<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hot Button, Part 2: Where would UGA rank in the ACC?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/</link>
	<description>The AJC sports columnist is a blogging fool. But you knew that already</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:33:25 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dawgfan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-145781</link>
		<dc:creator>dawgfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:35:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-145781</guid>
		<description>What do all of the techies think now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do all of the techies think now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawg Fan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-134604</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawg Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 20:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-134604</guid>
		<description>The Dawgs would rank first in the Almost College Conference because they beat GT, USC beat Clemson, and UGA beat USC.  Go Dawgs!!! 30-24.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Dawgs would rank first in the Almost College Conference because they beat GT, USC beat Clemson, and UGA beat USC.  Go Dawgs!!! 30-24.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair weather Tech fan who has been afraid to show my face the last 10 years but now have balls after one season</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-114195</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair weather Tech fan who has been afraid to show my face the last 10 years but now have balls after one season</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-114195</guid>
		<description>7-1!  Tech would be second to last in the SEC only better than Vandy, who hung up over 30 on them!  We will see after the last regular season game and the bowl season! UGA just needs to watch tape of the Gardner-Webb game last season!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>7-1!  Tech would be second to last in the SEC only better than Vandy, who hung up over 30 on them!  We will see after the last regular season game and the bowl season! UGA just needs to watch tape of the Gardner-Webb game last season!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solid Gold Dancer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110827</link>
		<dc:creator>Solid Gold Dancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110827</guid>
		<description>Typo.....59-39-5 (my bad). Doesn&#039;t change my point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo&#8230;..59-39-5 (my bad). Doesn&#8217;t change my point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Solid Gold Dancer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110826</link>
		<dc:creator>Solid Gold Dancer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110826</guid>
		<description>Cherokee, for your information the series is 59-49-5 (in favor of uga). For all practical purposes, that&#039;s 60-40.....right. That my friend is a 10 game seperation. Here I&#039;ll help you out. Take &quot;10&quot; wins that went uga&#039;s way, 60wins - 10wins = 50wins......are you still with me. Now take those &quot;10&quot; wins and put them on Tech&#039;s total, 40wins + 10wins = 50wins. Like I said the series is seperated by 10 games. I knew I would have to explain that to someone.......wow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cherokee, for your information the series is 59-49-5 (in favor of uga). For all practical purposes, that&#8217;s 60-40&#8230;..right. That my friend is a 10 game seperation. Here I&#8217;ll help you out. Take &#8220;10&#8243; wins that went uga&#8217;s way, 60wins &#8211; 10wins = 50wins&#8230;&#8230;are you still with me. Now take those &#8220;10&#8243; wins and put them on Tech&#8217;s total, 40wins + 10wins = 50wins. Like I said the series is seperated by 10 games. I knew I would have to explain that to someone&#8230;&#8230;.wow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110779</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110779</guid>
		<description>HAHAHA come on Mark give Georgia more credit than that the teams Georgia lost to are in the top 20 excluding Tennessee

Jacksonville State – Win
Clemson- Win
Miami- Loss
North Carolina – Win
Miss State – Win
FSU – Win
VT – Loss
Virginia – Win
Vandy – Win
Wake Forest – Win
Duke – Win
GT– Win

10-2 is more likely 

Now if the nerd herd played our schedule
OSU– L
USC– W
Ark– W
ASU– W
LSU– L
UT– W
VU– W
UF– L
TTU– W
AU– L
UK– W
UGA– L</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHAHA come on Mark give Georgia more credit than that the teams Georgia lost to are in the top 20 excluding Tennessee</p>
<p>Jacksonville State – Win<br />
Clemson- Win<br />
Miami- Loss<br />
North Carolina – Win<br />
Miss State – Win<br />
FSU – Win<br />
VT – Loss<br />
Virginia – Win<br />
Vandy – Win<br />
Wake Forest – Win<br />
Duke – Win<br />
GT– Win</p>
<p>10-2 is more likely </p>
<p>Now if the nerd herd played our schedule<br />
OSU– L<br />
USC– W<br />
Ark– W<br />
ASU– W<br />
LSU– L<br />
UT– W<br />
VU– W<br />
UF– L<br />
TTU– W<br />
AU– L<br />
UK– W<br />
UGA– L</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fly Swatter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110693</link>
		<dc:creator>Fly Swatter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110693</guid>
		<description>&quot;In my view, there’s not an ACC team as good as Florida, Alabama or LSU, but several belong in the next tier. Tech is the best of that bunch, with Miami and Virginia Tech and now Clemson fitting the description. Do I think Georgia would beat any of those four on a neutral field? I don’t.&quot;

This is really silly and will be exposed as such when the DAWGS beat Tech in a few weeks. ACC is bad, Tech is overrated and will be exposed as such by the DAWGS and then Clemson. I hope Tech wins the ACC after getting beat by UGA. That would be about what I think of the ACC. Prepare your excuses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In my view, there’s not an ACC team as good as Florida, Alabama or LSU, but several belong in the next tier. Tech is the best of that bunch, with Miami and Virginia Tech and now Clemson fitting the description. Do I think Georgia would beat any of those four on a neutral field? I don’t.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is really silly and will be exposed as such when the DAWGS beat Tech in a few weeks. ACC is bad, Tech is overrated and will be exposed as such by the DAWGS and then Clemson. I hope Tech wins the ACC after getting beat by UGA. That would be about what I think of the ACC. Prepare your excuses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MAJ Bisch</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110619</link>
		<dc:creator>MAJ Bisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110619</guid>
		<description>Well, I guess Techie really is a Tech grad.  You can&#039;t argue with numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I guess Techie really is a Tech grad.  You can&#8217;t argue with numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DirtyDawg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110477</link>
		<dc:creator>DirtyDawg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110477</guid>
		<description>dawgrific, 

Keep in mind, Tech goes after all the same kids UGA does. When those kids commit to GT (because they didn&#039;t get a UGA offer) the nerd nation considers them &quot;student athletes,&quot; but if they get their dream offer to play at UGA the nerd trash automatically calls them &quot;thugs.&quot; It&#039;s very sad and lonely being a Yech fan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dawgrific, </p>
<p>Keep in mind, Tech goes after all the same kids UGA does. When those kids commit to GT (because they didn&#8217;t get a UGA offer) the nerd nation considers them &#8220;student athletes,&#8221; but if they get their dream offer to play at UGA the nerd trash automatically calls them &#8220;thugs.&#8221; It&#8217;s very sad and lonely being a Yech fan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dawgrific</title>
		<link>http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/2009/11/11/hot-button-part-2-where-would-uga-rank-in-the-acc/comment-page-13/#comment-110457</link>
		<dc:creator>dawgrific</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 16:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.ajc.com/mark-bradley-blog/?p=6553#comment-110457</guid>
		<description>Here we go with the &quot;UGA has a bunch of morons who get in due to questionable standards&quot; arguement.  Let us remember 2 geniuses that played, and thus stayed eligible for the techsters for 4+ years, Joe Hamilton and Reggie Ball-By the way, was Reggie Ball one of the many ineligible players that tech played a few years back that made them forfeit all of those wins (including 3 against UGA)?  UGA has just as tough as entrance standards, for athletes, as anyone else out there, and I wonder how many of gt&#039;s starters are studying engineering?
-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA-now that is a funny question to ponder isn&#039;t it??!!
p.s. I am guessing that Nesbitt is not on that list-lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here we go with the &#8220;UGA has a bunch of morons who get in due to questionable standards&#8221; arguement.  Let us remember 2 geniuses that played, and thus stayed eligible for the techsters for 4+ years, Joe Hamilton and Reggie Ball-By the way, was Reggie Ball one of the many ineligible players that tech played a few years back that made them forfeit all of those wins (including 3 against UGA)?  UGA has just as tough as entrance standards, for athletes, as anyone else out there, and I wonder how many of gt&#8217;s starters are studying engineering?<br />
-HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA-now that is a funny question to ponder isn&#8217;t it??!!<br />
p.s. I am guessing that Nesbitt is not on that list-lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
