The Hot Button: Where would Tech finish in the SEC?

There's a difference between ACC speed and SEC speed. (AJC photo by Curtis Compton)

There's a difference between ACC speed and SEC speed. (AJC photo by Curtis Compton)

It’s clear – to me, if not to C.J. Spiller and Dabo Swinney — that Georgia Tech is the class of the ACC. But the ACC is often described as the least of the six BCS leagues, and another conference in the neighborhood is regarded as the best. So now, today’s question:

Where would Tech rank in the SEC?

My first inclination is to say the Jackets would finish wherever Mike Slive’s refs got together and decided they should be, but that’s my little joke. Getting serious, I’d say …

Second in the East behind Florida. Third in the West behind Alabama and LSU. Fourth overall.

That wailing you hear are the cries arising from the confluence of North Avenue and Techwood Drive, but hear me out. As good as Tech is — and it is very good — there’s still a difference between the personnel of a top-shelf SEC team and of everyone else. (Ask Jim Tressel.) This doesn’t mean Tech couldn’t up and beat Florida or Alabama or LSU on a given Saturday; it simply means that, on most given Saturdays, talent would prevail.

We’ve seen the difference between the SEC and the ACC three times in this city in the past 15 months. Alabama beat Clemson in the 2008 Chick-fil-A Kickoff Classic and then whipped Virginia Tech in the 2009 installment. LSU beat Tech 38-3 on Dec. 31, 2008. Three games on a neutral field, three emphatic SEC victories. Anyone who says there isn’t an imbalance between leagues, at least at their respective summits, isn’t dealing in reality.

On the other hand, SEC zealots are wrong to suggest the Jackets would finish far up the track in that famous league. Tech is better than Ole Miss, better than Auburn, better than South Carolina, better than Arkansas … yes, better than Georgia. To be placed below Florida and Alabama is no great failing, for those are two of the three best teams in the land, and to be deemed less gifted than LSU is no demerit, given that the Tigers have lost only to the Gators and the Tide.

Where would Tech rank in the SEC?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

(And yes, I have noticed that Tech beat both Mississippi State and Vandy by one more point than did the mighty Gators. Whatever that means.)

Since you asked, I don’t think it’s a question of Paul Johnson’s offense not working in the SEC. It’s an issue instead of the SEC’s Big Three having superior defensive manpower. Nobody else in the ACC has the speed to keep up with Dwyer and Nesbitt and Roddy Jones; certain teams in the SEC do.

OK, there’s my take. Feel free to call me an idiot — pretty much everybody does — but know this: I do speak from observation. I’ve seen Tech and Florida and LSU in person both this season and last, and I saw Alabama in the imposing flesh twice in 2008. And I’m not trying to denigrate the Jackets, who might well be the nation’s fifth-best team. (After Florida, Texas, Alabama and LSU. Though I’m not suggesting LSU, with its two losses, should be ranked ahead of Tech in the polls.) I’m just telling you how I see it.

You’re now free to express yourselves on this weighty matter.  Why do I feel you won’t need prompting?

And now, because fair’s fair: Where would Georgia rank in the ACC?

901 comments Add your comment

Newnan Jacket

November 11th, 2009
12:32 am

gold and white

November 11th, 2009
12:32 am

gold and white

November 11th, 2009
12:33 am

just beat me there…

Robby

November 11th, 2009
12:34 am

I would have to agree that! Go Tech! THWG

Mark Bradley

November 11th, 2009
12:34 am

You guys are too fast. I can barely Tweet the post on Twitter before you find it. Kudos to one and all.

waldejh

November 11th, 2009
12:42 am

I think that you are spot on. The Big 3 of the SEC are extremely fast on defense, but I think that we could have that same ability at Tech. I think that Johnson has done a fine job, and that it wont be long before we are an annual contestant for the national crown. I dont think that we have the defense to stand with the powerhouses yet, but great players like to win and it looks like we will see a lot more victories to come on the Flats. Talent will soon be pouring out in droves to wear the white and gold.

waldejh

November 11th, 2009
12:43 am

Oh and can we please get a kicker. Like a real one.

Newnan Jacket

November 11th, 2009
12:43 am

Luck…

Georgia Tech could win in the SEC and they’ve done so in the past. Aside from that, do you remember a few years ago, SEC coaches saying that the SEC was at a disadvantage because of the parity in the league? Because there weren’t any undefeated teams they weren’t in the NC conversation. What a short term argument! Long term?That parity then brought three of the best teams in the country now. Same with the ACC: beating the snot out of each other now will only make us stronger later on. Maybe then MB can ask an even better question: Where would UGA be ranked if it were in the ACC? (My answer would be 12th… but then I am biased)

Ryan

November 11th, 2009
12:46 am

I really think that we would beat Florida or Alabama if we were given the chance. This is the most explosive team since 1998-99. Florida and Alabama might have better defenses but thats about it. Ive watched LSU play this year and they struggled during some games also. All these teams I believe are very close together. Its too bad we dont have a playoff system where we can truly find out whos better.

THE HELL WITH GEORGIA!

GO JACKETS!

gold and white

November 11th, 2009
12:50 am

i think this is about right. it would be a toss up between the jackets and lsu for the third spot though. We could challenge UF and Bama consistenly but seldom beat them. SEC is the best in the country, no doubt (though it is somewhat top-heavy). But I want to see what we do to finishout the season. We’re 9-1 now and #7, but “we still havent done anything yet!” Lets smash Duke, handle UGA, beat CLemson, then beat our Orange bowl opponent (If it’s boise, tcu, or cincy, let’s smash em!). Then, i’ll say for sure that we’d be near the very top of the SEC.

***(unfortunately we’re in the acc…)***

Mark Bradley

November 11th, 2009
12:54 am

It is a shame there’s no playoff. The Jackets would be the team nobody wanted to face.

I Bleed White and Old Gold

November 11th, 2009
12:58 am

I’m with Mark. And I think the gap between LSU and whoever is next in the SEC is huge!

JJacket

November 11th, 2009
12:58 am

Hopefully, Utah wouldn’t be included. Otherwise, by your logic, it would be Florida and Utah at the top – followed by Bamalama and LSU.

62jacket

November 11th, 2009
12:59 am

Mark,
I agree with your overall premise, that being that this season, the Jackets would probably be the fourth best in the SEC behind FL, AL,and LSU. But I think that’s due more to our lack of defense than their ability to defend our offense. If we can just get say, into the top 20 in total defense, I think it’s a different story. Also, I don’t care what conference GT plays in, with a week to prepare, most defenses aren’t disciplined enough for 60 minutes to contain it. In fact, as to the superior defensive speed you mentioned, speed and discipline don’t always go hand-in-hand. With 3-4 weeks to prepare, a bowl game might be different, especially against a top-notch defense. However, over the course of a season, with a decent defense, I would put us at or near the top of any conference.

UGA75

November 11th, 2009
12:59 am

I think at present the Jackets would finish 4th, per MB. I think given their superior coach they would challenge Ala and Florida within two years. The rest of the ACC better get used to looking at the back end of the stinger for the next few years, and since UGA doesn’t have a defensive coach of any kind, so will the Dawgs

Big Dawg

November 11th, 2009
1:07 am

I don’t think LSU would mind much….

spjacket

November 11th, 2009
1:15 am

I agree with everything you said about Tech. But do you really think the ACC is below the the Big East and the Big Ten this year? And one could have a case about the ACC being stronger than the Pac 10 this season.

Jamal Crawford for Atlanta Mayor

November 11th, 2009
1:16 am

Based on my viewing of the LSU-Georgia game, which UGA should have actually won, I’d say that Tech would place 3rd in the SEC, AHEAD of LSU. I don’t think they’re 3rd in talent, though. I think that UGA and LSU are both definitively ahead of Tech just on players, and SC, Arkansas, maybe even MS are ahead on that score. But, it’s about coaching and talent, and Paul Johnson has proven to be a great hire.

It’s just a shame we don’t have a playoff… please everyone (Tech fans who are hoping for a miracle BCS bid, I forgive you for not joining in) root for a Boise State v. Cinncinnati BCS bowl! Hopefully, that would tick enough people off to demand a change!!!!

(Speaking of… where do you think THOSE teams would sit in the SEC???)

jacketit

November 11th, 2009
1:27 am

Honestly, I think Tech would have a good shot at knocking off Florida based solely on what regularly stop us, and that is a dominating front four. While their D-line is good, it isn’t dominate like an Alabama. And given that their offense isn’t as good as it has been in recent memory, I think Tech might have a shot to outscore them. Now Alabama, their D-line is too big and too dominating right now for Tech to compete against. Now, CPJ would probably come up with some adjustments to try to counter it, I don’t think it would help much. I’m not even going to try to predict what would happen if we played LSU, they are just too schizophrenic to accurately predict.

GTGreg

November 11th, 2009
2:16 am

Ok, I’ll bite. Regarding the inane caption on the lead photo: did you actually watch the Peach-fil-a bowl last year? That was a game decided by special teams gaffes and enormous miscues, not by Essss Eeee Seee Speed (registered trademark) as you suggest. It wasn’t about Les Miles’ legendary preparation skills, as asserted by my LSU friends (I live among them down here in NOLA). It wasn’t about a blueprint to stop the option. It was about crappy special teams play pure and simple. All of the other factors could have very well been overcome, had the whole muffed punt/onside kick chain reaction been interrupted. Respect to Les Miles for his timely play calls, but Tech did about as much to lose that game as LSU did to win it.

Now about that SECSpeed again… you do realize that Tech is the only team to hang 50+ on an SEC defense this season, right? The fastest-of-them-all Gators hung about half that on the same Vandy defense in the swamp. Did Vandy save all of their speed for their game with UF? Hopefully Tech will get to hang 50+ on another SEC defense before bowl season…

stu

November 11th, 2009
2:41 am

“whipped Virginia Tech in the 2009 installment” Bama had to make a fourth quarter comeback to win that game. What are you talking about? GTech whipped Virginia tech, not bama.

Gravy Train

November 11th, 2009
2:47 am

I think it has already been proven that 1-AA and less such teams have what it takes to beat this vaunted Tech squad. That “it” is an opportunistic assignment defense. Shut down the corners, keep the action in the middle contained and wait for the qb to turn it over. Especially in Tech’s case, wait for the cocky coach to gamble and lose.

I’ve heard so much inane pontification from the geek squad this season: “Our offense is unstoppable,” “We own this or that,” “We are the best team in the state,” or the all-time greatest “NFL scouts are looking at our QB.”

MB, it’s your Shangri-La song that helps fuel this situation. The real story should be “If this offense is so great, why isn’t it used in the NFL or any major college program?” “Why does the national media give Tech the fly-by treament?”

I just don’t get what you see here MB. You like PJ, fine. But why in the world go overboard with it?

Charles Foster Kane would be proud.

Sting-em! Buzzz

November 11th, 2009
3:49 am

He’s talking about in the Chick-fil-a Kickoff Classic. The first game of the season.

Ted Striker

November 11th, 2009
4:03 am

Where would Tech finish in the SEC? They wouldn’t. They couldn’t make it through a season.

Not Disappointed!

November 11th, 2009
4:19 am

Okay Mark you have my attention. I believe you maybe on the money. I still think feel 3rd, but 4th isn’t bad in the sec.

Great Read. “Going back to bed.” Later jackets!

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:29 am

Why would a prestigious academic school like Georgia Tech want to be part of an academic scandal filled league like the Schools Education Criminals. Did someone just say Jan Kemp was a hero? We have an offensive lineman majoring in aeronautical engineering. At UgaG you can enroll in the school of food science and eat your way to a degree. It is much harder to get 5 star athletes when your school requires ALL students to take two semesters of advanced calculus. No, I didn’t say “calluses” UgaG, Alabama and Auburn athletes. And Tech doesn’t ask the bureau of pardons and paroles for recruiting lists.

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:40 am

…and a reminder, Tech athletes ranked #1 in the nation in SAT scores, Florida ranked dead last. That’s why there ranked the #1 football program in the country. And if you don’t agree then Urban Cryer has a player who will poke your eyes out. Florida was ranked the #1 party school with UgaG (school of drunk arrested athletes) ranked near the top as well. Mark do you recall the year all those players sold their SEC championship rings? Then got caught smoking pot on campus. Well at least they got enough at the pawn shop for their ring to buy a bag of weed.

m

November 11th, 2009
5:22 am

Mark…your idiotic sec bias is showing.

alabammer and floriduh are mainly media creations. alabammer is basically no better than a weak tennersee team and floriduh was pushed to the limit by a missy st team that tech handled easily.

Tech would be just as likely to beat alabammer or floriduh as they would of beating tech.

You sec homer gomers are just silly. If we ever have a playoff the sec is going to be exposed big time.

falcon 71

November 11th, 2009
5:41 am

doesnt matter they are in the weak ACC so there is no 8 game gauge. wish to god they hadnt left the SEC in the 60s though then we would know for sure wonder if the SEC would trade Vandy for Tech in a hartbeat

RYan

November 11th, 2009
6:02 am

Yeah. Right. I think LSU wouldn’t be ahead.

And you also have to split tech into BM and AM: Before MIami and After MIami,.

And why is it when Alabama barely escapes Vs an inferior team ,y blocking a last minute field goal, its just ‘Evidence of the strength of the SEC”, but when teach Vs a wake team that, records aside, is arguably better than the team Alabama almost lost to. . .

A team not in the SEC plays the same game Alabama did that week they slip down a few slots.

RYan

November 11th, 2009
6:04 am

‘A weak ACC’ – why are they weak. . because theya ren’t the SEC. Why is the SEC strong? Because they are the SEC and every team in it automatically gets extra credit merely for their conference rather than actual accomplishments, and they start ranked higher and therefore finish ranked higher in a self fulfilling prophecy. Mainly due to ESPN’s crush on the SEC.

Tony has a burr in his saddle

November 11th, 2009
6:06 am

Mark… I think you are right.. maybe 3rd ahead of LSU.. but no higher.. give Johnson another 2 years and the story may be different

M Reagan

November 11th, 2009
6:12 am

Mark let me ask you a question? With Wake having a win over Stanford, NC State having a win over #12 Pittsburg, FSU routing BYU on the road, Miami taking care of Oklahoma, Va Tech beating Nebraska, Clemson taking TCU to the buzzer, Tech waxing MS State on the road, besides Alabama beating Va Tech in the first game, what does the mighty SEC have to hang their hat on out side of beating each other?

Gordon

November 11th, 2009
6:15 am

No question we are behind UF, Alabama, and LSU. Probably 4th or 5th. I would have to say it would be easier to get upset by a middle tier SEC team (Auburn, Arkansas, South Carolina) than a middle tier ACC team (North Carolina, FSU, Boston College).

Scrap

November 11th, 2009
6:22 am

Mark, great piece! I’m glad to see we’re back to the “Good Ole Fashioned Hate” theme………It does wonders to fuel one of the country’s great rivalries. Ain’t Georgia football great? THWG, and lets focus on Duke, then UGA, then Clemson or whoever…….This could still be a special season for the Jackets.

Pipepimp

November 11th, 2009
6:29 am

M, I guess M= Mindless, Moron, Mouthy, Maniac, etc…….., if you even think GT could lead the pack in the S.E.C…

dagnabit

November 11th, 2009
6:33 am

Mark. I’ll ride with that. Good column.

GT4Ever

November 11th, 2009
6:37 am

I agree with 4th but LSU isn’t as tough as they have been so maybe you can’t rule out 3rd. At this moment would would give UF and Bama a battle. If Tech was in the SEC, with all the national attention they would get would be a big plus recruiting wise. It would raise their media attention even more than their getting right now. So maybe in a few years we could challenge the mighty UF and Bama.

The Other Saint Simons

November 11th, 2009
6:42 am

I am a dawg and it pains me to say that Tech would win this year after 8 years of being Vandy and Kentucky’s pal way down at the bottom. This last two years gets everyone’s attention, but then their coach goes to Notre Dame and they hire Reggie Ball to replace him. (Since we are dreaming).

GT Rules State

November 11th, 2009
6:43 am

GT could beat any team on any day. D is only question.

Tech Man in Dawg Country

November 11th, 2009
6:44 am

I agree with Mark overall, but would put Tech third, ahead of LSU. I agree it is Tech’s defense (or lack thereof) that is the difference between Tech and Florida and Alabama. However, I don’t think LSU’s offense is anything special either, so I think Tech could simply out score them. And before you mention the Peach Bowl, that was last year, not this. Last year they would have been 4th, this year 3rd, and with Nesbitt returning and Tebow leaving, who knows about next year…

Big time?? Not

November 11th, 2009
6:47 am

Four tickets, four hot dogs, four cokes. 51,000 at “biggest game of year” Joke

EEJacket

November 11th, 2009
6:48 am

More or less I agree with you Mark. I just think I disagree on HOW we’d lose to UF, Bama, and Loosoo.

First of all, we’d beat LSU and bama much more often than UF. The gaytors can get it done on both sides of the ball consistently well, wereas bama and loosoo rely heavily on their defenses to make the stop. That being said, I don’t think its the “SEC Speed” you’re talking about that would get us, I think its the SEC strength. I’d pick Sean Bedford over Terrance Cody any day in a reaction time, sprinting, or drinking contest, but damned if ol’ Terrance couldn’t bench 1.75 Bedfords. I guess my point is they’d muscle us down at the line more often than not, but if we get that ball past the initial coverage watch out baby because AA and JD and BBT would pick apart any SEC secondary (with the exception, probably, of UF’s)

Teddy

November 11th, 2009
6:53 am

Tech can’t throw the ball a lick. That won’t work in the SEC. THey will put nine in the box and shut down the run. Second, the caliber of play is at a consistently high level every week – not patsies in the middle of the season like in the ACC. The grind of the SEC would lead to two or three more losses for Tech, at least until they got used to the routine. Tech would have to be deeper in talent and would have to learn to pass, if not, they would be a mid level team in the SEC. Will say Johnson is a tremendous coach, and with the added exposure being in the SEC, he would fill out that team and get the players he needs to be competitive. But, he would have to adapt that offense. No throw, no win. SEC has too many big defense linemen and too much speed to be one dimensional.

SEC is tops when....

November 11th, 2009
6:53 am

it comes to playing cupcake teams like College of Charleston, Troy, and FIU in the same season. The #1 team in the nation scheduled all of these lightweights in addition to playing the cupcakes in their own league like Vanderbilt. Why does everyone think they’re so great when they continually schedule weak out of conference games? Simple -ratings, money, and large fan bases.

Many SEC schools also have a high number of “special permit” players that would not even be admitted to college if it depended on their GPA’s and SAT scores. The playing field is not level in that respect. If those SEC schools adhered to TECH’s academic standards, they would not be as competitive as they are now.

Top Dawg

November 11th, 2009
6:55 am

“Last” is the answer to your question.

GatorMan

November 11th, 2009
6:58 am

Georgia Tech would finish second. Georgia Tech THIS year would be LSU (yes I saw the game last year, Tech’s QB and offense in general are on a different level this year). They would also take Alabama IMO over a seven game series. They would still be behind UF, as UF has an offense and a defense as opposed to Alabama. Alabama couldn’t score 40 if they had to in order to beat Tech.

UTvolunteer

November 11th, 2009
7:00 am

Tech would finish 4th right now….

1. Florida
2. Alabama
3. Tennessee
4. Georgia Tech
5. LSU
6. South Carolina
7. Auburn
8. Arkansas
9. Ole Miss
10. Georgia
11. Miss St
12. Kentucky
13. Vanderbilt

AZ Jacket

November 11th, 2009
7:02 am

Who cares where they would finish. Tech is not in the SEC. We have been in the ACC for years. We have a division clinching game this Saturday and that is all CPJ and the team are thinking about. We played 4 SEC teams last year and we came out 3-1. We play 3 this year and have beat two already. Mark you write these blogs just to give the dawg fans something bitch about. They cannot brag about their programs so you set them up with stupid articles such as this. It is a shame the the AJC cannot be journalist and bring insight to programs and teams. They can only create ‘what ifs’ that have no meaning at all.

KJ

November 11th, 2009
7:05 am

“Anyone who says there isn’t an imbalance between leagues, at least at their respective summits, isn’t dealing in reality.”

You only have to read posts by m, ramble on, newnan jacket et.al.to know there are no shortage of NATStards on these blogs that aren’t “dealing in reality.” They actually think that beating up on Vandy and MSU, and winning 1 game in 7 against UGA translates into “dominating the SEC”.

OrlG8r

November 11th, 2009
7:06 am

I’d like to know where you think UGA would be if they were in the ACC?

Scott V.

November 11th, 2009
7:06 am

Mark,
I’m glad to see you’re buying into the SEC brand that ESPN has spent billions marketing. The truth is, LSU, Alabama, and Florida are not that good this year. The main reason why everybody thinks they are is because they are in the SEC and started off so high. Florida and Alabama could both easily have a loss right now, and LSU could feasably have 4. Washington came within a quarter of knocking them off and LSU came through with a defensive touchdown. Washington has a losing record. Lowly Mississippi State knocks off LSU if their quarterback sees the pitch man everybody else in the country saw wide open. Florida failed to score on a Vanderbilt team that Tech’s offense took to school (a top 35 defense at the time actually).

Finally, the LSU game was an aberration last year. Most SEC schools we face would not have a month to prepare for our option attack. They would have the same time Vandy and Miss. State had…who both sport SEC speed defenses and got blasted. Georgia had two weeks last year and got blasted. And are you really going to go there with the Clemson Alabama game? Clemson proved to be a mediocre team and Alabama went into the SEC championship game as the #1 team in the land. Not exactly a balanced matchup. And this year Alabama is tops in the nation and Virginia Tech is probably the third best team in the ACC and we’re comparing. How I wish there were a way we could play an SEC team in a bowl this year…

snapshot

November 11th, 2009
7:07 am

If CPJ builds a good defense to go with his offense Tech would finish at the top of the SEC. No question about it.

AZ Jacket

November 11th, 2009
7:09 am

Big time?? Not, no hotdogs, no cokes, just 9-1. Rather have 51,000 fans watching a winning team than 90,000 fans watching a looser. Leg humpers like you are typical. You have nothing to brag about in that team so all you can do is trash other programs.

SuperB

November 11th, 2009
7:11 am

Yeah, that OT win over Wake Forest on their home field convinces me that Georgia Tech would beat all of those SEC teams. (That must have convinced Mark Bradley as well.)

mtraininjax

November 11th, 2009
7:15 am

Good article Mark, good year to put Tech back into SEC, perhaps you could return the favor and rank UGA in the ACC, it might be the only good news UGA fans get all year long.

I agree that FL, AL, LSU, then Tech. FL, AL, LSU have had GT’esque games where they win by holding the ball last. I could rank Tech anywhere in the Top 4, should Tech repeat this season with similar success next year.

Finally someone has challenged VT, and exposed their young team. For so many years, they steamrolled through the ACC, and now we see that coaching is a large part of success.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
7:15 am

This is a reasonable assessment of where Tech would be in the SEC, but the ACC is not the least of the 6 BCS leagues. The Big East is. NC State, who is winless in the ACC, beat the 2nd best Big East team Pitt for their only loss this year. UNC beat UConn at UConn. ACC is better than the Big East hands down.

No Dog In This Fight

November 11th, 2009
7:16 am

It’s about the two Ds — depth and defense. Tech would finish fourth, or lower, because their defense would give up too many points. And over the course of a season playing SEC teams, Tech’s starters would get very tired.

But these deficiencies would be corrected very quickly if Tech joined the SEC. The increased exposure and the lax academic standards would allow Tech to recruit the same marginal students who populate the SEC rosters.

Tech has an amazing scheme and is a fun team to watch, but they aren’t exactly blowing teams away. They have won several key games in the second half once the shallower teams’ defenses have tired. That would be a much more iffy strategy against the top of the SEC.

Golden Hand

November 11th, 2009
7:18 am

Seems reasonable. Paul Johnson is only in Year Two of making Tech a contender with the Floridas and Alabamas. He’s always going to have to use a bit of smoke and mirrors to make up for Tech’s inherent recruiting disadvantages (so did Bobby Dodd), but once Tech actually has 85 scholarship players, and depth on both lines, I can see them doing it with the coaching advantage they have. I’ll take fourth in the SEC when you have only three scholarship seniors. If all the stud juniors come back, though, they’re probably going to be better than post-Tebow Florida next year.

SuperB

November 11th, 2009
7:18 am

Scott V: GT “blasted” Georgia last year? What was the score? (I hope you are as arrogant on (Georgia) game day this year as you are now.)

As for Mr. UT, placing the Vols third in your SEC slate is a joke. When the circus leaves town in a couple of years, you will be left with the remnants of Lane Kiffin. He can sell, but his timid “keep it close” strategy in the Florida game convinced a lot of people he was not a championship-caliber coach.

VOL Fan

November 11th, 2009
7:19 am

“This doesn’t mean Tech couldn’t up and beat Florida or Alabama or LSU on a given Saturday; it simply means that, on most given Saturdays, talent would prevail.”

Nuff said. Tech has had a decent season but that doesn’t make them a force to be reckoned with over night (sorry Ramblin Wrecks: beating a lowly Vandy team doesn’t garner you respect that easily) Put up a few championships-conference AND national- have a few MORE decent (emphasis on “decent”) seasons and the SEC *might* respect your franchise. :-)

Alabama Jack

November 11th, 2009
7:20 am

Wasn’t it Bear Bryant who said the true measure of coaching was if you could take yours and beat his’in and then take his’in and beat yours.

Put them in any order you want but is there is any school in the country that wouldn’t take Saban, Miles, Myer or Johnson? Maybe Brian Kelly when he has a track record, but for my money right now the aformentioned are the top four coaches in the nation.

#1DAWGAFAN

November 11th, 2009
7:22 am

Tech barely beat Vandy and Miss St. Vandy put up 31 points on you. You would probably be an at best 9th place in the SEC (that is if you beat UGA).

Doug the Jacket

November 11th, 2009
7:25 am

CPJ is in his second year. GT will be better than any SEC team in year 4.

kepah17

November 11th, 2009
7:29 am

I think you nailed it

Duh

November 11th, 2009
7:34 am

There are quite a few nuts replying to this blog. MB made some valid points I’ve been making around my office all season. The only difference is I’d put UT ahead of Tech too. Seriously. Too many football fans in general do not respect defense one bit. They look at exciting offensive plays and big points to base all their opinions. They think a low scoring game means the teams are “down”. Why don’t they consider a high scoring game between teams like Tech vs Vandy or Tech vs MSU a sign of 2 teams who can’t defend jack squat?

Matchups are everything in sports. I think Tech would be 5th behind UF, AU, LSU (who beat Tech with a weaker team within in the past year), and UT (defense is too good to let Tech get off). That said, does anyone really think Tech’s defense can stop Arkansas? I mean look at Tech’s defensive performances against FSU, Miami, and even Wake Forest and tell me they can keep the Razorbacks in check. And to be honest, I wouldn’t be so sure about the rivalry game 11/28. Sure, Tech won 45-42 last year but isn’t that a toss up in a shootout? Had Tech won that game Florida-style like 45-17 then I’d agree that they are light years better than UGA but they are not.

Hunting Dawg

November 11th, 2009
7:34 am

I actually think that Tech could give LSU a run for their money this year and possibly be the 3rd best team in the SEC. No doubt that they are superior to the Dawgs, and it kills me to say that, due to coaching. I still believe that Georgia has more talented players.

In any event, this is all speculation and till the powers that be rid themselves of the BCS format and adopt a playoff system, we will never truly know how all teams rank versus one another.

Go Dawgs!!!!!

THWGT

BigStinger

November 11th, 2009
7:36 am

Lighten up, Mark. You know that the order is this:

1. (tie) UGA
1. (tie) UF
3. Bama.
4. LSU
5. Miami

UGA is just not playing with their heads this year, but they are the best along with UF. The rest, really, are just fighting for 3rd place. Miami is clearly better than GA Tech, and truly, VPI would go 5th, since the nerds cheated to win that one. Beamer showed the All Cupcake Conference the evidence, so there’s no doubt.

Appreciate you trying to spread the love around, but sometimes the truth is the truth. Tell it.

Cosmo

November 11th, 2009
7:38 am

#1 DAWGAFAN: Barely beat Vandy and Miss St? Gave up points? Yes. Beat them worse than Florida did? Also Yes. Will hang 50 on UGA? Likely. Are you people even paying attention? Apparently No.

sugarpikegang

November 11th, 2009
7:39 am

There is still a lot of football yet to be played. Though UGA may be less of a team crazier things have happened on Saturday after Thanksgiving to place UGA atop the Jackets. From an alumnus of Tech, UGA will play a tough game against Tech…

…And isn’t Duke 3-1 in the ACC at this point. Before we finish the season three (or four) games early, why not just let the season play out. Polls are given too much credence too soon.

Required Reading | Hard Knox Sports

November 11th, 2009
7:40 am

[...] Where would Tech finish in SEC? [AJC] [...]

GEORGIA97

November 11th, 2009
7:40 am

GTGreg = cry baby walking around with his boo-boo lip stuck out. You got owned by LSU so shut your mouth.

jdl2

November 11th, 2009
7:41 am

Well, the Jackets are 2-9 against the SEC this year so far. Reckon we’ll find out how good we are this year when the dogs come to town in a couple of weeks. Suffice it to say we’re a hello of a lot better off than we were three years ago. Keep it up, BEAT DOOK, THEN sting the dawgz!

EEJacket

November 11th, 2009
7:42 am

PJ would adjust with the pass. Maybe his first year wouldn’t be so hot in this regard, but after a while he’d learn he needs two guys instead of one that he can put the ball in the air to downfield in order to get past “that SEC speed.” Other than that, I don’t particularly see the SEC defenses being quick enough to stop the option. Like I said before, we’d get muscled around at the line, but once he’d be there long enough to recruit to take care of that problem, I think we’d be 2nd after a while and assuming oof doesn’t continue their reign, 1st.

Jim

November 11th, 2009
7:42 am

Tech was an SEC school chose to go away , so What IF doesn’t count for Tech! Just think they could take the whippings every year that other SEC schools take from these guys .. Too Bad Tech , guess you have to live with the ACC

Van Lingo Mungo

November 11th, 2009
7:42 am

Tech doesn’t have enough loud-mouth, bark-but-no-bite, trailer-trash fans to play in the overrated, overhyped SEC

Jake

November 11th, 2009
7:45 am

Tech had their chance. They were a member of the SEC years ago, but felt they had bigger fish to fry.

Southside Drug Rep

November 11th, 2009
7:47 am

It’s a shame we didn’t have this conversation over the PAST TWENTY YEARS! The North Avenue Trade School would have battled Vandy and Kentucky for the basement most of the past fifteen seasons. Welcome to the top ten Jackets. I certainly hope the Dawgs upset you as I sit way up high in 228.

Flush Twice…
It’s a LONG way to North Avenue

richtfan

November 11th, 2009
7:47 am

tech, in their best year, would be an also ran consistently in the SEC. this year they would finish ahead of many teams, but that’s an aberration.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
7:50 am

who cares? they will tumble after my guys shut ‘em out!

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
7:51 am

ok, I’ll be realistic: GA 34 GA Tech 20

Ed77

November 11th, 2009
7:53 am

As an engineer, I admit I think in terms of design optimization. You usually can’t optimize for two criteria simultaneously. I supported our departure from the SEC to the ACC because the SEC was moving ever faster towards optimizing their football programs to win championships and away from training boys to become young men. Call me an idealist if you like but the football factories have made their choice and they can live with it. I understand that Tech has not exactly covered itself in glory in the past few years with our acedemic problems and extracurricular activites of some former players. However, I don’t ever want us to quit trying because of those relatively few failures.

Go Tech

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
7:53 am

my high school defense will crush tech’s high school offense. 11 men in the box at all times.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
7:54 am

ed77, i wouldnt call you an idealist but i would call you a geek.

best, willie

Mulk

November 11th, 2009
7:55 am

If you are going to use Bama verses who they play to judge a conference then the SEC would be dead last. They don’t lose in the SEC often. The SEC might have a good conference but it is highly overated. How or why do you judge a conference instead of a team, anyway.

And, while on the subject, somebody (coaches, Ad’s, news reporters,fan bases, etc.) from the other conferences has got to stop this automatic National Championship assignment handed out to the winner of the SEC. Who said it should be automatic. The National Championship should be about the 2 best teams, and not because they played in the SEC. Furthermore, who said that a one-loss-SEC team deserves to be considered over every other conference winner or even one game loser?

Tech has a good offense and good coach but there are several teams in the ACC that could beat them. And, there is just as many teams in the ACC that could beat Bama and Fla. as there are in the SEC.

Jacketman

November 11th, 2009
7:56 am

#1Dawgafan—–Your team is 5-4, and you want to talk about Tech “barely beat”? Look at your “barely beats”. Just take SC and AZ State…not far at all from 3-6. Just to remind you, 3>2, 2>1, 1>0.

Larry

November 11th, 2009
7:57 am

I think that Teck’s offense can go against any team in the country. The problem is the defense. Until GT can get a top shelf defense, they will have problems being in the top five in the country.

GT Rules State

November 11th, 2009
7:57 am

ok big Willie, so where does that put UGA … pee wee?

Paul

November 11th, 2009
7:58 am

Why was this even written? What’s the point? Do you write articles like this MB about the falcons or braves? Nope. You have no way of knowing any of this and it’s meaningless to write since you don’t. And finally the sec has 3 ranked teams this year. It has refs keeping their top teams at the top. And an LSU team who has beaten not one ranked team. Yep that sure qualifies as a top conference. Retard

GT Rules State

November 11th, 2009
7:59 am

Pee wee Willie … how else does your imagination run? Loser

dgroy

November 11th, 2009
7:59 am

Ah Mark, Mark, Mark, Mark, Mark………To begin with, for the most part excluding Vandy, the SEC recruits football players to play in their football factories and they may, or may not, be real good students but, “They know how to play Football”. On the other hand we have the ACC who recruits Football Players who are, for the most part, “Good, smart Students” who also know how to “Play a little Football”. Now you might ask….”What is your point”? and my point is, “I don’t give a gnat’s a$$ if Georgia Tech could beat every team in the SEC on a regular basis, which, I agree, they can’t but, I would rather they play “With Class” in a Conference “With Class” than to play in the slime heavy SEC :)

calvin

November 11th, 2009
7:59 am

Unfortunately, sad to say, Tech is not that great. Every game
is a nail biter. Tech can’t dominate anyone. Wake Forest was
a near calamity. Anyone who thinks Duke will be a pushover is
crazy. Duke will pass all day, and Tech has little or no pass
defense. It’s great for Tech to be highly ranked, and for
Georgia to be unranked, but when the actual game is played, they
will be about equal, and Georgia is as likely to win as Tech.
Anyone who thinks Clemson can’t beat Tech is crazy. Clemson
beat Miami in Miami, and scored 27 straight points against Tech
in Atlanta. Tech would be more likely to beat its Orange Bowl
opponent, if it could get that far, than either Duke or Georgia
or Clemson. Tech’s ranking is pretty to see, but all it really
means is DANGER AHEAD. (Go Jackets; beat Dook, UGG, Clempson,
and win the Orange Bowl; then glory in the rankings.)

Tech '01

November 11th, 2009
8:00 am

Mark, I totally agree. I agree that Tech would be the fourth best team in the SEC and is the 5th best team in the nation, which is where I think Tech will end up in the final rankings.

Steve Davis

November 11th, 2009
8:00 am

I still remember the GT team that showed up for the Miami game. Abberation? No…..it’s in GT’s DNA.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
8:00 am

AZ Jacket

November 11th, 2009
8:00 am

I used to pull against UGA every weekend but now that the dawgs suck as a football team and having to listen to all the BS from the leg humpers it might be better if they won a few games just to shut them up. I hope that the UGA bloggers are not graduates of that fine Univeristy because you make some of the most lame brain comments I have ever heard. Yes we have some on the Tech side also and they have never seen the inside of a classroom or attended a game.

Rickety Bobo Willie

November 11th, 2009
8:01 am

Sounds logical Mark. What these fleabag fans don’t realize is last year is exactly that, LAST YEAR! Like the song says, “Yesterday is dead and gone”. Mutts went from pre season #1 last year to completely off the radar this year. Tech is trending up and UGA is, well, not trending UP!

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
8:02 am

gt, my imagination, just like my defense runs wild.

TECHnician

November 11th, 2009
8:02 am

Mark, What you are not taking into account is that IF Tech were in the SEC, they would have SEC talent.

AZ Jacket

November 11th, 2009
8:03 am

Jacketman, you need to assist the UGA fan with your symbols. > means greater than.

Hal

November 11th, 2009
8:03 am

Sometimes I think you sports writers like to throw articles out there like this sit back and watch some of us go nuts. It’s sort of like going to the Atlanta Aquarium and throwing a chicken in with the piranhas.

Tom

November 11th, 2009
8:04 am

Thru the games of this past weekend, the Sagarin strength of schedule (SoS) rankings…….

1. Washington
2. Washington State
3. UCLA
4. Virginia Tech
5. Florida State
6. Oregon
7. Southern California
8. San Jose State
9. Oregon State
10. Georgia
11. Miami (FL)
12. Georgia Tech
13. Virginia
14. Wake Forest
15. Stanford

Tech '01

November 11th, 2009
8:04 am

To everyone saying we wouldn’t cut it the SEC, we’ve blown out Vandy and Miss St this year, beat Auburn in recent years, beat UGA last year, and probably this year, Ole Miss refused to play us, Auburn turned us down for the Chick-fil-a Kickoff, we have upcoming home and homes with Alabama and South Carolina, so at least we’re trying to show everyone that we can hang.

Plus, if anyone thinks guys like Dwyer, Allen, Nesbitt, Thomas, Morgan, Burnett, Jefferson, Jones, etc. wouldn’t be stars in the SEC or anything conference is crazy. They are all going to the NFL, except Jones, who might be going to the MLB.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
8:04 am

AZ, i didnt graduate from uga but i sure like working there.

JDW

November 11th, 2009
8:05 am

I think at best they are fourth as MB writes. But I also think if they played Ole Miss, SC, and AR they would lose at least once…as for Georgia we will find out the answer to that soon enough.

Jon Cajun

November 11th, 2009
8:05 am

Good analysis. One thing you did not mention is the stadium/crowd factor. Another way to write the article would be, where would Vandy finish in the ACC since they are the only team with an ACC stadium?

GR82BAG8R

November 11th, 2009
8:05 am

The SEC has more BCS NCs than any other conference. The SEC has never lost a BCS NC title game. Auburn would have won the title if they had been given the chance. Anyone who questions the SEC’s pre-eminence in college football is ignoring the facts.

Georgia Tech’s current system would compete quite well in the SEC, once you get a better defense. Tech has the ability to compete with true scholar-athletes, as the AJC has reported that Tech’s football team has the highest SAT scores of any public university. That means that Tech is somewhat limited in its ability to recruit 4-5 star athletes. Florida does not have that barrier and is able to assemble a stable of elite athletes and coach them (two out of the last three BCS NCs is evidence). Georgia also recruits top notch talent, but doesn’t appear to have the ability to coach them to perform at the next level.

It will be interesting to see how Tech performs once Johnson gets his recruits in place.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
8:05 am

tech really hasnt been any good since AL said toe meets leather. and that was a long, long time ago friends.

Jake L

November 11th, 2009
8:06 am

I love how you ignore stats. Like Lsu barely beat Miss st even when getting +4 in the turnover margin. Like how GT beat MISS st by a larger margin than both LSU and FLa and likely Bama this week. Like how GT beat Vandy by a larger margin than Fla. Like vandy’s def holding sec teams to an average of around 22 and GT puts 56 on them.
But that LSU team who’s beaten
La Lafayette
Tulane
Miss st
Vandy
Ga
Wash
Auburn

Wow what big time wins! And Bama is just as bad. There only win is over LSU!! I’m telling you guys you are in for a rude awakening this year. The offenses in the sec are dismal. And it will show in the bowl games. Neither fla nor bama are the top 2 teams in the country. GT and Texas would beat both of them. You’ll see what begins to unfold soon.

Jacketman

November 11th, 2009
8:06 am

AZ Jacket, you are correct Sir…what was I thinking?

I wonder

November 11th, 2009
8:06 am

Do teams in other leagues just not recruit fast players? Or do SEC coaches have some ability to improve their speed so that they can compete with SEC SPEED!!!! Such garbage, unreal. Just stirring the pot aren’t we?

How about you rank where uga would be in the ACC? I say below GT, VT, Miami in the Coastal (on par with UNC) and below Clemson, FSU (with Ponder) in the Atlantic.

mash a bug

November 11th, 2009
8:06 am

omg! you continue to drink the kool-aid! NO DOUBT! ABSOLUTLELY NO DOUBT, TECH would consistently be near or at the bottom of the SEC teams.

Hal

November 11th, 2009
8:06 am

Tom,
Interesting the FSU played BYU and Miami played Oklahoma without Sam B. And Tech played 3 SEC teams.

PT

November 11th, 2009
8:06 am

LOL>Tech does not get it. When Tech loses its superstar QB, WR, and RB to the the NFL(Nesbit as a apecialty player) they will be the same ole Tech. LSU showed last yr what superior athletes with coaching will do to this Offense. Same with Miami. When UGA replaces Willy will be right back in the game. Tech would not be in the top half of the SEC. This year I would say they might be the 3rd best team. Coach PJ is having the luxury of a few great players running his show. Just imagine if Jabo Shaw was running this O. LMAO

Inhale, please?

November 11th, 2009
8:08 am

Bradley – You have stated several time this season that Tech is the “better program” when compared to UGA. But the truth is that every time you and Schultz write your drivel it becomes obvious that the perceived demise of the Georgia program is a bigger story than the so-called rise of Georgia Tech. So, in essence you are disproving your own theory every time you attempt to put Georgia down and build Tech up. You might as well quit while you’re behind!

B Watkins

November 11th, 2009
8:08 am

Did Miami have the speed to keep up with Georgia Tech?

Dawg Nation

November 11th, 2009
8:09 am

There’s absolutely no way that the nerds finish ahead of the Dawgs in the SEC. Even if the Dawgs are terrible and have the worst coaching, the nerds will always be worse. GT would just be another Vandy in the SEC. Our top rated recruiting classes always make us good, our records just doesn’t show it this year. Go DAWGS!

mash a bug

November 11th, 2009
8:10 am

38-3 december 2008. enough said. definitely bottom dwellers

Tech Tony

November 11th, 2009
8:11 am

I think toss-up between 3rd and 4th is about right. But in saying that, that could well make Tech the 3rd, 4th, or 5th best team in the nation because everybody to this point is trailing the SEC’s top 2, Florida and Alabama.

The SEC is not nearly as competitive as it makes itself out to be. Outside its top 3 teams (adding LSU to the top 2), only Tennessee is a better football team on this day than they were on the opening day of the season. Is Georgia better now than the day it beat South Carolina? Clearly not. Is Mississippi better now than it was when it achieved a short lived top 5 ranking? Again, a resounding no. The Gamecocks? They’ve hit their annual slide which doesn’t look like will end any time soon. There are other teams in the league that aren’t bad, but while we can say they are “not bad”, we’re not going to the length of saying they are “good”.

At the top, the SEC has without doubt 3 of the top teams out there, but all things considered, the whole “the SEC is best from top to bottom” myth rings hollow.

UGA

November 11th, 2009
8:11 am

The UGA Bulldogs rule. NUFF SAID!!

AZ Jacket

November 11th, 2009
8:12 am

Look in the dictionary for the meaning of idiot and you will find a picture of ‘PT’. The same dictionary gives the meaning of fear as ‘dawg fan’.

DawgMite

November 11th, 2009
8:13 am

No one wants to read dumb stories about GT. Stick with the relevant team in Georgia, Mark. The dawgs rule!!

Sautee Dawg

November 11th, 2009
8:15 am

Mark

You’ve lost it. Tech a team nobody wants to play right now? No defense!!!!!! Giving up 31 at Vandy and 27 at Wake??? You should have compared them to the Big East where nobody plays defense and you out score your opponent.
Congratulations to Tech this year they’ve really hung in there and have a good record,
Tech hasn’t played in a major bowl since 1966, maybe this year they’ll finally get to play in one.
In the SEC this year Tech would probably fall into 5th or 6th overall.

Reality

November 11th, 2009
8:15 am

I agree with mark Bradley as to where Tech would finish (4th) in the SEC (though I have some doubts as to whether or not they could beat Tennessee at this time in the season.). Definately Florida, Alabama & LSU are better than Tech, but Tech would probably lose to most other SEC teams if the Techies were not 100% that day. Of course that is true in their own conference. But as to anyone thinking that the ACC is the worst of the 6 major conferences they are dead wrong, WAY OFF BASE! The ACC is a pretty good football conference with a lot of parity.
My ranking of the conferences:
1. SEC
2. Big 12
3. (tie) ACC & Pac Ten
5. Big East
6. Big Ten

There is no doubt that the Big Ten is the by far the worst of the 6 major conferences!!!! Actually the Big Ten is probably just a hair better than Conference USA, the WAC and the Mountain West.

Tom

November 11th, 2009
8:16 am

“Georgia fans are passionate, but let’s face it – they’re not the brightest fans. Passionate, but not bright.”Eric Zeier, November 21, 2001

Good Grief

November 11th, 2009
8:17 am

I agree, 4th or 5th is about right. Also worth mentioning is that in those three ACC/SEC match-ups all three of those games came off of long breaks. A month long break basically in the GT/LSU match up last year and then in the other two games both teams have two seasons (Spring, Summer) to prepare for a game.

Now, I guess we could say in both the Bama/Clemson and Bama/VaTech game that talent stuck out but I’d even go as far to say coaching. I’d like to see what would have happened to LSU had they not had 4 weeks to prepare to face Tech and had only 4 to 5 days. The same goes for Bama…I think if these ACC/SEC games were played on back to back weeks that we would see even better games

WalMartDawg

November 11th, 2009
8:18 am

evrbody n my tralur park knoz da dawgs ar reely da best ov bowth confrensez. They jus don have a gud qb dis yur

jus wat till nex yur yu nats! weel wip ur buts up btween da hegez an mak u lik it!

MASSDAWG

November 11th, 2009
8:18 am

VERY ACCURATE MARK!!!!

38-3 !!!!!!!!!!!!!hahahahahahahahahaha

Eric

November 11th, 2009
8:20 am

Who cares? It’s irrelevant.

Mr. Attendance

November 11th, 2009
8:20 am

Even as well as Georgia Tech is doing this year they still cannot fill up their cute little stadium. While UGA having a bad year puts 80,000 in the stands even to see the Dawgs play a nobody like Tennessee Tech.

Serious football is played in stadiums in the SEC that are huge and packed out! The ACC on the other hand has serious basketball arenas, but quaint little football stadiums.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
8:20 am

and zier is an idiot. cover 2 is all he can say on a broadcast.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
8:22 am

The SEC is the best conference in the land, but the SEC fans who act like playing an ACC schedule is a ‘cupcake’ schedule are poorly informed. There is talent in the ACC which is sometimes marginally coached (like it is over there in Athens). All four of Clemson’s DL will play on Sundays as will a couple of their DBs. Everyone of UNC’s LB run sub 4.5, and they have a couple of future NFL DLs too. It’s not all about VT, Miami and FSU in our conference. And that Wake team you dawgs poo poo? Last year they had the top LB taken in the draft along with a couple of other defensive players. Wake would hang with the South Carolinas, Ole Misses and Arkys of the SEC.

Tampa Wreck

November 11th, 2009
8:22 am

Enter your comments here

Hey Dogtards

November 11th, 2009
8:22 am

You are an idiot. It has nothing to do with “SEC Speed,” whatever that is. Vandy certainly doesn’t have “SEC Speed.” I’d venture a guess that neither does Kentucky, Georgia, South Carolina, Ole Miss, Miss St, Auburn, Arkansas, Tennessee, etc. Unless you are talking about Eric Berry. I think what you may mean by “SEC Speed” is “Florida Speed.” They are the only team in the SEC that plays at another gear on defense that no other team has.

I think a more reliable comparison is the strength of the D-Lines. That’s the primary reason why LSU beat Tech last year – well, that and a missed catch in the end zone, a recovered onside kick, a muffed punt return, and a failed 4th and short on Tech’s own 20. That’s the same reason Clempson “shut down” GT, even though they ceded over 300 yards rushing (I think).

It has nothing to do with cornerback speed or safety speed. Those guys are making tackles at least 3-4 yards downfield. If they are the ones “containing” the option, you are in trouble.

The main difference is the ends. If you have big, quick D-Ends, they can get around Tech’s (intentionally) undersized tackles and force the run to the inside. That’s the only speed you need on the team. The rest is making sure your DTs are big enough to clog the middle to stop Dwyer, and that your middle linebacker has enough of a nose for the ball to stop him when he squirts through.

Again, nothing to do with “SEC Speed” (whatever that is). Has everything to do with a top notch D-Line.

UGA89

November 11th, 2009
8:25 am

Tech would be a top tier team in the SEC, there is no question. Reason being you simply remove the fallacy that the SEC is that much better than the ACC –because it is not. That is nothing more than media hype by ESPN/ABC because of their contract with the SEC.

Moot topic

November 11th, 2009
8:25 am

This is moot and irrelevant like uga because gt DOESN’T play in the SEC. It’s not 1960. I still don’t get why so many of you are fooled this year by these sec teams.

Lsu hasn’t beaten one ranked team.
Bama has beaten one.
Fla hasn’t done so either.

All 3 have played 2 ooc cupcakes and Bama and Fla have 3. The refs though have made sure their lack of any offense keeps them undefeated. Eventually though it will show. And what everyone outside of the sec rose colored glasses has been saying will show. That the sec is not that good this year.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
8:25 am

Mr. Attendance, I’d rather have our fans. I’d rather have 45,000 of our fans than 90,000 ‘tards with mullets and overalls.

Gold Stinger

November 11th, 2009
8:27 am

Mark:

It looks like you have run out of topics (GT is NOT on the SEC and it is not likely to be)…well here is some help:

“Local” – With GT win over the UGA this year, is the rivalry back?

“Records”- With PJ/GT having many first wins this year, which GT/UGA game firsts can be broken?

“Recruiting”- Since the UGA regularly ranks top 10 in recruiting, is coaching worth 30 spots or more for GT which had ranks 40th~50th in recruiting?

“Patriotic”- With Navy’s success using PJ system and GT proving that it can score on any team, will the system “spread” in whole or in part?

GO GT !!

MattyB

November 11th, 2009
8:27 am

Mark,
Very well said. I’m a Tech fan, born and bred. But I think this article is just about spot-on. However, I do see the scales tipping ever so slowly and think that GT will begin to command more national respect in the coming years as we step up and play more games against the heavy-hitters of the SEC and show that a well executed, highly technical game plan can surmount sheer brawn.

UGASlobberknocker

November 11th, 2009
8:29 am

The only reason for this column was to stir up the Georgia fans.I wish you would write a real column every now and then. If Tech were in the ACC they would be a bottom feeder most years..they would be another South Carolina at best..good every now and then but bad just as often..except SC has fans that go to the game. of course we all know Tech doesnt.attendance wise Tech would be 11th ahead of only Vandy.

Scott

November 11th, 2009
8:30 am

Reality you are anything but.
Big 12 #2? They are worse than the sec with ranked teams with only 2.

John DUIberry

November 11th, 2009
8:32 am

I think these Jack(off)ets are as good as the ‘85 team, of which I was the kwahtabak.

Here’s to hangin’ fiddy on each defense we got left.

Burp!

Gt4ever

November 11th, 2009
8:33 am

Everybody who is a REAL GT fan needs to email Dan R. We don’t just need to talk about where we would be in the SEC, we need to be back in the league, where we belong! The fact that we chose to leave was the beginning of the end of GT football. We need to do anything we can do to re-enter the SEC. It would make us a national powerhouse, once again. We could recruit with anyone, and we could finally find a way to fill our stadium on Saturday’s. I personally don’t believe we have the talent overall to compete at the level that the top teams in the SEC, as noted in the chicken bowl. That was no aberration, it was a good old fashion beating. It’s still kinda funny to listen to GT fans rationalize that loss, special teams, miscues, or whatever. Duh, that is all part of the game. One thing was not mistaken, we were manhandled, our azzes were beat. Plain and simple!

FBR

November 11th, 2009
8:33 am

Being a Vandy Grad gives me a unique perspective on UGA and Tech. Congrats to Tech for having a very good team this year, but you Tech fans are delusional. You’ve got to realize that you’re not a top tier program like Georgia or Al or TN and everone knows it, and you never will be. Every decade or so you’ll come to the table with a competitive team, sit back and enjoy what you have and quit thinking you’ll always be king of the hill, it just wont happen.

Bryan Black

November 11th, 2009
8:37 am

Did you even see the Clemson vs. Gt game? Clemson spotted them 21 points. Tech went 8 or 9 series without converting a third or fourth down. And SEC like ACC referees determined GT was the class of the ACC and propeeld them to victory much the same as they aided and abetted Florida and Alabama in the SEC. Here’s hoping we get another shot at Tech!

godawg

November 11th, 2009
8:38 am

PUHLEEZE! They were in before but they chickened out and joined the basketball conference. Good riddance to bad rubbish!

GTFAN

November 11th, 2009
8:38 am

Georgia Tech does need to be back in the SEC. That way we could get better recruits, money for the athletic department, and play real football teams each week. The ACC is a joke in football.

3 DAWG KNIGHT

November 11th, 2009
8:42 am

3RD IN SEC East and 3rd in SEC west

GTman

November 11th, 2009
8:42 am

While I think we could win 1 game against any team, I think we would probably lose two out of the three against UF, AL, LSU and I think we would be favored against everybody else in the SEC.

There is no team in the country that could go 3-0 against the teams above and only one team (UF or AL) will win 2 games against the SEC big 3 and the winner of the SEC championship will win by at least 2 TDs against whoever their opponent is in the BCS game.

The SEC (best football conference by far) produces a great champion that is tested and proven once they get through that league. The SEC produces more NFL talent than any other conference, so of course after facing more NFL caliber talent the SEC champ can easily handle their NC opponent.

THWG! We still own the Dawgs!

GThor

November 11th, 2009
8:44 am

Re: whether Tech would beat Tennessee? Depends on what part of the schedule we got them. Early in the season we’d have beat them, but they’re a different team now. They were a botched FG away from beating Bama @ Bama for Pete’s sake! Tennessee could give anyone they played trouble right now.

F-105 Thunderchief

November 11th, 2009
8:44 am

If Tech were in the SEC, would they necessarily have SEC talent? Hmmm. Vanderbilt is in the SEC, is academically challenging and doesn’t have SEC talent. I’m guessing the scholarship benefits are the same, or do even scholarship players at Vandy face high private school costs?

dcbl

November 11th, 2009
8:44 am

LSU played a hell of a game against Abalama (sic)

I’m a GA boy living in Hoover (which is Birmingham’s version of Dunwoody or Alph-forever…)

GA Tech would be at LEAST the 3rd best team in the SEC & maybe the 2nd best team. BUT, anyone who thinks they would have ‘no shot’ to win the conference is deceiving themself.

UGA had LSU probably beat. But for an insane call, LSU would have likely lost to the Georgia Bulldogs. Sure, the Tigers ripped off a hell of a drive, but that bad penalty & the resulting field position that the Tigers got really took the wind out of Georgia’s sails.

Don’t get me wrong. Nothing would make me happier than to see the Dawg’s ruin Tech’s season (unless it resulted in CMR deciding that his staff is just fine as it is…). But it ain’t going to happen (or rather, it ain’t likely).

LSU may not even be able to beat Ole Miss (we’ll find out soon enough). They would be at least a 3.5 point dog to the Jackets.

Not gonna say that MB is an idiot :-)

BUT – I will say that my picks this year (both against the line and straight up) are better than Jeff Schultz’s…

http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=216484&forum_id=53

http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=216486&forum_id=53

http://perspectives.com/forums/view_topic.php?id=216440&forum_id=5

Would love to see Mark join the fun on the weekly picks…

greg

November 11th, 2009
8:45 am

Let’s see. Tech got killed by Miami, dominated by Clemson for most of the game after a few lucky plays in the 1st quarter and won at the end after a blown call against Clemson, took overtime to beat an average Wake Forest team, and just beat Florida State. They easily could have 4 loses and would not be in the top 25. Come on…they ain’t that good. Clemson wins big in the ACC championship game.

3 DAWG KNIGHT

November 11th, 2009
8:45 am

Third place in both SEC East and west.

Paddy

November 11th, 2009
8:46 am

Teddy…you got part of it correct. That 9 in the box analogy does not wash. Early this pre-season CPJ was asked the same question. More or less he answered it this way. Teams have stacked the line against me and we still won. I have seen it all. Eventually somebody is going to make a mistake and we are going to score. The man knows his offense! Don’t have any stats to disprove you Teddy but my guess is that there is not a 5 lbs difference overall in the size of the lineman in the SEC vs the ACC. Hope somebody checks this out.

VT Yellow Jacket

November 11th, 2009
8:47 am

Tech loses to LSU 38-3 last year. I think there are 2 major reasons for that.
1) Tech’s level of success was completely unexpected last season, and there was a let down. That was based on immaturity. I don’t think it’ll happen anymore.
2) LSU had 4 weeks to prepare for the spread option. Time will tell if this type of prep time makes a difference. If it does, then we’ll see a lot of disappointing ends to otherwise successful seasons. If CPJ is right, the extra time won’t matter. I think he is right!

BTW, what’s with the stupid “first!” posts? Sheesh, get over it.

WRECKED TECH

November 11th, 2009
8:47 am

Third place in either division.

3 DAWG KNIGHT

November 11th, 2009
8:48 am

What are you crazy dude!

Saint

November 11th, 2009
8:48 am

I’m a die hard Jackets fan, but i’m also realistic. So with that said, i would have to agree with you on that.

3 DAWG KNIGHT

November 11th, 2009
8:50 am

Bradley…I see you are censoring your column…what ever happened to freedom of press and speach?

Tiger Fan 29229

November 11th, 2009
8:51 am

GT looked like Apollo Creed at the end of Rocky I in the 4th qtr of the Clemson game. They were scared. They knew they were going to escape, barely. However, they didn’t want to get hit anymore. ACCCG is neutral site and Clemson’s defense and offense are in a much better place than the first go around. GT stay in the ATL for the Chik-Fil-A Bowl and the Tigers go the the Orange to avenge their loss against TCU. Mark it down GT is our next Tombstone on the practice field.

The Real SugarHillDawg

November 11th, 2009
8:51 am

You Tech fans have forgotten what happened when you all left the conference and played a team from the SEC with superior talent didn’t you??CPJ is a good coach and does the best with what he has BUT he can’t compete with Good coaching with GREAT talent! I know the truth hurts.UGA will be the second team you all play this year that has comparable talent to Miami and what happened then??Our running game is gonna be going then and AJ well……. is gonna be AJ and it’s gonna be a shootout again.

WRECKED TECH

November 11th, 2009
8:51 am

Possibly as high as #2,but without much of a passing game I don’t know.

NY Jacket

November 11th, 2009
8:52 am

Mark,

We are going to find out when Tech starts playing Alabama again. Seems to me when GT was in the SEC, they had no problem beating Florida, Georgia, Auburn, Tennessee, et al. Even Bear Bryant had real respect for how tough Georgia Tech was.

My high school coaches in Jacksonville played at Florida and Alabama and they told me that Georgia Tech was the hardest hitting team they ever played and let me know that I would fit in at Tech and get a great education.

Things have not changed.

Does it matter where TECH would finish

November 11th, 2009
8:53 am

The fact is, this is a rediculous conversation. We don’t know where Tech would finish in the SEC, they could finish first or tenth – we really don’t know. Just like we don’t know where Georgia would finish in the ACC. Teams can only schedule non-conference games to challenge them the most and then play the schedule in front of them. Kudos to Tech for scheduling three SEC teams this year and upcoming series against Kansas, Alabama and Auburn (again). Shame on Florida for Charleston Southern and FIU.

67King

November 11th, 2009
8:53 am

Tech would be close to the top. Folks, it doesn’t matter if you give up 30 points when you score on darn near every drive. Vandy punted 7 times, Tech once. We did NOT punt against FSU. What types of teams give Tech’s defense a hard time? Good passing teams. Wake had 20 yards rushing against us. We’d take Bama to the woodshed. We’d be competitive against UF. Ole Miss may be the most threatening team in the SEC, because of the matchup. What you miss with the point about “speed” is that when you can gain 4-6 yards on nearly every play up the middle, you nullify the speed. And sheesh, it almost helps us in the event you didn’t see the 11 minute drive against Va Tech. If you just look at the 2008 score against LSU, you miss that they only outgained us by 10 yards. Scores don’t mean anything if you are speculating. Look at yards gained, yards per play, etc. Those are the stats that give the better indication. Besides, in 2008, we beat the third place team, UGA……since you use 2008 to justify the position. BTW….in 2008-2009, since the article pulls up both, Tech is 4-1, going on 5-1 against the SEC.

Not to mention the fact that every coach we face talks about the near impossibility of preparing for us in a short period of time. Urban Meyer is the only coach in the SEC who even belongs in the same breath as Paul Johnson.

GT_Paula

November 11th, 2009
8:53 am

Tech would do better in the SEC than UGA does. And Tech is on the way up, while UGA is tanking, probably to become a 2nd-tier team for at least the next few years until they decide to hire a new coach to turn it around.

My opinion.

acowa

November 11th, 2009
8:54 am

I wish GT would schedule more games with SEC teams. We have a home and home with BAMA coming up in a few years. Should be interesting enough. Wonder if Saban and CPJ will still be coaching when it hits.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
8:54 am

greg, so then by your standards a UF team that beat Arkansas on a blown call, let Miss St hang around just as much as Tech did, let Tennessee hang around early in the season when they weren’t very good, barely got by LSU, played an EMBARRASING OOC slate, and only scored 27 on a Vandy team Tech hung 56 on must not really be very good?

Old Gold Britches

November 11th, 2009
8:54 am

I have to agree with Calvin except Tech is pretty good offensively, and they are getting better defensively each week. This team believes in what they are capable of doing and has the mind set to get it done. I cannot think of another coach I would want to get me there.

Also, let’s take a look at the “Sagarin strength of schedule” for the top of the rankings:

Florida 42
Alabama 25
TCU 47
Texas 52
Cincinnati 67
Oregon 8
Boise St. 82
LSU 17

At least give the mutts a little credit for the S of S.

Dawg Tired

November 11th, 2009
8:55 am

I think if Tech played Tennessee today that UT would win. I believe that Florida, Bama, LSU and UT would all get penetration with their front four and that is the key to busting up the option. Let’s be honest with each other. Tech’s defense is as bad as ours. I’m not hating on Tech. They are better than we are and I’ll have to live with that fact for another long year.

BankerDawg

November 11th, 2009
8:56 am

I agree with most who have Tech third, ahead of LSU. I cannot understand what LSU has done this year to garner so much respect, other than lose to Bama and Florida, which, I guess some view as “impressive”.

Here is their schedule:

9/5 at Washington W 31-23
9/12 Vanderbilt W 23-9
9/19 UL Lafayette W 31-3
9/26 at Miss State W 30-26
10/3 at Georgia W 20-13
10/10 Florida L 13-3
10/17 OPEN DATE
10/24 Auburn W 31-10
10/31 at Tulane W 42-0
11/7 at Alabama L 24-15
11/14 Louisiana Tech
11/21 at Ole Miss
11/28 Arkansas

I just don’t see it. The fact they are #8 in the BCS is a testament to the idiocy of preseason polls versus any on field achievements this year.

Honestly, I haven’t seen anything terribly impressive in the SEC all year, but we are getting the benefit of the doubt from the media, and Florida, Bama, and LSU were all highly regarding coming into the season, which is how LSU has hung around.

It’s not just the SEC, look at the Pac 10 with USCw #9 with two losses, one of which is to a SIX LOSS Washington….and tOSU in the Big Televen, ranked # 11 with two losses, one to a SIX LOSS Purdue team.

Awful.

Anyway, back on topic, I think Tech would have performed very well this year, at least #3 in the SEC….and no one wants to play them in a playoff, I guarantee it.

GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO DAWGS! SIC ‘EM! BEAT AUBURN!

j

November 11th, 2009
8:56 am

Mark,

I hate to break the news to you, but you are wrong. LSU almost lost to UGAY. UGAY, as we all know, is horrible! They would be first or second in the west. Tennessee showed the country that Alabama is not all that. What a horse $hit shock jock story. It is pathetic that you have nothing to do now because UGAY is so bad!

The Real YellowJacket

November 11th, 2009
8:56 am

Always ahead of the puppies.

XXXVII

November 11th, 2009
8:57 am

I assume they’d be in the SEC east. So it would depend on which SEC west teams they played in a given year. If they play Ole Miss, LSU, Bama they’ll lose those plus they’ll lose to Florida, UGA, and maybe Tennessee in the east so that’d put them near the bottom. If they had Miss St and Arkansas on the schedule they’d have a few less losses and be somewhere in the middle.

Gt4ever

November 11th, 2009
8:57 am

F-105, GT can and does elect to take marginal student athletes. We could recruit with the big guys and would be a very good football team. I have NO idea what Vandy’s requirements admitting football players have been, we can speculate that they don’t put as much priority in allowing marginal students, which would explain their win loss record. For all the GT fans who would disagree with the fact that we have different guide lines for athletes…. We recruit the same players that UGA does and all the rest of the football factories.

GT_Paula

November 11th, 2009
8:58 am

“Tech is pretty good offensively, and they are getting better defensively each week. This team believes in what they are capable of doing and has the mind set to get it done.”

A perfect assessment, and this is exactly what UGA does not have and will never have with the kind of undisciplined, unprincipled players that Mark Richt recruits.

skydawg

November 11th, 2009
9:00 am

I can’t wait for the Dawgs to once again beat down the Nerds and shut all this “Tech is this and Tech is that talk”. I can’t wait to see all those dejected looks on the faces of the 2/3 full stadium. Tech is a joke and this flash in the pan mentality cracks me up. You can bank on this Nerds…the Dawgs will ruin your season. So make sure not to bring any sharp objects, like a compass point or sharpened slide rule. Wouldn’t want you to hurt yourself when you realize how much of a joke you are. That a mediocre (by Dawg standards) UGA team beats you down like the redheaded step child you are. It will happen..take it to the bank.

good morning buggies!!!

November 11th, 2009
9:01 am

absolutely lmao, 17 days till tech goes up against the sec again, hmm, good luck between the slums at grunt stadium

VegasGT

November 11th, 2009
9:02 am

First of all, the whole point of this article was to say where MB thought this year’s GT team would finish in this year’s SEC. I do not think he is that far off if everyone performed to expectations. I think it would be a toss-up with LSU. I also think they could end up higher or lower, but the assumption is based on averages.

What would happen if GT’s defense got better or when PJ’s recruits fill out the ranks is just another if. You could easily say “if Meyer went to ND, if Sagan had a stroke, if Miles choaked on some crawfish, if anyone’s recruiting did not live up to expectations (talk to Richt about this one), etc.”

It just doesn’t matter because it is not reality. Reality is that anyone can win on any given Saturday. That is why they play the games. Each game has it’s own unique set of circumstances and challenges that can turn a game one way or another.

I thought it was an interesting topic, but not of much consequence to deliberate too long.

tech is afraid to join the sec

November 11th, 2009
9:03 am

tech doesn’t have the athletes to play a full sec schedule , maybe to compete with vandy and miss.state, but not Georgia, tenn, fla. , alabama, and lsu all in the same year, Stay in that weak forest sister of a conference insect team and thrive in your feminine little beehive, roflmao

Bama Aaron

November 11th, 2009
9:03 am

I agree with you Mark. The Tech’ers would be about 4th…maybe 5th as I think the Vol defense is probably good enough to stop them.
But for all the crying their fans are doing on here they’ve really got to take a step into reality. Option offense is based on the fact that the opposing D won’t show enough displine to play all the options. UF and Bama…especially Bama have two of the most displined D’s in the country…couple that with speed that is probably greater than your offense and you’ll be lucky to score 10.

oh but tech will beat Georgia

November 11th, 2009
9:04 am

we always beat Georgia, they aren’t even a threat this year!

Gringo

November 11th, 2009
9:04 am

Sorry but I gotta roll with Tech beating UF. Maybe not Alabama, but UF for certain.

Steady GT Fan

November 11th, 2009
9:06 am

I agree with Mark on his placement of Tech and his rational. Tech’s offensive system is now proven and gives Tech some advantages (most teams do not see it often, it wears down defenses, it doesn’t give them a break, it reduces the advantages of one or two great defensive players to reak havock on an offense, it lifts all levels of players through a good system). We should be competitive each year if Paul continues to have the passion he presently has on the offensive side.

But, for Tech to take the next step, recruiting on the defensive side is the key. To play with the best of the best you need defensive talent (big, athletic, quick, fast, intelligent players). That will come over time as players want to play for winners.

Go Tech!

Tampa Wreck

November 11th, 2009
9:06 am

I’ll give you Florida and Alabama. They’re undefeated and likely better than GT this year based on strong defenses, but I think we finish ahead of LSU.

Gt4ever

November 11th, 2009
9:07 am

skydawg…. Lay off the caffeine. It will be your undoing! UGA could beat us, but the odds are against that happening. Here is hoping for GT to hang 50 on your sorry azze team!

Jim R.

November 11th, 2009
9:07 am

GT fans that keep making statements like “GT will be consistently competing for NCs” are deluding themselves as they do on a variety of subjects. NO ACC team will consistently compete for NCs anytime soon because of the overall weakness of the conference. Another factor is that unless you are FSU, VT, and maybe Cemson, ACC fans are notorious no shows at bowl games with GT maybe the worst. GT has the worst rep in America when it comes to supporting their team with their attendance and travel. For the time being the SEC and Big 12, USC, and Ohio St. are the odds on favorites to remain the teams most likely to see NC games. Hell, GT can’t even jump johnny come latelys like TCU and Cincinnati. There’s a reason for that. GT killed the city of Jacksonville when they last made it to the ACC title game and now just mention of GT in that game makes the sponsor city cringe.

why are we discussing tech and the sec

November 11th, 2009
9:07 am

stay with duke, virginia, wake and unc, and definitely Jacksonville State, are they in the Acc , what state is Jacksonville state in , roflmao, nice schedule buggies!!!!!! ole miss would be ranked 7th in the bcs with that sister of schedule!!! roflmao

SEC Fact Check .com

November 11th, 2009
9:08 am

Mark, I agree with AL and FL but I would at least call the LSU a draw. Yes, last year’s LSU whooped up on Tech. Turnovers and special team screw-ups cost that game for Tech.

Comparing how VA Tech played AL just after losing their starting running back and how LSU played AL, I would say VA Tech and LSU are fairly even. In fairness GA Tech in not hugely better than than VA Tech but did indeed beat VA Tech. So, this is my only bases for comparing LSU to GA Tech.

Need a playoff system to prove me wrong, or to prove you wrong, or to prove . . . .

BartBuzz

November 11th, 2009
9:09 am

It must be a slow blog day. I didn’t even finish reading the article because it’s a dumb question to ponder. GT’s not in the SEC and won’t be. Tech is leading the ACC and will be 3-0 against the SEC come December.

Go Jackets….beat Duke! Then it’s up with the White and Gold, down with the Red and Black! THWG.

Dan

November 11th, 2009
9:09 am

I’m a bit confused by some of the comments. Some have said that we can’t throw and so we could not win. But, Tennessee can’t throw either and they seemed pretty competitive against UF and Bama (I won’t even mention what happened in UGA game). Others have said our defense isn’t good enough. But has anyone bothered to watch Auburn, UGA, or Arkansas. We’d likely finish second or thrid in the SEC.

EDGE

November 11th, 2009
9:09 am

All I’m saying is, you can’t ignore facts! We may have just beaten UGA for the first time in years, but look at some of the other SEC matchups we have had. We beat Auburn both times we played them when they had Ronnie Brown and Cadillac Williams, good thing they didnt play us that undefeated years-huh. We beat Vandy two years when they had Jay Cutler, and we did all that with Chan Gailey at the helm. Now with Coach Johnson we are 4-1 against the SEC foes we have played. So really, why do people keep saying we can’t compete or are they just biased SEC homers?!

15 fans!!

November 11th, 2009
9:09 am

I thought the bugnation took 15 fans to Jacksonville last time they made a bowl there, roflmao, nice fair weather fan base!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

SEC Fact Check .com

November 11th, 2009
9:11 am

Jim R.

FSU did so for a LONG TIME. Your point is not valid. Back then, the knock on the ACC was we ONLY had FSU. Now, we have alot of good teams but no one dominant team.

I think it is the non-ACC spin . . . .

Edge..as in dull edge

November 11th, 2009
9:11 am

cause you can’t beat Florida, Alabama and Lsu, moron…and you are 1 and 7 against georgia this century!! clue in

Otto

November 11th, 2009
9:11 am

Vandy and Miss st. both hung 31 on GT?

The only games Vandy put up more were 34 on Rice and 45 on Western Kentucky. Miss St. put up 45 on Jack St the only game where they scored more.

Vandy and Miss St. are last and tied for their last in their divisions.

IMO GT could finish 3rd in the west and possibly as high as 2nd in the East if they had an easy schedule from the west. If the played Bama, LSU, and UF I think they could drop to 4th in a division.

LSU in the Top 10? No they are not as good as years past but who is?

Thanks to the parity that is destroying college football the top 3 are clear and past that 25 teams can flip a coin for their ranking.

chess conference

November 11th, 2009
9:12 am

i hear the acc is good at chess! maybe just a rumor, roflmao

Dan

November 11th, 2009
9:12 am

Also, do ACC folks get to point out that when Wake beat Ole Miss last year all we heard was how it was only Ole Miss so it didn’t really matter…except that when that same time beat UF we heard how that proved how tough the SEC is. But don’t let facts get in the way of your point.

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHA

November 11th, 2009
9:12 am

GT would absolutely not be in the top 2 or 3 in either side of the SEC. That’s the funniest thing I’ve read in a while. Way to stir up the pot on a rainy Veterans day.

Instead, how about a good journalistic story on some Georgia vets who played sports in the state. Maybe high school standouts who went to war from our state. Anything? Bueler???

RedKneckerson

November 11th, 2009
9:13 am

I noticed Tenn. was nowhere on the Bradley list of SEC rankings. He did throw a bone to UGA and Carolina ( Iguess he thinks they are the teams closet to UF) Odd that UT beat the piss out of both of them. Also odd that only Carolina scored an offensive TD on the UT defense. Odd too that defense would be a way to stop the GT offense. Perhaps I missed something?

TC

November 11th, 2009
9:14 am

GT is no better than 4th in either division of the SEC right now. With their defense they would have problems with even teams like Arkansas, USC, and Auburn. Tennessee would kill them with their running attack and Monte Kiffin would kill that triple option. GT might be able to beat Vandy and Kentucky consistently but forget it against the rest of the league. GT would be a perrenial 6-6 or 7-5 team and a mid tier to bottom feeder in the conference. With the recruiting classes (49th and 52nd) that PJ has signed they would fare even worse in the future. Of course their recruiting would probably get better were they in the SEC.

SEC Fact Check .com

November 11th, 2009
9:15 am

15 fans . . .

We aren’t throwing out diplomas at every stop light along North Ave. 35,000 students compared to 18,000. Our alumni move further out than Lilburn or Lawenceville after graduation.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
9:16 am

‘GT has the worst rep in America when it comes to supporting their team with their attendance and travel’. Oh, please, cease with the Dawg propaganda. No, we don’t travel well to the dang Chan Gailey Nut Bowl across the country, but we travel as well or better than the majority of ACC teams locally (except Clemson and VT definitely- FSU fans are fickle depending on whether their team is good or not, and Miami doesn’t have a lot of loyal fans, they are a media creation) . If we keep winning and whipping what Randy Cross of CBS Sports called ‘The most overrated and underachieving program in America’, UGA, we’ll draw more fans. But hopefully not the snaggle-toothed moron variety who carry on romantic affairs with their farm animals. You can keep them up in Athens.

dan..dork..bug

November 11th, 2009
9:16 am

you wouldn’t be ranked in the top ten in the bcs..you benefit from your ACC schedule and you still can’t get ranked ahead of tcu, boise and Cincinatti, thats what the bcs thinks of the acc schedule you play

Poorbrave

November 11th, 2009
9:16 am

Enter your comments here

cherokee

November 11th, 2009
9:17 am

oh but tech will beat Georgia …..November 11th, 2009
9:04 am we always beat Georgia, they aren’t even a threat this year! Tech has beaten Ga once in 8 years. Please explain your thinking. You may beat them this year, but they are your biggest rival so they will be a threat

SEC Fact Check .com

November 11th, 2009
9:17 am

TC . . . We had a Home and Home with Auburn under Chan Gailey. Enough said . . .

A new Direction

November 11th, 2009
9:17 am

2008 was Coach Paul Johnson’s first year for God’s sake. Was there suppose to be a big surprise that GT finished 9-4? It is like you want the SEC to put shame on GT. Give it another year before you start to point the finger. The shame lies in UGA, after years of talk of five star recruiting, blah, blah blah what have they done lately? NOTHING

Tom

November 11th, 2009
9:18 am

Gt4ever, not quite….

From a simply quantifiable standpoint, the admissions requirements for Tech student-athletes are still higher than the NCAA minimums (even with the bump in NCAA req’s from a year or so ago).

sec fast check bugman

November 11th, 2009
9:18 am

where do they move …dorkville? u couldn’t travel much to decent bowls , heck you nerds have played on the blue field in boise almost as much as the home team there…course you lost to the bulldawgs out there too…the Fresno State bulldawgs..roflmao

Tech sucks

November 11th, 2009
9:20 am

Yeah we saw what Tech could do against an LSU team that UGA crushed last year AT LSU. GT got their asses handed to them. They would finish 4th in the East at best.

soon to be 2/0

November 11th, 2009
9:20 am

against the Slightly Educated Conf dogs.

Cherokee..we own Georgia

November 11th, 2009
9:20 am

Tech has dominated Georgia since the rivalry Began…roflmao

TC

November 11th, 2009
9:20 am

GThor you really showed for the ACC tite game didn’t you. And that was after all you whining little girls said win and we’ll show. Yeah right! You still aren’t showing in your own stadium for the biggest games of your season. You guys are monumental posers when it comes to supporting your team with meat in the seats. And facts back that up. Attendance figures just don’t lie and empty seats show up on TV.

Tom

November 11th, 2009
9:21 am

d..d..b,

Then how does Tech have a strength of schedule ranking of #12, playing an ACC schedule? Why are there 6 ACC teams in the top 15 SoS’s? (compared to one SEC team).

GT Bob

November 11th, 2009
9:22 am

Mark has really leaned how to stir the blog pot, but GT is not in the SEC and never will be. GT needs to just keeping winning games one at a time and let everything else take its course.

DHD

November 11th, 2009
9:22 am

Stupid article. If Mark Bradley was at the NY Times, he would be in dead last….if he could get a job at all. How about writing about real news instead of a hypothetical?

A new Direction

November 11th, 2009
9:23 am

that Bama record sure is something to be proud of beating powerhouses like Troy, FIU and North Texas. and Florida with FIU, Charleston Southern(Baptist College) and Chattanooga…Shameful cr@p…wow so intimidating

Saint Simons

November 11th, 2009
9:23 am

sec plays alot of cupcake teams, thats why they look so good !!!

I AM a Homer

November 11th, 2009
9:25 am

want to talk difference in SEC and ACC?????

SEC- finsih the season with only one loss, and a conference championship, you are all but guaranteed a sopt in the BCS Nat’l Championship Game

ACC- finish the season with only one loss, and a conference championship, nobody outside of Mark Bradley and Jeff Schultz talks about you. You are given a spot in the Orange Bowl where you will play overranked Cincinnatti, TCU or Boise State, who will still beat your gimmick high school offense.

Can somebody PLEASE tell me who Georgia Tech has beaten, and just what exactly they have accompished under their High School Offense??? YES, I know they beat UGA last year, who was struggling heavily at the time, and problems were obvious. Other than the techies getting a partial over that win, WHAT IN THE WORLD HAVE YOU ACCOMPLISHED????

to follow up that heralded win over UGA, not only did you get rings made, you got embarassed against a struggling LSU team in the CFA bowl.

Who have you beaten this year?? Jacksonville State (AL)?, Clemson?, UNC?, SEC powerhouse MIss St?, SEC Powerhouse Vandy?, 1990’s powerhouse FSU?, Virginia?, Wake Forrest in Overtime

You Techies are hillarious. you beat UGA for the 12th time since 1965 under a gimmick driven head coach and you paint him gold and think your team is the best in the nation. I would LOVE for UGA to have your schedule this year and every year. You wouldn’t make it 4 games in the SEC with your coach and gimmick high school offense before your fans were calling for his head.

Good luck recruiting a QB, RB or WR to play your gimmicks after this non-PJ recruitment class is gone. NOBODY wants to run that if they desire to play at a higher level. What NFL scout or team says “oh, check this kid out, he knows the wittle twipple option so well, he would make it past Ray Lewis or John Abraham!!!

TO HELL WITH GEORGIEA TECH AND IT’S BLIND FAN BASE!!!!!

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
9:27 am

I get so tired of the criticism of Mark. He is an excellent, incisive and intellegent writer. Just go back and check all those columns when he’s called me the greatest defensive coordinator in the state of Georgia for proof.

George Askew

November 11th, 2009
9:28 am

Can you imagine these blogs if UGA beats Tech. Stranger things have happened.

Dooley's Cardiologist

November 11th, 2009
9:28 am

I am a little confused here…While I think GT would be in the top 4 easily, I am baffled by those who say Tech would finish last. There are only three teams worth mentioning here: Florida, LSU, and Bama. Other than that, the SEC is FILLED WITH MEDIOCRITY. Tech will probably go 3-0 vs. the SEC this year. Albeit three of the SEC’s worst. I don’t understand how you can make the assumption that Tech wouldn’t make it in the SEC. This is just something that is said to try and take away from the fact that UGA CAN”T MAKE IT IN THE SEC!!!

sec football is cupcake anyway

November 11th, 2009
9:28 am

Duke , Wake, virginia , north carolina, boston colleg they are known for quality football!!!!! and TECH owns Georgia, year in and year out SINCE THE RIVALRY BEGAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tom

November 11th, 2009
9:29 am

Methinks Homer’s a bit nervous.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
9:29 am

TC, actually we did show pretty well for that game, considering it was in a monsoon and against Wake, who brought a very small contingent. My issue is not with saying we don’t show as well as the football factories of the Suspiciously Eligible Conference, it is the statement that we have a reputation for being ‘the worst’. That’s nonsense. Did you see the last FSU game on tv? Half the stadium was empty, but no one accuses Seminole fans of poor support for their team. Last time I went to Tally I scalped a ticket on the 50. The attendance for the VT/BC ACCCG was poor last year. Do you acccuse VT fans of having ‘the worst’ reputation for support? It’s a Dawg generated myth. The ‘Tech has no fans’ schtick is all a part of the Dawgs obsession with pretending we’re Vanderbilt to their Tennessee, when we’re really more like Michigan St. to their Michigan.

see you in 17 DAYS...bullpups

November 11th, 2009
9:30 am

your redneck team doesn’t stand the remotest chance against the mighty Yellow Jackets!!!!!

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
9:30 am

Teddy @ 6:53am writes: “Tech can’t throw the ball a lick. That won’t work in the SEC. They will put nine in the box and shut down the run.”

Wrong on both counts Teddy. Tech’s quarterback has a higher passer rating (144.8) than all but three of the starting quarterbacks in the mighty SEC. As for the “put nine in the box to stop the run” comment – that hasn’t worked very well so far this year. Tech is averaging 315 rushing yards per game which ranks second in the nation behind Nevada.

GO JACKETS! THWG!

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:31 am

I agree for the most part. Alabama and UF are great teams but I think it would be interesting to see how tech played them. Now for LSU….we moved the ball against them and had over 400 yards…it was turn overs that absoulutley killed us….special teams fumbled multiple times. Now that we have a kick returner who can fair catch…I think we could beat LSU…..in a shootout. Call me crazy…but LSU was 4 inches away from losing to MSU…

Hmmmmmmm

November 11th, 2009
9:32 am

Homer is VERY nervous!

Sec is cupcakes conference!

November 11th, 2009
9:32 am

join the acc dawgs, with proven winners like duke, wake , virginia and b.c., throw clemson and tech up there too!!!!!! the sec is weak!!!!!

Dannyboy

November 11th, 2009
9:32 am

Sure wish we could settle all this with a playoff…I’m just sayin’…

Lou Vales

November 11th, 2009
9:33 am

A Florida alum, I’ve adopted Tech as my 2nd favorite team. I really believe Tech would be undefeated now if Miami had not been 3rd game in 11 days. I agree with you about the SCC results,however, I believe that tech would win about 30% of the matchups against Florida,Alabama and LSU. Johnson must get some talent in here on the defensive side. The very fact they are only a 10 point favorite against Duke demonstrates the woeful lack of talent on the defensive side. And we must recognize that Tech’s offense insulates the defense or it would be far worse if Tech had to punt a lot.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
9:33 am

TC, the ACCCG never has good attendance. It didn’t last year when VT/BC played, and nobody accuses VT of having poor support. Did you see the last FSU home game on TV? The stadium was half full. Last time I went to Tally I scalped a ticket on the 50 yard line for 30 bucks. Nobody accuses Seminole fans of having ‘the worst support’. Dawg fans like to pretend in their mind that their state rival is a joke the way Vandy is to Tennessee, but it’s closer to Michigan/Michigan St. You have the upper hand, and you have more fans, but we are a traditionally strong program.

Old Gold Britches

November 11th, 2009
9:33 am

Homer is crying he is so pissed………… plus he got fired last night from his pizza delivery job.

Wiley Dork

November 11th, 2009
9:34 am

if you play the same turnover game against Georgia you’ll get beat by 35 too just like LSWHOO did too

okiemon

November 11th, 2009
9:35 am

I think you’re exactly right, Mark. As a life-long Tech fan – and that’s longer than I care to disclose – it pains me to admit it, but it’s true. The top-echelon SEC teams do have superior talent overall, and of course there’s a good reason for that: they’ve been winning for years, and success breeds success, especially in the recruiting world. PJ is just getting started, and given time, he can raise the talent level at Tech, but he – we – are not there yet. It’s still fun to beat up on the SEC, though, when we have the chance :)

cherokee

November 11th, 2009
9:35 am

Cherokee..we own Georgia
November 11th, 2009
9:20 am
Tech has dominated Georgia since the rivalry Began…roflmao Do your research GA leads all time 59-37-5

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:35 am

SEC is Cupcakes…duke is better than half your conference this year. Also where did Matt Schaub, Matt Ryan, Phillip Rivers, Devin Hester, Calvin Johnson, and numerous other top draft pics play college football? Ya we dont have any quality football players in the ACC…your right.

Bo Williams

November 11th, 2009
9:37 am

Mark, which SEC defenses are clearly better than UNC’s defense? And, aren’t all of UNC’s defensive players coming back next year?

What in the world

November 11th, 2009
9:37 am

When it comes to the over all college experience – the ACC is far superior to the SEC – where there is much less emphasizes placed on academics and academic integrity of the schools – particularly when involving athletes. Let’s put it this way – if I were a very talented high school athlete from the inner city or from the sticks, and all I wanted to do is make it to the pro level (college is only a stepping stone to the pros mentality) – then I would choose the school that allowed me the least resistance to getting there. I would choose a school that doesn’t have the academic rigors and demands that a GT, UVA, UNC, Duke, etc has (which, academically speaking, whips the likes of FL, UGA, AL, and TN, with the lone exception being Vandy).
In other words, I would choose UGA over Tech, because I don’t want to have to take a years’ worth of calculus, and where at UGA, I can major in such majors as General Studies (yes, that is a major at UGA), Sports Mgmt, Rec Mgmt, Education; though there is nothing wrong with Education majors, my wife got hers at UGA, but that is a major that is not offered at Tech. So, while the SEC may be superior in athletics (particularly football), it has also been proven to be about the weakest in over all academic standards and athletic graduation rate. I would dare say that 90% of the college football players who play in the SEC could not even come close to getting in their respective schools if it weren’t for the fact that they are “football players”. Heck, most of them wouldn’t even be in their own local community college. In fact, my wife, who I previously mentioned obtained a degree in Education at UGA in the late 1990s told me that several of the football players were in her classes and it was so pathetic how unprepared and uneducated the “players” were. And how they could really care less about being in the classroom and how they all seemed to get by without doing much at all – and still (somehow?) made great grades.

SEC powerhouse NOT

November 11th, 2009
9:38 am

Mark Richt was 8 and 4 in his first season at Georgia, CPJ was 9-4 which is remarkable. But according to you finger pointers, CPJ should have gone 13-0. You mentioned on a given day, GT could beat Fl or Bama, I agree. If they were on the schedule, this team led by Nesbitt would find a way despite the less than desirable defense. When this offense comes back in 2010 as seniors do not think you have to worry about who they can beat…they can beat any of them.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:38 am

Exactly genius…that was my argument…thanks for picking the obvious out. We could beat LSU just like we beat UGA last year…

Future engineer

November 11th, 2009
9:40 am

Great discussion topic, Mark!!! I think if my Jackets were in the SEC, we’d finish 3rd in the East, and 5th in the West. We can’t handle the SEC, which is why we bolted for the ACC before their invite was ever put in the mailbox. The ACC provides a cake walk for us, well, it should anyway. THWG!!!!

Hayseed Dixie

November 11th, 2009
9:40 am

Dear I AM a Homer

Your rant is amazing. I love that you’re yet another UGA fan, somewhere behind a computer, losing his mind.

We Tech fans love you UGA guys going over the edge in droves. You couldn’t have *planned* this season any better.

Have another drink, and fantasize about CPJ coming to coach the mutts. Cheers!

Buzzed

November 11th, 2009
9:41 am

MB – There may be some merit to what you say. But, where would you have ranked Tech in the SEC two years ago? As has recently been noted in the AJC, Tech’s program is moving in the right direction.

wiley has a little peepee

November 11th, 2009
9:41 am

Wiley,
Hmmm…you’re basing beating LSU because you beat UGA LAST YEAR, yet, I seem to remember the last game of Tech’s season LAST YEAR being against LSU. How did that one turn out again?

rico43

November 11th, 2009
9:42 am

It would be a nice holiday gift if Tech could play the Bama-Florida loser in a bowl. Guess the tie-ins make that unlikely.

It will be OK

November 11th, 2009
9:44 am

To I AM a Homer – “could you please tell me what GT has done??” – yea – GT kicked your little puppies butts last year. BTW – what the heck has UGA done? Particually with their so-called Top 10 recruiting class?? CPJ has done much more with the talent that they have than CMR will ever do.

Darius

November 11th, 2009
9:47 am

Bradley – I think you are about right that Tech would be the 4th or 5th best team in the SEC this year … at best. There is a reason that the ACC is called the Almost Competitive Conference.

If if's and but's were candy and nuts

November 11th, 2009
9:47 am

Tech should go back to D-1 Independents. Then we wouldn’t have to share our bowl money with all the teams in the ACC.

SEC powerhouse NOT

November 11th, 2009
9:47 am

CPJ quote from Tuesday’s press conference on a playoff system:

Inevitably what happens is you’ve got a lot of schools that can buy four games at home, so they play eight home games. They have to win probably two games that are really a struggle and if they win those games, they’re going to play for the championship. So why would they want to change?”

That is BAMA and FL, they walk around and then say look at me, we are kings of the universe.

dwight

November 11th, 2009
9:49 am

This is really a poor topic and reach Mark.

I realize you are trying to seel stories but base it on facts rather than guess work. The facts are tech is in acc not the sec. Tech left the sec for better or worse.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:49 am

5th in the west? Have you seen Ole Miss, MSU, Arkansas, Auburn, or LSU play?? The west is the weakest it has been in quite some time. The east is down too… I mean look at Vandy, Kentucky, South Carolina, and UT (who lost to UCLA despite the recent success). FYI future engineer we left the SEC because Dodd wanted the success that Notre Dame had as an idependent. He also was advocating for changes in scholarship limits that would even the playing field for teams that basically cheated, yes you alabama, and had like 20 more scholarships than some of the other schools in the conference. After the conference refused to change, and with the fued between Bear Bryant and Dodd…it seemed in the best interest for GT to leave the SEC. The level of competition in the SEC was about the same as other leauges back in those days….Nebraska, Notre Dame, OU, and Texas were winning a great number of AP national titles back in those days…the SEC had Alabama…not much else.

Um Wiley.....

November 11th, 2009
9:51 am

You did play LSU last year and what happened? Great point NERD.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
9:53 am

Here’s an idea, Mark. Now that you’ve done an article on where Tech would finish in the Suspiciously Eligible Conference, do one on where UGAg would finish in the ACC Coastal. I’d say 4th behind us, Miami and VPI&SU, but with UNC’s defense and the way they’ve been playing better lately, they might give the Dawgs trouble too. Maybe 5th.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:53 am

If you refer to my first post…I talk about that game. We turned the ball over multiple times…but had over 400 yards…the defense didnt shut us down as much as we shut ourselves down. We beat ourselves and LSU beat us…but this year I think we would win. We havent turned the ball over one time on special teams the entire year…last year in the LSU game alone it happend like three times. Different teams…different years…..any given saturday.

EDGE

November 11th, 2009
9:53 am

Hey, dull edge, your team can’t beat florida, bama, or lsu either!

Noseknows

November 11th, 2009
9:54 am

Not any better than third in either division.

Jim R.

November 11th, 2009
9:55 am

SEC Fact Check .com the spin is yours…that the ACC is more than a mediocre conference. You have an entire division that has 3 or more losses. That is fact. And one of them just might beat the only team in the league with 1 loss. The ACC is horrible and you can’t change that fact. The entire ACC hasn’r won a BCS bowl since when? That is the litmus test.

GThor

November 11th, 2009
9:55 am

Hey, Mark, here’s an idea for another article. Since you’ve discussed where Tech would finish in the Suspiciously Eligible Conference, now let’s consider where UGA would finish in the ACC Coastal. I say 4th behind us, Miami and VPI&SU, although with UNC’s defense and improved play lately, they might go 5th.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:55 am

Keep holding on to that bowl game from last year….its a different year. Hell, UGA was ranked number one last year…things change.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
9:56 am

Future Engineer – Tech bolted from the SEC to go to the ACC? Do your research before you run your mouth. Idiot.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
9:56 am

Jim R…since last years orange bowl.

Jim R.

November 11th, 2009
9:58 am

GThor the difference is you guys don’t show when you win. When FSU is winning Tallahassee rocks.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
9:58 am

Noseknows – Other than Florida, who in the SEC East would finish ahead of us?

Jim R.

November 11th, 2009
10:00 am

So Wiley that makes how many BCS bowl wins for the ACC since the inception of the BCS? Two? I rest my case. The ACC is a weak sister. THat’s just fact.

cherokee

November 11th, 2009
10:00 am

TO It will be OK………GT kicked your little puppies butts last year. I personally don’t think a 3 point victory equals a butt kicking

cccwww

November 11th, 2009
10:00 am

GT could give LSU a run for its money, GT did a great job last year in the Peach Bowl against LSU
what a joke!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jim R.

November 11th, 2009
10:02 am

Tech82, that one’s easy. UF, UT, UGA if they beat you because it would then be an SEC game, and maybe even SC. They have the defense to stop you and enough offense to score lots of points on your sorry D.

Brad

November 11th, 2009
10:05 am

You could make the argument that if Tech was in the SEC then you are recruiting the same pool / quality players..so Tech’s speed would be equal or on same level. The key for Tech is to maintain what they are doing now to re-build their ‘brand’ and maintain it.

No doubt LSU killed us in the Peach Bowl. But if Tech can maintain this quality of play for a period of time you will recruit even higher caliber players and compete against the elite SEC teams. I would feel comfortable with Tech playing any of those elite teams in the SEC right now and having a solid chance to win.

Jim R.

November 11th, 2009
10:06 am

Wiley you’re a moron. Les Miles D rocked your world, caused all those turnovers, and then literally torched your sorry azz defense, which still is part of the game. Of course we all know that GT has never lost a game in their entire history. LMAO! Either the refs stole it or you beat yourselves. ROFL. LSU kicked your sorry butts. A 5 loss LSU team at that. You’re about stupid.

Almost Competitive Conference

November 11th, 2009
10:06 am

SEC POWERHOUSE NOT,

You are aware that CPJ described your bees to a T, right? In this decade alone Tech has shamefully played J-Ville State, Furman, The Citadel, UConn (before anyone knew they even had a football team), Samford, Troy and f’n GARDNER-WEBB.

So please, give me break.

Stan Rome

November 11th, 2009
10:08 am

GT’s defense wouldn’t stand up to an SEC schedule. Tech’s D would make them no better than 3rd or 4th in either division. And CPJ has never played defense. That won’t cut it in the SEC. Just ask UGA.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:08 am

lol Jim R….the same UT that lost to UCLA!!!!!!AT HOME!!!!!!!!! The same UGA team that had to get a last second kick to beat a terrible (4-5 in the pac 10) Arizona State team….AT HOME!!! Oh and lmao South Carolina?? The same team that scored 7 points against the worst defense in the ACC(NC State)….duke scored over 50 points on NC State. Come on quit denying it…Tech scored 56 points on vandy and 41 on MSU…both teams that held other SEC offenses in check….even UF. Im willing to bet Alabama doesnt score more than 20 on MSU this weekend.

hahahahaha!!!

November 11th, 2009
10:08 am

Only in nerd-dom lala land is a 3 point win a “butt kicking.” If that’s considered a butt kicking, then what is a 51-7 beating????

Ted

November 11th, 2009
10:09 am

Each conference recruits for it’s conference. In the ACC everyone has tried to keep up with Va Tech. In the SEC everyone has tried to keep up with Florida. Ga Tech plays the bottom and top of the SEC each year. Ga Tech has finally proven itself in beating Ga. Ga Tech has the speed but lacks the size. It will always be that way. The one thing we do have is CPJ and that will be the difference maker.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
10:10 am

Jim R. – I’ll concede Florida because I think their defense is good enough to cause us problems. UT, SC and UGA? Tell me you’re kidding. You really shouldn’t start drinking this early in the morning.

Arnold Decker

November 11th, 2009
10:10 am

If Tech wants to get to the next level they need a defense.

naysay

November 11th, 2009
10:11 am

Mark,

Tech tucked tail and ran the hell out of the SEC over half a century ago for one reason. They knew they couldn’t handle the big boys of college football. That fact still remains true.

jesse james

November 11th, 2009
10:11 am

How would Tech do in the SEC? It is questions like this that show we need a playoff. I sometimes wonder why we need a National Champion. Let the players enjoy the bowl games and have great matchups from teams from different conferences. Until there is a playoff we truly don’t have a national champion. Nobody knows how a team would do in another conference.

SatchelBuzz

November 11th, 2009
10:12 am

Anybody, anywhere, anytime,….and for the record,…the “SEC speed” mantra is just plain old and largely incorrect..give it a rest.

THWG!!!

Suspiciously Eligible Conference

November 11th, 2009
10:12 am

Next question is where would UGA finish in the ACC Coastal. I’d say 4th behind Tech, Miami and VPI&SU. Maybe 5th behind UNC since their defense is so strong, and they’re starting to play better.

Jim

November 11th, 2009
10:13 am

Ted,

Keeping up with Va. Tech? Pretty sad that teams are trying to keep up with a program that has ZERO National Titles on its resume. And how does one 3 point victory in the past 8 years prove anything? You’re not very bright.

Starring Kam Fong as Chin Ho

November 11th, 2009
10:14 am

If Gt was in the SEC, the SEC power rating would drop to 2nd behind the Big 12. We can’t afford another Vandy in the conference. 1 win in 8 yrs does not a powerhouse make.

Suspiciously Eligible Conference

November 11th, 2009
10:14 am

Georgia would finish 4th in the ACC Coastal behind Tech, Miami and VPI&SU, maybe 5th behind UNC with their defense, and improved play lately.

GTinJC

November 11th, 2009
10:15 am

Two things you missed, although I like the story.

1. Give Tech a few years recruiting in the SEC and things would change personnel wise.

2. DT’s – the secret to stopping our offense is great DT’s. I don’t mean good tackles, great ones! You have to have speed, size and power. With a pair of DT’s that can dominate, you can blow up the option. Of course, you can blow up any offense with that kind of DL.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:15 am

Jim R…if you read my post…I said LSU beat us…”We beat ourselves and LSU beat us”. I know LSU beat us but if we didnt turn the ball over say 5 times…maybe we stand a far better chance….I mean hell we moved the ball. As for the defense…I agree they are terrible but so are some of the SEC defenses…UGA, Vandy, MSU, Auburn, and Arkansas all have terrible defenses statistically. They are in your conference right?? I mean from they way you guys talk only the good teams are in your conference. This offense is our best defense….it has to control the clock and hold on to the ball. Thats the same way the Nebraska Cornhuskers dominated college football…they had some terrible defenses but when you score 60 points…who cares…just ask the Gators…62-24.

Rico

November 11th, 2009
10:16 am

Mark – nice job! I know you did not think of this subject on your own :) This had to come from a staff meeting. “Way to get the feathers ruffled”. I hvae no idead where Tech would finish if they were in the SEC for one year. But, I can assure you that if they were there more than one year, Paul Johnson would find a way to get to the top, QUICKLY.

Mark Bradley

November 11th, 2009
10:16 am

You know, you’ve given me an idea.

Coming soon: Where would Georgia finish in the ACC?

Thanks so much. I need all the ideas I can find.

gt2004

November 11th, 2009
10:16 am

you must keep in mind that the SEC has one thing the ACC doesn’t; money. between highly lucrative tv deals, multi-million dollar facilities, and anything an 18 year old kid could want, including the most exposure for nfl scouts, there’s no way joe blow is going to pick an ACC school over an SEC school. if you put Georgia Tech in the SEC, and they got a piece of that money (TV deals, bowl tie-ins, etc), that would totally change the dynamic of the school. imagine the kids CPJ could recruit with all that extra money in facilities, perks, etc. now you’re looking at a florida defense (GT already has a better offense than Florida, including Nesbitt having equal, if not better stats than Heisman-bound Tebow). just a small quip, but you can’t compare SEC to ACC without certain qualifiers.

GTMan108

November 11th, 2009
10:16 am

Clemsnman

November 11th, 2009
10:17 am

GT is good, but delusions of perpetual grandeur are a bit premature. This year, Nesbitt and #8 are very good at what they do. In fact, a WR as good as #8 is not likely to be in Atl again for a while, and taking that away really would hurt that offense, if you find a qb that is as tough as Nesbitt.
But the reason Bama, UF, possibly LSU or others could beat Tech is defense. GT’s defense is okay, but not great. #91 is really good, but they are not deep enough to keep up a high level of play for a whole game.
Besides, I am thinking the Orange Bowl this yr will be full of just that, ORANGE.

cherokee

November 11th, 2009
10:17 am

Tech82 …..You have beaten Ga once in 8 years get a life. Beat them again this year and then and maybe then you can start crowing about a winning streak.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
10:17 am

Jim R. @ 10:06am – You really should do your homework before you post. Tech put up 314 of offense to LSU’s 324 in last year’s chicken bowl. Their defense DID NOT shut us down. We shut ourselves down with turnovers and stupid penalties. LSU won the game – period. We got embarrassed but Les Miles’ defense only shut us down to the degree that our defense shut LSU down. There was a whopping ten yards of difference.

Almost Competitive Conference

November 11th, 2009
10:18 am

Nice try Suspiciouly Eligible Conference. The God awful ACC has 5 teams that aren’t even playing .500 ball. What a joke

Arnold Decker

November 11th, 2009
10:19 am

Wiley you’re the very type of guy that will drop off the face of the earth IF UGA beats Tech. And it IS possible. Truthfully, whether you believe it or not, GT ain’t there yet. They’re a flavor of the day. Do it consistently and that will change. But some of the guys above are right. Tech doesn’t have the defense to compete in the SEC week in and week out.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
10:19 am

Mark. Pretty good call. There are clearly 4 teams – see below – are superior this year to tech. As great as all the locals think tech is, they’d be a middle of the pack team this year in the SEC. I actually think Clemson is the team that would push both Rocky Top and the Bayou Bengal this year.

1. Bama
2. Gators
3. LSU
4. Rocky Top
5 – 8 UGA, Cocky, Ole Miss, War Eagle (in no particular order)
9 – 12 Ark, Ky, Vandy, Miss St (in no particular order)

Almost Competitive Conference

November 11th, 2009
10:19 am

Nice try Suspiciously Eliglible Conference,

The God awful ACC has 5 teams that aren’t even playing .500 ball. What a joke.

SEC powerhouse NOT

November 11th, 2009
10:19 am

Bama,. you have so much to be proud of..throwing a brick thru a coaches window, can it get anymore redneck than that? LSU, all you can talk about is beating GT in CPJ’s first season with 16 freshman and soph. starters.. what about your coach, Les Miles? Thought he was suppose to walk on water, what happened? Who the he!! have you beaten? Your fans and alum, such as James Carville are the biggest backwoods rednecks I ever heard pronounce words. scoooootur libbie, you would think he would have taken speech lessons if he were going to be in the political limelight..

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
10:20 am

Cherokee – Please point out where I was crowing about a winning streak? Oh never mind, you’re just another of the UGA backers that posts without any basis in fact. I get it. I guess if my team was struggling to have a winning season, I would be inclined to create my own reality too.

Jaded Jacket

November 11th, 2009
10:20 am

If the SEC were so tough why have they been playing cupcakes for the past two weekends? They did the same at the beginning of the year. SEC teams are nothing but “kitty cats.”

Mark Bradley

November 11th, 2009
10:20 am

Sorry, Rico, to disillusion you. But we don’t have many staff meetings, and this post certainly wasn’t a product of one. It was, for better or worse, all mine.

Not everything is a conspiracy, FYI. Just the SEC officiating.

Arnold Decker

November 11th, 2009
10:20 am

Tech82 it’s your defense that would kill you in the SEC. Arkansas could probably hang 50 on it. That’s what you GT fans just aren’t intelligent enough to comprehend. In the SEC it’s about DEFENSE. And you don’t have one.

Almost Competitive Conference

November 11th, 2009
10:23 am

Suspiciously Eligible Conference and Jaded Jacket,

You tools are aware the ACC has F-I-V-E teams that aren’t even playing .500 ball, right? What a joke!!!

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:23 am

Im not saying its not possible. Ill be here if UGA beats Tech because I support my school and my team no matter what. If we lose to UGA this year it will be an Upset…something UGA fans arent used too. Im not saying Tech is the best team in the nation because we arent. We dont have a good defense but that doesnt matter as long as we keep winning. Im a Tech alumni and lifelong fan…not one of the new fair weather fans. I respect UGA’s talent but this year there are no excuses to losing to them because we are the better team.

SEC powerhouse NOT

November 11th, 2009
10:23 am

hey, Almost Competitive Conference

Bama and UFL play these teams in one season, hahahahahahahahahah you cannot make it up and by the way, Charleston Southern (Baptist College) is only a Div 1AA school because they were forced to be because of the basketball program. They have a enrollment of about 2000.

GTinJC

November 11th, 2009
10:24 am

naysay, nosay, idiotspeak,

Tech was the big boy in the SEC when we left. We left because the pu$$y commissioner wouldn’t do squat about bear bryant’s abuse of student athletes. Sign 130 to scholarships and cut loose all that don’t measure up as ball players. Dodd wouldn’t due that and stated that he would leave the SEC if it did not change. Man of his word.

Coach of the year trophy – Bobby Dodd – GT
Football player of the year trophy – John Heisman – GT
Athletic Administrator of the year award – Homer Rice – GT

4 National Championships

5 SEC Championships

Yeah we got no tradition, no football pedigree. I guess we can’t hang with the big bad (sic) sEC.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:25 am

holy crap my grammar is bad…you can tell I went to Tech. The first to should be a for*

It could happen...

November 11th, 2009
10:27 am

Bamas the only team in the nation that can beat tech right now the way dwyer is running and that is because our center weighing at 255 would go against mount cody at 360 and not allow dwyer to run and if he is stuffed then mcclain could cover nesbitt with the secondary worrying about the pitch, cody is the only reason we would lose. thats why i want to play florida in the orange bowl beat them and become the first team in the modern era to defeat 4 SEC teams. WOW imagine if that really happen cause it could

GTinJC

November 11th, 2009
10:28 am

The tool is that you can’t comprehend that there are 4 ACC teams in the top 25 and 3 SEC teams. Wow, that must come as a real shock cause I know you tools can’t read most of the names.

AndyC

November 11th, 2009
10:28 am

Mark

Right on the money with this one. Tech fans need a reality check. They do not deserve to be playing for the championship. They are not nearly good enough to compete with the elite teams in the country. It’s probably better that they don’t get a shot at Flordia, Alabama, or Texas because it would be another embarrassing loss like the one to LSU last season. Bowl projections show that Tech might play a mediocre Iowa team. They can probably handle Iowa.

Arnold Decker

November 11th, 2009
10:29 am

Tech82, wrong again. GT bolted the SEC over scholarship limits only to get burned when the NCAA imposed limits across the board. The SEC wouldn’t take them back. Google and you will find this FACT. Idiot.

In 1971, the ACC lost a member in South Carolina, which two decades later in 1991 became a member of the Southeastern Conference. The ACC operated with seven members until the addition of a former Southeastern Conference member, the Georgia Institute of Technology (”Georgia Tech”) from the Metro Conference on April 3, 1978.

Buzz Belle

November 11th, 2009
10:29 am

Drill down to “Dodd wins …” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Tech_Yellow_Jackets_football

Who cares is the SEC is “better” than the ACC? Flip to basketball and what happens? All the more reason we need a playoff system.

smart

November 11th, 2009
10:30 am

I would have to say that I am a die hard uga fan. I even work in teh university system of georgia. However I have to tell it like it is. What’s wrong with Uga is that we keep giving them a pass. We keep calling them a powehouse. True powerhouses do not have drop offs like Uga. look at Fla, Ala, Lsu they keep rolling. So I would have to say Uga is a pretender want a be.

Georgia Tech has defifed the odds. No one though they would be where they are at today. The reason is the difference in coaching styles. True talent will make it to the NFL if thats what you or destined for. However what Uga is doing is annotting kids as NFL players and they come in acting like it, except they leave the football skills wherever they came from and the skills are not brought to Athens. Paul johnson on the other hand demands respect and reminds you that it is a priviledge to play Division 1 football and not a right.

For anyone to say that GT would not succeed in the SEC is living a pipe dream. I think with the way they run the ball , because the backs at GT are as good as any SEC back.

Solution CMR needs his fire back, also start back calling plays. Get rid of WM are demote.Lure Tommy Tuberville to be Defensive co. pay him whatever you need to then maybe we will start rolling at UGA.

But until GT shows other wise they are here to stay. So give them credit until they show us they don’t deserve it. The AJC keeps overshadowing GT, but maybe if you told the truth about the programs both would succeed. I am from the state of Georgia so I love any success that any of our schools should have over other states. Thats from Junior colleges to Division 1. So GT keep defying the odds and stay out of the media and you will continue to succeed.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
10:31 am

Arnold Decker – I agree that our defense (or lack thereof) is our weak link this year. I don’t think you would find too many reasonable Tech fans that would argue that. Last time I checked, the “W” was awarded to the team with the most points and as long as you can’t stop our offense, we’ll outscore you. Just look at the FSU game. You’re right, Arkansas probably would hang 50 on us this year, but as long as we put up 51, it’s ok.

Froggy the Gremlin

November 11th, 2009
10:31 am

Heh Heh……Good one Bradley……Heh Heh……

Brian

November 11th, 2009
10:32 am

Hate to tell ya, but LSU hasn’t beaten or impressed anyone. Tech could certainly take Alabama. They just match up well with them. I’m going to have to go with 2nd.

SEC isn’t everything it’s made out to be folks.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
10:34 am

Arnold Decker – If you take the time to actually read my post (that, of course, assumes you are literate), you will see that I never denied we were once members of the SEC. My point was that we DID NOT leave the SEC to join the ACC. You stand corrected.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:34 am

Dodd’s tenure included Georgia Tech’s withdrawal from the Southeastern Conference.[14] The initial spark for Dodd’s withdrawal was a historic feud with Alabama Crimson Tide Coach Bear Bryant.[16] The feud began when Tech was visiting the Tide at Denny Stadium in 1961. After a Tech punt, Alabama fair-caught the ball. Chick Granning of Tech was playing coverage and relaxed after the signal for the fair catch. Darwin Holt of Alabama continued play and smashed his elbow into Granning’s face causing severe fracturing in his face, a broken nose, and blood-filled sinuses. Granning was knocked unconscious and suffered a severe concussion, the result of which left him unable to play football ever again. Dodd sent Bryant a letter asking Bryant to suspend Holt after game film indicated Holt had intentionally injured Granning.[16] Bryant never suspended Holt. The lack of discipline infuriated Dodd and sparked Dodd’s interest in withdrawing from the SEC.

Another issue of concern for Dodd was Alabama’s and other SEC schools’ over-recruitment of players.[16] Universities would recruit more players than they had roster space for. During the summer practice sessions, the teams in question would cut the players well after signing day thus preventing the cut players from finding new colleges to play for. Dodd appealed the SEC administration to punish the “tryout camps” of his fellow SEC members but the SEC did not. Finally, Dodd withdrew Georgia Tech from the SEC in 1963.[16] Tech would remain an independent like Notre Dame and Penn State (at the time) during the final four years of Dodd’s coaching tenure.

Hillbilly Deluxe

November 11th, 2009
10:35 am

Where would Tech rank in the SEC?

Ahead of Georgia.

smart

November 11th, 2009
10:35 am

Andy C,

Would Uga beat Iowa? Remember You play the schedule you are handed. GT beats who they are supposse to beat Uga doesnt.

SECfan

November 11th, 2009
10:36 am

Tech is good right now. But can they really bash Georgia? How many wins does UGA have over Tech? And how many years did UGA beat tech before they got a win? And before that it took seven years for Tech to put together a three year win streak. The point I am trying to prove is that UGA maybe down but they are still the elite program in the state. Tech fans bashing UGA is like UGA bashing Florida. It’s pointless because it is obvious they have your number. So go jack off to Nesbitt-Dwyer highlight film and soak in the glory days of your program because they will be back in the closet very soon. Trust me.

GameTime

November 11th, 2009
10:38 am

For the most part, a fair analysis. I wouldn’t necessarily put the Jackets behind LSU though. Defense may not be as strong but offense and coaching much better. I think that gives Tech the edge.
And I don’t believe the ACC is as weak as some want to suggest. Not much difference in my opinion with Big 11, Big 12, Big East, and Pac 10. What do the Sagarin rankings say?

CrazyVol

November 11th, 2009
10:40 am

Okay, I don’t really have a dog in this fight, since it appears that this has once again become a tech versus dawg discussion. First and foremost, tech is having a great year. Yea for you. But when you start off by stating that the SEC is not all that, you just show your ignorance and pretty much disagree with every known sports writer and authority in the field. The SEC is the premier conference and has been for a long time, and more then likely will be in the future.

As far as how Tech would do? Interesting. Could they take the weekly pounding form Florida, Alabama, Tennessee, Uga, LSU and still be a contender? That’s the big if? And one of the major issues the SEC has, our teams spend the season beating the heck out of each other, and by the end of the year most are worn out.

Froggy the Gremlin

November 11th, 2009
10:41 am

Tech would completely dominate the SEC, even with their more stringent academic requirements.

Mike

November 11th, 2009
10:43 am

This is not just a question of “who are they better than”. The fact is, the SEC has a lot more teams you have to show up against. Tech won shootouts over Miss St. and Vandy (combined 2 wins in the SEC). South Carolina, Arkansas, Auburn, Georgia, and Ole Miss all bring the firepower to overwhelm Tech’s defense. Georgia and Auburn being the only two with suspect defenses in return. Tennessee would likely shut the triple option down as completely as LSU, Alabama, or Florida. The recent display of offense at UT suggests they could score as well. Depending on how the schedule falls, Tech could wind up with a series of 4-5 brutal games in which a 2nd or 3rd place finish is wishful thinking.

The biggest difference is the SEC defensive lines. They are bigger and more athletic than any in the country (overall). The triple option would have a much tougher time in the SEC because half the teams sport D lines that can overwhelm Tech’s offensive line. Add to that, Tech’s defense stinks. You CANNOT win in the SEC without defense…ask UGA and Willie Martinez.

As a comparison, this year’s Tech team reminds me of last year’s UGA team. The difference is Auburn and Tennessee are much better this year (two teams UGA barely beat last year). That UGA team suffered 3 losses and won a couple of shootouts. Were UT and Auburn better, it could have been worse. Why? No defense.

If Tech has UGA’s current schedule, I predict at least 4 if not 5 losses. They would lose the opener @Oklahoma St., LSU, @UT, Florida, and I’m not sure they would beat both South Carolina and @Arkansas in back to back games after Oklahoma St.

Nativebird

November 11th, 2009
10:43 am

Without a Quarterback than can actually pass a football? Not too high. Get a double threat Quarterback? this Offense could possibly have them on TOP!
it is all about the lack of talent at GT’s qb position. and it is enormous.

VandyVendidad

November 11th, 2009
10:44 am

When you consider that Vanderbilt’s offense put up 24 on Tech (far more than they’ve scored on any SEC opponent), it’s certainly fair to say their defense is far from SEC-calibur.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:45 am

SEC fan every program has down years. Tech has won at least 7 games for like 15 straight years….thats consistently being average. Now that Johnson is here I dont think we will ever lose more than four games with him as our head coach. The future is so bright right now at Tech and just like with Nebraska, UT, FSU, UF, and Miami during thier perspective glory years…tech seems to be on the cusp of something very big. Keep saying we cant recruit..keep saying we cant win. It just adds fuel too PJ’s fire and you folks are providing the ammunition for your own demise. GO JACKETS!!

Delbert D.

November 11th, 2009
10:46 am

First in the Big 10
First in the PAC 10
Second in the Big 12
Hopefully, First in the ACC

Saint Simons

November 11th, 2009
10:48 am

Sec plays 31 cupcake teams!!!!!!!

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
10:48 am

Nativebird – Other than Tebow (Fla) and Mallett (Ark), which SEC quarterbacks do you consider better passers than Josh Nesbitt?

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:48 am

Vandy…I have said over and over our defense sucks…I said the offense is our best defense by clock control…can you people read an entire post and not just a few sentences….geez why can no one in this country read anything longer than a few sentences…no wonder we have fallen so far behind the rest of the world. If your offense doesnt get the ball…they cant score.

Eagle-Jacket

November 11th, 2009
10:49 am

I would say GT would rank 3rd in the SEC. Not bad considering the 1 & 2 in the SEC are 1 &2 nationally. But Tony, I’m surprised! Your column is just a “Poke in the eye”,to the sainted Bulldogs!

Andrew

November 11th, 2009
10:49 am

If Georgia Tech played in the SEC, they would finish 4th in the SEC West and 4th in the SEC East. Looking at the East, Tech would have to play Monte Kiffin’s Defense at UT, Florida,Georgia and Kentucky. You might laugh at this fact but lets look at the reality, GT struggled against a very small Wake Forest defense. Now add more size and faster speed and GT would get manhandled by Alabama, LSU (they already manhandled GT last year), Auburn, Florida, and Tennessee. But thats just my perspective.

Sugar Hill Dawg

November 11th, 2009
10:50 am

Ed77 – Tech w/d from the SEC due to greed. Bobby Dodd created a monster in the 50s and 60s – they had to share whatever $$ from their bowl with everyone else. Smart move, as it turned out. Coach Dodd retires, Tech falls into oblivion, joins a joke conference after the SEC tells ‘em to buzz off when they tried to get back in, then wallows in obscurity for decades. (Yeah – I’m aware they won a split NC in 1990 – great team that year.) Coaches Ross, O’Leary and Johnson had moments – I’m looking forward to seeing what CPJ can accomplish at The Flats. Unlike most UGA alums, I root for Tech until the Last Saturday In November. I’m enough of a realist to recognize UGA can’t win ‘em all forever, but I’ll take Mark Richt’s record against the Jackets any time! Maybe after this year the Tech folks will get off their wallets and buy some tickets. My son’s in the AUMB, so I’m really looking forward to Saturday night in Athens. Once that bit of family business is done, I’ll look forward to UGA’s biannual win in Midtown! Go Dawgs!

mansup01

November 11th, 2009
10:50 am

I’m a jacket fan…….but have you guys seen the Jacket defense? I agree with Mark in that fourth is about correct. Tech could outscore the remaining members of the conference, but I’m afraid the top three would just score too often. Go Jackets.

banners

November 11th, 2009
10:52 am

Tech can’t handle the SEC, which is why they bolted from the conference years ago!!

sam

November 11th, 2009
10:52 am

Tech is good and florida is good, or better than good, at least fl. is…I saw them in Jax….The glue for these two teams are their Quarterback……Take them out or graduate and they are different teams….still good but not nearly as good as they are now…I saw Tebo on 3rd down 4 or 5 times just take over and make it and we knew he was coming and couldn’t stop him….And neither could tech stop him, he would get 200 yards against tech….All said we’ll know next year about fla.without Tebo….I’m telling you all, he is the best in college football with that team…..Nesbit, as good as he is with techs running game, he could never start for fla….That’s why UGA wanted him as a DBack and he’d be heading for Sunday play after next year instead of the real estate business 2 years from now……Book it…

wiley

November 11th, 2009
10:54 am

Andrew but we also played Clemson,UNC, FSU, and Miami(even though though we lost). All those teams have incredible amounts of talent and field players with similar size and speed. Clemson has two five star Defensive ends, UNC has multiple 5 star and four star defensive players,and we all know FSU and Miami are loaded…I mean loaded with defensive talent. UNC’s defense is almost a mirror image of UT’s defense. As for Auburn and UGA’s defense…they matchup very well with FSU’s lmao!

Evans

November 11th, 2009
10:54 am

The ACC currently has 5 teams not even playing .500 ball. By season’s end, half the conference will be below .500. What a joke and disgrace to college football the ACC is.

Jaded Jacket

November 11th, 2009
10:56 am

Here’s something to chew on. The ACC and SEC both have 12 teams. However, the SEC, as mighty as they are, will have played 10 more cupcake opponents than the ACC in 2009. That’s almost an average of one more easy game per team in the SEC. Kinda weak in my opinion.

chemdawg

November 11th, 2009
10:57 am

Strength of schedule (sos) matters, but the statistics used to define sos are worthless unless there is significant overlap between the teams opponents you are comparing. Whenever won-loss records are used to determine the strength of opponents who play cupcakes (and the opponents of the opponents play cupcakes themselves) the stats are skewed. For example, what is the strength of schedule of little billy’s peewee football team? Well they rank ahead of Tech, so they would obviously dominate the ACC!

mansup01

November 11th, 2009
10:58 am

By the way, it has been a long time since Wake was Weak Forest. They are disciplined, smart, tough, and well coached……unlike UGA and some other members of the SEC. I only wish UGA played Wake…..that would be a fun afternoon for Tech fans. Talk about humiliating the dawgs!
To suggest that Ky is significant at all is ridiculous. UGA has been struggling with that “powerhouse” for years and once again the UGA fans have justified this and turned it into glory.

The Riddler

November 11th, 2009
10:58 am

Jacketnation, answer me this. How come a large portion of Georgia Tech atheletes take many of their classes at Georgia State. Oh yeah, how did your boy Joe Hamilton do in those Calculus classes? I’d say Josh Nesbitt is doing about as good as he did.

Vols_1

November 11th, 2009
10:58 am

Tech would do well in its first year. In the second year with some experience against that offense, Tech would join Vandy at the bottom of the conference. On defense, Tech doesn’t have the athletes to compete.

Bat Man

November 11th, 2009
10:58 am

If tech was in the interplanetary conference, they would finsih no worse than second, right behind Uranus.

This is nonsense.

Jaded Jacket

November 11th, 2009
10:59 am

Evans, look at who the SEC is playing out of conference. The SEC schedules easy games to pad their win totals.

RealityYech

November 11th, 2009
10:59 am

Even with Yech’s insistence of playing the SEC cellar dwellers in recent years, the bees STILL maintain a losing record against the SEC. Nuff said.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
10:59 am

Mark. I’ll go ahead and jump the gun on where UGA finishes in this year’s ACC. Anywhere from 1st – 4th. Clemson, Miami, Tech and Va. Tech would all be competative with UGA based on where I think the Vegas line would be set (3 – 5 points either way) and the venue of the game. UGA would be favored over all other ACC teams.

THE CATHOLIC HAMMER

November 11th, 2009
11:01 am

Here is a question to all of you “experts”:

Who is the 4th best team in the SEC? Arkansas? Tennessee? Auburn? Georgia? South Carolina?

Is Tech better than all of them? We’ll find out about UGA in a few weeks…

Meanwhile, outside of Alabama’s win over VPI, what is the out-of-conference “signature win”? I would have to say Auburn over West Virginia. That’s not very impressive.

Meanwhile, in the ACC, Wake Forest has beaten Stanford and NC State has beaten Pitt. That’s somewhat more impressive, no?

wiley

November 11th, 2009
11:02 am

Vols_1…hahahahaha. So your telling me a conference with DUKE, BC, UNC, VT, NC State, Maryland, UVA, and Wake Forest doesnt have enough smart people to figure out how to stop this offenes?? If there was a magical way to stop this offense someone would have figured it out 30 years ago when PJ started running it. Just like with any offense or offensive scheme, spread pro set…etc, it can be stoped with proper execution. If your logic held true than UF would have been figured out two years ago…but nope they still are owning your conference with a similar offense. The only difference is they run it out of the shot gun….instead of center.

Sugar Hill Dawg

November 11th, 2009
11:02 am

Tech w/d from the SEC due to greed. Bobby Dodd created a monster in the 50s and 60s – they had to share whatever $$ from their bowl with everyone else. Smart move, as it turned out. Coach Dodd retires, Tech falls into oblivion, joins a joke conference after the SEC tells ‘em to buzz off when they tried to get back in, then wallows in obscurity for decades. (Yeah – I’m aware they won a split NC in 1990 – great team that year.) Coaches Ross, O’Leary and Johnson had moments – I’m looking forward to seeing what CPJ can accomplish at The Flats. Unlike most UGA alums, I root for Tech until the Last Saturday In November. I’m enough of a realist to recognize UGA can’t win ‘em all forever, but I’ll take Mark Richt’s record against the Jackets any time! Maybe after this year the Tech folks will get off their wallets and buy some tickets. My son’s in the AUMB, so I’m really looking forward to Saturday night in Athens. Once that bit of family business is done, I’ll look forward to UGA’s biannual win in Midtown! Go Dawgs!

Sugar Hill Dawg

November 11th, 2009
11:03 am

Tech w/d from the SEC due to greed. Bobby Dodd created a monster in the 50s and 60s – they had to share whatever $$ from their bowl with everyone else. Wow – smart move, as it turned out. Coach Dodd retires, Tech falls into oblivion, joins a joke conference after the SEC tells ‘em to buzz off when they tried to get back in, then wallows in obscurity for decades. (Yeah – I’m aware they won a split NC in 1990 – great team that year.) Coaches Ross, O’Leary and Johnson had moments – I’m looking forward to seeing what CPJ can accomplish at The Flats. Unlike most UGA alums, I root for Tech until the Last Saturday In November. I’m enough of a realist to recognize UGA can’t win ‘em all forever, but I’ll take Mark Richt’s record against the Jackets any time! Maybe after this year the Tech folks will get off their wallets and buy some tickets. My son’s in the AUMB, so I’m really looking forward to Saturday night in Athens. Once that bit of family business is done, I’ll look forward to UGA’s biannual win in Midtown! Go Dawgs!

Jaded Jacket

November 11th, 2009
11:03 am

There appears to be a lot of disgruntled UGA fans here today. I love it! I hope their football team is causing them to smoke, eat and drink more. Nothing like a fat drunk UGA fan who smells like an ash tray. I work with three of ‘em so I know.

techengineer

November 11th, 2009
11:03 am

I agree, but Tech is on the rise. That’s why I feel so sorry for Dawg fans.. lol Must be awful watching their program go down the drain because the Coach puts his personal feelings ahead of the good of the team and its fans…

Evans

November 11th, 2009
11:04 am

J-Ville State, Baylor, Elon, Navy, Murray State, Gardner-Webb, James Madison, Middle Tenn. State, William & Mary and Southern Miss ALL show up on the schedules of the 5 ACC teams currently below .500.

Try again, numbnutz

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
11:06 am

JJ. You sound like the typical insecure tech fan. Try to be OBJECTIVE and stay on point without digressing to all the negativity.

Rob

November 11th, 2009
11:07 am

Tech is an engineering school, yet less than 2% of their football, basketball and baseball players are engineering majors.

That’s like someone trying to brag about going to MIT and only getting a P.E. degree.

hedge puller

November 11th, 2009
11:08 am

As a Tech alumnus I love to say that Tech would win the SEC, but our current guys could lose to any team we play and lose badly. An SEC schedule would be very tough but I think this year’s team would finish someplace in the middle of the pack.
Mark, If Anne Cox lets her publication of Pravda continue for two more years, ask the question then. Johnson will have the hogs on the o line and the war daddies for the d line to go with the skill guys. The SEC will not want any part of GT after 24 months.
THWG, THWND

Rickety Bobo Willie

November 11th, 2009
11:10 am

UGA – the dogs rule what?

DawgHouse

November 11th, 2009
11:10 am

JJ is the perfect representative of the Yech fan base. Very insecure, envious of UGA, jealous of our ownership over his bees, ashamed Yech plays in a joke of a conference and has only one real conference title to show for it. It’s hilarious!!! His misery puts a huge smile on my face :)

bob

November 11th, 2009
11:10 am

I am not sure what LSU has done to out rank Tech on your list. Tech has had better games against their common opponents so far. (Tech could say the same about Alabama and Florida, but that is a different story.)

LSU’s signature win of the season is against Auburn? Not exactly the stuff of greatness. Certainly beating VT is a more notable achievement.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
11:12 am

RealityYech – Paul Johnson is 4-1 against the SEC so far with at least one more “W” to come this year. Nuff said.

Georgia lollipop licker

November 11th, 2009
11:12 am

Georgia would be ranked above tech is all I know, even after they beat us again!

heyberto

November 11th, 2009
11:13 am

I just don’t know why Mark Bradley has turned into Terrence Moore… stirring the pot for the sake of stirring. There is no other valid reason for this column. We all know Tech is better than UGA this year, why compare them to the SEC? Congrats AJC… you’ve got a new head idiot sports columnist. Terrence’s mantle has been taken up.

Dan

November 11th, 2009
11:13 am

Ahh yes, beating the annually overrated Hokies who’s only signature win is their loss to Bama is really a FAR more notable achievement. Oh wait, they did thump the Caines who a$$raped the tools.

Losers with class

November 11th, 2009
11:13 am

HBTD – we’ll just change your name to “pure conjecture and absent of all facts.”

Scott V.

November 11th, 2009
11:14 am

Dear Super B and daggum Mark Bradley for that matter,
Had you read the subtext of my email, which being an SEC fan, could prove challenging. You would have picked up on the fact I was referring to our option offense “blasting” defenses. In the 5 SEC games we’ve played since the start of last year we have put up 38, 45, 3, 42, and 56 points. With the only bad performance the one against LSU

I will not try to argue about our defense, they are spotty at best. And here’s a statistic for you. We scored 8 offensive touchdowns against Vandy. LSU managed 2 touchdowns and Florida 3. In fact, SEC opponents are averaging 2.5 touchdowns per game against Vandy. An offense that potent makes up for weakness on defense. In fact, I question whether SEC defenses are as good as advertised or if the offenses are just plain bad. And all of the discussion about depth? We substitute more on offense than probably any offense in the SEC, that’s how we wear teams down and tend to dominate the second half.
When you finishes looking up some of the big words in the dictionary Super B, I’ll await your reply.
Yours Truly,
Scott McTechsgonnarockuga

Kumar

November 11th, 2009
11:14 am

Yeah Tech82, stacking his schedule with the two divisional bottom feeders is very admirable.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
11:15 am

HBTD…judging by UGA’s performance against the OOC teams it played this year they would probally fair much worse than fourth. They nearly lost to the 7th or 8th best team in the PAC 10…at home. I would say if they played our schedule…right now they would be, at best, sitting at 5-4 with loses to Miami, Clemson, FSU, and VT. The wins though would be very close with scares agaisnt Wake, and MSU. At the end of the year I think they would end up 7-5 or 6-6…with a trip to the west. I would also pick Duke to beat UGA…because Duke’s passing attack is nasty. If crompton could destroy UGA’s defense…Imagine what one of the best passing QB’s in the college game would do agaisnt that secondary…Thad Lewis is an absolute beast….even if he plays for a sorry program.

Paul's Johnson

November 11th, 2009
11:15 am

Tech82:

“Nativebird – Other than Tebow (Fla) and Mallett (Ark), which SEC quarterbacks do you consider better passers than Josh Nesbitt?”

Joe Cox’ career QB rating is 138.4, Nesbitt’s career4 QB rating is 114.8, so I guess technically, Cox would be a better QB.

James T. Kirk

November 11th, 2009
11:16 am

How long will it be before we can erect a statue in CPJ honor? When do you think they’ll rename the Heisman the Johnson? I can’t believe Nesbitt isn’t in the lead for the award this year!!!

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
11:17 am

4th in the sec sounds about right and I think Mark is spot on with his article. Tech could possibly beat Alabama and Florida on any given day but it should also be noted that LSU especially, Ark, Auburn, UT, Ole Miss, South Carolina, UGA, and even Kentucky could all beat Tech on any given day.

I hear some people with idiotic comments such as pointing out that Bama had a close game against UT. Is that the best you got? We still won the game. And now folks are criticizing us not because we lost but because somebody came close to beating us? That’s unbelievable.

The UT game is the only game Bama has played where we didn’t win by 2 scores or more. Same with Florida I believe. I think they only had one game where someone played them within 1 score and every other game they won by 2 scores or more.

If you use that argument then Tech is a really bad team. Why? Because Tech not only has a loss and a bad loss at that by 16 pts but they also have a series of close games that they won by a single score or less. They barely got by with a 3 pt win over Clemson, a 5 pt win over FSU, a 5 pt win over VT, and they had to go to overtime to get a 3 pt win over Wake Forest. That’s a bad 16 pt loss and 4 barely won games by margins of 3,3, 5, 5 pts. I am not impressed with a team that has eked out a series of close wins.

Bama destroyed Clemson last year, beat VT by 10 in a game which was a statistical blowout 500 total yds to 150 for VT and Bama ended the game on the VT 12 yard line. We could have poured it on and beaten VT by 13-17 if we wanted to run up the score.

UF destroyed FSU last time they played them while Tech barely slides by.The cold hard stats say that Tech isn’t close to Bama or Florida and we won’t even get into LSU since we all remember what happened last year.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
11:18 am

Bob. You can’t really be serious. I know last year was last year, but you really think you’ve made up enough ground on LSU to overcome a 38 – 3 loss???

1Jacket7

November 11th, 2009
11:18 am

Mark you really caused a Buzz with this topic. Is this the most responses to a blog that you have received? First, Tech would rank at the Top this year and years to come with this coach and the system. The SEC has been strong because they have played well in the out of conference games against the rest of the country over the last few years. But, who are we talking about. Because this only refers to Florida and LSU. Both won NC titles beating Big Ten OSU and Big 12 OU. Now what no one talked about was the Alabama loss to Utah. Last year WF beat Ole Miss, Tech beat UGA, Miss ST and loss to LSU. Clemson has been beating up on South Carolina for several years. Tech beat Auburn the last two times they played. And you can site SEC teams that have beat ACC teams recently too. But, what people see is only what they want to see. The ACC will and is getting stronger but the only way we will show this is in our SEC games. So FSU, Miami needs to beat UF. Tech over UGA etc. But what does it mean when the Slant is so largely favored in the SEC. Boise has done nothing but win. Over OU and everyone else. They get no love but the mighty SEC is scared to play them. Actually, the out of conference games in the SEC is getting weaker. So you and CPJ are right. A playoff will be the only equalizer and that in its self is why it wont happen. I am glad I got my NC ring when I did because the bias in college football has gone from the polls to the bowls and now to the officiating. Crap.

Mike

November 11th, 2009
11:19 am

Tech would be using 3rd string players by now in the SEC. Acc is for losers.

Doug

November 11th, 2009
11:19 am

Hey Andrew, did you watch the Tech-Wake game? Tech had a bad game and still won. We dropped passes, overthrew wide open receivers, and had a ridiculous number of penalties. We did not struggle with the Wake defense as much as we struggled against ourselves. It is a mark of a good program to win on the day when things go against you. We have that now, where we never had that in the past. I admit that we would be 2nd in the SEC east and probably 3rd in the west, although I think a Tech-LSU game this year would be very entertaining. Auburn, Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina have all had offensive problems this year, and frankly we would outscore them. And I would love to know how Georgia Tech football players have enough time in a day to take a bus to Georgia State and back and still attend practice. meetings, and weightlifting.

Losers with class

November 11th, 2009
11:20 am

Cherokee – her’s my thinking. Tech beat you last year when you had a much better team. This year, Tech is better than last year. SUM TOTAL=YOU LOSE AGAIN!

Joey Hamilton

November 11th, 2009
11:20 am

y0,

NeBodiEz g0tZ a ReQuEsT 4 a LiCeNzE pLaTe? I bEe SelLiNg sUm cUsToMz 0n dEe SiDe!!!

The Riddler

November 11th, 2009
11:22 am

Jaded Jacket, I just ran into your boy Jonathan Dwyer. He needs some help on his pre-calculus. Don’t worry, his work is not due until after football season. I think that was the arrangement they had with Joe Hamilton.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
11:22 am

Loser. I believe conjecture is the basis for this blog. An OPINION based on where tech falls in the SEC?? The only think I know factually this year is that tech won close games against MSU and Vandy, and I’ve ranked tech above those two teams.

Just a plain ol' loser

November 11th, 2009
11:22 am

Yeah, losers with class, you’re exactly right. Why even bother playing games this year since we all know rankings and titles are given out based on what was done last year. You’re a genius!!!!!

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
11:24 am

tech’s academic standards are to low for admission to the sec.

Tech75

November 11th, 2009
11:24 am

Mike – if you don’t have anything new to add, just stay away from the keyboard.

Please. You are embarrassing yourself further with every new post.

mIcHaEl JoHnNySoN

November 11th, 2009
11:25 am

HaY JoEy!!! CaN u MaKe MeE a SwEeT tAg 4 mAh ExCaLaDe!?!?!?!

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
11:25 am

Jaded jacket,

The sec plays more cupcakes in its noncon schedule than the acc? Surely you jest? Unless of course Richmond, William & Mary, elon, murray state. gardner webb, etc are considered powerhouses.

As far as interconference records go the ACC is 2-2 against the Colonial Athletic conference this season. That pretty much says it all about the acc.

Sec is cupcakes conference!

November 11th, 2009
11:26 am

the ACC is far superior in football and Academics……As all and i mean all my TECH colleagues on this blog aree ………Georgia has zero chance of beating TECH on the 28th, enough said

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
11:26 am

Bradley, you MUST own stock in pharmasutical companies cause you sure sell more blood pressure medicine than anyone else on earth.

Best, willie

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
11:27 am

SEC is: right. take the points and bet heavy.

Mary and William

November 11th, 2009
11:28 am

what acc team played her and how did it come out…and Richmond, the Acc played richmond….seriously i didn’t know that ..you are making that up you sec redneck

Quincy Carter

November 11th, 2009
11:28 am

Tech academic standards aren’t that hard. Hell, they rolled out the red carpet for me when I accepted their offer.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
11:28 am

Wiley. Unfortunately for Duke, Thad can’t win the game by himself. He’ll need some assistance from the other 21 players.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
11:28 am

lunchtime. think i’ll call the orkin man to come spray this blog for bugs while i’m away.

BJohnDawg

November 11th, 2009
11:29 am

Scott V.

Georgia loses to Tech by 3 points…and they got Blasted? What planet do you play football on? A 3 point lose is a lose sure, but it is not a blasting.

If so, they I guess Tech was Blasted 7 out of the 8 last seasons.

You Tech fans kill me. Two years ago you barely beat a terrible Notre Dame team, and the Tech Nation proclaimed a NC.

Now you will 8 and loss 1 in a season where your toughest opponent is Clemson or maybe a terrible Georgia team and you guys are crowing again.

To Mark B…..Tech has survived a close one at Clemson, a blasting at Miami, a close one to a terrible FSU team, a close one to wait for it Wake Forest…do you really think they could survive the SEC east and one or two quality West Teams with that thing they call a defense?

Alabama would ram the ball down their throats. I am not so sure Dwyer would be on the field long. Florida would smoke them. We have already seen what LSU’s defense would can do to them. Do you think they forgot how to play the option. Dont think so. Tenn would pass happy on them. Arkansas as well. And frankly I am not sure they can beat Georgia this time around.Clearly they can not stop anyone. It might be another 50 point game. Maybe its who has the ball last.

But I will say this…CP Johnson has them playing well. And has proven his ability.

Johnny Weissmuller

November 11th, 2009
11:31 am

HBTD

Did you watch the LSU v GT game?? Did you see the stat lines other than the score? GT put up over 300 yards of total offense on LSU and we’ve only gotten better since then. It was our 3 turnovers that eventually lead to the blow-out

LSU beat us, but to say we were not able to compete is ridiculous.

LSU has gotten marginally better this season and GT has gotten MUCH better – GT is 9-1 with 2 games left to play that we will be favored in – not to mention our #7 BCS ranking…2-0 vs the SEC

GT’s defense is not there yet, but I would say GT has a good shot at beating LSU, Bama, or UF in a bowl game this year.

1Jacket7

November 11th, 2009
11:31 am

Here’s a scenario for you Mark. Tech 7 then there is Boise, Cincy, TCU, Texas, ALA, UF. Ok. TCU loses this weekend to Utah. Tech beats Duke and is now #6
Cincy can lose to WVU or Pitt. Tech moves up to #5
Boise loses to Nevada, Nevada leads nation in rushing, T. O. P advantage Nevada. Boise is miffed about not moving up. Upset Nevada. Tech beats UGA and is now #4
Texas loses to Kansas ST or Nebraska in Big 12 Championship game. Tech wins ACCCG against Clemson who will be in Top #20 then. Tech moves to #3.
UF and Alabama play and one has to lose. UA loses drops to #3. Tech moves up to #2.
It can happen and if TCU goes done this weekend, believe this scenario to be probable than doubtful. Oh, Tell Jeff.

Get It Right

November 11th, 2009
11:31 am

Close, but to spot on, Mark. Alabama beat Clemson when the Tigers were beginning to fall apart at the start of the year. LSU beat GT at the end of their first year with Johnson’s new offense

Dennis

November 11th, 2009
11:31 am

I dont agree with your premise, but, What would be UGA record if they played Miami, Clemson, FSU, VA Tech and played three teams from SEC Vandy, Miss State, and pick another for the UGA replacement, say Ole Miss. I would say they would be five and four and no different than they are now.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
11:33 am

Kumar @11:14 – Paul Johnson had nothing to do with the schedule Tech has played under his tenure. Schedules are set many years in advance. He just plays (and beats) the teams that are on the schedule.

Paul’s Johnson @11:15 – Forget career numbers. Stop living in the past. There are three SEC quarterbacks that have higher passer ratings THIS YEAR than Josh Nesbitt. Unfortunately for you, Cox isn’t one of them.

Tell it like it is

November 11th, 2009
11:33 am

Tech would finish high in the SEC.UGA would have trouble in the ACC with teams like VA Tech Miami Clemson GA Tech and posibly wake and duke.So that mite be the ultimate question, how would UGA do in the ACC?

middle tennessee state

November 11th, 2009
11:33 am

i think we beat an acc team too, don’t forget about us!

The Riddler

November 11th, 2009
11:34 am

Answer me this. How come you never see any Tech athletes on campus at Georgia Tech? Because they take all of their classes at Georgia State.

bertha

November 11th, 2009
11:35 am

As usual, the ACC has proven to be the weakest BCS conference in the nation. Another example of why their automatic BCS bowl bid should be stripped. 5 teams currently below .500 and they play disgraceful OOC games. What a joke.

Otto

November 11th, 2009
11:35 am

GTinJC, Thanks for the history class on 1920s football.

The Riddler

November 11th, 2009
11:35 am

Tech82, at least Joe Cox can read and write unlike your boy Nesbitt.

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:36 am

get over it dawg fans, Mark Richt can ‘t beat us!!

Johnny Weissmuller

November 11th, 2009
11:36 am

BJohnDawg

Glad to know that you think beating Notre Dame 33-3 in South Bend is considered ‘barely beating a team’

I guess UF just barely beat you guys this year when the won 41-17

Ben Derover

November 11th, 2009
11:37 am

Tech would suck in any league. That will be proven when a terrible Georgia team beats their azz.

The Answer

November 11th, 2009
11:37 am

You really think Tech athletes would fair any better taking classes at State? They’re actually at Morehouse and Atlanta University. Very sad state of affairs at the Trade School.

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
11:37 am

The Dawg D stopped GT the first half last year and gave up the second half. This year Willie’s boys finish the drill and Dawgs win 34-17……GO DAWGS!

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:37 am

and leave notre dame out of it we were alot better than mighty Navy

wiley

November 11th, 2009
11:37 am

Crimson nation…any FCS school is a cupcake…but lets keep in mind that Richmond was the FCS national champion and dominated FCS football last year by a large margin…they beat duke. The argument he is making is this…the ACC’s best team(GT) played one FCS school Jville State(6-3), and the SEC’s best two schools (Alabama and UF) play 3 cupcake schools each like Troy, FIU(2-7), North Texas(2-7), Chattanooga(5-4), and Charleston Southern(4-5). The OOC schedule for the SEC’s elite is pathetic…but thats not by design. Alabama has a good OOC slate for the next few years and will start a series with GT in 2013 and 2014…cant wait to see what PJ and Saban have accomplished by then.

cherokee

November 11th, 2009
11:38 am

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:36 am
get over it dawg fans, Mark Richt can ‘t beat us!!

What is 7-1 record if he can’t beat you

Ben Derover

November 11th, 2009
11:38 am

To all you Tech idiots. This is the same LSU team that waxed your azz last year. Ypu are the same GA Tech team. Enough said.

dap01

November 11th, 2009
11:38 am

On Techs best year they would be only an average SEC team.

They belong in the ACC. If UGA don’t change, perhaps they should change to the ACC.

SEC 4 of last 6 bcs titles we rule!

November 11th, 2009
11:39 am

GTinJC,

You can’t fathom that the acc has 4 teams in the top 25 while the sec only has 3. Here’s one for you . The sec has 3 teams in the top 10 while the acc only has 1 team in the top 10. Stick that in your pipe tough guy. One other note also. Spots 15-25 change constantly. Don’t be surprised if the the acc teams in spots 15-25 lose and drop out in a week or so while 1 or 2 sec teams like Auburn or Ole Miss jump back into the top 25. Spots 15-25 are fluid and when its all said at the end of the season the sec will have more teams in the top 10 as well as the top 25, more bowl victories as usual, and another bcs championship as usual.

root4au

November 11th, 2009
11:40 am

Not sure GT would beat UTK. I think UTK would stop GT’s running game while UTK’s offense is good enough to score on GTs weak D. Also, AU/GT would be high scoring. Neither D is that good but both O’s would have a field day. Bottom line, GT would fall somewhere between 4th and 6th in the sec.

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
11:40 am

Dawgs win 34-17. GO DAWGS!

luby

November 11th, 2009
11:40 am

I have a theory as to why Tech students are getting mugged everyday. I don’t think it’s the fact they’re necessarily getting mugged, persay, I think when the see the likes of thugs like Burnett, BeBe, Tarrant, Thomas, Jones and Nesbitt walking around, they just decide to empty out their wallets and purses and run.

Jared

November 11th, 2009
11:40 am

Jackets dont have the Defense right now to compete against the upper tier teams in the SEC.

I wouldnt be so worried about them “shutting down” our offense, though. Even the LSU game, a decisive trouncing, was more a product of the special teams game than anything else.

Just don’t forget that this is only year 2. The recruits will be very comparable in the skill positions (probably better at QB), and the OL will be better in the next couple of years. We have been recruiting the defense very heavily so I look for that to bounce back in the next 2 years as well.

PTC DAWG

November 11th, 2009
11:41 am

Big Dawg fan here, and as others have said, I’m not so sure GT wouldn’t beat LSU this year.

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:41 am

georgia’s chances on the 28th ..zero..notta..none…no way..notgonna happen!!!!!!!

Ben Derover

November 11th, 2009
11:42 am

PTC Dawg…. Tech didn’t beat the same LSU team last year.

Tech75

November 11th, 2009
11:43 am

Riddler – it hurts to be totally ignored, doesn’t it?

Of course, you wouldn’t be ignored if there was anything even remotely factual about your posts.

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:43 am

tech may bypass the bcs title game and play in the SUPER BOWL!!!!

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
11:44 am

WILD DAWG ! DAWGS BEAT TECH 43-17…GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Johnny Weissmuller

November 11th, 2009
11:44 am

luby

Funny that all of those players you mentioned are african-american

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
11:44 am

I don’t know where Tech would be in the SEC. I do know I would like to play the games and let THAT stand. I do know Tech did pretty good in the SEC when we were a memember. Good Not Great but that was then and this is now. Tech is 9-1 now and lost to LSU last year. Tech’s record against the SEC as of the past few years(2000) is Pretty Damn Good. Tech against UGA is not good but other than LSU no SEC team has beat TECH so think about that Dawg fans.

Johnny Test

November 11th, 2009
11:45 am

Mark, I disagree. I think Arkansas would pass Tech silly and win. I think Tennessee could beat them with defense. Vanderbilt and Miss. St combined for 8 turnovers against Tech. That’s how they won those games. Anyone in the SEC with a decent defense and the ability to throw the ball could beat them.

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:45 am

Mark Richt never really beat tech, we gave him those seven games , he is a terrible coach with a terrible record!!!!!!!!!!!!

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
11:46 am

WILD DAWG RULES! WILLIES BOYS PREVAIL. DAWGS BEAT TECH 34-17. GO DAWGS!!!!!!!!!!

Mark Bradley

November 11th, 2009
11:46 am

I’m not sure Tennessee could score enough to beat Tech. I’m not sure Arkansas would stop Tech even once.

revwreck

November 11th, 2009
11:47 am

hey Ben 11:38….I like the way you think, this is the same Tech team that kicked your butts last year…but this year you are missing your qb, rb and the receiver that caught all your passes last year..according to you we would then win again right?

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
11:47 am

the dawgs have always been a second rate program compared to tech, especially mark richt’s teams!!!!!!!!!

wiley

November 11th, 2009
11:47 am

This is not the same LSU or the same GT teams from the bowl game last year. GT lost 3 NFL d lineman, and NFL O lineman, and a cornerback. LSU lost people also to the NFL…not the same teams…not the same game. Look at our offensive numbers this year…of the charts compared with last. Defense got worse…offense got better…I would love to play an SEC team on any given saturday. No fear from this Jacket fan.

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
11:48 am

Wiley,

Be for real dude. Everybody plays cupcakes. Everyone has 4 noncons and speaking for us we played 2 time defending acc champ VT and pounded them in a game that wasn’t nearly as close as the score. Sure, the other 3 teams were cupcakes but who the hell doesn’t play at least 3 cupcakes. Tech does. They play Jax state and the 2 worst teams in the sec. The 2 worst teams in Vandy and MSU are only marginally better than and FIU or North Texas. And why isn’t you didn’t schedule a middle tier sec team like an Ole Miss or Ark instead of the 2 traditional doormats?

Show me one program that has a non con schedule of teams like Ohio state, USC, Texas, etc. Nobody in any conference does that and for good reason.

Also, we play Penn State next year. Do you play a noncon next year against a team that has been best or 2nd best in a bcs conference the last few years?

Tech plays the bottom 2 cellar dwellers in the sec and then brags about beating them. Big deal.

The acc ooc scheduling is just as pathetic if not substantially worse than the sec. Just look at some of the teams on their schedules. Its horrific.

Last, trying to play up Richmond is a joke. They may be the best of the double a teams but you know what? They are still double a.

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
11:50 am

tHAT’S WHY RICHT KICKED YOUR ASS 7 OUT OF 8 YEARS THERE tech rules.

Paul's Johnson

November 11th, 2009
11:50 am

Tech82:

“Paul’s Johnson @11:15 – Forget career numbers. Stop living in the past. There are three SEC quarterbacks that have higher passer ratings THIS YEAR than Josh Nesbitt. Unfortunately for you, Cox isn’t one of them’

Those ratings are the same for both QB’s for the 2009 season and yes Cox does have a higher rating than Nesbitt. As a QB, I think Cox is terrible and I think Nesbitt is probably worse as a passer, better arm strength but worse in accuracy.

Get the facts next time Einstein.

Ben Derover

November 11th, 2009
11:51 am

revwreck you may be correct. GA Tech may beat GA. That is not the question. The question is where would Tech finish in the SEC. I say it is like this.

Florida/Alabama
LSU
South Carolina/Tennessee
Arkansas
Georgia Tech

So Tech would be around 7th.

Dawgdad

November 11th, 2009
11:53 am

Mark, I know columns have to be written, but can’t we wait awhile before cannonizing the Bumblebees. There are a few more games to be played. You don’t get to heaven before the end of your life and they haven’t beaten the Dawgs yet. This column will look really funny in hindsight.

The Bees are in the Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Miss St, range of the SEC. The Dawgs belong there as well, this year. Hopefully it will turn out to be a rebuilding year and not a trend. The All Crummy Conference continues to underperform most every year. Yes, the Bees are one of the best of these weak sisters. Remember how the ACC imported Miami and FSU to improve their sorry lot, only to have those schools play down to the level of the weak sisters.

Tech75

November 11th, 2009
11:53 am

Crimson Nation – have to call you out on your logic here.

“who the hell doesn’t play at least 3 cupcakes. Tech does. They play Jax state and the 2 worst teams in the sec.”

So – does that mean that you actually have 5 cupcakes on YOUR schedule (your 3 D2 cupcakes plus MSU and Vandy)?

You can’t have it both ways.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
11:54 am

Crimson nation im not denying that fact or attacking Alabama and UF for scheduling those teams. GT has played some scrubs in the past as well…its part of college football. I was just clarifying a point that was made by a previous poster. Why schedule tough teams when it can only hurt you…look at UGA. If they schedule 3 cupcakes this year they may actually look like an average team. Im not attacking saban or the team…they dont make the schedule.

Sautee

November 11th, 2009
11:54 am

Apples and Oranges AGAIN, for the second straight blog.

Dadgum Bradley, you’re getting to be as lame as ESPN Nation. It’s a worthless argument.

Yes, you got lots of hits form the tech and uga faithful, but how about a blog discussing something from REALITY and not merely conjecture?

In case you can’t tell, I’m no fan of “reality shows” either. Sports have great appeal because they are unscripted.

I think you are a pretty good writer, as I’ve told you through the years. But how about some reality in the blogs.

Johnny Weissmuller

November 11th, 2009
11:55 am

Ben Derover

You are delusional if you think Ark, Tenn, or Carolina are better than GT

Ark’s defense is ranked 56th – GT would hang at least 40 points on them
Tenn was beat at home by UCLA team that is 4-5 playing in the Pac-10
Carolina barely beat NC State who is 4-5 as well

You are very delusional

hatfieldgeoff

November 11th, 2009
11:56 am

Hey JacketNation,

Who were those players buying their weed from Rueben Houston? Yes, Ga. Tech has its own criminal element. Ninety-nine percent of UGAs “criminals” are immature young men who don’t get their license renewed, drink underage at a frat party or ride scooters on closed streets and a few more serious incidents like DUIs (ala John Dewberry, remember him Tech fans). People that live in glass houses … you know the rest. JacketNation what a pompous A$$ you are. That’s the real problem with Tech football gaining respectability, all of you fair weather tech fans start scurrying out of the woodwork like roaches, where were you hiding the last 7 years.

revwreck

November 11th, 2009
11:56 am

wasnt responding to the question….mostly being called idiots…but I dont care where we are in the SEC as long as UGA is below us

Ramblin Wrecker

November 11th, 2009
11:58 am

Mark Bradley,

I think you miss the point when you try to make this about conferences. The reason GT is behind Florida, Alabama and LSU is because everybody else in the country is too (at least Florida and Bama, most everybody is behind LSU). GT isn’t behind those programs because they reside in the SEC. It’s because those programs are historically predisposed to be good, because of tradition and excellent recruiting bases and they took it the extra step by adding the best head coaches in the game. Now I’d not say Les Miles is among the elite coaches, but he’s at least good enough to keep what Nick Saban built in Baton Rouge above water. Saban and Urban Meyer have elevated their programs to the top of the mountain. I’d like to think Paul Johnson is doing the same thing for GT. Hell, it’s only year two and we’re at #7 in the BCS and if not for the unusual season we’re having with 6 unbeaten teams in November, they’d be higher. Give Paul Johnson another season (with Nesbitt, Dwyer, Thomas, Burnett and DMorgan) and he’ll be beating Urban Meyer or Nick Saban for the national title.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
11:58 am

Crimson you do know BAMA finally agreed to play Tech in a few years right? The Vols still wil not play Tech. Tech Did play Auburn when Auburn was a top 5 team and we beat them Home and Away with Reggie Ball no less. HAHAHAH. I would like to play the gamecocks. Columbia is a nice town and a good trip. Ole Miss moved the game with a few more years away. What can TECH do to make a SEC team play us?

TELL me Crimson what can TECH do other than win our games and meet a better brand of SEC in a Bowl?

Crimson why didn’t you guys move the TECH game to next year when you found a spot for Ga. State HAHAHAHAHA you go you big bad Bama boy.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
11:59 am

Pi$$onadawg. Of course you (as a fan) would like to play an SEC schedule. Duh!! It is the most competative and exciting brand of football in the country hands down. That’s what everyone’s be saying for the past several years (except for tech). Unfortunately for you and your tech bretheren, you get a steady dose of WF, Duke, Va and UNC when you’re not playing a D2 like Gardner Webb or Jax. State. It’s no wonder your school can only fill up about half the “crackerbox” with this kind of schedule. I understand your frustration and depression with that schedule, but unfortunatey for the tech fan, that’s what ya’ll are stuck with. I hear Bama is on the schedule in 2012 and of course UGA every other year, so that should give ya’ll some hope of being able to see a quality team come to town.

wiley

November 11th, 2009
11:59 am

I have a friend who smoke weed with current UGA players last summer…lets not get in this argument. Your dumb to think college students wouldnt…im sure you did in college.

dogone

November 11th, 2009
11:59 am

dawgs 32 and 12 against tech since 1965

why

November 11th, 2009
11:59 am

Mark, why do you cherry pick the 3 games in Atlanta? Compile the ACC vs. SEC head to head record for all games in 2008 and 2009.

Comparing 2 leagues of 24 teams by looking at 3 games? Why do I waste my time even reading these articles.

GT Nuke

November 11th, 2009
12:00 pm

A freind of mine at work put this comparison together, so I don’t want to take credit for it. but I think he does a good job of making the case for this year anyway.

If Tech played Georgia’s schedule it would result in the following (according to Sagarin’s predictor):
@ Ok St – 4 pt W
USCe – 14 pt W
@ Ark – 3 pt W
Ariz St – 16 pt W
LSU – 6 pt W
@ Tenn – 1 pt W
@ Vandy – 25 pt W (as seen this year)
Florida – 7 pt L
Tenn Tech – 45 pt W
Auburn – 12 pt W
Kentucky – 14 pt W
Georgia – 14 pt W (as you will see in a few weeks)

So Tech would be 7-1 and would finish 11-1 in the regular season if playing Georgia’s schedule.

By comparison, if Georgia played Tech’s schedule:
Jacksonville St – 11 pt W
Clemson – 6 pt L
@Miami – 10 pt L
UNC – 4 pt W
@Miss St – 4 pt L
@FSU – 5 pt L
VPI – 10 pt L
@UVA – 1 pt L
@Vandy – 9 pt W
Wake – 6 pt W
@Duke – 2 pt W
@Tech – 14 pt L

So Georgia would currently be 3-6 and would finish 5-7

tech rules

November 11th, 2009
12:01 pm

mark richt can’t even compete with tech!!!!!!!!!!!!!

friend at work..and gtnukedork

November 11th, 2009
12:03 pm

i think georgia beat vandy by 24…moron

BankerDawg

November 11th, 2009
12:03 pm

Perhaps it’s just blog hate, but I don’t understand the Nesbitt doubters that have surfaced.

If he finishes out the year at this pace, he will most likely be a dark horse Heisman candidate to begin next year.

Great kid. Seems to be a born leader. I can’t imagine what he’ll look like next year after another year in this system.

GOOOOOOOOOO DAWGS! SIC ‘EM!

Johnny Weissmuller

November 11th, 2009
12:03 pm

dogone

Dawgs are 0-1 against GT since Paul Johnson

Soon to be 0-2

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
12:04 pm

Crimson I think BAMA has Tech for a Home and Home in the coming years so then you can say whay you will then. Bama could have moved Tech to next year but Bama chose to take on the Powerhouse Ga. State Panthers in their first season. Crimson you do know Old Miss moved the games with Tech a few more years out in stead of next year. Auburn did a Home & Home and lost both when they were a top5 team and beat you HAHAHAHA.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:05 pm

TT. In case you missed it, Mark Richt won 7 consecutive games against tech before suffering his first loss last year. Are all tech fans as clueless as you? I thought ya’ll were supposed to be a well educated lot.

GT_Paula

November 11th, 2009
12:05 pm

Tech would be .500 or better with every team except Alabama and Florida, and maybe win its division in a good year.

This week: Auburn 31, UGA 20. Just another UGA beatdown in a season of beatdowns.

dogone: re

November 11th, 2009
12:06 pm

dawgs are 31 and 13 against tech since 1965, not 32 and 12

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:06 pm

Wiley,

Then we may actually agree on something. My only point is that everyone schedules their fair share of scrubs and there are 3 ways of doing it. Ole Miss plays 4 pansies. That’s one way.

Bama plays one team that is elite in its conference and is usually 1st or 2nd(VT and Penn St) fit this bill and then plays 3 cupcakes. That’s a 2nd way.

Georgia and Tech both take the 3rd route. Neither plays an elite team that usually finished in the top 3 in its conference. But both play 2 decent middle tier teams from bcs conferences. Vandy is horrendous this year but MSU is an okay team despite their record. Plus Tech plays Georgia so I give them credit for playing 2 decent bcs conference names and 2 cupcakes in Vandy and Jax State.

The dawgs I actually think have one of the toughest schedules if not the toughest. They play one cupcake Tenn Tech and 3 decent middle tier teams in Arizona State, Okla state, and Tech. But things change in a year and Tech qualifies this year as an elite team within its conference and OK state may not be elite but they are certainly a solid 7-9 win team every year and ASU is also a decent program.

This to me is the 3rd route. Play 2 decent teams and 2 cupcakes. Tech has this schedule this year and Georgia just happened to have a year where they play one really good team in Tech, 2 decent teams, and one cupcake.

Most teams when you get down and look at it play one decent but not great team like a Okay state or ASU and play 3 cupcakes. To me this is the worst way to schedule but unfortunately there are a lot of teams both in the acc and sec who schedule this way. We should at least be able to agree on that.

A_GaSou_Eagle

November 11th, 2009
12:07 pm

To Ben Derover:

Yo, Athens just called me during class and said they are missing the village idiot. You should wake up from that ditch you passed out in and find your way back home.

To jdawg14:

What you obviously don’t understand (from your last comment) is that the term “2nd rate” appeals to more than winning football games. Yeah UGA has won a lot in recent seasons. They have also tried to steal the phrase “Criminoles” from Florida St. What kind of mindset does the coach instill on the players when they decide that they arent going to court just because they dont want to? Lack of discipline, lack of respect, arrest history, etc… is what makes UGA 2nd rate to GT as far as I can remember. Maybe UGA can invest in an NCAA football coach at the end of the year and fire this pop icon they have now.

facts straight

November 11th, 2009
12:07 pm

Dogone, yeah get your facts straight, lmao, give us jackets some credit!

GT_Paula

November 11th, 2009
12:07 pm

Georgia Tech 48, Duke 17. Count on it.

hilariously funny

November 11th, 2009
12:09 pm

its absolutely hilarious to listen to tech fans defend with one year a lifetime of beatings at the hands of the DAWGSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!

UGAIsSoLastYear

November 11th, 2009
12:10 pm

Alabama did not smash VT. And the GT-LSU game is not an indicator. We had beaten UGA in Athens. That was our bowl game. Playing in a meaningless game after that meant nothing. Play LSU in the regular season, year in and year out, and Johnson would win more than Miles – you can take that to the bank. Just as he will versus Richt. For those UGA fans that STILL don’t see this or recognize this, you are not really smart college football fans.

Benjamin

November 11th, 2009
12:10 pm

I would take Tech over LSU, so I’ll put them at the three spot. (I think Florida or Bama would take ‘em.)

Great blog piece, Mark.

UGAIsSoLastYear

November 11th, 2009
12:11 pm

It’s not about 1 year mr hilarious. It’s about a coach. And we have a winner! He is only beginning. Open your eyes poor boy.

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:13 pm

Pi$$onadawg,

We play Penn State next year which lately has been a top 1 or 2 team in its conference. To play Tech which is now an elite team within its conference and Penn State along with Florida who we pick up regular season next year along with our regular sec schedule is quite a lot to ask for. Who would want that schedule? Also, we granted Georgia State the game as a favor in the same way that Georgia plays Georgia Southern or Tech plays Jax state. It gives those lesser schools exposure in building their program and much more importantly gives them badly needed cash to build their program.

And while you can brag about beating Auburn home and home you must also remember Georgia was still whipping you in those years as well. Or did you forget that?

hilariously funny: re to mr. hilarious

November 11th, 2009
12:14 pm

yeah we have a winner…no way Georgia has any chance this year ..none….zilch..hang it up…..dawgs…..notta chance…go jackets

The RIddler

November 11th, 2009
12:14 pm

RIDDLE ME THIS BATMAN, Why do I keep making proclamations with no proof? One would think students not taking any courses at their institution of choice would be a hot item for media outlets.

A_GaSou_Eagle

November 11th, 2009
12:14 pm

hilariously funny:

Actually we defend with 4 times as many Nat’l titles as UGA, A Heisman memorial trophy named after our head coach, when we left the SEC we had more SEC titles than UGA (5 to 4), oh…

and fewer players arrested than UGA. Get some history schoolboy.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
12:15 pm

If someone has the time can you findout the Tech lifetime record against the SEC and the UGA lifetime record against the SEC? I am just wondering. WAIT lets make Tech and UGA lifetime records against Bama, Florida, Tenn, LSU, and Auburn nobody in the SEC really matters after these teams anyway.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
12:15 pm

This big talk is fun and all, but I say save it for Nov. 28th. One thing I’m thankful for is that at least we get to actually play the game rather than hypothesizing “what if” as it pretains to Tech and UGAg.

Dawgs, you have owned us, for certain. One game at a time is all I’m saying. We won last year in a close one. This year, without the talent (e.g. Stafford and Moreno), you pups have no chance. It’s gonna be “All The Way Turnt Up” in The Flats. Joe Cox may even start crying.

Personally, I can’t wait to see Dwyer and Nesbitt put some poor Dawg LB on his back. Oh, and tell your DBs, those crack blocks are BRUTAL!

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia … see you punks on North Avenue.

weneedaplayoff

November 11th, 2009
12:15 pm

When I read the title of the article, I thought it would be a story about Tennessee Tech…
I guess the better question is why none of the BCS conference schools is taking Boise State up on their offer to play. TCU v.Boise for the National Championship this year. Remember that Utah beat the Tide in a more convincing manner than the Gators last year.

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:16 pm

UGAissolastyear,

We rolled up 500 total yards to VTs 150. The only thing that kept them in the game was Bama miscues, penalties, turnovers, various mistakes. At the end of the game we were knocking on the door at the 12 13 yard line and we just ran out the clock. Had we needed to we could have put up another field goal or td and won by 13 or 17. It was a statistical asskicking session and the facts back it up.

Matt

November 11th, 2009
12:16 pm

It’s funny that such a pointless question generates 5 pages in a little over 2 hours.

Really, who the hell cares? Does it have any bearing on Tech or the SEC teams?

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:18 pm

UGAIsSoLastYear.

“GT-LSU game is not an indicator. We had beaten UGA in Athens. That was our bowl game.”

Oh!! That would explain the team rings and “State Champion” t-shirts. Hmmmm. What will you guys come up with next?? I can hardly wait!

GT

November 11th, 2009
12:19 pm

HBTD: Another win against UGA, from the looks of it

Jefferson

November 11th, 2009
12:19 pm

What would Mark Bradley do at the Macon Telegraph would be the correct anology.

CB969

November 11th, 2009
12:20 pm

It’s pretty funny that Techsters are comparing this team to the 1998 team. You may recall that they lost to Boston College and Florida State that season. If those two schools, had been members of the ACC, Georgia Tech would not have won the Conference title.

Suck it Nerd

November 11th, 2009
12:20 pm

I’d put Tech 3rd. I think they would hang with FL and BAMA. They just keep the ball for so much of the game that the opposing team has to make the most of their opportunities.

A_GaSou_Eagle

November 11th, 2009
12:21 pm

HBTD:

State Champ > (is greater than, if you didn’t know) County/City champ.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:21 pm

Pi$$onaDawg.

“If someone has the time can you findout the Tech lifetime record against the SEC and the UGA lifetime record against the SEC? I am just wondering. WAIT lets make Tech and UGA lifetime records against Bama, Florida, Tenn, LSU, and Auburn nobody in the SEC really matters after these teams anyway.”

No idea where you’re heading with this one, but you sound desperate for something to try and make a meaningless point.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
12:22 pm

CB969 … urm, FSU joined the ACC in 1991. Thanks for playing, we have some lovely parting gifts for you.

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:23 pm

Pi$$onadawg,

Lifetime Alabama holds a winning head to head record against everyone in the sec and against UGA its 36-25 and against Tech its 28-21. I do know that if you look up each individual team’s record in the acc against the sec every single one of them I think except Tech has a losing record against the Sec.

You can look it up at stassen.com and view a team’s head to head record against other teams and against other conferences. I just looked it up. Only takes a second. Tech has an alltime record of .51 against the sec with a 177-169 record.

One other acc team like FSU might have a winning record against the sec but of the 12 acc teams I do know for a fact that at least 9 or 10 of them have losing records against the sec.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
12:23 pm

TECH is I can’t beleive this but it is perfect. Tech’s record against Bama, Auburn, Florida, LSU, and Tenn is 115-115-15. Well then I Tech has a 50 50 chance against the Big Bad SEC teams. I will try to find UGA records now.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:24 pm

GT_Paula

November 11th, 2009
12:07 pm
Georgia Tech 48, Duke 17. Count on it.

You really think it will be that close. It is Duke!!

A_GaSou_Eagle

November 11th, 2009
12:24 pm

CB969:

FSU WAS in the ACC that year. Game over. Insert more coins.

GT

November 11th, 2009
12:25 pm

I am the only one wondering where the hell the bama fan came from? Don’t you guys have your own newspapers/rivalries to deal with?

richtsPlugs

November 11th, 2009
12:25 pm

Has anyone checked out UF’s OOC schedule? How bout some cupcakes in the swamp!! How ’bout North Tex, FIU and Chatt for Bama?? – nothing like scheduling your patsies in Week 8,9,10… Stop beating up on the Sun Belt and migrate to the Pac-10 or the ACC.

GT is clearly better than any team in the SEC this year. C’mon MB – where’s your head?? Obviously Sagarin means nothing to you and your SEC popularity contest. GT vs UT for NCG!!

A_GaSou_Eagle

November 11th, 2009
12:25 pm

Crimson Nation:

YOu need to add in the Southern Conference too (predecessor to the SEC) because GT was in that, as well as the SEC before joining the ACC.

A_GaSou_Eagle

November 11th, 2009
12:27 pm

Crimson:

oh yeah and the Southern Intercollegiate Athletic Association which was before the Southern Conference.

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:27 pm

Gotta go and actually do some work but tonight I’ll look up each acc team’s record vs the sec and post it. Shouldn’t take but 5 minutes or so. I just looked up FSU vs the sec and alltime they are .40 winning % with a 44-66 record. I’ld be very surprised if there is anyone else in the acc that possibly has a winning record against the sec if FSU doesn’t. Possibly clemson given their dominance over S. carolina.

Tech75

November 11th, 2009
12:28 pm

S*** it Nerd – I am a bit less optimistic; I think it would depend on the first few possessions.

If Tech could get a lead, it would be tough to catch; however, the converse is true as well, given our weak D.

I think realistically Tech is somewhere between 7 and 12 in the rankings; just too inconsistent to portray us as a powerhouse yet.

However, if tech played its best game on both offense and defense, simultaneously, I do think we could hang with FL, and AL; TX I would still worry about, just because of the matchups when TX has the ball.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
12:28 pm

HBTD – yes, and it’s Duke coached by David Cutcliff and that has a tremendous passer in Thadeus Lewis. They’ll keep it close the first half and then Tech will take over the possession arrow in the 2nd, wear down the defense and score 21+ unanswered …

… the UGAg game will go along the same lines, excepting the part about keeping it close in the first half.

UGA 3 GA Tech 51

Count it!

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia!

gcs

November 11th, 2009
12:30 pm

Here’s the funny thing: delusional Tech fans think they could beat Alabama or Florida – notice they say “OR”. In the SEC, you have to beat both to become champ.

cccwww

November 11th, 2009
12:31 pm

LSU last three ACC opponets LSU 38- GT 3 LSU 48 – VT 7 LSU 40 – Miami 3
or combined LSU 126 – ACC 13
Next years Chick kickoff at the dome LSU 48 – North Carolina 0

We love playing ACC teams bring them on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
12:32 pm

Oh, and in case you forgot …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pruMPBJGDOU&feature=related

ENJOY!

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia!

TomB

November 11th, 2009
12:34 pm

Before the season, Mark said Tech would be a better team than last year, but because of a demanding schedule, probably wouldn’t have as good a record. Now that they have exceeded his expectations, he implies that somehow the SEC has better talent but this just doesn’t hold up to fact. Colin Peek, a former yellow jacket starts for Alabama and many of the recruits of the 2007 class at Tech were pursued by many SEC teams like GA, ALA and Fl, not to mention last years class as well. Maybe we shouldn’t be comparing these teams based on so called recruiting experts who somehow manage to always get it wrong…look at UGA as evidence.

Maybe Tech is not as good as ALA or Fl this year, but I sure would like to find out. And, there is only one way to do this…playing on Saturday. I disagree on LSU. Tech is better than LSU this year…even a couple touchdowns better.

narn

November 11th, 2009
12:34 pm

The ACC is laughable. They’re even worse than the Big 10. They should have their automatic bowl bid taken away

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:35 pm

If the so called #7 team in the land doesn’t have at least a 28 point half time lead against the Dukies, they’re obviously not as good as many people think. The 31 – 28 trailing a couple of weeks ago to Vandy and then the OT game with WF have already killed you guys nationally. There’s a lot of curiosity with Pee Jay’s tricked up offense that 90% of the Ga HS run, but there’s no respect for the program as a whole.

As far as your UGA prediction goes. I’ll take the 48 points and bet the farm? Something tells me that it might be a “little” closer than that.

Joshua Barlowe

November 11th, 2009
12:38 pm

Mark – until we get a better defense – I would agree with your thought. I might even put us third in the East behind Florida and Tennessee, who seems to be getting their act together.

However, if we get things straightened out on defense and in the kicking game, there’s no reason why we wouldn’t be able to complete for first in either SEC division.

Go Jackets!!

pointing out the obvious

November 11th, 2009
12:38 pm

The reason for Yech’s success this year is simple. The combined Win/Loss record for every team they have beaten this year is 43-39. Four games above .500, not to mention the 5 ACC teams that are currently under .500.

You’re welcome

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
12:41 pm

UGA is 148-156-14 against Bama, Auburn, Florida, Tenn, and LSU. UGA is not as good at beating or winning against the SEC big boys so much. Just wanted the #’s you guys like to throw around.

Anfin

November 11th, 2009
12:43 pm

Tech fans and Liberals are both cut from the same cloth. Disillusioned quacks that wouldn’t know a good thing if it jumped up and bit them in the arse. Maybe that’s why Tech produced the worst President in our nation’s history.

Pi$$onaBee

November 11th, 2009
12:45 pm

Weird how you left out UGA’s record against the tools from North Ave. As usual, a nerd fan having to cling to the coattails of other programs. What a loser.

CW

November 11th, 2009
12:47 pm

As a die-hard Tech fan, I think Bradley has it just about right. I sure would like to see Tech play either Florida or Alabama in the NC game, but the top three SEC teams just have size and speed that make it difficult for most other teams (Tech or otherwise) to be able to compete with them.

What are you STUPID?

November 11th, 2009
12:47 pm

I can’t wait to face the maggots. They are so over rated it’s nuts. Georgia is going to be them in their own back yard. I would love to get tech in the SEC. They would have to play the good teams, not the Dores and maroon dogs. Both whom they barely survived if it were not for a multitude of fumbles by both SEC teams.

pi$$onadawg

November 11th, 2009
12:48 pm

i know we have a bad losing record against Georgia..but thats not my point

What are you STUPID?

November 11th, 2009
12:48 pm

Tech has no business even being considered for a NC game. Let them play Navy in some armed forces bowl.

Nick Saban

November 11th, 2009
12:48 pm

Ryan

November 11th, 2009
12:46 am
I really think that we would beat Florida or Alabama if we were given the chance. This is the most explosive team since 1998-99. Florida and Alabama might have better defenses but thats about it. Ive watched LSU play this year and they struggled during some games also. All these teams I believe are very close together. Its too bad we dont have a playoff system where we can truly find out whos better.

THE HELL WITH GEORGIA!

GO JACKETS!

Can you hook me up with some of the stuff you are on ????
Tech would not put up 14 points on Fla are Bama yes you guys have a good team this year but dont get to crazy there Jackets

GTFan1

November 11th, 2009
12:50 pm

I agree that Tech would be a team no one would want to face with only one week of preparation.

In a seperate debate, I, Loyal Homer, totally got hosed on this debate. This guy is saying that computers are essentially the best and most objective part of the BCS. Ughh!

http://thesportsdebates.com/category/tsd/the-eyeballs-versus-computers-debate/

pi$$onadawg

November 11th, 2009
12:50 pm

we should have beat ya’ll more we just got bad breaks and bad calls…..

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:50 pm

Pi$$onadawg,

No surprise about Tech being 115-115 against the major sec powers. Tech used to be a major sec power itself and there was a time when the Tech-Bama game was the most intense and heated rivalry in the south.

GT,

This is not a georgia or georgia tech blog but a college football blog. I live in atlanta and there are plenty of bama, lsu, auburn and acc grads in atlanta from all over the place. Just as there are plenty of tech grads spread throughout the country and the world for that matter. Since I’ve lived here 20 years I have just as much right to peruse the local atl papers and blogs as you do. And the Tech fans who live in other states have just as much right to view and comment on the blogs in the papers in those states and cities. Lighten up a bit.

A GaSou eagle,

The stats don’t say if this includes the old southern conference or not. I know the old southern was the predecessor to the sec but I’m not sure the stats include the old southern conference.

ACC

November 11th, 2009
12:52 pm

Current ACC title tally.

Clemson: 13
FSU:12
Maryland: 9
Duke: 7
NC State: 7
NC: 5
Va. Tech: 3
Wake: 2
VA: 2

And the mighty YellowJackets come in with a whooping 1 and half. The half being in 1998 when they were caught cheating. Even South Carolina has one ACC title. Pathetic.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
12:53 pm

Mark, this whole premis is so hypothetical. its tantamount to asking what defensive coordinator in america is better than me.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:53 pm

Pi$$onaDawg. You seem to like numbers. Here’s series of numbers for you think about. 59-39-5!! Go Dawgs!!

Crimson nation

November 11th, 2009
12:54 pm

Pi$$onadawg,

Glad you like that stat site. Its easy and quick to look stuff up and in your case it looks like it certainly gives you more ammo to torment the dawgs. Good luck. I’m outta here.

pi$$onadawg

November 11th, 2009
12:54 pm

tech grads ..you have nerve calling us that…call us geniuses…………!!!! which is what we are …..and superior to every football program in the country…

TomB

November 11th, 2009
12:54 pm

Wow Anfin!… that was an incredible ignorant statement, but then again you are a UGA fan.I believe the President you are referring to was a graduate of the Naval Academy, not Georgia Tech. And, we know there are not any liberals at UGA, right?

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
12:55 pm

ACC, i thought s carolina was in the sec??

Really !!!

November 11th, 2009
12:56 pm

It’s about time to stop pounding your chest SEC ! I understand and agree that you have great football players, but this is football and on any given day when two good teams match up anything can happen. I’ve seen The Gators, Bama and LSU all have horrible games where Wake Forest and other ACC teams would have beaten them.

The same is true in the ACC and almost every conference across the U.S ( that stands for United States Dawg Fans). I believe Miss State should have beaten Florida the week before GTech spanked Miss State in front of their home crowd!!!!!!!!!!! Oh and last years whipping of Bama by Utah!! Woohoo – I think Utah forgot to read the memo.

SEC has done a great job of hyping themselves up to be the greatest conference of all time and most of the media has bought it. Its helped with recruiting and definately helped your payouts from sponsors. Good business, I will agree with that and that only until the games are played…

So let’s line em up and see what happens! Playoffs anyone??

Go Jackets!!! THWG!!!!!!!!!!

wow

November 11th, 2009
12:56 pm

pee on a dawg guy is a total dork…makes you techies look bad

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
12:56 pm

tech couldnt beat florida even with me as the d coordinator.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:56 pm

ACC. Good point, but see a loyal tech fan’s reasoning behind lack of titles.

pi$$onadawg

November 11th, 2009
12:50 pm
we should have beat ya’ll more we just got bad breaks and bad calls

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
12:58 pm

i mean if i were tech’s d coordinator.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
12:58 pm

pi$$onaDawg drop using my name and get your own. I don’t need your help or wnat it. The ACJ really needs to figureout how to protect the posting names.

hey willie wonka martinez nerdo dork!!!

November 11th, 2009
12:58 pm

south carolina used to be in the ACC you moron, do you know football or are you skipping elementary school today???? roflmao

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
12:59 pm

but ACC, do you have a water girl??

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
12:59 pm

Remember a year ago when a lot of Dawg fans were on the AJC blogs talking about how the GA Tech game was a “non-rivalry” in their eyes? Funny how much has changed in just a year …

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
12:59 pm

Uh oh!!! Willie’s a youngster!!! SC was in ACC for years before being an independent and then joining the SEC in the 90’s. You should go to class now and make your parents proud. Run along now.

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
12:59 pm

To GaSou Eagle.. Worry about your own Irk Russell wannabe football team!

Pi$$onaDawg is gutless

November 11th, 2009
12:59 pm

only reason this tool combined the records is because he knows UGA has been competitive with UT, LSU, Florida, Auburn over years, save Bama.

vs. Auburn – UGA is 2 victories away from evening it up
vs. Florida – UGA is still up by 7 victories
vs. LSU – - UGA is 3 victories away from evening it up
vs. UT – UGA if 5 victories away from evening it up
vs. Bama – UGA is down by 11 victories

As Pi$$onaBee said, you’re a loser.

leave it to a tech Grad!!! lmao

November 11th, 2009
12:59 pm

hey Pee wee on a doggie man, why don’t you figure it out genius boy

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:00 pm

hey willie wonka: what a coincidence: i havent used the words nerdo dork since i was elementary school. nap time .

best, willie

JF McNamara

November 11th, 2009
1:00 pm

3rd behind Florida and Alabama. They would beat LSU because LSU doesn’t have the offensive firepower. Its a real argument between Tech and LSU so you’ve got them about right.

and TECH is 23 years from evening it up

November 11th, 2009
1:01 pm

roflmao, good luck in this lifetime of catching the dawgs, nerddorks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

What are you STUPID?

November 11th, 2009
1:01 pm

Tom, Eric Zeier is a Georgia fan and player so I guess he is referring to himself. Tech’s run the PJ option because they could not cut it with a real offense. See CHAN GAILEY. If Vandy and Miss St. would play the maggotts then anyone will. Take away all the turnovers given by State and Vandy and tech loses both those games. Take away the refs flag and Clemson wins. I could go on and on. Tech has a good record this year against sub par teams and they have been very, very lucky in key games other than Miami who just beat them down. Even Dwyer quit in the at game.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
1:01 pm

Mark is the only person who knows who is who. Mark can’t we find away to get our on Blog names and not have them hi-jacked?

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:01 pm

hbtd, i’m old enough to remember when how bout them dogs was in fashion.

Buzzfan

November 11th, 2009
1:02 pm

There is no real evidence to claim Tech wouldn’t win against FL, AL, or LSU this year. Tech beat both Miss State and Vandy by more points than FL did, and FL is #1 in the nation. We did lose to LSU last year, but we beat GA which beat LSU so that was a wash IMHO.

Here is a link to the SI article on Tech & Coach PJ.

oattp://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/vault/article/magazine/MAG1162431/index.htm

yeah willie martinez go take a nap on momma's lap

November 11th, 2009
1:02 pm

James

November 11th, 2009
1:02 pm

“Nobody else in the ACC has the speed to keep up with Dwyer and Nesbitt and Roddy Jones; certain teams in the SEC do.”

Maybe I’ve been watching another GT team but I think anyone who watched the Clemson, Wake, Miami, and even the VT game saw defenses that really caused trouble for CPJ’s offense. GT is a good team but let’s not kid ourselves, they have been Hawkeye lucky several times this season.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:03 pm

i dont know why people hide behind fake names on this blog.

mike

November 11th, 2009
1:03 pm

HEY DO YOUR RESEARCH PEOPLE SAY THE SEC THE BEST BUT GO SEE IN 2008 ACC HAD A WINNING RECORD AGAINST THE SEC 6-4 BESIDES THAT GEORGIA FANS KILL ME THEY PULL FOR THE SEC FLORIDA OR ALABAMA OR LSU TO WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP WHEN THEM TEAMS WIN THEY BRING IN BETTER RECRUITS AND KILL GEORGIA EVEN WORSE THE NEXT YEAR.. I’M A TECH FAN IF FLORIDA STATE OR CLEMSON WAS PLAYIN FOR A CHAMPIONSHIP I WOULD GO FOR THE OTHER TEAM EVEN IF IT WAS COMONUIST CHINA I DONT CARE IF THE WHOLE ACC SUCK EXCEPT FOR TECH

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:04 pm

the guy who writes this column is not really named Mark Bradley. its Vince Dooley.

Cuttysark

November 11th, 2009
1:04 pm

Tech would be able to compete, but are still a few years away from having the type of interior linemen on both sides of the line of scrimmage to make this team very scary. But it is coming faster than anyone thinks.

Go to http://isportsweb.com for more Georgia Tech Football articles.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
1:05 pm

JacketFan,

Tech has always been a rivalry game, but it’s just down on the list. Maybe our 4th biggest rival at best. Unlike tool fans, we don’t eat, sleep and crap with thoughts of GT on our minds.

nick pagett

November 11th, 2009
1:06 pm

yes I think tech is a good football team, but let me bust that bubble you put up to be popped. ” no one can match up with nesbitt dwyer, and r. jone. let me remind you… Miami hung them out to dry. dwyer and company took advantage of the freshman last year… Miami knocked the option train off the track. good day

jdawg14

November 11th, 2009
1:06 pm

Paul Johnson is winning because he has Chan Gailey’s recruits. When they are gone he’ll just dry up and blow away.GO DAWGS!

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:06 pm

sorry Mark/Vince. i just couldnt keep the secret any longer.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:08 pm

STUPID – okay, and take away the lines on the field and the goalposts and you have a soccer pitch. That is the lamest argument ever. Let’s go back and look at UGAg’s SEC championship years and I’m sure we can find some penalties and takeaways to reverse and you have a couple of 6-7 seasons at old UGAg. Whatever. Good teams find a way to win. Tech has done it this year. UGA has not. End of argument.

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia!

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
1:08 pm

UGA as of 2008
UGA 24-36-3 vs Bama
UGA 49-49-6 vs Auburn
UGA 47-38-2 vs Florida
UGA 12-14-1 vs LSU
UGA 16-19-2 vs Tenn.
Yes UGA has been competative but still a losing record.
Tech was even that is better than the DAWGS yes or NO?

knob

November 11th, 2009
1:10 pm

Mike,

I think in 2008 the ACC and SEC split including bowl games. This being the best season the ACC had EVER had as a whole, and one of the worst the SEC had ever had as a whole, yet the ACC could only muster a .500 record against them.

Thanks

Losers with class

November 11th, 2009
1:10 pm

HBTD – 45-42. 9-1. 5-4. Because you like numbers, here are some very current ones for you.

Pi$$onaDawg was OWNED!!!

November 11th, 2009
1:11 pm

You just got slapped silly with some realities. Why don’t you post Tech’s records against FSU or UGA? What a douchebag.

Pi$$onaBee

November 11th, 2009
1:13 pm

As usual, PissonaDawg is forced to latch on to other teams’ coattails since the Dawgs own his sorry a$$ program.

Please, keep on humiliating yourself.

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
1:13 pm

Mike. It’s called RESPECT. When you see the SEC teams week end and out playing the schedules they do, you respect their programs. Tech gets no respect from the dawg nation (or anyone else outside the ACC for that matter) because of the schedules you guys play. You can’t beat up on weak sisters, pound your chest and yell about how great you are and expect to get it. Conversely, your fans make the program a ponit of laughter! Keep it up!

Richt, the jersey rotating queen

November 11th, 2009
1:14 pm

It’s official. His name is now “I Am Stupid”.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:14 pm

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:14 pm

DawgFan, actually, for me, the rivalry that keeps me up at night is FSU. I have more “old fashioned hate” for the Criminoles than any other team on Tech’s schedule. I don’t really “hate” Georgia that way. My ideal season would be one that had UGA and Tech matching up undefeated or damn close to it. I want success for all of the teams in this state – my pride as a Georgian supersedes my “hatred” of Athens A&M.

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia!

NikkiFree

November 11th, 2009
1:15 pm

Well, just rub it in why don’t you, Mark.

Richt, the jersey rotating queen

November 11th, 2009
1:16 pm

The only people that respect the fleabags is Nike because of all the jersey orders.

bawhahahahhaha!!!

November 11th, 2009
1:16 pm

This blog is classic!!! There’s nothing more funny than reading Yechers getting blasted with facts and watching them squirm!!!

#1 BAMA FAN

November 11th, 2009
1:17 pm

Hey TECH fans check the schedule for 2011. You will get your wish with BAMA on the schedule. Hope you have the rest of Grant Field finished two years later when we come to Atlanta cause they ain’t enough seats. RTR

Pipepimp

November 11th, 2009
1:17 pm

Moot Topic, F.Y.I.’Bama has played 4 ranked teams this year, Va. Tech, Ole Miss, South Carolina, and L.S.U.! Some may not be ranked now, but theu were at the time they played!

20+ more wins isn't respect?

November 11th, 2009
1:18 pm

Only douchebag tool fans would talk trash about a team that owns their program like a slave. Hilarious!!

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:18 pm

DawgFan,

I really don’t think of UGA all that my much. My big rivalry game is FSU. I really “hate” the Criminoles. Personally, I don’t “hate” UGA – my ideal season would match up Georgia Tech and UGA with undefeated (or damn close to it) records every year. My pride as a Georgian supersedes by “hatred” for the boys at Athens A&M.

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia!

D-fense wins championships

November 11th, 2009
1:18 pm

Have you seen GT’s?

lets have another Blue out!!!

November 11th, 2009
1:19 pm

Hey nerds. How did that “BLUE OUT” workout for ya last year in the Chick-fil-a Bowl?

Here we go again

November 11th, 2009
1:19 pm

OK – for all of you who like to talk about the “mighty” SEC – tell me this: Why do they play such a wimpy non-conference schedule?
AL – Fl Intl, North Texas, Chattanooga (let’s get real)
FL – Charleston Southern (that’s a team?), Troy, FL Intl (just like AL) – FL has only played one team this season that should have been a decent game – LSU
LSU – Washington (big deal at 3-7), LA-LFT, Tulane, LA-Tech – LSU has only played two decent teams this year – AL, FL, and maybe AU
AU – LA-Tech, Ball State, Furman, West VA (some of you will say that they have a good record, but just look at WV’s schedule, South FL beat them) – besides that, AU hasn’t played anybody except TN and LSU
TN – Western KY, Ohio, Memphis, lost to 5-4 UCLA – Once again, TN hasn’t played anyone besides FL, AL, and maybe AU.
People who don’t know the real facts talk about the “mighty” SEC’s record against non-conference opponents – when more than 80% of their NCOs are cream-puffs.

Tim

November 11th, 2009
1:20 pm

Who has Tech beaten? The Jackets beat one above-average team in VA Tech. Who else? Five of their wins have come against teams with losing records and another against Jacksonville State. Put Tech in the SEC and the Jackets would usually be playing for fifth or sixth place over-all. They beat two of the SEC’s dreg teams in Vanderbilt and Miss. State. It’s not as if they played Florida or Alabama. And do you remember what happened to them against LSU in last season’s bowl game? Mark, your recent articles make them sound like one of the great teams of all-time, which they are not.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:21 pm

EVERYONE!!!!

Please stop with the underlying racist talk on here. I have read too many comments on this thread (SEE 20+ wins). We can rip on each other all day, but there is no room for derogatory comments about players or fans. It’s just trashy.

Tim

November 11th, 2009
1:22 pm

Who has Tech beaten? The Jackets beat one above-average team in VA Tech. Who else? Five of their wins have came against teams with losing records and another against Jacksonville State. Put Tech in the SEC and the Jackets would usually be playing for fifth or sixth place over-all. They beat two of the SEC’s dreg teams in Vanderbilt and Miss. State. It’s not as if they played Florida or Alabama. And do you remember what happened to them against LSU in last season’s bowl game? Mark, your recent articles make them sound like one of the great teams of all-time, which they are not.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
1:23 pm

JacketFan,

In all honesty, I think if we took a fair poll of Tech fans, and had them list the top 5 teams they’d wish to beat, it’d be the order of:

1. UGA
2. FSU
3. Clemson
4. Va. Tech
5. North Carolina

For UGA it’d be:

1. UF
2. UT
3. Auburn
4. GT
5. LSU

I think those are pretty accurate assumptions

HBTD

November 11th, 2009
1:23 pm

Here we go again

November 11th, 2009
1:19 pm
OK – for all of you who like to talk about the “mighty” SEC – tell me this: Why do they play such a wimpy non-conference schedule?

ONE MORE TIME. BECAUSE THEY PLAY AN SEC SCHEDULE THAT INCLUDES NUMEROUS TEAMS IN THE TOP 5, 10 AND 20!!!! HOW MANY TIMES MUST WE SAY THIS BEFORE YOU PEOPLE GET IT. DANG. I THOUGHT YOU PEOPLE WERE SUPPOSED TO BE WELL EDUCATED.

Here we go again

November 11th, 2009
1:24 pm

jdawg14 – You said “Paul Johnson is winning because he has Chan Gailey’s recruits.” Oh, OK, then I guess your CMR beat FL (the first year) and won the SEC with Donnan recruits?? So – maybe we need to reevaluate CMR and state that since Donnan’s recruits have graduated – UGA/CMR hasn’t done much.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:24 pm

43-4-1 my record 1980-1983. techies never had a run like that.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
1:25 pm

Tech would beat LSU….what a riot…..I think we saw what happened last year with our 8-4 team against basically the same team Tech has this year. These nerd fans are quite the delusional sort. Try having acc teams not lose to I-AA teams and then maybe just maybe you will not be a laughing stock.

$tEpHoN MaRbUrY

November 11th, 2009
1:25 pm

I bEe aGrEeIn’ wIt mAh MaIn HoMiE jAcKeTfAn! StOp dA HaTiN’!!!!!

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:26 pm

here we go again: well, donnan’s recruits didnt exactly graduate. more like ran out of eligibility.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:27 pm

DawgFan,

Maybe so. My list looks like this:

1. FSU
2. Clumson
3. UGA
4. VA Tech
5. Duke

Also, I think that list for UGA is based on who has handed UGA the most and the most recent losses (e.g. UF and Tenn). If we hand it to you for a couple more years, I imagine that list will change up a bit.

LSU

November 11th, 2009
1:28 pm

Does 38 – 3 mean anything? That was last December!!!

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
1:28 pm

Jacketfan,

How about bringing me another bowl of the curry.

Techman '95

November 11th, 2009
1:29 pm

Lets be serious for a moment, gentlemen. We are quite possibly witnessing the beginning of a dynasty with what Coach Johnson is doing. We have the best team in the nation this year, handsdown. It’s criminal that Nesbitt isn’t in Heisman discussions, but that’s ok, he’ll get it next year along with our second National Championship in a row.

THWG!!!!

POGO

November 11th, 2009
1:29 pm

Who annointed the SEC as the standard bearer? RIDICKLIST!

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
1:30 pm

UGA vs ACC: I think UGA should join the ACC and maybe they could play for the MNC every year. But DAWGS don’t talk to bad about Wake.
UGA 02-02-0 BC
UGA 38-15-4 Clemson
UGA 01-00-0 Duke
UGA 06-04-1 FSU
UGA 55-38-5 GT
UGA 02-03-1 Maryland
UGA 07-04-1 Miami
UGA 15-06-2 UNC
UGA 06-01-1 NCSU
UGA 09-06-3 UVa
UGA 02-01-0 VT
UGA 01-02-0 Wake
Richt might want to join the ACC or find a new job in the ACC.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
1:30 pm

Jacketfan,

Duke as the 5th team you would most like to defeat. That is hilarious….Duke rarely fields a competitive team and this is whom you rank as the 5th team you would like to beat. You did not get this confused with basketball did you? Maybe cricket?

Shaye

November 11th, 2009
1:30 pm

Hey, Here we go again , you left VA Tech (ranked #7 at the time) out of the Tide’s non-conference schedule, Sure, there are some cream puffs in there, but don’t leave that one out.

For the most part, I agree with Mark, not only on where I’d put GA Tech, but also on why (basically, defense). I disagree with the folks who say the ACC is the worst of the “big” conferences. FSU and Miami have just not been up to par lately, which I think accounts for a lot of that, and other conferences are overrated. (How else explain USC?) I have watched many SEC games this year (and many, many other years) and have managed to watch at least parts of many GT games. Sure, they’ve stumbled here and there, but who hasn’t? You certainly can’t say Florida, Bama, or Texas has looked dominant in all their games, either, and yet they are still–correctly–ranked as the top 3.

That said, Roll Tide!

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:30 pm

20+ (Marbury) – Alright, wonderbread. That’s about enough of that. Just like a racist, lowlife to hide behind a computer. Real tough, big man. Bring that talk to the Varsity on Nov. 28th. I’ll be in the parking lot, champagne-colored F-150, grilling ribs and steaks with some of my “homies.” We’ll be glad to feed you.

TomB

November 11th, 2009
1:31 pm

If we are comparing stats then just look at how Miss State’s defense shut LSU down, but couldn’t come close to stopping Tech. Tech punted once I believe in that game. This doesn’t mean anything because GT’s achilles heel has been it’s defense this year. But I’m sick of all you UGA fans throwing stats around defending the SEC so lets compare. Vanderbilt was suppose to have this great defense(look at their stats in the mighty SEC), but couldn’t come close to stopping Tech(600+ total yards). How do you explain this UGA fans critical of Tech’s high school offense? Two of the better defenses in the SEC(stats support this) couldn’t come close to stopping Tech’s offense. Go figure.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
1:32 pm

JacketFan,

Yes and no. UF has always been our biggest rival though, dating back to when they first decided to play the game in Jacksonville. We have had a bitter rivalry with UT over the years and the Auburn/UGA game is the oldest rivalry in the south. So, I think the list I gave for UGA stands the test of time more so than Tech’s. But yes, recent results does fuel the games a lot depending on the win or losing stretches.

red5.ws

November 11th, 2009
1:32 pm

Mark you and Jeff are gonna enjoy some crow on 11-28-09.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:34 pm

Les – the list was about rivalry games. For me, beating Duke in football is a moment to retaliate for their owning us in basketball. It’s just a personal thing. Kind of like LSU and Ole Miss. LSU owns Ole Miss every year, but the rivalry is still strong from the 1950s.

POGO

November 11th, 2009
1:35 pm

National Championships and the best record of any conference in BCS bowls gives you bragging rights. By the way…..acc is 2-9 in BCS games. The way you get to claim you are the best is by proving it on the field…..hope this clears it up for you.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
1:37 pm

NO, it is the #1 team we play every year:
Clemson The Hated
UGA The Bad
FSU The Bowden
VT The Auburn of the ACC
UGA The DAWGS just because.

Pi$$onaDawg is legally retarded

November 11th, 2009
1:38 pm

Richt is 11-1 against the ACC has head coach. The lone loss coming by 3 points. Choke on it.

DA

November 11th, 2009
1:38 pm

Oh so, Ga. Tech is now the class of the ACC and they haven’t won the ACC championship yet. They were a fourth down away from giving the Coastal back to Miami on Saturday night. Win three ACC championships in 5 years like Va. Tech and get back to me.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:38 pm

DawgFan, funny thing is that I used to pull for Georgia every game against UF in the Spurrier years. He was QB coach when my dad played at Tech – my dad despised that man more than any other coach he has ever encountered. I think that may be why Duke is on that list too.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
1:38 pm

Hearing all of the Tech fans talk about how great they are is just funny, I don’t care who you are. Fact is the competition, not just at the top of the conference, is why they would finish somewhere around 5th or 6th. Bama, Florida, and LSU would probably work them over pretty good but the middle of the SEC would split games with them if they played 4. Auburn, Ole Miss, Arkansas, Tennnessee, or South Carolina would give Tech fits. Ole Miss, South Carolina, and Tennessee all have the defensive firepower to stop Tech’s offense, not just the tope three. They do have a fairly tough schedule but North Carolina, Florida State, Wake Forest, Duke, Mississippi State, Vanderbilt, and Jacksonville State is not the equivalent of an SEC schedule. So they play 4 tough games and they are ready to run with the big boys? Remember, Tech left the SEC…..no sense in trying to argue your way back into the club. We prove year in and year out during bowl season how much better our league is than everyone else. Our 3,4,5 ranked teams will play other conference’s 1 or 2 ranked team and whip them more times than not during bowl season….that is only one game. Tech may be able to upset one of our top teams but they would muddle through the rest of the SEC schedule….try 7 tough games instead of 4.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
1:41 pm

Yes, Spurrier does wonders for rivalry games. He has always had a thing for us since we ruined his perfect season the year he won the Heisman. Which I find comical, because that only makes it sound like he expected us to rollover and die and not bother trying to win the game.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:41 pm

SEC Fan … yeah, we really saw that SEC dominance in that bowl game against WVU …

Saint Simons

November 11th, 2009
1:43 pm

33-17
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

TomB

November 11th, 2009
1:44 pm

SEC Fan: If what you say is true then all we can go by is head to head match ups.So If Tech beats UGA this year, they are 3-0 against the SEC.

Keep it Real!

November 11th, 2009
1:44 pm

Look when Mr. Johnson gets his type of players they would be able to do well in the SEC. The SEC is a very overrate football conference. Florida did not play any tough teams outside of the conference so we do not know how good they are.

Alabama will beat Florida this year in the SEC championship game!

That been said Mark Bradley using your premise of LSU beating Tech last year that means UTAH would be an elite team in the SEC because they beat Alabama in a bowl game last year.

winfield

November 11th, 2009
1:46 pm

Alabama whipped Virginia Tech? Really? Alabama trailed in the fourth quarter and needed a phantom holding call by SEC refs to change the momentum in their favor. Georgia Tech is a tought team to face when you only have one week to prepare for their offense. They would probably finish third in the SEC behind UF and Bama. LSU is one of the most overated teams in the most overated conference.

LSU

November 11th, 2009
1:46 pm

Suspiciously Eligible Conference

November 11th, 2009
1:46 pm

What will Georgie fans say when we beat them this year? It was a down year? We had bad coordinators? Well, we still won 7 in a row when you had Gailey? We just got worn down by our tough SEC schedule? Maybe you can cry about chop blocks like Frankenstein Beamer!

Keep it Real!

November 11th, 2009
1:47 pm

SEC fans are funny, I guess if you play Vandy,Kentucky,Miss St, UGA, Tenn, Arkansas, and Auburn you are playing a tough schedule. All those teams are not good period!

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
1:47 pm

Keep in mind too that when Miss State and Vandy were scheduled, both were making some pretty strong runs in the SEC. You can’t account for how a team is going to do in the future when you make out a schedule years in advance. Who knows, by 2011 Saban may be at Michigan or ND and Bama will be at the bottom of the conference. You can’t fault a team that schedules FBS schools. However, you can fault a team that traditionally buys games every year (e.g. UF, Bama, LSU).

BS Patrol

November 11th, 2009
1:48 pm

DawgFan,

List of teams you would most hate to lose to:

Ga
1) Ga Tech

Ga Tech
1) GA

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
1:48 pm

Sorry VT is higher than FSU because we don’t see FSU every year.

willie martinez

November 11th, 2009
1:48 pm

Enter your comments here

TomB

November 11th, 2009
1:48 pm

South Carolina is one of the better SEC teams this year so someone please explain to me how they narrowly escaped beating NC State this year by 7? NC State people. How did this happen?

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
1:50 pm

TomB, did I leave out the fact that Mississippi State and Vanderbilt do not qualify as tough games? You beat the two worst teams in our conference and UGA is down this year. So, your team would be 3-0 against the bottom 3rd of our conference….the rest of the SEC is too.

Tech82

November 11th, 2009
1:52 pm

Paul’s Johnson @ 11:50am writes: “Those ratings are the same for both QB’s for the 2009 season and yes Cox does have a higher rating than Nesbitt.”

A wise man once said, “Better to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and confirm it.” Do you research before you make a fool of yourself. Here are the undisputable facts: Josh Nesbitt’s passer rating so far this year is 144.8 while Joe Cox’s passer rating is 137.0. Now, please look at those numbers and explain to me how Cox’s QB rating is higher. Moron.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
1:54 pm

NCSY fumbled the ball on their own 7 or so yardline. USC scored and that was the gift of the game. USC played the big bad DAWGS better than they played NCSU.

gdawginkalamazoo

November 11th, 2009
1:54 pm

In a typical SEC year when the powers are up they would finish 4th in the East and Third in the West. 5th or 6th overall if playing a full on SEC schedule every year. Of course they will finish first in the ACC. And they would definitely beat Notre Dame.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
1:54 pm

The WVU game? You mean the one where they scored 28 points in the 1st qurater and barely a thing the rest of the game? Jumping on a lazy UGA team? You’re citing one game from 3 years ago? Gotta come with something better than that.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
1:55 pm

I suppose instead of SEC teams playing weak opponents they could play even weaker ones like Maryland (loses to I-AA opponent) or Virginia (loses to I-AA opponent) or that powerhouse called Weak Forest or the almighty formidable Duke…….what a joke the acc is….I could go on but that is like shooting fish in a barrel.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
1:56 pm

JacketFan, Mississippi State and Vanderbilt have both had one good season this decade. They are the doormats of our conference. Don’t use them as a measruing stick.

Richard

November 11th, 2009
1:57 pm

I believe you are correct in placing Tech 4th overall.I wish Tech had never opted out of the SEC back in “66.They went independent thinking they could get more $ and compete with the likes of Notre Dame
Big Deal-look at Notre Dame today(hope Johnson is smart enough not to go there)

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
2:00 pm

The way this year is going I am sure everybody wants to get UGA on their schedule and run from TECH.

Mark Richt, the jersey dick

November 11th, 2009
2:01 pm

I heard Richt is going on a new show called “Queer Eye for The Coachy Guy” to learn how to coordinate jerseys and helmets and pads and stuff for his football menses.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
2:02 pm

We would love to have Yech on our schedule. It seemed to work out quite well for us last year playing in ATL.

Justin

November 11th, 2009
2:02 pm

“Nobody else in the ACC has the speed to keep up with Dwyer and Nesbitt and Roddy Jones” No your wrong Clemson does other than that long 82 yard run by Allen in the thursday night game clemson contained the Triple Option. When they play in tampa clemson will destroy them.

ZebraGate break-in

November 11th, 2009
2:05 pm

If not for the suspended SEC officiating crew,
LSU would be 6-3
Florida would be 9-1
and
$aban would be unhappy………GO JACKETS…….

TomB

November 11th, 2009
2:06 pm

SEC Fan: You keep contradicting yourself. The SEC has teams that aren’t tough? UGA plays these teams, don’t they? LSU, ALA and Fl play these teams too, don’t they?

SC beats NC state by 7 and ALA has a hard time beating VT, and Clemson will probably beat SC. So the top of the SEC is good, but top to bottom they are not as good as you and others make them out to be. The telling story in those two Tech victories were the offensive stats that Tech racked up, and Vandy has a pretty good defense.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
2:06 pm

TomB, South Carolina is not one of the better teams in our conference this year, they are a middle of the pack team. They will have a great game and then have a bad one. NC State played them tough….but South Carolina won the game.

Ezekiel

November 11th, 2009
2:07 pm

Don’t see anything wrong with that analysis at all. Alabama and Florida are slam dunks and LSU manhandled Tech last year in the Fowl-Fil-A. But would like the opportunity to play any of those teams this year and settle it on the field. Talk more Tech football at: http://www.bbuzz.off.com

ZebraGate break-in correction

November 11th, 2009
2:08 pm

FLORIDA SHOULD BE 8-1

pee on a bee

November 11th, 2009
2:10 pm

does richt have to play tech this year..please he doesn’t want to..he’s actually lost to them once in his 8 years at Georgia, how embarrassing!

bug on a rug

November 11th, 2009
2:11 pm

georgia has no chance against the super bowl champion ga. tech yellow jackets..roflmao

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:11 pm

SEC has three competitive teams. One of which is NOT uga. UGA fans ride the coattails of better programs in their conference as an excuse for their poor showing this year. Of the three top-tier teams, UGA has played two of them. So, dawg fans, how do you account for the losses to the rest of the SEC teams on your schedule … oh, and that Oklahoma State team? I mean, they play in an inferior conference, right? No other conference should hold a candle to a team from the mighty SEC, right?

Give us a break, kids.

scared big time

November 11th, 2009
2:12 pm

i know the dawgs are scared of a team that is a whole 10 point favorite over the MIGHTY DUKE BLUE DEVILS, roflmao

Shula

November 11th, 2009
2:13 pm

Utah and Louisiana-Monroe would be above Bama
in the SEC West.

scared big time

November 11th, 2009
2:13 pm

yes we are riding on the coattails of 34 and 10 against tech over since 1965…roflmao

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:14 pm

Again, any UGA fan that would like to come by and see me at the Varsity on the 28th, feel free to drop by and have some ribs. We’ll be glad to have you over. Seriously. Good old fashioned hate or no, nothing beats football in the state of Georgia on the weekend after Thanksgiving.

DUKE.COM

November 11th, 2009
2:15 pm

That Duke QB is much better than scared big time JOE COX.

some Ga. tech sense here

November 11th, 2009
2:15 pm

be careful my yellow jacket colleagues, if we are upset by Georgia the crow eating could be unbearable!!!!!!

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:17 pm

Yeah, scared, thanks for reminding me. UGA fans also revel in the past as seen in their constantly referencing that national championship from 30 years ago. Funny. What have you done for me lately, baby. Today, Tech has the Governor’s cup. Until that changes, you guys are the biggest losers in the state.

scared big time

November 11th, 2009
2:17 pm

the varsity is awesome , used to go there before every hawks game back in the 70’s, believe it or not when the hawks home was the tech coliseum, and football is fun in Georgia, regardless of who wins, but go dawgs!!!

Devildog

November 11th, 2009
2:17 pm

Tech probably wouldn’t challenge for SEC titles because . . . gasp!!. . .
Jackets’ player REALLY have to go to class, study and pass tests.
You can tell that isn’t the case at Georgia by observing how many times an offensive lineman jumps offsides. He’s supposed to know the snap count, but HE can’t count!

willy want a cracker

November 11th, 2009
2:18 pm

The mighty Duke Blue Devils could beat Georgia

scared big time

November 11th, 2009
2:18 pm

true ..jacketfan…but Georgia will give ya’ll all you can handle of that i am sure.. good luck to ya

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:18 pm

Ga Tech Sense, give me a break. We’ve been eating crow for the past 3 decades. I don’t mind the taste of it so much as long as I get to serve it to my Dawg brethren now and again.

scared big time

November 11th, 2009
2:20 pm

ya’ll have a good one and remember its just game, not much in the eyes of eternity!!!!

TomB

November 11th, 2009
2:21 pm

SEC Fan: Tech played both of their SEC games on the road this year. You say Miss State and Vandy are not good so maybe compare how they played against the best in the SEC, Fl and LSU. Miss State lost in a tough game against LSU, 30-26, and lost 29-19 to FL, both respectable games, not blow outs.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
2:22 pm

I’m not contradicting anything. We had 3 teams in the National Title talk until 2 of those teams had to play each other. The ACC has had one team scratch and claw its way into the National Title picture (on the extreme outskirts of the picture) and the ACC is somehow on a closer level to the SEC? As in your top team finishing in fourth? So Tech loses to 2 of the 3 top teams (Bama, Florida, and LSU), splits with the middle of the pack teams (S. Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Auburn…not in that order), has a touch time and possibly loses to on of the bottom of the teams in the conference (just like you Jackets have said Vandy and Mississippi are up and coming SEC teams) and wins the rest of their non-conference games and that would put them 4th in our conference? Our conference is that good. You can’t argue with results and we’ve gotten results for ohhhh the past 100 years!!!! I know the arrogance is killing everyone but someone has to be the best.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
2:22 pm

I’m not contradicting anything. We had 3 teams in the National Title talk until 2 of those teams had to play each other. The ACC has had one team scratch and claw its way into the National Title picture (on the extreme outskirts of the picture) and the ACC is somehow on a closer level to the SEC? As in your top team finishing in fourth? So Tech loses to 2 of the 3 top teams (Bama, Florida, and LSU), splits with the middle of the pack teams (S. Carolina, Tennessee, Arkansas, Ole Miss, and Auburn…not in that order), has a touch time and possibly loses to on of the bottom of the teams in the conference (just like you Jackets have said Vandy and Mississippi are up and coming SEC teams) and wins the rest of their non-conference games and that would put them 4th in our conference? Our conference is that good. You can’t argue with results and we’ve gotten results for ohhhh the past 100 years!!!! I know the arrogance is killing everyone but someone has to be the best.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
2:24 pm

Huh???!!!! What is all this crap about talent? FL had talent when they had the Zooker. GA has talent and the have Richt.

GT has talent and they have a new Johnson. So… it really comes down to the Johnson…. doesn’t it?

kgb

November 11th, 2009
2:27 pm

GT would consistently beat one of those three, possibly 2 depending upon the time each team has before the game with GT. But, of course, you would have to take into account all the favorable calls that the big 3 in the SEC constantly get.

1eyedJack

November 11th, 2009
2:28 pm

If tech wishes to ever be truly relevant in college football they should relocate their campus to the suburbs and raze that dump in the middle of the ghetto.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:30 pm

So much of the perceived SEC dominance and rankings has to do with preseason polls. I say no polls until the BCS is released. That would certainly level the playing field.

SEC Fan

November 11th, 2009
2:32 pm

Favorable calls have gone for and against every team this year. As the players and coaches say the refs don’t put the ball in the end zone and can’t score points. I’ve seen bogus calls go against the 3 top ranked teams too. Everyone seems to be ignoring those. Tech would have nightmares about those 3 defenses. Don’t kid yourself, Bama and Florida are on a whole different level and you could throw LSU into that group too and Tech would get beat by all 3 teams 9 times out of ten….the latest beating happening last year in the Bowl game.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:32 pm

1eyedJack – I love having a campus in the middle of the city. As to the crime, I remember several instances of serial rapes happening in and around the UGA campus. Not to mention, Athens smells like a dirty, urine-soaked dog every time it rains there. No thanks.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
2:32 pm

Hey one eyed OFF, you mean like Southern Cal did?

Ah…. Athens in the summer, how intriguing!

Reck in e

November 11th, 2009
2:33 pm

You should ask how would Georgia fair in the ACC.

Dean George Griffin

November 11th, 2009
2:33 pm

We all like to write, and speculate. What is of ultimate importance, just now, is that Tech whip Duke, three days from now, and Georgia,
seventeen days from now. I believe both those victories will be ours, although I respect certain strengths that both those teams have.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
2:36 pm

SEC FAN The problem is that the POLS start too early. Tech was #15 then lost to what was thought to be a top 10 Miami. We got so far behind in the polls it was hard to come back. If Tech went down from 15 to say 18 than Tech would have been in the top 10 earlier and talked about more. The POLLS are a JOKE and so is the SEC/NCAA beauty contest called the National Championship. Every league play all your teams and have a Championship game and then the winners play for the CRYSTAL FOOTBALL. Leave dumba$$es like Tony BLOWHARD out of the picture.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
2:37 pm

JacketFan,

You’ve managed to lose a few screws here in the last several minutes. First off, UGA is 2-1 in BCS games. They have just as many BCS wins as the entire ACC combined. So you really have ZERO room to talk trash about UGA. And anyone with a lick of sense realizes UGA has a beautiful campus with the perfect downtown small town atmosphere to boot. Tech is stuck in the slums and ghetto of Atlanta where students are getting mugged on a weekly basis.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
2:38 pm

Tech would finish at least third or forth in either division of the SEC. They would lose to Bama and LSU in the west maybe even Arkansas this year since their D is not all that great. Florida, Tennessee, and maybe UGA and UK in the east. GT will beat Duke then lose on the 28th and lose on the 5th and wind up in the Gator or Chick-fil-a Bowl again. Write it down so you can say UKnowY told you so.

Reck in effect

November 11th, 2009
2:38 pm

The should really set up an ACC/SEC challenge held at the Georgia Dome and Carolina Panthers Stadium. You should have a total of 8-10 teams play on Friday,Saturday and Sunday. This would settle the whole dispute.

Tres Option

November 11th, 2009
2:40 pm

Georgia would be last in the ACC cause they suck vienna sausages. Eww, that sounds pretty grody!

gtphotographer

November 11th, 2009
2:40 pm

If Georgia Tech could concentrate cash and resources to being a Top 10 recruiter every year, then the tides could turn.

Comparing $EC to ACC is like comparing apples to oranges. Jan Kemp would agree with me on this–there is an academic expectation in being a student athlete at an ACC school.

Hell, even FSU had a potential med student on their team last year, and they’re the worst academic school in the conference! Vandy, you stand alone in the $EC.

http://www.usnews.com/articles/education/best-colleges/2009/03/03/college-rankings-by-athletic-conference.html

Center Sean Bedford (Aerospace Engineering) would have to agree. Football + AE has gotta suck.

jemmy

November 11th, 2009
2:41 pm

TomB,

You’re looking like a desperate inbred here. You’re trying to compare how teams do against other teams, as some method of measuring how good another particular team is? Grow up. Tech got their a$$es kicked by Miami, while Miami got the snot kicked out of them by Va Tech, and Tech beat Va. Tech. So yeah, your childish theory gets thrown out the window.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
2:41 pm

Dawg Fan….. I think that Athens smells like a dirty, uring soaked dog when it rains, and come to think of it…. even when it doesn’t.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
2:42 pm

Polls start to early????? You’re ranked seventh in the nation, if you look at those ranked one through six you will see one glaring difference between them and GT. Here’s a hint, look at the column with the L over it and you may figure it out.

Webster

November 11th, 2009
2:43 pm

I like reck in effect’s idea, an all weekend ACC/SEC challenge would settle this whole SEC is better than ACC, oh the ACC has no talent and doesnt compete with the SEC. The Big 12 would kick the SEC’s but so whats ur pizzoint?

Robert

November 11th, 2009
2:43 pm

The bottom line is the essence of the charm of college football is the unpredictability of it. Tenn almost beat Bama for chrissakes!! Georgia can certainly come into Atlanta and beat tech but by the same token tech could rout georgia. no way of knowing until we actually see the game. Tech could beat any SEC team on any given saturday and vice versa. The radically partisan comments from tech and uga people are ridiculous mouth breathing sentiments. Bradley is probably spot on in his analysis.

Nawls

November 11th, 2009
2:44 pm

Reck,

That would be awesome, but you know it would never work out. Odds are, the best ACC and SEC teams from the previous year would be down the following year when the challenge would be taking place. The only real way to do it would be at the end of the season, but that would never happen.

In every bowl game last year, the SEC team was the lower seeded team out of their conference as compared to their opponent, and they still managed to go 6-2 in a very down year. Pretty cool.

michelle

November 11th, 2009
2:45 pm

Personally, as a Tech girl I love having to run and hide from all the homeless, rapists and drug dealers as I walk to and from class everyday. I feel as though I’m very fortunate to get so cultured.

What about Bob?

November 11th, 2009
2:46 pm

Last time I went to Athens it was like walking into the stadium mens room, smelled and looked like someone wee wee’ed all over the place and there were trash everywhere and frat boys who needed a haircut and an attitude adjustment!!!!

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
2:46 pm

UKY yourself in the shower too? No POLL is worth a crap before the 5th week of the season. If the Gators didn’t start at #1 they would not be ther now with the weak games they have played.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
2:47 pm

Isn’t U KY a member of the SEC?

Nawlens, Looosiana

November 11th, 2009
2:48 pm

This news just in: SEC is overrated…………………. Get over urselfs!

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
2:48 pm

Dave if one of the best college towns in America smells like this to you I’m wondering what a cesspool like the ATL is like, in your opinion.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
2:48 pm

Time will tell when the bowls roll around……and just like every other year the SEC will dominate once again. The mighty nerds were slain 38-3, the big bad Texas Tech Red Raiders go down to a “lesser” Ole Miss team 47-34. The overrated every season Sooners lose to Florida 24-14…. and the Tide well they did not do too well. Care to trot out the statistics for the acc in the bowls? That should be a hoot…….

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:49 pm

DawgFan – You’re talking to someone who lived in Athens for three years, friend. UGA does have a lovely campus, but Athens-Clark County is not some safe, insulated haven from crime. The major difference between the two locations is the rate of unforced segregation in regard to income level. In other words, all of the poor folks live in the outskirts (northside) of Athens, with the campus in a cushy bubble of higher-income and student housing. You can’t do that in the city. However, UGA still has a high rate of on-campus violent crime, including rape and armed robbery. Not to mention, all of those moronic drunk frat boys speeding up and down Milledge Ave in their raised trucks.

Tres Option

November 11th, 2009
2:50 pm

Yeah good queshun Dave, UK is the most boring SEC team to watch play football! I would rather watch paint dry or glue dry or something. Uhh, huh huh….

ACC = Bowl losses

November 11th, 2009
2:50 pm

The ACC is great for making money off of. If you can find anyone dumb enough to take a ACC team as a winner in a bowl game, just beat on their opponent and you win!!! It’s like stealing candy from a baby!!!

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
2:51 pm

The Gators may not be ranked #1 but they would still be ranked higher then the nerds!!! Lose column UF 0; GT 1!!!

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
2:51 pm

Loss column*

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
2:51 pm

Atlanta the place that Makes the State of Georgia work? It smells like a Big City that has problems yes, but it does generate MONEY. How many students at UGA get money from the Lottery to attend Lawn/Landscape class?

Gator Fan

November 11th, 2009
2:53 pm

Look at UGA fans counting a win against little Hawaii as a BCS victory!
WOW UGA beat up little Hawaii!

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
2:53 pm

Ahh… the ATL has the sweet smell of International Competition, (aka Olympics), plus the aroma of good paying JOBS (not a concern in Athens), not to mention The Cheetah and Alluvia.

You said it yourself…… Athens- a college town. Nothing more.

And it still smells like a dirty, urine soaked dog.

Webster

November 11th, 2009
2:54 pm

We all know half dem lil frat boy sissys in Athens havent seen or better yet even been close to a ghetto in they lives, they really is in a bubble. Reality check, college doesnt last forever sissy boys!

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
2:54 pm

Who are the idiots posting the Big 12 would dominate the SEC? Look at last years results in the BCS and then revise your statement. It’s all fun and games until reality strikes……..

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
2:54 pm

No answer? I will tell you that the Lottery players from what is called Metro Atlanta sends kids to UGA more than the Lotto players form Athens-Clarke County. Athens-Clarke County people to pay taxes to house UGA players every so often though.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
2:55 pm

Athens-Clarke County Crime Stats:

Murder: 1.13 times the national average
Forcible Rape: 1.37 times the national average

Yeah – pleasant

Urban Myer

November 11th, 2009
2:55 pm

Les, either way you suck!

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
2:56 pm

Yeah Atlanta that makes the state operate that’s why the state was so eager to help out the city with all their recent monetary needs. And no not a UK Wildcat here, actually got the name from one of my favorite movies.

Shirley Franklin

November 11th, 2009
2:56 pm

Atlanta the place to make money………Ok and then the green cards expire for all the tech graduates. The only ones left are those bottom feeders witht the mgt degree.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
2:57 pm

I too lived in Athens and was one of the “moronic drunk fat boys” you refer to. If not for all the schools (not just UGA) the “forced segregated income” people would more than likely not have any jobs. Without UGA, Athens wouldn’t even show on the map. While I was at UGA there was a horrible string of rapes that occurred. Eventually they caught the perv, and shockingly enough he lived in the projects right across the street from the freshman dorms. But there is no comparison in which campus is more safe. UGA wins that debate in a landslide. And I rather have drunk coeds to deal with over random terrorists building bombs on campus.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
2:59 pm

Thank you, Urban. Whatcha doing tonight?

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:00 pm

Shirley keep running the Black money making machine. How much do you owe the JACKSON and KING kids now?

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:00 pm

Amen DawgFan!!!

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
3:00 pm

LOL!!!! I meant F-R-A-T boy, LOL, not fat!!!! Hilarious though!!! The fat boy would be appropiate nowadays, sadly!!

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:01 pm

I do have to agree with onadawg about shirley girl.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:01 pm

Hey Dawg Fan, were you relieved when they caught the rapist?

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:02 pm

At least TECH bomber are smart enough to build a bomb. At UGA you can’t even find a student to make a STIL to make a drink. I give you that the Lawn guys can grow som good smoke and shrooms.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:05 pm

On a slow day this is always fun to JAB eachother on the Blogs. You do have to agree it is fun.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:06 pm

Who will make comment 700?

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:07 pm

ME ME ME please let it be ME.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:07 pm

Could not agree more, can’t imagine a better way to spend a rainy afternoon.

swBUZZman

November 11th, 2009
3:08 pm

Mark,

You said that Tech would be the team that no-one, including Florida, Bama, etc, would not want to play. If that is the case, then why do you concede they would be behind them in the SEC. And I know the answer to this already, but wasnt GT in the SEC at one time, and didnt they win it several times? And with CPJ, why would that be any different.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:08 pm

I still don’t know if Dawg Fan (aka fat boy) was relieved!!!!

gdawginkalamazoo

November 11th, 2009
3:11 pm

Oh come on people, time for a new blog Bradley it has sunk to degrading the town the schools are located in. Athens is a beautiful college town. GT is located in one the great cities in the country. Crime happens every where. Stop insulting each others campuses. Geez. For their respective courses of study the state of Georgia is blessed to have two fine institutes of learning. And for football players don’t start on that either. We both have players to be proud of and then the ones working towards those NFL’s not Phd’s.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:11 pm

I am watching the Tech VT game from DVR and blogging. Wow if Only I could make money doing this like Mark, Jeff, and Tony life would be GREAT. HAHAHAHA.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:12 pm

Yeah the nerds were in the SEC over 30 years ago!!! That should count for something.

Trade School Junkie

November 11th, 2009
3:12 pm

Bradley:

The better question is:

How each conference or each team would perform if there
was a LEGIT D-1 playoff system??

B = Beauty
C = Contest
S = System

B = Bowl
C = Cartel
S = System

G-Man

November 11th, 2009
3:12 pm

Tech is better than LSU, right behind Bama and UF (with UF being the best, mainly due to Tebo and that defense). MacElroy (sp?) is suspect also. But if we fix our problems on defense in the coming years I think we hang with anybody, including the elite in the SEC. Remember, we’re still on the way up, so just being in this conversation in Johnson’s second year is huge (just ask the UGA homers). Go Jackets.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:13 pm

gdawg go back to michigan and let us worry about the south.

LVJacket

November 11th, 2009
3:14 pm

The issue with the Jackets is not the offense……its the D…..or lack thereof. Once the D improves, Tech will be able to regularly compete for titles with the likes of Florida, Alabama, Texas, OU and USC.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:15 pm

I’m impressed, a G Dawg in Kalamazoo?

I agree with everything you say….. except the part about Athens.

Can’t wait to go there next year for win number 3 !!!

As for the SEC, let’s see where they end up in the BCS final standings.

BTW, I heard that the Big East was looking for a new member – one from a town called Athens! Good Luck Dawggies.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:15 pm

LVJ, if it’s and but’s were candy and nuts we would all have a merry christmas.

GeorgiaGirl

November 11th, 2009
3:16 pm

Pi$$onaDawg: First of all, your name is just fowl and shows the complete lack of social skills of the Techies.
Secondly, all I’ve ever seen run away from Tech are female co-eds.
And by reading this post, it is apparant that I (a girl, no less) know more about football than the Tech-tried-and-true ever will.
What quarterback do y’all hope to acquire in the future when he knows he’ll be running the option EVERY play?

You honestly think you could beat Florida??? Enjoy the delusion.

Techie Tedly

November 11th, 2009
3:18 pm

I disagree about LSU. GT would probably finish behind Florida and Bama in a 12-game season, but I think we are better than LSU this year. The way to beat PJ’s option is to overpower the blockers and get penetration into the backfield, while remaining disciplined on the defensive assignments. It’s not easy to do for a whole game, but that’s how Miami this year and UNC last year made us look like a high school offense with no quarterback. Every time Nesbitt took the snap, there were guys crashing through the line taking away all three of his options. Florida’s defense could do that for sure, and Bama could too if they had time to prepare. LSU would not be able to outscore us, unless we gave away the game with turnovers and special teams screwups, and over the course of a season we could finish a game or two better.

We have the talent and the speed on offense, what we would need to win the SEC over all is a faster defensive secondary. Jeff Demps at Florida may the only tailback in the SEC faster than Dwyer, Roddy, Allen, and thomas.

For head to head matchups, I think it depends what time of the season the game is played. PJ’s teams get better every game, and the past two years we have looked sloppy to start the season before we tighten up, quit turning the ball over and finish strong. As long as our offensive stars stay healthy, I would not want to face us in the latter third of the season, no matter how many points you think you can score on our defense.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:18 pm

Dave UGA is not dumb enough to make the same mistake you nerds did in leaving the SEC!!! Pocket protectors for everyone.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:21 pm

Hey Georgia Girl, I think I remember you walking up the stairs at the GT student center. I was (looking up).

BTW, I think you mean foul…. not fowl. Google that and you will remember next time. You should watch the O’Reilly factor word of the day. Well… maybe not!

Let’s meet in back of the blog after UGA gets whacked in ATL (during the game). And be careful going up those stairs.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:23 pm

Ga Girl you don’t like my NAME? Wow I made that name just to make UGA fans LOVE ME. I am Sorry it didn’t work. My Social Skills work well to run my business and I do businees with many UGA fans. My best friend is a BAMA boy and I told him I would pull the sofa spring his ass sucked up during the LSU game if he would do the same for me after the Wake game. HAHAHA. It is all good.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:23 pm

Dave must be tired of his little asian gt grad.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
3:26 pm

U do KY don’t go that ASIAN thing my 2 sisters are Korean and Great women. 1 is finishing her Doctorate and the other has 3 Kids(1 UGA fan, 1 GT fan, and a Baby) so this is a Grand parent House Divided.

Dave's Little Asian GT Grad

November 11th, 2009
3:28 pm

UKnowY:

“Dave must be tired of his little asian gt grad.”

That is not true! Dave’s not tired of me at all and I’m not “some little asian grad”, I do have a name….it’s Bob.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:29 pm

Hey, U KY !!!! What makes you think UGA could get into the Big East?

For the record. GT wins out, finishes higher that any SEC team except FL.

UGA lucky to get to the toilet Bowl.

And…. it’s the asian grad who really wants the GA girl.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:29 pm

what happened to “this is so much fun, and it’s great to poke fun at each other?”

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:35 pm

Dave I think it’s hilarious that GT has one win over an in state opponent every eight years and can’t then has a decent season after that and now the nerd fans are talking trash like they are freaking Florida or USC. Yes you finally made a great hire on a head coach and yes you have had a great season to this point and you still haven’t won anything since 1998.

Dave's Little Asian GT Grad (Bob)

November 11th, 2009
3:35 pm

Dave from GT:

“And…. it’s the asian grad who really wants the GA girl.’

You know that’s not true Dave, I only have eyes(and butt) for you!

If you behave the rest of the afternoon, I will model your thong for you when you get home from class.

Smooches!!

Pat

November 11th, 2009
3:37 pm

Go poke yourself.

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:41 pm

This is more fun that College Footbal GameDay with Herbstreit and Corso.

I do agree with U KY…… GT has THE JOHNSON.

Gotta go hang out under the stairs now!

So you guys have a nice day, and BOB, watch yourself if you ever get down to 10th and Peachtree.

GT Rolls !!!! The next decade belongs to the Jackets!!!

The ACC is on the rise, the SEC is going down ! Just get used to it.

It’s all in the Johnson.

Bye

Stinger

November 11th, 2009
3:42 pm

Tech would be a strong 2nd. Tech can beat Florida and Alabama, but for the entire season, would probably finish 2nd to Florida this year. Next year is a different story. # 1 jackets for 2010.

Florida # 1
Tech # 2
Bama # 3
Miami # 4
Clemson # 5
LSU # 6
Virginia Tech # 7
Arkansas #8
Boston College # 9
Ole Miss # 10
UGA # 16

gdawginkalamazoo

November 11th, 2009
3:43 pm

UknowY, I am in Michigan. Why are you worried about the south? I’m not. I grew up there, I have friends and family there and I frequently vacation there. So?

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:43 pm

PJ, I had the honor of meeting him once and would suggest this to anyone who may have the pleasure of his presence one day make sure to ask him to tell you the Timbuktu story.

Otto

November 11th, 2009
3:45 pm

It all make me laugh when a GT fan picks a name and in place of something that displays pride in GT they display pride in hating their rival.

It is drilled into the GT culture just listen to “whats the good word?” or the lyrics sung loudest during the fight song. THWG. Even old gold is ditched UGA history.

If your cross state rival does not hat chance are you are doing something wrong. UGA doesn’t hate GT, they’re just an annoying neighbor thus much fewer UGA fans with screennames such as Bugkiller and more with Dawg in them. It is great to be part of something that you can be proud of and define on your own.

Otto

November 11th, 2009
3:46 pm

*not hate you, chances

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:46 pm

Well gdawg it looks like trying to get your yankee a$$ riled up worked!

Dave from GT

November 11th, 2009
3:47 pm

This really is my last entry, but Otto, you sound like you are on crack.

Marlin Fisher

November 11th, 2009
3:48 pm

Seems to me like a pretty unfounded argument. Best evidence provided by the performances of previous years? Thats like using UF’s bowl loss to Michigan 2 years ago as a reason to ignore them now. Truth of the matter is there is no way to determine where the SEC stands nationally cause they haven’t played or beaten any real contenders outside of it (best game being a victory over a 6-3 #21 VT). You fail to mention that VT has the 4th ranked offense in the ACC and put up more points on BAMA then any (SEC included) opponent. You also downplay the direct correlation regarding GT’s greater margins of victory over Florida’s opponents. (That would seem to me to be of more importance than how bama did against clemson last year who turned out to be a 6 loss team.) You also fail to realize that this year, GT faces Clemson in ACCCG, will be beaten and thus are actually second in ACC.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:48 pm

Dangit hades must be freezing over cause I’m agreeing with GT Dave again.

gdawginkalamazoo

November 11th, 2009
3:52 pm

UKnowY, I never get “riled” up and my a$$ is still southern, thanks for asking. Have a nice life.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:53 pm

You do the same yankee

BG

November 11th, 2009
3:53 pm

Last. Tech sucks

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:55 pm

2nd that yech does suck!

Bobby

November 11th, 2009
3:55 pm

Enter your comments here

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
3:55 pm

If the Jackets were in the SEC, we would have to become an institution of lower learning, so we could recruit Ghetto Thugs that can play football. We would have to offer “Food Science”, “Poultry Science”, and “Livestock Management”.

Tech

November 11th, 2009
3:56 pm

Bobby Dodd

November 11th, 2009
3:56 pm

Better beat Duke before we start telling the world how good we are! Just saying…

Buckheadbill

November 11th, 2009
3:56 pm

Reggie Ball took 2 years of advanced Kal Q Lus?

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
3:57 pm

later nerd fans have to go back to scrubbing toilets now, i only graduated from an sec school

Regent

November 11th, 2009
3:58 pm

Jacketnation, you now must offer how to be an ass 101. I am sure you aced that required course..

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:00 pm

sorry but what was joe hamiltons major something to do with weighing ounces? oh and what about stephon marbury, what was his gpa again?

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:00 pm

Reggie was fine in the class room, just an idiot on the field. And Gailey was too hard headed to put him in the secondary, like the other schools (including UGA) wanted to do.

Mark Richt, the jersey dick

November 11th, 2009
4:00 pm

Georgia Girl – are you the one that looks just like Rennie Curran?

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:01 pm

how could i forget mr. ball, what down is it again?

DawgNation

November 11th, 2009
4:02 pm

JackNation,

Stephon Marbury, Keith Brooking, Reggie Ball, Michael Johnson, Josh Nesbitt and countless others of your dredlocked hoodrats would probably disagree with you. Tech just does fine finding thugs in their pipeline high schools in the ghettos of Atlanta.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:03 pm

betcha he never forgot anything for a test.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:03 pm

Couldn’t have stated that any nicer DawgNation

Jeff

November 11th, 2009
4:04 pm

The Trade School is the only engineering institute with a Humanities school

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:05 pm

they have to get the athletes in somehow.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
4:05 pm

and Nesbitt will teach the class on thermal management this semester…..LMAO. Dwyer can’t even spell his name but we are to believe that all these players are the next Steven Hawking……give it a rest techies…..your football players are not rocket scientist.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:07 pm

with the percentage of foreign born students enrolled at g yeck i’m surprised they don’t have more in the athletic department.

Q-tip

November 11th, 2009
4:07 pm

Tech doesn’t have to worry with who they recruit. Because their star athletes all magically make passing grades, until they get busted for cheating like they did for 6 years during 1997-2003. Only to throw a poor hourly paid office clerk under the bus for their cheating ways. Pathetic.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
4:08 pm

DAWG NATION Dreglocked players? I think UGA has a few and the Athens-Clarke County Jail knows them by name and finger print.

I love hairy arab chicks

November 11th, 2009
4:08 pm

Hey, stop talking about my school you UGA hillbillies!!! At least our athletes can tie their own shoes and point to what they want to eat at McDonalds!!!

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:10 pm

i think UGA has two starters with dreads but you can clearly see the name on their uniform. i still haven’t caught the running backs name for yeck who transfered from louisville.

DawgNation

November 11th, 2009
4:10 pm

Yep. Ours get busted for ridiculous driving infractions while yours get popped for raping women and slinging rock.

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:11 pm

They only offer Jackass 101 in Athens. It is part of the prestigious 4 year live stock management school. My grandfather had a third grade education and he was a great livestock and farm manager on his 144 acres. We are proud of our student athletes. One of our offensive lineman is majoring in aeronautical engineering. Three Tech grads flew the space shuttle (same crew) last fall. UGA has made major accomplishments with student athletes as well. Developing microwavable hamburger helper is something the Bulldawg nation can be proud of.

Georgia Tech 9 – 1 and # 7 in the BCS

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:11 pm

i was wondering if mcdonalds still had the picture menu

Joey Hamilton

November 11th, 2009
4:12 pm

y0!!!! WeZ alL bEe sMaRt n’ ClaSsY aT dA UnIvErSiTiE uH Ge0rGiA tEk!!!!

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
4:12 pm

I will ask this again. How can you UGA fans love the AA football players on Saturday and hate them when they date your FAKE Blonde Barbie Tri Delta Daughter on Monday? UGA the Ole Miss of the EAST COAST.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:14 pm

wow they have microwavable hamburger helper now? were those three tech grads that flew the space shuttle the ones starring in that movie space chimps?

VOLS

November 11th, 2009
4:15 pm

TN Vols can beat Tech on any given Saturday !!

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:16 pm

oooh oooh aaah aaah

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
4:17 pm

KY on Yourself. His name is ALLEN and all you need to see is what the Dawgs will see his hair in the breeze as he runs for anothe GEORGIA TECH TOUCH DOWN.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:17 pm

when did anyone get angry for their daughter dating an nfl prospect?

BobbyGodd

November 11th, 2009
4:18 pm

Hate to say it…but you are probably right Mark! Tech would likely be better than all three of the SEC teams you mention if only the defense performed like many of us expected back in August. We lost three DL’s but returned the remainder. This has been a very disappointing team defensively since the first game against Jax St. and has certainly not improved much. Had Skinner decided to throw short routes for first downs rather than the deep ball – GT probably loses the game to Wake. We made Vandy look very potent on offense and GT is likely the only team capable of that infamous act. But thankfully, coaching and second half offensive play has been terrific.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:20 pm

oh i just figured he grew his hair that long because he was embarrassed that his name was misspelled on his jersey.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
4:21 pm

DUH when he beatr her and was f….g everything that walked ie McNair. GREAT guy but a bnurning in Hell POS for sure.

Marlin Fisher

November 11th, 2009
4:21 pm

SEC has NO case
All they have managed to prove is their own standings (in the midst of a ton of suspect officiating). To which, I reply, “We already knew that” Being undefeated is not impressive when your suppose to be better than your inner conference opponents and your national challenges include FIU, Troy, Charleston Southern, etc. Take a look at the SEC vs ranked opponents this year. They’re 1-3 (Ok State, VT, GT x2) For comparison sake the ACC is 3-3 (TCU x2, BYU, USF, Stan, Pitt). And might I add thats considering teams that are still ranked, not just teams with great expectations

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:21 pm

i think vols is right, at least until papa kiffin leaves poppy cock.

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:21 pm

I am sure you trailer park dwellers so the widely publicized report last fall that; Georgia Tech athletes ranked #1 in the nation in highest SAT scores; above Notre Dame and even the IVY league schools. Florida was near the bottom but ranked the #1 party school (underaged drinking) with UGA posting #3. UGA does a lot of “posting”. Posting bail at the Athens Clark County Jail. They should add a full time bail bondsman to the athletic staff.

DawgFan 4 Life

November 11th, 2009
4:22 pm

According to saragin: http://www.usatoday.com/sports/sagarin/fbc09.htm

Virginia Tech, Georgia Tech, and Clemson would finish 3rd, 4th and 5th in the SEC (then LSU at 6th) then Miami at 7th. The ACC would capture 4 of the top 7 teams in the SEC (which is what should be expected)… UGA would be 7th between all teams in the ACC.

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
4:24 pm

Dave from GT,

Was I relieved when they caught the rapist? Only a nasty, cold-hearted, miserable Yech fan would make light of a rapist that ruined the lives of numerous women. I’d love to see you in person sometime, Dave.

UKnowY

November 11th, 2009
4:26 pm

yes true 1-3 but who did yeck beat from the SEC??? both last place teams and who else did the acc play two mountain west teams, two big east teams, and a pac 10er. none of those teams would have finished in the top eight in the SEC. just like yeck wouldn’t have

Reginald Dwight

November 11th, 2009
4:26 pm

You’re exactly right. The Jackets are awesome and great fun to watch. They would fall into place just about where you said (provided the SEC head ofc instructs the refs to allow it). Good call sir.

Old Gold '71

November 11th, 2009
4:28 pm

Mark, as a Tech alum and season ticket holder… I think you’re pretty close to being correct. I’d rank Tech second in the SEC East, and second in the SEC West this year, third overall. You hit the nail on the head – the Jackets’ defense is up to where it would need to be to finish higher, and that’s also why talk of playing in the BCSCG is premature. A great team, but not a complete team – yet. Give Paul Johnson a little more time and I think they will be.

umpers

November 11th, 2009
4:28 pm

Marlin,

Yeah douche. Hang your hat on Yech playing and beating the mighty Miss. State and Vandy types. Top to bottom, year and year out, the SEC owns the ACC. Richt is 11-1 against them. Nuff said.

Diehard Tech Fan

November 11th, 2009
4:29 pm

Mark,

I strongly disagree. Tech has proven to be the best team in the nation this year. Heads and shoulders above anything the SEC has produced. Out of the 32 NFL teams, I’d wager to say that Tech would easily beat 28 of them on any given day.

Old Gold '71

November 11th, 2009
4:30 pm

NOTE: My bad – meant to say that the defense is NOT up to whee it would need to be to finish higher -

I love manboobs

November 11th, 2009
4:30 pm

PLEASE HELP!!! PLEASE!!! DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY SHIRTLESS PICTURES OF PAUL JOHNSON? WE CAN ARRANGE SOMETHING FOR A TRADE. THANKS!!!!

Diehard Tech Fan

November 11th, 2009
4:31 pm

Old Gold,

You are selling my Jackets waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too short. We would clearly dominate the SEC, along with most professional conferences.

Rave from GT

November 11th, 2009
4:34 pm

DawgFan has manboobs

Dr. J

November 11th, 2009
4:38 pm

The ACC gets to play cupcakes without going out of conference…..I’ve known many Tech players over the past 30 years—believe me, they didn’t take calculus.

Wooglin

November 11th, 2009
4:45 pm

Excellent analysis. Tech’s offense is as good as anybody’s but until we get better than an Ivy League defense, we are never going to ascend to the elite. I am not sure we can consistently recruit the big hogs necessary for a great defense, year in and year out.

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:45 pm

UGA academic requirements for athletes is limited to being able to write your name; with a crayon.

DCDawg

November 11th, 2009
4:49 pm

Just about everything has been said and overkilled already on this blog. But what I amazing to me is that you never hear any of you windshield splatters talking two years ago, hell, 8 years ago. You little bugs have now all appeared and talking trash as though you have some amazing tradition of football. Last year was decent for you, not amazing. You beat UGA. Ruined my weekend, not gonna lie, but you still lose to cupcakes. I am as disappointed in my Dawgs this year as anyboy else, but UGA will beat Tech this year. No doubt.

Red & Black Forever.

jacketnation

November 11th, 2009
4:54 pm

Maybe we need a new DC? We definitely need two interior DL and another Derrick Morgan at the other end. We have some players that might develop. T.J. Barnes is a giant, but doesn’t make many big plays. How many tackles has Logan Walls made? Any sacks? Jason Peters? We need three stud LB’s Griffin does a good job as does the Gladiator. But we give up way too much on the ground and don’t put enough pressure on the QB. Until our Defense matches our Offense in terms of skill level, we are not going to be the best team in the country. If we get into a game in which we can’t run the ball, we are in trouble. I love Nesbitt, but he has got to come around with the passing game. I also wish they would throw the ball to Steven Hill in addition to Thomas.

That’s my thoughts. We’ll still beat UGA like a red headed step child.

CHOP BLOCK U

November 11th, 2009
5:01 pm

Once Johnson’s dirtya$$ offense finally seriously injuries an opposing player, and it most certainly will, the NCAA will be forced to do the right thing and outlaw this barbaric tactic. Once Johnson is unable to cheat anymore he’ll have to devise an entirely new offense, since without chop blocks, as we all know, this offense can’t move an inch.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
5:03 pm

Urm, Dawgfan, I was certainly running my mouth eight years ago and especially in the Ball/Johnson years when Tech had a few glowing moments in which we came close to ending the UGAg streak. Every team has its fairweather fans, and Tech fans are, by nature, far more subdued, but don’t lump us all together. I’m no bandwagoner (even when it comes to the Braves – I can remember paying one stinking dollar to watch Dale Murphy and Bob Horner in those awful baby blues). We love our team and we will beat our chest loud and proud … especially when we’re on a tear.

Go Jackets!

To Hell With Georgia!

TOptionSpread

November 11th, 2009
5:03 pm

2008 the ACC took 6 out of 10 in regular season last year and are 2 and 2 this year, with 3 to go and probably win 2 out of 3 of those.
Go Jackets !!! THWG

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
5:03 pm

Ooops. Sorry DawgFan – that was meant for DCDawg.

ReGgIe BaLlA!!!

November 11th, 2009
5:03 pm

TeK wUz HaRd, mAn!!! AlL d0sE cLasSeS tHeY MaDe mEe tAkE aT GOrGiA StAtE aNd AtLAnTa UnIvErSiTiE wUz tUfF!!!!

DawgFan

November 11th, 2009
5:06 pm

Not a problem TechFan, sine I concure with DCDawg completely. Seriously, I’ve never seen as many brand new, shiny GT tags, decals and flags in my life!!! As Kincade from 680 The Fan says before any Tech updates, “on to the bandwagon!!!”

Justin

November 11th, 2009
5:08 pm

Tech Fans – congrats on a great season. Your program is going in the right direction for sure. Just don’t get ahead of yourselves. This doesn’t mean you are going to start competing for National Titles year-in and year-out as one fan suggsted. It doesn’t take much for a team to go from the TOP to the middle of the road – Just ask UGA, Oklahoma, FSU, Miami, Ohio St, etc. With most of those schools, nothing has really changed – a few injuries, a few “misses” on recruits, a few bad breaks can really change a program. You are a LONG, LONG way from being a top 10 national program every year.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
5:10 pm

Yeah, Reggie, we remember those tough academic standards at UGA

http://sports.espn.go.com/ncaa/news/story?id=3756812

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
5:12 pm

Well, DawgFan, I certainly remember some folks leaving the UGA bandwagon during the Goff/
Donnan years. I never saw such a miserable group of fans in my life.

Scott

November 11th, 2009
5:12 pm

Considering we have outscored vandy and miss st more than fla lsu and bama will, and will beat uga as worse, i’d say gt is at the top. the sec is overrated this year. the refs have kept bama and fla undefeated for money. they are not as good as the media portrays. you’ll see in the bowl games.

1990_Champs_GT

November 11th, 2009
5:12 pm

I’ve been hoping for the Jackets to get back into the SEC since the early 90’s; even if it meant playing the Gators each year. I thought bringing in Miami, VT and Boston College would improve the ACC in football… Hasn’t yet and it may not ever happen.

Let’s face facts: The winner of the SEC championship game gets an automatic spot in the BCS championship game most years. Why wouldn’t you want to be in a conference like that?!

I say the ACC “trades” GT straight up to the SEC for Kentucky. That way the ACC can have another basketball school; it’s all they care about anyway.

Paul in RDU

November 11th, 2009
5:16 pm

I think Mark has it about right – UF and ALA at the top then LSU or Tech.

And to my fellow Yellow Jackets who want to say that the SEC isn’t better than the ACC right now – you’re nuts.
Although the ACC may be up there at the top in FB at times the ACC is never going to be consistently better than the SEC in FB. The SEC has 11 large state schools and 1 private school. The ACC has 4 private schools – including the smallest school in the FBS – and an engineering school with a limited curriculum.

FB is much more important to the SEC schools (and their fans) on balance than to the ACC schools. They will spend whatever it takes to have better coaches, bigger stadia, etc.

Up here in the Triangle the fans take their football seriously but B’Ball is what they really get fired up about.

AMG

November 11th, 2009
5:18 pm

Here is my take. Florida has looked less than great this year and they have faced one team all year, LSU. I think Tech and at least 5 other teams can beat Florida this year. If Alabama wins the SEC showdown with Florida, what are the odds of GT facing them in a bowl game? I relish the opportunity. I can not think of a better opponent than the loser of Alabama vs Florida. It would shut alot of SEC people up if Tech won and would shut the ACC up if Tech lost. Please let the BCS do this thing right and not have the loser of the SEC play SW eastern girls school of champions that once beat a boys team and is undefeated in the their league of two teams. A much more meaningful game is due. I read that Florida might play ND in a bowl game. Please, are you serious. What the ***** is that. ND is a has been team and program that is still holding on to memories of 15 years ago. Lets settle this SEC ACC thing on the field.

Dr. J

November 11th, 2009
5:19 pm

Boy, you must be excited about Duke, after Weak Forrest. What a schedule. Played or beaten anyone in the top 20?

turd hater

November 11th, 2009
5:22 pm

I seriously think Gt looking that they have played no body this year except for miami and a overated virginia tech, they struggled against the winless vanderbilt and Mississippi state. they would be behind;
1 Fla
2 Ala
3 LSu
4 UGa
5 Auburn
6 Tenn
7 south Carolina
8 Gt.
Gt has no defense and they havent played anyone with speed except miami and you know what happened there. GT is so overated, wait till duke beats them this weekend, and they face a struggling UGA team that will beat them by 3 TD.

wes

November 11th, 2009
5:24 pm

“there’s still a difference between the personnel of a top-shelf SEC team and of everyone else.”

Then explain why more ACC players have been taken in the NFL draft over the past 4-5 years than the SEC has?

The SEC is better because it has more money to spend on coaching and facilities.

#1 GT fan

November 11th, 2009
5:25 pm

People who wrote comments: If this there is one thing I dont like about the conferences it is this right here. The SEC, THIS YEAR, is better then the ACC.
BUT the teams are not called the sec team or the acc team. Individual teams make up these conferences. Every conference has there good teams as well as there bad teams.

Mark: I agree 100% with every thing you said.

Except this. For all we know, the ” #1 team ” ( Uf this year ) could lose every game next year. And so could Alabama and GT. No one knows.

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
5:30 pm

I just red thatd beez TEZ witd az da 9 win YEAR sowz faR can I bile outs my son to goez to Teck? CMR wantz my sonr to be GOD and notz learn hoz to read.

Otto

November 11th, 2009
5:38 pm

Shouldn’t that be howz?

Hoz is what a GT student goes see at the Cheetah when they want to see what a female looks like.

Let the facts speak for themselves

November 11th, 2009
5:48 pm

Here are the facts for all those who wish to bring up last year’s Peach Bowl:

Total Yards: LSU – 324, GT – 314
Turnovers: LSU – 0, GT – 3
Of course, if you wish to add the onside kick and all turnovers on downs (which are essentially turnovers), LSU – 1, GT – 8

So, down 7 in the turnover margin but about equal in yards. TURNOVERS, not lack of ability, is why Tech lost the game last year. I challenge you to show me any team that can win when – 7 in the turnover margin.

Tech’s biggest problem is mistakes. The Miami game was no different. Missed blocks nearly every play, which led to the disaster. Every team has down games.

For all those who point to the Wake Forest game:

Total yards: GT – 463, Wake – 263

Tech dominated the game but shot itself in the foot with VERY untimely penalties – many of which led to either Wake scoring or Tech getting points taken off the board.

Let’s face it. Tech is impressive this year and deserves their spot in the top 10. No. Not the best team in the nation, but I don’t think anybody would want to play them right now. Even Florida, Alabama, or LSU.

Let the facts speak for themselves

November 11th, 2009
5:50 pm

Correction…

Tech – 463, Wake – 291

Buckhead Jacket

November 11th, 2009
6:04 pm

Swap Tech back into the SEC for Vandy in the ACC and let’s see where it all ends up in 5 years. Then you’ll have your answer…………………….Go Bumble Bees

Username

November 11th, 2009
6:05 pm

38-3 ………… enough said.

Taylor

November 11th, 2009
6:11 pm

I think its funny how Mark uses stats and stories from previous seasons to sell his points, as if Alabama’s 2008 record has anything to do with how good this team is. Tech would rank second behind Alabama. They would beat Florida.

Scoots

November 11th, 2009
6:11 pm

Still to come:

GaTech vs. Georgia
Florida St. vs. Florida
S.Carolina vs. Clemson

Perhaps after that time, we’ll have a better idea of how these two conferences stack up. I don’t think last year’s games have a lot to do with this year’s games.

We know Alabama beat VaTech, which I think may actually be the 4th best team in the ACC behind GT, Miami and Clemson. We know Tech handled Miss St. and Vandy, but they are lowly teams in the SEC. I can’t think of any other cross-conference games that took place this year.

So ultimately, we don’t know much at this point. My feeling is, aside from UF and Bama, the two leagues are pretty close this year. I think it would be great if Tech won out their games and had the opportunity to play whichever of UF/Bama does not make it to the BCS championship game. It would certainly answer some questions

Dawgday

November 11th, 2009
6:15 pm

“Anyone who says there isn’t an imbalance between leagues, at least at their respective summits, isn’t dealing in reality.”

m? you listening m? I think this was directed at you… m.

Sam Sessions

November 11th, 2009
6:15 pm

wes

November 11th, 2009
5:24 pm

“there’s still a difference between the personnel of a top-shelf SEC team and of everyone else.”

Then explain why more ACC players have been taken in the NFL draft over the past 4-5 years than the SEC has?

Once again you talk out your azz wes. As usual. Below are the facts.

SEC Football Players in the 2009 NFL Draft
Posted: April 26, 2009
SEC LEADS NATION IN NFL DRAFT SELECTIONS

# The SEC had the most selections in this weekend’s National Football League player draft. The SEC had 37 of its players selected followed by the ACC with 33, the Pac-10 with 32, Big 12 and the Big Ten with 28 each and the Big East with 27. The Mountain West Conference had 16 players selected while the Western Athletic Conference and Conference USA had 10 each.

# Eleven of the 12 SEC schools had at least one player selected in the draft. South Carolina led the SEC with seven players selected followed by Georgia and LSU with six each and Alabama and Ole Miss with four each.

# The SEC has now led or tied for the lead in the most selections in an NFL Draft in 10 of the last 12 years, including the last three drafts.

# Since 1990, the SEC has had 739 players selected in NFL Drafts, tops in the nation.

Dan Gates

November 11th, 2009
6:17 pm

How about it wes? Appears you don’t know your college football.

Scoots

November 11th, 2009
6:18 pm

You always hear the media hype on the SEC say “There’s no breaks in the SEC – every week is an all-out battle.”

Kentucky, Miss St., Vanderbilt, Mississippi, plus 2 or 3 cupcakes on the schedule. That’s about half the season right there.

RamblinA

November 11th, 2009
6:22 pm

Give Paul Johnson a few more years, his own recruits, and we compete with anyone in the land. I don’t think it is so much that the SEC defense could handle our offense as much as it is our defense is terrible and couldn’t handle their offense.

A few more years, possibly a new DC, and we rise above! GO JACKETS!!! THWG

RamblinA

November 11th, 2009
6:26 pm

also, the SEC is top heavy. Anyone in the ACC could compete with any of the other SEC teams, and the better half of the ACC beats them. All of the ACC might lose to the top 3, but the rest of SEC isn’t doing much better…

Miami is on the rise, VT is always in there…they have a tough loss to Alabama, GT is obviously on the rise, Clemson is fantastic given a smarter head coach (Debo is an idiot!)…give the ACC a few years. We rise! …this is fantastic given the academic rigor of the ACC!

Scoots

November 11th, 2009
6:27 pm

Dr. J – look at the latest polls. GT is one of 4 teams in the top 25, and we’ve been 2 of the other 3.

SEC on the other hand has 3 teams

RealDawg

November 11th, 2009
6:28 pm

LOL..Mark just said Tech=Georgia because that is the spot in the SEC we are :)

Tech Geezer

November 11th, 2009
6:32 pm

Geez, Louise. If a frog had wings….
TB you’re just agitating the poor desperate Georgia fans.

SEC is good but there is a lot of separation between the top and the bottom. ACC is good and pretty equal top to bottom. ACC is a great conference if you are a thinking person but don’t go betting the farm on any game you think you can predict the winner.

TW

RamblinA

November 11th, 2009
6:32 pm

turd hater, your an idiot. Tech’s strength of schedule is better than everyone on that list.

Give it up, Auburn is terrible, UGAY is terrible, tennessee, south carolina…the list goes on.

If you want to talk about overrated teams in the BCS based on strength of schedule, go check out Boise…they play the likes of San Jose State and Miami of Ohio, and Louisiana Tech…etc

Your dumb turd a$$ couldn’t so much as clean the toilets at Tech. THWG

RamblinA

November 11th, 2009
6:32 pm

turd hater, your an idiot. Tech’s strength of schedule is better than everyone on that list.

Give it up, Auburn is terrible, UGAY is terrible, tennessee, south carolina…the list goes on.

If you want to talk about overrated teams in the BCS based on strength of schedule, go check out Boise…they play the likes of San Jose State and Miami of Ohio, and Louisiana Tech…etc

Your dumb a$$ couldn’t so much as clean the toilets at Tech. THWG

Frank Wren

November 11th, 2009
6:36 pm

Talent will soon be pouring out in droves to wear the white and gold.

Not with that offense they wont. The best players want to use college to prepare for the NFL. Techs “system” doesnt do that.

RamblinA

November 11th, 2009
6:36 pm

RealDawg… He said that Tech>UGA because we take your spot, therefore sending you farther down the totem pole.

UGA fans have the IQ of a gold fish.

Bzzz...you mean zzzz...

November 11th, 2009
6:45 pm

I sincerely hope that all the teams ranked ahead of Tech lose in the next 3 weeks with the exception of UF. And that the cocky bee’s get their butt handed to them by a real SEC team. The only reason you put 50+ up on Vandy is b/c you ran down the field and got a touchdown, then your defensive allowed them to do the same, thus getting your “vaunted” offense back on the field quicker. How about you learn how to play defense down there in Atlanta…or god forbid play a good defensive team!!! GO GATORS!

Dan Gates

November 11th, 2009
6:47 pm

It’s going to be absolutely hilarious in here if UGA beats Tech.

Just me

November 11th, 2009
7:05 pm

Dear Jacketnation, this blog is about football and football rankings. While your rantings about grades, intelligence, majors and criminal records may be correct, they have nothing to do with football. Please stay on topic. Tech would be 5th overall. I think they pick up an extra loss to Tennessee or Auburn.

Dan Gates

November 11th, 2009
7:12 pm

Tennessee would control the ball on Tech’s defense and Monte Kiffins defense would stop PJ’s O. As sorry as Tech’s D is I am surprised that more teams that win the toss don’t take the ball first and attempt to control the clock on Tech’s D. When Tech’s O can’t dominate the clock they’re toast. I was very surprised that WF took shots down the field in 3 third and short situations instead of calling plays that could have moved the chains. Another 1st down or 2 and WF wins that football game.

GT For You And Me

November 11th, 2009
7:44 pm

Who Cares! We would still be better than GAGGA!!!!

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
7:50 pm

Dan Gates: TECH’s D would not make Compton look like P.Manning when he looked like your wife in all the other games. Monte is good but he ain’t that good and UT’s O ain’t nothing but crap. I mean UT looked great against UGA’s willie D but that don’t say much. When you want to try to come and control the clock you better bring some players not the crap you have on rockytop right now.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
7:52 pm

Yeah ,,, it’s easy to be #1 and #2 with numbers like these …

Saragin SOS rankings:

UGAg – 10
Georgia Tech – 12
LSU – 17
BAMA – 25
Florida – 42
(you can see it here: http://www.kiva.net/~jsagarin/sports/cfsend.htm)

Essentially, Tech plays the same SOS as UGAg … Tech is 9-1, 7th in the nation …

Georgia is , urm, 5-4 and 37th in the nation …

Dawgs, stop barking …

Pi$$onaDawg

November 11th, 2009
7:55 pm

Jacket Fan don’t pick on my DAWg we did keep our players out of jail this season didn’t we, signed CMR.

Jimbo

November 11th, 2009
8:03 pm

Comparing the second place SEC team (Alabama) to a fifth place ACC (Clemson) team is not a comparison. Clemson went 7 – 6 last year. Va Tech is 3rd in the Coastal division in the ACC this year. Miami flat out rolled them and they lost to UNC. Not much of a comparison. I would like to see Florida or Alabama play GA Tech. Then you would have top teams playing from each conference.

Jimbo

November 11th, 2009
8:05 pm

Oh yea. Clemson has beaten South Carolina 10 out of the last 12 years. They have comparable records. It is all about match ups.

GWB

November 11th, 2009
8:09 pm

Pi$$onaDawg you are one abject moron. Tennessee’s running game and offensive line would be enough to get your D. And I hate to tell you idiot child, but Monte Kiffin is considered one of the best defensive minds in the business according to folks that know a hell of a lot more about football than a retard like you. But I will give you this much. You’re damn sure in the running for biggest dumbazz ever to post in a blog.

Seth

November 11th, 2009
8:13 pm

Pi$$onaDawg is your blowup plastic boyfriend worn out. You blog 24/7. Maybe you should get a real boyfriend or something. Based on all the boys walking around holding hands on the GT campus that shouldn’t be so hard to do.

HairyDawg

November 11th, 2009
8:16 pm

You Techie nerds cracken me ups with the posting after hitting on the cracks pipes.

At best Techies would be a little above Vandy in the SEC. If you had to play against the big boys with SEC speeds every week, Techies is no better than 500 overall and 250 in confrance. You fluked and got lucky last year in Athens before LSU shows you what SEC talents is like.

Againts the elitesm teams like FLA, Bama, and Dawgs, Techies high school offense is goning to be run off fielding. The GT D is pathetically pass covering and rushing with SEC speedy receivers toasting them all days.

The rest of real footballs fans is laughable at the Techies and theys unreal imaginatory dreaming of greatness while being second rate stinker even within state of Georgia. Considering whole SEC or entire nations, at best Techie competes with Vandy and the other chumps schools. The nerds can’t play in a games with the SEC speeds excepts for to taking a beats down like being processed and shredded as meat for a soup bowl of chicken against LSU.

Dr. J

November 11th, 2009
8:17 pm

who’s the biggest win for tech and what are they ranked?

Richard Machado

November 11th, 2009
8:29 pm

Mark must be used to getting hammered by GT fans/Alum of which I am one.
Maybe this year we fall in the SEC where MB predicts although I think we can beat LSU and as MB says, on any given Saturday could take out UF and the tide, no doubt. We did pile up a lot of yards against LSU just not effective. But MB is right about the speed of the LSU and Bama defense. I saw it also and noted how dang fast they are. But and this is a big butt, I think CPJ wins the league in two years no matter what league he is in. We move to the SEC and CPJ’s recruiting is commensurate, we take the title very soon after.

Robert E.

November 11th, 2009
8:29 pm

For a program that’s been the equivalent of every opponents fire hydrant since 1965, you Tech fans sure are coming out of the woodwork all of a sudden talking like you are a lot more than a team barely over .500 in the last 40 years. Everyone of you will slink back into hiding when GT losses to UGA, Clemson, and your bowl game. If that happens it couldn’t happen to a finer group of fair weather bandwagon fans that still refuse to put their meat in a seat in person at a GT game.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
8:32 pm

Saragin SOS rankings:

UGAg – 10
Georgia Tech – 12
LSU – 17
BAMA – 25
Florida – 42
(you can see it here: http://www.kiva.net/~jsagarin/sports/cfsend.htm)

Essentially, Tech plays the same SOS as UGAg … Tech is 9-1, 7th in the nation …

Georgia is , urm, 5-4 and 37th in the nation …

Dawgs just bark … Jackets STING!

Doug Edwards

November 11th, 2009
8:32 pm

Richard too bad PJ won’t be your coach that long.

Les Miles

November 11th, 2009
8:34 pm

So the nerd fan ramblin states that anyone in the acc can play with anyone in the acc……well apparently Virginny can not play with that powerhouse of William & Mary and Maryland can not play with Middle Tennessee State. One thing the nerds can play with however is themselves.

Reggie Ball

November 11th, 2009
8:36 pm

Nice post thair hairy dawg……it is quite fun posting as someone else ain’t it….see how much funs i be havin

HairyDawg

November 11th, 2009
8:40 pm

Besides you Techies dont need to waste no time fretten about SEC ranking for the nerds. You soon goning to be dropping to 3rd or worst in state behind Dawgs and then GA States.

LSU in chicken bowel shows what happens to that high school offensive facing SEC speed defensing teams.

100 YARD CLOUD OF DUST

November 11th, 2009
8:43 pm

A healthy Jonathan Dyer would run all over ANY SEC DEFENSE.

Fresh_Canton

November 11th, 2009
8:44 pm

What happens when Tech goes down to UGA this year? Think it can’t happen….think again.

100 YARD CLOUD OF DUST

November 11th, 2009
8:45 pm

NESBITT is one tough DUDE.

100 YARD CLOUD OF DUST

November 11th, 2009
8:46 pm

Bay Bay Thomas is better than any SEC reciever.

Rob

November 11th, 2009
8:54 pm

They might finish there with the recruits they have now, but I’m sure we would attract a lot better talent if we were in the SEC rather than the ACC. Big time players go to the conferences where they will be seen for their career’s sake. Besides that, we still haven’t really seen any of Paul Johnson’s players yet…we are still playing with Gailey’s guys.

Reggie Ball

November 11th, 2009
9:13 pm

hoo be hating on dwyer? damn right he run all over any sec defence…..just looks what gtu dids against lsu last years….we be doin’ it hear in da hood

NorthWestDawg

November 11th, 2009
9:15 pm

“My first inclination is to say the Jackets would finish wherever Mike Slive’s refs got together and decided they should be, but that’s my little joke.” … Mark, I think that sums up the SEC this year–and it’s not really THAT funny, if truth be told, because that joke is rooted to deep in reality.

And while I think Tech is the class of the ACC, this isn’t saying that much. Who has Tech beaten that’s noteworthy? No one. So, it’s fine to make assumptions about where Tech might finish, beating the SEC’s two perennial bottom feeders and a bunch of also-rans in the ACC doesn’t mean they’re all that great. … But in fairness to all, no one has looked that great this year in any league against good competition on a consistent basis.

I do think Tech is better than Georgia this year, but a blind man could see that. But I wouldn’t bet the farm on Tech just yet. In this year of mediocrity, you just never know.

bcwreck

November 11th, 2009
9:21 pm

I think Tech would do very well this year in the SEC… maybe top 4 or 5. I’m just hoping that Tech plays in the BCS Championship game this year. I think they deserve it.

ambushed

November 11th, 2009
9:21 pm

Tech WAS in the SEC. A charter member, they turned YELLOW and left. That’s Dodd’s legacy being chicken, cuttin’ and running. They would be about 4th alright…in the east.

TeeBerry

November 11th, 2009
9:27 pm

Let’s see, Bradley also said Brett Favre was overrated. Oh, yeaaahhhh.
I think the GB Packers will tell you Mark Bradley is full of number 2.

You know, I’ve NEVER heard anyone say the ACC is the sixth best BCS conference. I guess that comes from the source of Mark’s # 2s.

The SEC is the toughest conference year in and year out. No doubt. But that doesn’t diminish the ACC. Incidentally, there are more top 25 teams in the ACC at present than in the SEC, or any other conference: Clemson, Tech, VPI, and Miami.

Mark also said Bob Waterford was a better quarterback than Brett Favre.
Favre has a lifetime QB rating north of 92. Waterford had more interceptions than TD’s. And a QB rating south of 69.

What a sports oracle.

67Cheers

November 11th, 2009
9:31 pm

DC Dawg earlier on this blog stated: “You little bugs have now all appeared and talking trash as though you have some amazing tradition of football.”

DC….you stand corrected. GT has an absolutely amazing tradition in football. Can you imagine seeing the highest honor in college football named the Butts Trophy? I’d like to see your Butts pose DC.

JacketFan

November 11th, 2009
9:40 pm

Hey, mutts, you keep ignoring the numbers …

Saragin SOS rankings:

UGAg – 10
Georgia Tech – 12
LSU – 17
BAMA – 25
Florida – 42
(you can see it here: http://www.kiva.net/~jsagarin/sports/cfsend.htm)

Essentially, Tech plays the same SOS as UGAg … Tech is 9-1, 7th in the nation …

Georgia is , urm, 5-4 and 37th in the nation …

Dawgs lost their bark … left with a whimper.

HairyDawg

November 11th, 2009
9:47 pm

67Cheers – “DC….you stand corrected. GT has an absolutely amazing tradition in football. Can you imagine seeing the highest honor in college football named the Butts Trophy? I’d like to see your Butts pose DC”

67 thats real maturing to makes funs of the mans name. Seems to me yall been running arounds with a bunches of Johnsons, Balls, and Coxs for sometimes nows.

In realty you nerds team is just a ufenism for kitty cats.

67Cheers

November 11th, 2009
9:51 pm

Hey Hairy….good to see I got a rise out of you. Not only does GT have an amazing tradition in college football, but also laughs last. Revenge of the Nerds is a reality, puppy boy.

Jackets Keep Rollin'

November 11th, 2009
10:01 pm

May be I’m the crazy, but I just dont fall into the category of people who cares to keep talking about the SEC. Ugh, enough already. This has been one of the best seasons ever for TECH, but one of the most boring national races ever, since the media folk wont SHUT UP about the SEC.

Mr. Bradley, thanks for the article. But seriously, you might as well be talking about NASCAR — you know, the SEC fans are kinda similar…

[...] word of explanation: This whole thing got started, as whole things will, when I posed the question: Where would Tech rank in the SEC? (Fourth behind Florida, Alabama and LSU, I said.) One or two of you suggested an even better idea [...]

GT GRAD

November 11th, 2009
10:34 pm

Well let’s see:

IF GT had Florida’s schedule:

Charleston Southern – Win
Troy – Win
Tenessee – Win
Kentucky – Win
LSU – Loss
Arkasas – Win
Miss St – Win
UGA – Win
Vandy – Win
South Carolina – Win
Florida International – Win
FSU – Win

GT would be 11-1 (unless the SEC referees wanted GT to be undefeated as they obviously have helped Florida – if this were the case the LSU game would be a Win as well & GT would be 12-0)!

Fairly convincing I would say!!

Important comments regarding the 38-3 LSU game: I understand the final score was UGLY, but I am a little tired of so many people claiming LSU shut our offense down.

LSU had 324 yards total offfense.

GT had 314 yards total offense.

The difference in the game was primarily from turnovers and poor field position.

LSU had ZERO turnovers.

GT had THREE turnovers.

GT was also 2 for 6 on 4th down……….just like FOUR more turnovers.

The game got away from GT early and the snowball kept getting bigger and bigger as the desperation plays continued going in the favor of LSU.

LSU beat GT soundly (38-3) and I am not suggesting anything different; however, they did NOT shut Coach PJ’s offense down as so many people and media pundits are claiming.

GT JP

November 11th, 2009
11:02 pm

First off, the ACC is a fantastic conference. The schools are prestigious and athletically sound. As far as being ’sixth of the BCS conferences,’ that’s ridiculous. I have watched a lot of football this season, probably too much, the only conferences that are more competitive top-to-bottom are the Pac-10 and Big East, maybe the SEC. The Big Ten and Big 12 have proven pretty soft.

Second, the match-ups that you mentioned in your article, Alabama/Clemson, GT/LSU, and Alabama/VT are extremely convenient and poor examples. Alabama practically played for a NC last season and is likely to play for one this season. LSU was the previous years National Champ.

George

November 11th, 2009
11:03 pm

Calvin, Have you forgot Georgia Tech has already beat Clemson this year

HairyDawg

November 11th, 2009
11:05 pm

The Chicken Soup Bowl was 38 – 3 and you wimpy nerds was winering about score running by an SEC team of Tigers. The Dawgs is goning to do much worst than the Tigers againt you.

I cant even waits till AJ Green drops 50+ big ones on that pourus Techie D. I smells another 51 – 7 beating down in Atlanta after Turkey Day.

But first you’d be choking on Blued Devils to lose ACC this Sats in high school game at Durhams.

Go Dawgs!

HairyDawg

November 11th, 2009
11:09 pm

At 38-3 the Bengle Tigers found that Chicken Soup was good Soul food for them Cajuns while exposuring the ACC as a chumps confrence.

fuzzybee76

November 11th, 2009
11:20 pm

GT grad
Nice post. I agree with much of this. I think the tossup games are UT and LSU, both with good defenses. I think we beat LSU and UT this year by outscoring them. Last years team was very young. Special teams were awful in chicken bowl. Lets dont forget BAMA got smacked by Utah with an average 60th rated recruting class and a great mis-direction spread option. Everybody thought Utah would lose big!
Lets see how Tech does against UGA and Clemson does against USC and see how the bowls play out. Love to see UM get LSU back in the chicken bowl.

Alan

November 11th, 2009
11:22 pm

I am a GT fan all the way. Graduated from GT, had a son and daughter Graduate from GT and my 3rd child goes to GT. That said, i would have to agree with you.

fuzzybee76

November 11th, 2009
11:37 pm

answering Bradleys question. 3rd. Next year, barring NFL jumpers, look out! We lose 3 starters off the
2 deep chart ie 3 out of 44 players. The redshirt class coming up is strong! All skill guys back. And a coach with brass ones!:))

HairyDawg

November 11th, 2009
11:54 pm

fuzzybee76 – “Next year, barring NFL jumpers, look out! We lose 3 starters off the2 deep chart ie 3 out of 44 players. The redshirt class coming up is strong! All skill guys back.”

That’d be like saying UGAs goes back to No. 1 this years if Moreono and Stafford stays. They didnt and we aint.

But we still more than good enoughs to whoops All-bums, Kens Tuck, and Bugs for a table running.

VanLeerDeathCampSurvivor

November 11th, 2009
11:58 pm

Everybody makes mention of the head to head match ups between the SEC and other conferences, particularly the Big 10. But none of these match ups occur in the thick of the season. They happen after the incredibly long November/December layoff. I think that SEC teams have an advantage in terms of preparation for the bowls because of the warmer climes. I think this is the same advantage that USC has over Big Ten schools. Yeah, you can point to Bama’s victories over Clemson and VT, but those teams were overrated from the get-go. Look at how badly they finished after those losses.
I can’t explain LSU’s shellacking of GT last year…and I won’t even try.

fuzzybee76

November 12th, 2009
12:00 am

HairyDawg
Let me be the first to welcome you to Bobby Dodd this year for the 2nd of 3 in a row! What was that you said, thank you sir may I have another!!!!!

BS Patrol

November 12th, 2009
1:05 am

Alan,
Unbelievable! Why don’t you just get down on your knees and pray to the Dooley statue?

Navyfan

November 12th, 2009
8:32 am

Teddy, SEC solution = putting 9 in the box and it will shut down the Jackets? Because the Jackets can’t throw? Idiot. You are obviously biased enough to let your prejudice get in the way of good sense. Uh….heard of “BeBe” Thomas? He’s kind of GaTech’s lead receiver who burns corners when defenses put 9 in the box. Teams don’t shut down GaTech with your lego solution of 9 in the box. Laughable conclusion. Ohio State tried that on Navy. The Navy this year, that burned Wake Forest, Notre Dame and almost upset the Buckeyes. It doesn’t work. GaTech will catch them with 1 on 1 coverage, almost every time. In case you didn’t know, Thomas is an NFL sure thing, which Navy doesn’t have… You really stand by your assessment? Reassess. GaTech would do well with the pass. They derail defenses through the air with ‘9 in the box’. Conduct a modicum of research, and see PJ’s record at Georgia Southern and how many yds he got through the air. Hint– a lot. It’s that exact reaction to the run (9 in the box) that allows easy, huge plays through the air. GaTech would do just fine in the SEC. You’ll see in the next few years. Going to enjoy the next few years…. you won’t. Remember to tell me how the crow tastes.

UTVol

November 12th, 2009
8:46 am

Two UT players arrested early morning for armed robbery. Starting safety Janzen Jackson and receiver Nu’Keese Richardson.

[...] It’s clear – to me, if not to CJ Spiller and Dabo Swinney — that Georgia Tech is the class of the ACC. But the ACC is often described as the least of the six BCS leagues, and another conference in the neighborhood is regarded as the best. …Read Original Story: There's a difference between ACC speed and SEC speed. (AJC photo by Curtis … [...]

JM

November 12th, 2009
10:41 am

You must also mention that GT’s talent would be upgraded if they were in the SEC. Face it alot of people around the highschool programs push kids into SEC programs even when other schools would be a better fit. (look at the recent transfer to GT from Alabama as a recent example)

Partha

November 12th, 2009
11:50 am

I like this article because it’s a different perspective. For the last few years the ACC was all Florida St and Virginia Tech, and now it’s about GT and Clemson. But what if Tech went back to its SEC days, today?

Nice article.

Dead Mike

November 12th, 2009
12:52 pm

It’s official. Tech fans are back on the bandwagon. What a joke. I hope CPJ leaves as soon as he gets an offer from an elite football school. Tech “fans” (if you can call them that) don’t deserve him. People say Braves fans are the worst in MLB but I think Georgia Tech has the worst fans in any sport. Even now their fans don’t show up to games. When the team is down it is because it is too hard to recruit at GT and football is only important to morons. When the program goes back up for a season or two all the sudden football is the most important thing in the world.

Philip

November 12th, 2009
3:49 pm

Just for the record, who beat Tech last year in the bowl game?? Oh yeah, a SEC team hammered them down! I am just saying…..

willie martinez

November 12th, 2009
7:19 pm

jacketnation, you need to practice on your subject verb agreement. requirements is plural.

best, willie

Pi$$onaDawg

November 12th, 2009
7:53 pm

DEAD MIKE: I been on this TECH bandwagon since 72 through the good and bad. Had season tickets for a long time. How long you had your tickets?

CFBFanatic

November 13th, 2009
2:30 am

Believe it or not Mr. Bradley, the SEC is not the be-all end-all of college football. I don’t know where to start. Its one thing to claim the SEC as the best conference in college football – they are. Its totally different to completely dismiss every other league as far and away worse.

What I can’t figure out about SEC fans (That’s fans of the conference, like yourself…Not to be confused with fans of the schools from the SEC) is how they find the need to trash the ACC endlessly yet can’t explain why the SEC was .500 against the ACC last year or why the SEC is just slightly above .500 against the ACC in the last 3, 5, and 10 years.

And BTW, in case you haven’t watched a game without an SEC team in it, there is PLENTY of talent and speed in the ACC. Check out the NFL draft for the past five years or so. Clemson, UNC, and VT have defenses just as talented and fast as any team in the SEC.

LSUfan

November 16th, 2009
11:45 am

It is funny how everyone bashes LSU and as an LSU fan I will admit we have struggled with some of our games. Let’s look at the scores. LSU held Florida to 13 points. Even thought this team had an extra week to rest up and prepare for the game. UF is a great team, but it is the lowest scoring game they have had to date. The alabama game had a call that was “let’s say” wrong in the fourth quarter. Video evidence and the announcers comply with this testimony. They didn’t win by many points. The only two losses we have this year are against number 1 & 2 by very few points. We have a great defense. We struggle with our offense. GT has a great program and so does most of the SEC Schools. UF and Bama are the best in the league this year. GT would probably be somewhere in the middle, but I do think Georgia, SC and LSU would beat them if the game were held today. To say Tech could go right through LSU’s Defense. I say no. Remember Look at the final scores of the games. A win is a win and everyone knows that is the only thing that matters to voters in the polls.

Ben

December 8th, 2009
12:16 am

What a joke. You’re not thinking about wear and tear caused by playing in the SEC. When you suggest that GT is better than Ole Miss or Auburn, you’re looking from the perspective of a relatively fresh GT, because they play only a handful of real talent, vs. teams that have played somebody just about every week. If Tech had to play Bama, LSU, Auburn, Ole Miss, Arkansas, Vandy and Mississippi State, in that order, they would lose every game. You ever wonder how Bama can play a team like Chattanooga and still get to the National championship game–its because most of their other games are twice as tough.