
Mike Smith: Did timidity hurt his team? (AP photo)
I read Ron Borges‘ Monday column in the Boston Herald on the plane back, and I was impressed: He had a good point and made it nicely. And his point was:
Mike Smith coached a dud game against the Patriots.
I’m not apt to paraphrase Mr. Borges half as well as he expressed himself, so I’ll just quote:
“Falcons coach Mike Smith, of all people, should have known what was coming yesterday. Even when Tom Brady isn’t sharp, if you go soft on him he will make it hard on you.
“Yet despite being armed with knowledge gained from harsh experience, Smith allowed Atlanta defensive coordinator Brian VanGorder to make the same decision yesterday that Smith made Jan. 12, 2008.
“Both paid the same price: They got beat.
“At the time, Smith was the defensive coordinator of the Jacksonville Jaguars. In a divisional playoff game, he decided that his team could not pressure Brady under any circumstance and chose instead to drop seven and eight defenders into coverage.
“Brady carved them up as if he worked in a butcher shop. He set an NFL record for accuracy, going 26-of-28 with three touchdowns in a 31-20 win. His passer rating was 141.4.”
You’ll notice I said Mr. Borges had a good point. But I don’t know that I agree with it completely. To me, the Patriots’ running game (168 yards) beat the Falcons. Brady (27-of-42 for 277 yards) was only OK. He threw a late touchdown pass to tight end Chris Clark but missed every deep ball. The difference was, the Pats were gaining enough yards on first and second downs to put Brady in third-and-three, which is how they wound up with 28 first downs to the Falcons’ 13.
That said, I was surprised at how seldom the Falcons blitzed. Smith noted afterward that the Falcons sent “five or six” men at Brady in the first half, but clearly the Falcons were wrong-footed by the Pats’ sudden emphasis on the run.
“They’d run it 43 times and thrown it 100 [coming in],” Smith said afterward. “We didn’t fit the run as well as we’d have liked. We did not play the run the way we needed to.”
I thought the Falcons would play aggressively, both on offense and defense, than they did. Much of that had to do with New England hogging the ball for nearly 40 minutes. But New England wouldn’t have kept the ball had the Falcons taken it from them. And Mr. Borges’ point is overall a strong one, and one for the Birds to remember:
Faint heart never won the big game.
245 comments Add your comment
Absolute
September 29th, 2009
11:38 am
Not sure how this turned into a Ryan vs Vick thing but I agree Smitty was outcoached Sunday. I am sure he will right whatever is wrong and we will come out differently against SF. Vick won’t be an Eagle after this season so it won’t matter what Eagle fans say about him this year. He wants to be a starter and will be for some team next season.
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
11:39 am
@Tymar
Is that all you got?!?!?? Copying off some other lame ass dude? Be original… You’re lame, woman. Crisco,lol…..keep it coming woman
Just Curious
September 29th, 2009
11:40 am
Tymar
What does a blogger’s income have to do with the Falcons problems?
You are just showing your racism and stupidity.
JIMBOB
September 29th, 2009
11:40 am
Turner looks like he’s carrying more fat on his butt. But it is hard to detect on his physique. He’s definitely tip-toeing a bit more. The fumbles are the killer, and the most recent one came from a pretty average NFL hit, was not like someone got a perfect shoulder on the ball.
Ryan: his armstrength is probably mid-range by NFL standards, plenty strong enough, much stronger than Pennington’s. Not sure what role he has in playcalling, but the playcalling last week stunk. On the long bombs, he does tend to hold it a bit too long, but this will probably work itself out. Montana and Steve Young showed that you don’t need the strongest arm in the NFL.
I think we need to cut him loose a bit, have some games where he throws it 40-50 times. The running game is okay, but not looking as great as most were anticipating.
AlternateReality
September 29th, 2009
11:43 am
Is being outcoached by Belicheck a sin? Is it even a rarity? I think he pretty much outcoaches 99% of the coaches in the league.
Just Curious
September 29th, 2009
11:44 am
dbird1
Prior to last week, the Ravens were ranked 17th in defense.
Regardless if the team’s defense was ranked number 1 or number 32, if your quarterback can’t move the sticks, that defense will be useless.
Flacco has games of 308 & 342 yards and 6 touchdowns. Ryan has not passed for 300 yards this season.
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
11:45 am
Also, Tymar.
I’ve never once metioned my income on here. Like said…be original…quit riding other lame’s coatails trying to be funny,lol.
You must lack confidence in yourself….even with everyone attacking me on here for being a Vick fan…I’ve NEVER changed my stance…and I still give Ryan the props he deserves…..a good, but can’t carry a team QB. I say AGAIN….I do think that Ryan is a good QB….my opinion is that Vick is better/can be better. Ryan is better than Vick right now…we all know that…and he should be…but in the long run….the best will show..and we all know it will be Vick
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
11:49 am
Flacco vs Brady
Ryan vs Brady….oops we already know how that turned out
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
11:50 am
Has anyone seen the idiot “YUP” “WHAT UP” “WHAT”. He feels so stupid that he can’t show his COWARD face now
dbird1
September 29th, 2009
11:53 am
who ever is in love with Vick or Flacco. go to their blogs and you can gush over them with their fans. this is for Falcons fans. done
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
11:57 am
JIMBOB—
At least you have the balls to admit that Ryan’s arm strenth is sub-standard. You’re also right that Ryan holds the ball a little longer when (if ever) he throws the deep ball. Will it work itself out? I doubt it. What Ryan has on his side is anticipation….but if your arm is weak..it really doesn’t matter i.e “Chad Pennington”. If i remember right, Chad Pennington is the most accurate QB in NFL history, or one of the most accurate, yet he can’t stretch the field so it really doesn’t matter. Ryan is accurate, but if you’re throwing “Harrington passes” it does you no good.
Vick had his issues….but he was/is very unique. People always complain about having a “mobile” QB, yet when they don’t have one “Bucaneers Leftwich” they complain/bench him. My only complaint with Vick is that he didn’t balance running and passing at the right time..nor did he have the coaching in place to learn to do so..Blank is at fault also because Vick’s scrambling sold tickets (you know you were there cheering). Vick scrambled because he was the best that ever did it, and he was ENCOURAGED to do so…by coaches, management, and WE FANS WATED IT ALSO. Throw 130 million in there and Vick gets arrogant…I’ll admit that. He will never do that again though,,,I gurantee that.
He will shine again
JIMBOB
September 29th, 2009
12:07 pm
Never said his arm is substandard. It was good enough to pull out the Bears game last year. It was good enough to get the ball to Roddy in the endzone at the end of the Denver game (Roddy dropped it). It was good enough to get it into Jenkins hands 2 weeks ago, crucial 3rd and 10 with around 3-4 minutes left in the game–and Jenkins dropped it.
Ryan can make and does make plenty of great passes, especially in the clutch. There has been no indication that his arm is substandard, and the 2-1 record confirms it. I’ve seen no NFL pundits that have stated that his arm strength is hurting the Falcons.
IMO, the coaches need to study the Saints offense, let Ryan fling it more than 20-30 times per game.
heartofdarkness
September 29th, 2009
12:07 pm
Last time Atlanta played the Patriots, NE’s offensive line flattened the Falcons. Seems they did the same thing last Sunday as the Pats controlled the ball in the second half. I’m not sure the coaching staff has had enough time with this defensive group to teach them how to finess a game away from a team like NE that can overpower them so decisively. I’m pretty confident that they will, but we will have to be patient.
Meanwhile, with some improvements in twitter, maybe the Atlanta fans can call the plays, as I sense from many of the comments this crowd of experts has been wiping the field with the Pats on their Xbox.
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:11 pm
JIMBOB: “Ryan: his armstrength is probably mid-range by NFL standards” “On the long bombs, he does tend to hold it a bit too long”
Those are your comments…correct?
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:13 pm
JIMBOB: “IMO, the coaches need to study the Saints offense, let Ryan fling it more than 20-30 times per game.”
If I’m not mistaken…you need balance to win in the NFL. if Ryan throws the ball 30 times a game for the entire season..it could get ugly.
JIMBOB
September 29th, 2009
12:14 pm
Sure. Of course he has also completed some bombs, as well as held too long on others. It’s a timing issue, not strength issue.
Like I said: I’ve seen no NFL critics/writers that have stated that his arm-strength is any kind of problem–because it’s not.
veedub
September 29th, 2009
12:16 pm
We all know the defense has issues, knew that from the beginning. Noone has said anything about the “potent” offense that opened up no holes for Turner and when they did Turner couldn’t manage to hit them fast enough(looking a little fat). Overall execution by the offense was terrible. The defense was actually pretty stout through halftime and even then they were ok. Its hard to defend when you are on the fileover 60% of the time. And when the offense has no momentum whatsoever. Any other thoughts on offense
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:16 pm
JIMBOB: “I’ve seen no NFL pundits that have stated that his arm strength is hurting the Falcons”
The NFL pundits will…its like they do all stars…they build them up and tear them down….just like they did Vick and everyone else. The media has alot of power…too much power
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:19 pm
JIMBOB….people didn’t have a problem with Vick scrambling either……really man…think about it. Ryan is a star now…..everyone loves him….now…things can change very quickly. The media loved Joey “Field Goal” Harrington at one time….even Leftwich recieved some love. QBs get all the glory…and all the blame also
webhead
September 29th, 2009
12:20 pm
We needed the All-Pro Keith Brooking back to stop the run. They never would have run over Brooking like that He is a tackling machine. Everybody sees how he changed the Dallas defense already. Should never have disrespected him like they did.
veedub
September 29th, 2009
12:23 pm
Defense was actually ok?? Really what we expected. Offense was a dissapointment, no momentum, no fire, and they didn’t show up after halftime. The offense should be the defensive spark for this team. Instead everyone want to poit to the “D”. Even if the D would have held after haftime we still lose because guess what. THE OFFENSE NEVER SCORED AGAIN?? Any thoughts? valid or not valid?
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:24 pm
JIMBOB: “Sure. Of course he has also completed some bombs”
i can remember 2 bombs off the top of my head…i could be wrong..but not many. In my opinion, Ryan may be Chad Pennington 2.0…an upgraded version in a sense….that’s not a bad thing…Pennington is one of the most accurate QBs in NFL history…only problem is…..he didn’t win enough….check downs get you nowhere. Only QBs that’s been successful at that type of game is Montana and S. Young…of course..they had the Great Jerry Rice and other WRs that could run after the catch…..falcons don’t have that…
Curious George
September 29th, 2009
12:34 pm
Would “Vick Supporter” still be supporting MIKE VICK if # 7 were of Latin or Irish descent?
JIMBOB
September 29th, 2009
12:39 pm
Vick supporter– Vick no longer plays for the Falcons, it makes no sense to obsess over him.
Last I checked, he’s back in the NFL and doing fine. I doubt even Vick would want you to obsess over him and to attack Ryan.
Ryan has shown every indication that he can complete 4th down conversions. Due to some bad playcalling he never got the chance late in the game. I would not think that this is his fault.
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:40 pm
lmao @Curious George
Woman, read my posts..they are not racist in any way. Could you point this out to himMark Bradley? if my comments are racist…please let me know
Steve C
September 29th, 2009
12:40 pm
You people are sad and miserable. If you want something to complain about, go back to the Atlanta Falcons circa 1985-1989 with Marion Campbell coaching. THOSE were miserable days. At least we have a good enough team that we were optomistic going into New England and possibly taking down Belichick and Brady. As far as our two wins, they happened to be over two teams that won their division last year. We have 13 games left, so everyone come back here in Decamber and January and then see who is the better TEAM. You guys try to hold up or crucify one individual out of 22 that play the game on Sundays. I come here to see if Bradley or Ledbetter have any good scoop on the team, and all I read is you spewing your vitriolic drivel. Get lives and enjoy the greatest sport ever played.
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:44 pm
Steve C is on point..yet the truth must be told…………
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
12:47 pm
Curious George
I don’t think there are any Latin or Irish qbs that run 4.3 and has a cannon of an arm.
Let me turn the question on you:
Would you support Ryan if he wasn’t caucasian?
Shaunte
September 29th, 2009
12:48 pm
No, Curious George, he would not support anyone who doesn’t look like him, no matter who vile and ugly that person my be ON THE INSIDE.
Census Taker
September 29th, 2009
12:50 pm
Mark Sanchez is not of Latin/Hispanic heritage?
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
12:50 pm
“SUPER BOWL FAVORITES”
Brady and Patriots brace for Baltimore Ravens
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 08:05 AM ET
By: Chance Harper | http://www.sbrforum.com
In what could be an AFC Championship preview, Tom Brady and New England will host Ray Lewis and Balitmore this Sunday at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro. Brady and the Patriots eased past Atlanta last Sunday for a 26-10 win and have seen their original 3-point chalk in this one bet down to just one. Meanwhile the Ravens come in off a 34-3 thrashing of the Browns, holding Cleveland to under 200 yards of offense.
Let’s see if you can survive this one, Mr. Brady.
Those pesky New England Patriots just don’t seem to know when their so-called dynasty is over. Just when all seemed dark – a defense with more questions than answers, a shaky offensive line – New England’s old guard came up vintage against the young Atlanta Falcons. Brady hooked up with Randy Moss for 10 of his 25 completions that covered 277 yards in total, Fred Taylor rushed 21 times for 105 yards, and the Patriots (-4.5 at home) pulled away in the second half en route to a 26-10 victory.
So the City of Boston should get back to preparing for the Super Bowl parade, yes? They’ll just have to ignore the fact that the Pats aren’t the SBXLIV favorites anymore. That honor goes to the Baltimore Ravens, whose betting odds have shortened from 11-1 at the open to 6-1. New England is now second best on the futures market at 13-2, down a tick from 6-1 at the open and as low as 4-1 before the start of the regular season. The Ravens were available at 18-1 just a few short weeks ago.
Baltimore continues to have the benefit of the doubt, judging by the fact that the Patriots are as low as 1-point home faves this Sunday afternoon (1:00 p.m. Eastern, CBS) on their own turf in Foxborough, down from three points at the open. The very early consensus reports show 60 percent support for the visiting Ravens; they’re one of four teams to start the 2009 campaign at 3-0 SU and ATS – the Jets, Broncos and Saints are the others. New England is now 2-1 SU and 1-2 ATS as we head into October.
This will be the second week in a row that the Patriots have to contend with one of the rarest of success stories: a quarterback who flourished in his rookie season. Atlanta’s Matt Ryan actually played well in Week 3: 17-for-28 and pick-free, but only 199 yards passing and zero touchdowns. Michael Jenkins had a catch in the end zone overturned for offensive pass interference. The Falcons had their problems on the run, where Michael Turner carried 15 times for just 56 yards and coughed up a fumble for the second week in a row. But mostly it was Brady and Friends holding possession for nearly 40 minutes that kept Ryan from working his magic.
This week, it’ll be Joe Flacco taking his shots against what still is a suspect New England defense. Flacco “earned” the reputation of being a management-style QB last year, throwing 14 TD passes (with 12 picks) while the running game and Ray Lewis dominated the headlines. Forget that. Flacco has a howitzer for an arm and has already found the end zone six times this year with just two interceptions and three sacks. His QB rating of 101.4 is fifth in the NFL, just ahead of Ryan at 100.4. Brady is ranked No. 22 with a 79.9 rating.
Let’s not get caught up too much in those gaudy numbers, though. It’s early, and two of Baltimore’s games were at home against the Chiefs and Browns – two rebuilding teams with a whole lot of work left in front of them. But this New England team is also rebuilding on defense. That project took a hit when LB Jerod Mayo (sprained knee) was lost in the season opener, and it took a second hit when NT Vince Wilfork sprained his left ankle in the first half versus the Falcons. Word is he’ll be fine for Week 4, but Mayo is still a way’s away.
Wilfork had better be okay, because he’s about to encounter arguably the best offensive line in the NFL. The strength of the Baltimore running attack is twofold. First, it’s a group of talented linemen that now features Harvard alum Matt Birk at center, plus the one and only Michael Oher already steamrolling opponents at right tackle. Second, it’s the versatility of handing the ball to any of Willis McGahee, Ray Rice or 260-pound fullback Le’Ron McClain, who is being used as more of a blocker this year while McGahee (hardly a small man at 6-foot and 235 pounds) enjoys a revival of sorts. Ball possession should be in Baltimore’s favor this time. And that should be the difference in Week 4.
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
12:52 pm
Census Taker
Does Mark Sanchez run a 4.3? We are talking about in the 40 not the 100.
Benjamin
September 29th, 2009
12:52 pm
This team is going to be a 9-7, 10-6 kind of team, and as said above, Steve hit the nail on the head. There’s life in Falcon football again. Don’t squash it with unrealistic expectations.
In Dmitroff and co. I trust.
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
12:53 pm
“SUPER BOWL FAVORITES”:
Brady and Patriots brace for Baltimore Ravens
Tuesday, September 29, 2009 08:05 AM ET
By: Chance Harper | http://www.sbrforum.com
In what could be an AFC Championship preview, Tom Brady and New England will host Ray Lewis and Balitmore this Sunday at Gillette Stadium in Foxboro. Brady and the Patriots eased past Atlanta last Sunday for a 26-10 win and have seen their original 3-point chalk in this one bet down to just one. Meanwhile the Ravens come in off a 34-3 thrashing of the Browns, holding Cleveland to under 200 yards of offense.
Let’s see if you can survive this one, Mr. Brady.
Those pesky New England Patriots just don’t seem to know when their so-called dynasty is over. Just when all seemed dark – a defense with more questions than answers, a shaky offensive line – New England’s old guard came up vintage against the young Atlanta Falcons. Brady hooked up with Randy Moss for 10 of his 25 completions that covered 277 yards in total, Fred Taylor rushed 21 times for 105 yards, and the Patriots (-4.5 at home) pulled away in the second half en route to a 26-10 victory.
So the City of Boston should get back to preparing for the Super Bowl parade, yes? They’ll just have to ignore the fact that the Pats aren’t the SBXLIV favorites anymore. That honor goes to the Baltimore Ravens, whose betting odds have shortened from 11-1 at the open to 6-1. New England is now second best on the futures market at 13-2, down a tick from 6-1 at the open and as low as 4-1 before the start of the regular season. The Ravens were available at 18-1 just a few short weeks ago.
Baltimore continues to have the benefit of the doubt, judging by the fact that the Patriots are as low as 1-point home faves this Sunday afternoon (1:00 p.m. Eastern, CBS) on their own turf in Foxborough, down from three points at the open. The very early consensus reports show 60 percent support for the visiting Ravens; they’re one of four teams to start the 2009 campaign at 3-0 SU and ATS – the Jets, Broncos and Saints are the others. New England is now 2-1 SU and 1-2 ATS as we head into October.
This will be the second week in a row that the Patriots have to contend with one of the rarest of success stories: a quarterback who flourished in his rookie season. Atlanta’s Matt Ryan actually played well in Week 3: 17-for-28 and pick-free, but only 199 yards passing and zero touchdowns. Michael Jenkins had a catch in the end zone overturned for offensive pass interference. The Falcons had their problems on the run, where Michael Turner carried 15 times for just 56 yards and coughed up a fumble for the second week in a row. But mostly it was Brady and Friends holding possession for nearly 40 minutes that kept Ryan from working his magic.
This week, it’ll be Joe Flacco taking his shots against what still is a suspect New England defense. Flacco “earned” the reputation of being a management-style QB last year, throwing 14 TD passes (with 12 picks) while the running game and Ray Lewis dominated the headlines. Forget that. Flacco has a howitzer for an arm and has already found the end zone six times this year with just two interceptions and three sacks. His QB rating of 101.4 is fifth in the NFL, just ahead of Ryan at 100.4. Brady is ranked No. 22 with a 79.9 rating.
Let’s not get caught up too much in those gaudy numbers, though. It’s early, and two of Baltimore’s games were at home against the Chiefs and Browns – two rebuilding teams with a whole lot of work left in front of them. But this New England team is also rebuilding on defense. That project took a hit when LB Jerod Mayo (sprained knee) was lost in the season opener, and it took a second hit when NT Vince Wilfork sprained his left ankle in the first half versus the Falcons. Word is he’ll be fine for Week 4, but Mayo is still a way’s away.
Wilfork had better be okay, because he’s about to encounter arguably the best offensive line in the NFL. The strength of the Baltimore running attack is twofold. First, it’s a group of talented linemen that now features Harvard alum Matt Birk at center, plus the one and only Michael Oher already steamrolling opponents at right tackle. Second, it’s the versatility of handing the ball to any of Willis McGahee, Ray Rice or 260-pound fullback Le’Ron McClain, who is being used as more of a blocker this year while McGahee (hardly a small man at 6-foot and 235 pounds) enjoys a revival of sorts. Ball possession should be in Baltimore’s favor this time. And that should be the difference in Week 4.
Vick Supporter
September 29th, 2009
12:54 pm
Hmm…thats’s funny…the other QB i admire is Peyton Manning….well what do you know…he’s white. Makes no sense to mention him on a Falcon blog. Vick gets mentioned on here because he IS the Falcons…STILL. He STILL dominates the conversations on here…whether Vick supporters mention his name or not
Mike Vick Curse
September 29th, 2009
12:56 pm
2004 & Counting!!!!!!!!!!!!!
LRD
September 29th, 2009
12:58 pm
Since the Browns need a QB, and we need defensive players, is there any trade potential for Shockley? But then again, is there anyone we want from the Browns?
SHOULD HAVE DRAFTED FLACCO
September 29th, 2009
12:59 pm
“SUPER BOWL FAVORITES”
So the City of Boston should get back to preparing for the Super Bowl parade, yes? They’ll just have to ignore the fact that the Pats aren’t the SBXLIV favorites anymore. That honor goes to the Baltimore Ravens, whose betting odds have shortened from 11-1 at the open to 6-1. New England is now second best on the futures market at 13-2, down a tick from 6-1 at the open and as low as 4-1 before the start of the regular season. The Ravens were available at 18-1 just a few short weeks ago.
Baltimore continues to have the benefit of the doubt, judging by the fact that the Patriots are as low as 1-point home faves this Sunday afternoon (1:00 p.m. Eastern, CBS) on their own turf in Foxborough, down from three points at the open. The very early consensus reports show 60 percent support for the visiting Ravens; they’re one of four teams to start the 2009 campaign at 3-0 SU and ATS – the Jets, Broncos and Saints are the others. New England is now 2-1 SU and 1-2 ATS as we head into October.
Barry
September 29th, 2009
1:19 pm
Hey Y’all:
I have to admit, we played soft against the Patriots. We did not attack on offense nor on defense. The Patriots was sorry and we should have destroyed them with our weapons.
On offence, the running back,Turner, was tipping through the holes. He has been doing that since the season started. He is not blasting through holes like he did last year. We had a passive running game. On passing, we also was passive. We did not go deep but a few times. When we did we were pretty successful. Then we just stopped throwing down field. the Patriots secondary was horrible. We could have attacked them all day. Moreover, we caould have gotten a lot of interfwerence calls of this bunch, but we played soft. TOO SOFT!! We need to be a lot more nasty and aggressive on offensive. We need not fear anybody with the talent we have on offense. ATTACK THE DEFENSE!!
Even if they are trying to play what you want to do. ATTACK THEM!! Make them earn their keep by stopping us. Hey, they do it to us, don’t they??
On the defensive side of the ball our defensive linemen were involved in too many “individual battles” with the opposition linemen wherein they were not looking into the backfield to make plays. They have been doing this since the season started. The defensive line coaches must start teaching these guys to fight their man off while looking into the backfield to make plays on the quarterback and the running backs. They have to be alert to running backs running by them while they are “pussy footing” in fighting the blockers for too long. THEY HAVE TO FIGHT, LOOK, AND TACKLE!!! ALL DAY!!!!! The defensive line played soft on Sunday. More agressive coaching in this area would help.
Well, I guess we got the “BYE WEEK” to upgrade. And I guess the coaches need to upgrade also and stay in their agrresive coaching style as they did last year. There is never a time in football were you should start coaching non-agressively. YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME! YOU PLAY TO WIN THE GAME. I do not care who we play. We should never be intimdated by any team when we hit the field. I hope we learned from this game. We let a sorry Patriot team beat us because the coaches believed the “HYPE”. I love you guys but you can’t play in the NFL like that or you will not be here( NFL=NOT FOR LONG). You are professional football players and coaches and you should play to win the game “BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY”, no matter who you play. By all means you should play agressive on both sides of the ball. Even in “play calling”. Our secondary, on the other hand, played “GREAT!”. They had a number of great stops and are getting better every game. They wiil be our strength by game 5.
Nevertheless, the “PROCESS” continues, all all ends, coaching, included. NEVER AGAIN DO I WANT TO SEE THE FALCONS PLAY PASSIVE FOOTBALL!! That’s not our style. We have a hard nose, nasty bunch, of aggressive playing football players on both sides of the ball. Therefore, our coaches need to be NASTY, HARD NOSED, AGGRESSIVE COACHES in theie coaching and play calling.
WE ARE WITH YOU COACHES!! WE ARE WITH YOU, PLAYERS. WE ARE THE NASTY, HARD NOSED, AGGRESSIVE FANS. AND WE ARE DOWN WITH YOU IN
“ONE HEARTBEAT!!!!
GO FALCONS!!!!!!!!!!!
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is a SECRET from a FALCON FAN. TELL EVERYBODY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
……………………….”ONE HEARTBEAT, BABY!!!!”…………….
cdog
September 29th, 2009
1:40 pm
GOOD POINT MARK, I THINK EVERYONE SAW THAT. THE DEFENSIVE LINE TOOK SUNDAY OFF BUT IT WAS NOT THEIR TOTAL FAULT. ALONG WITH THE BIAS TERRIBLE OFFICIATING AND THE LACK OF AGGRESSIVE PREPARATION DEFENSIVELY BY THE COACHING STAFF,CAUSED THE LOST.YOU HAVE TO PUT PRESSURE ON AN IMMOBILE QB LIKE BRADY. COACH SMITH GAVE THE PATROITS TOO MUCH RESPECT. HOPEFULLY HE WILL LEARN FROM IT. THE DEFENSE MUST BLITZ TO WIN AND BE SUCCESSFUL. THAT DID NOT HAPPEN SUNDAY. SMITH SHOULD GO WITH WHAT HE DOES BEST ON DEFENSE AND THAT IS BLITZ. ABRAHAM CAN DOMINATE A GAME BUT WHEN A TEAM DOES NOT SEND THE OTHER PLAYERS HE CAN’T DO ANYTHING
Chris
September 29th, 2009
1:46 pm
The Falcons couldn’t blitz the Pats like the Jets did. The Pats spent the entire Jets game in shotgun, clearly showing pass so the Jets knew what was coming. The Pats wisely had Brady under center vs. Atlanta with lots of successful runs which opened up play-action. Abraham himself mentioned the D was caught off-guard.
Interestingly, the Pats looked their worst when they went shotgun in the redzone…something Atlanta clearly was prepared for.
Pete
September 29th, 2009
1:48 pm
Enter your comments here
The Falcons have this kind of “Curse” which enables them NEVER to see what 97.6% of their fan base sees…………especially in big games. Nothing EVER changes. It doesn’t matter who the coaches or players are. They play as if the game plan was drawn up by an 8th grade PE class. And then they wonder why home games have as many visitor jerseys on fans as Falcons.
Beyond pathetic.
Pete
September 29th, 2009
1:52 pm
Enter your comments here
This Falcon team plays about as SOFT as a girls Catholic Convent bowling team.
Pretty embarrassing to watch.
Fysh
September 29th, 2009
2:01 pm
Chill out Peeps. The Birds will be fine. So we got beat by New England, whoppity-whoop. Atlanta didnt play its best and New England played just good enough to win. We are 2-1 and 1-0 in the division. It could be worse, we could have Carolinas record.
Dave
September 29th, 2009
2:02 pm
Vick Supporter,
Thanks for your undying fascination with us. Doesn’t matter what you say, you still waste your days blogging here and it feels pretty good knowing that you can’t eyes off the ajc website and the mighty Atlanta Falcons. We’ll see you in a few minutes…and tommorrow….
cdog
September 29th, 2009
2:11 pm
MICHAEL VICK HAS NOTHING TO WITH WHAT’S GOING WITH THE FALCONS NOW. HE’S A PHILLY EAGLE. LET’S WAIT UNTIL DEC. 6 TO DISCUSS HIM.MATT RYAN IS NOT VICK AND VICE VERSA.RYAN IS A TOP NOTCH QB FIND FOR THE FALCONS. HE WILL LEAD THE FALCONS BACK TO THE PLAYOFFS BUT NOW THE COACHING STAFF NEEDS TO STOP SHOWING RESPECT FOR OTHER TEAMS AND BECOME AGGRESSIVE ON DEFENSE. ONCE THIS CORRECTED THE FALCONS WILL GO FAR INTO THE PLAYOFFS AND POSSIBLY THE SUPERBOWL.
Hollywould
September 29th, 2009
2:12 pm
Dave, His time on the library computer has run out.
FalcFan09
September 29th, 2009
2:21 pm
Hey Mark, Turner has fumbled 3 of the last 4 games. And all have been very crucial. Do you think this will be addressed? Every time he touches the ball, I hold my breath like I used to when Adam Jennings would field punts.
BIZZLE 5178
September 29th, 2009
2:23 pm
SOME OF YOU GUYS ARE SO COMEDY!!! FIRST OF ALL NO NEED TO PANIC ITS JUST ONE GAME. SECONDLY I THINK THE FALCONS DEFENSE DID ENOUGH TO WIN THE GAME. DID WE PLAY FLAWLESS FOOTBALL NO, BUT WE HELD NE TO I TOUCHDOWN OUT OF 5 CHANCES IN THE REDZONE. WHAT MORE CAN YOU ASK FROM A YOUNG AND COMING DEFENSE. THIRDLY WE DID NOT BLITZ BRADY A LOT, I WISH WE HAD BETTER BLITZ PACKAGES IF YOU ASK ME BECAUSE IF YOU WATCHED THE GAME MOST OF THE FEW TIMES WE DID BLITZ WE WERE STILL NOT ABLE TO GET ANY PRESSURE ON BRADY. IT WORKED FOR THE JETS BECAUSE THEY HAVE A COACH THAT HAS THE TYPE OF PLAYERS AND SCHEME THAT BLITZ THE QB EFFECTIVELY AND THEY HAVE THE CORNERS WITH THE SPEED AND COVER ABLITY TO BE ONE ON ONE IN THE SECONDAY. BRIAN WILLIAMS IS THE BEST CORNER WE HAVE AND HES ONLY BEEN ON THE TEAM A MONTH. GRIMES IS TO SMALL, JACKSON IS TO SLOW, HOUSTON JUST FINDS A WAY TO GET BURNED. IF YOU LOOK AT THE GAME, THE REAL PROBLEM WAS THE OFFENSE NOT THE DEFENSE. THE D HELD THEM TO 19 POINTS THROUGH 3 AND 1/2 QUARTERS. THE OFFENSE ONLY PUT UP 10 POINTS. WITH THE PLAYMAKERS WE HAVE ON OFFENSE THERE IS NOT REASON WE SHOULD EVER SCORE UNDER 21 POINTS A GAME. PERIOD!!!! I ACTUALLY THOUGHT THAT THE OFFENSIVE PLAY CALLING WAS HORRIBLE. EXAMPLE WHEN THE SCORE WAS 19-10 AND WE HAVE THE BALL AND IT 3RD AND 3 WE CALL A SHOTGUN PLAY THATS A SPRINT OUT TO THE RIGHT FOR MATT RYAN TO TRY TO THROW THE BALL TO RODDY WHITE! WHICH IF MY MEMORY IS CORRECT WE HAD ALREADY RUN THAT PLAY EARLIER IN THE GAME FOR A FIRST DOWN. IF YOU DO A SPRINT OUT AND THE ROUTE IS NOT THERE YOU SET YOU QB FOR FAILUER CAUSE YOU ONLY HAVE TWO ROUTES AVAILABLE AND THE SIDELINE BECOMES A DEFENDER. LET YOUR QB STAY IN THE POCKET READ THE DEFENSE AND MAKE A THROWN DOWN FIELD AND STOP TRYING TO GO FOR THE SAFE PLAY. CALL A BETTER GAME MIKE MULARKEY!!! AND FOR YOU JOE FLACCO FANS, NO DISRESPECT TO JOE, BUT IF MATT RYAN HAD THAT DEFENSE TO PLAY BEHIND HE MIGHT HAVE WON A SUPERBOWL LAST YEAR. JOE IS NICE BUT ALSO HELPS WHEN YOU DEFENSE IS ALWAYS PUTTING YOU IN GREAT POSITIONS.
DrJ
September 29th, 2009
3:08 pm
Mon Nite Football replayed the call on Jenkins’ pass, and those guys didn’t think the penalty should have been called. But it sure looked like the Pats were all good friends of the refs.