at the trading deadline. It’s not fair to only point out the deals that didn’t work out.

Don

December 14th, 2009
9:52 am

However, the question about what they got for Soriano and what they seem to be willing to take for Lowe really misses the point. As badly as they seem to be dealing with this, the point is that they sould not be dealing with it at all. They must not trade away Pitching. One or more of their potential Starters will end up being injured and/or proving to be ineffective. But even more significantly, this is the only slim chance they have of winning the Division with Bobby Cox managing — Have Pitching so far, far superior to the other teams that it overcomes his management procedures and lack thereof and his blunders and enables you to win over the long 162 game regular season schedule in spite of him. This is the way it has always been with him managing. Of course, this great, great pitching did not overcome having Cox as a manager in the short series, as evidenced by his winning only one WS in 14 opportuniites.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
9:55 am

Sonny Clusters – What in the Hell are you talking about? In fact, what are you EVER talking about? Are you able to speak English? Are you able to have a rational thought? Just wondering.

jdawg

December 14th, 2009
9:59 am

mark, i agree with you about norton. Man, that guy was clutch. I wonder how, every time, the braves were in a clutch situation old man norton was up to bat.

jdawg

December 14th, 2009
10:01 am

how much did they give Hudson?

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
10:01 am

Don – They would love to keep all the pitching if they had the $$$. How are YOU going to put together a team with the current budget if you spend it all on pitching? We do have 6 starters. If one goes down, we have options for 5th starter, including Medlin and minor leaguers. I believe KK will be better than many think, now that he is accustomed to the US and Braves.

jdawg

December 14th, 2009
10:02 am

MB Do you remember chipper saying that he would take a pay cut to get Hudson from Oakland? I wonder if he still felt that way to keep hudson

Javy Vazquez/Lopez

December 14th, 2009
10:04 am

Why is it the Braves always pursue guys that are at the end of their careers, Wagner & Saito(never heard of him) are pushing 40, who would you rather have as your closer combo, Wagner & Saito, or Soriano & Gonzo??? All are injury prone, but I’ll take the younger guys, guarantee we have bullpen problems again this year, some things never change, maybe next year when Booby is gone to the farm!

Sonny Clusters

December 14th, 2009
10:04 am

We was at the store and looked up . . . and there was Bobby Cox! He was buying some steaks and was waiting in line with us. We was going to shake hands but we remembered Bobby is a nose picker so we thought better of it. Instead, we waved and said hello. Bobby was very nice to us and then we asked about ol’ Jeff and mentioned the Dairy Queen. We think we saw a tear in Bobby’s eye about then. Jeff was a favorite of Bobby’s, right up there with Greg Norton and Keith Lockhart. We don’t know how Lockhart’s name “popped up” but it sure was appropriate to come up that way. We was always running into famous ballplayers and billionaires.

ccrider

December 14th, 2009
10:04 am

Mark.( I.) Wagner is a lefty that throws Strikes and rarely walks batters, he really replaces Gonzalez who walked too many batters. Saito effectively replaces Soriano because Wagner and Soriano will work in tandem just like Soriano and Gonzalez. Why? Look at Wagner’s Stats against the lefthanders bashers in our division. Utley, Howard, Dunn, Ibanez, Beltran and there is your answer.
(2) What if Wren offered Arbitration to Laroche, he accepted and the arbitrator ruled he was worth $8 million dollars(by the way Laroche is asking for a 3 yr. $31.5 mill contract in free agency, he wasn’t going to stay anyway) and unlike you and me Frank Wren does have to worry about the money. What if he commits to arbitration and can’t clear enough payroll. Does it turn into another Greg Maddox/ Kevin Millwood situation where we have to trade Vazquez to make budget?
(3) Simple: Lowe, while still very good, is 37 years old, makes the most money by far of the pitchers, was the 5th best starter last year and would be the 6th coming into to this season. Most of all, his salary opens up the most money to add hitters which we sorely need with the Phillies in our division. Do you really think the GM’s don’t understand the reason’s why this would be Wren’s most logical play?
(4) Diaz didn’t replace Church in rightfield, until Church got hurt.They were in a platoon situation from the get go, as was The Braves plan when they traded for him. The Trade was made for the benefit of Francoeur and team chemistry. The endless focus on Francoeur’s struggles became a distraction to the whole team. Francoeur had no trade value at the time, his stats and been bad for 2 seasons. Most pundits were amazed the Braves got anything of value for him and his contract.
(5) The Braves decisions don’t take place in a vacumn. Wren, Schuerholz, Bobby Cox and multiple scouts would be consulted before a player was traded for. Most any team in baseball would have liked Jake Peavy, the Braves made a play for him, but backed out when the price was too high. Furcal had come off a very good season(Contract Year) and was only considered, due to the inclusion of Escobar in the Peavy deal and the need for a leadoff hitter. Griffey was not the Griffey of old, but he did play better defense than Anderson, had more Home Runs, a higher OBP and only 2 less RBI’s in 100+ less at bats, so that pair would be a wash at worse.

John OTC

December 14th, 2009
10:04 am

Mark. Sometimes I agree with you 100%.

This is one of those times. People say Wren makes the right moves but has a tin ear with how to communicate. I think his plan C is usually better than his plans A abd B. I hope we keep all six starters for now. Couldn’t we always move Lowe to the bullpen and have him close if he isn’t effective as a starter? I think he will bounce back BTW. Yes, he would be an expensive closer. However, if we make the post season, who cares?

Sonny Clusters

December 14th, 2009
10:05 am

raleighbravefan, we was sad to read what you said. Are you constipated this morning?

jdawg

December 14th, 2009
10:06 am

we all know what jj kk lowe vazquez and huddy are capable of. so lets trade hanson for a hitter and lets play ball

Brian

December 14th, 2009
10:11 am

Don, the Braves needed to trade Soriano as quickly as possible so they wouldn’t have an 8 million dollar question mark over their heads while they’re trying to put together a team for next year. And I’ve got news for ya, no matter how long the Braves would have waited, they were not going to get much for him, because they had no leverage. It’s still better than not offering him arbitration, in which case they would have gotten absolutely nothing.

Lowe is a different story…I would be surprised if he was traded before Lackey signs somewhere, because Lackey runners-up will be the teams the Braves may be dealing with.

fordcobra

December 14th, 2009
10:12 am

What we needed as a closer was consistency, don’t know if Wagner will provide this or not but it was for certain the other 2 did not, when they were good they were very good but when they were’t they were awful. It is very easy to take pot shots at Wren when you have no money, job security, or anything else involved with the decisions, Monday quarterbacks…. well you know. Thanks for stirring the pot MB the hot stove is kinda cold.

jdawg

December 14th, 2009
10:14 am

a friend of mine was traded to pittsburgh in the “laroche to boston” trade. The next week in AA he threw a no hitter. Boston is gonna get a slap in the face for that move one day

jdawg

December 14th, 2009
10:16 am

david justice for right field

Brian

December 14th, 2009
10:18 am

It boggles my mind that so many people seem to be nervous about the back of the bullpen next year. Wagner has a career 2.39 ERA! Saito has a career 2.05 ERA! Soriano’s (2.92) and Gonzalez’s (2.57) ERA’s don’t compare. Yes, they’re both getting older, but where is the decline? Wagner had a 1.72 ERA and struck out 14.9 batters per nine innings after coming back last year. Saito had a 2.43 ERA, which just so happens to be much lower than Gonzalez or Soriano last year.

Both have one year deals, so it’s not like we have to worry about how they decline over the next couple of years. I guess I understand if you’re concerned about how much they’re being payed, because I think all relievers are overpaid, but I don’t see where the concern about their ability and performance comes in.

GA- The State of Mediocrity

December 14th, 2009
10:21 am

Soriano throws a 92-94 mph fastball with absolutely no movement and an average slider. There is absolutely no way you can have a closer or late innings reliever with this type “stuff.” Wagner being left handed already brings something to the table that Soriano doesn’t have plus he throws harder and has a wicked hook.

Gonzo is just too inconsistent. He has great stuff, but he’s a mental head case. A closer is not only about having dominating “stuff”, its also a mentality. Either you have it or you don’t. Gonzo doesn’t have the mentality for it. Soriano might have the mentality, but his stuff isn’t good enough for the job. I’d be very suprised to see Soriano or Gonzo closing for someone next season.

Yes its a gamble signing Wagner when he hasn’t closed a game in a while, but you also have Moylan as a back-up plan, who has closer stuff, if Wagner gets hurt again. Judging by the way he looked at the end of last season, I think he will be just fine. Just ask some of the Braves hitters that faced him up in New York before he went to Boston.

kreedham

December 14th, 2009
10:23 am

It wouldn’t be all bad to keep all 6 starters. As someone mentioned there could be an injury. I have an idea that had been mentioned by another long ago. Take Hudson or Lowe and let them start their regular start and pitch only 5 innings no matter how good they’re doing. Then let Kawakami pitch the last 4. Doesn’t build up the innings on 1 of the starters who as a result could be stronger at the end of the season. Just hoping Chipper is working out and will come back with a better year and we get somebody theat can hit.

Ramblin Wrecker

December 14th, 2009
10:26 am

All of these questions are ridiculous.

1) Soriano was expected to seek a multiyear deal. His accepting of arbitration is seen as unusual. Wagner signed a one year $7 million deal that was seen as taking less money/deal to sign where he wanted to go (to the Braves). You can’t tell me that if he had held a bidding war that he couldn’t have gotten a guaranteed two year deal somewhere. Soriano, for all the reasons you mention, should have declined arbitration and signed a multiyear deal. He just didn’t let the market develop. What Wren did was smart and calculated. What Soriano did was erratic and stupid.

2) LaRoche would have defintely taken arbitration. He could have stayed where he wanted another year (and under Cox one last time) and then taken his services on the market in 2011. But Wren didn’t want to risk having all three (Gonzalez, Soriano, and LaRoche) accept arbitration. LaRoche was the least tradeable piece of the three.

3) The desire to trade Derek Lowe has nothing to do with performance. It’s all about payroll flexibility and remaking the roster to have more offensive power.

4) The only person who deserves blame in the Jeff Francoeur situation is Jeff Francoeur. He is a hard headed kid, who refuses to adjust the way he needs to to be great. Funny that Chipper Jones once called him Andruw Jones as a jab at his stubborness. If anything the Braves kept him too long out of loyalty to the hometown kid. He basically had no value in a trade market. Francoeur will fade into obscurity after he has struggles in NY, which he will, bet on it.

5) I think Wren has done very well in his two years as GM. Afterall WREN (not Schuerholtz) acquired 4 of the 6 starting pitchers on their roster. He got Jair Jurrjens and Gorkys Hernandez for Edgar Renteria. He then acquired Javy Vasquez for a late blooming catcher prospect (who would be blocked by Brian McCann) and the aforementioned Gorkys Hernandez. He signed Lowe and Kawakami, whom both were good last year, despite their final stats. He signed Garret Anderson, who if you look at his work after May turned out to be what they hoped for, if not for that spring training calf injury might have been what they expected all year. And for goodness sake, he was able to trade the no-power Casey Kotchman for the awesome power of Adam LaRoche…straight up!!! Wren has yet to put his stamp on the offense of this team, but that’s because he had so much work to do with the pitching staff before last season. Now he’s got surplus of a commodity that is in short supply if you look around the league. So this is his offseason to remake the offense and I’d bet he’s got a few winners up his sleeve for this too.

Bill

December 14th, 2009
10:32 am

Welcome back Mark. Now why did you leave that Vick Falcon post up all damn week? Man you know how to hurt your fans.
Some good questions , Sometimes the best Trades are the ones not made.That said I still put my faith in Frank Wren doing whats best for Braves to win.

Frenchy, I’m glad he’s gone.

raleighbravefan

December 14th, 2009
10:33 am

Brian – I agree 100%

kreedham – How do we PAY 6 starters?

MitchC

December 14th, 2009
10:42 am

If it wasnt for the payroll issue, and the fact Wagner is cheaper, and we need to free up money to sign a hitter, we really could have made either Lowe or Vazquez the closer, and kept everyone we currently have. Remember, Derek did have a 40 save season at Boston. I dont know what kind of a closer Vazquez would have been, but John Smoltz had been a starter for 14 years, before he turned into a pretty good closer from 2001-2004.

If Wagner stinks, and the Braves do end up trading Lowe, FW might well regret his decisons come next July or August.

Branch Rickey

December 14th, 2009
10:53 am

Considering how Bobby Cox burns out his bullpen by July, turning the reins of the bullpen over to a 38 & 40 year-old makes zero sense to me. Good point comparing Soriano to Wagner. I’ll take the younger guy any day.

Kelly's Johnson

December 14th, 2009
10:58 am

The Braves are stuck with Derek Lowe’s contract. Nobody in their right mind will take on $45 million owed to an average pitcher at best on the downside of his career. Only Frank Wren rewards the old, over-the-hill players with the big bucks while complaining he has no money to spend on much-needed offense. BRILLIANT !

Jason

December 14th, 2009
11:00 am

Frank Wren is a joke, and the Braves become more of a joke every year. Honestly, I NEVER understand the moves the Braves make. Billy Wagner over Soriano??? Huh??? The only reason that free agent players ever consider playing in Atlanta is Bobby Cox, after this year, there will be NO reason for free agents to come to Atlanta. They have become a poorly run organization!

Biff Pocoroba

December 14th, 2009
11:00 am

If LaRoche takes off, TWO big bats will be needed to make this team competitive. I don’t see TWO big bats out there. Frank Wren is a real genius !

Bobby Cox

December 14th, 2009
11:06 am

Greg Norton can play firstbase. Norty is a real gamer. We can plug Prado in right; and bring Kelly back to play second. I like this lineup. Duh.

Don

December 14th, 2009
11:21 am

Speaking of questions about the Braves. How many times have you seen Bobby Cox do/fail to do things that violate even the most simple fundamentals of WINNING, things that no manager would do at any level of baseball. HOW many times HAVE YOU SEED BOBBY COX:
(1) Keep a player in the regular line up on and on and on after it is obvious to any knowledgable fan that he cannot produce.
(2) Keep a player at a set spot in the top part of the batting order when he is in a terrrible prolonged slump.
(3) Fail to move players up and down in the batting order based on who is hot and who is not.
(4) Keep on using a relief pitcher over and over and over when it is obvious that he is not going to be effective.
(5) Keep on using a Pinch Hitter over and over and over when it obvious that he is not going to produce.
(6) Keep a player on the bench when it is obvious that he is far, far better than on of the regulars who he likes and is playing.
(7) Fail to have his hitters work the count and put pressure on a Pitcher at a turning point in the game when it is obvious that the pitcher is out of sinc/ lost his release point etc.
(8) Allow hitters to swing at the next pitch when a pitcher is wild, walking/ hitting men – and get the pither out of trouble instead of putting more pressure on him.
(9) Fail to make the opposing starting pitcher throw a lot of pitches when the team has a weak bullpen.
(10) Overwork his bullpen to the point that it becomes ineffective.
(11) Make no adjustments in his lineup and in his batting order based on the past success or lack of success that hitters have had against a given pitcher.
(12) Make no effort whatsoever to teach, emphasize, demand that his hitters be patient, get good pitches to hit, work the count.
(13) Put no pressure on the opposing pitcher when he is in trouble or at possible key turning points in the game.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
11:23 am

You know, I think Norty is more a practicer than a gamer. But I’m often wrong.

Brian

December 14th, 2009
11:27 am

Jason, considering that Wagner is superior to Soriano in every single statistical category, I don’t understand why anyone would want Soriano over Wagner. Wagner strikes out more batters, gives up fewer hits and few home runs, has a lower ERA and a lower WHIP, and has about 350 more saves than Soriano. Soriano has walked slightly fewer batters in his career (2.8 per 9, compared to Wagner’s 3.0), but that’s it. And Soriano has a higher salary with TB, and would have had an even higher one with Atlanta.

What is your reason to preferring Soriano?

Braves73

December 14th, 2009
11:36 am

Mark, it’s hard to argue with Wren’s decisions considering the work he did last off season. He was widely critized for almost every move he made, but at the end of the day he did make the ball club better.

In regards to the bullpen decisions that have been made, I am split on the signings/releases. You have to keep in mind the Braves traditionally don’t spend big $$$ on relievers/closers. I realize they are paying the same if not more for a one year/two year rental, but they must feel they have upgraded for the short term.

Let’s give Wren the benefit of the doubt and see how this off season plays out.

Jesus

December 14th, 2009
11:37 am

I think exactly like Kenneth so I am just going to post his again:

Kenneth

December 14th, 2009
7:10 am
1. Hindsight is 20/20 Mark. The Braves and everybody else thought Soriano would not agree to arbitration. (still was the right move to offer)

2. You are right about keeping Laroche (can’t believe I agree with MB for once)

3. Which pitcher are they supposed to trade? Lowe makes the most sense because of his high salary.

4. You didn’t offer any alternative to what Wren did in trading for Church. What was he supposed to do? Francouer needed to go and it wasn’t like there was much of a market or they wouldn’t have traded him to someone in their division.

5. That’s a little harsh isn’t it. Could anyone predict that Peavy was going to have that kind of year? ‘

It wasn’t who made some bad trades that have come back to haunt this team. Those 5 players for eixera and the one with St. Louis: Wainwright for J.D. Drew…………………

(MB cheer up, we have a great team that was in contention until the last week of the season last year and that is going to be a contender again, stop seen the glass half empty)

Brian

December 14th, 2009
11:41 am

Don, how many managers besides Cox have you seen that have done the following?
1. Win over 2400 games? You’ve probably seen LaRussa, probably not old enough to know Mack or McGraw.
2. Be at least 450 games over .500 in their career? Again, probably not old enough to know McGraw or McCarthy.
3. Win 14 consecutive division titles? Pretty sure you haven’t seen anyone else there.
4. Make 15 postseason appearances? Torre’s the only other.
5. Win five pennants? There’s only four in your lifetime, or maybe only three if you’re actually 15 years old, which sometimes I do suspect.
6. Win a World Series? Less than 10 percent of the managers in MLB history have done so.
7. Maintain an average finish of 2.4? Only 9 managers with over 1000 games have done better.
8. Have players repeatedly say something like: “I can’t pass up the opportunity to play for him” or “It’s an honor to play for him”. Ever heard that one about Dusty Baker or Charlie Manuel or Gardenhire?

Sporty Black

December 14th, 2009
11:42 am

Mark you have some valid points, I think most of the opposition to your article is due to commenting with the heart and not the mind.

1. Should of kept Soriano. 10 yrs younger, very good reliever (not perfect), and WANTED to be a Brave. Even Rivera was not perfect in saves. Braves need more runs per game, period.

2. Keep LaRoche. Very good LEFT-HANDED POWER hitter. Very good defensive player. Good locker room guy. There is still reservation on the comments he made about fans a few years back; LaRoche only spoke the truth.

3. Lowe is a solid # 3-4 pitcher at this stage in his career. Note: the Braves supported him with runs, it wasn’t that Lowe was dominant. I’d rather keep Kawakami who is just as good but cheaper and go get a BIG bat.

4. Yes, wrong move. Church was known to be absolutely worthless. Francour was billed to be the savior of the Braves and still had trade value. Should of traded for a decent draft pick or minor league player.

5. Don’t know about the “worst instincts.” Wren’s job is also to generate ticket sales and merchandise revenue. Griffy would of done just that. The Braves have not had a true lead-off hitter since……Furcal. Hindsight is 20/20, but I can’t fault Wren on trying for those two.

Terry

December 14th, 2009
11:44 am

Some of the remarks on here make no sense.

We had to offer Soriano arbitration with the hope he would reject it and we would at least get a first round pick out of it. The fact that he accepted wasn’t a major setback. We were able to trade him for Chavez who has a good mid 90’s fastball, slider and changeup. Has 1 year of MLB experience, which means we have him for a couple of years before he even hits arbitration, and we don’t have to wait 3 or 4 years for him to be ready to play.
Let him sit behind Saito & Wagner and learn and he might have the stuff to be a TRUE closer.

So far as Franceour, we traded him for a box of rocks, and didn’t need the rocks anymore. The fact that Franceour should have been batting 9th and was somehow always in the 5-7 hole falls on Bobby’s shoulders. Church was never going to be the long term replacement.

Why are you even asking which starter should be traded ? The answer is Derek Lowe without question. Vazquez was better, cheaper, and would like to stay here. As soon as we find a taker for Lowe I’m sure we will look to re sign Vazquez and we have a stellar starting 5 for several years.

Vazquez, Jurrjens, Hudson, Hanson, Kawakami …. I like our chances most nights.

Dropping Lowes salary gives us more money to pick up a bat, even if all we get for Lowe is a prospect.

People are on here bashing Wren over moves that for the most part have been the right moves given the constraints placed on him. If you want to complain about how much money we have to spend blame Liberty Media, if you want to complain about Bobby Cox you can blame Cox and Terry McGuirk.

Let’s see what Wren does when Bobby finally does retire. If he even has a say in who we hire.

I think he did a GREAT job in rebuilding our pitching staff last year, now lets see what he does to bring in some offense without gutting the minors like Shuerholtz did.

Joshhh...

December 14th, 2009
11:48 am

Wow thanks for just piling on questions Mark

You did no good by writing this article, all you did was stir up the emotions of already tender fans…

Did you really want to keep Soriano? A guy who definitely didn’t play with everything he had in every situation last year & who asked to be traded?

You think he’d play like a winner if he asked to be traded?

Frenchy is gone so get over it, my goodness Francoeur couldn’t do anything in the past 3 seasons there was no reason to keep him. Some times someone needs to make the hard decisions.

Oh and by the way you never know what Furcal, Peavy, or Griffey would’ve done in Atlanta. Have you not heard of “change of scenery?”

The only things that I couple possibly agree with you on this is keeping Derek Lowe (although we need a money bat) and keeping LaRoche.

But for the most part, I think you let your emotions get the best of you when you wrote this one…

Don

December 14th, 2009
11:53 am

Point is, his great Pitching staff that was so far, far superior to the other teams overcame his management procedures and lack thereof and enabled him to win over the long 162 game schedule. Even this pitching that was one of the best staffs in baseball history did not enable his management to win in the short series against the best teams. As you pointed out, he won ONE WS – and that was in only 14 opportunities (and even that required Glavine to pitch a shutout). This is the true measure of his management skills. (And please, don’t say that the Post Season is a flip of a coin – Even if this were true, a coin flip does not come up in your favor once in 14 times). He is a player who basically lets the players do what they want (as long as they keep their nose clean) and gives them little instruction or demands – thus having a team that has a good team spirit – and enabled him to win with a pitching staff that overcame his management procedures.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
11:53 am

I agree — and I’ve written many times — that Wren did great work rebuilding the rotation. And I give him great credit for his Plan B’s. I’m just wondering why his Plan A’s don’t seem to work very well.

Don

December 14th, 2009
12:02 pm

Yes, everyone knows that Bobby Cox is under contract for 2010 and that it is not going to change. But the point is – that it COULD be very simple to change this – pay him off and release him – and nothing (no trade for players, no signing of players) would help the team nearly as much as this. Frank Wren has the worst job in baseball – the RESPONSIBILITY to build a winner – without the AUTHORITY to fire Bobby Cox. I realize that to talk about this is to beat a dead horse. But it is so useless to talk about possible trades and possible signings when this is the most significant problem — to worry about repairing small holes in the sales when there is a huge hole in the bottom of the boat.

Brian

December 14th, 2009
12:03 pm

We’ll never know for sure, obviously, but I am almost certain there would have never been the great pitching staff you’re referring to without Bobby Cox. Glavine, Justice, and Gant were developed under his watch, he traded for Smoltz, drafted Chipper Jones. You think Maddux would have ever been a Brave if Cox hadn’t dragged the Braves from worst to first in 1991 and 1992? Do you really think Cox being there did not have a positive effect on their performance that made them one of the best pitching staffs in history?

Ultimately the players win and lose the games. Managers manage personalities always, and sometimes games as well. But if you’re looking for a manager that has done more than Bobby Cox, then I think you’re going to be waiting a while.

Jim H.

December 14th, 2009
12:06 pm

Mark, you could just read DOBs columns and get the answers to your questions, but anyway….

1.) Wagner is a much more established closer and has been much more consistent throughout his career. 38 isnt that old for a closer, especially one who stays fit, which I believe Wagner does. TJ surgery is routine these days, and he already proved he could still pitch. There were I believe also some questions about Soriano’s work ethic that came into play.

2.) LaRoche has always been a poor early season hitter (usually doesnt get it together until after the all star break) and the Braves didn’t think he is worth the money he would get in arbitration……a full seasons pay for a half season of good production.

3.) Its all about getting his Lowe’s salary off the payroll. Its not about his abilities. They need that money for other uses. We ain’t the Yankees. If we were I’m sure they would keep him.

4.) Can’t say I disagree with you about that one. They dumped Frenchy for not much in return. I still look for him to cool off with the Mets though.

5.) He rebuilt the Braves pitching staff from very medicre to very good in one offseason (with a limited payroll). He’ll work on the offense this off season. He has retained our top prospects. I think he’s doing a good job.

3.

Braves Fan Since "80

December 14th, 2009
12:12 pm

I just watched baseball since my playing days ended in high school so I try not to play manager and general manager….I think most people just sit back and spout off about the impossible….. like trade Kelly Johson and Greeg Norton a big hitting first baseman….but you have hit the point on this……… Why would not have Wren said we will have the best 7, 8, and 9th innings and after June we can trade a stopper to fill needs….he acted desparate…. How will you get a fair shake looking to dump a pitcher and cash….Laroche, Kelly Johnson, Francouer and Soriano will have great years and Wagner and Saito will be mediocre. We will get a washed up outfielder/first baseman.

Chipper , no help….We are putting together a team that could have won last year….the phillies are getting better… the braves are hoping……

John Tucker

December 14th, 2009
12:18 pm

One last thing, bradley.

Laroche is notorious for not hitting his weight in April, May and June and coming on strong the last half, whichb he did again last year.

Braves need consistent offense. No more streaky hitters who feast on weak pitching or are streaky. Let’s get an every day hitter like Nady or Adrian Gonzalez to play first for the Braves.

Fischerking04

December 14th, 2009
12:18 pm

Hmm, this entire piece is completely negative.

Brian

December 14th, 2009
12:21 pm

Let’s face it…the Phillies are going to be the favorites to win the NL East no matter who the Braves pick up this offseason. Doesn’t mean it’s a guarantee, but let’s also see how we look compared to Colorado and San Francisco, both of whom narrowly outlasted the Braves for the wild card last year. So far neither of them has shown any marked improvement. In the Rockies’ case, they’re losing a 15-game winner from last year in Marquis. The Giants seem to be in on a lot of names, but still haven’t improved their anemic offense.

Ricky Ricardo

December 14th, 2009
12:23 pm

Mark, you got some ’splainin’ to do!!

Ed

December 14th, 2009
12:27 pm

DO NOT TRADE VAZQUEZ, OUR BEST PITCHER.

larocheisabeast

December 14th, 2009
12:33 pm

has anyone else noticed that every single article mark bradley writes is always hindsight, without exception? he never fails to point out the negative aspect of every possible situation involving the braves management of their franchise, AFTER it has already happened. congratulations mark, on monday morning, arm-chair quarterbacking. you are the best.

MSC OFF

December 14th, 2009
12:34 pm

Mark – I agree with everything but trading LOWE. I think it’s a good idead to shed the payroll and cut their losses. I don’t understand why they didn’t offer Soriano a multi year deal and lock him up. Having a quality closer has been there demise since A. Pena! I have no confidence that they are going to get one BIG Bat, when truth is they need 2 at the very least. Discouraging is the word and another year missing the playoffs is on its way!

Mekons

December 14th, 2009
12:34 pm

A year from now, we might well be saying, “You know, they should’ve just kept the closer they had.”

Except there was no way we could retain either Soriano or Gonzo. Both were asking for a long-term, high-dollar contract. The only reason Soriano accepted arbitration was that we already had Wagner and therefore weren’t going to negotiate with him. When we offered arbitration, we gave him a guaranteed year and he is free now to seek an extension with Tampa Bay or get free agency again next year.

There was no way he was going to close for us this year. If we hadn’t signed Wagner, we would have been left with nothing. I don’t know about you, but the idea of a Medlen/Moylan combo as closer gave me the cold sweats.

Wagner may not have had saves last year, primarily because he was pitching the 8th in Boston, but he looked as good as ever. He might have even picked up a couple of MPH.

As for Lowe, I don’t know what to do with him. It’s not that I want him traded, but there’s simply one too many starters lurking around. We will probably have to accept a mediocre prospect or two and eat some of his salary. But consider that last year, we were looking at a rotation of JJ and nothing else. There was no guarantee that Hanson was going to pan out (although without the signings, he would have started the season in Atlanta), Hudson was out for most of the year, Smoltz was injured and as it turned out, barely adequate as a starter, etc.

Wren was brilliant in picking up Javy, KK, and Lowe. The only problem was that our offense was horrid during the first half. Once we subtracted Frenchy and got playing time for Prado, and swapped out Kotchman for LaRoche, everything improved dramatically.

As for LaRoche, he wants several years and a lot of money. And probably a no-trade clause. Obviously, we have Freeman coming along, and we can find a decent bat to stick at 1B for a year. We’ll lose defense, but I don’t think we want to invest $25 million or more for Adam’s defense and second half. If we could get him for a year, I’d love to see him back, but I don’t think that’s possible.

Datominator

December 14th, 2009
12:37 pm

O sure, with the benefit of hindsight you can say how lucky we were we didn’t land some of those guys he tried to get – Griffey, Furcal, et al. But these same yokels talking about how terrible Wren was for trying to get these guys were the same ones screaming last year about how terrible he was for NOT getting these guys. There have been Wren haters from day one, and nothing he does will change that – if the Braves win the World Series this year they’ll be talking about how they did so DESPITE Wren – the guy can’t win.

Reid Adair

December 14th, 2009
12:40 pm

I fail to understand what is being accomplished by signing Billy Wagner and Takashi Saito to replace Rafael Soriano and Mike Gonzalez – unless it’s strictly a money situation.

I am not convinced that these two new additions are an improvement over the individuals they are replacing.

Then again, this is Frank Wren that we are talking about.

ed simmons

December 14th, 2009
12:44 pm

Should have kept Jeff and got a new hitting coach.

Vol_In_Ohio

December 14th, 2009
12:53 pm

I guess if we had kept Soriano and not signed Wagner we would be be two draft picks ahead of where we are now. Both will perform well at the start – it will be all about the injuries and how the Pirates/Rays reliever does I guess.

I wonder if Furcal would have done a lot better if he had played in Atlanta vs. LA. That might have been part of Wren’s thinking. I can’t explain going after Griffey – he would have been subpar anywhere. I’m pretty sure we’d all like to have Peavy on the 2010 roster.

Art Vandalay

December 14th, 2009
12:57 pm

Potential line up

McClouth-CF
Martin Prado-2B
Chipper Jones-3B
Brian McCann-C
Adam LaRoche/Xavier Nady/Someone else-1B
Yunel Escobar-SS
Mike Cameron/Jason Heyward-RF
Matt Diaz-LF
No matter how you want to analyze that ALL the potential answers at the question positions are better than what they started with last year. PLUS the new players will at best be the 5th and 7th hitters 1-4 is set in stone and Matt Diaz and Yunel Escobar will be somewhere between 6-8, Xavier Nady, Nick Swisher, Mike Cameron, Jason Heyward who ever the RF may be will have to be a 7th hitter most likely any one of those is more than serviceable in that spot.

Gary

December 14th, 2009
12:58 pm

Reid Adair its simple: Mike Gonzalez is going to get a 3-4 year deal on the open market for much more than the 2.5-3 million he made last year and oh yeah his agent is Boras so he could possibly net more. Rafael Soriano in his three seasons in Atlanta had one good year. The rest of the time he was ineffective or injured. Billy Wagner is one of the greatest closers of the last 12-15 years. He had a surgery that is now considered routine and returned back from that procedure with stuff that looks better than before he left. Saito is a very good setup man who did wonders when he was with the Dodgers. In Boston he either didn’t fit in with the team or not a fan of the AL, but his numbers were still solid. The Braves gave Wagner and Saito $10 million compared to the nearly (if not more) $20 million that Gonzalez and Soriano would have fetched this season. They are basically keeping the back end of the bullpen production at or slightly above last season’s duo.

For all the talk about Gonzo and Soriano, many forget that both were inconsistent throughout the year. Gonzo was either lights out or making the game a little interesting towards the end. Soriano was very good in the beginning, but got badly streaky come August. I don’t think the Braves are going to regret these moves one bit.

Art Vandalay

December 14th, 2009
1:00 pm

look at how far they have come from

Yunel Escobar
Kelly Johnson
Chipper Jones
Brian McCann
Garrett Anderson
Jeff Francoeur
Jordan Schaffer
Casey Kotchman

Skeezix

December 14th, 2009
1:01 pm

Mark: 1. I am glad we have Wagner; I think he’ll be fine.
2. I wish we had traded Lowe and kept Soriano. A key question for Wren is- why was he surprised when Soriano accepted arbitration? …and what with that 4.5+ ERA reliever he got back in the trade?
3. As I’ve said before, Wren is over his head, has been from the beginning, and should be demoted to equipment manager.

Art Vandalay

December 14th, 2009
1:03 pm

Plus the opening day rotation of

Vazquez,Hudson,Jurrjens,Hanson,Kawakami

Looks much better than last year’s :Lowe,Vazquez,Jurrjens,Kawakami,Glavine

The Big Dawg Has Eaten

December 14th, 2009
1:04 pm

((((( 30-24 )))))

Sid Slides In

December 14th, 2009
1:04 pm

1. You have to get rid of Lowe because you have six starting pitchers and need to cut salary. Of course Vazquez is the more appealing option, but was also our best starter down the stretch last season and younger than Lowe. While getting rid of Kenshin Kawakami would be nice, it does not releive the salary the braves need to so they can acquire a bat… therefor, Lowe is the one they need to move.

2. I like Wagner and think he will be good, but am second guessing getting rid of Soriano. The one that really worries me here is Saito who’s “power arm” is 40 years old and has a 93 mph fastball at best… this is going to bite us.

3. I agree with the Braves not signing LaRoche and personally do not want him back. For the Braves to be productive next season it is imperative they get off to a hot start; and as Laroche’s numbers show, he is one of the worst 1st half players in baseball. He was a great pickup for the 2nd half of last season, but will be nonexistent until June next year (need we all remember the 2005 season).

4. It would be nice to see the braves move chipper to 1st (I love the guy, but he has now turned into a defensive liability… close to the top in errors). Move Prado to 3rd and sign Orlando Hudson. Easier said than done I know, but it gives the Braves a guy that can hit in the leadoff spot (McLouth strikes out waaaaay to much), is a switch hitter, and has speed (something we need a lot more of). He wouldn’t be the power hitter they are looking for, but he can put them in run producing situations and he is only 30. Xavier Nady and Nick Swisher will be reminiscent of Ryan Klesko and Ken Caminiti (.230 with 25 hr and 75 rbi’s… could def help, but you’re looking at over 130 k’s)

KennyP

December 14th, 2009
1:04 pm

My lord, this is the most hateful article i have read in a long time! You are becoming a bitter man, MB. Can we not look at how the Braves did in the second half last season and try to see the glass half full? Wren had alot of critics this time last year and shut them all up by the end of the year, lets give him some slack here.

ChillyMutt

December 14th, 2009
1:06 pm

Frank Wren has shown the unique ability to consistently choose the wrong direction at any baseball crossroad. Lowes huge contract, Chipper’s extension, leaving Schafer in the majors WAY too long … Glavine, Smoltz – not that they should have been retained but the way in which they were let go. The Furcal debacle….Francour …. the Kelly John experiment…..

Art Vandalay

December 14th, 2009
1:09 pm

There really is not a power hitter available that fits the Braves needs, I like the Orlando Hudson idea. You have Orlando Hudson, Nate McClouth for speed and steals. Hudson, Escobar, Prado, Diaz can all deliver the timely hits for RBIs and Chipper and McCann and possibly Heyward while not 40 HR guys can provide the pop when needed.

Kentavo

December 14th, 2009
1:11 pm

J. Chavez led Buccos in appearances last year – he will be Cox’s mule to wear out with 80-plus appearances this year.
Can’t you just wait when Wagner is trotted out in a blow-out game “to get some work?”

NortonHearsA..Whoosh

December 14th, 2009
1:13 pm

If you can trade a $15 salary like Lowe’s (maybe the Braves wil have to chip in $2-3mil) for an emerging star like second baseman Jose Lopez with the Mariners or a player in his prime like LF Juan Rivera, then you make that move. Then fill in the pieces with short term free agents or a two year offer to LaRoche or N. Johnson, If you acquire Lopez, move Prado to first, sign a FA left fielder, and platoon Heyward/Diaz in RF. If you acquire Rivera, add LaRoche for a heavy 2 year deal and stay with same platoon.

tyger

December 14th, 2009
1:13 pm

If you aint talkin Barry Bonds, you aint talkin bout sht!

Glynn

December 14th, 2009
1:14 pm

Bring back LaRoche!

This is a no brainer, we need a bat, we need a first basemen. I hope Freddie Freemen is a great player, but lets not count on that too much. LaRoche could start for 3 years and Freemen would still only be 22 (maybe 23, im not sure).

njbraves

December 14th, 2009
1:19 pm

Bradley….You’re lost. Leave the baseball talk to DOB, because you are clueless.

GermanBravesFan

December 14th, 2009
1:23 pm

Are Don and Robert twins? Gets kinda tiring to read their rants about how bad Bobby Cox is. Without him, the Braves STILL would not be worth talking about – like they were before 1991!

Frank Robinson (Rockmart)

December 14th, 2009
1:28 pm

1. Because the older reliever’s career track record for injuries and performance is much better than Soriano’s. 2009 is a very small sample size.
2. Because Soriano was one of the top 3 relievers on the market, and not many expected him to accept arbitration. Laroche is not exactly on the top of everyone’s chart of top hitting free agents. If he accepts arbitration Wren has less flexibility for roster construction. Laroche can still sign with the Braves, but Wren now has more leverage in salary negotiation.
3. I think if there were “utter desperation” to trade him, he’d be gone. Looks like Wren is waiting out the market to bring his or Vazquez’ value even higher.
4. Not necessarily. Let’s give it more than two months to see how Francouer pans out. Also, what exactly would one have expected Wren to get for him? We were lucky to get more than a bag of balls for “The Natural”.
5. Does Wren have bad instints because he walked away from the 3 that you mentioned? Your question confuses me. Seems to me he did one hell of a job overhauling the roster last year, and I like (but don’t love) the moves he’s made so far.

This “article” is poorly thought out, and unnecessarily paints a negative picture of one of the better executives in the game over the past two seasons.

timthebrave

December 14th, 2009
1:32 pm

The best move he has made is not resigning Norton. That’s a 2-3 game upgrade right there.

BraveMan

December 14th, 2009
1:32 pm

My issue with Wren is that he talks about player negotiations, signings, trades, etc. through the media then looks stupid when things do not work out. Not as credible nor respected like Cox, Kasten and Schuerholz have been over the years in player acquisitions!!

WE NEED OFFENSE – PITCHING IS FINE – SPEND THE COIN ON OFFENSE!!

Stumpknocker

December 14th, 2009
1:33 pm

Some of you Cox lovers on here remind me of Dawg fans. Your quick to quote history to strengthen your point of view. But not taking into account the historian is running out of gas. Cox has, over the past couple of years, been responsible for (directly or indirectly) blowing huge leads in games that the Braves should have won easily. That figure comes to roughly 10 games per season. Losing games in such a fashion is demoralizing to the team effort and should be kept to a bare minimum. Had the Braves won the majority of those “blown games”, they would have made the post season.

Larry

December 14th, 2009
1:34 pm

Question 6: Who’s excited about renewing their season tickets after the signing of two geriatric pitchers and getting to watch the major leagues all time losing postseason manager (1-14 in the last game of the postseason) sitting in the dugout again while mining his right nostril with his left thumb for 162 games in 2010?

Brad

December 14th, 2009
1:34 pm

Wren made the decision to cut bait with Smoltz and Glavine — two of the best moves that allowed the Braves to compete in 2009. I don’t think that Scherholtz could have made the same decision

timthebrave

December 14th, 2009
1:41 pm

Larry, I am excited about watching Braves this year and every year for that matter. I think we have the pitching to compete right now. I want to see Heyward and Freeman play but would like to sign Laroche for a year just in case. I don’t think all the blame goes to the manager. In most of the big blown leads he switches pitchers 3 or 4 times and nobody pitches effectively. The blame has to go to the pitchers in games like that. In one run losses where Norton got to hit later in the season the blame can go to bobby. JMO. Go Braves

Ray

December 14th, 2009
1:46 pm

This is the lack of genius of Frank Wren. I just don’t understand his reasoning at all!!

Herschel Talker

December 14th, 2009
1:54 pm

Brian at 9:35am -

All good points. But should we be comparing the current Billy Wagner to the Billy Wagner you’re citing, who was younger and had not had TJ surgery? All things being equal, yes his numbers are better than those of Soriano. However, Wagner is much older and has had TJ surgery, and thus I’d rather pay Soriano $7MM to close rather than Wagner.

Really

December 14th, 2009
1:56 pm

Wren going public with the, “no problem we will trade him within 24 hours” response to Soriano’s acceptance of arbitration seemed slightly bizzare. Why go public that you are desperate to trade anyone with value? Didn’t they get rid of Church to clear roster space for RS? Was his entire $7MM coming due last week?

Mark Bradley...

December 14th, 2009
2:21 pm

is an idiot!!!

Brian

December 14th, 2009
2:23 pm

Herschel, all we have to work with on Wagner after the surgery is what he did with Boston. It’s a small sample size, but he was extremely good. 14.9 K’s per 9 innings and a 1.72 ERA…the numbers pop out. There is a level of uncertainty due to the surgery, but I’d rather have a guy like Wagner who was consistent and great until one major injury than a guy like Soriano who does three trips onto the DL a year.

A TRAUG

December 14th, 2009
2:25 pm

Soriano does not have the fire that is needed to be a consistent closer in our division. I watched all 162 games last season and my father had the privilege of watching about 10 games. In all 10 games, either Soriano or Gonzalez gave up the lead. LaRoche is an average player who was playing for a contract in the 2nd Half of the season and will be overpaid in another uniform. Also, the only reason we are trying like hell to trade Lowe is because he is a much better pitcher than John Lackey, who is commanding in the range of 18-20 million per year. Whatever Wren does decide to do, let us all hope that he does not give up prospects for a “one and done” guy. Examples. J.D. Drew his name on the Disabled List for Adam Wainright. Mark Texeira: Traded 4 prospects who are all competing for the Rangers for a guy that we rented for one year, then traded to the Angels for Kasey Kotchman, then traded him to the Red Sox for Adam LaRoche, who is now a Free Agent.

Clay

December 14th, 2009
2:25 pm

The criticism of Frank Wren is a little over the top. Given what Tampa Bay signed Soriano for, yes, I’d rather have him. But I assume he thought the market for Soriano would be better. And now you’re criticizing him for going after Jake Peavy? Come on. Peavy got hurt, but you have the benefit of hindsight here. Everyone would have been psyched to have Peavy at the time. As for Garret Anderson being better than Ken Griffey, I just beg to differ. Griffey only hit .214, but he had an OBP of .324 and a slugging percentage of .411 (superior to Garret’s .303 (ouch) and .401) with 19 HR to Garret’s 13. As old as Griffey is, I have a hard time believing he could have been much worse defensively, either. Neither were great shakes, but Garret Anderson was hardly a big benefit this year.

Justin from NM

December 14th, 2009
2:26 pm

Looks like Lackey is close to going to the Sox. Does this mean Lowe to the Angels? What would it take to get Juan Rivera from them????

matty ice

December 14th, 2009
2:26 pm

I really have to believe you know the answers to those questions and understand baseball a little bit more than you just let on. If not, wow, it’s a shame. I really hope this is just you looking for readers and trying to fuel the fires of the part of the fan base than is less than totally knowledgeable. I sincerely hope you’re not actually among that group, because this article makes it seem like you are.

Brian

December 14th, 2009
2:29 pm

This doesn’t really add anything to the discussion that hasn’t already been said, but among all pitchers in MLB history with at least 800 innings pitched, Wagner is second in adjusted ERA (ERA relative to the league, ballpark adjusted):

1. Mariano Rivera, 202 (200 basically means an ERA half the league average)
2. Billy Wagner, 182
3. Pedro Martinez, 154
4. Lefty Grove, 148
5. Walter Johnson, 147
Trevor Hoffman, 147

Brian

December 14th, 2009
2:31 pm

Justin, my opinion is that since Juan Rivera is a productive player and doesn’t have a huge contract, the Angels aren’t going to be desperate to trade him, despite their outfield depth. But if the Braves eat some of Lowe’s contract and/or throw in a prospect, it could possibly get done. If Lackey goes to Boston, Wren will give the Angels a call, for sure.

Justin from NM

December 14th, 2009
2:38 pm

Brian, that’s what I was thinking too. Fingers crossed. I really hope FW doesn’t do something like swap Lowe for Matthews Jr. I was worried that he might try and swap Lowe for Milton Bradley.

Bring Me the Head of Deforest Kelley

December 14th, 2009
2:42 pm

Agree completely with the Soriano/Wagner question and statements. Soriano may not have been perfect, but I’ll take someone like him, who delivers 90% of the time in the closer role, than spending the same amount of money on the big question mark that is Wagner. Wagner has a lot more downside, with not much upside over Soriano.

Disagree with the idea that Lowe is not the starter the Braves should be trying to trade. Sure, he may have won 15 games last year, but do you think he’ll win as many in 2010. I sure don’t. His ERA is a full run higher than our next worst starter (Kawakami – who pitched well in some big matchups last season). Bradley should have restated his question here as “why re-sign Tim Hudson when there are already 3 solid + 2 serviceable pitchers in the rotation?” This is the bigger question mark, which is now necessitating Lowe (or someone else) be moved.

Joshua

December 14th, 2009
2:44 pm

With one of the best run differentials in all the majors last year, every one of you who keeps saying “we need a bat” is just dumb. We need to resign roachy and that is about it. I say keep Lowe and let Kawakami pitch from the pen. Then you got Moylan, Saito & Wagner to setup and close, and you got a legit starter if someone gets injured. WE DO NOT HAVE TO HAVE A BAT. Look at 14 consecutive division titles and see how many times we score more than 735 runs (what we had last year). You will find it was not many.

willie martinez

December 14th, 2009
2:44 pm

do the braves have an opening for defensive coordinator?

Justin from NM

December 14th, 2009
2:48 pm

You’re not going to pay Kawakami $7-8mil a year to pitch from the pen when you have Kris Medlen available for the same role, at 1/10th the salary….

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
2:49 pm

If you listen to the folks on here, Coach Willie, they should.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
2:55 pm

And I’m afraid some of you have misinterpreted my answer to No. 4. My point is that Wren did not mess up the Francoeur trade — because it wasn’t so much a a trade as a jettisoning.

Homer

December 14th, 2009
3:02 pm

As If

December 14th, 2009
3:10 pm

All I can do is laugh out loud at ANYONE who thinks that the Braves were hasty in trading Francoeur! It has been obvious for at least a couple of years that Francoeur was a losing project in Atlanta. Frenchy still looks like a wild duck looking for a place to S**T when he swings the bat. He’s fundamentally flawed in his swing. For him to be successful, his timing has to be perfect. He has no margin for error. He was nothing but timing error his last two years with the Braves. Maybe he will thrive somewhere else but I’m glad someone else is taking that gamble.

Kelly Johnson on the other hand looked fundamentally sound with the bat. Nice swing….nice pop…….questionable head. I realize many have mentioned KJs wrist problems but even when healthy, he was the picture of streaky. Blazing hot or cold as ice. I would rather have unspectacularly solid, day in and day out. Those guys get you to the post season. Someone who is hitting .500 for 3 weeks while everyone else on the team is hot as well, ain’t gonna help you when they hit .050 in the next 3 weeks.

In my opinion, cutting ties with Frenchy and KJ finally sets the Braves up to try and build a winning club based on performance rather than potential. All that 2005 did was make the Braves waaaay too patient with the young players they had. As long as those ties to “potential” stayed with the club… someone would want to be inserting them in the lineup.

Good riddance!

74 Dawg

December 14th, 2009
3:12 pm

Welcome back Mark. You answered your own questions. Frenchy was addition by subtraction. But what if they had just released him? At least he might not now be in NY or our division.

FrankieLee

December 14th, 2009
3:25 pm

Hubbard can play second.

hawesg

December 14th, 2009
3:28 pm

I have only one question:

Why does the AJC let Bradley write about baseball?

Answers?

Soriano gets hurt a lot, Lowe frees up salary space, Church is another guy who’s always hurt, but not having Frenchy is addition by subtraction.

If Bradley were a music critic, he’d wonder why the music was so quiet before the concert started.

Ted M

December 14th, 2009
3:35 pm

I agree with everything Don said but I think he forgot to include how Cox always takes our starter out after the 6th inning no matter how hot he is.

Cox does less with more, his records are only because he has had a whole lot of more until recently.

Keeping Lowe into the season doesn’t mean you pay for his entire contract. Trade him for a bunch of prospects when someone is desperate for a starter.

And don’t forget the Red Sox began last season w/7 starters and ended up needing more by the break.

Ted M

December 14th, 2009
3:41 pm

Jordan Schaffer is going to be a great hitter and baseball player 2011. I hope he is still w/the Brave.

Ted M

December 14th, 2009
3:44 pm

More predictions from Ted…Chipper will play less then 50 games in 2010.

Erik

December 14th, 2009
3:54 pm

Bradley you have no idea what you are talking about. Your first point is a valid one but you missed the BIGGEST drawback of signing Wagner over Soriano…. The Braves have lost the 17th overall pick in next years draft. I think Wagner will pitch well this season and be a great closer but I think Soriano would be on a similar level and we would still have our 1st round pick. As for the Age comparison it really bears little point in the discussion. We are talking about 1 yr guaranteed deal which lessens the risk. BUT BOTH PLAYERS ARE HUGE INJURY RISKS!!!!
Soriano has a long history of major injuries which makes him as much of a risk as Wagner. As you imply Wagner could get hurt while Soriano stays healthy but there is no way to know which one will get hurt. Hell they could both get hurt. Its a coin toss.

As for your second point…. I actually like everything you have to say here.

What really makes me mad are your 3rd, 4th, and 5th points.

First Lowe as you said had an off year last year and that does not mean he will repeat but we do owe him 45M over the next 3 seasons. There is no doubt the Braves needed him last year and in order to obtain him we had to be willing to offer 4/60M, so we did. Now we are fortunate enough to have had several things go our way and no longer wish to be teathered to a 36 yr old(turns 37 June 1) pitcher taking up roughly 15-20% of our budget for the next 3 years. You should know as O’Brien and every other Baseball beat writer that the Braves don’t expect to get a return of significance. This is a SALARY DUMP. In Fact I dont believe Wren or any other official has said on the record that they want to deal Lowe. They have said they want to deal a SP and speculation, rumors, and off the record conversations have led writers to believe that they are shopping Lowe and Lowe alone.

Your 4th point… The Francouer Trade was never about getting a great player back. It was a PR and Finacially motivated decision. The braves needed to get rid of Frenchy while they could get something back. He was struggling and not responding to help from within the organization. The Braves needed to have something to show the fans that they got for Frenchy. Because if they hadnt traded him then they very well could have non tendered him yesterday and faced the full wrath and fury of Braves Nation. Now they are 3-5M lighter than they would have been and are free to give Heyward a shot and spend that money on a hitter that fits in our lineup rather than Frnchy who was a offensive liability at times.

Finally you can talk about Wren’s “instincts” all you want but at the end of the day he put a team out there that competed until the end and exceeded expectations.

This article is not well thought through and what makes it worse is that since you, a man of credibility has written it, people who are not as familiar with the Braves as others will cite it as fact.

BT

December 14th, 2009
3:54 pm

Soriano gave up a couple critical home runs late last season and now he’s no longer a brave. I don’t get it. For the same money you must keep Soriano over Wagner. Both have zipper arms. What the hell, go with the younger arm.

I’m looking forward to having a coach that demands more from his players. This team needs a new GM, new coach and players with toughness.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
3:57 pm

Erik, you basically recited my answer to No. 4 back to me.

Will

December 14th, 2009
4:02 pm

The braves are so old that they are moving their spring facilities to The Villages- america’s favorite hometown……..

Bobby P

December 14th, 2009
4:03 pm

Two questions ?
MB is anybody paying you to play General Manager ?
Are you a crotchety old man?

We nearly got to postseason with Wrens moves fool.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
4:03 pm

Jon Heyman of SI.com reports Roy Halladay will be traded to Philadelphia. Good news, though: The Phillies will give up Cliff Lee to get him.

Justin from NM

December 14th, 2009
4:06 pm

Well, Lackey and the BoSox have a deal. 5 years $85mil. Time to get on the horn with the Yankees, Angels and Mariners about Lowe!

fsugolf

December 14th, 2009
4:08 pm

you in the hell are the braves lookin at for offence antone know

fsugolf

December 14th, 2009
4:09 pm

who in the hell are the braves lookin at for offence anyone know of any rumors

Justin from NM

December 14th, 2009
4:09 pm

Angels are close to signing Matsui to be their DH. They have 5 OFs on their roster right now, not counting Matsui….

nique

December 14th, 2009
4:10 pm

excellent points

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
4:10 pm

Usual suspects, fsugolf: Mark DeRosa. Xavier Nady. Jermaine Dye. And Marlon Byrd's name seems to be popping up.

No. Ga. bob

December 14th, 2009
4:11 pm

In my lifetime I discovered one constant…people who know nothing try to speak the most & fastest so no one will notice.
I have never seen as many bloggers that give the impression that they know more than GM’s and professional coaches. Most can’t even spell.
The major reason the Braves suck is they’re stuck with the name ATLANTA. (just like the Falcons). When they become a GEORGIA TEAM then good things might happen.

Mark Bradley's Fan Club

December 14th, 2009
4:12 pm

Wow, Philly gets rid of their best starter– thank goodness Lee is gone!

It seems clear that the Braves don’t have interest in LaRoche– that’s not to say they wouldn’t want to have him, but it looks like they figure they couldn’t get him without signing him to a longer deal than they feel comfortable doing with Freeman waiting in the wings and probably for more money than they want to pay. That might or might not be the right move for the long-term, but for the short-term, that means we’re left with a big hole at first base.

And if Wren does what everyone thinks he will, that is, (a) trade Lowe in basically a salary dump, and (b) sign a kind of middling veteran player in the outfield, how is this team better? Basically, it’s the same team minus Lowe and LaRoche. The loss of a power-hitting firstbaseman is the biggest subtraction, it seems to me. I’d actually give the Braves pretty good odds of winning the division put together as they were by the end of the year– e.g., Shafer, Francoeur, and Kelly out of the lineup and Hanson pitching every 5th day. That group produced a very nice record.

Take a hitter out of there, though… and I don’t know that that team is going to succeed– they’ll win some, but probably not get in the playoffs. Just like this year.

fordcobra

December 14th, 2009
4:15 pm

If they trade Lowe the Braves will pony up a portion of the 45 mil to get it done. This season is done let’s get behind what ever decisions are made and be True Braves Fans. Be positive not so Negative.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to All

Mark Bradley's Fan Club

December 14th, 2009
4:17 pm

(following up on my post of 4:12)… which is why I think the Braves should trade Vasquez for (hopefully) a big(ish) bopper. Vasquez is coming off one of his best years ever. For players who have played for a few years, numbers tend to trend to the mean. My guess is that Vasquez’s numbers won’t be as good next year. His trade value is huge right now. (Same argument applies to Lowe: he’s coming off one of his worst years; his numbers will probably trend to the mean, meaning they’ll get better). This team has potential for greater improvement by getting a big bat in exchange for Vasquez.

Of course, if Hudson weren’t ready to come into the rotation, my view might be different…

turnin2

December 14th, 2009
4:17 pm

Losing DLowe will be a huge mistake – he is adamant about making 2010 a comeback year. He’s the first to say he let Atlanta down and wants to make up for it. Whomever gets him will have quite the ACE…

jake

December 14th, 2009
4:18 pm

Point you neglected about Lowe: since when is having too much starting pitching a problem? Injuries are so commonplace among pitchers, especially the way Cox over-uses relievers. Soriano was excellent when rested, but Cox wore him down they way he has so many others in the past.

If I’m Wren, I hold on to every arm I’ve got until Cox is kicking manure in north Georgia. Put Kawakami in the pen (a Saito-in-waiting?) and look for a bat without giving up pitching or prospects. You know, the old fashioned way.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
4:18 pm

Didn’t know I had a fan club. I’m shocked and amazed at this development. But I wouldn’t count on overflow membership.

And here’s the part I don’t understand about Lowe: The Braves signed him thinking he’d be their ace for the next few years. Now they’re acting as if he stunk out the joint. Which he didn’t. He didn’t have a great season, but he won 15 games. Same, I might note, as Javier Vazquez. (Although with a much higher ERA.)

Mark Bradley's Fan Club

December 14th, 2009
4:23 pm

That’s right, Mark–astute observation re: the Braves’ long-term investment in Lowe. There’s a reason why you have a fan club!

Actually, I think that Wren understands all of this– I remember all of us speculating about the players he was going after last fall/winter and being totally wrong more often than not when he actually made a move.

At least… I’ve GOT to believe that he understands all of this… otherwise, I have visions of John Koncak dancing through my head.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
4:23 pm

JASon

December 14th, 2009
4:32 pm

Soriano screwed us over last season. He single-handedly cost us a wild card spot.

Think of how ridiculous the argument is that Soriano wasn’t well rested. He only pitches one inning a game!

Kenneth Simpson

December 14th, 2009
4:33 pm

The way Booby wears out the bullpen they are going to need all the relief pitchers they can get. He don’t know what it is like to let a pitcher pitch past the 6-7th inning or 100 pitches whichever comes first. I personally feel that Soriano faked being injured after he signed the 2 year contract but even with that I don’t think they have given him away for nothing. I don’t think they should have given away Frency for nothing either but at least they didn’t trade the farm like they did for Tex. I was a braves fan until that trade and now I don’t care to watch them. I haven’t been to a game since that trade and don’t plan to go to any either. That was indeed one of the most lopsided trades they ever pulled. They knew all along that they couldn’t keep him with the Yankees bottomless checkbook lurking in the background. They should try to sign LaRoche for one year and hopefully Freeman is ready by then. I am rooting for Heyward in 2010 to be the star outfielder he is projected to be and if he is they had better lock him up for a long time. You know the yankees already know about him and his potential.

Robert 1-U

December 14th, 2009
4:36 pm

You whine too much!!!

fsugolf

December 14th, 2009
4:39 pm

MB would it be so bad to have dye at 1st and cameron in the of hell even sign derosa to be a utility player

t_height

December 14th, 2009
4:54 pm

the braves are going to regret letting soriano go. how many pictures have come back after having this surgery and done good the next season. I guess mike hampton didn’t prove anything. The pitching wasn’t the issue last year, it was the hitting. Soriano could have been the set up man this year and Lowe the save man. LaRoche should be resigned, Brandon Jones could play the outfield. Garrett Anderson need to be the pinch hitter and go sign 1 power hitter and 1 lead off hitter or someone with speed. i’m not being racist or anything but i have noticed that colored people can’t last in this organization. 1 year and you are out. when the organization was mixed, the braves was always good.

George Holman

December 14th, 2009
4:59 pm

This guy seems to lock into one player and become totally fix on acquiring “his” guy. I don’t know, but some of his acquisitions were never made (thank goodness).

Pegg

December 14th, 2009
5:12 pm

This is a terrible 5 questions. Mark Bradley is like the Skip Bayless of the AJC. Please stop writing stupid columns.

James Smith

December 14th, 2009
5:13 pm

I think you’re wrong about Soriano. Sure he’s younger, but the decision made sense because we thought he’d get a long-term deal at money we did not want to pay. Additionally, he was less than stellar the last two months of the season. He lost four games in the last two months of the season which would have put us much closer in the wild card race (only 2 out at season’s end) and might have put much more pressure on the Rockies. Wagner, while 38 and coming off of Tommy John, still threw mid-90s and is a hall of famer. You can’t go back on the decision you made to make Wagner the closer and add Soriano back in the mix, the trade was the only move to make.
2. The problem with offering arbitration to LaRoche is that he would accept it and possibly stop any moves that we might make at first. If we’re not looking to deal for a first baseman, it might be a money move, or maybe you’re right, it just doesn’t make sense.
3. Derek Lowe was a terrible signing to begin with, and those 15 wins are about luck much more than anything. His numbers were so good in LA because they play in the grand canyon there and if you look at his three-year splits in LA you’ll know I’m right. If we can get his $15 million off the books for Damon Berryhill, you do it.
4. The Church for Frenchy deal was about dumping Jeff, plain and simple. He’s a crybaby, as shown by his AAA demotion the year before. If he sat on the pine, he’d be unhappy and possibly hurt the locker room. It was a good decision then and is still good now because we’d have to offer him arbitration and keep him another year.
5. I agree with Griffey and Furcal, but I think you’re wrong with Peavy. You can’t say he would have injured himself in ATL. Injuries, and performance for that matter, are not necessarily translated through teams. If you can get a true number one starter like Peavy, you get him. Just a reminder, the reason we did not make the deal was we did not want to trade Locke, whom is now a Pirate for the .250 leadoff hitter.

jfreak

December 14th, 2009
5:15 pm

Lets wait and see how the off season plays out before crowning or killing the GM. So far he’s done a pretty good job with a limited budget. I hope he can work out the LaRoche thing because we need his big bat, but I’m sure the GM is aware of that fact??? The Wagner move I like “if” he’s healthy because those “other two” guys scared me every time they came into the game. Sometimes they were great and sometimes the weren’t. Hopeully Wagner is healthy and can give us a couple of good years.

As far as the Braves overall team I can’t see them finishing better that 2nd or 3rd in the division unless they sign a really big bat. Chipper is still solid but past his prime and LaRoche is good but not great. Still have holes in the line up that teams with good pitching can expose. BIG BAT NEEDED?? Jason Bay would be nice but ….

I like the makeup of this team and with one or two good moves the Braves can contend?

Albie Lopez

December 14th, 2009
5:21 pm

Hey…bring me back! I’m a real innings eater and I am not 40 yet.

Tremaine

December 14th, 2009
6:18 pm

It doesn’t matter. The phillies got Halladay. It must be nice to be a fan of a team that tries to win the World Series every year rather than a team that tries to make people think they have a shot at making the playoffs in order to sale some tickets.

collegeballfan

December 14th, 2009
6:23 pm

Yeah, I just saw the news on Halladay to the Phillies. Damn!

bob

December 14th, 2009
6:25 pm

the time for wren to produce is now. last year he was a rookie. he was learning the strike zone. he hit a couple of singles and struck out a couple of times.

this year he made an error in not anticipating that soriano would accept the arb offer.

he must secure a power threat from the right side. no excuses.

if he fails to land the player, then 2010 will be another ‘close but no cigar’ year.

angels now look as though they need to trade for lowe.

i also like atkins from colorado as an addition.

Coach (2011 or Bust)

December 14th, 2009
7:10 pm

Frank Wren is what he is and 99 percent of the fans have yet to figure it out.

What is he? WAY IN OVER HIS HEAD.

Scott

December 14th, 2009
7:13 pm

I love the idea of having Wagner. He is a Hall of Fame closer who will be more exciting than Soriano to watch. However, Soriano was dominant for awhile and was almost untouchable then he started blowing saves and pitching poorly.

And why keep Laroche? You know he will hit around .180 or .200 in April and flounder in May. I would rather see Omar Infante at first than Laroche.

Kyle

December 14th, 2009
7:23 pm

The only way the move for Wagner makes sense to me is if there is some stud in the minor system who just needs another year or 2 at most to develop into a MLB ready closer. Otherwise the move seems stupid in every way. Second, i think re-signing Laroche would be a good idea, unless Chipper feels its time to make a move to 1st himself. The bullpen and rotation is stout, seems that there really is only a need for a boost of power in the lineup and that means ATL would have to drop the big bucks out and get Bay or Holliday or just be content re-signing Laroche and another 20-25 HR threat. But who knows what will happen, the Braves have been so unpredictable since they started this Championship slump.

Moo

December 14th, 2009
7:59 pm

Jesse Chavez is a better catch than most of you think.

Last season, his first full MLB season, he has a 4.01 ERA and 1.35 WHIP. He had interesting splits… he pitched against almost exactly the same number of RH hitters (146 plate appearances) as LH hitters (140). His numbers are dominant against lefties… .228 AVG and 1.19 WHIP against. But he actually struckout far more righties than lefties, 28 to 19.

The fact that he’s so strong against lefties, when RH pitchers are usually dominant against righties, is a good thing to see from a young reliever.

He’s got “future setup man” written all over him. Mark my words.

Moo.

Justin in NM

December 14th, 2009
8:11 pm

Kyle, read some on the Braves prospects – we have an outstanding closer in the making – I believe he’ll be in AA this year, maybe AAA. Pitched in AFL.

g.h

December 14th, 2009
8:16 pm

Hey Mark.. If you actually followed the Braves you would know who would play second in the event that Prado has to play first- it’s the guy Prado filled in for during injury, Omar Infante.

Nice research.

Justin in NM

December 14th, 2009
8:20 pm

Don’t forget about Brooks Conrad….

Stumpknocker

December 14th, 2009
9:03 pm

Conrad wasn’t one of Cox’s favorites. Seems that he did quite well when given the opportunity, however was relegated to a non-role soon afterward. Spending most of his career in the minors, I guess made him less likely to succeed in the majors….Go figure.

ugagolf8166

December 14th, 2009
9:12 pm

some get over it we arent going to have bay or holliday to much money we will have 2 of the 4 nady, dye, laroche, cameron and hopefully add derosa to for a hometown discount cuss me out but this will happen so be happy

tdmorgan

December 14th, 2009
9:15 pm

MB, that was a terrible article. Laroche has stated that he wants a 3 year 31 million contract…we would be overpaying. Laroche was amazing in the second half…just like every year but the first half of the year always leaves you wanting more. Wagner has been a dominant closer for years, he had to have TJ surgery so what how many other pitchers have come back and still been their same old selves or even better…almost all. Soriano has been a constant injury concern since he’s been here and he had teams talking to him but he was inpatient that’s the only reason he accepted. DLowe did win but his actual stats were horrible, its highly unlikely that he keeps winning like he did this year if he pitches the same way. And Francouer, ever since we rewarded McCann for his stellar performance and Frenchy wasn’t getting a similar contract he has gone down hill he needed a change of scenery and we swapped fringe outfielder for fringe outfielder. We don’t really need Church, especially at an increased rate next year.

gayle

December 14th, 2009
9:21 pm

With the Phillies and Mets restocking, everything appears to be geared towards contending in 2011 – by then, Freeman, Hanson et al will be ready to play and perhaps Chipper will either retire or relegate himself (voluntarily?) to coach/player. And most importantly, the relic will be gone from the dugout and hopefully the chop and memories of all those lost championships with him. It really will be a great opportunity for this team to start fresh and build a new identity – the one going on now is really getting old.

Justin in NM

December 14th, 2009
9:29 pm

Conrad was sent back to the minors when KJ came off the DL. Now that KJ is gone, time to give Conrad or Diorys Hernandez more playing time.

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
9:55 pm

Apparently I didn’t make my point on No. 4 clearly enough: I agree that simply getting rid of Francoeur was the aim and that losing Church is no big deal. (So to speak.) See, I ask the question in something of a prosecutorial tone but answer it in a way favorable to Frank Wren. Don’t I?

Mark Bradley

December 14th, 2009
11:46 pm

Mark Bradley, you are a dumbass and a total douchebag

Jeff Walker

December 14th, 2009
11:49 pm

Bad instincts? Let’s just think about some things Wren has done. He had the guts to stare every Braves fan in the face and take the heat for cutting ties with 2 HOF pitchers, and that paid off ok. He turned a girlish 1B in Kotchman into Laroche who had a strong 2nd half. Kawakami has been a good value at less than $8M a year, not a huge salary for a sub-4 ERA. Have you forgotten about a trade involving an aging/declining Edgar Renteria that brought us JJ and Gorkys Hernandez (who later helped land Nate)? That was an unbelievable trade Wren made. Garret had good value at $2.5M, Soriano gets in funks where he gives up too many HRs, so i like Wagner with the lefty power hitters in the division. I also like the Chavez kid, he has good potential with that power arm. Oh and Wren got Vasquez for 4 avg prospects. So, I’m more than pleased with Wren. He has been put in some tough spots on a budget that doesn’t compare to the people we have to beat! So, get a clue before you question him like he is terrible!

Kelly's Johnson

December 14th, 2009
11:52 pm

Uncle Frank, will I at least get an invite to Spring Training?

Nostradamus

December 14th, 2009
11:56 pm

While the Phillies trade their best pitcher (Cliff Lee) for an obvious upgrade in Roy Halliday, look at their core hitters: Utley, Rollins & Howard. The Braves have NOBODY like those three in their lineup. Assuming the starting pitching holds up and the ancient bullpen isn’t torched by July, the Braves will finish in second place at best, all assuming they can still find a firstbaseman and outfielder that can hit above .250.

Mac

December 15th, 2009
2:49 am

We was thinking….leave Sonny Clusters alone! His are the most rational and best thoughts on this blog. He knows Dairy Queen too. Thanks for the humor, Sonny Clusters.

hop

December 15th, 2009
6:16 am

LaRoche is gone, with seattle getting a very good hitting first baseman.
so much for chipper begging the braves to sign him, oh well what does chipper know, as wren ask another stupid question.

the braves will once again finish behind the phillies and mets!

Elmer

December 15th, 2009
6:39 am

The 5 questions are what many of us have asked. LaRoche will be a big loss.

stew

December 15th, 2009
9:11 am

Now that Lowe has been shipped to the Angels, can we please extend Javy so that we have a rotation of Javy/JJ/Tommy/Huddy for the next four years and go to work on the offense? Promote Jason and Freddie and get El Caballo and we be set.

Justin from NM

December 15th, 2009
9:58 am

Jumping the gun a bit on LaRoche and Lowe, aren’t we boys?

Pendleton

December 15th, 2009
11:30 am

They should forget about paying through the nose for a hitter, and just get a good hitting coach! Oh, wait…

Answers to Bradley « Rowland's Office

December 15th, 2009
5:10 pm

[...] journalism, the braintrust | Leave a Comment The local organ columnist Mark Bradley recently posed five reasonable questions about Frankie’s offseason [...]

CTBRAVEFAN

January 3rd, 2010
12:36 am

I like the Vazquez deal it sets our pitching up nicely for 2012 or 2013. With the addition of Arodys Vizcaino. But I hope that there are still big plans to add a bat like say Dan Uggla and trade Cabrera for him.That way the Vazquez deal is more like 15 wins for 30 hr and then platoon Diaz and Heyward in right. I dont think that Diaz has the pop that the Braves need for an every day left fielder. I think that I would probably play Uggla in the outfield cause Prado did so well last year at 2nd. I think that if Gluas can find some way to stay healthy then that was a good move. That adds hopefully 20+ hr and i like the way that the bullpen is shaping up