Comments on: Forget Tech. UGA’s biggest remaining game is Auburn

By: Charles Corless

Charles Corless — Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:41:08 +0000

I wood like to know the score on Georgia and Auburn football game from 2009 though2004 game. I need to know the score on the past five (5) years please tail me the score .

By: iJax | Baker’s Dozen

iJax | Baker’s Dozen — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 20:29:09 +0000

[...] It seems to be a running theme for Georgia this season, but yet another Dawg rivalry game has lost its luster due to less than stellar years for the participants. For the first time since 1991, neither [...]

By: godawgs

godawgs — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:23:55 +0000

Mark Bradley-

Knowshon did NOT perform well early on in the “rotation” running back system. He had 70 yards on 20 carries in his 1st game vs. Ok St. I think that’s a 3.5 yard per carry average.

Not close to Ealey’s 5.1 yards per carry in even the ugly, non-contuniuity, “ROTATION” BACK “i-CAN’T-MAKE-A-DECISION” Bobo rushing gameplan.

Now, when Knowshon was allowed to become Georgia’s ONLY back, because of an injury situation, he florished there, getting over 100 yards in his 1st start on 14 carries.

Let’s wait to crown Knowshon until Ealey is given the ball 20 times in a game and done away with this “rotation” back garbage whihc squanders talent.

So far, EALEY beat Knowshon in High School in td’s and yardage, and he’s going to beat him in college, IF Bobo will give him a chance.

By: godawgs

godawgs — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 14:10:35 +0000

Mark-

On Nov. 9 at 12:15 on this thread you said:
Ealey is a good back. Knowshon was a great back.

Keep in mind Ealey rushed for 133 td’s in high School, Knowshon 128, Ealey over 8000 rushing yards, Knowshon under 7000.

Ealey was ranked #4 tailback coming out of High School, Knowshon was ranked #10.

In his brief college stint of 50 carries, Ealey has busted one for 44 yards, score 2 td’s, and is averaging 5.1 yards per carry.

Ealey is a GREAT BACK, Knowshon is a GREAT BACK too.

By: averageJoe

averageJoe — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:15:07 +0000

UGA v. GA Tech IS the biggest rivalry. This years game will be close because of two poor defenses. Tech will be favored, but will be looking ahead to Tampa. Dawgs win in an upset 31-28.

By: JacketFan

JacketFan — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:11:17 +0000

just a reminder …

Saragin SOS rankings:

UGAg – 10
Georgia Tech – 12
LSU – 17
BAMA – 25
Florida – 42
(you can see it here: http://www.kiva.net/~jsagarin/sports/cfsend.htm)

Essentially, Tech plays the same SOS as UGAg … Tech is 9-1, 7th in the nation …

Georgia is , urm, 5-4 and 37th in the nation …

GO DAWGS!!! WOOOHOOOOOO!

By: coachG

coachG — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:06:30 +0000

Anyone who thinks Richt has lost his moral way is an idiot and has obviously never met the man in person.

By: Big Dawg

Big Dawg — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 21:37:34 +0000

As a DAWG and someone who pulls for Tech except when they are playing Georgia. IMHO our biggest rival was, is and always will be Tech. This is the game that defines rivalry, while Auburn may be a rivalry game it doesn’t generate the pure hate that Tech does. Right now the Gators are the only team that comes close and that is because of their success against us the last 20 years.

Go Dawgs

By: FLA DAWG

FLA DAWG — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 20:18:18 +0000

Having come from Navy it wouldn’t surprise me if Johnson had a desire to coach ND. ND has had it rough for awhile now. I think it would take an outstanding, proven coach like Johnson to turn things around up there. Of course, he’d have one he!! of alot of BS to put up with considering the pressure ND Coaches get from their alumns.

By: HH

HH — Wed, 11 Nov 2009 18:06:52 +0000

With certain exceptions, Notre Dame has a lot more money than most schools to lay on the coach they want. If it’s Johnson, and they want him badly enough, I think they will probably get him. The “Chicago Alumni” generally get what they want. I don’t think Tech can compete monetarily. It will be interesting to see, if that’s the way it turns out. Same for FL with Urban, but Fl can pretty well match them dollar for dollar, I think.